Core i5 14400F vs Core i5 14500 vs Core i5 14600K - Test in 8 Games
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 чер 2024
- Core i5 14400F vs Core i5 14500 vs Core i5 14600K l 1080p
Buy games at the best prices on gamivo.com - gvo.deals/TestingGames
Use coupon code and get discount - TG3
Ad - 0:00
Games :
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 0:06 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Hogwarts Legacy - 1:14 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Starfield - 2:15
Horizon Forbidden West - 3:23
Forza Horizon 5 - 4:28 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 5:42 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 6:41
The Witcher 3 - 7:46 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesWitcher
System:
Windows 11
Core i5 14400F - bit.ly/3Sed1r4
Core i5 14500 - bit.ly/4aXkIZt
Core i5 14600K - bit.ly/45BZPQ4
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
32Gb RAM DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI - Ігри
Games :
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 0:06 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Hogwarts Legacy - 1:14 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Starfield - 2:15
Horizon Forbidden West - 3:23
Forza Horizon 5 - 4:28 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 5:42 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 6:41
The Witcher 3 - 7:46 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesWitcher
System:
Windows 11
Core i5 14400F - bit.ly/3Sed1r4
Core i5 14500
Core i5 14600K - bit.ly/45BZPQ4
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
32Gb RAM DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Thanks bro! Was looking for a comparison of this sort. Keep up the good work 👍
Keep in mind that this test has been made in 1080p with a 4090, which means that a lower tier gpu or a higher resolution would make the difference minimal.
I paired my 4070 with an i5 14500 for 1440p and its perfect.
14500 vs 13600K would be interesting comparison imo.
13600K is like 14600K minus 1 fps
If you OC 13600K then it's technically 15600K
14500 would be slower since 14th gen is only 1-2 fps faster than 13th
@@club4ghzand if you OC 14600K it's technically 16600K
Or 14500 vs 12700K.
Hi @TestingGames What was the ambient temperature of the room?
Thanks i am searching this ❤
the 14600 (non k) is the most interesting one cause the extra cache so similar to the 14600k... but is impossible to get it seems.
Those are non-existent at this point
Doesn't the 14500 feature 5Ghz turbo on the P-cores according to Intel's website? It's only 4.6Ghz here. However the 14600k is 5.3Ghz as advertised. Something isn't right here.
the 14600 is unlocked, so you can basically force all the cores to whatever speed you can get. On the other hand, the 14500 is not unlocked and will only reach 5ghz turbo in a single core.. something that never happens really because there arent games or anything that only uses a core... it is a marketing thing.. that is why... it is the same for every non K cpu, they never reach the max turbo.. unless you are trying some very specific benchmark designed to pull just from 1 core...
@@Trikipumthere are games that only use a single core lol. Also, it should be boosting a few cores to the maximum turbo boost, maybe the clockspeed in the overlay is just an average.
@@Trikipumyes correct.
I have RTX 4080 SUPER on 1440p ULTRA, DLSS Quality - Starfield - 2:15 AVG 100 FPS 😇Thx.
can i replace my I3 12100 by a I5 14500 in my H610 or the I5 14500 will be limited ?
It will run games fine, but if you start running Cinebench or rendering with it then the frequencies will scale back to the PL1 power limit.
@@m8x425 Ty for your help
Maybe you should consider 14400f
Bad idea
I5 14500 seems like the sweet spot. The price increase doesn't really justify the 14600k
Unfortunately, it's price over the i7-12700k and KF aren't. Most of the time the 12700k is a better value, and sometimes it can be found for cheaper.
Core i5 14400F vs Core i9 11900k please bro
14400f it’s much newer
@@Purqlthat doesn't mean anything in today's CPU market. 13th gen is nearly the same as 14th gen but cheaper. Also the i5 has way less cores than the i9, so even if it's older it could still push more performance in certain cases.
@@Fusion05 Try to actually do some research next time before you go and spread misinformation, because the 14400f actually has 2 more cores than the 11900k.
The only thing that's meaningless in today's CPU market is CPU number designations, at least when it comes to Intel. Case in point: the 14400f outperforms the 10th gen i9 and all previous gen i9s, and performs on par with the 11900k. Check CPUbenchmark if you don't believe me. The 11900k's only advantage is its higher turbo speed compared to the 14400f (5.2Ghz vs 4.7), which is negated by the fact that all i9 CPUs consume massive amounts of power and get really hot.
The 11900k has a max TDP of 251 Watts when running at turbo speeds, requiring a decent AIO cooler at minimum, and those aren't cheap. In comparison, a 14400f has a base TDP of 65 Watts and a turbo TDP of 148. You could get away with using the stock cooler and you'd be fine, and you'd get even more performance by spending a measly 30 dollars on an air cooler.
