Umm “no precedent for giving a commoner husband a title on their marriage to a princess??” Please check your history and see what happened when Princess Margaret married a commoner- oh that’s right, they made him an earl
When this video feature says "there is No Precedent...", it simply means that granting Royal Titles to commoner husbands of women royals has no "legal tradition" being followed, that no royal decrees patent had allowed it in recent history. What happened to Anthony Armstrong Jones was Exceptional owing to the fact that he married a granddaughter, daughter and sister of 3 successive monarchs, making her proximity to the throne veritably credible, and therefore would be unfair for their future children to be sort of ostracized if left with no titles just because their dad was a commoner. That's why Elizabeth II made the EXCEPTION by offering the couple a Noble (NOT Royal) Title, Earl & Countess Snowdon. In fact, Tony Snowdon NEVER had HRH before his official name, which further solidifies the point that indeed there Is NO precedent in that category. (Their children however are still addressed with Lord and Lady to this day.)
Earl is not a ROYAL title I believe. I believe it was from the beginning a title for someone working for a King/Queen. In Scandinavia/old nors language Jarl. They was probably chosen from Nobel families. In Scandinavia it does not exist any more. I'm not sure it uses in UK thou Prince Edward is also a Earl? Maybe in Scotland and It's means like before work in order of/instead of The King. But Edward is still a Prince. Princess Margaret's husband was not.
@@HotVoodooWitch AI narrations don't make this kind of mistake, unless of course the word that was fed to the AI bot was actually sincere instead of serene.
@ I have an extremely discerning ear (in fact, I was the audio control for a neural network project); believe me when I tell you that this narration is NOT being spoken by a human being.
Funfac: Alexandra Miller's older sister, Pavlos' wife. Her sister's father-in-law was the last king of Greece. Her sister's mother-in-law was the youngest sister of the queen of Denmark, and her father-in-law was the younger brother of Queen Sophia.
Mr. O'Neil is a class act. I remember when Princess Madeleine was set to marry her longtime boyfriend Jonas & he was going to receive the male equivalent of her title. I was all for it. Then it came out he cheated, though it was strongly hinted at when the wedding was "delayed" then cancelled because she was initially marrying a few months after her sister, Victoria. Any other man would insist on a title, but Mr. O'Neil showed he only wanted Madeleine & to be happy. And she's more than happy to do her charity work & move to support his career. I saw an interview they did & they are the most loveable, down to earth couple.
The title Jonas had been Hertig/Duke av/of Hälsingland och Gästrikland, Madeleines dukedom. She hade keep that plus still be Princess of Sweden. I think it's sad that Chris rejected the title, because I think he could do great as a Duke. Special in Hälsingland and Gästrikland. There's kids are princesses and Prince + plus duchesses and Duke of there own landskap (regions but not exactly). I think thats more strange, because now they have been born and have lived outside Sweden. It had been more respect to give up his common life for her's. 😊
for the "von Fürstenberg" example: by german law you are entitled to keep the name forever if you insist; unless Alexandra gave it up she is still Alexandra Prinzessin von Fürstenberg
They really are zu Furstenberg as the family still owns the estate of Furstenberg. Her former husband's father Prince Egon stated that Americans think all German aristocrats have a "von" so he just went with it.
hate the AI accent anyway but i dont enjoy an accent from a country with no monarchy on this subject if one has a basic understanding how monarchy works it is not rocket science, if the mother is the royal, and the father is untitled you are just Mr or Miss Joe Blogs
I agree that you shouldn't have focused on the royal in-laws. Of course, they're not going to have titles. Also, where are Peter and Zara Phillips? Also, a commoner husband was given a title in Britain. Antony Armstrong-Jones became the Earl of Snowden when he married Princess Margaret, the late Queen Elizabeth's sister. Please fact-check your information.
Illustrious Grimaldi dynasty? Are you kidding? The man had at least 2 children out of wedlock and hid this from this present wife. That is sleazy, not "illustrious". And Ranier was not faithful either.
not a good video: as there are a lot of siblings you are repeating the same stuff over and over again. some names were not correct. sorry. did not like it.
