As I think more, RanVijay saying I will never betray you is a seed for creating the drama in the second half. This inconsistency is intended by Sandeep and to keep the audience questioning and make them engaged.
Nice to see that you people do these livestreams. Even though there are very less views and likes. I am sure you will eventually make this 500k subscribers. Keep doing what you are doing.
49:38 Sandy is saying that what is the use of that 10 minutes confession Scene. That is there because he is going for the war he may come or may not and ( In first half ask me anything i will tell you truth ) That's reason too. For telling her. We know he came back because revealing that 60 Years look in opening scene.
Why jalsa movie's title is jalsa? Explained by sandy in one of the episodes and this 1:04:30 are the one's which make sandy a great sensible and intelligent Podcaster.
after watching for 5-6 times, after losing the magic of highs, turned from Animal movie fan to a neutral. I agree with Missamma's opinions on Arjun Reddy's first kiss, Animal few parts.
Njoyed full video, Missamma garu meeru film maker aa? RGV ki kshanakshanam Laga Vanga god ki Animal. First half aithey fuselu out ainai. Editing back and forth was 🔥. Missamma garu cheppinattu, second half lo konni scenes lo too much of exposition anipinchindi.
When discussing about female I don't know much about the background of 2 ladies here. But there is lot of things missed you. I personally felt the film is forcefully filled insta reels kinda moments for audience to cheer. Also I felt dir has wantedly trying to trigger people. There is no need for Ranbir to be depicted as alpha male as core is father-son bond instead we of the relation with father or enmity with Bobby we get more on how this toxic alpha lead deals with things.there is no point in showing villain wives or his interaction then instead if they show how is affected by his brother's more. Major problem is majority think toxic or abusive relationship which involves domestic violence but the truth is over possessive nature and domination is the thing. Vanga literally normalizes this as in 2nd half we witness physical abuse that lowers the impact of rest of the toxic nature. Ranbir never feels geetha as equal in the relationship which is shown across 1st half.
Broader ga chudandi bro...on screenplay level lo..okko scene eppudo okasari vachindi bagundi ani intha discussion aa..second half lo emundi asalu...ranbir-rashmika-zoya episodes thappa..bra strips laagi kottadam,nude ga thiragatam asalem jaruguthundi ra ayya anukunna... ofcourse he is animal I get it..but where is the plot?..Where is Bobby Deol?..where is father-son drama??..nothing cut to climax fight and conclusion...shit scenes ni edo kalakandam laga discuss chestgunnaru...sodhi self obsessed movie with sandeep personal gula whixh has no proper script related to story line.especially second half is the worst..just because its Sandeep u dont need to discuss it like edo unnattu..em points teeddam ante em leva...dandam ra dootha... second half motham unneseccasy scenes e
Art ki ethics n morals n censor undakudada..movie is an art form which effects n influences majority of the mankind n needs all these aspects. Otherwise it is going to make ppl animals as shown in the movie and crime very casual. Pls stop supporting deliberately made n directed, disturbing ideology,unreasonable violence thinking n misogyny. I completely disagree with your views n opinions in this review. Movie was very badly written executed edited and made just to trigger the movie critics n feminists as a click bait. You lost a loyal subscriber
My only question is : Art ki morals and ethics undali, evari morals, evari ethics? Evaru decide chestaru ee parameters? I understand that you are very disturbed by the movie and that is fair. Sad to see you go but I hope you understand the larger point on art that I was trying to go.
