Apollo 11: The final 13 minutes before the Moon landing - BBC News
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 жов 2024
- The minutes before landing were tense, as connections frequently dropped out between the lunar module, Eagle, and mission control - and it was believed that fuel was running low.
Relive the tense moments as Neil Armstrong manually piloted Eagle towards the surface of the Moon.
Please subscribe HERE bit.ly/1rbfUog
Seems to me they had better mics than half of csgo matchmaking players
ua-cam.com/video/ZFPXjMued9E/v-deo.html
Microphones were designed for top quality back then, rather than size and cheap manufacturing. A pair of old rotary telephones connected via local land lines and the sound quality makes it seem like you are both in the room.
Jaime Warlock interesting
@@JaimeWarlock it was a joke
At 12:46 there are two very tall towers casting long shadows. Bottom 5 Oclock ,
Neil Armstrong alongwith Buzz Aldrin. Why people always forget about him. And Michael Collins in the orbiter. They three are equally responsible for the history they created.
for the lie they perpetrated more like
@@domingohermanos6300 you seriously believe it was a lie? Cmon man!
Who cares what's unamerican.
America was built on blood, slaves and lies. And most of us Americans know that.
Mayank Abhishek - All three are well known.
@@MayankAbhishek27 its a lie. Indeed
6:49 Buzz: “Better than the simulator”
Any pilot can definitely appreciate those words.....
Four days earlier my buddy and I drove from Orlando to the beach to watch the liftoff. One of the highlights of my life.
We recorded it using an old 8 mm home movie camera
that guy Roger (Rog) seemed very important in this... but he never gets mentioned or even thanks in the history books ... 😏
Roger that Ginny Vee .
Ol Rog doesn't do it for the gory, he does it for the people
😅copy that!
true, but most people only have the capacity to remember a key name over a long period of time. I think it ended up being Armstrong as the commander and the pilot in charge of their lives
He's a lot like Captain Tuttle of the 4077th MASH U.S. Army unit in Korea.
50 years ago I was playing with puppies, my parents called me away to watch the Moon Landing. After, I immediately went back to the puppies. Priorities. We all have 'em. Grateful for both experiences.
At least the puppies were real.
ARE THEY DEAD NOW
xApathy : parents yes. Puppies yes. Life is a river. It moves on.
@@redelfshotthefood8213 good response
@@G-ra-ha-m Conspiracy theorist
The balls on those astronauts the size of comets
have you seen people trying to get buz to swear that he went to the moon? Doesnt take much balls if you are in a film studio faking it to the whole world.
@@CTMoney7 Moron.
This still tears me up. So proud of the dudes with cast-iron balls!
Soggy balls you mean
@@aayushkhandelwal4912 Prove it
Aayush Khandelwal that or they redid videos for better viewing after they landed..I’m still not sure what the truth is, the govt lies so much especially NASA and the damn CIA
@@aayushkhandelwal4912 you people are holding our society back.
@@aayushkhandelwal4912 they burn liquid oxygen as fuel. Also, thrust is created by ejecting mass with momentum opposite that of the intended direction. This is literally rudimentary, classical physics-level stuff.
Two main takeaways:
1) you don't need gaseous oxygen to burn; this isn't a wood fire
2) you don't need an atmosphere for thrust. Airplanes need an atmosphere because they're relying on pressure differential that they create as a means by which to generate both thrust and lift; however, spaceflight involves (essentially) throwing fairly heavy objects (fuel) away from you at a high speed and thus propelling yourself forward
My god the balls these guys must have had. Neil never flinched even with bingo fuel staring him the face. He had probably flown that approach 10000 times in his mind. Ask any test pilot and theyll tell you that overprepared equals underchallenged.
@Underground Evolution Of Hip Hop TV Yes this very True.. They are make in Studio VideoMaker produz...
Welcome to Brazil big Smart On
@Underground Evolution of..
@Underground Evolution Of Hip Hop TV yup but radio hams will show you otherwise, they also tracked the landing
America 1969: Let’s land on the moon
America 2019: I don’t know what gender I am
Holly13 Satre89 Racist fuck
America 2020: let's see who the first attack chopper will be on the moon
Holly13 Satre89 Doesn’t matter. You’re still a sheep
Holly13 Satre89 This is why we need to enforce Natural Selection; the sheeple have to die off
@Holly13 Satre89 congrats on the mongoloids getting to the moon.
What amazes me is that we watch this on our smartphones with technology that used to fit into an entire room
But even so we haven't the courage to do what they did. Health and safety.
