Unlocking the Great Pyramid: Khufu Revealed
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2016
- Step back 3,000 years with French architect Jean-Pierre Houdin and learn how he embarked on a tireless journey toward unlocking the mysteries of Egypt’s Great Pyramid.
*Note: A reference is made to a second lecture the following day. This lecture was not recorded.
The Polsky Series is underwritten by the Norman and Elaine Polsky Family Supporting Foundation within the Greater Kansas City Community Foundation in partnership with JCCC and includes topics not currently offered elsewhere. For more information about the series, visit www.jccc.edu/polskyseries
For more information on this and other happenings at the college, visit www.jccc.edu.
Jean-Pierre, I would say is on point! They make a lot of money in Alien talk but the Egyptians were smart just like we are! YES! An Internal Ramp makes sense!!!!!!
I know the theorie of Jean-Pierre Houdin for many years. It is the only theory that makes sense. He did a fantastic job puzzling it all together consistently. He leaves no question unanswered.
Thanks so much for posting this! I'm a huge fan of this man
As a side note, Jean-Pierre Houdin is directly related to the renowned 17th century French court magician: Robert Houdin, from whom Houdini derived his stage name. There's a nice bit of trivia for you !
Thank you so much for posting this fascinating and thought-provoking video.
Please accept my profound apologies but Khufu had absolutely nothing to do with the conception, design or building of any of the Great Pyramids of Giza.
In fact, they are over 40,000 years old and were designed and built by a race of people who were Master architects, astronomers, builders, experts in electromagnetism, mathematics, hydro technology and acoustics to name but a few disciplines. They used advanced technologies in their design and building of the Great Pyramids.
The Pyramids at Giza are the oldest in Egypt and were designed by the Original Pyramid Builders. This is why they are relatively intact and not crumbling, unlike the newer Pyramids.
None of the Pyramids in Egypt was EVER intended as a tomb for some deceased Pharaoh. Instead, they were designed and used for a myriad other purposes.
I am very, very, very sorry that my factual data will be at odds with so many people. The Truth is out there but is far removed from the version of History propagated by many individuals who know better.
My humble thanks to anyone who has kindly taken the time to read this simple offering.
I wish you well.
If there was a Nobel in Archaeology and Architecture, it will be reserved for Mr. Jean-Pierre Houdin. He has worked with passion and showcased to the world a new dimension. Thanks to Mr. Houdin and his wonderful Dad.
It's certainly interesting, but until proven with direct observation it's still theory sadly.
Until that direct proof exists I doubt he will get any serious recognition.
Great presentation!!! Thank you for published for us to see and enjoy this remarkable work!
Jean Pierre Houdin's Theory of the Grand Gallery was a work area of Counterweight to build the Kings Chamber really opened my eyes to how this theory is the best ever to date.
Everything about this way of construction is do-able and as proven all the signs of wear n tear on the stones within the GG floor sides and the Anti Chamber upper granite Great step.
Subsequent on site research proved in three different ways that there is no spiral internal ramp. It has been suggested that it could have been filled at completion however I think that it never existed, I thought or a couple of reasons, for sure people more educated than me has found others.
1. It would have added enormous complexity and work. As the King's chamber and the great corridor show, special engineering is needed to keep a empty area safe from crushing under the enormous weight. Furthermore that area would have to be large enough and precisely maintained to allow large crews pull blocks with a sleight.
2. Even if an internal spiral helps construction, why it has to be square? That makes it longer and created corner that are and additional difficulty at the turned no matter how large the "notches" are. These would be hight unstabilizing also.
@@paolob9699 To counter; "enormous complexity and work" are fine if they are your best or only option. We are talking about a nation's generational project here, not your mum's shed. Simplicity is effective but these people clearly had the means to build complex and precise things so complexity shouldn't be overruled.
Plus, the internal ramp would have been quite narrow, low and near the outer faces of the pyramid, not centrally located like the King's chamber. Less weight and especially precision required. As for the square shape, simple, they want straight ramps to decrease the force required to haul the blocks. Any curve increases the required force.
Lastly, turning a 3-5ton block and sled 90° is incredibly easy with the right equipment. Lift one end just a bit, slide a stone under it to act as pivot point, lower the end and then spin. Repeat to remove the pivot stone. Ever seen the man spinning large concrete columns singlehandedly?
Not saying the internal ramp exists, merely pointing out the flaws I see in your reasoning.
@@RandomPlaceHolderName How can they be that smart and not knowing the Wheel ??!!
@@alhassanait1749 They didn't have a need for it, they had the Nile. Only when invaded by a foreign army using chariots did they adopt the wheel, for war chariots.
@@alhassanait1749 They had wheels ... ever seen a chariot? They didn't go to war with horse-drawn sleds!
Excellent work!
Thank You All ...the Polsky Family Rock...No I mean it ...with Jean-Pierre's invitation ...That Rocks...like goose-bumps, a thrilling wave of wisdom shared with the community...Oh the curiouser...such a journey.
24:40 On video, the blue shaded area of height is where they used an outside ramp from the great causeway. The white shaded area of height is where they used a spiral internal ramp to finnish of the top half.
