'At What Point Will You Be Satisfied?': Ron Johnson Grills OMB Director On Biden's Projected Taxes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 бер 2023
  • At a Senate Budget Committee hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) questioned OMB Director Shalanda Young on President Biden's proposed budget.
    Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
    account.forbes.com/membership...
    Stay Connected
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @dwtdwtdwt
    @dwtdwtdwt Рік тому +81

    Diversity Hire.

    • @josemorrasge8100
      @josemorrasge8100 Рік тому +4

      She reminds me of the Governor of Georgia, Stacey Abrams.

    • @poolmonkey7479
      @poolmonkey7479 Рік тому

      @@josemorrasge8100 ..both remind me of hungry hungry hippos

    • @mjones4083
      @mjones4083 Рік тому +2

      & perversely by doing so , they end up massively negatively stereotyping the "diverse" demographic .

    • @UVBluesman
      @UVBluesman 3 місяці тому

      @@mjones4083 that is an excellent point, that you rarely hear. They most often hurt the very people they claim to be helping, and are most worried about. Because too much is never enough, as in this video. And, too outrageous is never outrageous enough. Keep in mind that the very nature of "progressivism" is to constantly change, mostly simply for the sake of change, otherwise you've become a conservative.

    • @mjones4083
      @mjones4083 3 місяці тому

      @@UVBluesman Thank you for your comment . I have never seen the point of changing anything that actually works well and as such do not do "change for changes sake" . & change seems to happen so quickly nowadays that there is no time for proper reflection /adjustment and as such can turn out to "progressive levelling down " - with disastrous consequences . Diversity hire is a (troubling ) example of this.

  • @TsavosAlliance
    @TsavosAlliance Рік тому +33

    She can't answer anything.

  • @Mymindsgoingblanknow
    @Mymindsgoingblanknow Рік тому +99

    I'm surprised she didn't find room in there to put the blame on Trump.

  • @michaelwheeling7422
    @michaelwheeling7422 Рік тому +68

    The lady isn't an economist. She just knows what she knows. She can't step out of that box and get into a discussion beyond that.

    • @samfrancisco8095
      @samfrancisco8095 Рік тому +4

      Or an actuarial or accountant by any stretch of the imagination.

    • @johnschuh8616
      @johnschuh8616 Рік тому +7

      She is just basically a face in a picture on the wall. Color her face white and with her credentials she would not be there ,

    • @ernestmoney7800
      @ernestmoney7800 Рік тому +2

      Prior to the video she said the top 1% should pay their fair share. It is reasonable to ask her what that share should be.

    • @Fvcky0uverymuch
      @Fvcky0uverymuch Рік тому

      @@johnschuh8616 I am white

    • @Fvcky0uverymuch
      @Fvcky0uverymuch Рік тому +1

      No I'm not.. And I do know what I know

  • @ricknblueridge
    @ricknblueridge Рік тому +729

    Every single time we see one of Biden's nominees being questioned, it's like watching "Dumb and Dumber"

  • @rkgaustin9043
    @rkgaustin9043 Рік тому +572

    The government doesn't have a revenue problem it has a spending problem.

    • @PaulStringini
      @PaulStringini Рік тому

      Right. What is all this bullshit about taxing the rich? I thought they had just settled on taxing us poor folks by printing more money.

    • @michaelhart8401
      @michaelhart8401 Рік тому +9

      Bingo

    • @chrisbraswell8864
      @chrisbraswell8864 Рік тому +8

      Just like gamblers. Only with someone else's money. Spending more than you take in is something most people will not do. But credit cards are much in demand.

    • @bonniehall578
      @bonniehall578 Рік тому

      Problem is GOP allowed Trump three debt ceiling increases in 4 years. This ran up our national debt in four years more than the previous 20 years. Now they want Dem leadership to make up for his spending. Same thing that has been going on for 40 years. Republicans run up our debt and then they want Democrat leadership to lower it, so next Republican President can run it up again. It is all in the books.

    • @baibangura9654
      @baibangura9654 Рік тому +6

      I agree 100. Doesn't matter if u are rich or poor. We are all overtaxed. Somebody needs to address the spending problem Washington dc has. We are over 30 trillion dollars in debt

  • @Hindia00
    @Hindia00 Рік тому +61

    The Senator had to educate this lady about the tax numbers. Unbelievable!

