ua-cam.com/video/d0DeYn3KyfM/v-deo.html If you're interested in learning more about DOP Emmanuel Lubezki I made this video a while back breaking down his cinematography. Hope you enjoy the video!
I really want to see the development of both Lanthimos and Aronofsky. They’re up there in my favourite directors list and their styles are really unique and at times, groundbreaking.
director Terrence malick another key lubezki collaborator that added up to his style ,started working with smaller budgets as he progressed throughout his career, i think that this should be the sequel for this episode!
Same, ive seen hundreds of movies movies and i keep trying to experience the feeling i had watching children of men and lost in translation. Almost unbeatable
@@nickmoradi711 lost in translation. Another treasure. Good choice. My dinner with Andre, Repo man ( 1984) and after hours ( 1985) also some of the gems I can watch time and again and still get fascinated. May be Paris Texas too but not for all occasions.
I will never forget the first time I saw Children of Men. It was very late at night, I just wanted to stop watching TV, then this movie started unexpectatly. And it completely captivated me since the very beginning. The story was incredibly thrilling, but I was also extremely tired. I wanted to stay awake to now what happens next. But finally I fell asleep. And when I woke up I was so disappointed for missing the ending. I went on to buy the DVD as soon as I could and I didn't regret it. One of my all time favorite movies for sure.
Honestly, your videos helped me appreciate the smaller details in movies more, and with it my overall experience of watching films, so thank you for that, hope you keep going.
I love this series! The fact that in the end, the budget doesn't make a filmmakers vision. And i loved that you covered the Cuaron and Lubezki team, they make me proud of being Latin American. An episode on Aronofsky would be excellent!
Am I the only one that cried on the 'Seize Fire' scene in Children of Men. When they were walking down the hall and everyone was admiring the baby and all the chaos just stopped.. I was high yes but omg I balled my eyes out
Cuaron did right leaving Harry Potter after the 3rd movie. Usually when you see a small budget director going from small budget to big budget, he usually wants to stay in the big budget territory, sometimes making sequels or similar movies. Cuaron avoided that, and instead used his experience on big budget movies to explore other genres and try different things. I love a director that explores different genres. Is usually what leads to a lasting career.
You are propably right. But I still think that HP3 was by far the greatest movie in the Harry Potter universe. Espacially compared to the first two movies, it was so much more detailed and beautiful and - yes I have to say it - magical.
@@fruitproof115 and the fact that the following directors decided to do their own thing instead of replicating it also helped Plus, I don't think Cuaron would be able to do that again
Wait, this guy had Children of Man AND Prisoner of Azkaban in his filmography?! Thank you for this video, Cine, I had no idea they were made by the same guy!!
unsure if this is wanted info, but in spanish the little ' that goes ontop of some letters describes where the stress of the word is, so its not MAma, its maMA
The content is very good and following you from first video, Can you make a video of you making shots in real time , Using - angle techniques , lightning , type of shots.
hi, I know the Safdie brother's style has already been analyzed by many but I would love to see your take on it, I really love the way you dissect cinematography. If you do have time, could you make a video about them?
Your videos are amazing, I truly enjoy them and learn form them. But there is something I was wondering. Where did you find the budget info of Y tu mamá también? Because I'm from Mexico and films with that big of a budget are fairly rare, even for the biggest, most commercial films from 2020. Production costs in México are vastly different form the ones in the US
what shutter angle you think lubezki uses for this handheld stuff? children of men seems like it might have a faster than 180, but i think im just crazy
Big fan of your channel!!!!!!! Is it possible if you can make a video on Sam Esmail and his way of shooting? Specifically Mr. Robot!!! Thank you again!!!