@@ChitraAlochana Both Art form creator ki as well as the audience ki. Ethics morals are required for life in every aspect of it not confined to any individual or a form, nobody and nothing is an exception. I'm a movie maker, this is my art, Nak ethics morality tho pani ledu Nak imagination ki vachinadi pratidi chestanante that is criminal. Even murderers feel that they are right in their own pov n do things, that does not make them right. Society gurnchi, mana thought process tho create chesina movie valla chusina minds lo vache impact gurnchi think chesi moral responsibility tho teeyali cinemalu. ANIMALS are meant to be in the forest, not the society. You make the Hero of the film an Animal, glorify his animalistic behavior as heroism, glamourise his brutal n misogynistic thinking against women, enjoy the stomach churning violence and call it the BEST movie of the year. Sorry very hard to digest the fact that these kind of movies are also considered entertaining by educated n opinionated sector of the society like us
Sad to see that you are equating an actual criminal (who commits crime by ACTUALLY physically effecting people/living beings around) to a filmmaker who is creating art in a FICTIONAL world. The implications of any form of art should not be the artists headache before even making what they want to make/create. If that starts to creep in, no artist will ever be able to satisfy every person that watches their art because they will be stuck at the point where whether an action (from a character) is "satisfactory" enough to these so called audience who are going to "moral check" them and not about creating the artist's or the character's true expression. As a lot of people said, "do not burden a film/filmmaker with YOUR moral compass".
@@Abhi-vl9qn yes he succeeded in what he wanted to show n now it's us who need to take a call, praise it as a BEST FILM or address the movie for all its pros n cons. There is no two opinions here. Violence, misogyny, unacceptable, unethical, immoral, lawless acts are clearly visible. If you want to give him the credit for showing them as an art form n creativity , I'm sad why one has only this to create, dream n imagine of. Why not something pleasant and worth watching. I don't see anything which anybody can takeaway from the narrative.Moral compass is far away, this is a disturbing film for any other common viewer, there is nothing entertaining or educating.
Unfortunately this movie is being praised more than it deserves.The movie does not deliver what it promises. This did not feel like a character study of an alpha man lost on dad’s love. This seems like director just wanted to trigger and get back to the critics like a kid. And one person in the panel justified knowing about zoya’s intentions as his “animal instincts”. In that case the writing cannot be criticized at all because anything the director writes can be justified as “he is an animal, that’s how animals behave”. Sorry but that justification doesn’t seem right. The director loses track multiple times and that pulls one out of the movie. And towards the end I felt betrayed as an audience with Ranbir doing the gesture. Is it for the audience who pay for the ticket or the critics with whom he has a beef with? If so, are we fools. He could have done a private screening for the critics. Coming to morals of the movie. Director should have basic moral ground and cannot be said director can make a movie however he wants because we are not living in an ideal society. Here unfortunately heroes are worshipped. If we want to start watching movie as a movie and not think audience can get influenced by it, then they should start treating their job as a job. But the people involved want the fame and want fan clubs, want audience going crazy for them, want huge collections, propagate pap culture, have PR. Anything and everything to maintain certain aura but don’t want to be responsible for their work. Sorry, it’s a 2 way street. Cannot have one without the other. Fin.
Appreciate the detailed comment. Will agree on the point about the instincts and how it can be used to justify everything. Fair criticism. The later part where you say that we do not live in an ideal society and therefore the filmmaker has to be responsible, allow me to repeat something I said in a different comment. The filmmaker is creating art in a fictional world. The implications of any form of art should not be the artists headache before even making what they want to make/create. If that starts to creep in, the artist will be stuck at the point where whether an action/dialogue (from a character) is "politically/morally correct" enough to these so called audience who are going to "moral check" the artist's work and not about creating what the artist truly wants to say/express. As a lot of people said, "do not burden a film/filmmaker with your moral compass". Any filmmaker will be responsible for what the characters/story in the film says because they made it. Not for anything that happens outside in the real world. If you are interested, you can watch Vanga's breakdown with Baddy on Gallata.
@@ChitraAlochanaFirst meeru Vanga shit teesina analyse chesi break down cheyyatam apeyyandi..enni cinemalu anna inka ade animalistic protagonist character tho?..Arjun Reddy ade kada..idi kuda ade malli..Edo kotha ga unnattu em discussion meedi asalu...second half lo plot emundi?..asal Dad-Son Bonding emundi 3 hr 21 mins lo..paina cheppina aayana correct e..knchm responsible ga kuda undali filmmakers...teenagers,kids Mee antha mature undaru..poneey emina unique story daniki avasram aa scenes ante ala kuda kadu...leki character,leki scenes..Enduku bra strip lagi kottadam,deeniki BR tho chesina video chudala..ide qn BR adigithe thippi thippi Edo edo cheppadu some random shit...
