Kya hai Sanatan Dharm ka Asli naam | सनातन धर्म | Dharma Live | Sanatan Dharm | Ved | Puaranas
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- Kya hai Sanatan Dharm ka Asli naam | सनातन धर्म | Dharma Live | Sanatan Dharm | Ved | Puaranas
#sanatandharma #veda #purana #bhagwatgeeta #geeta #aryasamaj #trending #viral
सनातन धर्म को हिन्दू धर्म या वैदिक धर्म के नाम से भी जाना जाता है. इसे दुनिया के सबसे प्राचीनतम धर्म के रूप के तौर पर सभी जानते हैं. भारत की सिंधु घाटी सभ्यता में सनातन धर्म के कई चिह्न मिलते हैं. अब अगर उस सवाल पर जाएं कि ये धर्म कितना पुराना है तो इसे लेकर भी अलग-अलग दावे हैं. ये धर्म करीब 12 हजार साल पुराना और कुछ मान्यताओं के मुताबिक 90 हजार साल पुराना भी बताया जाता है. Lajpat Rai Aggarwal जी ( वैदिक मिशनरी ), जो एक संपादक हैं. जिनका मानना है कि वेद में कहीं नहीं लिखा है कि भगवान ने अवतार लिया और उनका कहना है की सनातन धर्म नहीं है पूरा नाम, तो आइए जानते हैं अगर हिंदू और सनातन धर्म नहीं हैं तो क्या हैं?
DHARMA LIVE is a Spirituality based Entertainment channel. The channel brings viewers information about Daily Horoscope Predictions, Weekly Horoscope Predictions, Monthly Horoscope Predictions, Yearly Horoscope prediction, Planetary Movements and Its Effect. We also talk about Remedies, Transit, Conjunction, Mythology, Numerology, Vedic Astrology, Tarot, Palmistry, Vastu, Yog, Yoga Gurus and Influential Personality and a lot more. We believe Spirituality should be an encouraging and positive part of our daily life. The motive is to bring Spirituality alive while dispelling fears and myths. This vertical is a part of ABP Live.
Disclaimer -
The information and data contained on Dharma Live UA-cam Channel is to be treated purely for entertainment purposes only. Any prediction or other message received is not a substitute for advice, programs, or treatment that one would normally receive from a licensed professional such as a lawyer, doctor, psychiatrist, or financial advisor. Accordingly, Dharma live UA-cam Channel provides no guarantees, implied warranties, or assurances of any kind, and will not be responsible for any interpretation made or used by the recipient of the information and data mentioned above.
वैधानिक चेतावनी -
इस चैनल पर दी गयी जानकारी विभिन्न पंचांग, ज्योतिषियों, धर्म ग्रन्थों से संग्रहित कर आप तक पहुंचाई गई हैं। हमारा उद्देश्य महज आपको ज्योतिष और उस से जुड़ी घटनाओं से अवगत कराना है। यहां प्राप्त कोई भी भविष्यवाणी या अन्य संदेश सलाह या उपचार का विकल्प नहीं है, जो आमतौर पर एक लाइसेंस प्राप्त पेशेवर जैसे वकील, डॉक्टर, मनोचिकित्सक, या वित्तीय सलाहकार से प्राप्त होता है। इसके अतिरिक्त, इसके किसी भी उपयोग की जिम्मेदारी स्वयं उपयोगकर्ता की ही रहेगी। Dharma Live UA-cam चैनल पर दी गयी जानकारी केवल आपके मनोरंजन के उद्देश्य से है।
Follow our Instagram Page for latest updates-
/ abplivedharma
कुला मिला कर ऐ वैष्णव सम्प्रदाय,शैव सम्प्रदाय दोनों को मिक्स करके लोगो को कन्फ्युज किया जा रहा है।
वज्रयान संघ से अलग होकर अपने अलग सम्प्रदाय बनाने वाले कौन है ?
शंकराचार्य जी को प्रच्छन्न बौध्द कोनसा सम्प्रदाय कहता है ?
