I finally understand now why Ashley killed her husband and all her other actions. She was NEVER going to let him move in with her and her daughter. It is not nearly as clear in the current trial.
I agree. 💯 and not because she was afraid of him, she just didn’t want him anymore. So sick. The histrionic personality disorder makes SO much sense. I had to look into what that was. Cray cray!!!
Wowza. I’m watching her trial now and get curious between court sessions…. The evidence doesn’t match up. She’s still claiming he punched the dog when in fact it would seem he did not! Psycho girl…. Sheesh
Watching after trial. I did not find her credible at all and didn’t think her story made sense, but I found it concerning how many people vehemently supported her. I considered those who believed her might’ve had information I didn’t, so I decided to watch this hearing to see if my BS radar is malfunctioning. I now believe without any doubt AB is where she needs to be: locked in a cage, and those who believe her are simply unable to read human behavior or have personal experiences that skew their view.
She was using him ,,, she wanted money and she clearly said she wanted a baby ,,,so once she found out he was broke she was done with him ,,,he was crazy over her ,,, ya he was angry at times but i dont think he ever hit her , she knew he was not going away with the custody so she planned on murdering him , Im so glad she f*ked up and got caught,,,i hope justice is served,,,murder is murder and its wrong!!!
Wow.. Now that was a bombshell.. He was killed only 3 days before a huge custody hearing.. He would have most likely won his case because the judge had already sided with him previously. Doug seems like he knew enough to do things the right way, and legally in regard to his child. He also seems like he tried extremely hard to please Ashley and keep her happy. I find it very hard to believe that Doug actually laid a finger on Ashley.
Actually it wasn't a custody hearing, but a court hearing where the joint motion of both psychological evaluations would be revealed. Doug wouldn't move to Maryland or stop his divorce proceedings until the results of the both psychological evaluations were released. Doug was cleared on his, and Ashley wasn't. She knew Doug would most likely divorce her and gain full custody of Emerson after it would be revealed she's unfit to parent. Side note: Doug was given full say in regards to Emerson's health decisions, not Ashley. Ashley needed to gain full custody in order to receive child support for her and her mother to pay their rent and bills.
As a right provided for us in our constitution here in America we shouldn't be so quick to object to his demeanor in court. Miranda rights give us the right to representation if and when accused of a crime. I would hope to shout if there ever came a time to invoke my Miranda rights that my attorney would vigorously defend me against my accusers no matter how foolish he may appear. Just saying
@@leannehartley7928 I believe you have missed the point entirely, but to respond to your kind reply, the constitution in fact does allow me to dismiss his demeanor at any time. It is called freedom of speech. It is not only what he says, but how up he says it. In my opinion, he is annoying. His commentary on day three objecting to the judge’s comments on her right to or not to testify were frankly ridiculous. It is his right to say things like that, but he should know his comments are not helping his client. Enjoy your evening.
Had judge Moreland's findings come in as evidence in the trial, Ashley would have been convicted of murder in the second degree as charged. The judge very succinctly summarized Ashley's plot right there in that audio. This is exactly why juries are instructed not to research anything on the case.
All of her different fabricated stories on top of how she said the shooting happened vs the bullet entry and exit wounds don't add up to anything good. Reserving my personal judgement until all the evidence is shown, but she has told many many lies, which throws her version of the shooting into question.
And yet, she shot him in the arm and leg...it sounds more like someone trying to get a violent man away. As you say we need to wait to hear from the pathologist and all the witnesses but so far I don't see any evident lies on her part. Most of the stuff she has accused him of he actually admitted to under oath, this is a man who would shoot a gun in a house with children if he got frustrated...
@fernandaolivares7926 she ... didn't shoot I'm in the arm 💀 it was a graze wound from one of the other two shots which just makes this idea that she was attacking g him even more illogical
@@fernandaolivares7926Hi Ashley!!!! 👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋You shot him in the back of leg and side of arm through chest. Not facing you. Say bye to Emerson....you're going to a hot stinky Florida prison!
