'Devil is in the details': Supreme Court weighing Trump's presidential immunity claim

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 кві 2024
  • The Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday on former President Trump's presidential immunity claim. NBC News' Yamiche Alcindor provides more insight on when the justices could potentially rule on this case and former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner weighs in.
    » Subscribe to MSNBC: / msnbc
    Download our new MSNBC app for the latest breaking news and daily headlines at a glance: www.msnbc.com/information/dow...
    Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
    MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
    ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
    MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
    Connect with MSNBC Online
    Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
    Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc...
    Find MSNBC on Facebook: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Twitter: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Instagram: / msnbc
    #Trump #DonaldTrump #scotus

КОМЕНТАРІ • 739

  • @Monica72215
    @Monica72215 12 днів тому +54

    Alexander Lukashenko was elected as president of Belarus. He is almost a dictator now. Belarus is an example of what will happen in America if Trump has immunity. Expect that the entire government will be corrupted

    • @Daniel4646
      @Daniel4646 12 днів тому +1

      Whta do you mean, "almost". Lukashenko IS a dictator now.

    • @herballycorrect
      @herballycorrect 11 днів тому

      Trump has already been president before and he didn't do any of those things! Show me the man and I'll find the crime! A quote from Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin's reign of terror!

    • @philliplamberth4075
      @philliplamberth4075 День тому

      Communist have taken this over

  • @robertflorentine
    @robertflorentine 12 днів тому +35

    i would hate to be an honest judge and have to be over ruled by a corrupt supreme court

    • @pc4mlc451
      @pc4mlc451 12 днів тому

      But in this case, it's biased activist judges against actual judges of the supreme court

  • @cpk313
    @cpk313 12 днів тому +80

    The Supreme Court of Corruption

    • @stoopidpursun8140
      @stoopidpursun8140 12 днів тому +4

      WAAAGH!

    • @TrumpisAmazing
      @TrumpisAmazing 12 днів тому +11

      😂😂😂😂The challenge that libs have with reality is that it confuses them.😂😂😂😂😂 When life does not match their ideology, 😂😂😂😂😂they begin to blame other people, the system, and of course conservatives.

    • @sherrillthomas7645
      @sherrillthomas7645 12 днів тому +6

      Cry Cry Cry!!!

    • @claudelebel49
      @claudelebel49 12 днів тому +7

      The Supreme Joke of America

    • @chad5529
      @chad5529 12 днів тому +4

      @@TrumpisAmazingyou’re projecting

  • @dannmarceau9743
    @dannmarceau9743 12 днів тому +55

    Never thought I'd see this in my six+ decades of life; I remember a day when the Supreme Court was something to be looked up to, or that was what my impression was.

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 12 днів тому

      Now a bastion of corruption and grift.

    • @bobcob3362
      @bobcob3362 12 днів тому

      Yet no one looks up to random people on you tube either

    • @rosinebartkowski3784
      @rosinebartkowski3784 12 днів тому +4

      Not any more! Hope we get 60 senators to impeach justices who are right wing nuts!

    • @valmikii4013
      @valmikii4013 12 днів тому +1

      Yup. That was then. This, unfortunately, is now... (Sigh). We have so much to thank that Grand Ole Party for, eh?

    • @CS-mv3nw
      @CS-mv3nw 12 днів тому +1

      No one one has seen this issue since 1787!

  • @danajones9298
    @danajones9298 12 днів тому +43

    Hogwash! Criminal acts are criminal acts, “official” or “unofficial”. The best way for anyone not to be prosecuted for criminal acts is not to commit them in the first place.

    • @mike-ms1jm
      @mike-ms1jm 12 днів тому +3

      For someone who's such a criminal they sure can't seem to convict him for anything. Is it possible he's not the criminal they've brain washed you into believing or are they just that incompetent? 😂

    • @mike-ms1jm
      @mike-ms1jm 12 днів тому +2

      They've only been trying for 8 yrs now. What's that tell ya there Einstein?

    • @stoopidpursun8140
      @stoopidpursun8140 12 днів тому

      Obama used a drone strike to assassinate an American citizen. Was that criminal or not? Should be be prosecuted or not? I await your excuses.

    • @joso7228
      @joso7228 12 днів тому +3

      @@mike-ms1jm incompetent maybe but Trump guilty sure

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher 12 днів тому

      @@mike-ms1jm It tells me the justice system is designed to protect rich white guys.