@@ChitraAlochana I know brother.. opinions..but nak anpinchindi cheppa..just because Vanga kabatti em teesina super undi/undochu ani dissect chestharu ani na opinion.. second half lo em plot undi okkati cheppandi..character study anakandi malli...he is a good technician,good music taste undi but the content as script is bad and u don't even go there.....Animal handle pettina reply chudandi for Javed akter critical statement about hero asking the woman to lick his boot...inka daniki BR interview lo manodu ichina reasoning aythe ultra Max pro...idantha kadu bro Father-son emotion nuv feel ayyava movie lo at the end of 3 hr 21 mins...tell me honestly..just want to know
@@saikumark6504 Aa twitter handle run chesthunna vallani adagandi. That beef is irrelevant to what's in the film. Aa run chesthunna athanu emante maakenti? Cinema paina maa opinion rendu lives chesi, anipinchindi cheppamu. Father-Son sangathiki vasthe, naaku inka gut punch undalsindhi chivarlo anipinchindi. Idi rendu sarlu chusina tharavatha anipinchina vishayam. Inka 2nd half lo em undo ledo meere cheppesthunnaru, maa opinion enduku le.
Mythili akka and Missamma >>>>
hope to see them in more lives!
As I think more, RanVijay saying I will never betray you is a seed for creating the drama in the second half. This inconsistency is intended by Sandeep and to keep the audience questioning and make them engaged.
Much needed pod guys❤ Thank you for logical discussion about the film
Nice to see that you people do these livestreams. Even though there are very less views and likes. I am sure you will eventually make this 500k subscribers. Keep doing what you are doing.
Thank you so much for the kind words! :D
49:38 Sandy is saying that what is the use of that 10 minutes confession Scene.
That is there because he is going for the war he may come or may not and ( In first half ask me anything i will tell you truth ) That's reason too. For telling her.
We know he came back because revealing that 60 Years look in opening scene.
1:04:30. Wow! Wow! Wow! Chitralochana ni yeppati nundo follow aitunna.
The given time stamp is one more reason to follow this yt channel. ❤
Super stream & super panel Keep up the good work
Beautiful discussion, loved it!
Thank you Eshanth! :)
Why jalsa movie's title is jalsa? Explained by sandy in one of the episodes and this 1:04:30 are the one's which make sandy a great sensible and intelligent Podcaster.
Pls do another review with barbell and discuss in depth.
after watching for 5-6 times, after losing the magic of highs, turned from Animal movie fan to a neutral. I agree with Missamma's opinions on Arjun Reddy's first kiss, Animal few parts.
Njoyed full video, Missamma garu meeru film maker aa? RGV ki kshanakshanam Laga Vanga god ki Animal. First half aithey fuselu out ainai. Editing back and forth was 🔥. Missamma garu cheppinattu, second half lo konni scenes lo too much of exposition anipinchindi.
Ranbir has some feeling for zoya , sandeep told in an interview
Paramathmudu explain chesthara?
Alane flight movie Arjun Reddy movie direct copy scenes dialogues unnai veeti paina emantaru?
Missamma doesn't make lot of sense..rest all good
When discussing about female I don't know much about the background of 2 ladies here. But there is lot of things missed you. I personally felt the film is forcefully filled insta reels kinda moments for audience to cheer. Also I felt dir has wantedly trying to trigger people. There is no need for Ranbir to be depicted as alpha male as core is father-son bond instead we of the relation with father or enmity with Bobby we get more on how this toxic alpha lead deals with things.there is no point in showing villain wives or his interaction then instead if they show how is affected by his brother's more. Major problem is majority think toxic or abusive relationship which involves domestic violence but the truth is over possessive nature and domination is the thing. Vanga literally normalizes this as in 2nd half we witness physical abuse that lowers the impact of rest of the toxic nature. Ranbir never feels geetha as equal in the relationship which is shown across 1st half.
Showing how women will come back to the alpha man even after any abuse is barely recognized by audience. As its highly normailzed
Life lo mundhu choopu vundaali raa ani keeda cola lo chepthe ento anukunna, intha meaning vundha dheentlo
@@shivagurrala Em meaning bro?