  • @WildElroy13
    @WildElroy13 Рік тому +18

    Imagine being an employer and you ask an employee about something that affects your company and they respond with "Well, that's your opinion.". I think that employee would be looking for a new job.

  • @TheMensLifeMastery
    @TheMensLifeMastery Рік тому +78

    How come Democrats in Congress can NEVER answer the question?
    Same in Canada with the Liberals in Parliament.

    • @georgehatzimanolakis1904
      @georgehatzimanolakis1904 Рік тому

      this is totally true but maybe the answer isn't that simple

    • @HondoTrailside
      @HondoTrailside Рік тому +2

      Nobody is going to post situations, or watch them, where lucid and informative answers were given. That doesn't sound like clickbait to me.
      It is odd that there aren't any legal sanctions or penalties for appearing like a crook, or a moron.

    • @boss42971
      @boss42971 Рік тому

      because the facts are not on their side.

  • @ragdollb9667
    @ragdollb9667 Рік тому +139

    She didn’t do her homework…She doesn’t understand… ☹️

    • @laureenaiello474
      @laureenaiello474 Рік тому +11

      She should not be in this position

    • @tomjohnson3610
      @tomjohnson3610 Рік тому +4

      Your racism is showing. This young lady is a victim.

    • @josemorrasge8100
      @josemorrasge8100 Рік тому

      Probably had a pass on doing homework because she was oppressed by those racist Whites.

    • @josemorrasge8100
      @josemorrasge8100 Рік тому +6

      ​@Tom how is she a victim? She went to one of the best universities and paid by taxpayers. I get it now, you're being sarcastic. Maga 2024

    • @salventi5665
      @salventi5665 Рік тому

      She's States facts. Facts bother maga. The top 1% controls over 60% of the wealth in America. Probably much more. They pay far less in taxes because of GOP loopholes created to help them. Anyone would be a complete moron to think the top 1% are being mistreated.

  • @86OEd
    @86OEd Рік тому +8

    She is in over her head; but checks all the boxes to qualify for the position!

  • @petermannix1772
    @petermannix1772 Рік тому +15

    One of the biggest problems was to elect people because of the color of their skin and not because they are the best qualified. It's sad but true. Not everyone is going to make it...this goes for everybody regardless of the color of the skin of backgrounds.

  • @fullnelson3028
    @fullnelson3028 Рік тому +25

    400 families? wtf? Who gets taxed per family? diveristy hires will kill America

  • @margaretchayka6878
    @margaretchayka6878 Рік тому +4

    There has to be some kind of punishment for not answering a question. They should have to sit in a room with a Yoko Ono album playing at full blast or something.

  • @dalesuhre6522
    @dalesuhre6522 Рік тому +9

    At school when you are taking a test for math, is now common to be asked to show your work on how you got your answer. It seems that every individual being question by any house or Senate panel thinks that they are in school and they have to explain their answer. When you are asked the question what percent do you want to be you should not have to explain anything else but just give the percent. But since these Witnesses know that the questionnaire has a time limit they will filibuster as much time as they can.

  • @laureenaiello474
    @laureenaiello474 Рік тому +125

    Of course she won’t answer
    Because she doesn’t know the answer
    What a genius
    Twisted as usual obviously she has no clue

    • @23Toyboy23
      @23Toyboy23 Рік тому

      She tried to answer twice but he stopped her each Time, so...

    • @josemorrasge8100
      @josemorrasge8100 Рік тому +7

      ​@@23Toyboy23 stop trolling. Lmao

    • @djstl
      @djstl Рік тому

      Democrats suck at math.

    • @dezznutz3743
      @dezznutz3743 Рік тому +1

      She knows the answer. Shes obfuscating.

    • @laureenaiello474
      @laureenaiello474 Рік тому +3

      @@23Toyboy23 because she was not answering!!

  • @bigron8346
    @bigron8346 Рік тому +348

    This is what happens when they hire for color of skin instead of qualifications.

    • @douglascamarillo660
      @douglascamarillo660 Рік тому

      Exactly. Left leaning people of color. Biden's people.

    • @beemanma675
      @beemanma675 Рік тому +5

      There is a lot of unqualified on each side,not only ones that you seem to imply that have melaninated skin

    • @bigron8346
      @bigron8346 Рік тому +6

      You mean f##king black!