Remember the Doctor who was stalked by the ex-wife brother and family who hired hit men because she didn't want to share there children. Florida case also
@@deannawiederhold3326 Are you talking about the Dan Markel murder? If not, YIKES there's another. Markel was an atty and professor who was murdered by a hitman hired by his brother-in-law. In his case they were all Jewish, but they thought he was TOO Jewish 🙄
Why would he get a reverse surgery just to have a baby with her? Then she denied him the right to be present for the birth and be active in child life? Ummmm. GUILTY
She named her "Sequana", so Doug couldn't find her. Then changed her name to Emerson which is her grandfathers middle name. I still feel a paternity test needs to be performed as she may be her fiance's child, Dennis B.
Yeah no doubt in my mind after hearing her testify today at the long awaited trial. She is a piece of work for having her granddaughter protest with a poster "keep my mommy free" and talking through a bullhorn. m@@markbaz
I LOVE a judge big on procedures. It's how you get the facts on the record in a fair way AND it allows for excelled lawyering (separately from the facts of the case) which is a joy to follow. I hate emotional theatre trials like with Rittenhouse or Murdaugh. I appreciated good procedural trials like murderer Daryl Brooks and the killers of Ahmaud Arbery, even though all these defendants make you grind your teeth. I'll take the gratuitous musings of this judge because it gives a little window in how this professional works and I love to watch professionals at work.
Why? Other than the 30 year gap she actually walked away from the business of her dreams because she thought he was dangerous. She walked away with nothing but her child where is the gold digging? Wouldn't you say yes if your husband wanted to invest in your dream?
@@traveltmit doesn't make sense, I mean the guy has a history in domestic violence, she walked away from her dream business, with no money, nothing but her child...it doesn't sound like a murderous master plan to me
@@fernandaolivares7926 what dream business? He put all the money in and it folded. Something is very fishy with her. I don’t think we know the truth regarding him; whether DV or other wise. The shooting of the gun in the house fishy on his side.
Shes going to prison after telling Dr Brad Broeder that SHE's the expert and if nothing is done regarding Doug, then shes going to have to take matters in her own hands. 😳
I don't know if she's guilty or not, but you would be _shocked_ at the number of things you say every day that mean absolutely nothing nefarious but could land you in hot water in front of a jury given the right circumstances. Text your spouse, whom you love but are in counseling with, "I could kill you for doing this to me again" (which could mean _a thousand_ things, some of them not even angry or annoyed). If your spouse comes home with flowers, no one even knows you ever said it. If your spouse pushes up daisies, you could find yourself in a video with comments about how guilty you sound...
@@jacksyoutubechannel4045right or the sarcastic things I say about the kids sucking my sanity or just other crazy things. I worry a lot about my messages being read out of context or understanding someday as like part of a trial or somethingggg
I think this young woman saw $$$ 30yrs her senior didn’t matter, trouble seemed to come after $$ ran out. Might it have been postpartum? 🤷🏼♀️ with this aggressive Defence Attorney he might be able to put doubt in the juries mind. Hopefully Prosecution have lots of evidence
This DA on cross examination regarding the damn arrest warrant and trying to impeach the witness was so beyond ridiculous. I would have rather stuck toe nails in my eyeballs than having to listen to this again. but I continued to finish watching and listened to see the end result of what the judge ruled. This DA is the worst.
Shr truly loves herself it’s proven she is a liar and take matters into her own ends then she is guilty she should be in jail iff it was a man he would be
I am watching this after the trial and even watched the pretrial that happened a week before trial and Mr Taylor bothered me then and throughout the trial…watching him in this video angers me to no end. Mr. Taylor his so horrible the way he tries to manipulate what he perceives and not what the actual truth is. The way he is trying to impeach this detective is so wrong for so many reasons and I’m not sure why the judge is entertaining this for as long as he did. Mr. Taylor needs to retire!!!
the cross examination from DA Warren to Detective = impeachment on arrest warrant was so anti-climatic. waste of one hour. I can't believe that the judge allowed such a display of ego and relevance.
Prosecutors like this one are toxic, both to trials and to their offices. "Some of his opinions and diagnoses of her would suggest that she has... well, it would probably be improper for me to get too far into it..." 7:50:58 "But if your only recitation of the facts is told by someone who suffers from Histrionic Personality Disorder..." 7:55:23 _Darrell Brooks'_ diagnoses weren't even permitted as a part of pre-trial hearings. Not that it matters, because _she_ clearly knows it was improper, but the wind shifting to suggest she might not be allowed to present the testimony certainly helped her forget its impropriety less than _five minutes_ later.
