I grew up in Waco, had classmates that were former branch davidians--the entire city of Waco thought that they were all crazy because that was the narrative the media played. I plan on watching all these hearings to reeducated myself
Washington DC politician sham hearings isnt the best source of accurate info to depict anything about Mount Carmel. Try Waco: Rules of Engagement. That’s my recommendation to you! It’s eye opening for sure. Very much so.
Sure - actual footage and such. But if that primary footage involves the government investigating itself to proclaim it acted 100% correctly, that doesn’t count as trustworthy or truthful or a good source of info. I would never ever seek to learn about anything controversial involving federal law enforcement agencies having acted in potential malice and disregard for their own rules of engagement / criteria for canceling a planned raid, etc, by viewing the federal government judging whether its own law enforcement agency did wrong or not. For all time, the government will justify its evils. Always has and always will in the immediate aftermath especially. And especially when charges might be pressed against those agencies’ members who are employed by the same government of which congress is comprised. Disgustingly obvious.
@@heatherbellamy596You’re exactly right! It drives me crazy that these people sat and watched the FLIR video that showed 100% the FBI shooting into the compound on the day of the fire but not a single congressman or senator asked about that they sat there and let the POS FBI agents lie repeatedly!!
Type in on UA-cam: "A Waco Survivor Describes What Really Happened (1999)". There were many other options for path of least resistance, yet they chose the path of most resistance to feather their caps. If government had such immediate concern for the children and others lead by Koresh, then why didn't the ATF and FBI go for an easy interception and arrest Koresh in town or while on his daily jog, as survivor David Thibodeau suggested? Keep asking why government went this route??? Government simply wanted the church disbanded because they were bearing arms, and needed to INVENT and INCITE a skirmish to create an oppositional situation to rationalize their attack = REAL agenda! Then the government propagandized the event as distorted and irrevocable blaming the Davidians. Bottom line: the government does not want us to bear arms.
No coincidence either that 3 of them had done personal security detail for newly inaugurated president Bill Clinton. “We as Americans seek out the truth…” this guy has got to be kidding.
Stuart Wright, I wouldn’t be surprised if I was the only commenter here that can truthfully say I have purchased and read your book. And I gotta say… as payback for reading it I’m kinda glad to see no one asked you a question lol. Not even a repub
The point of this one was after the Oklahoma city bombing and the guy that did that said that he was upset about what happened at Ruby Ridge and Waco. Both of those innocent women and kids/ children got killed by federal agents and nothing happened to anyone in the feds. The left was trying to make their people look good. I find it strange that Chuck S and others who are still in office stood up for police and agents back in 93' and 94', but today they hate them and want them gone. If you notice Chuck says he wants no bias and wants facts then he gives his own narrative on what happened but he wants a fair impartial investigation. Then takes this hearing and starts to attack the NRA. No matter how one feels about them, these reps from the democratic party continue to derail the hearing so they can attack the NRA. Again I'm shocked that back then Chuck S stands up for law enforcement, but today he sings a completely different toon.
Exonerate murderers through an investigation carried out by their own employers - wtf - this would not be allowed anywhere outside the realm of government. Disgusting. Also about victim blaming and continuing to lie about people who were shot by agents as they attempted to flee a building that was on fire. Or run over by tanks.
Great question… what is the point of any congressional hearing? To get at the truth? Or maybe to generate sound bytes for campaign videos and throw partisan attacks back and forth.
@@rafachafa1086 I was just trying to answer your question. The point of this hearing was supposedly to give the american people a comprehensive factual account of what happened at waco in 1993. That is the point of it. But I think at many times throughout the ten day hearings that point is not made.
I know someone who said he walked out of his first Religious Studies Class in School.... saying "Religion is for Social misfits and outcasts". What were these pple from all around the world looking for in Kuresh and The Branch Davidians ?
To Mr Reavis “Revis” - McMahon = McMann. Just bc you have concocted some bizarre pronunciation of your own last name, doesn’t mean other traditional names pronounced a well-established way, cease to follow that trend/tradition solely bc you’re an exception to the rule/norm, whether you be a self-named person or it was some ancestor who decided to be different, probably to stand out, to act superior to the mere Reavises of the world. Am I serious? No. But McMahon=McMann, as it always has and always will.
just like with randy weaver once you take down one of theirs it won't end pretty totally agree with the comments that this was avoidable just like ruby ridge not saying randy or david were saints saying there were other non violent ways to get them in those roads in both cases were obviously not taken let's not forget these terrible ways our own government resolved these situations
Politicians just live the sound of their own voice and to find the truth then sir you need to read out the names of the david Ian men women cna children's names to otherwise everything that follows is bias
It was not suicide. They were murdered!!!!!
Murdered? Absolutely! Same with Ruby Ridge. Our government is getting worse all the time. May God help us before it is too late.
I grew up in Waco, had classmates that were former branch davidians--the entire city of Waco thought that they were all crazy because that was the narrative the media played. I plan on watching all these hearings to reeducated myself
Primary sources dude-good for you
Washington DC politician sham hearings isnt the best source of accurate info to depict anything about Mount Carmel. Try Waco: Rules of Engagement. That’s my recommendation to you! It’s eye opening for sure. Very much so.
Sure - actual footage and such. But if that primary footage involves the government investigating itself to proclaim it acted 100% correctly, that doesn’t count as trustworthy or truthful or a good source of info. I would never ever seek to learn about anything controversial involving federal law enforcement agencies having acted in potential malice and disregard for their own rules of engagement / criteria for canceling a planned raid, etc, by viewing the federal government judging whether its own law enforcement agency did wrong or not. For all time, the government will justify its evils. Always has and always will in the immediate aftermath especially. And especially when charges might be pressed against those agencies’ members who are employed by the same government of which congress is comprised. Disgustingly obvious.