On a 100 million dollars budget, the most absurd depense is this one : Bullock was paid $20 million up front for "Gravity," which is an impressive number on its own. But her deal also included 15% of box office revenue, which got her at least $70 million. Poor vfx team... They presumably don't have the talent to compete with someone who can imitate a dog's barking
Cuaron originally wanted salma hayek to play the role, who would have almost certainly been cheaper than Sandra, but the studio wanted a big (white) star
People want Cuaron back for The Wizarding World. But honestly, that is not the solution. They need to hire a different director for the series. To bring something new. I like franchises that have different directors for each movie.
The "one shot" is way overrated in my opinion. Yes, it is hard to pull off. It to me this always feels like a tech demo rather then thinking about what is really best for the film. Also I despise the the shaky cam. To me this has nothing to do with cinema.
These different budget breakdowns really make you think about the art of visual storytelling and the craft of it. Because you can't help but think about the budgets that can be put together with whether a movie just doesn't work. And the reason's why they sometimes just don't work. I've heard good things about Children of Men, haven't seen it nor Y Tu Mama Tambien. But I did see Gravity and that just was not a good film. The look of it was great with seeing Earth rendered like it was. But all that budget and time put in and it still wasn't good. Wasn't a good story and the all the glaring misconceptions they had about being in zero gravity, which you don't know if they forgot to consider or needed to have to keep the story going.
ua-cam.com/video/d0DeYn3KyfM/v-deo.html If you're interested in learning more about DOP Emmanuel Lubezki I made this video a while back breaking down his cinematography. Hope you enjoy the video!
Thanks, very good video also. I would like to know more about the diferences beteween Arri ultra prime and master prime lenses.
this new section is sooooooo good. we need others: yorgos lanthimos, terrence malick, denis villenueve and darren aronofsky
yes, yes, yes, and yes.
I really want to see the development of both Lanthimos and Aronofsky. They’re up there in my favourite directors list and their styles are really unique and at times, groundbreaking.
@@marleymeow1701 exactly
Alfonso and Emanuel is a match we need, but don't deserve. Thank god these two met eachother
director Terrence malick another key lubezki collaborator that added up to his style ,started working with smaller budgets as he progressed throughout his career, i think that this should be the sequel for this episode!
The amount of work & conceptualizing that went into that car scene in the woods ....
Children of men gave me Goosebumps when I first saw it. It still remains one of my all time favourite and one of the most important movies ever made.
Same, ive seen hundreds of movies movies and i keep trying to experience the feeling i had watching children of men and lost in translation. Almost unbeatable
@@nickmoradi711 lost in translation. Another treasure. Good choice. My dinner with Andre, Repo man ( 1984) and after hours ( 1985) also some of the gems I can watch time and again and still get fascinated. May be Paris Texas too but not for all occasions.
Children of men is visual master piece, but the end is meh in my opinion at leat ...
CHILDREN OF MEN is a rare breed of cinematic masterpiece. 🔥
Alfonso Cuaron directed my favorite _Harry Potter_ movie. His visual style essentially gave birth to the franchise's style moving forward.
I think of Children of Men as an underrated gem. Never see anyone talking about it, and it's nearly perfect.
Love Alfonso Cuaron style, especially in his low budget films, handheld, natural lighting, few cuts, that's the way I love it, very "low key".
I will never forget the first time I saw Children of Men. It was very late at night, I just wanted to stop watching TV, then this movie started unexpectatly. And it completely captivated me since the very beginning. The story was incredibly thrilling, but I was also extremely tired. I wanted to stay awake to now what happens next. But finally I fell asleep. And when I woke up I was so disappointed for missing the ending. I went on to buy the DVD as soon as I could and I didn't regret it. One of my all time favorite movies for sure.
Amo tu canal, amo lo que haces. Muchas gracias! Te saludo desde México
Segundo eso.
Honestly, your videos helped me appreciate the smaller details in movies more, and with it my overall experience of watching films, so thank you for that, hope you keep going.
I love this series! The fact that in the end, the budget doesn't make a filmmakers vision. And i loved that you covered the Cuaron and Lubezki team, they make me proud of being Latin American. An episode on Aronofsky would be excellent!