  • @AndyM_323YYY
    @AndyM_323YYY 12 днів тому +70

    Why did it take 45 presidents before one needed immunity?

    • @bobcob3362
      @bobcob3362 12 днів тому +16

      We never had political persecution before

    • @michaelbriganti
      @michaelbriganti 12 днів тому +6

      @@bobcob3362 Bingo!!!

    • @stevestoll3124
      @stevestoll3124 12 днів тому

      It didn't the Constitution has the answer. It's called impeachment and conviction.
      That's is how cases like this are normally delt with.

    • @bezenhappync
      @bezenhappync 12 днів тому +5

      ​@@bobcob3362 lol 🤣

    • @MrGeldhart
      @MrGeldhart 12 днів тому +15

      @@bobcob3362 There is no political persecution. He allegedly committed crimes, and the role of a court case is to determine if the allegation is true. Nixon committed crimes (pardon is an admission of that), and no one batted an eye at enforcing the law.

  • @hereticpariah6_66
    @hereticpariah6_66 12 днів тому +38

    Don't worry.
    He _said_ he'd only be dictator on the first day.
    ...after That, he'll be known as _Beloved Leader._
    *Vote blue.*

    • @2Chua
      @2Chua 12 днів тому

      Which is why the bogus arguments about "future presidents" are just that. After trump is in office, he'll never leave. We'll never have another democratic election so no need to worry about future presidents. He'll hand his empire down to Don Jr.

    • @JesseJones-jh3fl
      @JesseJones-jh3fl 12 днів тому

      Vote blue and you'll get more inflation, another war, and 10 million more illegal immigrants.

    • @MalibuBarbie-kk5gc
      @MalibuBarbie-kk5gc 12 днів тому

      He actually answered a question would he be a dictator, he laughed and said yes I’ll be a dictator but only to immediately stop the flow over the border. Thats it, everything else no I won’t be one.
      but MSM , and their sheep, believe and push the edited narrative. I watched him say it live and it’s still somewhere on the internet.

  • @4014Thugsy
    @4014Thugsy 12 днів тому +97

    This isnt about him being immune from prosecution, its about delaying

    • @vitaminckillscovid103
      @vitaminckillscovid103 12 днів тому +7

      Liberal = 😭

    • @j.dunlop8295
      @j.dunlop8295 12 днів тому +1

      Way to go Joe, "Just the facts," always terrifying to corrupt despots!
      When that fantasy vanity wall he's built his whole life is torn down by courts facts and evidence, he reverts to crying spoiled boy mode!🤔not=🙈🙉🙊. The usual GOP Republicans crying election fraud, while they committed organized election fraud! 😮 It Was them, "MAGA Trumpers!"

    •  12 днів тому +2

      You can Try to prosecute him AFTER his second term.😂

    • @user-ei8do4uq4j
      @user-ei8do4uq4j 12 днів тому

      One of these reporters is wearing an artificial hair piece. Which one do you think it is?

    • @4014Thugsy
      @4014Thugsy 12 днів тому +2

      @vitaminckillscovid103 Congrats on your new 2 year old account, we are totally fooled and don't think you are a troll from another country whatsoever

  • @JoTracy
    @JoTracy 12 днів тому +59

    They shouldn't have eve taken this up. SCOTUS is a disgrace

    • @bobcob3362
      @bobcob3362 12 днів тому +1

      Reeeeeeeeeee

    • @BudFudlacker
      @BudFudlacker 12 днів тому +3

      Joe, Sorry but your feelings are NOT even mentioned in the constitution!!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @gregc.5684
      @gregc.5684 12 днів тому

      @@BudFudlacker Neither is absolute immunity, m0r0n

    • @BudFudlacker
      @BudFudlacker 12 днів тому +1

      @@gregc.5684 That's where the Supreme Court shines ✨️ notice no one contacted YOU to interpret the law boy!!!!!

    • @grahamjones5400
      @grahamjones5400 12 днів тому

      SCOTUS must be abolished, it's a bastion of fascism

  • @kristimead479
    @kristimead479 12 днів тому +103

    The one thing every single American CAN do is VOTE.

    • @mike-ms1jm
      @mike-ms1jm 12 днів тому +21

      For Trump. Seen the polls?🤣

    • @guynorth3277
      @guynorth3277 12 днів тому +7

      VOTE for DEMOCRACY - Do it for the next generation !

    • @knucklestheechidna5718
      @knucklestheechidna5718 12 днів тому +21

      Trump has my vote! 🇺🇲

    • @levanmikadze4748
      @levanmikadze4748 12 днів тому +15

      I think NY is going MAGA , working class majority support Trump over current madness.