Who’s here after watching the live trial in 2024 with Grizzly True Crime? Whose eyes have rolled completely behind their sockets and see right through this manipulation madness of AB?
OMG!! He keeps saying ME stated he was facing her. The state should have clarified that meaning not facing backwards but front but right side as that where the bullet entered and didn’t go front to back but right to left!!
More Amber Heard photo manipulation. If you look at other photos, her left eyelid is more pronounced than the right one. She has a subtle lazy eye. Sometimes it's more obvious than others. I know because mine does the same thing
I am appalled by how the female judge on the recording minimised the shooting inside the home. Are you kidding? You have a guy shooting inside the house. He might not have been aiming at anyone but it is terrorising nonetheless.
The Judge had been an officer in the Merchant Marine before she started practicing. She is a no-nonsense jurist. Maybe Ashley was being a faux Second Amendment supporter and just used that ruse to appeal to the single male Trump supporters. If Ashley goes to the gun range frequently, a gunshot is going to annoy her but not startle or frighten her.
The judge we listened to from a previous hearing was completely wrong & purposely ensuring she highlighted Ashley in the worst negative light! That man punched holes, shot his gun in their house, threw a loaded gun at her, & punched their dog and none of that is considered intimidation?? Blamed her for not leaving?? That pos judge has no idea what an abusive relationship is! No mention of him marrying a woman who's young enough to be his daughter, two weeks after meeting her & only nine months after his previous wife died! Doctors do not induce pregnancies unless it's medically necessary therefore, she must have been under a lot of stress due to this man!! That judge was WRONG WRONG WRONG!!
When a person hits or is aggressive with animals, it is a huge red flag. This was probably not the first time he has done this. He picked on one of the three groups of the most vulnerable groups. Children, the elderly, and animals cant fight back.
He reacted to a large dog jumping on his lap,.. punching & abruptly shoving off a hyper dog are entirely 2 difference situations 🤔 The mere fact that she stated that the dog was rendered unconscious ‘is the Red Flag,… One major lie such as this, proves their are others to follow >>>She won’t fair well if this goes to trial 🤓
Actually medical examiners DO decide the cause & manner of death…so for Doug, his cause would be gun shot wound & manner would be homicide. So YES, the medical examiner does determine if it was a homicide.
I'm surprised that autopsy photos are shown. Is this due to this particular courts judge ruling or the laws of this county or state that he allows pictures to be open to the public?
how is it that people don't know what scroll up or scroll down is?, if you're going down lower on a page to view it, it is scroll down, if you are going back towards the top of a page, it is scroll up
No, When you want to view below the screen you have scroll up. And when you want to go back up to the top you have to pull downwards so you scroll down.
@@Elzie-Nou no, if you drag the scroller bar down or roll the scroller button down, it is scroll down. If you have to move it up it is scroll up. common sense. I've been in IT for 30 years so plz try to explain how computers work to me. but in your defense it is different for cell phones
They both sound like awful human beings actually and used aggression and firearms to threaten and hurt one another - eventually escalated and got out of control.
@@slim7435here is the "clearly" evidence? He offered to invest in her dream, she left with nothing but her baby and a uhaul. He was broke and he has a history of domestic violence where was the gold digging? What is clear to me is he embelished and promised stuff he didn't have to get the 24 year old ballerina.
The examination of the detective by the defense is gold, among the more entertaining once I've ever seen.. The states attorneys seem to be in a completely different league. But on the other hand, the circumstances are much more challenging compared to the states. I mean if the recording of the prior judge ruling will come in as evidence during the trial, that will truly be close to knock out blow by itself. But I guess it wont be allowed?
Omg punched a dog so hard to knock it unconscious. I know we don’t victim blame but that just really really disgusted me about this guy. An innocent dog. Gtfoh
In case anyone’s interested and I can’t believe media hasn’t jumped on it yet but someone just sent the judge a letter (it’s in the public records) she tried to get a hitman before she decided to to do it herself!!! Where is the media now???