बुध्द ही सनातन है।
धम्म ही सनातन है।
तो दादाजी इसमें भी तो वही बात है ,, सत्य तो गुण है सनातन तो अवधि या उम्र है इस धर्म की और वैदिक तो तो इस धर्म की उत्पत्ति हुई ,, मुझे तो आप इस धर्म का नाम बता दीजिए दादाजी।। दादाजी भेंके टके फालतू बकवास मारे जा रहा है काम धंधा करले कुछ।
Phle apna dharam ka naam kya rkhna he decide kro😂. Sanatan jo sabda he iska popularity tab se hui he jab se Zakir Naik ne Sri Sri Ravishankar ko debate me haraya tha aur ye bhi proof kiya tha ki Hindu naam ka koi religion nahi he. Us din Ravishankar ne kaha tha ki Hinduism nahi Sanatan dharm he. Us se phle Hindu dharam tha😂.
Uncle baat vahi hai par aapne baat Ko ghuma Diya aur FIR aaye wahi par 😂😂😂 yah kaun sa logic
Budhhisum ki mahayan shakha ka vikrut karmkand vala bramhan dharm hi hindu dharm hain saty sanatan sirf budhh parampra hain baki sab zuth namo budhhay jaybhim ❤❤❤
😂😂
@@TheGreedyGamer jane anjane main sabhi hindu budhh ki hi poija Karate hain pare parachin ashok kalin vihar aaj tumhare mandir bane hain bramhnone kabja kiya hain ye saty hain kitana bhi haso bohot nalayak hove tum log
Sanaatan koi awadhi nhi hai Sanaatan ka artha hi hai jo awadhi se upar hai jiski koi seema nahi hoti aise to Bhagwan Shree Vishnu ke kayi naam hai jinme se hai Anantaa, Achyuta inn naamo ka artha bhi hota hai Sanaatan vo jo eternal ho, Vishnu ka artha hota hai vishwa ka anu(atom) to kya Vishnu koi naam nahi hai kyuki vo to matter ke atom ki baat hai, Saath hi Aadishakti ka artha hai eternal power to kya Aadishakti maa Paarvati ka naam nahi hai?? Seeta, Bhumija ka artha hai Bhoomi se janmi to kya iska artha beej ya vriksha ho gaya kya?? Vidyut naam ka artha bijli hita hai to kya vidyut naam nahi ho sakta?? Chakradhar arthaat Chakra dhaaran kiya hua, Lakshmipati arthaat Shree Lakshmi ke pati, Gangadhar - Ganga dhaaran kiye huye, Aanand - Arthata prasannata to ye naam kisi se sambandh rakhne waale kisi awastha ke naam hai aur saare ishwar ke naam haibyo kya ye naam nahi hain??
Dharma ka naam Sanaatan hai, Sanaatan ka artha hai koi umar na hona arthaat jo anant hai jiska koi na aadi ho na antt ho usse Sanaatan kehte hain Sanaatan ka artha kewal pracheen nahi hota aur Dharma ki iss Brahmhaand ki koi aayu nahi hai ye nirantar rachna aur vinash me chalta rehta hai Shaashtro ko punah padhe kitni baar bataya gaya hai ki ye brahmhand Sanaatan hai iska srijan vinash hota rehta hai Iss brahmand ke poorva doosra brahmand tha uske pehle teesra uske pehle chautha aise nirantar brahmahndo ki shrinkhala chalti rahi ahi aur aage bhi chalti rahegi aur issi Brahmhand ke niyam ko Dharma kehte hai ye Brahmhand Sanaatan hai to iska Dharma bhi Sanaatan hai, Samjhe maharaj ji, 4 ved to vo hai jo Dharti par aaye hai Vedo ki sankhya anek hai aur ved ka artha Vidya se hota hai Hamaare Shree Vedo me taatvik vigyaan Brahmhand ke taatvik vigyan samaajik vigyaan ka aadhaar hai parantu Vedo me samasta vidya to hai nahi to bataiye Vedo me Britishers ka corona ka jikra kaha hai?? Kahi nahi hai iska ye artha nahi ki British corona exist nahi karte hai kyuki ved sammat nahi hai, Ved srishti ke pehle se the parantu jo hamaare paas jo ved hai yaha unki baat nahi ho rhi hai yaha par unn vedo ki baat hai jo anya loko ke hai aur bhi vishaal hai aur yaha ved shabd ka tatva hai vidya to inn vidyao ka gyaan ka sangrahaalay jo hamaare samaaj se upar ki hai, Hamaare paas jo ved hai vo hamaare paryaapt ke liye hai.