    • @beemanma675
      @beemanma675 Рік тому +3

      @@bigron8346 you understood,so what's the problem?My thoughts

    • @buddahgreat
      @buddahgreat Рік тому

      Don't say that in Cori Bush's fanclub on here, they stated "she's a national hero" when I pointed out her blatant racial agenda to drive a stake further between our people of this nation.

  • @stantheman9072
    @stantheman9072 Рік тому +4

    Competence is a hindrance to them. Obfuscation is a requirement.

  • @zealandzen
    @zealandzen Рік тому +5

    I didn't hear her say anything that shows she understands economics.

  • @jonathanhyde600
    @jonathanhyde600 Рік тому +12

    Equity hires will collapse our entire system xD

  • @OpenSesame858
    @OpenSesame858 Рік тому +11

    What are your qualifications?
    I'm black, I'm gay, and today I identify as a woman, but my pronouns are xe, and hir.....
    Wow, you are eminently qualified!!

  • @tony-gy2bq
    @tony-gy2bq Рік тому +2

    maybe she could qualify as a greeter at MacDonalds.

  • @calvinjohnstone2664
    @calvinjohnstone2664 Рік тому +3

    ' that's not answering the question. '
    It's a Biden nominee. They should expect it by now. 😒

  • @howarddaduck9661
    @howarddaduck9661 Рік тому +584

    "Senator, that's your analysis."
    No, those are the numbers. That is the data. That is what happened.

    • @markportnoy6290
      @markportnoy6290 Рік тому +12

      He actually said his numbers were from an analysis.

    • @mattydominic4219
      @mattydominic4219 Рік тому +37

      They're used to using "my truth" not The Truth.

    • @kandipoopipants1794
      @kandipoopipants1794 Рік тому +27

      She is the government, you believe her cause she's black? His job is to make sure the government is following legislations laws

    • @lizzieb6311
      @lizzieb6311 Рік тому +20

      @@markportnoy6290 Definition of ANALYSIS: DETAILED EXAMINATION OF THE ELEMENT(S) STRUCTURE OF SOMETHING . Try again BOT 🤡🙄

    • @josemorrasge8100
      @josemorrasge8100 Рік тому +30

      She left out 0ne Democrat talking point, Donald Trump

  • @fjbsdoa1976
    @fjbsdoa1976 Рік тому +2

    The smirk says it all

  • @StLuke-br1ij
    @StLuke-br1ij Рік тому +21

    Was anyone else waiting for her to say, "that math is racist"?????

  • @JuckFoeBurden
    @JuckFoeBurden Рік тому +7

    Another box checker, that knows ZERO about her job.

  • @mikepjersey
    @mikepjersey Рік тому +212

    It's scary that she doesn't understand how the world economy works.

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 Рік тому

      All those countries she claims have it worse, doubled down on the stupid ideas of biden is why it is worse. They never got out of the paris accords, they never dropped the iran deal.

    • @stevesteve8098
      @stevesteve8098 Рік тому +20

      She does... but her job is Black lesbian reparation rhetoric, not actually running a country...

    • @heron6462
      @heron6462 Рік тому +11

      Clearly she's just a figurehead, not an actual manager.

    • @savannah505
      @savannah505 Рік тому +3

      Kinda reminds you of AOC ...... doesn't it??? And that was AOC's major.........LOL.

    • @josephgaviota
      @josephgaviota Рік тому

      @@savannah505 AOC should demand her money back for her degree in economics. Clearly she got nothing.

  • @Juliet475
    @Juliet475 Рік тому +1

    Does she even consider that Corporations have operating costs? I would like to have her understand EXACTLY how complicated Corporation taxes are?

  • @patcusick8322
    @patcusick8322 Рік тому +2

    That budget should be getting cut not increasing!

  • @mrspp1846
    @mrspp1846 Рік тому +8

    You are blowing her mind with numbers and facts….she only has rhetoric

  • @lambibi414
    @lambibi414 Рік тому +9

    She is clueless!

  • @klars3207
    @klars3207 Рік тому +7

    Love when they talk about how great things are going to be in ten years.

    • @williamwilkins3084
      @williamwilkins3084 Рік тому

      And I remember they were doing that same thing ten years ago.

  • @Real_Question_Marked
    @Real_Question_Marked Рік тому +9

    She’s not thinking about inflation because she gets 100k a year minimum salary alone. Lmfao.