@@tyreseforren6721 it was received by the judge a day or two after the case closed. But in a way I hope they DO retrial. I think next time it WILL come up.
i do not believe she has a stand your ground defense
I finally understand now why Ashley killed her husband and all her other actions. She was NEVER going to let him move in with her and her daughter. It is not nearly as clear in the current trial.
I agree. 💯 and not because she was afraid of him, she just didn’t want him anymore. So sick. The histrionic personality disorder makes SO much sense. I had to look into what that was. Cray cray!!!
Wowza. I’m watching her trial now and get curious between court sessions…. The evidence doesn’t match up. She’s still claiming he punched the dog when in fact it would seem he did not! Psycho girl…. Sheesh
I do think she is certifiable.
On replay. Can’t stand this defense attorney. He’s so obvious in his questioning. Trying to get that “gotcha!” answer.
His voice bugs me. Sounds like a politician.
@@dawndacquisto Yes. Slimy!
Watching after trial. I did not find her credible at all and didn’t think her story made sense, but I found it concerning how many people vehemently supported her.
I considered those who believed her might’ve had information I didn’t, so I decided to watch this hearing to see if my BS radar is malfunctioning.
I now believe without any doubt AB is where she needs to be: locked in a cage, and those who believe her are simply unable to read human behavior or have personal experiences that skew their view.
😂🤪
She was using him ,,, she wanted money and she clearly said she wanted a baby ,,,so once she found out he was broke she was done with him ,,,he was crazy over her ,,, ya he was angry at times but i dont think he ever hit her , she knew he was not going away with the custody so she planned on murdering him , Im so glad she f*ked up and got caught,,,i hope justice is served,,,murder is murder and its wrong!!!
She killed him she needs to go to PRISON!!!
Wow.. Now that was a bombshell.. He was killed only 3 days before a huge custody hearing.. He would have most likely won his case because the judge had already sided with him previously. Doug seems like he knew enough to do things the right way, and legally in regard to his child. He also seems like he tried extremely hard to please Ashley and keep her happy. I find it very hard to believe that Doug actually laid a finger on Ashley.
Actually it wasn't a custody hearing, but a court hearing where the joint motion of both psychological evaluations would be revealed. Doug wouldn't move to Maryland or stop his divorce proceedings until the results of the both psychological evaluations were released. Doug was cleared on his, and Ashley wasn't. She knew Doug would most likely divorce her and gain full custody of Emerson after it would be revealed she's unfit to parent. Side note: Doug was given full say in regards to Emerson's health decisions, not Ashley. Ashley needed to gain full custody in order to receive child support for her and her mother to pay their rent and bills.
Judge Whyte ruled against Ashley on the SYG motion.
Is it just me or is the defense attorney beyond annoying? I wish the judge would stop his overreaching. This is ridiculous.
Agree , Was just thinking that. Ughh
Over reaching is an understatement..
As a right provided for us in our constitution here in America we shouldn't be so quick to object to his demeanor in court. Miranda rights give us the right to representation if and when accused of a crime. I would hope to shout if there ever came a time to invoke my Miranda rights that my attorney would vigorously defend me against my accusers no matter how foolish he may appear. Just saying
@@leannehartley7928 I believe you have missed the point entirely, but to respond to your kind reply, the constitution in fact does allow me to dismiss his demeanor at any time. It is called freedom of speech. It is not only what he says, but how up he says it. In my opinion, he is annoying. His commentary on day three objecting to the judge’s comments on her right to or not to testify were frankly ridiculous. It is his right to say things like that, but he should know his comments are not helping his client. Enjoy your evening.
Yeah he's like nails on a chalk board.
I hate when we miss opening statements. They're so important to getting a grasp on the case.
This is only hearing to see if there's going to be a trial, there is no opening statements.
Two days of motion hearings....but before I read the caption I thought the same. Phew!
It's a hearing not a trial
The defense attorney is painfully inept.
This judge is so patient!
You mean uninformed about the law!
@@talldave7799 Nope, the female lawyer is lost in words and confused, but the judge listens to her patiently.
I wish these lawyers would stop whispering during the cross
Someone sure is a chatty Cathy. 😊
The defense lawyer is irritating
He's also useless.
Had judge Moreland's findings come in as evidence in the trial, Ashley would have been convicted of murder in the second degree as charged. The judge very succinctly summarized Ashley's plot right there in that audio. This is exactly why juries are instructed not to research anything on the case.