I first came in contact with this theory through the documentary featuring Mr. Houdin and Dr. Bob Brier and was instantly hooked. The more I've looked into it, my conviction has only grown. I might just be a lower degree egyptologist (M.A - Master of Arts), but Egyptology has been my life for the last closing up on 30 years and through it all, I've never before come across a theory that fits so well with what we know about availible technologies at the time, the archaeological evidence and the still standing result - i.e. the pyramid it self. There's been other architects as well as construction workers and tech-people who's put out other theories, but all of them (that I've come across) has been lacking in one key aspect - one which Jean-Pierre, though he's trying to downplay it, shows to have full comprehension of - and that is: egyptology. Or rather: an understanding of the times we're talking about. The mentality of the day. The historical context, if you will. It's saddening, to me, that there aren't more egyptologists out there willing to subscribe to Houdin's theory, because, if you ask me, it's not because they actually see flaws in it - it's rather the result of a: not even considdering it because he's not an egyptologist and he's been preceeded by hundreds of nut-job theories. and b: doctrinal _and_ personal hubris.
To end on a positive note though: It's my hope, that with time and the comming of new, younger, hopefully more openminded egyptologists, more and more of them will be willing to adopt and subscribe to Mr. Houdin's theory. Because me, personally,. I convinced: Jean-Pierre Houdin's struck gold!
(It's unfortunate that the second lecture weren't recorded since, as far as I understod, he would be talking about the inside of the pyramid in that one. And let me tell you: the evidence's just piling up once you're inside!!)
Cheers to all and don't forget: vaccination saves lives!
Video starts at 9 minutes
Thanks to tell
Thanks
Nice to see Jean-Pierre in this video. I've know him in Facebook and seen his theories for a few years.
No you most definitely do not Sir ? How dare you make such bold claim's and wildly unfounded accusations.....
The Great Pyramid was built by a very advanced civilization at least 20,000 years ago, because they knew that their civilization would disappear due to a predictable but inescapable recurring disaster. All these magnificent structures that we find in Egypt, large but also very small, are a message to us: "Those about to die salute you". That recurring disaster is caused by the ninth planet in our solar system orbiting our sun in an eccentric orbit. So that planet is only around our sun and its planets for a short time. After crossing the ecliptic plane of the known eight planets at a very high speed, it disappears into the universe for a few thousand years. These crossings cause disasters on our planet with a huge tidal wave, storms, flooding and earthquakes in unprecedented amounts and a bombardment of fiery meteors. Another result is a cycle of civilizations. To learn much more about planet 9, the recurring flood cycle and its timeline, the rebirth of civilizations and ancient high technology, read the e-book: "Planet 9 = Nibiru". This book answers many of your questions about ancient history. It can be read on any computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: planet 9 roest
My question, also: Did you record the second lecture? I can't find it anywhere and this information would put everything together.
We are sorry, but the second lecture was never recorded.
Not sure what he's saying but I just feel like bursting out crying.
How did they make the ropes so big and strong - can you explain that. and also can you show how they got the blocks on and off the boats.
Mrs. Christina D, Johnson aka Amelia S, Wodehouse..."Found U"!
A real man, a great research. Dieu protège la France.
I wish this theory would be tested with a smaller scale steel build pyramid where they would try to imitate the pulling of the stones up the inner sides of the pyramid. This theory is fine but I think we need experimenting to see how fast a single stone and then a series of stones can be pulled up to the current building height of the pyramid. Also what happens if there is a accident and a stone crashes down the inner pathway down to the previous corner. How did they clear up the accidents since we are talking about vast quantities of stone blocks being taken up.
Where is the other part of the lecture, where he will discuss the topic of anti chambers (the secret one)?
We are sorry, but the second lecture was never recorded.
@@JCCCvideo What a shame.
@@morningstar9233 Why on earth would they not record it all? smh
@McNea come on , can we for one time let the conspiracies rest :-D
The French and the English speaking each other's language sounds like a painful experience.. For two peoples so close and intertwined histories..
I have the theory that the Djed was a pulley, & two were used that allowed a sledge with a stone to be pushed upwards whilst the previous sledge pushers get on their sledge as a counterweight for the one going up
Starts at 9:15
Speaking as an Architect and Builder myself, the internal ramp theory makes the most sense.
The external wrap-around theory never worked for me, mainly because of sequencing and sheer waste of materials/labour.
If they did build it with the internal ramp, when it was all finished, they probably filled it all in from the top down. This would be ‘belt and braces’ in terms of structural stability, and security. They might have filled it with sand or rubble, with retaining cross walls periodically placed across the ramp corridor.
So we’ll probably never know if the ramp is in there, unless there is a huge advance in X-Ray penetrating radar technology. This is unlikely to happen in our lifetime.
The internal ramps shows in pictures made by micro gravity sensors.
The ramps are there.
Where do i find this 3 Dimensional computer art show you displayed in this lecture?
I suggest anyone who still believes that those few Dynastic Egyptian rulers are responsible for ALL of the pyramids (especially the greatest ones like Khufu) to check out the UnchartedX channel. I'm 100% convinced that an ancient, advanced civilisation is responsible for most of the best work in Egypt.
Just because you graffiti your name on a monument doesn't mean you built it.
this is the best explanation i have ever heard.
u havent heard enough
@@cheboy And yet that still makes it the best explanation.
He's not disputing the who, only the how.
It's 2017. Any updates??
At 1:01:37 , this shows/explains the reason for the twisted core seen at the top of the Pyramid today!
I love this guy. He's like the Dr. Alan Grant of pyramids
More John Hammond than Alan Grant.
I'd really like to see the second lecture of the following day..has anybody filmed that?
We are sorry, but the second lecture was never recorded.
Unfortunately the Great pyramid is not from Khufu's time period.