    • @scottburns2600
      @scottburns2600 Рік тому

      Lefty politicians are like TV evegalists to their constituents. Silver-tongue them to death to get elected and become millionaires in the process

  • @patrickcoreilly
    @patrickcoreilly Рік тому +178

    You got to put it up on a chart like a game show and have her come on down and move the dial where she wants.

    • @leakybean501
      @leakybean501 Рік тому +4

      🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @federalistpapers4523
      @federalistpapers4523 Рік тому

      D's are never satisfied, enough is never enough. Only when all Americans are impoverished, will they be satisfied. Quite simply, they are nuttier than a Payday bar.

    • @josephcrowley3460
      @josephcrowley3460 Рік тому

      If Katie Porter brings her white board, Johnson the man that pretends totalks to his phone when he’s caught lying. She’d eat Johnson and spit em out. He’s an asshat

    • @obsidianet
      @obsidianet Рік тому +2

      LMAO it’s getting to be that way.

    • @michaelkonopka9607
      @michaelkonopka9607 Рік тому +1

      Tosha

  • @davearnold748
    @davearnold748 Рік тому +6

    Shalanda needs a bit more education in math, such as, up is higher and down is lower. If we have a policy that makes things go up, how does the same policy make things go down ? At some point, there has to be a change in policy. Since the policy covers a period 10 years, it sounds to me that the deficit will be way above our heads. This is a question I asked my 12 year old grand daughter and she said everything will go up ! I'm going to have her apply for a job as OMB director as soon as she's 18 years old !

  • @monteevans2874
    @monteevans2874 Рік тому +2

    What happens when Affirmative Action put's people in office , who are not qualified to shine your shoes

  • @sameyeam5277
    @sameyeam5277 Рік тому +53

    Metrics? You want her to use metrics? You are asking her to use numbers? That is not going to happen.

    • @robertbrooks3917
      @robertbrooks3917 Рік тому

      She’s a f***ing liar, denialist, and downright idiot. Just towing the Biden line. Lie, and keep lying, no matter what facts she is presented with.

    • @walte153
      @walte153 Рік тому

      Metrics? Uh... metrics.... uh... METRICS ARE RACIST !

    • @henryrodgers1752
      @henryrodgers1752 Рік тому +2

      "Num-bahs? Ain't nobody got time fo' num-bahs 'n' shee-iit

    • @samfrancisco8095
      @samfrancisco8095 Рік тому

      I'm the 50th thumbs up.

  • @williammills8953
    @williammills8953 Рік тому +62

    They can't just answer a simple yes/no question. They have to give a whole scenario to get around the truth of the matter.

    • @georgehatzimanolakis1904
      @georgehatzimanolakis1904 Рік тому +1

      what is the percent they should pay? yes?

    • @williammills8953
      @williammills8953 Рік тому

      What do you think?

    • @williammills8953
      @williammills8953 Рік тому

      @george hatzimanolakis by the way. I'm not the one that needs to know this stuff. Apparently they should know.

    • @georgehatzimanolakis1904
      @georgehatzimanolakis1904 Рік тому

      @@williammills8953 why should they? The truth is that there is no magic percent. The truth is also, how much would taxation be if nobody scammed it. Do we have a debt problem? Only if we can't cut where we most definitely can. Also, It doesn't matter if it your job or not, if you post it, there will be dudes like me who like to make fun of people for not having an answer "you or the politician like". Picture a scenario where the government successfully takes 10% tax from everyone and they have enough money to fix a lot of schools and build public housing. In 5 years, will that 10% be required? I bet you after 10 years, you can cut more than you started with because so much help was just given. This is a hypothetical, there is no right answer here.

    • @HondoTrailside
      @HondoTrailside Рік тому

      With properly prepared questions, if they give a yes or no answer, it isn't as though that is the end of it. The senators get to ask the real questions in private sessions. This stuff is 100% political. A good prosecutor is always setting a trap. At a certain level, if you can't stonewall the questions, you aren't up to the job.

  • @u686st7
    @u686st7 Рік тому +1

    No one will ever give a straight answer as to what a "fair share" is.

  • @hawkeyeted
    @hawkeyeted Рік тому +8

    This is what happens when you have Keynesian economists running the budget.

  • @frank53719
    @frank53719 Рік тому +109

    As always, the fiscal problem is not in the revenues,...it's in the run-away spending of this administration....