    • @kenjames3346
      @kenjames3346 12 днів тому +3

      BLUE!

  • @carolpfeiffer1577
    @carolpfeiffer1577 12 днів тому +15

    NO IMMUNITY............ PERIOD!

    • @brax2364
      @brax2364 12 днів тому

      Sorry. Doesn’t work that way. Do that and EVERY president, past, present, and future will be subject to the same lawfare they’re doing to Trump. Next thing you know we’re officially just like N. Korea. Heading that way now.

  • @donaldstanfield8862
    @donaldstanfield8862 12 днів тому +13

    V💙TE!

  • @oorzuis1419
    @oorzuis1419 12 днів тому +75

    the devil isn't in the detail, it's the subject.

    • @timothylopez8572
      @timothylopez8572 12 днів тому +7

      The greatest trick the devil pulled WASN'T convincing people he didn't exist. It was convincing them he ACTUALLY WAS God. A flabby GOLDEN not orange INFALLIBLE DEITY who personified every deadly sin and loves in a golden tower.

    • @rrmackay
      @rrmackay 12 днів тому

      The devil lives in the white house, he has had satanic rite performed on the white house grounds.

    • @TrumpisAmazing
      @TrumpisAmazing 12 днів тому +7

      Jake Smith 😂😂😂! The challenge that libs have with reality is that it confuses them. 😂😂😂😂When life does not match their ideology,😂😂😂😂😂😂 they begin to blame other people, 😂😂😂😂😂the system, and of course conservatives.❤❤❤❤Trump 2024❤❤❤❤

    • @guynorth3277
      @guynorth3277 12 днів тому

      Exactly ! Good call! Stop playing with this vulgar pile of 'drumpf' - America is exhausted !

    • @davidbradley3735
      @davidbradley3735 12 днів тому +1

      Is the like believing in a real bad tuff guy that never done any of his own bleeding?? Hahaha Hahaha Hahaha Hahaha Hahaha ​@TrumpisAmazing

  • @GmaMom
    @GmaMom 12 днів тому +18

    Corrupt Court!!🤬

  • @user-mp3sc2sk1m
    @user-mp3sc2sk1m 12 днів тому +28

    This is now IS THE SUPREME COURT CORRUPT OR NOT

    • @leslieawest5062
      @leslieawest5062 12 днів тому +1

      Totally Corrupt, Trump Packed Court!! Plus Justice Clarence Thomas, and Wife Ginny Thomas, who is a huge Trump Election Denier and she was a Big part of Trump Jan 6 2021, Fake Electors Scheme,etc!! Definately Conflict of Interest, and Justice ⚖ Thomas doesn't Recuse himself from any 🤡 Trump Cases!! 😮Sucks Doesn't it! 😡😡😡😡

  • @user-dj8mg3et2g
    @user-dj8mg3et2g 12 днів тому +6

    Reading between the lines, Barrett gets that immunity would eliminate the balance of powers, and her job would be worthless in the face of Trump. She's not as stupid as Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanagh, and Thomas.

    • @rosinebartkowski3784
      @rosinebartkowski3784 12 днів тому

      You notice it is the female justices who all are thinking we the people, not what Trump needs to be protected or stall the court trial to benefit trump...

  • @davidduarte4840
    @davidduarte4840 12 днів тому +21

    The devil isn't in the details, he is in the crosshairs of justice.

    • @mike-ms1jm
      @mike-ms1jm 12 днів тому +3

      Yeah for like 8 yrs now😂. Either they are completely incompetent, or you've been lied to. I'll let you decide.

    • @jeffhess7130
      @jeffhess7130 12 днів тому +1

      joe & hunter biden should be the one's in the "CROSSHAIRS OF JUSTICE" 🇺🇸⚖️🇺🇸

    • @liberalshaveitallbackwards4667
      @liberalshaveitallbackwards4667 12 днів тому

      Ok groomer

  • @williamrose2506
    @williamrose2506 12 днів тому +8

    Glenn is my first choice for delineating the current issue.

  • @livelife4471
    @livelife4471 12 днів тому +12

    You are concerned about the stakes in this case. What about the stakes in the next election? I can't believe the USA is run like this. I would have expected better.

    • @2Chua
      @2Chua 12 днів тому

      We have too. Such is our miscalculation.