So he could not have built it.
It is far older then 3000 years.
Khufu is from 2589-2566 BC so that is about 4500 years ago.
Weathering patterns show it to be far older then 4500 years.
Thousands of years older.
Khufu simply discovered the Great pyramid and reused it the best he could.
Ooh yeah and 4500 year old graffiti doesn't mean nothing you all know that.
I think Khufu was smart to claim it to be his pyramid that's all.
Exactly right. The Khufu theory depends entirely on defending Herodotus. Houdin doesn't really have a clue how it was built, like everybody else.
All hail the mighty man of infallible knowledge.....
You do realise that wind, sand and water are not the only processes of erosion for limestone?
Limestone is alkali, and the coarser limestone beneath the Tura casing stones would be more porous and therefor likely to degrade during periods of more acidic rainfall.
Such periods can happen any time there is a geological event causing a sizable gas leak from the ground - either sulphur or carbon dioxide would do the trick.
To say nothing of volcanic eruptions we know to have happened at least twice in and around the Mediterranean since the building of the pyramid.
Most chiefly the Santorini/Theran eruption.
@@williambennettofficial Houdin is not disputing whether it was built by Khufu, only HOW it was built.
He's an architect by trade, not a historian or archaeologist.
His theories and far more convincing than any other so far and are informed by a lifetime of architectural engineering experience.
Coupled with the anomalies seen on the 80s micro-gravimetry scan it's pretty damn compelling.
Something tells me that your reference for "Houdin doesn't really have a clue how it was built, like everybody else" doesn't come from nearly as balanced a background of research and experience as his.
@@williambennettofficial in todays times its so nice to hear a...all we know is why honestly dont know....i like Mr houdins theories still after having critical thoughts, because he legimately prsents them as just that theories. Today sadly society seems to demand everyone to claim tritt before even a coherent theorie is presented and discussed.
There's indisputable evidence that Khufu built it. All the alternative theories are just ad-hoc bullshit.
Does John-Pierre Houdin has any instagram or website for his updates in his theory of how the great pyramid was made - i hope there's an update :) Thank you everyone! im an avid follower of his great mind and work :)
24:56 He seems to suggest that the placement of the King's Chamber relatively quite high up in the body of the pyramid was dictated by the time it took to sculpt that granite blocks.
But if the blocks took 7 years to build why were they placed at year 14? Instead of year 7.
No, he didnt say that. In his book ( and this lecture as well) he says that Hemienu, the architect was planning everything from the very beginning.
Planning and building of canals, harbour, building site, temples, satellite pyramids, workmen city etc all in advance. So the biggest rose granite 63 t slabs were ordered from the beginning, too. It took years to work them.
look here at minute 7 and on..
/watch?v=Bj0RnvIl9cQ
So he said mastaba is the first stone building on earth ..... I am so confused....🤨
great men, great mind, incredible person,
I feel fortunate to have seen this conference
His fellow frenchman reject him , give up his career and now America gave him his big break
Most accurate Theory of all of building the Pyramid 👏👏👏👏
Question is: did he walk inside pyramid internal ramp ???
@@mooblu8837 *french archaeologists rejected his theory, not frenchmen in general.
He was a respected architect with his own business before he went down this road.
Where's the second day conference?
We are sorry, but the second lecture was never recorded.
Ancient Egyptians were excellent architects and builders. Quite a bit of logistical planning, architecture , strength of materials and management skills are required for this.
History as we know it or better said the true history of all like structures in every corner of the world are not 4500 years old as once thought or written in the history books! new evidence proves just about every monilithic site on earth was built by a much older civilazation and yes even the pyramids, sphnix, and other great oddities of the world have mostly been dated to some 12500 years agoThe true facts about all these sites around the world are now being reexamined because even i know that people won't be willing to accept these new facts, that would mean rewriting the history of the human race but why would this be such an issue, well just think about everything you currently have learned or know about these subjects no matter how novice it might be?
The therory is that we were advanced beyond our time 12000 years ago, we must also remember the Earth is 4.5 billion years old but people will say the religious records (bible) says 6000 but thats just refering to recorded time. We don't know really when we arose from the primorial sludge which is bull-crap I think we came here from some other place in the universe hundreds of thousand years ago (yes GOD and Jesus have been around for ever in a matter of speaking) the same for other religous persons but they all talk about the rise of humans on every continent pertaining to the beleifs of that particular religion!
I didn't want to get off track but religion has been an important part of the human condition since we started keeping records but before Egypt, Jesus, and the Christian Bible there is basically no history of the human race except for ancient text, carvings, copper scrools, and things dating before what just about every relgious book talks and gives their description the best they could explain yet today we are figuring out the true meaning of the writings that describe some really fantasic events that ancient people had no idea what they were withness to and could only give their best description of something like a sky-ship as a firery bird, etc.
I could write for hours about all the great marvels we have seen or that is hidden in the text of ages but the biggest tragedy is what I am sure not only what the holy people from ancient time did (Christian leaders) but most religious leaders did was to hide the truth from the people because they wanted to be seen as the supreme power to all without any other text, proof, or person to state as much. thats why the Christian holy wars destroyed all record of anything from the past not that they didn't think it was true but it would cause people to think for them selves and learn new technologies from our ancient relitives.
We know as fact that the Vatican city has mass amount of historic records the hide away from the people for thousand of years. So to end just think about what the US government have discovered and lock away from the public eye like from the movies or show X-files, not to sound silly, but now don't you think every country has their own stock pile of ancient lets just say stuff locked away for them to examine.
