Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements (Part 1)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
- Discrete Mathematics: Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements
Topics discussed:
1) The Universal Instantiation rule.
2) A problem based on the rule of Universal Instantiation.
3) The Universal Generalization rule.
4) A problem based on the rule of Universal Generalization.
Follow Neso Academy on Instagram: @nesoacademy(bit.ly/2XP63OE)
Follow me on Instagram: @jaspreetedu(bit.ly/2YX26E5)
Contribute: www.nesoacademy...
Memberships: bit.ly/2U7YSPI
Books: www.nesoacademy...
Website ► www.nesoacademy...
Forum ► forum.nesoacade...
Facebook ► goo.gl/Nt0PmB
Twitter ► / nesoacademy
Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]
#DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths #RuleOfInference #QuantifiedStatements
You're a life saver!! My textbook did not explain this well
Yes iam in same your situation
been two years, did u graduate ?
@@ibrahimmkhawajaa 4 classes left!
Extraordinary explanation sir❤
thank you so much its one of the most useful channel for me. the beSt one ngl.
When will this playlist get completed ?Also when this logic chapter will be completed ?
Very great Explanation Sir🥰🥰
jazak Allah SIR
Arbitrary doesnt make sense to me. If arbitrary c can equal any random x value then isnt it the same as x? Arbitrary c = x
I wonder why there are mathematicians named complex names to propositional and predicate logics such as hypothetical syllogism, Modus tollens bla bla.... Instead of confusing students with Hypothetical Syllogism they could have named it as Transitive Property of Propositions which is simple to read and easy to understand.
Syllogism means a form of arguing in which two statements are used to prove that a third statement is true, for example, ‘All humans are mortal; I am a human, therefore I am mortal.’
I think if you know meaning of that English word it helps in understanding it better.
Good Teaching 🤩💯
thank you so much!
Amazing
Thanks sir
Useful tnx sir
What to do for 2 place predicate
So, anyone remember Mia from lecture 31 ? I tried that and found that argument is valid. Right ?
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
◉‿◉◉‿◉
Thank you so much.