  • @wendellcoleman1137
    @wendellcoleman1137 12 днів тому +8

    In regards to the potential "hearing" that Judge Chutkin could hold concerning the Official vs Private (campaign) activities. Andrew Weissmann made an interesting point on the Lawrence O'Donnell program last night, that a hearing wouldn't be just any old hearing that normally lasts a day or two. This hearing could actually last several weeks (just like a trial) with a number of witnesses testifying and most of the same evidence that would have been entered into evidence at a regular trial, would be submitted as evidence in this "hearing".
    Weissmann implied that this hearing would essentially be a "bench trial" with Chutkin making the final verdict (No Immunity/Guilty!), as opposed to a jury trial (that would be subject to a hung jury). This would still allow the American voters to see the same evidence/testimony that would have been presented at a formal trial, and allow the voters to become a "Jury of 1", where they could arrive at their own "verdict" . . . and vote accordingly. Another big benefit of a hearing over a formal trial, according to Weissmann, is that the hearing could be held much sooner than the trial, as the defense wouldn't be given all that extra time (81 days . . . almost three months) to prepare for a "hearing".
    His take was very interesting and will probably be talked about more, should the SCOTUS remand the case back to Chutkin to decide the Official activities vs Campaign activities question.

  • @ClaudiaTipping-cd8vc
    @ClaudiaTipping-cd8vc 12 днів тому +41

    It's all crap playing the Trump card. The Supreme Court should not have taken the case.

    • @mike-ms1jm
      @mike-ms1jm 12 днів тому +5

      Cuz your the legal and constitutional scholar 😂. Should they sit around all day obsessing about Trump like you instead?

    • @TheBigRed.
      @TheBigRed. 12 днів тому

      OMG get brainwashed often do you???
      They just keep pushing the TDS syndrome propaganda...🤡🌎🥴🥴🥴

    • @albertmolina1781
      @albertmolina1781 12 днів тому +3

      Still america

    • @13bustah
      @13bustah 12 днів тому +4

      AWWW poor thing don't like Justice.

    • @davidbradley3735
      @davidbradley3735 12 днів тому

      @@mike-ms1jm The Timothy McVeigh wannabes will be so sad when their exalted orange leader goes to jail??

  • @allyfire7915
    @allyfire7915 12 днів тому +4

    Let's vote like we never voted before and send this message to the SC An Judge's like Cannon we don't need you traitors vote Blue. Blue. Blue.

  • @user-xe3ul5pn2b
    @user-xe3ul5pn2b 12 днів тому +5

    These people dont understand that what they are doing sooner or later is going too back fire with this politic madness !

  • @SueFerreira75
    @SueFerreira75 12 днів тому +3

    Once the trust in the Supreme Court is broken and it is with very good reason, the future of the country is in deep, deep trouble.

  • @BenMartinBox
    @BenMartinBox 12 днів тому +15

    I am a European and I am very sorry to see America drowning in this way every day. Your only hope for saving your democracy is next November. Also, I suggest you think carefully about depoliticizing the presidential nomination of the SCOUTS. Instead of making presidential appointments, make it an automatic career progression, based on the merit and impartiality proven by the candidates' judicial career and life. Judges linked to or affiliated to political parties should be automatically disqualified from appointment. Good luck next November.

    • @CodyCoonrod
      @CodyCoonrod 12 днів тому +1

      I wish people had that much power. Even if a candidate has the majority vote they still can lose.

    • @scabcrawler632
      @scabcrawler632 12 днів тому

      Bot

    • @Balletified
      @Balletified 12 днів тому +2

      @@scabcrawler632
      Bot? This is how most Europeans that live in democracies feel……
      That’s also how our supreme courts are compiled: by merit and peer review.

    • @BenMartinBox
      @BenMartinBox 12 днів тому

      @@CodyCoonrod I understand. That issue of the popular vote not being enough to elect a president, are based on political schemes (mostly promoted by the Republicans) to gain power in situations where the "people" have not given them any power.

    • @BenMartinBox
      @BenMartinBox 12 днів тому +1

      @@scabcrawler632 You are a Bot? Thanks for letting us know.

  • @ShariCrocker
    @ShariCrocker 12 днів тому +8

    I know now just where and when these devils crossed my path in Georgia, and Tennessee.

  • @winstonsmith6607
    @winstonsmith6607 12 днів тому +7

    The walls they be a closin' in! He'll be in jail tomorrow for sure.

