Thank you for this, Christopher. I benefited a lot from Dermot Moran's work throughout the years. His writings on Husserl are rigorous and accessible. It was very nice to see you two in conversation.
I've this strange relationship to Husserl; My professor was Lothar Udert and his Professor was Eugen Fink, the last assistant of Edmund Husserl. What I like most about him, apart from his philosophy is that through the books you can watch him learning. And he is not afraid to share it with you, and be it a hundred years later
Wonderful talk, best intro I've ever heard to Husserl. He's a hugely important transitional figure in the history of philosophy/psychology, but one that is somewhat poorly understood I feel, probably because of the complex depth of his thinking, and also his scientific orientation. From Dr. Moran's talk, it's understood he's somewhere in the realm of a scientific/psych/philos thinker. He def posed a lot of inquiries that have yet to be fully realized, in a way very similar to the thinking on the unconscious proposed by Freud and Jung, etc. We opened a lot of doors in the 20th century, but the perplexing nature of the considerations involved for experiences, sense, memory, consciousness, life, etc. will have us puzzling for many centuries, and so it goes. Awesome talk! Thank you so much.
Great video and guest as always! For those interested in Husserl’s most mature phase I can wholly recommend Moran’s commentary on Husserl’s Crisis writings-it helped me a great deal in my undergraduate studies.
Unfortunately, Husserl's philosophy is like Hegel's in that you have to go through the myriad detailed arguments/ descriptions for which there is no substitute but to laboriously go through them in their original, even the 400 page shorter Logical Investigations is a pale impression of the massive 2000 odd page original. To read Husserl's " main" works one has to go through about 6000 pages of hard philosophy
Thank you for this, Christopher. I benefited a lot from Dermot Moran's work throughout the years. His writings on Husserl are rigorous and accessible. It was very nice to see you two in conversation.
Absolutely amazing to have Dermot on your show ... Thanks a lot!
I've this strange relationship to Husserl; My professor was Lothar Udert and his Professor was Eugen Fink, the last assistant of Edmund Husserl.
What I like most about him, apart from his philosophy is that through the books you can watch him learning. And he is not afraid to share it with you, and be it a hundred years later
Wonderful talk, best intro I've ever heard to Husserl. He's a hugely important transitional figure in the history of philosophy/psychology, but one that is somewhat poorly understood I feel, probably because of the complex depth of his thinking, and also his scientific orientation. From Dr. Moran's talk, it's understood he's somewhere in the realm of a scientific/psych/philos thinker. He def posed a lot of inquiries that have yet to be fully realized, in a way very similar to the thinking on the unconscious proposed by Freud and Jung, etc. We opened a lot of doors in the 20th century, but the perplexing nature of the considerations involved for experiences, sense, memory, consciousness, life, etc. will have us puzzling for many centuries, and so it goes. Awesome talk! Thank you so much.
Great video and guest as always!
For those interested in Husserl’s most mature phase I can wholly recommend Moran’s commentary on Husserl’s Crisis writings-it helped me a great deal in my undergraduate studies.
As knowlegeble as he is humble and kind.
I feel greatly honourd to recently have met with Dr Moran i Copenhagen.
this is great! please have him return to speak on Meinong! ❤
i never hear him even mentioned 😮
Brilliant!
Very concise and informative. Thanks for posting.
Gilles Grelet's Anti-phenomenology is also interesting as a late fruit of Husserl's thought
Unfortunately, Husserl's philosophy is like Hegel's in that you have to go through the myriad detailed arguments/ descriptions for which there is no substitute but to laboriously go through them in their original, even the 400 page shorter Logical Investigations is a pale impression of the massive 2000 odd page original. To read Husserl's " main" works one has to go through about 6000 pages of hard philosophy
Hmm nope it's clearly distinct in the middle of this page all these synonymous that reverse the ontological of the context, it's literal like 6 pages.