@@stephenkeay1868 Hello and quite agree with you,Health n Safety gone mad. Can't do anything now must be in a bubble and I'm fed up of political people who have been to public school bossing me around. Kind regards Glynn n greetings from Stourbridge West Midlands UK 🤝
This is excellent. Once again the BBC is the bar!
And this also explains why no-one named Roger has ever worked for NASA... :)
Either that or nearly every one that works there is a Roger!
@@rickh3714 Shirley, you jest!
Roger B. Chaffee
@@WildthingSwelling001 Yes, thank you!
Is your name not Roger? That's going to cause a little confusion. Mind if we call you "Roger" to keep it clear?
Imagine what the Mars landing will be like.
Van Allen radiation belts.
Looool Landing where?. No one ain’t landing anywhere
None of this. It will be fully automated.
Wonder who'll direct that movie and if They'll film it on Devon Island?
I nominate Ridley Scott for that production.
50 years ago, My brother, dad and I were coming back from camping and heard the Eagle had landed while we were in the car. When we got home we watched Neil Armstrong take his first steps on the moon. It was amazing! I was so disappointed later when they canceled the last Apollo moon missions. It was just stupid and political. We should have kept up the effort.
We really only had to go once. We crushed the Soviet will with the first landing. They knew we'd beaten them then.
Great Video , BBC. Sure would have felt epic when it was live telecasted...
I was eight years old when I saw it live on TV in Hong Kong.
@Jake Lamoureaux Not in 1969.
It was such an EPIC, history defining event that NASA destroyed the lunar video tape and telemetry data and even today refuses to show a single uncut film of any Apollo/Saturn launch from lift-off to staging so we can verify the speed/vs time profile. On top of that all the rocks in the photos show signs of earth weather being dust free and worn smooth.
@@G-ra-ha-m tin foil hat club
@@williamjordan5554 You are the one ignoring the evidence that it was faked, not me.
Even without any background music this video is so excellent...
I’m happy there isn’t any background music
Neil Armstrong was the best man for that mission. All three men were America's best. Neil was a cool and very smart man showed no fear. He said we have a job to do.
Really great video thank you BBC!
Thank you BBC for the footage.
The news in 2154
NASA - "We're finally going back to the moon in 2160."
Yeah NASA's programs keep getting cancelled. Private companies like SpaceX will get there first.
@@spidermain nope
@@masterbetty3020 A few hours after you commented this, SpaceX Starhopper (starship development vehicle) flew for the first time. SpaceX is making visible (via fan photos) progress to Mars and Moon every day.
Only when they get another german engineer lol
Your podcast was the best thing to celebrate the moon landing, thx so much!
Jake Lamoureaux racist
My dad was only ten years old when he saw the moon landing live on TV.
Stephen Murphy damn
My dad was ten too.
@@TheLearningChannel-Tech I was 20 !
Badass Skeptic the actual event not this recording
@@stephenmurphy2212
Well then that makes you
I saw it live on black and white TV in 1969 when I was 8 years old.
I saw it on color TV in 1968 when I was 9 years old.
Lar M I did too!! I was 8 years old and mom made me watch it lol. Now I’m so glad she did. 😉
Wow you people are so old!
I only wish the BBC's coverage still existed.
@@franciskebuchi1159 Same thing with all B/W video tapes of Dr. Who...erased. Unlike Dr. Who, however, there was no kinescope/telerecording backup on film. To be fair, in the US, NBC did the same thing. That is why the CBS coverage with Walter Cronkite is shown most of the time.
Mysterious WV Not all of the Doctor Who black and white era tapes were erased. The first episode and a few others were found.
And at the end of the video, they switched on the lights in the studio.
🤣
I SAW IT ONCE AND CAN NEVER RELIVE IT - BUT WOW , I STILL CRY WHEN I THINK OF THE MAJESTY OF THIS EVENT ! - for those who were born after July 20 , 1969 watch it - even then everyone was awestruck ! ( for me I can't believe that after 50 years I still start to involuntarily cry , it's like the old comedy routine ' Niagara Falls ' !
50 years ago, tech was so good they were communicating in real time with no lag or delay in audio or video.
sam sneede your being ironic right lol ?
sam sneede - No, the delay between Earth and the moon is obvious. It’s physics, not the technology. There is no delay between people at Houston.
The coms lag was only about a second and a half. Plus, there's this thing called "editing". SMH.
@Amirah Al- Wehbi The communication lag between Earth and the moon is only about a second and a half.