Thank you so much, watching your videos help me take my mind off a lot of the stuff going on in life right now
Am I the only one that cried on the 'Seize Fire' scene in Children of Men. When they were walking down the hall and everyone was admiring the baby and all the chaos just stopped.. I was high yes but omg I balled my eyes out
Cuaron did right leaving Harry Potter after the 3rd movie.
Usually when you see a small budget director going from small budget to big budget, he usually wants to stay in the big budget territory, sometimes making sequels or similar movies.
Cuaron avoided that, and instead used his experience on big budget movies to explore other genres and try different things.
I love a director that explores different genres. Is usually what leads to a lasting career.
You are propably right. But I still think that HP3 was by far the greatest movie in the Harry Potter universe. Espacially compared to the first two movies, it was so much more detailed and beautiful and - yes I have to say it - magical.
@@fruitproof115 and the fact that the following directors decided to do their own thing instead of replicating it also helped
Plus, I don't think Cuaron would be able to do that again
I still kinda wish he would had directed the rest of the franchise >.< I'd loved to see his take on them later entries.
@@JRTIntervencion we would eventually get tired
Just like we are tired of David Yates
@@LeonardoKlotz You provide a very fair point my friend. Still would had loved to see his take on them, but your point is very very fair. Thank you!
Love your voice. The speed of the visuals. And clarity. Nice job.
Thank you for this video. I truly love the duos work & I am so inspired by their movies.
Thanks. That was a really helpful dive into the career of this incredible director & his DP.
such a great vid, i hope your channel never changes lol
Wait, this guy had Children of Man AND Prisoner of Azkaban in his filmography?! Thank you for this video, Cine, I had no idea they were made by the same guy!!
Such a good breakdown of one my favourite directors 👏🏼 appreciate his work on a whole new level
Man, your videos are incredible! I'm just starting out & literally pumping hours into your videos to learn. Kisses x
Thank You so Much! you didn't speak about Rome, but it's all there! cheers from Portugal
The tech insights of this episode are priceless
2:08 I see what you did there 😏
Awesome essays as always
Wonderful essay. Great. I appreciate the research, the intellect, and time placed into this essay. Keep up the great work
It’s so in depth. Amazing.
When I was watching Harry Potter movies when I was younger, even then you could really sense Cuaron’s (the 3rd ones)style
DUDE! Love the series keep it up!
You are amazing!!!!
Thank you for explaining why I love the movies I love.
Awesome, one of greatest videos I ever seen.
Congrats.
very nice breakdown
Just How soothing your voice is blows my mind
unsure if this is wanted info, but in spanish the little ' that goes ontop of some letters describes where the stress of the word is, so its not MAma, its maMA
Thank you very much. Nicely done. Hope to see more of this.
The content is very good and following you from first video,
Can you make a video of you making shots in real time ,
Using - angle techniques , lightning , type of shots.
Cuarón is like.. where does he get his ideas? I have been to his home in Roma since I live in CDMX. Truly the man just has had white a life
I love your videos so much.
Each time I get a notification I get excited!
amazing work thanks !
Would you please do a video on the UK's utopia, its style is so incredible
hi, I know the Safdie brother's style has already been analyzed by many but I would love to see your take on it, I really love the way you dissect cinematography. If you do have time, could you make a video about them?
This
Great video
5:37 Long takes/wide lens....basically the opposite of most amateur movies today
Well done, as always man!
Some about Alejandro González Iñárritu's movies please!!!!
Beautiful.
the disrespect on prisoner of azkaban
Wow ! I am amazed !
Your videos are amazing, I truly enjoy them and learn form them. But there is something I was wondering. Where did you find the budget info of Y tu mamá también? Because I'm from Mexico and films with that big of a budget are fairly rare, even for the biggest, most commercial films from 2020. Production costs in México are vastly different form the ones in the US
What type of camera lenses did Cuaron used for Y Tu Mama: a wide or a telephoto to give it a documentary feel for the frame?