Our existance it truley awesome and humans could be so much more enriched if we were allowed to learn more about all these items the church and governments of the world have hoarded away from the light of day. I know this might be off topic from the pyramids and ancient Egypt but its not thats why we still can't find the answers to how they were build and why are sites off limits or if you ever been there a lot of areas are gated off with no access its just time to open up everything to the greatest minds in the world but we might not like what the truth is!
I am a firm believer in the flood but I am a skeptic of how everything rolled on afterwards such as getting people all the way around to China populating Australia and settling in England
@@achristfollowingturnbullma8237 Then you should realise that the flood story may not be entirely factual
He is very hard to listen to, but His ideas on construction and evidence is outstanding. Hard to deny that this is in fact how they were built. He also says there are still hidden chambers in the Kufus pyramid which is very exciting.
click on the 'subtitles' then its clearer..;)
The fact that there are still hidden chambers is a testament to a) the forbearance of the Egyptian antiquities ministry protecting their greatest national treasures, and b) even the best modern subsurface imaging is still terrible at seeing through all that thick stone.
Hi! I just viewed this really interesting lecture on the great pyramids presented by the French architect Jean-Pierre Houdin. There's supposed to be a "part 2", since Jean-Pierre would hold the second part of this lecture the next day back then. Many have already ask about this missing second part in the comment section here. But since no answer was ever given by you (JCCCvideo) and pretty much all comments are old, I thought I go ahead and ask that very same question again! : )
So please, if you do have a recording of that second day, do make an effort of finding it in your archives and post it, because I can promise you that there's still people from back then, as well as new viewers, that would greatly appreciate an opportunity to be able to view that part as well!
Have a great day!
We are sorry, but the second lecture was never recorded.
@@JCCCvideo Thanks for your reply! And damn, that's too bad! But thanks for putting in the effort to find it anyhow!
Nice weekend to you all!
This exposé is very interesting but Jean-Pierre french accent is very difficult to listen even for a native french.
Ummmm turn on subtitles?
couldn't they have zoomed back a bit more so we could have also seen the audience and more of the stage, maybe we could also see the roof of the auditorium
WHERE IS THE SECOND PART OF THIS LECTURE ?
We are sorry, but the second lecture was never recorded.
Is the second segment available to view !?!...
We are sorry, but the second lecture was never recorded.
Preparez votre lecture au prealable afin de lire au public .au lieux d'improviser dans une langue que vous ne maitrisez pas. quelle torture!
Amazing Africans!
Starts 8:50
Great pity about the poor editing and not cutting to the animation in full screen at the most critical moments :(
It is incredibly frustrating. It seems almost inconceivable that all these graphics have been put together and the only way this has been presented is in this manner- Would it not be a no-brainer to put it all together in a well presented DVD production with a clear and well paced narration. At some points I can kind of understand but he seems to rush through all the important pars and concentrates on small technicalities. Its almost as if it is a deliberatly bad presentation.
@@Xythantiops "but he seems to rush through all the important pars and concentrates on small technicalities."
Those "small technicalities" are the meat of theories like his.
The devil is in the details rather than the broad strokes.
Here is the Dassault Systèmes & Houdin's animations about the construction: ua-cam.com/video/3NCK99mQUxw/v-deo.html
I bet the treasures in Khufu's or Ramses the Great's tombs would've made Tut's one look mediocre.
Me too ! Can you imagine the fabulous treasures they must have contained ? I have heard that much of the gold used in jewelry today contains a little ancient Egyptian gold, it was that abundant ! It gives me goose bumps !
Not necessarily.
The reign of Khufu was before many trading partnerships were made with neighbouring civilisations.
It would not necessarily have been nearly so rich in precious metals.
so how did they carve the granite beams with copper tools ?
Definitely wasn't copper it's too soft to carve granite. I don't like that this prof never mentioned anything about the granite that is obviously machine carved.
@@KingCalebKepa Russians on a channel called "Scientists Against Myth's" demonstrated cutting granite with no more than a copper saw and abrasives readily available to the ancient Egyptians.
ua-cam.com/video/ch66HHNANXc/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/hjN5hLuVtH0/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/i8ZHYWle0DE/v-deo.html
Also Egyptian copper is NOT pure copper, it is a naturally hardened alloy of copper and arsenic as Egyptians likely lacked the metallurgy in that period to reduce the arsenic found in that alloy.
Besides which, copper is not the cutting element - the abrasive is.
The abrasive embeds in the copper surface and is ground against the stone with the back and forth movement of the saw.
The proponents of 'machine only' are simply either feckless, laxy idiots who could not be bothered researching the methods for real - or simply pretended it was impossible to keep people clicking on their videos, buying their merch, coming on their tours etc etc.
There is an entire industry of con around people using real archaeological discoveries only to slag them off for profit.
@@mnomadvfx Hey thanks for the information. Might be the first time this year I learned something from a yootoob comment. Nice.
@@mnomadvfx I love how some believe the Egyptians had advanced tools yet the arch was alien to them, as is evidenced by the terrible design of the relieving chambers.
The only theory that can account for the lifting of he 60 ton blocks is by using water lock lifts to raise them. Mr. Houdin's counter balance might possibly lift them to the "grand step" but not beyond. To achieve this he pulls these giant stones up a ramp in front which is definitely not possible. And if he builds a ramp up to 200 feet high, then the interior so called ramp would be of no help as the front ramp would be used. Go to James Northcutt on youtube to see a demo and contact info. Have many answers (due to the viability of this theory) but none of the skills needed to further this theory. Could use some help as my video shows.