Believe this then you believe in King Kong
Brings back the great memory. But I was nervous back then. Held my breath the last 4 minutes I think.
This will never be repeated, what I mean by that, in 1969 the astronauts had a very high work load, using a slow computer, reading analogue gauges and switches, flying the last few minutes by hand control etc.
When it happens again in the next few years planned landing, 99.9% of the landing or even 100% will totally be computer automated.
These Apollo men really were the best of the best no doubt about it,
It didn't happen! You're overlooking America's need to win the cold war with Russia. No moon landings have happened since 1972 because it's not possible. The moon landings stopped because it became to easy to spot the deception. In 1963 a citizen recorded the JFK assassination in color on a hand held video camera. In 1969 the wealthiest (taxpayer funded) company in the world sent man to the moon with grainy black and white cameras. "Live " Footage that was easily edited. The image of a tiny earth as seen from the moon. Earth is 6 times larger than the moon. Man landing on the moon with limited technology and zero experience first time and everything is hunky dory. Through the van allen belts (twice) no problem. No one has returned for over 40 years. No probe lands anywhere near the site of the Apollo missions. It's all BS. What is your proof of the moon landings? Edited, grainy black and white footage. Of course we landed on the moon! Lol. Tell me why we haven't been back? It's not because we know all there is to know. Why?
@@jimmyfarley5581 So they managed to fool the Soviets as well?
@@JohnHazenhousen the Soviets know it wasn't possible to land on the moon in 1969. The Soviets did more testing than America. The Soviets beat America on all space tests. First animal in space, first human in space and the first Satellite in space. The Soviets had more experience and had effectively won the space race. America couldn't stand the thought of losing. America had to do the "impossible" to win over Russia. America was desperate for tax dollars to strengthen its armed forces during a cold war. The moon landing was the funding the people were prepared to pay for. Billions of dollars were gained from the people to achieve a near impossible goal of landing on the moon before 1970. Russia didn't entertain the idea ( with its superior knowledge) as it was clearly impossible. America sucked billions out of the public to fund a mission that didn't need to happen. It was all propaganda. The public wouldn't back a war but they would back beating Russia to the moon. Send a rocket into space for many millions. Produce and easily faked grainy black and white video with 60's technology. Pocket the Billions of dollars left over. Fool the world. The rest as they say is history.
America has the people and their money in the palm of its hand. Russia knows it's all BS but has nothing to gain. The west wouldn't believe Russia's claims. America is more financially stable for its armed forces and the cold war eases off. The out spoken , make big changes JFK was assassinated (inside job) so everything died down. Killing JFK changed the course of the cold war. The moon landing was a high five for America. All it did was bring in Billions of dollars. Dollars the public were prepared to give. Russia lost nothing. Check Mate.
Research war time history with countries. It's all deception and money making. Deceive the people. Get their money. People are reluctant to give money towards war.
Get creative. Find other ways of getting the publics money. 9/11. Boston Bombings. The 2007 attacks in London. The terrorist attack Well has run dry. The space race Well has run dry. 2 world wars were about race and ultimately money. Space race. About money. 9/11 etc about money (funny how the terrorists don't attack anymore!) today we have a pandemic. Man made. Guess what? It's all about money. The cost of living is through the roof now. Why? Because our old enemy Russia is thinking of attacking Ukraine. Every government globally lost money as people perished. Now that money must be recovered. How? Invent a story the people will believe. A story that earns money. Like the moon landings of 1969. The story changes. The agenda doesn't.
Wake up!
@@jimmyfarley5581 Dunning, meet Kruger.
@@JohnHazenhousen China, India and Elon musk have sent cars/robots to the moon. "We've landed on Mars for heaven sake! But! None of these super technical, amazing creations are able to show an image of earth at relatively close range. We see Earth from Jupiter. We see earth from millions of miles away. Why don't we see earth nearer? Why don't the current moon rover's land anywhere near the Apollo missions? Why the secretary? It's all BS.
Very professional and got on with the job.. I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experience ON the Moon.. Thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
If you listen to the whole podcast it adds millions to the value of this clip.
I love how Gene Kranz chuckles saying "Telcom" just after Steve Bales YELLS his "Go!" from Guidance. Approx 4:16
You will like this if you haven’t heard it before: ua-cam.com/video/BHIo6qwJarI/v-deo.html
Strange how only a few days before Armstrong couldn’t control a mock up LEM and had to eject to save his life, but here, with no atmosphere he can?