    • @christinaslattery8658
      @christinaslattery8658 12 днів тому +1

      Biden should be in jail and his son

    • @TrumpisAmazing
      @TrumpisAmazing 12 днів тому +3

      😂😂😂😂The challenge that libs have with reality is that it confuses them.😂😂😂😂😂 When life does not match their ideology,😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 they begin to blame other people,😂😂😂😂😂😂 the system, and of course conservatives.❤❤❤❤MAGA 2024❤❤❤❤

    • @knucklestheechidna5718
      @knucklestheechidna5718 12 днів тому +6

      Don't hold your breath he's about to be the next president!
      Ohhhh yes

    • @levanmikadze4748
      @levanmikadze4748 12 днів тому

      Lol .

    • @joso7228
      @joso7228 12 днів тому

      @@knucklestheechidna5718 put your kneepads on to grovel

  • @joso7228
    @joso7228 12 днів тому +10

    So the Question is? - American Constitution or Banana Republic

  • @webwhisper2701
    @webwhisper2701 12 днів тому +1

    The devil is on trial.

  • @powerdriller4124
    @powerdriller4124 12 днів тому +2

    The Supreme Courrupt.

  • @joerogain5025
    @joerogain5025 12 днів тому +23

    ''I'm not running for President so much as I'am running 🏃from the Law.''
    Donald tRUMP

    • @r32guy10
      @r32guy10 12 днів тому +3

      How did ‘bona fide liberal’ Muskie come to make a joke that almost instantly gained the status of conservative received wisdom?

    • @DarthSailorMoo
      @DarthSailorMoo 12 днів тому +1

      @@r32guy10 Please convert that from Russia to English.

  • @joenolan9602
    @joenolan9602 12 днів тому +1

    Scotus needs to be a national election. No more appointments.
    Also any public office holder can not profit other than their salary. Period.

  • @william5159
    @william5159 12 днів тому +1

    That the question of "absolute immunity" is even a question, even a topic for consideration is absolutely insane. Utter nonsense. That anyone can make that argument or that the Supreme Court is giving the question time and validity ought to be enough for them all to hide in shame and embarrassment.

  • @fredinwhiterock
    @fredinwhiterock 12 днів тому +2

    I think that America would be best served by allowing the trial to go forward now and if he is convicted then Trump can appeal and the legal system has all of the time in the world to solve their puzzles.

  • @timwhite7127
    @timwhite7127 12 днів тому +2

    Of course they took it up. They gotta run interference for their orange buddy.

  • @jlocey87
    @jlocey87 12 днів тому +1

    Birds of a feather CONSPIRE together.....

  • @garygoodrich7495
    @garygoodrich7495 12 днів тому +1

    Do they really need to have a discussion on what's legal and what's not? What's right and what's wrong??

  • @jesnoggle13
    @jesnoggle13 12 днів тому +1

    You know they gonna kick the can… basically a win for Trump.

  • @felipevazquez3872
    @felipevazquez3872 12 днів тому +1

    How a retrograde mind can corrupt a brilliant minds 😮😢

  • @TSPhilosophyGameplay
    @TSPhilosophyGameplay 12 днів тому +1

    Details don"t matter to these types who are easily corrupted, and we all suffer because they weaken accountability to traditional thinking

  • @JamesDibona
    @JamesDibona 12 днів тому +2

    YOU KNOW WHAT - REMOVING CORRUPT SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IS AN OFFICIAL ACT - COVERED BY IMMUNITY - SO I SAY LET THEM RULE A PRESIDENT HAS IMMUNITY AND THEN BIDEN CAN REMOVE ANY JUDGE WHO IS CORRUPT... I MEAN AS LONG THEY CANT FIGURE IT OUT LETS HELP THEM FIGURE IT OUT

  • @jlocey87
    @jlocey87 12 днів тому

    Who is higher than the Supreme Court ????
    The next level of judicial authority resides with the Courts of Appeal.

  • @markrawson1435
    @markrawson1435 12 днів тому +19

    Could we all agree that someone that has so many crimes and court dates should not be allowed
    to run for president, let him run in 2028.

    • @MalibuBarbie-kk5gc
      @MalibuBarbie-kk5gc 12 днів тому

      No. Remember DA with political bent can , and do, change anyone. Also as the saying goes, a grand jury will charge a ham sandwich. So the judicial,process has to go along, the same as it does for all Americans.