Depends how much room they had to work with - people strangely seem to assume that zero animals were used to haul these titanic stone blocks around.
@@mnomadvfx JN is just an old leach trying to get people to his videos
If I'd have to rank the theories from the best to worst, it would be:
1) Houdin's internal ramp
2) Löhner's rope toll
3) External ramps
4) Aliens
5) Floating the stones up
If you were pulling somethi g uphill surely you wouldnt grease it
It would slide backwards make things harder
More than 3000 years..
Where did the intelligence to build it come from?
Merci Jean Pierre.
JeanPierre Houdin is a Brilliant man
the second part about the hidden burial in the great pyramid has been deleted across the board by Halas, he has probably looted them by now
If looted already why not leave it open?
No one could prove it was looted after the fact.
You people are too ready to believe the worst without any real frame of reference beyond UA-cam videos and the greedy con artists that make them.
Very good material, but gosh. It's so hard to listen to Houdins speech, while the topic and his work are so important. I know, that those discoveries and theories are his work, but it would be much better if he would speak french with a translator, or if the speech was done by someone else. The topic lacks a lot of information and seriousness because of the language barrier. But, any way, a lot of good stuff is contained there!
That is not my experience. He is very clear to me with an elegant personal touch
Turn on CC!
210° !!!
He went too quickly over the granite gallery and the use of counter weights.
About 9:00. Skip intro.
ok , now do i on a small scale
It might have been easier for Mr Houdin to speak French and then have it translated to English. For him to speak English slows down his ability to speak.
Question? Why they didn’t build houses using this sophisticated construction method. Look they were great engineers and architects. No only houses they could have built cities like we have today. Sorry, tenian mas conocimiento que muchos ingenieros en la actualidad. Matemática avanzada.Hay algo en todo esto que no coincide en la linea del tiempo.
"Why they didn’t build houses using this sophisticated construction method."
Cost and time.
Even much later on by the time of Akhenaten and Tutankhamun the common people still had mud brick buildings and the elite, priests and royalty still had stone.
Stone was a status symbol essentially.
Some may have tried to build in stone only to have had their throats slit for their troubles.
@Sarah Jean Also with the movement of the Nile which shifted its path over the years.
👍👍❤️ Chapeau !
How can they be that smart and not knowing the Wheel ??!!
What was the purpose of the Great Pyramids of Giza?
The Great Pyramid was built by the Pharaoh as a mechanical device to slow time in order to increase the Pharaoh’s life span. The Pharaoh was instructed to routinely sleep in the granite coffer within the King’s chamber. The enormous mass of the Great Pyramid (30 Million tons of Limestone) has the effect of slowing time in the pyramid’s interior relative to its exterior.
(Rainer Time Longevity Equation T=√D2x M x 1/E )
Hence, the Pharaoh was able to slow the aging process and as a result, increase his life span. The Great Pharaoh Ramses II lived to be 96 years of age (three times the average life span for that era). Hence, the ancient Egyptian’s understanding of the relationship between Mass and Time, brands them as the founders of the elemental principles of physics.
Dr. Robert E. Rainer MD
The reason for which the Great Pyramid was built perfectly illustrates the desire and determination of the people to leave a trace of their passage through this life and the construction of the Great Pyramid for the Pharaoh Cheops represents a symbol of eternity!
Read the book on the website-ul www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com in English or Romanian
(NO MONEY) and comment on the book , photos with models made of wood and brass board, drawings and sketches commented by the author of the book and logical explanations ?!? motivated by the construction of the Great Pyramid of Egypt. On page 59 is a centralizator with some of the novelties (comment on the 78 news items omitted by Egyptologists and I will send you an autograph book) and assumptions of the authors in the order of their appearance in the pages of the book. Leave a comment if you can!
Have a nice day.
Hănțulie Ionel
First of all, a ton isn’t a unit of mass, so I doubt you even understand what mass is. Second, the pyramid doesn’t weight 30 million tons. The estimate is 5,750,000 tons.
The average lifespan back then was greatly affected by infant mortality. It wasn’t uncommon for people to live as long as they do today.
If mass affects the passage of time in one location relative to another, how does time know which side of a mass to run slower on? The King’s chamber is above the ground, thus is at a higher relative velocity than the ground, which should slow the passage of time in the chamber relative to the ground.
Whatever the pyramid weighs, it is nowhere near as heavy as the area surrounding a deep coal mine, and we all know how much extended lifespan those guys got out of the deal. Seriously, five minutes of casual thought destroys your entire idea. Thanks for playing.
It's been proven that lifespan has more to do with a good diet and simply not dying young than any other significant factor.
Even today a person can die in their 50s and another live to over 100 even with great trauma experienced in the case of WW2 veterans.
Needs a translator
Where is his original video? He's kneeling to the Powers the deceive
So the Discovery Channel is just lying to me?
Misleading, didn't watch the whole rhing so it mifht be good but advertise lecturer are not in thw video unfortunately...