    • @jill7759
      @jill7759 Рік тому

      Indeed, and maybe we could STOP growing both entitlements without any work requirement and STOP. growing the already massive federal bureaucracy without any ability to EVER get rid of any of them. They are arguing, right now, in other hearings about federal employees who, now that the pandemic has finally been declared over, don’t want to return to their offices. As has been pointed out, employees in the private sector who don’t show up to work get fired. Now there are plans, in multiple sectors to spend millions trying to figure out why people don’t want to return to work. It’s absurd, of course they won’t want to get out of their pjs if they are allowed to get away with that and you’re fired is a lot cheaper than all this snowflakery.

    • @georgehatzimanolakis1904
      @georgehatzimanolakis1904 Рік тому

      it's actually exactly half, they're over spending by a trillion because they are missing half of their revenue which equates to over spending by half

  • @edwhite7457
    @edwhite7457 Рік тому +15

    How can they forcast 10 yrs ahead when they even see clearly what is going on in front of their eyes? #DamnDems

    • @josemorrasge8100
      @josemorrasge8100 Рік тому

      That's a gimmick Democrats love to use, project it out 10 years to justify any bill 'in their own Mind ' when the actual numbers are in, it's doubled

  • @davidnikoloff3211
    @davidnikoloff3211 Рік тому +3

    He asks a question for a specific amount that would be “far” and she only responds with rhetorics

  • @invictusbp1prop143
    @invictusbp1prop143 Рік тому

    Every American should see and consider this exchange.

  • @09flstcmcodonnell42
    @09flstcmcodonnell42 Рік тому +52

    If she's qualified to run the cash register at Walmart it's no wonder they have us doing it ourself

    • @onetwo1163
      @onetwo1163 Рік тому +2

      Hahahahaha

    • @tommyanderson4274
      @tommyanderson4274 Рік тому

      U must be a Graduate of Trump Academy;Maybe you received a Scholarship from the Trump Foundation

    • @poolmonkey7479
      @poolmonkey7479 Рік тому

      @@tommyanderson4274 …you voted for a pedophile? Why would you vote for a pedophile?…he’s not going to make it legal, poor you.

  • @easyyog1185
    @easyyog1185 Рік тому +78

    Thank You Senator Johnson.
    oh dear. always somewhere out of lane, over there, someone else, global, or decades away. But Never an Answer.

  • @Tatanka7739
    @Tatanka7739 Рік тому +1

    He gets a better response talking to a wall. She is clueless.

  • @davidhavens745
    @davidhavens745 Рік тому

    This needs to go viral!

  • @StepUPNJ
    @StepUPNJ Рік тому +68

    Deficit reduction is the most ridiculous argument that you can make. It's like saying well last year I went into debt by $30,000 and this year I only went into debt by 25,000.

    • @tedzink4574
      @tedzink4574 Рік тому +8

      She jumped to 2033 in her deficit reduction malarkey, that's just guessing, isn't real.

    • @samfrancisco8095
      @samfrancisco8095 Рік тому +3

      Making you total debt $55,000, She doesn't seem to be able to grasp that math.

    • @georgehatzimanolakis1904
      @georgehatzimanolakis1904 Рік тому

      that makes sense by your numbers because eventually the debt grows by nothing

    • @GlebNerzhin
      @GlebNerzhin Рік тому

      🎯

    • @laggismaximus
      @laggismaximus Рік тому +2

      @@samfrancisco8095 but it's a $5,000 deficit reduction!!!! LOL

  • @jayv3264
    @jayv3264 Рік тому +26

    Can’t answer a simple question she’s thought long and hard about for years and repeated ad nauseum. 😂

  • @kevingriggs4249
    @kevingriggs4249 Рік тому +1

    If I answered like that my parents would beat the shit out of me.

  • @arnanon6473
    @arnanon6473 Рік тому +3

    We are looking at the face of career, bureaucratic failure, when an administration hires people on Diversity-Equity-Inclusion, rather than competency. Americans suffer the damages of these people's incompetency, but those in power don't care.

  • @WTSTF378
    @WTSTF378 Рік тому +2

    If we're playing the game of Monopoly... Shalanda CAN'T be the banker

  • @meauxgeaux
    @meauxgeaux Рік тому +32

    she wants to say 100%

    • @daveminer9217
      @daveminer9217 Рік тому

      Well, she knows she would sound ridiculous admitting that in public, so she'd likely say 99%, and throw in a judgement that 1% should be enough for "the rich" to live on....excluding of course, any politicians or wealthy beuracrats!