    • @frankmoore7292
      @frankmoore7292 12 днів тому +2

      Bogus charges

    • @myles5158
      @myles5158 12 днів тому

      @@frankmoore729289 bogus charges. Sure frank 😂

    • @myles5158
      @myles5158 12 днів тому +4

      @@frankmoore7292read the actual indictments instead of faux news 😂😂😂

    • @MalibuBarbie-kk5gc
      @MalibuBarbie-kk5gc 12 днів тому +1

      @@myles5158 writing up an indictment is easy abd means nothing.

  • @dharriusthun
    @dharriusthun 12 днів тому +1

    Supreme Court is pathetic.

  • @davidwilliams8392
    @davidwilliams8392 12 днів тому +3

    We will vote for America an, women freedom not putin trump America going back to the 1940s

  • @charlesritter6640
    @charlesritter6640 12 днів тому

    Can't even believe they are talking about this.
    Either NO ONE is ABOVE THE LAW or? ??

  • @user-bx9dj3bc5j
    @user-bx9dj3bc5j 12 днів тому +1

    What new loophole is going to be created by these supreme A*""$..?

  • @gentleman8122
    @gentleman8122 12 днів тому

    Well done MSNBC well done.🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @hank6429
    @hank6429 12 днів тому +3

    This hole debate is stupid it like saying I work at bank so I have the right to take the money 💰 😂

  • @beewa8840
    @beewa8840 11 днів тому

    Private public - what's the difference? Crimes committed in private are still crimes.

  • @pancakeface5717
    @pancakeface5717 12 днів тому +1

    John Roberts has led the Court into pure partisanship, and Mitch McConnell delivered a majority to help him. Hopefully history will reflect badly on Chief Prejudiced Roberts.

  • @BluePlanet470
    @BluePlanet470 12 днів тому +2

    How is a president supposed to do his job if there's always the threat of someone deciding he should be prosecuted for a critical decision he had to make? A president has to have some degree of immunity. This has never been an issue till now and has opened up a whole new can of worms.

    • @nonya.bizness
      @nonya.bizness 12 днів тому

      potus has 24/7/365 access to the greatest legal minds in the country. there is never a reason to accidentally or innocently or ignorantly commit crimes. and if a potus follows legal counsel and ends up violating the law, they have nothing to worry about.
      "someone" doesn't decide to prosecute people for crimes. only prosecutors can do that. and it's done on the basis of evidence. that's what our entire country stands on.
      if you don't believe in our systems of law and government, you don't really deserve an opinion on it.

    • @dieterhoch8273
      @dieterhoch8273 8 днів тому

      You obviously weren’t around for Nixon’s “critical decisions”. Crime is crime, nimrod.

  • @joehernandez5194
    @joehernandez5194 12 днів тому +1

    Can someone tell me what is the supreme courts job?
    What do they do?

    • @erock736
      @erock736 12 днів тому

      Whatever Trump tells them to do apparently.

  • @larryj1685
    @larryj1685 12 днів тому +1

    There needs to be rules whereby the Supreme Court has some type of oversight and audits on their findings. Additionally, there should be a max time these folks can serve! A lot of what we have now is folks more committed to candidates and not the law!
    Don't trust most of them at this point!
    Clarence Thomas should have he removed long ago! Especially after refusing to recuse himself from the hearing re Jan 6 attach on this country and there were some concerns as to the extent of his wife involvement!

  • @pauldockree9915
    @pauldockree9915 12 днів тому +1

    What is with Dean John Sauer's vocal chords? Distinctive.

  • @tystratton-quirk9859
    @tystratton-quirk9859 12 днів тому +6

    Presidential immunity applies to actions performed in the role of President. This hearing is to determine whether Trump's actions in trying to overturn the election were as President or as a Presidential candidate. As numerous people have said, he's not saying he's innocent; he's claiming that he should be allowed to commit crimes without the possibility of punishment.

    • @Balletified
      @Balletified 12 днів тому

      Exactly.

    • @nonya.bizness
      @nonya.bizness 12 днів тому

      there has never been, and is not as of now, such a thing as presidential CRIMINAL immunity of any kind. and no immunity from being sued for personal (including campaigning) acts. there is an immunity ONLY from being sued for official acts.
      this whole thing here, as to whether his criming was done as potus or as a candidate is new territory, and utterly outside of any laws or the constitution. if scotus grants criminal immunity of any kind, they are making it up out of thin air.

