best lecture ever .... hello sir im aryan kumar persuing naval arch and marine engineering from iit madras .... and loved the way younexplains concepts
It was a very good explanation capt. Just wanted to know why 57.3 degress is taken as standard as if we take any other for the purpose of proving CD=GM it will give same result as it gets cancelled out. As far as i researched only got and idea that 1 radian= 57.3 degrees so we take that value for finding GM.
On a GZ Curve, if we assume the ordinate at 57.3 degrees to be x, then by the principle of similar triangle x/57.3 degrees = GZ / theeta in degrees. (theeta is a small angle). Therefore, x= GZ x 57.3 / theeta. But, RHS = GM, because for small angles GZ = GM x theeta in radians.
best lecture ever .... hello sir im aryan kumar persuing naval arch and marine engineering from iit madras .... and loved the way younexplains concepts
Thanksfor the good words
👌
Beautiful. I was struggling to find solution to that tangent and initial GM.
Thank you sir
Thanks for the good words.
It was a very good explanation capt. Just wanted to know why 57.3 degress is taken as standard as if we take any other for the purpose of proving CD=GM it will give same result as it gets cancelled out. As far as i researched only got and idea that 1 radian= 57.3 degrees so we take that value for finding GM.
On a GZ Curve, if we assume the ordinate at 57.3 degrees to be x, then by the principle of similar triangle x/57.3 degrees = GZ / theeta in degrees. (theeta is a small angle). Therefore, x= GZ x 57.3 / theeta. But, RHS = GM, because for small angles GZ = GM x theeta in radians.
Thank you sir
Welcome
I am seeking to prove the formula GZ=MS+GMSin@