    • @mjanny6330
      @mjanny6330 Рік тому +1

      She wants to say "all the whytes money!"

  • @JB-no1hy
    @JB-no1hy Рік тому +65

    If every single country does the exact same thing (prints a bunch of money and raises their deficits) then global inflation goes up

    • @PaulStringini
      @PaulStringini Рік тому

      That's right. That's why I ask what is all this bullshit about taxing the rich? I thought they had just settled on taxing us poor folks by printing more money. They do it over and over.

    • @kencleg7721
      @kencleg7721 Рік тому

      A state in Africa did exactly the same bread at the market is 20,000 what ever the money is. Inflation and devalue of there currencies

    • @seashells5181
      @seashells5181 Рік тому +1

      But, what American haters don’t realize is, where America goes, so goes the world. As bad as it is here it’s worse in other parts. Besides. I’m not interested in the Global thing. I’m interested in what’s happening to My Country

    • @georgehatzimanolakis1904
      @georgehatzimanolakis1904 Рік тому

      that would be correct but the point was, your printing doesn't effect my inflation which is mostly accurate

  • @princesspiplaysbass
    @princesspiplaysbass Рік тому +1

    They won't be happy until they get it all.

  • @robertschaaf7192
    @robertschaaf7192 Рік тому +1

    It’s a number, just say a number.

  • @al9030
    @al9030 Рік тому +8

    TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED

  • @mwmann
    @mwmann Рік тому +124

    She's unqualified it's obvious for her job. She is qualified to operate a cash register at Walmart I'm guessing ?

    • @kurtwilliams1859
      @kurtwilliams1859 Рік тому +1

      Says the guy who looks like he works at walmart.

    • @tomjohnson3610
      @tomjohnson3610 Рік тому

      @@kurtwilliams1859 working at Walmart is still better compared to your mom working on her knees.

    • @JohnAPrins
      @JohnAPrins Рік тому +15

      That might be too much for her, she cant even give a numeric determination of "fair share" so I am pretty sure she doesn't actually understand numbers and is just parroting whenever she uses them.

    • @momof2240
      @momof2240 Рік тому

      No, republicans never ask good faith questions. It’s never based in actual information. He literally told her he didn’t want her to see the numbers he found somewhere but wanted her to respond to a question that wasn’t based in accurate information.

    • @paul8409
      @paul8409 Рік тому +10

      ​@@kurtwilliams1859 says the guy who hasn't left his mommys basement except to get his nappy changed EVER.

  • @leoncardinal2035
    @leoncardinal2035 Рік тому +4

    It just amazes me how people like this woman be so completely inadequate to answer a question. They should be jailed.

    • @megamus3
      @megamus3 Рік тому

      She's good enough for the Biden voters.

  • @paulhastings6052
    @paulhastings6052 Рік тому +1

    Chevy Chase: "I was told there would be no math"

  • @simonshiels1
    @simonshiels1 Рік тому +8

    Can't answer....won't answer!

  • @Elazar40
    @Elazar40 Рік тому +17

    Falsehood is always a test for Truth. Truth, is the active component.

  • @johngaller278
    @johngaller278 Рік тому +1

    I didn't know Sen. Johnson was questioning Charlie Brown's teacher... Whaa WA waa waaa wa waa WA .

  • @timothywalker8873
    @timothywalker8873 Рік тому +8

    God help Us, We are surrounded by Idiots.

  • @PageMarker1
    @PageMarker1 Рік тому +38

    Rumour has it Lori Lightfoot is infatuated with Shalanda.

  • @michealray4895
    @michealray4895 Рік тому +1

    The problem is not the tax rate, but rather it's the loopholes that provide room for tax avoidance.

    • @kathyflorcruz552
      @kathyflorcruz552 Рік тому

      Nope. It IS the unfair tax rates. We shouldn't even HAVE 99% of these taxes AT ALL. If there weren't loopholes most people wouldn't have ANYTHING left after the ILLEGAL IRS got through with them. The more money you bring in the MORE THEY TAKE, AND WASTE. The IRS needs to be abolished like 90% of the federal government & it's "free" programs.