Baat rhi Sanaatan ki to bhaii Sanaatan shabd anek baar aaya hai grantho me jaha Dharma ko Sanaatan bataya gaya hai.
Hindu shabd bhi aaya hai kuch grantho me parantu Hindu panth hai plural society me par personal level me believers ke liye vahi Dharma bhi ho jaata hai.
Antar karna samajhiye.
mahakal ke naam ka topi lagane se koi gyaani nahi ho jata
Is sanatan and hindu same in which we saw full of discrimination like castes creeds ,unch nich bhed bhaw .
There are 7643 number of caste in this religion,how cane we be equal?
Theres no caste system in Sanaatan Dharma its Varna system.
Varna system is based on merits profession knowledge not by birth unlike caste system.
Varna System is not discriminatory its never been while caste is.
The 7643 castes you’re claiming are actually Jaatis, Jaati and caste are different, Jaatis are something to know one origin but there’s no hierarchy in Jaati neither historically it ever been, While caste jas superiority inferiority based divisions its hierarchal while being discriminatory to lower ones.
The current scenario or some scenario of past that we are told or taught or we see is the ruins of civilisation that we see a distorted outcome of once greatly flourished civilisation,
The situation and historical few injustices we see and few because it was not and never was an phenomenon of masses, The caste system and the historical injustices we see was an british phenomenon of mentality and society reshaping dividing and hence ruling,
The above claims i made i have proofs of it once i used you i too have the mentality equating yours but ad the research enlarges time goes it came out to be an mere agenda and distortion of society and west by Britishers there sycophants the west based historians brown sahibs and there west political ideologies.
I have proof of it you can have yours just by simple research factual correction critically rationally seeking the true history and reality - I could not give you everything in a little comment but i can refer few - Read Hindu scriptures in entirety to get complete wisdom but focus on Srimadd Bhagwat Gita, Ramayan, Mahabhaarat, Manusmriti, Vedas and other Upnishad to debunk the myth of caste system of discrimination or so called Sati Pratha child marriage on which Hindu Dharma is targeted can be easily debunked just by reading the scriptures.
Second - Dwell deep into research thorough various searching methods believe only those where multiple facts logics are given not mere opinion without complete context and the research which is highly based on facts not an here and there findings.
Read works of Dharampal Ji, Prof Meenakshi, J Sai Deepak, Sanjay Dixit, Seeta Ram Goel, Jadunath Sarkar, Prof Makkhanlal Ji, Sanjeev Sanyal Ji, Rajiv Dixit, Vikram Sampanth, Aanand Ranganathan, Read BR. Ambedkar’s work and read also how he didnt knew Sanskrit and read british translated scriptures, Read the letters of British era of Macaulay, Carl Marx and many other british servants there lords before and after the rebellion of 1857, Do read them to know how they shaped and imposed caste onto us, These are the based historians and non historians who actually gives facts references logics and there are hundreds of more true historians whom i can mention.
Lastly I recommend you to watch - The Jaipur Dialogues, Abhijit Chavda, Sangam, Def Talks, Sanjeev Sanyal, Vikram Sampanth, J Sai Deepak, Aanand Ranganathan they not only explains and gives facts evidences and logic but they brings based degree holder historians who brings you the proofs rationality to see the history from rational scientific but indic perspective not from an goggle of white men.