I think this is the guy who's friends with the great Egyptologist Bob Brier. I think the documentary they made together is on here somewhere and I'd highly recommend it. I think it's the best explanation of how they did it, the internal ramp. There is tantalising evidence it's there, but it's very hard getting the Egyptians to allow exploration in the pyramids. They at least learned buerocracy and red tape from us British!. This theory and the papyrus diary of Merer found at Wadi al Jarf, seem the final proof to anyone with half a brain, that the pyramids are indeed tombs for god like kings like Khufu and all these crackpots on you tube are totally wrong with their mad ideas about who built the pyramids and how, that are borne from their large over inflated attention seeking egos. The pyramid was, is and always will be the TOMBS of pharaohs Khufu, Khafre and Menkaure...proven.
I find it more interesting that scientist and engineers are still trying to create a theory, but none have explained the evolution of it. How was something built with such precision, aligned to the constellation, but no dwelling structure stands as intact that was built before, and the evolution of that level of work is not seen afterwards. Why were they that advanced at that one point in time? It’s like the Wright brother’s building a plane and 1000 years later everyone is on horseback.
"It’s like the Wright brother’s building a plane and 1000 years later everyone is on horseback."
Well, not everybody are using planes today are they?
People ARE still riding horses.
Try and think first.
Besides Houdin and the guy he worked with did maintain that an earlier temple structure had this internal spiral ramp too.
There are more factors in play than simply IS it possible to consider.
Sometimes it's WHAT WILL IT COST ME?
As economies evolve, so does the complexity of ordering large projects like this.
They also need to be well planned in advance the larger they are.
1:03:57 Mr Houdin volunteers 20 years of his life to study how the pyramids were built, comes up with the idea of the internal ramp, has evidence to support it, and then he's not allowed to climb up the outside of the Pyramid to examine the turning corner piece. Why would he be prevented from climbing up the outside to examine the turning corner piece?
Perhaps he declined to pay for the opportunity to access the pyramid after hours, when the site would normally be closed?
Dan Tyler grounded and fair response.
Climbing the pyramid is dangerous and illegal. It takes special permission. Dr. Bob Brier got permission and had a cameraman with him who was an experienced mountain climber.
That was the most frustrating part of that special I saw on him once...he's there at the pyramid, you see the notch that could prove things, and not only is he not allowed to go up there, but the guy that goes up there doesn't have proper equipment to truly record and document what was there.
The egyptian antiquities authority is controlled by agents of the NWO who do everything to hide the real history one i fthose agents is the clown Zahi Hawass
the pyramid is more than 10,000 yo. pls see wtf?/pyramids.
Sat and watched 8 mins of some woman talking pish , nearly turned it off glad i didn't 😂 interesting theorys enjoyed the video after the first 8 mins lol
Too difficult to follow the narration.
It's easier if you use zi romp.
Jean Pierre Houdin!!!
The Grand Gallery design made no sense. Until you listen to this and realize Jean-Pierre is right, was for a counterweight.
Yes i also believe that the accending entrance and grand gallery were both used as a pathway for the kings chamber granite blocks to be pulled up through 1- accending entrance & 2- grand gallery up to the anti-chamber using counterweight pulley system of ropes, logs and rollers. The counterweight drop was underneath the anti-chamber floor which was then filled in after all the granite was in place
And the ” queens chamber”? Its under the Grand gallery and the ”kings chamber”..
@@MultiDatura The Caliph al Ma mun broke in during the middle ages, it's far from impossible that he may have plundered the chamber then, it may well have contained offerings for the pharaoh.
Use rope to attach counter weight to a 10 trillion metric ton piece of granite that has somehow been quarried from South Africa, by boat. I like his ramp theory, but I don't feel like anybody has done the King's chamber justice with explaining it. Not just the biblical task of moving the weight, but carving it in such detail and precision with what we're lead to understand was copper tools.
10 trillion metric tons?
South Africa?
What in the ever loving fuck are you talking about?
The heaviest I have heard mentioned for any of the blocks used in the King's Chamber/relieving chamber was 63-65 tons.
Also Aswan is still part of Egypt (ie North East Africa) and the Nile flows north toward Giza from that direction.
Not the other way, so the flow works entirely in their favour.
Try actually researching the matter rather than gorging yourself on 'lost high tech' fantasy shit found on alt history channels like Brien Foerster, UnchartedX, Christopher Dunn and others - they are not revealing truth, they are SELLING fantasy.
Yes you heard me, selling fantasy.
Most of those channels are either selling something, or have been hoodwinked by someone that sells something.
It's remarkably close to cult indoctrination the way these people work, though con artists would be more descriptive.
you made some mistakes, the Egyptian cubik is not 50cm but 52.3cm. So start counting again because this theory doesn't match the facts.
explain why there are no texts or drawings like in all other (sloppyer) pyramids, why the supposed second dynasty build masterpieces and after they only build scrap ?
normaly they would grow in experience, knowlodge and building - i don't that in 3rd, 4th dynasty buildings.
this was not build a grave for a pharao, but reused by a newer civilization like other sites with megalyths in the world. After the flood (-11000y ago) these buildings where a legacy from older advanced civilizations.