  • @chadbaker48
    @chadbaker48 12 днів тому

    It’s a pathetic example of something so obvious. Why don’t they just start sitting around chatting about installing a royal family too 😂

  • @patriciazoerner
    @patriciazoerner 12 днів тому

    We're waiting to see if the Supreme Court is going to let the Devil stay free. 😮

  • @user-us4sq1pt4v
    @user-us4sq1pt4v 12 днів тому

    Basically all at a stalemate

  • @archieclement2977
    @archieclement2977 12 днів тому

    The Piper is tuning up. It's come time to pay for bringing these politically motivated cases, and for making a mockery of the judicial system.

  • @ItTrolls4Thee.
    @ItTrolls4Thee. 12 днів тому +1

    "Four more years, pause" - Joe Biden 🤣🤣🤣

    • @erock736
      @erock736 12 днів тому

      There’s no way you’re laughing that hard at that comment. The humor was not of that magnitude no matter where you stand politically. Just saying.

  • @Abovetherest1969
    @Abovetherest1969 12 днів тому +3

    I do not want a second Trump presidency the last one cost too many lives and divided the nation.

  • @MaryReese-oy8is
    @MaryReese-oy8is 12 днів тому

    Mess with immunity and any ruling majority could set the rules at what they want.

  • @user-rp8hz1lz7s
    @user-rp8hz1lz7s 11 днів тому

    How come they can take women right but not one right from him

  • @waynethompson1115
    @waynethompson1115 12 днів тому

    Hearing the arguments, I think the SC is going to rule for Trump.

  • @Daniel4646
    @Daniel4646 12 днів тому

    Arjen Rudd: "Diplomatic immunity!"
    Roger Murtaugh: "It's just been revoked!"
    ~ Lethal Weapon 2

  • @johnnylafayette
    @johnnylafayette 12 днів тому

    Think do to Thomas wife being involved after this he needs a thorough investigation by the feds

  • @stevemarvin2785
    @stevemarvin2785 12 днів тому +1

    Biden should send seal team to visit the court and Don tonight.

  • @bobbyrubio6114
    @bobbyrubio6114 12 днів тому

    Washington DC ❤❤❤❤❤

  • @robertlong7466
    @robertlong7466 12 днів тому

    Odd that a far more advanced society as we are labeled, can't deceiver a document written nearly two hundred and fifty years ago.

  • @davidcertain2492
    @davidcertain2492 12 днів тому

    The SC has immunity, why not their gaseous buddy?

  • @joehernandez5194
    @joehernandez5194 12 днів тому

    Do they like do something with the law?

  • @TatayK
    @TatayK 11 днів тому

    Anything for their Golden God. Excuse me while I vomit 🤢

  • @markbishop1138
    @markbishop1138 12 днів тому +1

    If the Supreme court try to turn things around the government must stand on the LAWS. No one is above the LAWS. If it was mint to be above the LAWS, we wouldn't need the constitution at all. The president of the United states is a part of the three branches of the government .that is why they must work together.

  • @waynehenson1094
    @waynehenson1094 12 днів тому

    Delay delay delay

  • @robertcarey3383
    @robertcarey3383 12 днів тому +1

    Trump dragged the presidency into the cesspool and the supreme court has decided to join him. This is disgusting on every level.

  • @d.b.2812
    @d.b.2812 12 днів тому +3

    They will stall and stall until its too late

    • @bobevans9955
      @bobevans9955 12 днів тому

      Stop crying

    • @erock736
      @erock736 12 днів тому

      This is America baby, nothing gets done in a timely manner.

    • @webwhisper2701
      @webwhisper2701 12 днів тому

      Trumpster’s legal team know that stall tactics is their best shot to get this to go away… and to avoid allowing the public to hear details.

  • @Elli1122
    @Elli1122 12 днів тому +1

    It’s actually very simple. If the supreme court grants absolute immunity for a president, that means Joe Biden also has immunity. Some of those scenarios proposed as worst-case scenarios… Become options.

  • @raeannmassey7598
    @raeannmassey7598 10 днів тому

    The fact that scotus is even entertaining the thought to debate this is absolutely ridiculous, and a sign of just how polluted scotus truly is! Vote BLUE 🗳 💙 🇺🇸 🌊

  • @muratmede2678
    @muratmede2678 12 днів тому

    I heard that America is the role model for others countries

    • @johnmc128
      @johnmc128 12 днів тому

      You heard wrong, which country want so much division hatred bigotry, racism and stupidity.

