Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements (Part 1)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • Discrete Mathematics: Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements
    Topics discussed:
    1) The Universal Instantiation rule.
    2) A problem based on the rule of Universal Instantiation.
    3) The Universal Generalization rule.
    4) A problem based on the rule of Universal Generalization.
    Follow Neso Academy on Instagram: @nesoacademy(bit.ly/2XP63OE)
    Follow me on Instagram: @jaspreetedu(bit.ly/2YX26E5)
    Contribute: www.nesoacademy...
    Memberships: bit.ly/2U7YSPI
    Books: www.nesoacademy...
    Website ► www.nesoacademy...
    Forum ► forum.nesoacade...
    Facebook ► goo.gl/Nt0PmB
    Twitter ► / nesoacademy
    Music:
    Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]
    #DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths #RuleOfInference #QuantifiedStatements

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @UnseenOct
    @UnseenOct 3 роки тому +31

    You're a life saver!! My textbook did not explain this well

    • @JD-eb5qu
      @JD-eb5qu 3 роки тому +2

      Yes iam in same your situation

    • @ibrahimmkhawajaa
      @ibrahimmkhawajaa Рік тому

      been two years, did u graduate ?

    • @UnseenOct
      @UnseenOct Рік тому

      @@ibrahimmkhawajaa 4 classes left!

  • @coding.tutorial3713
    @coding.tutorial3713 9 місяців тому +1

    Extraordinary explanation sir❤

  • @spaul484
    @spaul484 Рік тому +1

    thank you so much its one of the most useful channel for me. the beSt one ngl.

  • @silverstone9952
    @silverstone9952 3 роки тому +6

    When will this playlist get completed ?Also when this logic chapter will be completed ?

  • @laibasamreen
    @laibasamreen 5 місяців тому

    Very great Explanation Sir🥰🥰

  • @sajalqasim3540
    @sajalqasim3540 3 роки тому +3

    jazak Allah SIR

  • @saadidriss9402
    @saadidriss9402 2 роки тому +2

    Arbitrary doesnt make sense to me. If arbitrary c can equal any random x value then isnt it the same as x? Arbitrary c = x

  • @satishchandramedi9729
    @satishchandramedi9729 3 роки тому +4

    I wonder why there are mathematicians named complex names to propositional and predicate logics such as hypothetical syllogism, Modus tollens bla bla.... Instead of confusing students with Hypothetical Syllogism they could have named it as Transitive Property of Propositions which is simple to read and easy to understand.

    • @jpatel0924
      @jpatel0924 2 місяці тому

      Syllogism means a form of arguing in which two statements are used to prove that a third statement is true, for example, ‘All humans are mortal; I am a human, therefore I am mortal.’
      I think if you know meaning of that English word it helps in understanding it better.

  • @warrior-mg2kj
    @warrior-mg2kj 2 роки тому +1

    Good Teaching 🤩💯

  • @snehanangunoori7838
    @snehanangunoori7838 Рік тому

    thank you so much!

  • @reniersteytler1859
    @reniersteytler1859 Рік тому

    Amazing

  • @Prasoonvarshney16
    @Prasoonvarshney16 3 роки тому

    Thanks sir

  • @JD-eb5qu
    @JD-eb5qu 3 роки тому

    Useful tnx sir

  • @athiyanavneeth7152
    @athiyanavneeth7152 3 роки тому

    What to do for 2 place predicate

  • @rajeshprajapati1851
    @rajeshprajapati1851 Рік тому

    So, anyone remember Mia from lecture 31 ? I tried that and found that argument is valid. Right ?

  • @shashank_kishore_
    @shashank_kishore_ 28 днів тому

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @jyotithakur24
    @jyotithakur24 3 роки тому

    ◉‿◉◉‿◉

  • @v.ningthoujam7830
    @v.ningthoujam7830 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much.