Well, he could and did on Earth multiple times - although yes he did lose control once and could have died. It was a close call. The decision was made not to train anymore on Earth - but the moon has 1/6 gravity and behaves totally differently than on Earth. It acted like a different craft entirely; the physics were totally different.
@thePiercingTruth Of course. Moon conspiracy theories do not hold up to even a basic level of scrutiny.
@thePiercingTruth ! OK then, if you truly think that then please argue with substance rather than vague, patronising insults. You haven't commented on my original post which contains many facts you could dispute if you choose to. I'm particularly interested by how biology as a field relates to all this. Presumably you will drag up some old, tired, totally discredited van Allen belt stuff?
@thePiercingTruth Obviously, they exist. There was a question about whether they were too dangerous to pass through. Are you on the (firmly discredited) side that they were/are?
This futur is so disappointing. At that time I was 15 and thought that by this time we would have colonies in Mars.
Maybe you could be the one to get us there 🤷♂️
You should have read Marx. We can't have truly advanced future until capitalism is overthrown.
Because it was all faked... A NASA engineer on a NASA video said they would need to solve the problem of passing through the Van Allen radiation belts before going to the moon. Which is a large area of solar radiation which surround the Earth for 3000 miles in every direction. Yet they supposedly did it more then once in the late 60s to the 70's without any radiation shielding in any of their craft. This radiation is highly lethal and consists of gamma, xray and other solar radiations that if exposed to for a short amount of time would kill any living thing without protection. So NASA admitted they never went, just did it in a subtle way.
you're an idiot.
@@dracarys4767 All I gotta say is you are an idiot.
I really wish we would make it to Mars in my lifetime - just to wait for that thirty-minute delay as the communications travel back to earth. The visuals would just be unbelievable. I know it’s very expensive and very dangerous but that spirit of invention was astonishing. Bravo to all of the brave cosmonauts who advanced the space tech as well.
“Do what thou wilt” except travel to Space because Space doesn’t exist
Hey, quick question. How come you can't hear the 10,000 lb Thruster that is 7 feet below them over the radio?
@M34T
I don't know. Do you?
Do you have any experience in acoustics? Materials engineering? How sound travels in a non-atmosphere condition? Have you ever heard that type thruster in actual operation?
Are you actually curious about why you can't hear it or do you suffer from an inability to engage in critical thinking which leads you to suffer from something I call conspiratorial ideation?
I remember this as if it were yesterday. I can't believe it is 50 years ago! Well done USA!
I was 19 when the Eagle landed. Not knowing some of the technical talk at the time, I did not realize what a close call this was. Another few seconds and the landing would have been aborted. However, they were so close that Aldrin and Armstrong weren't backing out as long as there was a chance. It took a lot of technical expertise to pull off this mission, but it also required guys with steel nerves. Sometimes "testosterone poisoning" is just what the doctor ordered.
Such an incredible mission and human feat of intelligence and bravery.
I agree. Its amazing they went 240,000 miles but today's cowardly astronauts can't even go 400 miles.
Never seen a comment section so full of flat earthers...-_-
Much agree - doge
Yea millions of people are crazy right? You are taught what to think now move along.
@@halflife2294 That isn't the way scientific education works, which you would know if you'd had anything resembling one.
Dave A. im listening, truly, id love someone to change my mind, tell me what u discovered
"Flat Earthers"? What does a belief that the Earth is flat possibly have to do with the belief that man went to the Moon on 1960s technology and not nearly enough fuel -- other than the fact they're both ridiculous beliefs, that is?
Seems funny to me that with all our technological advances, no one as ever walked the moon again...Seems fishy to me 🤷🏾♀️
I suppose you vote for representatives that will allocate sufficient funds that would allow us to do it again?
@@shammydammy2610 I suppose you're one of those people that believe everything the government says 🤦🏽♀️
@@shara0133 Everything? No. Do you believe everything that the tinfoil hat brigade says?
@@shammydammy2610 😥
Shara_33 there was more than one Apollo mission ya know. It also costs millions to go to the moon.
Thanks for making this.
And yes Margaret, we went to the moon.
Yea... you and Alice got sent there.... dumb fuck.
And yes, you did not went to the moon. At this point I just love messing with you self-righteous morons.🤣
Moon landing was fake
@Jake L. really bro go n see the video by nasa of moon landing the flag is really flaping on moon🤣🤣
@Jake L. 😂😂😂 You cant tell me reason of flag flapping thts y u quited
I remember that for several hours/a day Houston wasn't sure exactly where they had landed as Armstrong had taken them beyond the planned landing site.