@@ChitraAlochana 01:13:50
😂😂😂😂😂
"chaala mundu chupu undi ra"
blue shirt guy is protoytpe of bigg bosss sudheer
Big Boss evaru? Sudheer evaru? Nenem chesanandi? 😂
Broader ga chudandi bro...on screenplay level lo..okko scene eppudo okasari vachindi bagundi ani intha discussion aa..second half lo emundi asalu...ranbir-rashmika-zoya episodes thappa..bra strips laagi kottadam,nude ga thiragatam asalem jaruguthundi ra ayya anukunna... ofcourse he is animal I get it..but where is the plot?..Where is Bobby Deol?..where is father-son drama??..nothing cut to climax fight and conclusion...shit scenes ni edo kalakandam laga discuss chestgunnaru...sodhi self obsessed movie with sandeep personal gula whixh has no proper script related to story line.especially second half is the worst..just because its Sandeep u dont need to discuss it like edo unnattu..em points teeddam ante em leva...dandam ra dootha... second half motham unneseccasy scenes e
Agree with you totally
Art ki ethics n morals n censor undakudada..movie is an art form which effects n influences majority of the mankind n needs all these aspects. Otherwise it is going to make ppl animals as shown in the movie and crime very casual. Pls stop supporting deliberately made n directed, disturbing ideology,unreasonable violence thinking n misogyny. I completely disagree with your views n opinions in this review. Movie was very badly written executed edited and made just to trigger the movie critics n feminists as a click bait. You lost a loyal subscriber
My only question is :
Art ki morals and ethics undali, evari morals, evari ethics?
Evaru decide chestaru ee parameters?
I understand that you are very disturbed by the movie and that is fair. Sad to see you go but I hope you understand the larger point on art that I was trying to go.
@@ChitraAlochana Both Art form creator ki as well as the audience ki. Ethics morals are required for life in every aspect of it not confined to any individual or a form, nobody and nothing is an exception. I'm a movie maker, this is my art, Nak ethics morality tho pani ledu Nak imagination ki vachinadi pratidi chestanante that is criminal. Even murderers feel that they are right in their own pov n do things, that does not make them right. Society gurnchi, mana thought process tho create chesina movie valla chusina minds lo vache impact gurnchi think chesi moral responsibility tho teeyali cinemalu. ANIMALS are meant to be in the forest, not the society. You make the Hero of the film an Animal, glorify his animalistic behavior as heroism, glamourise his brutal n misogynistic thinking against women, enjoy the stomach churning violence and call it the BEST movie of the year. Sorry very hard to digest the fact that these kind of movies are also considered entertaining by educated n opinionated sector of the society like us
Sad to see that you are equating an actual criminal (who commits crime by ACTUALLY physically effecting people/living beings around) to a filmmaker who is creating art in a FICTIONAL world. The implications of any form of art should not be the artists headache before even making what they want to make/create. If that starts to creep in, no artist will ever be able to satisfy every person that watches their art because they will be stuck at the point where whether an action (from a character) is "satisfactory" enough to these so called audience who are going to "moral check" them and not about creating the artist's or the character's true expression.
As a lot of people said, "do not burden a film/filmmaker with YOUR moral compass".
These polarizing views is exactly what Vanga envisioned 😂
@@Abhi-vl9qn yes he succeeded in what he wanted to show n now it's us who need to take a call, praise it as a BEST FILM or address the movie for all its pros n cons. There is no two opinions here. Violence, misogyny, unacceptable, unethical, immoral, lawless acts are clearly visible. If you want to give him the credit for showing them as an art form n creativity , I'm sad why one has only this to create, dream n imagine of. Why not something pleasant and worth watching. I don't see anything which anybody can takeaway from the narrative.Moral compass is far away, this is a disturbing film for any other common viewer, there is nothing entertaining or educating.
Unfortunately this movie is being praised more than it deserves.The movie does not deliver what it promises. This did not feel like a character study of an alpha man lost on dad’s love. This seems like director just wanted to trigger and get back to the critics like a kid.