हर शब्द का अर्थ एक ही हो यह भी तो नही होता।
Sanatan dharam hi tu asli Islam dharam hai..duniya me sabse pehla insaan aadam (a.s)the jo ki aik ishwar ko maante the koi murti puja nahi thi....sanatan dharam ke kisi bhi garanth me murti puja nahi hai...ram chandre ji..hanuman..shri Krishna ji ya kisi aur ne yeh kha hai ki me bhagwan huon meri puja karu
Kon adam .. Wohi aadmi jisne paida hote hi deivery karwa di thi alllah ne 😂😂😂 operation hogya tha...😂
Terrific! We find the word 'Sanatana Dharma' maximum times in the Mahabharata, 157 times. It simply denotes a set of eternal duties. Of course it includes some duties which are not in good taste. The historical angle is- no matter how much we claim, Hindu Dharma / Satya Sanatana Vaidik Dharma cannot go beyond Indus Valley Civilization. That is one of the most enigmatic civilization. Manuscript evidences for Vaidik faith is very late. Anyway personal faith and pure historical research are different things.
Lets talk in point wise :-
1) There are no duties that are not in good taste, You claim one I’ll burst the myth right away.
2) Proofs of Satya Sanaatan Vaidik Dharma/Hindu Dharma before Saraswati Sindhu( indus valley ) civilisation which is about roughly 7-10 thousand years old which makes Vaidik Dharma itself 7-10 thousand years old but more ancient proof of it are - Gobikle Tepe in Turkiye where there are high chances it was an Hindu Mandir because of existence of Varaha idols and some other Hindu equivalent findings, Second - The existence of prevedic sanskrit in the language of ancient Mesopotamian language and Mittani city which 11000-12000 year old civilisations, Third - Bhimbetka caves where paintings of Lord Ganesh and God Shree Shiv in Yogic postures have been found and Bhimbetka caves are proven to be 30,000-1,00,000 years old could be much more which proves existence of some sort of culture especially Hindu existed at that time as well. Fourth - Read Hindu Vaidik Scriptures to know better :- The geographical, Habitual and scientific proven claims are made in Hindu scriptures are of something that shook world - Engineering of RamSetu which is proven is man made, Existence of submerged Dwaarka city, And claims in Mahabhaarat, Ramayan and Rigved of Landmass shape of continents of Earth and Geographical claims in Ramayan that exist today in Central America plus existence of four tusk elephant in Ramayan which disappeared from face of earth some 12000-20000 years ago and mention of River Saraswati in Rigved cascadinb on western Bhaarat which also disappeared some 7000-10000 years ago are some legitimate scientific findings of the so claimed religious scriptures or scriptures of faith are something to be acknowledged but it would never be as world continues to see the things with white mindset.
2) Personal faith and pure historical research if one looks at with western goggles and perceive in that direction then its not an issue of neither history nor the believers of fact. If your dynamics to judge history is a closed window of western categorisation and settled rules its your mental enslavement issue regardless of your origin buddy, not the truth.
If the so said scriptures of faith contains something to be seen keenly for to extract real history under scientific critical rationality dynamics of judgment then one must do, But we exclude ancient scriptures just to be more politically correct as per western discourse and leaves rationality critical nature self such an enslaved critically forsaken mentality we carry through.
If you look at claims of west based historians look at historians who judge history on scientific principles but from an indic perspective, Remember the history we are told and research we are described cones with western perspective who have there biases prejudices naturally im not referring every of them has an agenda but natural prejudices are there while one has to look at the works research of those look through both the perspective means from the regional legends scriptural claims scientific findings and comprehend the collection through rational analysis, Which lacks in west based historical and scientific discourse.