Whoever thinks this is real is a fool and will fall for anything.
Or you know, we believe what is real.
I'm torn. Just don't see how it could have happened back in '69. Apparently the average mobile smartphone has more technology than what was capable back then. Top that off with the Van Allen Belt. The build of the spacecraft etc....I'd like to believe it happened but wouldn't bet my life on it.
Incidences of radiation induced heart disease for astronauts who have been in low Earth orbit: 11%. For the Apollo astronauts it is 46%.
NASA didn't fully understand the nature of the van allen radiation at the time and it goes to show what sacrifices the astronauts made.
You choose whether to believe it or not. It doesn't make a jot of difference.
The people shouting 'hoax' on here are incapable of achieving anything as remarkable in their own lives so they fill the void by flinging shit at the achievements of others.
You can choose to join then if you want but take a good look at the kind of comments these people leave and ask yourself if that is the kind of company that you're comfortable in.
I can kind of sympathise with those who bought it back then as I guess the public weren't so cynical.
Equally I can understand them not 'going back' now as it would come under much greater scrutiny.
They used slide rules and brains. Many engineering marvels have been accomplished without computers. It's slower and more laborious that's all.
@Please permit me to speak oh great one
And I can sympathize with those who suffer from conspiratorial ideation and a limitless skepticism that morphs into cynicism and paranoia. We don't do a good job of teaching critical thinking skills in the US and you are just a glaring example of that inability.
I almost cried hearing this audio. This is beautiful
Man up
mcscootie he didn’t mean sad crying.
you'll be crying when you finally find out it's all bullshit.
Watch the 'return' press conference, that's funnier.
Why has it taken 50 + years to go back?
Because NASA is government operated. Every time that the president changes their goal, it becomes harder for them to progress deeper into space. So, if the presidents had kept the same goal after JFK, maybe we would have already reached Mars. But it isn't that simple, and they need to change how NASA operates, or just have the presidents keep a consistent goal
They havent gone back... and never went to begin with.
Did they really go to the moon 50 years ago daddy. Of course darling. Now get to bed because Santa will be here soon.
@@gucci42069 ... I'm sure you think you sound smart.
it took us that much time to kill all of the Moonlings
I love this movie. The productions amd camera crew were awesome. I want to be like that😍
Clod Rafferty 🤣
Sadly Armstrong and Aldridge never got nominated for an Oscar or Academy award for their stellar performances either......😏
Aldridge?
It takes 2.4 to 2.7 seconds for radio waves to travel from moon to earth and back to the moon, so 2.4 seconds back and forth at best. How comes the base on Earth instantly answers after less than 1 second? Timestamp 13:22 Did they start talking as soon as they heard "Huston, Tra.."?
Because the audio was recorded on Earth. So there would he no time delay when they receive transmissions from the astronauts.
When Houston speaks to the Astronauts you can hear the time delay.
Because the US government assumed that the majority of the US were idiots who didn’t understand science and hence would not notice the rapid communication between two planetary bodies several hundred thousand kilometres apart
Man, they really tried to make it appear real lol.
what do you mean?
😂
I know they had cgi. The tapes arent exactly intact so they had to recreate things
I was 10 years old also. I remember sitting in the living room with my family watching this for hours.
I was ten years old, everybody went inside to watch. As we were mesmerized, my baby brother managed to crawl outside and fell into the pool. As the Eagle landed, my brother took his last breath. A day that will always be remembered.
Damn, that's awful. Really sorry to hear that.
And yet there are some ignorant people in the US who still believe that planet Earth is flat. 😂
Haha, agree, and anti-vaxxers, non-australia believers, and god knows what else people believe.
Three courageous men not knowing if they will return to the beautiful blue planet they filmed in the background!
I wonder how long the little spect of a planet which we call our home will survive without us taking steps to protect it.
Lol! You think they protect it?
Blood, slavery, pedophilia, and lies is what this planet was built on.
But believe in your fantasy, it will definitely help you sleep better. But only for so long.
It's sad that courage to you means putting claim on another planet, instead of bettering the one they already fucked up.
😂Oh well, that's America.
john Fredrik it is the only place we have , if you have issues then VOTE!
Do not resign to pessimism, VOTE for saving the little spect of a planet . I still think it’s evolution is worth saving!
You really believe in the government? They are merely puppet show.
"If you believe, they put a man on the moon" -R.E.M.
They put 12 men on the moon .
13:30 we got some people about to turn blue lmfao
General Chris Gaming it's actually 13:28..........