The summary from the other court hearing was off the chain! This chick sounds crazy no credibility..she's a big
Liar*
All of her different fabricated stories on top of how she said the shooting happened vs the bullet entry and exit wounds don't add up to anything good. Reserving my personal judgement until all the evidence is shown, but she has told many many lies, which throws her version of the shooting into question.
The bullet entry? They testified the bullet came from the front 💀 the only one that came from behind was the leg
And yet, she shot him in the arm and leg...it sounds more like someone trying to get a violent man away. As you say we need to wait to hear from the pathologist and all the witnesses but so far I don't see any evident lies on her part. Most of the stuff she has accused him of he actually admitted to under oath, this is a man who would shoot a gun in a house with children if he got frustrated...
@fernandaolivares7926 she ... didn't shoot I'm in the arm 💀 it was a graze wound from one of the other two shots which just makes this idea that she was attacking g him even more illogical
@@fernandaolivares7926Hi Ashley!!!! 👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋You shot him in the back of leg and side of arm through chest. Not facing you. Say bye to Emerson....you're going to a hot stinky Florida prison!
This defence attorney is not good… 😐
Married 13 days after they met lol ridiculous
Right..lol
Meh, it happens.
@@mariee.5912 haha and and so does murder apparently
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
@@robyn874 hah nice one a picture really does say a thousand words .
Who’s the attorney for the defendant in this case? I’d be worried about his representation if I were the defendant! 🤦🏻♀️
She could have done better. IMO the prosecution brought more credibility to the defendant’s story than he did! Shame!
I dislike how the defendant's lawyer kisses up YUK
I laughed when the judge said “Enough with the platitudes.”
He sees through it as well.
IMO She Didn't want to share the Daughter how involved was her Mother?
Remember the Doctor who was stalked by the ex-wife brother and family who hired hit men because she didn't want to share there children. Florida case also
And was Murdered. Apparently her family members didn't like the fact he was Jewish
@@deannawiederhold3326 Are you talking about the Dan Markel murder? If not, YIKES there's another. Markel was an atty and professor who was murdered by a hitman hired by his brother-in-law. In his case they were all Jewish, but they thought he was TOO Jewish 🙄
@@dawndacquisto Yes I am. I wonder how it's going on bring charges to the brother?
Shooting the dude 3 days before custody hearing does not work well for defense!!
Guilty af.
For all those who are asking if this is a bench trial or jury trial. It's a HEARING. . read the description.
Thank you!
Thanks for clarifying, I saw that, but did not realize what that meant.
Those Dr.s Got his info from her. Not that it was fact. Also why would this guy be biased in his investigation?
Okay so this lady killed her husband cold blood. He didn't seem aggressive with her at all.
Why would he get a reverse surgery just to have a baby with her? Then she denied him the right to be present for the birth and be active in child life? Ummmm. GUILTY
*meal ticket baby*
He got set up! it was a shake down since day one. She probably get it from her momma!
Meal ticket Money to support her and his baby along with the Defendants Mother 😪 Makes me sick 🤢
She named her "Sequana", so Doug couldn't find her. Then changed her name to Emerson which is her grandfathers middle name. I still feel a paternity test needs to be performed as she may be her fiance's child, Dennis B.
Yeah no doubt in my mind after hearing her testify today at the long awaited trial. She is a piece of work for having her granddaughter protest with a poster "keep my mommy free" and talking through a bullhorn. m@@markbaz
I like this judge 👨⚖️
I love this judge!
She tried to go out the door to de-escalate. She asked him to leave. I do not understand why this is not stand your ground.
He admitted to most of her allegations too
When is the freaking decision? I keep checking and can’t find it!!
I really like this judge!
I know this is just a Hearing but my God when this goes to trial its gonna be a long trial.
I LOVE a judge big on procedures. It's how you get the facts on the record in a fair way AND it allows for excelled lawyering (separately from the facts of the case) which is a joy to follow. I hate emotional theatre trials like with Rittenhouse or Murdaugh. I appreciated good procedural trials like murderer Daryl Brooks and the killers of Ahmaud Arbery, even though all these defendants make you grind your teeth. I'll take the gratuitous musings of this judge because it gives a little window in how this professional works and I love to watch professionals at work.