Thank you
When mentioning lens choices, can you include crop factor as well in a separate text?
They're most probably shot on Super35 so that's close to APS-C or around 1.5 in crop factor :)))
Can you do Ridley Scott Next?
When is Kubrick one coming?....
Please do one on Wes Anderson
what shutter angle you think lubezki uses for this handheld stuff? children of men seems like it might have a faster than 180, but i think im just crazy
Спасибо за cool контент!
A+
Could you please do Dante Spinotti (ex: Heat)?
Finally First comment, Like your essays. Thanks !
I loved itu mama tambein
please do darren aronofsky!
Big fan of your channel!!!!!!! Is it possible if you can make a video on Sam Esmail and his way of shooting? Specifically Mr. Robot!!! Thank you again!!!
I wanna hear more discusssion on how cuaron made prisoner of Azkaban a masterpiece in a movie for kids
17 million in 1995 was not same as in 2020. It was quite big money for the film
please do one or martin scorsese or denis villenueve
Hi! could you make a video of Lucrecia Martel? she has some amazing movies like "La Ciénaga" and "La Niña Santa", thanks!!
And there's Prisoner of Azkaban
Didn't know that this director made Gravity. Thanks for the fun fact. And thanks for the video!
With regard to the Children of Men "oner", here's an interesting look into the hidden cuts by Corridor: ua-cam.com/video/B4cSv3wE61M/v-deo.html
Children of men is one of my top 3 films.
Adjusted for inflation, 76 and 100 are almost identical.
❤️
Plz make more videos on Christopher Nolan.......
On a 100 million dollars budget, the most absurd depense is this one : Bullock was paid $20 million up front for "Gravity," which is an impressive number on its own. But her deal also included 15% of box office revenue, which got her at least $70 million.
Poor vfx team... They presumably don't have the talent to compete with someone who can imitate a dog's barking
Cuaron originally wanted salma hayek to play the role, who would have almost certainly been cheaper than Sandra, but the studio wanted a big (white) star
@@Ariel_emerald Oh man I would have loved that. I enjoyed Gravity in theaters, but I don't think Bullock was good casting.
Why no harry potter? I know chivo didnt shoot it but still... it’s a cuaron picture with all of his visual flourishes.
👍🏻
I really dislike the use of the word "documentary-like" as an adjective. As if "documentary" is one thing - handheld camera work. It's so reductive.
Did you know that Cuaron produced THE WITCHES (2020), alongside Guillermo Del Toro and Robert Zemeckis?
WTF happened?
@B P But the movie also had Del Toro and Zemeckis as screenwriters
Do marvel
People want Cuaron back for The Wizarding World. But honestly, that is not the solution.
They need to hire a different director for the series. To bring something new.
I like franchises that have different directors for each movie.
But they stuck with David Yates though
The "one shot" is way overrated in my opinion. Yes, it is hard to pull off. It to me this always feels like a tech demo rather then thinking about what is really best for the film. Also I despise the the shaky cam. To me this has nothing to do with cinema.
Amazing tutorial! Thank you so much! I have filmmaking related tutorials as well. Any support would mean alot! Thanks again
Am I the only one who thinks gravity is overrated? It doesn't even have a Consistent plot.
Almost first
These different budget breakdowns really make you think about the art of visual storytelling and the craft of it. Because you can't help but think about the budgets that can be put together with whether a movie just doesn't work. And the reason's why they sometimes just don't work.
I've heard good things about Children of Men, haven't seen it nor Y Tu Mama Tambien. But I did see Gravity and that just was not a good film. The look of it was great with seeing Earth rendered like it was. But all that budget and time put in and it still wasn't good. Wasn't a good story and the all the glaring misconceptions they had about being in zero gravity, which you don't know if they forgot to consider or needed to have to keep the story going.