We came in peace for all mankind.
That chokes me up.
Meanwhile on vietnam the same year
@@slightlyexistential1640 Yes indeed.
yall still believe in santa claus too?🤣🤣🤣
are you asking just to make sure you aren't the only one above the age of 5?
Anyone with a interest in this needs to listen to the BBC podcast 13 minutes to the moon.
Ok..so we are more advanced then ever before in history and we still are not able to go back?give us a break gov.total bull.
Why do you think this is just as easy has standing up??
So you think go to the moon is cheap and USA is free of debt ?
Just wait till 2024 there will be a new moon landing
@@agbag8185 just through television broadcast they can get how much they spent on that. By now I think 4 billion people can watch it. If they again go. Then why they are not
@@hareeshreddy5125 I said just wait until 2024
@@hareeshreddy5125 it's not that easy and it cost billions.
I was in 1st grade and watching the landing live on TV ...will likely be passed away by the time they do this again on Mars..and that’s ok...I will have a spirit world ringside seat and cheering them on, just like I cheered way back then.
Great job, India celebrating this 50 years occasion with chandrayan 2. orbiter lander and rover ....
సర్వ జన సుఖినో భవంతు why does India need to be everywhere
Fake news
Loui Awell the moon landing is real just accept it you fricking dense cabbage
@@doge5014 shut up an go cut your dogs frindge u mupit fake news u clown 🖕
Lmao, dumbass. Your grammar has more errors than a chernobyl bird.
Biggest con trick pulled on the human race.
You're wrong, and not by a small margin. There were 6 manned moon landings. No serious, educated person thinks they were faked.
200 you can see thousands of stars , during astronaut interview they couldn't remember and said no . mmmmmm.
How many stars can you see in the sky during the daytime? The light of our star drowns the ones further way out. That is because it is so much closer to us than any others are.
@@1pcfred
The sun can be observed during daylight as can other stars/planetary bodies depending on the conditions.
Fake
Just wow. So amazing to listen to that 13 minutes of conversation between Eagle and Mission Control, just before the landing. God, the tension is tangible. Like a great sci fi movie, but it happened - 50 years ago. It is awe-inspiring to imagine what it must have been like for Armstrong and Aldrin as they descended in the LM.
Roger, is that you? 🤔
@@zverh ua-cam.com/video/NfDUkR3DOFw/v-deo.html
Do you still have the broadcast before Houston cuts the live feed when they claim to be looking at a mile long black structure and one of Th hem says “We are not alone” ??
Curi0u50ne this isn’t the first time I’ve heard a comment like this. I’ve heard another one that says something like “they’re over there, they can see us”
Do you have any more info on this?
Colin Willems ...Unfortunately not I just turned 50 in May so we were all discussing about ol times and apparently my mum had me in font of the telly to wave at buzz and co. Any how a older relative says he could remember listening to the live broadcast but just as it appeared to get exiting as they were saying that they were observing the feed cut and that was that
2001 A Space Odyssey?
They then went to sleep for 6 hours. How could anyone land on the moon, then go to sleep?
The odds two tired guys could sleep are nothing compared to tens of thousands of morons who don't believe we went.
I have some sympathy for people who bought it back then as they were very different times, overall I think people were less cynical.
Also,where did they use the bathroom? Everyone has to take a morning piss,also be able to eat and whatnot.
I hope I get to follow new Moon missions or even Mars. Gene Krantz book was very interesting, the amount of effort put into these 3 space programs is hard to understand.
At 2k feet, 640 yards.. you can still see the curve of the moon? common..
It's all BS....
All these nutties think they know more than all the greatest minds in the world like elon, niel, jeff, bill, richard. List of great minds that confirmed we went goes on and on.
All these nutties that think we faked it. not a single 1 has a phd i bet you.
You'll be surprised. Sometimes the simplest minds can surprise you.
Don't let a paper make you think that someone is a genius. A lot of rich people get degrees because of status, but were dumb as fuck. A degree won't save a life half the time. But a honest and genuine truthful mind will.
But to each it's own.
@@johnfredrik5345 and most of the times a simple mind is just that. a simple mind unable to comprehend something complex. there were probably people who laughed and doubted the fantastical stories of explorers who sailed back east from north america. sometimes a simple mind is unable to move beyond what they're comfortable with.
@Will the lack of evidence suggesting we faked it would suggest you're the one whom might believe in fairytales.
@@NA-qr3kt Well said - you won 😁
Coms actually crazier than escape from tarkov coms
No time delay???