Ridiculous murder homicide. All the same
Sounds like a gold digger and sugar daddy situation gone terribly tragic 😰
I just don’t get her long term plan. Pretend together until after they dismiss court issues then shoot him?
@@traveltm Yeah, her “poisoning plan” failed and she was going to leave it up to the courts!
Why? Other than the 30 year gap she actually walked away from the business of her dreams because she thought he was dangerous. She walked away with nothing but her child where is the gold digging? Wouldn't you say yes if your husband wanted to invest in your dream?
@@traveltmit doesn't make sense, I mean the guy has a history in domestic violence, she walked away from her dream business, with no money, nothing but her child...it doesn't sound like a murderous master plan to me
@@fernandaolivares7926 what dream business? He put all the money in and it folded. Something is very fishy with her. I don’t think we know the truth regarding him; whether DV or other wise. The shooting of the gun in the house fishy on his side.
The DA just loves to hear himself talk.
Said the spider to the fly. She lured him to his death
Shes going to prison after telling Dr Brad Broeder that SHE's the expert and if nothing is done regarding Doug, then shes going to have to take matters in her own hands. 😳
I don't know if she's guilty or not, but you would be _shocked_ at the number of things you say every day that mean absolutely nothing nefarious but could land you in hot water in front of a jury given the right circumstances.
Text your spouse, whom you love but are in counseling with, "I could kill you for doing this to me again" (which could mean _a thousand_ things, some of them not even angry or annoyed). If your spouse comes home with flowers, no one even knows you ever said it. If your spouse pushes up daisies, you could find yourself in a video with comments about how guilty you sound...
@@jacksyoutubechannel4045right or the sarcastic things I say about the kids sucking my sanity or just other crazy things. I worry a lot about my messages being read out of context or understanding someday as like part of a trial or somethingggg
With all of that being said, I am getting MAJOR amber heard vibes from this defendant.
Wow
@@kimmy722it’s the personality disorder they share in common.
This case is starting to get interesting
If this is the only argument defence has a big problem
I think this young woman saw $$$ 30yrs her senior didn’t matter, trouble seemed to come after $$ ran out. Might it have been postpartum? 🤷🏼♀️ with this aggressive Defence Attorney he might be able to put doubt in the juries mind. Hopefully Prosecution have lots of evidence
Day 2 is about an hour long, judge to decide but don't know when it will be.
I approve of this judge.
State needs to stop whispering and they are not doing well
This DA on cross examination regarding the damn arrest warrant and trying to impeach the witness was so beyond ridiculous. I would have rather stuck toe nails in my eyeballs than having to listen to this again. but I continued to finish watching and listened to see the end result of what the judge ruled. This DA is the worst.
Shr truly loves herself it’s proven she is a liar and take matters into her own ends then she is guilty she should be in jail iff it was a man he would be
She looks nuts
Is it just me or does it low key seem like something might’ve been going on between Doug and the family lawyer
Yeah their acting like a couple
There is a lot of tension in this room. 😳
Why is the detective Always looking at the state attorney
She's 💯💯💯💯guilty js
Very good sound. Thank you for taking the time to post this
I am watching this after the trial and even watched the pretrial that happened a week before trial and Mr Taylor bothered me then and throughout the trial…watching him in this video angers me to no end. Mr. Taylor his so horrible the way he tries to manipulate what he perceives and not what the actual truth is. The way he is trying to impeach this detective is so wrong for so many reasons and I’m not sure why the judge is entertaining this for as long as he did. Mr. Taylor needs to retire!!!
Guilty
All this lawyer ever does is pick at the system
Ashley and her mother Alicia look mentally ill
7:36:35 Great Judge 👍 pre-trial teaser for closing arguments
the cross examination from DA Warren to Detective = impeachment on arrest warrant was so anti-climatic. waste of one hour. I can't believe that the judge allowed such a display of ego and relevance.
Prosecutors like this one are toxic, both to trials and to their offices.
"Some of his opinions and diagnoses of her would suggest that she has... well, it would probably be improper for me to get too far into it..." 7:50:58
"But if your only recitation of the facts is told by someone who suffers from Histrionic Personality Disorder..." 7:55:23
_Darrell Brooks'_ diagnoses weren't even permitted as a part of pre-trial hearings. Not that it matters, because _she_ clearly knows it was improper, but the wind shifting to suggest she might not be allowed to present the testimony certainly helped her forget its impropriety less than _five minutes_ later.