Your video is 👎 please stick to the children of the siblings of a reigning king, not to persons who married a Royal. Normally if a man without a title marries a princess their children do not automatically get a royal title. Only if a current King or Queen wants to give a title. Like Queen Elizabeth II who wanted to give the children of Princess Anne a title but she refused. In the Netherlands for example only the wife of the King, Queen Máxima has a title: Queen Consort. The wives of all other princes have a title by courtesy of the King. The are adressed as Your Royal Highness or Your Highness because they are married to a Prince. If a Princess marries a commoner he can never use the HRH title.
So did Princess Anne. Queen Margrethe of Denmark stripped the princely titles of the children of her second son and just made them non-royal Counts and Countess of Monpezat (all have the same title).
@@HHshahMAsh I stand corrected. The hoopla around them losing the titles prince and princess made it sound like they were being relegated to aristocratic titles only.
@@LJB103 It seems that you do not know what the title of prince means in general. A prince is only for a person who is either the crown prince, the son of the ruler, or the deputy ruler. This is the prince. Also, a count is a person of high nobility and prestige.
So you focused on the in-laws but forgot about the children of Princess Anne?
Umm “no precedent for giving a commoner husband a title on their marriage to a princess??” Please check your history and see what happened when Princess Margaret married a commoner- oh that’s right, they made him an earl
their son is now 2nd Earl of Snowdon; the title was even hereditary
When this video feature says "there is No Precedent...", it simply means that granting Royal Titles to commoner husbands of women royals has no "legal tradition" being followed, that no royal decrees patent had allowed it in recent history.
What happened to Anthony Armstrong Jones was Exceptional owing to the fact that he married a granddaughter, daughter and sister of 3 successive monarchs, making her proximity to the throne veritably credible, and therefore would be unfair for their future children to be sort of ostracized if left with no titles just because their dad was a commoner.
That's why Elizabeth II made the EXCEPTION by offering the couple a Noble (NOT Royal) Title, Earl & Countess Snowdon. In fact, Tony Snowdon NEVER had HRH before his official name, which further solidifies the point that indeed there Is NO precedent in that category. (Their children however are still addressed with Lord and Lady to this day.)
Wrong photo of George V. It shows his son.George VI
Earl is not a ROYAL title I believe. I believe it was from the beginning a title for someone working for a King/Queen. In Scandinavia/old nors language Jarl. They was probably chosen from Nobel families. In Scandinavia it does not exist any more. I'm not sure it uses in UK thou Prince Edward is also a Earl? Maybe in Scotland and It's means like before work in order of/instead of The King. But Edward is still a Prince. Princess Margaret's husband was not.
@@rivenoak Yes but it is not a Royal title
DUDE.. it’s not Your SINCERE Highness it’s Your SERENE Highness…(ya did a VOCAL blooper on your Monaco “rap.”
American. Oh my lord. Mispronounced Names Titles. 😢😂😂
My assumption, on hearing this plus another Edwardian instead of Ecuadorian descent, was that it was an AI error.
@@tobyrose4854 uhh . . . . irritating AI narration has no nationality.
@@HotVoodooWitch AI narrations don't make this kind of mistake, unless of course the word that was fed to the AI bot was actually sincere instead of serene.
@ I have an extremely discerning ear (in fact, I was the audio control for a neural network project); believe me when I tell you that this narration is NOT being spoken by a human being.
Princess Eugenie not Eugene.
Funfac: Alexandra Miller's older sister, Pavlos' wife. Her sister's father-in-law was the last king of Greece. Her sister's mother-in-law was the youngest sister of the queen of Denmark, and her father-in-law was the younger brother of Queen Sophia.
Mr. O'Neil is a class act. I remember when Princess Madeleine was set to marry her longtime boyfriend Jonas & he was going to receive the male equivalent of her title. I was all for it. Then it came out he cheated, though it was strongly hinted at when the wedding was "delayed" then cancelled because she was initially marrying a few months after her sister, Victoria.
Any other man would insist on a title, but Mr. O'Neil showed he only wanted Madeleine & to be happy. And she's more than happy to do her charity work & move to support his career. I saw an interview they did & they are the most loveable, down to earth couple.
The title Jonas had been Hertig/Duke av/of Hälsingland och Gästrikland, Madeleines dukedom. She hade keep that plus still be Princess of Sweden.