@@heatherbellamy596You’re exactly right! It drives me crazy that these people sat and watched the FLIR video that showed 100% the FBI shooting into the compound on the day of the fire but not a single congressman or senator asked about that they sat there and let the POS FBI agents lie repeatedly!!
Type in on UA-cam: "A Waco Survivor Describes What Really Happened (1999)". There were many other options for path of least resistance, yet they chose the path of most resistance to feather their caps. If government had such immediate concern for the children and others lead by Koresh, then why didn't the ATF and FBI go for an easy interception and arrest Koresh in town or while on his daily jog, as survivor David Thibodeau suggested? Keep asking why government went this route??? Government simply wanted the church disbanded because they were bearing arms, and needed to INVENT and INCITE a skirmish to create an oppositional situation to rationalize their attack = REAL agenda! Then the government propagandized the event as distorted and irrevocable blaming the Davidians. Bottom line: the government does not want us to bear arms.
I wanted to watch this and could not find it until now thanks for the upload your the man
they play evidence and start the witness hearing on 1:41:15
Thank you, as after 30 minutes of lip service, my hinny was feeling a little chapped and uncomfortable.
Neat script, Chucky. Got a source on literally any of those claims and statements?
The bias of these people is ridiculous!!
You can hear Chuck Schumer repeating these same canned talking points 28 years later vis-a-vis the Capitol "Insurrection."
I don't think this Charles guy knows what facts are or what unbiased means after that opening statement
You’re 100% accurate.
This was a joke! The FBI and ATF SHOULD BE DISSOLVED!
Holy shit I have never seen such stalling in my lifetime.
From Waco to Breonna. They still have not learned to do their investigation properly.
All cops are idiots.
Did congress investigate breonna Taylor?
These guys remind me of little kids fighting over watching a film or not watching a film just get on with it little kids
these 4 men were shot in the back by 'friendly fire'
No coincidence either that 3 of them had done personal security detail for newly inaugurated president Bill Clinton. “We as Americans seek out the truth…” this guy has got to be kidding.
Mr. Reavis.
*BOOM* goes the kick ass dynamite.
Ruby Ridge?
Oklahoma City?
i like how he gives instructions to not be biased then proceeds to give an extremely biased speech against the davidians.
first time watching the heatings but i kmew about this situation disgusting lies
How many opening statements are there going to be? @14:55 is it really appropriate to have a little laugh and a giggle?
Ambush???
Had there been, there’d have been 75 names read at the start, not 4. Ludicrous.
1:38:23 Great story
Stuart Wright, I wouldn’t be surprised if I was the only commenter here that can truthfully say I have purchased and read your book.
And I gotta say… as payback for reading it I’m kinda glad to see no one asked you a question lol. Not even a repub
The atf fucked around and found out on February 28th.
I have a motion... get the fuck on with it! Damn!
What’s the point of this?
The point of this one was after the Oklahoma city bombing and the guy that did that said that he was upset about what happened at Ruby Ridge and Waco. Both of those innocent women and kids/ children got killed by federal agents and nothing happened to anyone in the feds. The left was trying to make their people look good. I find it strange that Chuck S and others who are still in office stood up for police and agents back in 93' and 94', but today they hate them and want them gone. If you notice Chuck says he wants no bias and wants facts then he gives his own narrative on what happened but he wants a fair impartial investigation. Then takes this hearing and starts to attack the NRA. No matter how one feels about them, these reps from the democratic party continue to derail the hearing so they can attack the NRA. Again I'm shocked that back then Chuck S stands up for law enforcement, but today he sings a completely different toon.
Exonerate murderers through an investigation carried out by their own employers - wtf - this would not be allowed anywhere outside the realm of government. Disgusting. Also about victim blaming and continuing to lie about people who were shot by agents as they attempted to flee a building that was on fire. Or run over by tanks.
Great question… what is the point of any congressional hearing? To get at the truth? Or maybe to generate sound bytes for campaign videos and throw partisan attacks back and forth.
@@patrick4662 huh?????
@@rafachafa1086 I was just trying to answer your question. The point of this hearing was supposedly to give the american people a comprehensive factual account of what happened at waco in 1993.
That is the point of it. But I think at many times throughout the ten day hearings that point is not made.
Watt's such an infant.
Bookmark 1:46:32
I know someone who said he walked out of his first Religious Studies Class in School.... saying "Religion is for Social misfits and outcasts". What were these pple from all around the world looking for in Kuresh and The Branch Davidians ?
LOLOLOL NRA.Way back then.I missed this, I left tx after the massacre and moved to Belize til the Clintons were out of office.
The thumbnail is the bad guy from saw.
Byron Sage was pure evil incarnate.
To Mr Reavis “Revis” -
McMahon = McMann.
Just bc you have concocted some bizarre pronunciation of your own last name, doesn’t mean other traditional names pronounced a well-established way, cease to follow that trend/tradition solely bc you’re an exception to the rule/norm, whether you be a self-named person or it was some ancestor who decided to be different, probably to stand out, to act superior to the mere Reavises of the world.
Am I serious? No. But McMahon=McMann, as it always has and always will.
To hell with the federal agents who died. They are all evil.
I hate that I feel this way but I agree with you.
just like with randy weaver once you take down one of theirs it won't end pretty totally agree with the comments that this was avoidable just like ruby ridge not saying randy or david were saints saying there were other non violent ways to get them in those roads in both cases were obviously not taken let's not forget these terrible ways our own government resolved these situations
Politicians just live the sound of their own voice and to find the truth then sir you need to read out the names of the david Ian men women cna children's names to otherwise everything that follows is bias