Particle in a 1D Box | Infinite Potential Well Problem in QM

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 54

  • @Gaoshan-k7s
    @Gaoshan-k7s Місяць тому +4

    For a person like me who has just started a topic in Quantum Mechanics, where teacher shows Schrodinger's equation, and leaves the curiosity unanswered, I find this really helpful. Thanks!

  • @pauldirac6243
    @pauldirac6243 5 місяців тому +8

    Another great lecture Dibs, thanks.I think that after 30 episodes, you finally found your stride.And these lectures are becoming fun and informative and exciting.Keep it up!

  • @ajittiwari9766
    @ajittiwari9766 5 місяців тому +8

    Please continue this series on Quantum Mechanics ❤

  • @SergeyPopach
    @SergeyPopach 5 місяців тому +9

    In quantum physics, the particle is not always has discrete energy levels. It has only discrete energy levels if it’s in bounded states.

    • @samuelmr677
      @samuelmr677 5 місяців тому

      😮😮 Ooow🤔🤔

  • @koushiksaikia
    @koushiksaikia 5 місяців тому +4

    Very well explained sir.Please make a video on Dirac orthonormality related to momentum eigen functions. Also address the point, why we can't have discrete momentum eigen values. I have been trying to understand this portion from Griffiths QM book,but not understood properly.

  • @elfb144
    @elfb144 21 день тому

    One of the best courses in QM💯💯💯

  • @jackdeago3639
    @jackdeago3639 4 місяці тому +2

    Thank you for such awesome videos can you made another series like this but about general relativity

  • @adityanastik8098
    @adityanastik8098 5 місяців тому +2

    Plz continue sir....❤❤❤❤

  • @Ankankumar6811
    @Ankankumar6811 5 місяців тому +1

    Please continue sir ❤

  • @fehmi35
    @fehmi35 5 місяців тому

    Beautiful lecture, I hope you make a video on periodic potential, Bloch function etc.

  • @AyanMandal-pk8jm
    @AyanMandal-pk8jm 5 місяців тому +2

    Hi i am a very old viewer of your channel. I started watching your channel when i was in class 9 and now i have completed my 12 th .i always like your video very much.
    I have a doubt in this question that why the probability density is independent of time? As the particle has a velocity it should be moving inside the well ,so the probability density should vary with time but it is not happening .can you explain why this is happening?

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  5 місяців тому +2

      That's an interesting feature of particles bound to potentials. The wave function is dependent on time and continuously evolves with time. However the eige functions represent stationary states. Probabilities and expectation values are independent of time. Even though we can imagine the particle to be continuously in motion (a perspective of classical physics) QM theory can only offer this information. U must have also seen the fixed orbitals of H-atom

  • @DagonFF
    @DagonFF 2 місяці тому

    Hi, have you planned a video about the case of the finite potential well? Thank you for this amazing series!

  • @SergeyPopach
    @SergeyPopach 5 місяців тому +1

    The infinite potential well is just limiting case of more realistic, but complex finite well case. Just like Dirac delta function potential case…

  • @Shubhnay24-x5j
    @Shubhnay24-x5j Місяць тому

    Thank you sir❤

  • @Ankankumar6811
    @Ankankumar6811 4 місяці тому +1

    'Sir when your new lecture is coming' it feels like Endgame is coming after Infinity War 😅

  • @rks362
    @rks362 Місяць тому

    Sir, plz upload finite square well potential for both bound state and scattering solutions...

  • @pauldirac6243
    @pauldirac6243 5 місяців тому

    I'll ask again, What determines the value of the Cn coefficients? @37:40

  • @zhenwalker
    @zhenwalker 4 місяці тому +1

    Which book is best for general relativity

  • @gutentaghallo1267
    @gutentaghallo1267 Місяць тому

    Great job!

  • @RiyaShrivastava-w4l
    @RiyaShrivastava-w4l 4 місяці тому

    Sir pls make video on chemical bonding and molecular structure

  • @VikramSingh-gs1ud
    @VikramSingh-gs1ud 5 місяців тому +1

    Sir what is utility of these 1D 2D potenials n harmonic oscliiator..plz explain where i see n use these in my daily life..plz explain some physics examples where these concepts r used..plz reply sir..i would b obliged sir

  • @koushikmandal997
    @koushikmandal997 5 місяців тому

    For this case Hamiltonian and momentum operator commute with each other. Can you please tell why the eigen function of the Hamiltonian is not an eigen function of the momentum operator ?