I think it's sad that Chris rejected the title, because I think he could do great as a Duke. Special in Hälsingland and Gästrikland. There's kids are princesses and Prince + plus duchesses and Duke of there own landskap (regions but not exactly). I think thats more strange, because now they have been born and have lived outside Sweden. It had been more respect to give up his common life for her's. 😊
True
A man who appears strong and intelligent, with power, money, and influence He looks like a prime minister
Why do you show a picture of King George the sixth, it should be King George the fifth. Make sure of your correct information before printing.
I can't believe you didn't include Zara Tindal or her father.
what about zara Phillips and her brother, grandchildren of th Queen
The picture was of George VI not George V as you mentioned.
Your forgetting prince Edward’s kids and princess Margaret’s kids
for the "von Fürstenberg" example: by german law you are entitled to keep the name forever if you insist; unless Alexandra gave it up she is still Alexandra Prinzessin von Fürstenberg
They really are zu Furstenberg as the family still owns the estate of Furstenberg. Her former husband's father Prince Egon stated that Americans think all German aristocrats have a "von" so he just went with it.
You left out Princess Ann’s children and varous members of the Dutch Royal family
hate the AI accent anyway but i dont enjoy an accent from a country with no monarchy on this subject if one has a basic understanding how monarchy works it is not rocket science, if the mother is the royal, and the father is untitled you are just Mr or Miss Joe Blogs
His "sincere" highness
The picture shown as ‘King George V’ is actually showing ‘King George VI’.
There were a lot of mispronounced names.
I agree that you shouldn't have focused on the royal in-laws. Of course, they're not going to have titles. Also, where are Peter and Zara Phillips? Also, a commoner husband was given a title in Britain. Antony Armstrong-Jones became the Earl of Snowden when he married Princess Margaret, the late Queen Elizabeth's sister. Please fact-check your information.
Illustrious Grimaldi dynasty? Are you kidding? The man had at least 2 children out of wedlock and hid this from this present wife. That is sleazy, not "illustrious". And Ranier was not faithful either.
Why not cover all siblings in a block instead of repeating over and over the same information?
You talk too fast.
not a good video: as there are a lot of siblings you are repeating the same stuff over and over again. some names were not correct. sorry. did not like it.
Koenig is no respected historian of any kind. Why waste time mentioning her?
Cashiraghi it’s not Royal.
Geeze! Are bad AI or you just didn't take the time to look up the correct pronunciations!?
Your video is 👎 please stick to the children of the siblings of a reigning king, not to persons who married a Royal. Normally if a man without a title marries a princess their children do not automatically get a royal title. Only if a current King or Queen wants to give a title. Like Queen Elizabeth II who wanted to give the children of Princess Anne a title but she refused. In the Netherlands for example only the wife of the King, Queen Máxima has a title: Queen Consort. The wives of all other princes have a title by courtesy of the King. The are adressed as Your Royal Highness or Your Highness because they are married to a Prince. If a Princess marries a commoner he can never use the HRH title.
Queen Consort is not a title, but a description. A Queen is HM the Queen, whether Regnant or Consort.
This guy is an idiot -- Monagaskiu? Give me a break
You need to learn how to pronounce these names.
this video is basiclly a pile of repetitions
Yeah, this is all wrong.
Why did Martha Louise strip her children of royal titles? They look like street children I'm sad for them😢
So did Princess Anne. Queen Margrethe of Denmark stripped the princely titles of the children of her second son and just made them non-royal Counts and Countess of Monpezat (all have the same title).
@ No, it is not true Their titles were replaced by the title of Count and Countess of Monpezat While retaining the right to succeed the throne.
@@HHshahMAsh I stand corrected. The hoopla around them losing the titles prince and princess made it sound like they were being relegated to aristocratic titles only.
@@LJB103 It seems that you do not know what the title of prince means in general. A prince is only for a person who is either the crown prince, the son of the ruler, or the deputy ruler. This is the prince. Also, a count is a person of high nobility and prestige.
@@HHshahMAsh Then explain Prince Michael of Kent or Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. Neither of their fathers or mothers were the monarch.
Horrible pronunciation and full of mistakes.