INSTALLING a 2.3L Trinity TVS Supercharger on my 2009 Shelby GT500 | Easiest 100WHP+ Mod you can do!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @Twobarpsi
    @Twobarpsi 2 роки тому +2

    Great installation and video!!

  • @nestor5.422
    @nestor5.422 3 роки тому +1

    Is that boy carrying a gun?! Lmao! My man! Nice walk through man. Thanks

  • @snoop.69
    @snoop.69 3 місяці тому

    Hello, Great installation and video. Coming to ask if you have exact bolt size for supercharger to intercooler bolt. that 10 bolts. Thanks in advance.

  • @otbvenge2108
    @otbvenge2108 7 місяців тому

    What pumps are you running w this set up I have dw 340s on but don’t know if I’ll need the baps im going with the same tvs set up

    • @OctaneSlain
      @OctaneSlain  7 місяців тому

      Factory pumps. Your pumps should be good, but I'd still run BAPs just as redundancy. Having a constant and steady supply of voltage to your fuel pumps is never a bad thing.

  • @josedelarosa6449
    @josedelarosa6449 Рік тому

    I know this is late, bit I'm doing the swap. The hose that connects to the fuel rail from one side to the other, did you replace it or use the old one? Thanks

    • @OctaneSlain
      @OctaneSlain  Рік тому +1

      I never removed it. I kept it intact and just flopped it over when removing and setting the new blower. If you have seperated the rubber hose from the fuel rail, I would replace it. If not, just reuse it.

  • @sokodad
    @sokodad 3 роки тому +1

    How much of a power increase does the change make? I apologize if you said it and I missed it. I thought of boosting my SRT but too many have told me boosting a 392 Hemi is just asking for trouble later. They suggested getting RT and boost 5.7 or buy a Hellcat. Before I did that I’d buy a GT500.

    • @OctaneSlain
      @OctaneSlain  3 роки тому +1

      I gained about an additional 100whp with room to grow a lot more down the road. I've seen Trinity swap setups make over 800whp all day. My setup is actually very mild (stock trinity pulley, still have catalytic converters, factory exhaust manifolds, stock trinity injectors, etc) and we're figuring the car to sit around ~650whp. I can easily pulley down, go catless, larger crank pulley, and larger injectors and make way more power, but I love the way it drives now. Plenty of power and extremely reliable. And I wouldn't boost a 392, either. The control rings on the 392 pistons are way too close to the top of the piston, and the ringlands are ridiculously thin for boost pressures. A Hellcat or GT500 would definitely be my next choice. Matter of fact, I share my driveway with my cousin-in-law's Scat Pack Challenger. He's in the same exact boat as you. He's too skeptical boosting his 392 (especially after he had a cam and lifter failure with his engine after only 17k miles!) and is wanting to get a Hellcat Charger now for reliability and easier power/mod/price gains in the future with that platform

    • @MustangGrabberOrange
      @MustangGrabberOrange Рік тому

      @@OctaneSlain Mein GT500 2009 hat den originalen Kompressor, es wurde eine kleinere Riemenscheibe, Ford Racing Drosselklappe und Luftfilter verbaut.
      Krümmer und KAT ist Original.
      Nach der Abstimmung hatte mein GT500 610Ps und 880Nm
      Original hatte er 510Ps auf dem Prüfstand.

    • @MrRuegi
      @MrRuegi Рік тому

      2008 Gt 500 with TVS and Justin software, 669,7 HP 880 Nm. Pulley a little smaller

  • @Dawson521
    @Dawson521 3 роки тому +1

    My head hurts 🤕

    • @OctaneSlain
      @OctaneSlain  3 роки тому +2

      It wanted to make sure you never forgot the experience

  • @deeremeyer1749
    @deeremeyer1749 3 роки тому

    .030" plug gap on a "high performance" supposedly modern and high-tech DIS engine. Hilarious.

    • @OctaneSlain
      @OctaneSlain  3 роки тому +4

      Copper plugs in an iron block engine. Please, explain what's so high tech about this engine? It doesn't even have any form of variable valve action. This is about as barebones of a DOHC engine you can come across. Really don't understand what kind of point you're trying to get across here, but it isn't working.