What a nice judge.
Please Lordy Lordy tell me the Defence attorney isn’t the same one, used by the Ice Cream Killer. If it is this trial will take weeks.
Isn't he the retired prosecutor from the Nicholas Cruz trial?
No it’s not. I thought the same thing too 🤣 his name was John Grant.
@@sherrym921 I've been painting in another room and finally saw him! They sound exactly the same, and of course the bald head! 🤣🤣🤣
@@extremelevineno thank god.
Mike Satz was the prosecutor in the Nikolas Cruz trial. He came out of retirement to do the case. He's definitely not the defence attorney in this.
Wow almost 6,000,000,000 subscribers Law and Crime!
Where she get this lawyer ?
Corn Flakes Box. He was good for the price.
Yelp Restaurant Review section
I feel so truly horrible for this detective!!!
I had an "inducement" because the baby was ready, and the doc was going to be away during the possible birth. Was the baby really his?
PS. When does the actual trial start??
Is this a bench trial ????
Yes Stand Your Ground hearing. Decision by Judge. No jury.
6:42:03 M or Hmcide what is a purpose of search warrant? Is Hmcide M?
Who’s here after watching the live trial in 2024 with Grizzly True Crime? Whose eyes have rolled completely behind their sockets and see right through this manipulation madness of AB?
Hi Grizzly :)
@@LeanneRigby-iy7nx hi Griz!!!
OMG!! He keeps saying ME stated he was facing her. The state should have clarified that meaning not facing backwards but front but right side as that where the bullet entered and didn’t go front to back but right to left!!
Is anyone else having sound issues right now?
When you have nothing attack the investigation
More Amber Heard photo manipulation. If you look at other photos, her left eyelid is more pronounced than the right one. She has a subtle lazy eye. Sometimes it's more obvious than others. I know because mine does the same thing
Self defense 4 shots it’s overkilled
What was the verdict?
Is this hearing happening in Hillsborough County Florida specifically Tampa Florida
I am appalled by how the female judge on the recording minimised the shooting inside the home. Are you kidding? You have a guy shooting inside the house. He might not have been aiming at anyone but it is terrorising nonetheless.
Thank you for actually pointing that FACT out
If you are a family law judge, you hear far worse on a daily basis. On the continuum of "abusive" behavior, that would fall into the middle area.
But I dont understand then how ater the ceiling incident she had a baby ...reversed vasectomy.?????
@@cynthiameyer3255 Yes, Ashley asked Doug to suffer through the reversal process to fulfill her dream.
The Judge had been an officer in the Merchant Marine before she started practicing. She is a no-nonsense jurist. Maybe Ashley was being a faux Second Amendment supporter and just used that ruse to appeal to the single male Trump supporters. If Ashley goes to the gun range frequently, a gunshot is going to annoy her but not startle or frighten her.
This cousin has been prepped to nines
Where have I seen this defense lawyer before?
Ice cream man trial.
@@bettyh6270 TY I think you are correct.
The judge we listened to from a previous hearing was completely wrong & purposely ensuring she highlighted Ashley in the worst negative light! That man punched holes, shot his gun in their house, threw a loaded gun at her, & punched their dog and none of that is considered intimidation?? Blamed her for not leaving?? That pos judge has no idea what an abusive relationship is! No mention of him marrying a woman who's young enough to be his daughter, two weeks after meeting her & only nine months after his previous wife died! Doctors do not induce pregnancies unless it's medically necessary therefore, she must have been under a lot of stress due to this man!! That judge was WRONG WRONG WRONG!!
She’s a kook!
When a person hits or is aggressive with animals, it is a huge red flag. This was probably not the first time he has done this. He picked on one of the three groups of the most vulnerable groups. Children, the elderly, and animals cant fight back.