  • @pauldirac6243
    @pauldirac6243 5 місяців тому +2

    I also heard about things like the Fourier trick or the Fourier transform As a method to find the CN coefficients.I'm really interested and curious about it.If somebody could please tell me...I'm dying here..is there anybody out there?..

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  5 місяців тому +2

      Cn coefficients can be found by doing an inner product of the system wave function with the individual respective eige function solution

    • @pauldirac6243
      @pauldirac6243 5 місяців тому +1

      @FortheLoveofPhysics great, thanks, can you explain in more detail in a future video? 😀

  • @amankumarnaik1576
    @amankumarnaik1576 19 днів тому

    Sir can you explain why n can't take zero value and why it vanishes as we have also different value of n and it can take any other value?

  • @pauldirac6243
    @pauldirac6243 5 місяців тому

    Are the Cn coefficients of the linear superposition found by using a Fourier series analysis? Or something else?

  • @GEOMIN_
    @GEOMIN_ 2 місяці тому

    Thanks dada ❤

  • @Folorunsho3729
    @Folorunsho3729 5 місяців тому

    14:56 if our system is 1-dimensional, why are the energy levels increasing in another direction?
    Please explain why that's so.

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  5 місяців тому +3

      Particle can only move in x-axis. That's why its 1D. Energy levels simply show the value of energy the particle has, for that we have chosen the other axis as - energy axis

    • @Folorunsho3729
      @Folorunsho3729 5 місяців тому

      @@FortheLoveofPhysics that must mean we aren't really right in our diagram, but we're are restricted to use it that way as it's really hard to get the intuition of how the discrete levels is oriented?

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  5 місяців тому

      @@Folorunsho3729 It's only confusing if you imagine both axis to represent space dimensions, and hence imagine particle to be moving in 2D plane (which isn't the case). Even in the initial diagram, the y-axis represents Energy (with two hard walls representing infinite potential). such diagrams are quite common

    • @Folorunsho3729
      @Folorunsho3729 5 місяців тому

      @@FortheLoveofPhysics aiit thanks

  • @loban6162
    @loban6162 3 місяці тому

    Please continue sir

  • @itsoktochoosephysics
    @itsoktochoosephysics 4 місяці тому

    Sir, please upload more videos.

  • @Gokulkrish-k8b
    @Gokulkrish-k8b 4 місяці тому

    Energy associated with the particle in 1d box is discreate why?
    Bcz in QM we represent the particle by using wave function (Wave) so the wavelength associated with the wave with in the box is discrete so the wave number K is also discrete and the engrgy also discrete ( This is only true for the bounded systems like Infinite box,LHO and H atom )
    Is this correct sir .... If not please explain

  • @Balgopal-bd6lf
    @Balgopal-bd6lf 4 місяці тому

    Sir next lecture plz..

  • @venkatbadhrinarayanan2282
    @venkatbadhrinarayanan2282 Місяць тому

    at 17.32 the video is not clear sir

  • @tulangsodimha8699
    @tulangsodimha8699 2 місяці тому

    You didn't teach how to draw wave function graph.😢

  • @harry-ho9ti
    @harry-ho9ti 5 місяців тому

    From where concept of potential well comes in quantum mechanics.?

    • @1deespace
      @1deespace 5 місяців тому +1

      An atom is a system. The electron is trapped in that system. The electron can't escape the atom. Potential well is an analogous concept to an atom.

    • @SergeyPopach
      @SergeyPopach 5 місяців тому +1

      @@1deespacethe atom system is not square potential well case. the atom potential is way more complex and can be only approximated with quantum oscillator case

  • @deviljetsay4732
    @deviljetsay4732 4 місяці тому +1

    Sir please series me itna gap mat kijie😊

  • @RanaAli-tc4eu
    @RanaAli-tc4eu 3 місяці тому

    Love from Pakistan🇵🇰❤

  • @M.Sarfraz-u3m
    @M.Sarfraz-u3m Місяць тому

  • @rishukumar7158-h1w
    @rishukumar7158-h1w Місяць тому

    16:26

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 5 місяців тому +1

    Keep remembering that a. the particle has a mass (so it can't be a photon), b. that it's velocity is non-relativistic and c. that it has no spin.

  • @rishukumar7158-h1w
    @rishukumar7158-h1w Місяць тому

    22:58