I LOVE this format! And about skipping the fourth part… I think if the first three sections are written right, the why law school can be discerned and doesn’t need to be stated.
Man, this advice is throwing me for a loop. I took an LSAT prep class, I've watched a bunch of videos and read a bunch of advice, and the overwhelming consensus I've gotten has been to use the statement to answer 3 questions: Who are you, why law school, and why (insert the school you're implying) in particular? Hell, I've had admissions officers from law schools give this advice. Now I hear this, and the major through-line seems to be not to even touch 2/3 of that. As if this shit wasn't confusing enough already. XD
I LOVE this format! And about skipping the fourth part… I think if the first three sections are written right, the why law school can be discerned and doesn’t need to be stated.
Man, this advice is throwing me for a loop. I took an LSAT prep class, I've watched a bunch of videos and read a bunch of advice, and the overwhelming consensus I've gotten has been to use the statement to answer 3 questions: Who are you, why law school, and why (insert the school you're implying) in particular? Hell, I've had admissions officers from law schools give this advice.
Now I hear this, and the major through-line seems to be not to even touch 2/3 of that. As if this shit wasn't confusing enough already. XD
YOU ARE FROM DC!! HTTC! Also, thank you for all of the content you guys provide.
fuck yea