He reacted to a large dog jumping on his lap,.. punching & abruptly shoving off a hyper dog are entirely 2 difference situations 🤔 The mere fact that she stated that the dog was rendered unconscious ‘is the Red Flag,… One major lie such as this, proves their are others to follow >>>She won’t fair well if this goes to trial 🤓
Correct 💯
@@MitziHartwow
No wonder I prefer dogs than pple
@@loopy1159 oKay Loopy,… You do you 🤠
I would absolutely agree were there a miniscule of truth to it!! She's a stone cold LIAR!!!
a homicide did occur. medical examiners don't decide if it was a murder
Actually medical examiners DO decide the cause & manner of death…so for Doug, his cause would be gun shot wound & manner would be homicide. So YES, the medical examiner does determine if it was a homicide.
@@SuzieB7283 a homicide did occur. medical examiners don't decide if it was a murder
The victims are the two daughters❤️
I'm surprised that autopsy photos are shown. Is this due to this particular courts judge ruling or the laws of this county or state that he allows pictures to be open to the public?
They need to remove the judge from this case he has favoritism for the defendant
how is it that people don't know what scroll up or scroll down is?, if you're going down lower on a page to view it, it is scroll down, if you are going back towards the top of a page, it is scroll up
No,
When you want to view below the screen you have scroll up. And when you want to go back up to the top you have to pull downwards so you scroll down.
@@Elzie-Nou no, if you drag the scroller bar down or roll the scroller button down, it is scroll down. If you have to move it up it is scroll up. common sense. I've been in IT for 30 years so plz try to explain how computers work to me. but in your defense it is different for cell phones
I bet if there was real justice for murder, she wouldn't dare.
If I were her, I'd ask for another lawyer ASAP. I'm always scared the Judge would rule against the defense out of spite.
I always think that!
He is so annoying
Then getting another lawyer would be pointless. Fortunately, most judges rule fairly. Many were defense attorneys themselves
Her lawyer appears to be wearing a ballistic vest. 😮
Most commonly it is referred to as a bullet proof vest.
They both sound like awful human beings actually and used aggression and firearms to threaten and hurt one another - eventually escalated and got out of control.
That’s the vibe I’m getting.
She only married him and had a baby with him to get his money, she's clearly a gold digger
I agree
@@slim7435here is the "clearly" evidence?
He offered to invest in her dream, she left with nothing but her baby and a uhaul. He was broke and he has a history of domestic violence where was the gold digging?
What is clear to me is he embelished and promised stuff he didn't have to get the 24 year old ballerina.
whether the detective did a thorough and fair investigation is up to the jury in trial
The examination of the detective by the defense is gold, among the more entertaining once I've ever seen.. The states attorneys seem to be in a completely different league. But on the other hand, the circumstances are much more challenging compared to the states. I mean if the recording of the prior judge ruling will come in as evidence during the trial, that will truly be close to knock out blow by itself. But I guess it wont be allowed?
Got her defense attorney off Temu 🤡😣🥺
This! Yes! 😂
Should have saved some money for a defense team if your end game was MURDER!
Well at least they were affordable 😅
8:41:34 Ashley was scared of him, violent temper.
I heard the judge say "madam clerk". Do they say "sir clerk" for a male? Or "Mr Clerk"? I've never heard either of those.
Monsieur clerk
Will this go to a jury trial
This def lawyer come from Wish? 😂
Omg punched a dog so hard to knock it unconscious. I know we don’t victim blame but that just really really disgusted me about this guy. An innocent dog. Gtfoh
Is there proof he did this to the dog?
Her words no one else’s . She clearly just wanted a baby and his money
is that really all you got from this? it was an accusation by someone with no credibility.
My ex punched my dog into a river and I had to jump in and rescue him. Just kidding but see how easy it is to lie.
What his deposition stated compared to everything else is completely different. He pushed the dog off his lap.
In case anyone’s interested and I can’t believe media hasn’t jumped on it yet but someone just sent the judge a letter (it’s in the public records) she tried to get a hitman before she decided to to do it herself!!! Where is the media now???
It's false if true it wouldn't been in the trial
@@tyreseforren6721 it was received by the judge a day or two after the case closed. But in a way I hope they DO retrial. I think next time it WILL come up.
@@LeanneRigby-iy7nx that's the problem very suspect that it's just a day of two after the trial
@@tyreseforren6721 I can’t disagree with that, but it’s hella interesting if it’s true. We shall see I guess.
Watching this is like watching "My Cousin Vinny"