He did it
That's it, you did it Mr Houdin
That's how ancient Egyptians built the Pyramids
When you focus on the idea, and you settle in it comfortably into you mind, you find that it's both genius and simple
I've seen as a child in the country side in north africa, farmers pile straw Hay Bales inside large storage rooms to the ceiling with nothing more that this concept of internal ramp. The same concept is used to take out hay bales later on in the winter
If you don't see it happen with your own eyes, and you never heard of it, you'd think it's impossible that things would fall on you
But if done correctly, it's really a logical thing not as complex as some would make it seem
They keep using the Hay bale to step on to reach higher levels
Somebody ought to demonstrate the concept, though Mr Houdin showed a video of something like it in Cairo
But you need to see the demonstration with those sand bags from the inside, with the builder rises from level to level with nothing but pure man power
I guess it should be called Man Crane
We evolve, but we don't evolve from zero IQ, we evolve from intelligent to more intelligent, and we pile on experiences
The ancient Egyptian left his mark on history
No this is incorrect . the ramps would have been too wide and would have needed to be filled in in order to build the structural strength of the pyramid .
How so? Have yo done the calculation?
So, you're just going to ignore the fucking huge and empty grand gallery chamber then?
Besides, it does not mean that the internal ramp is empty, only that it's density is lower than the surrounding stone
Likely due to backfill being construction waste and sand.
He conveniently left out soo much !
Firstly, laying the mega amount of enormous foundation blocks with absolute sound leveling perfection,, that also lock into the base of the Great Pyramid.
The way in which the gigantic granite blocks were cut, polished, lifted and placed perfectly on top of an equally matched/mirrored side of another block without having to re-lift, re-sand, re-cut, re-chisel and replace.
How they managed to carefully, construct the blocks with perfect persicion to ensure an exact flawless, straight & highly accurate ascending grade & measurement around the four small diagonal square shafts that point to the stars.
A shocking lack of respect was shown, by conveniently leaving out the very difficult explanation to the high degree of genius skill, discipline & expertise needed to manage, map, plan, work & construct each coarse of the randomly shaped multi- tonne blocks in accordance to the very slight side grade of the (not 4) but 8 sides of the build,
while continously keeping it perfect check.
He also quickly explained the best way to position the Enormous Enigma accurately & precise to True North ,, -as if it's as easy as swiveling your desk chair around and pointing it at the T.V.
The parts he glossed over were not the parts that interested him - he is an architect, not a sculptor or navigator to go into detail on subjects that he was less than expertly familiar with.
The only shocking lack of respect is by people like yourself who don't know their arse from their face denigrating years of a mans work by citing nothing more than 'information' from random alt history UA-cam videos to inform him to the contrary.
Your 'perfection' schlock is an overused meme by the likes of Christopher Dunn, Brien Foerster and others who have no real grounding in archaeological study of Egypt, or even basic science in some cases.
Dunn's claims of perfection are easily disproven by his own pictures which show the stones are often not nearly as flat as he claims them to be in the case of the Serapium 'boxes'.
99/100 when such people claim to have consulted a geologist or sculptor they do not go into detail about exactly how much experience or credentials these people have, because real geologists and sculptors can and do refute them as being full of shit.
"He also quickly explained the best way to position the Enormous Enigma accurately & precise to True North ,, -as if it's as easy as swiveling your desk chair around and pointing it at the T.V. "
Believe it or not, the old ways were not that complex and did not require large observatories.
The ancients had little to work with, so they optimised their approach based on the available materials and locations.
Again, and I cannot stress this enough.
THE PYRAMIDS ARE NOT PERFECT.
Look at the stones behind the casing and then the layer behind those stones
Suddenly the masonry starts looks slapshod as fuck, with any old bit of stone shoved in to get the job done.
Does that sound like perfection to you?
This is how you get it done in 20-30 years.
You make a big effort on the core and first 2-3 layers of the exterior, and then just wing it for the rest between with best managed materials - likely reusing a lot of waste from the casing and core stone quarrying process, which saves a lot on time and effort compared to quarrying entirely new 'perfectly' cut blocks.
You are absolutely correct in your observations and comments. I salute you.
Khufu had nothing to do with the Great Pyramids at Giza. May I respectfully and humbly refer you to my comments made a few minutes ago on 26th May 2023?
he knows more than anyone...they were paid in beer he says...n one team was called the drunkards....cool............................
IMO the big ramp theory is actually stupid there's no way they dragged stones up a massive ramp it just makes no logical sense so for me that's out
No bronze-age people built the PYRAMIDS. It's an insult to even suggest it.
They could've move 100 ton stones.... Or how about the 900 ton stones like at Baalbek?
We're dealing with a pre-cataclysmic advanced civilization.
At least he was right about the newly found cavieties. But perhaps not in all details. And he seems to be very concerned to fit everything inside the egypology consemsus. That is probably not the brightest, if you want to be scientific!
First they built the great pyramids with stones and copper tools. Then the decline starts ..
Not just copper.
First off the copper is not pure, it is in fact a naturally hardened copper/arsenic alloy.
Secondly abrasives were used to cut stone, both sand of various types and corundum powder which is easily enough to saw through granite with the right tools (ie copper/arsenic saw).
Thirdly wood was used to.
Sleds to pull stone blocks along the ground (probably on wet sand lubricant), and to construct the counterweight trolley system, possibly even other counterweight platforms that were used in conjunction with other shafts found around the Great Pyramid.
All this kind of theories have been shown nonsense in the past. That is why we don't know how the pyramids were built.
This theory has nothing new to it, simply rehearsing the previous theories.
You guys should work on not saying "um" so much lol
Aliens, aliens and aliens.
You've nothing to apologise for, Jean-Pierre. Your English is superior to that spoken by enormous numbers of ( laughably ) so-called ' native speakers '.
It's not...
Mr Houdin should let english speakers to describe his theory. He is a good scientist and engineer but not a lecturer.