Much of the audio you are hearing is calls between the Flight Controllers and Flight Director at Houston. There are only a couple of occasions where Houston calls the astronauts requiring a response and in those cases a delay is present. When Houston responds to an astronaut call there is no delay, nor should there be since the audio was recorded at Mission Control.
Good point, i was thinking the same. Today 2020 there is delays in cellphones and live video feeds but 1969 no delays from 100k miles away? really??
I listened this whole series "13 minutes to the moon" , on my way to and from work. Great listen.
I never even realise that the Russians had a craft ,Luna 15 ,that was supposed to land the day after Apollo 11.
I like Hollywood.
Beautiful, now your clip of the moon looks more real than the Apollo 11 video clip WITH ALL THE STARS IN THE BACKGROUND AND FINE TEXTURE AS WELL...And you know what...Nice recording too, even better than some cellular phone recording on earth....Even with such dedication and equipment, I believe that they the astronaut will not even dare put their foot on the moon...for their own Safety No 1. No 2 the Moon is not A ROCK that can be landed...
The guy was awfully calm for someone 200 thousand miles away from earth performing a task that had never been done before with life and death consequences, in fact it sounds like he's reading from a "Script"
That's your evidence that the moon landing is fake, is it? Some completely meaningless opinion of yours that contends that the people speaking in the transmission don't sound exited enough? _Really?_
You simps in the Tinfoil Hat Brigade _never_ fail to provide the comic relief.
@@robashton8606 Why did NASA claim a photo of earth was taken from near moon orbit when in fact it was taken from earth orbit using techniques to make it appear like the photo was taken from a great distance? How could a camera be remote controlled to keep the Lunar lander in frame when it blasted off from the moon's surface when there's a multi minute relay delay?
@@k7gixxer1000 You'll have to provide some sort of source citation for the photography from near Earth orbit stuff. That sounds like conspiracy theorist bollocks.
As for the video camera that recorded the LEM leaving the moon's surface, why would it be controlled from Earth? That would be stupid. The camera could be controlled from the Command Module with no difficulty or, more likely, it was simply an automatic system. Programming a servo to actuate at the required speed to follow an object moving in one direction when the exact speed of the object is known is child's play.
@@robashton8606 @28:10 ua-cam.com/video/rGD1PtGe8Ug/v-deo.html
His words were certainly straight from a scriptwriters pen _"that's one small step for a man....._
Armstrong claims he thought those words up before he exited the craft.
If only this was real...
if only you had more than 1 functioning neuron and could actually accept facts and evidence.
This seems like only yesterday when I saw the Moon Landing...
Oh wait it was. Saw it on UA-cam.
And u watched fake video moon landing never happened
@@aayushkhandelwal4912 oh God you really think its fake don’t you, prove it then
@@kryten1016 how could the lunar module leave the moon with fuel if there is no oxygen?
But in hollywood! There is oxygen!
@@aayushkhandelwal4912 i agree with you sir 👍
In 1972 I was 10 years old and I had the opportunity to meet Buzz Aldrin. We talked for 15-20 minutes. It was the most awesome 20 minutes of my life!
This is so exciting to hear!!!! Man has land the moon and start to conquer the universe!
I really do hope its not the first time you have heard of this? lol
YOU ARE SOME DUMB SUMBITCHES....
Not.
cristybello - There is a vast difference between getting to the moon and conquering the universe. Incomprehensively vast. It won’t happen.
Honey Badger it is not hihihi
....the greatest achievement in human history.......50 years ago.
moon looks cgi
OK im here to educate those who know nothing about cgi. OK firstly cgi was first invented in 1973 and used in the film west world and the graphics were very pixelated hence why in 1969 there was no cgi. Ffs is everybody thick 😬
Some places on Internet had people think they only had a total of 20 seconds of fuel remaining, after which they would have crashed, which is actually incorrect. They had 20 seconds fuel left only for the Descent stage engine but they still had enough fuel for the Ascent stage, enough to get back to the Command Module in orbit. Should they have spent another 20 seconds descending, the mission would have automatically be aborted, the Descend stage would have detached from the Ascent stage, and dropped on the Moon surface, while the Ascent stage would have taken the astronauts back to the Command Module in orbit, much like it did when it took off the Moon surface. spaceflighthistory.blogspot.com/2015/08/failure-was-option-what-if-apollo-lunar.html
Not quite that simple in practice. Ascent engine must work and steer perfectly... as must radar guidance and the onboard computer to actually effect a rendezvous with Collins. Theoretical maneuver never before attempted. Thankfully an abort during LM descent (rather than a carefully orchestrated and precision liftoff from the surface) was never needed during the Apollo lunar landings.