And one person in the panel justified knowing about zoya’s intentions as his “animal instincts”. In that case the writing cannot be criticized at all because anything the director writes can be justified as “he is an animal, that’s how animals behave”. Sorry but that justification doesn’t seem right. The director loses track multiple times and that pulls one out of the movie.
And towards the end I felt betrayed as an audience with Ranbir doing the gesture. Is it for the audience who pay for the ticket or the critics with whom he has a beef with? If so, are we fools. He could have done a private screening for the critics.
Coming to morals of the movie. Director should have basic moral ground and cannot be said director can make a movie however he wants because we are not living in an ideal society. Here unfortunately heroes are worshipped. If we want to start watching movie as a movie and not think audience can get influenced by it, then they should start treating their job as a job. But the people involved want the fame and want fan clubs, want audience going crazy for them, want huge collections, propagate pap culture, have PR. Anything and everything to maintain certain aura but don’t want to be responsible for their work. Sorry, it’s a 2 way street. Cannot have one without the other. Fin.
Appreciate the detailed comment.
Will agree on the point about the instincts and how it can be used to justify everything. Fair criticism.
The later part where you say that we do not live in an ideal society and therefore the filmmaker has to be responsible, allow me to repeat something I said in a different comment.
The filmmaker is creating art in a fictional world. The implications of any form of art should not be the artists headache before even making what they want to make/create. If that starts to creep in, the artist will be stuck at the point where whether an action/dialogue (from a character) is "politically/morally correct" enough to these so called audience who are going to "moral check" the artist's work and not about creating what the artist truly wants to say/express.
As a lot of people said, "do not burden a film/filmmaker with your moral compass".
Any filmmaker will be responsible for what the characters/story in the film says because they made it. Not for anything that happens outside in the real world. If you are interested, you can watch Vanga's breakdown with Baddy on Gallata.
@@ChitraAlochanaFirst meeru Vanga shit teesina analyse chesi break down cheyyatam apeyyandi..enni cinemalu anna inka ade animalistic protagonist character tho?..Arjun Reddy ade kada..idi kuda ade malli..Edo kotha ga unnattu em discussion meedi asalu...second half lo plot emundi?..asal Dad-Son Bonding emundi 3 hr 21 mins lo..paina cheppina aayana correct e..knchm responsible ga kuda undali filmmakers...teenagers,kids Mee antha mature undaru..poneey emina unique story daniki avasram aa scenes ante ala kuda kadu...leki character,leki scenes..Enduku bra strip lagi kottadam,deeniki BR tho chesina video chudala..ide qn BR adigithe thippi thippi Edo edo cheppadu some random shit...
@@saikumark6504 Memu em cheyyalo cheyyakoodadho cheppe hakku meeku Ela aithe ledo, Vanga em cheyyali, Ela theeyali, enni sarlu theeyali ani cheppe hakku meeku maaku ledu. Meeku nachaledu, maaku nachindi. Anthe Theda.
@@ChitraAlochana I know brother.. opinions..but nak anpinchindi cheppa..just because Vanga kabatti em teesina super undi/undochu ani dissect chestharu ani na opinion.. second half lo em plot undi okkati cheppandi..character study anakandi malli...he is a good technician,good music taste undi but the content as script is bad and u don't even go there.....Animal handle pettina reply chudandi for Javed akter critical statement about hero asking the woman to lick his boot...inka daniki BR interview lo manodu ichina reasoning aythe ultra Max pro...idantha kadu bro Father-son emotion nuv feel ayyava movie lo at the end of 3 hr 21 mins...tell me honestly..just want to know
@@saikumark6504 Aa twitter handle run chesthunna vallani adagandi. That beef is irrelevant to what's in the film. Aa run chesthunna athanu emante maakenti? Cinema paina maa opinion rendu lives chesi, anipinchindi cheppamu. Father-Son sangathiki vasthe, naaku inka gut punch undalsindhi chivarlo anipinchindi. Idi rendu sarlu chusina tharavatha anipinchina vishayam. Inka 2nd half lo em undo ledo meere cheppesthunnaru, maa opinion enduku le.