JP.Houdin as many architects aiming to uncover the pyramid enigma construction, does not take into account the archeological evidences or the physics.
Let me tell you some of each:
Archeological evidence uncovered by Marck Lehner in the Heit el Ghurab (at the foot of the Giza plateau) the town of pyramids workers, leads to a number of workers around 2,000.
Physic evidence: an average block was about 1M3 volume weighting 2.4 t.
JP.Houdin was wrong not taking into consideration quarrying out the blocks before trying to get them on the ramps in the pyramid.
It's like the guy who explains to you how to get a satellite on orbit fully neglecting the first stage of the rocket that consumme 95% of the energy.
Just look: to extract the block from the bedrock you have to cut a furrow on three faces, it leads to a volume of crushed stone roughly equal in first approximation to half the surface multiplied by the width of the furrow, for the average block not so far from 3 x Width (in meter) = volume of crushed stone in M3.
Manual cutting a furrow with a chisel in a hand a worker can develop a 40 w power to cut the stone, producing 0.5 KWH at the end of the day, 1 KWH if he used a two handed pick.
But in both cases, the furrow width is 0.7 m because the worker body must fit in the furrow.
So for a 0.7 m width furrow it takes 2 M3 of crushed stone to get a 1M3 block, as a result you need 3 M3 of quarry to get 1 M3 of pyramid, and more, not only you need to move 1 M3 of block to the pyramid, but to put 2 M3 of rubble somewhere out of the quarry in addition.
Other physical evidence, the limestone making the filling blocks, consumes 10 KWH of energy for 1 M3 crushed.
As a result it took 20 to 40 man x day to get an average block out of the quarry depending on the tool used, so the output of 2,000 wouldn't be more than 50 to 100 average blocks a day.
The daily production requirement to make the pyramid in 20 years was around 400 average blocks.
As a Consequence of Both Arckeological and Physical Evidences, using hand tools to quarry the blocks they were short of 300 to 350 blocks a day using 100% of the town's population!
Did this brilliant architect explaining how to hardly drag the blocks on ramps,
just took the time to:
firstly understand the problem of getting blocks in numbers
secondly propose a way for the ancient Egyptians to solve the shortage problem?
NO !!
Conclusion:
This video is nothing than pyramid building in wonderland, 1:30 Hour of bullshit!
Good to see a few that understand the real problem here. all these theories just forcus on ONE little detail and forget the monstrious near impossible feat the great pyramid is. it is simple, who ever built them let the knowledge die with them. It is an absolutely insane feat , people have no clue... and just watch a video on youtube and voila thats how it was done... lmao. I can go into endless feats on why the great pyramid is still the biggest mystery. but let me just put these three points that cease the deal on why the great pyramid is mindboggling and non explained yet:
1-it is MASSIVE and made of 2.5million blocks perfectly fit in a shape of an EXACT pyramid and stood the test of time
2-Laser precision on a building so large! incredible! Still not achieved today. the most accurate buildings today are FAR smaller and still not as accurate...
3-No tools, no devices, no plans, no traces, no nothing... this is the most mind boggling fact..there are nothing left for clues...
I think you didnt go too far into Houdins theory. What size of blocks are you refering to? The amount of stone used for the MOST part of the MASS is FILLER stone. These are very irregular and go from half a meter to bigger ones held together with mortar. You can clearly see this on the INSIDE, eg inside AlMamuns tunnel or the hole which was blasted in the front. There are fotos of that where you can see how small and irregular these are. The fine white and (softer) outer Tura lime casing stones were quarried with regular copper chisels.
As for the other theories, THESE are absolutley crap, gigantic much too steep big ramp theory doenst work. Same as the outer spiral ramp theory. In NO way they would have had the possibility to control the angle from the edges with was absolutley crucial.( look at Khafres top of pyramid which is twisted). And as Houdin said, hiw to fix at all?? His theory is the ONLY one that will stand the time.
All others are not realistic at all. And this goes only for architectural side. Borcharts', Lehners' and Hawass' ( and others) work is outstanding, too.
@@ast3663 Made sense, until you mentioned that crook HawASS
@@Alexander196210- Do yourself a favor. Separate personal feelings from data.
With this said Hawass is surely not the most lovable person. Personally I cannot avoid the feeling. BUT on the other hand I understand that guy know more about ancient Egypt than most people will ever realize.
@@dealeryard2629 - That the pyramids reserve several mysteries is no secret. But myth do not help at all. Have a real look at Houdin work. It makes a lot of sense. About your mind boggling conjectures...
1 - Outer layer and wells are relatively well fit. The rest is filling!
2 - "Laser precision". That's probably the most ridiculous myth spread over generations. Although proven wrong several times. Topping with another myth "we can't achieve it today" surely doesn't help.
3 - Nothing and scarce is not the same thing. Scarce tools, devices... from a construction site this old and with several other construction layers. Seating beside a major city for thousands of years.
I don't find so hard to believe that over time whatever was laying around as been retrieved, collected, exchanged, sold, etc. If looking carefully I'm pretty sure more could be found. But there's no particular effort focused on that, making any appearance pretty much fortuit. Either case saying nothing imply that every tools, devices... in the Cairo museum and spread all over the world account for nothing.
Tip: Upon inauguration, even nowadays, what's the first activity done on site? CLEAN THE SITE, remove tools, etc. ;-)
Beside it's tremendously obvious that if stones the size of the ones from the outer layer could be stolen from site. More "pocket" size items wouldn't have better luck. ;-)