Thank u for your service Astronauts. I was not even born yet
Me too, but i still think drugs are portal to real world.
What service? Literally done nothing for us
The technology advancement
@Sowbelly Canoe oh the moon they made in a studio?
Here's the thing, there is only 1 of 2 things that happened, the first is we landed on the moon and found out that it is an artificially made base and we were warned off not to return which would explain why we havnt been back or two is we just simply never landed on the moon which would be the reason why we've never been back because we never did in the first place
But we went back five times…
When you wait 13 minutes for the touchdown moment that ain't there.
First man in space- Russian, first woman in space- Russian, first earthling in space- sent by @roscosmosofficial , First artificial satellite- Sputnik I (sent by @roscosmosofficial), first successful interplanetary mission- Venera IV (also by @roscosmosofficial ). First person to step on moon- American. WINNER OF SPACE RACE- USA. What the fuck is this??? Did we celebrate 50 years of Venera IV just like we r celebrating 50 year anniversary of stepping on moon?
13 minutes hmmmm ??? and Apollo 11. Oh well none the less we are supposed to believe this ?
Oh and the communications such clarity, what brand of CB antenna did they use ?
Lol! You think that Apollo 11 used citizens band antennae? Wow. Did you also miss the parts where they completely lost contact with the LEM?
You people are seriously dense.
@@robashton8606 So Rob, no point in being insulting. So if not a CB antenna , what then? Please since you are so intelligent please elighten
@@robashton8606 So Rob was it a folded dipole, was it a yagi array , what frequency band were they on. Oh and how many watts ?? Remember we are going 250 k miles. So good buddy please enlighten.
@@robashton8606 So Rob were they transmitting with lots of power, would that pull too much power from the batteries. The batteries that worked the airconditoner, after all they were in direct view of the the sun without attenuation from earth's atmosphere. Come on bright boy. give me some answers
@@robashton8606 Come on Rob, waiting on your answers. How do you get a radio signal 200 thousand miles away.
Who jumped down to the comments to see if a anti-pollo had laid their claim to a comment? Enlightening us with a quote, most likely from RHCP
The great moment.....
And we went thru the Van Allen belt with a tin can.....and the computer on board was the size of a car?
It was a well insulated tin can Markus . Multiple layers of Kapton ( space blanket material ) and a machined aluminium inner capsule . The radiation belts were avoided to a certain extent during the orbiting process . Level of radiation they were exposed to was not deadly . They had the very best minds of the time working the Apollo program , it was very complex , super expensive and highly risky , certainly we'll ahead of its time .
Huh? The computer on board was 24×12.5×6.5 inches.
How can I believe neil really landed on moon . Today we are so far from the technology from 1969 now we can't made somebody to land in moon . How can I believe say ?just an innocent talk .
You don't think straight
NASA doesn’t have the budget
Man think beyong Chandrayaan.....Spaceships have crossed Interstellar space.
Jambhu 1969 moon landing is totally fake..if it's happened after 1990 I would believe it
raghu acharya but bro they got detail that vikram lander have identified apollo 11 landing place in moon.so how bro u say moon landing is fake?
In the space program during the last 50 years nothing revolutionary happened. In fact USA had the best German, and other Eastern-Central European rocket engineers, mathematicians, physicians in the 50's and 60's, and the arm race fueled achievement, These days are over.
🤣 why is there a fake 4 second delay to Neil but not to Charlie??? He's supposed to be orbiting the moon in the command module. Cancelling my TV licence asap.
I get so high. Every. Single. Time I watch this
...
It was a school holiday. I was listening to live radio broadcast. I heard those words through radio cackle “....the Eagle has landed”. Moment of magic now reliving. Overwhelming!
Stanley Kubrik's best movie
I cannot believe that in 1969 they did something we couldn't do today. It's sad
Who told you that lol? We can do that and much more today but we just don’t have proper funding and interest as we did back then. It’s risky to send humans to space which is why it takes time and research to do it again. NASA has plans to go to the moon by 2024 and Mars later on. And just for the record, the machines and instruments used in rockets today are much more powerful and advanced than they were back then. We are also capable of sending rovers, building space stations, and sending spacecrafts to the edge of the solar system like with Voyager 1 and 2. It’s a whole different ball game.
We simply do not have the know how these days, and it would certainly come under much closer scrutiny in today's times than it did back then.