  • @robertbowman5892
    @robertbowman5892 12 днів тому +5

    Scotus is a Supreme Joke 🤣

    • @bobevans9955
      @bobevans9955 12 днів тому

      Only because things don't go your way that is a typical Democrat

    • @robertbowman5892
      @robertbowman5892 12 днів тому

      @@bobevans9955 no because it's a joke not my way or yours .
      Immunity is a joke

  • @williegallo6987
    @williegallo6987 12 днів тому +1

    Cry me a river😢 bet if court was going your way all cry babies would be praising the court 😂😂😂😂

  • @claudelebel49
    @claudelebel49 12 днів тому

    The third option is the only one that makes sense.

  • @tacotiernan
    @tacotiernan 12 днів тому

    How are they continuing the Bush Money trial when this judgemental is holding out? Would it be reversed if they find him total immunity?

  • @mr.e432
    @mr.e432 12 днів тому +3

    One of the prosecution's arguments is "trust that the DA would act in good faith and not abuse the legislation"
    😂😂😂

    • @dazeyday5699
      @dazeyday5699 12 днів тому

      What was stopping all these supposed corrupt DAs in the past 250-ish years of presidential terms? I'm sure the whole system that's proceeding in a slow and orderly fashion to attempt prosecute criminal Donald is a lot more fair and measured than the demonstrably corrupt SCOTUS.

  • @takakeshikone6743
    @takakeshikone6743 12 днів тому +2

    Please tell me this is not the USA 🇺🇸 😢

  • @elloowu6293
    @elloowu6293 12 днів тому

    What does he need immunity for I wonder 😂

  • @williamwever4489
    @williamwever4489 12 днів тому +3

    Does the Supreme play the game OBFUSCATION>

  • @keithmcgarrigle8921
    @keithmcgarrigle8921 12 днів тому

    Lock the rest up like Michael Cowen. Then Trump will show he is above the law?

  • @howlinwind
    @howlinwind 12 днів тому

    I can't listen to Trump's lawyer talk without thinking of Scooby-Do. When Trump is found guilty, I want to hear the lawyer give out a big "Ruh-roh".

  • @amypiersma
    @amypiersma 12 днів тому +1

    When the case goes back to Chutkin, can she do hearings on all the evidence and put the evidence out before the election, whether or not it’s presented to a jury?

  • @pauldockree9915
    @pauldockree9915 12 днів тому

    Justice Neil Gorsuch cheek.
    A Rule for the ages allegedly.
    We have a saying in Great Britain.
    2005-2024 so far
    It whatever you are NOT doing is taking ages.
    Justice Thomas is a couple of years my senior. Yeah.

  • @awtodor
    @awtodor 12 днів тому

    $COTU$

  • @thomfult7956
    @thomfult7956 12 днів тому

    That Trump Bible with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights should have also included the Penal Code!

  • @GothTransCarl
    @GothTransCarl 12 днів тому

    From the Hudson River to the LA Valley Trump will be Free 🕊️

  • @BrattyBetty
    @BrattyBetty 12 днів тому

    Roberts knows that presidential immunity is settled law -- The Nixon Rule: United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), is considered a crucial precedent limiting the power of any U.S. president to claim executive privilege. In the case of United States v. Nixon, the Supreme Court ruled that executive privilege did exist, but pertained to matters of national security. Executive privilege does not apply to criminal matters. --------------- Meanwhile classified documents that Donald Trump stole when he left the White House are just in the wind ??

    • @JesseJones-jh3fl
      @JesseJones-jh3fl 12 днів тому

      Those documents will turn up after Trump wins the election. They're going to figure promently in several high profile prosecutions. It's illegal to manufacture a fraudulent Russian dossier so you'll have a pretext for spying on the President of the United States.

  • @stevestoll3124
    @stevestoll3124 12 днів тому

    Does anyone know what the question is about immunity and the President?

    • @elloowu6293
      @elloowu6293 12 днів тому

      Don't attack your own country in any way, is probably where the buck stops. Anything else is probably a grey area.

    • @willgetbettereventually124
      @willgetbettereventually124 12 днів тому

      Trump thinks he should have immunity from every crime he committed while in office. First one that needs it other than Nixon.

  • @Muttinchopsforeverandalways
    @Muttinchopsforeverandalways 12 днів тому +1

    Trump is toast

  • @allyfire7915
    @allyfire7915 12 днів тому

    Even the Supreme court is in Donthecon pocketputin Donjr we get lots of money from Putin

  • @portiawilcox3120
    @portiawilcox3120 12 днів тому

    Supreme Court schooling the desperate Dems!!💯😂👏🎉