  • @mikmik9034
    @mikmik9034 Рік тому +1

    A budget is not money spent, it is a request for money to be spent. The Department I worked for EVERY YEAR the Director made sure to spend every penny (so as not to have a surplus), and asked for 15% more, and would accept 10% more 'saving' 5% each year.

  • @darlenegoodall7797
    @darlenegoodall7797 Рік тому +17

    They will never be satisfied with taxing people until they have nothing left

    • @georgehatzimanolakis1904
      @georgehatzimanolakis1904 Рік тому

      maybe but even 99% tax would leave them with more than what the majority of people have. So on the way to that percent, we can eventually find a way to make all americans productive with equal accessibility to reach that ability.

    • @hardcoredoom5892
      @hardcoredoom5892 Рік тому

      We're already taxed substantially more than when we were under British rule. We should've revolted when the gold standard was terminated.
      We should revolt now.

    • @smythharris2635
      @smythharris2635 Рік тому

      You are assuming they desire to be productive.

  • @Shadowcruise99
    @Shadowcruise99 Рік тому +47

    *The vast majority of the "1%" avoid paying taxes by borrowing against their investments, rather than liquidating them. Loans are not considered taxable income and as long as the interest or capital gains on their investments are greater than the interest on the loan, they have a positive benefit. This concept of "taxing the rich" is a red herring and frankly a distraction and a complete waist of time!*

    • @mick8888V
      @mick8888V Рік тому +1

      Perhaps we put a limit to borrowing against investments then.

    • @easein
      @easein Рік тому +3

      @@mick8888V Perhaps we just go full J. Stalin?

    • @Freedomschild195
      @Freedomschild195 Рік тому

      Well with rising interest rates and depressed stock values, that plan may not be working out so well these days.

    • @mick8888V
      @mick8888V Рік тому

      Yeah...let's just try taxing the bastards anyway and see if that ol Boogeyman of unemployment rise is real. Worth trying something different than the last 60 years.

    • @samfrancisco8095
      @samfrancisco8095 Рік тому +1

      You had me until "Waist vs WASTE." Work on that.

  • @conniemartin284
    @conniemartin284 Рік тому

    They’re not going to acknowledge anything!

  • @warrenbaker4826
    @warrenbaker4826 Рік тому +8

    Does anyone in the Biden admin know what they are doing?

  • @stacyreich3783
    @stacyreich3783 Рік тому +18

    I love facts!! Government should only speak with facts we can all see are true. Follow the actual data not lies and talking points.

    • @mick8888V
      @mick8888V Рік тому

      Data is massaged in many fashions to support endless intentions.

  • @glenparker234
    @glenparker234 Рік тому +1

    That woman is TOTALLY unqualified to be anywhere near a budget! She has absolutely no idea of the basics of economics. I learned more in the first week of economics 101 than she appears to understand.

  • @larcoal2963
    @larcoal2963 Рік тому +1

    She's simply not selling her product. No common sense financial analysis would say the proposed spending is heading toward a "reduction".

  • @Diogenes425
    @Diogenes425 Рік тому +5

    Do we really want people like that in those positions?

  • @acetaste5491
    @acetaste5491 Рік тому +10

    What that tells us is they're responsible for many other nations suffering as well as ours

  • @pixxz4737
    @pixxz4737 Рік тому +1

    What it tells me is WEF is in every government.

  • @bobbywall172
    @bobbywall172 10 місяців тому +1

    Who put this girl in charge of anything, does she know 2+2=4

  • @fredgullett6060
    @fredgullett6060 Рік тому +3

    don't forget the interest will eat up the gain

  • @tropics8407
    @tropics8407 Рік тому +84

    Bring on those Nobel prize winning economists to talk.

    • @disconductorder
      @disconductorder Рік тому +16

      FAA admin nominee: never flew a plane
      Transportation secretary: was fed agent and mayor
      vice president: smoked weed with Tupac?
      Homeland security: wants to remove all hurdles to entering US
      President: Blackmailed into supporting phase 1 of WWIII
      Treasury sec: tells israel to get its money out of SVB bank before it fails next day before US citizens remove theirs
      Nuclear secretary assistant: Man who dresses as woman and steals womens luggage
      US military: pays to cut your dick off and put a dress on
      At this point we can only assume they want us to try to revolt so they have pretext to remove 1st and 2nd ammednment

    • @littlehollow
      @littlehollow Рік тому +7

      @@disconductorder I hate that everything you just wrote is a 100% accurate.