@@TheGreedyGamer
Thanks for your kind response. Here is my views point by point:-
No one can burst any myth about Hinduism / Hindu Dharma or Sanatana Dharma or Sanatana Vaidik Dharma! Why? The simple answer is the Sanatana Dharma is a faith that based on 100% mythologies. It is not a historical faith like Judaism, Buddhism, Jainism, Christianity or Islam. So myths will remain myths forever, no matter whatever way we may try and lie. The oldest surviving copies of the Rig Veda dates 1040 AD! That means stretching it to 11000 BC means a full gap of over 12040 years of imagination and hype without mentioning the enigmatic Indus Valley Civilization and we have no archaeological evidences for the Vedic Age to date even for 1500 BC. It was the end of Ice Age. We need external support for this. The word “Hindu” does not appear in any Sanskrit literature neither the word “Sanatana Dharma” appears in the Holy Vedas. Even if the phrase “Sanatana Dharma” (or Dharmah Sanatanah) appears in different later texts, applying the phrase to the vaidik faith or the popular ‘Hindu faith’ is late origin. The earliest Sanskrit inscription written in Brahmi script, not in Devnagari. So myths will remain myth from the academic angle and it is best to accept the verdict of history.
As for western scholarship - it is the western people who always pointed out our great past. It is because of them world knows and understands India. Either through history, archaeology or translations Of India's religious and philosophical literature. We should remain grateful to them. Of course you can name "some west based historians look at historians who judge history on scientific principles but from an indic perspective" as you claim. I am eagerly waiting to read them and check them with their credibility.
For bad taste justify caste system as a good practice through "by birth" as well as "by karma/profession." I will bring tons of questions that will make you un-easy. Also justify in which way “abduction of one's wife called as Sanatana Dharma" in front of her husband! This two is enough.
Now on your claims -
(a) Gobekli Tepe is not Hindu. Finding a Varaha statue doesn't concrete the claim. Please don't claim it with a research paper in a Peer Reviewed Journal. It will bring much laughter from archaeologists And scholarly communities. Also the good soul of the late Professor and archaeologist Klaus Schmidt will feel sad for you.
(b) The Shiva/Nataraj and Ganesha paints of Bhimbetka belongs to medieval period. The cave paintings of Bhimbetka created with different layers of time. The rock shelters were occupied by the settlers between Lower Palaeolithic Period to late Medieval period.
(c) Indus Valley Civilization is not Indus Saraswati Civilization. Calling Indus Valley Civilization ( or the Harappa-Mahenjodaro civilization) as Indus-Saraswati is wrong. Please bring hard archaeological evidences on the Saraswati River. Historians and archaeologists will feel happy to evaluate it.
(d) Just mentions all the "geographical, Habitual and scientific proven claims are made in Hindu
Scriptures are of something that shook world." Let the world know the truth. Bring it.
(e) Please mention established / recognised scholars and authorities who says Ram Setu is manmade.
(f) Please Suggest specialised studies and papers on Dwarka to check/fact check/verify your claims.
There are other submerged cities in history. (Perhaps I don't need to elaborate. Also I don't need
to explain ignorance of our people on Dwarka before the British. The archaeological evidence don’t go beyond 1500 BC.)
Let me know all the authoritative research on the following claims. I want to see who the scholars claiming these: -
(a) "Proofs of Satya Sanaatan Vaidik Dharma/Hindu Dharma before Saraswati Sindhu( indus valley ) civilisation which is about “roughly 7-10 thousand years old which makes Vaidik Dharma itself 7-10... thousand years old..”
(c) "The geographical, Habitual and scientific proven claims are made in Hindu scriptures are of something that shook world - engineering of Ram Setu which is proven is man made,..."
I will feel happy to read them. I am curious check them.
(d) "Geographical claims in Ramayan that exist today in Central America..."
(e) "...existence of four tusk elephant in Ramayan which disappeared from face of earth some 12000-20000 years ago..."
Here I would like to ask-
(1) What is the vice versa? Why the fossils not found in India?
(2) Do you think 'gomphothere' (four tusked elephants) disappeared from India and appeared/ re-appeared in the Americas upto ‘Clovis culture?’
Thanks and all the best wishes.