The Bible as Divine Literary Art

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 10

  • @bethrossiter1857
    @bethrossiter1857 10 місяців тому +4

    Personally I cannot love this enough exclamation point! Thank you for your tireless work on making the Bible not only accessible but understandable to the modern readers. Well done!

  • @bikingscape595
    @bikingscape595 10 місяців тому +4

    Such a powerful channel. Truly amazing how they've been able to sustain such a quantity of quality content for so many years.

  • @scaryeaglesmithwolfjdf7548
    @scaryeaglesmithwolfjdf7548 10 місяців тому +4

    59:30 yes I feel like the Bible is also very simplified for people to understand but I think it deters people from Christ. It started to happen to me. Then when I picked up the Bible and started reading it everyday myself, it has helped me and my relationship with Christ.

  • @lightning9279
    @lightning9279 11 місяців тому +4

    Love the rabbit holes you took. 🐇In just a few minutes you simply explained what normally would take volumes of books to understand and explain. Thank you.👍 I will say I did pull out what little hair I have left when you didn't condemn the auxiliary writings from the jews, catholics etc. Auxiliary writings are not from God. Example: Jewish groups will laugh and say the talmud permits what the torah condemns. It really isn't funny though. There are horrific actions allowed in those extra writings and thats goes for other religions based on the bible as well.

    • @bethrossiter1857
      @bethrossiter1857 10 місяців тому +1

      There are horrific writings in the Old Testament that Christians use today as if they were biblical mandates from God himself. I mean how do you understand the fact that God commanded the Israelites to kill off people groups? As far as I'm concerned this is the basis for Christian nationalism. And these things are repeated down through Christian history from Constantine to Trump. It wasn't a whole Exposition about all of the extra biblical writings, they were just used as comparison to how different Traditions use different books to include in their own Canon

  • @ccreasman
    @ccreasman 10 місяців тому +1

    On the Catholic inclusion of the Apocrypha, you should have at least mentioned Jerome’s work in translation in which he included a preface for the Apocrypha noting that the Jewish community had not fully included those as “holy writings.” As I understand it, that preface was either lost or no longer included by the mid-Medieval period. That’s one reason why translators in the Renaissance period didn’t include it as they were putting the Bible into the language of the people.

  • @TheCreepypro
    @TheCreepypro Місяць тому

    may we see Your word Lord for how valuable it truly is!

  • @tomdexter6925
    @tomdexter6925 10 місяців тому +5

    Hi Tim and john, can you do a bible study on the right hand of God i hear it all the time but never really understand it, i think its something Tim would know about
    Thanks