The "midrange" i5s of today outperform the high end i9s and i7s from just a few generations ago. You can't just judge a CPUs performance based entirely off of the arbitrary number Intel gives it. The fact that 14th gen is literally just rebinned 13th gen CPUs proves this. Everything I said about the 14400f applies to the 13400f as well, since the 14400f is literally just a factory overclocked 13400f (4.7Ghz vs 4.6 turbo clock). Don't let Intel's numbering system fool you. Think for yourself.
What cooling are you using my man? My i5 14400F never works below 60 celsius
it says on the description CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
turn on intel default settings in the bios. watch jaystwocentz video on it
Thanks you .
Can't decide between 14500 & 7600 ( I have 4060)
I have a 14500 and it's worth the buy. Fast with low power consumption
What motherboard do you have ?
14600 non-k vs 13600k
I support it
50 watts of power for 20 more frames?
Yes
O mais equilibrado é o 14500 bom desempenho e gasto de energia bom.
E bom preço.
@@tailung5679 pena que no Brasil não tem os varejos só querem nos obrigar a comprar ou o 14600k ou a versão kf
Mas vou te dizer, se aparecer por 1600/1700 reais numa promoção compensa muito o 14600k viu, é um i5 cavalo demais pra jogar
@@dualsensoRj de fato, porém eu olho também a minha conta de energia kkkkkk, para o brasileiro o jeito é pegar o 13600k ou o 14600k.
Estou pensando em trocar meu I5 13400F por um I5 14600K mas estou numa duvida cruel pois terei em média 20% de desempenho a mais e não sei se compensa esse upgrade. Acho que o I5 14600k conseguirá empurrar o hardware melhor pois tenho o I5 13400F, Placa mãe B760M, RTX 4060TI 8GB e 32GB DDR5 6000.
is am4 worth it nowadays?
Yes and no. If you just want a strong budget build am4 is pretty good. But if you're looking to upgrade down the line it won't be possible.
do 12700 vs 14500
13500 vs 14500 please
I5 13500 vs 14500 pls!
i5 14500 or i5 13600k? What is better?
13600k but hotter
@@armoversion With my noctua nh-u12s cooler, it seems that the maximum I can buy is an i5 14500. Previously, I used an i7 4790k on it and it was ok, but it was an old processor. Now I'm using i5 12400f.
@@ztejstronymarcin i'm going to buy 14500 also. The CPU is only 15% slower than 13600k, but it's way cooler. Therefore I recommend it. IMO price for performance is really great
@@ztejstronymarcin i'll buy Deep cool AK500 for the cpu
@@ztejstronymarcin with your cpu i'd rather wait for the new intel gen and buy it
i9 13900KS vs i9 14900KS
14500 is actually an interesting option
no not really, you can get a 13600k thatll be faster and be within 1-2 fps of the 14600k. but ryzen 7000 is a better choice rn
ryzen 7000 also costs with 100$ more@@Definedd
@@xRlly no, a ryzen 5 7600 is cheaper than a 14500 for example and will be faster. you also have the benefit of longevity of the socket, guaranteed atleast 1-2 more generations
r5 7600 is 270Euro in my country and the i5-14500 is 217 euro.@@Definedd
nah, 14500 just 12600k plus more e-cores, a lot of people don't know intel doing scam in both 13 and 14 gen( 13 gen only 13600k or higher, 14gen only 14600 higher are 2mb l2 cache per P-core. 13400, 13500 ,13600, 14400 ,14500 are same architectural as 12 gen cpu which only 1.25 mb l2 cache per p-core
Here in North America, I find the i5-14400f and i5-14500 to be hard pills to swallow because they are outpriced by the i5-12600kf and i7-12700k.
In my country every F and none F are at the same price for intel
13500 vs 14500 pls
❤❤❤❤❤❤
4090 vs 4589 vs 5287 Ambelibebal
There is no difference,the difference is only gpu wattage is different different
มันเป็นเกมใหม่ ที่ถูกสร้างมาไม่สมบูรณ์ แบบในตัวของมัน ถูกแยกออกเป็นแฟรมแต่ระยะทำให้ มีการขับดึงด้วย GpuละGpu เพื่อขายที่เรียกว่า กราฟฟิกระยะเพื่อเติมเต็ม ในสิ่งที่ขาดด้วยfps
if you want to play 4k games then cpu won't impact much
@NoSkillsBro I have 4090 on 386sx33. I do 8k gaming no problem.
Intel 🤦♂️.
lol negative improvement from 14400f to 14600k, only ever more wasteful energy usage for minimal results. Pc hardware is pathetic.
14400f > m3 pro.
@@notenjoying666 the mac m3, not possible
It's always been that way, nothing new.
@@m8x425 no not really, since Apple silicone we've seen what is possible. Apple is ahead by a decade almost.
@@Wybrem Ahead in losing markets 🤣.