    • @Mazzpp98
      @Mazzpp98 Рік тому +2

      @@disconductorder the question I have is whether the US military would turn on its own people if a revolt were to take place.
      The final nail in the coffin of the Soviet Union was their military refusing to turn on its own people.

    • @brians7181
      @brians7181 Рік тому

      @@Mazzpp98 Some would, I think most wouldn't. That is one of the reasons our current government is going full speed ahead to woke-ify the military. They want to purge all normal and patriotic people.

    • @maryfries2147
      @maryfries2147 Рік тому +1

      To bad Milton freedman is still alive,Mr Johnson and Milton would be able to answer every question, and could have a real conversation

  • @JerryDLTN
    @JerryDLTN Рік тому +1

    Her eyes are glossing over because she failed math in school

  • @johnholliday5874
    @johnholliday5874 Рік тому

    Just won't answer because they are NEVER satisfied.

  • @williammcguire5685
    @williammcguire5685 Рік тому +9

    Never enough for them.

  • @tdaveniii
    @tdaveniii Рік тому +4

    The number is 100%. She's just afraid to say it.

  • @tenchraven
    @tenchraven Рік тому +1

    The past two years, it like actually answering a question is something goerment officials aren't allowed to do. I wonder what happened?

  • @ChadElk88
    @ChadElk88 Рік тому +7

    It's literally like trying to reason with play-doh.

  • @honest1296
    @honest1296 Рік тому +5

    She only has one data point in her arsenal of knowledge.

  • @prittsybaby
    @prittsybaby Рік тому +11

    Maybe consider just closing some loopholes instead of increasing the percentages?

  • @davidfrey5654
    @davidfrey5654 Рік тому

    Every time I see I watch these questionings it's all about 'HOW CAN AVOID ANSWERING THE PERSON'S QUESTION.

  • @jasonshiflet8486
    @jasonshiflet8486 Рік тому

    GODBLESS YOU SIR I LOVE YOU AND HONOR YOU ❤️

  • @dlo7573
    @dlo7573 Рік тому +12

    Thank you for adding the date on your videos. Too many people passing old stuff as new.

  • @kandipoopipants1794
    @kandipoopipants1794 Рік тому +8

    As if she knows anything above fractions.. she is the government. He is simply making sure the laws are being followed

  • @marksundstrom1593
    @marksundstrom1593 Рік тому

    Why doesn’t the chairman MAKE them answer these questions?

  • @cryptidnomad3850
    @cryptidnomad3850 Рік тому +2

    More fuzzy numbers from deliberate fuzzy brains

  • @Oldman5261
    @Oldman5261 Рік тому +47

    “In ten years the President’s budget budget will bring the deficit down by 3 trillion dollars.” Okay, got it. And at that time in the future then what will be our total accumulated debt? “Oh about 50 trillion dollars.” Okay got it. And what percentage of our budget will go to servicing the deficit? “Oh, maybe 75 to 100%.” Got it. Makes perfect sense to me!

    • @gunner1534
      @gunner1534 Рік тому +2

      Had the same thought. Was looking to see if anyone had already made this comment.

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 Рік тому +7

      When you have to borrow money to pay the interest on the money you borrowed they have a financial term for it. It is called BANKRUPT.

    • @gregs42768
      @gregs42768 Рік тому +4

      Its been the Democrat way since their inception, their idea of "lowering the deficit" is by not spending as much as they wanted. So instead of raising the debt by 25T over 10 years it only goes up by 22T....just like my wife says "see, I saved you money"!!

    • @emiltoutou1
      @emiltoutou1 Рік тому

      Got it!!

    • @samfrancisco8095
      @samfrancisco8095 Рік тому

      @@gregs42768 I saved 38% on this unnecessary expenditure, honey. We can never have enough of these requiring us to now rent a storage unit to keep it all. She spent your paper gain on your investments. Realistically, you didn't lose as much in your portfolio because she already spent it before the drop.

  • @ArizonaBasement
    @ArizonaBasement Рік тому +4

    The real answer - "we won't ever be satisfied - take it all" :^(

  • @mudderjen
    @mudderjen Рік тому +1

    Federal taxes are exactly what is being referred to! When confronted with facts and data they absolutely have zero clue what to do!

  • @larrryd63
    @larrryd63 Рік тому +1

    WTF she blamed on global inflation that effect to Us ?