The interesting point that was over looked was the 2nd paragraph “; and all treaties made,” does that not mean the treaties that exist between the nations involved in any dispute, that the treaty in respect with the constitution would become the supreme law of the land! The oldest treaty on this land is the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the Moroccan Empire and the United States of America 1787, 1836. Which would mean this land is the Moroccan Empire and as it states in the constitution in the preamble, that the United States adopted the constitution (they did not write it but adopted the constitution) which would mean the constitution was written by the Moroccan Empire known as the Continental Congress!
Amexem Bey a war was fought in between those two events. So therefore the more recent laws like the emancipation proclamation actually nullified the Dred Scott decision. But I do believe that Lincoln has said while campaigning that he would send the Africans back to Africa. He was assassinated before that happened.... for the record
The Supreme Court took up a case on review that had been dismissed at the trial level. So, legally it was moot. However, the decision addressed the issue of slavery in the context of chattel property. In other words, a slave is a piece of property...he or she has no rights recognized by a Court of law inalienable to human beings. Therefore, the issue of slavery in its pure form was never addressed.
We still have slavery today. Debt slavery being one of the foremost forms. Money and ownership have to be erased or else society will continue to be plagued by injustice. And it was never really about color. It was more about power. Look that up.
I believe Dred Scott decision predated the Civil War-14th amendment. IF Lincoln said he would send Africans back to Africa it would be "voluntary ". The U.S. did buy Liberia for those who "wanted" to go back. Only a tiny percentage of slaves did go there.
Your voice is perfect for these videos Kim.
The interesting point that was over looked was the 2nd paragraph “; and all treaties made,” does that not mean the treaties that exist between the nations involved in any dispute, that the treaty in respect with the constitution would become the supreme law of the land! The oldest treaty on this land is the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the Moroccan Empire and the United States of America 1787, 1836. Which would mean this land is the Moroccan Empire and as it states in the constitution in the preamble, that the United States adopted the constitution (they did not write it but adopted the constitution) which would mean the constitution was written by the Moroccan Empire known as the Continental Congress!
Good video thank you 🙏
Pursuant to the fact that the Supreme court upheld the Dred Scott case, wouldnt that ruling make the 14th amendment unconstitutional and not valid?
Amexem Bey a war was fought in between those two events. So therefore the more recent laws like the emancipation proclamation actually nullified the Dred Scott decision. But I do believe that Lincoln has said while campaigning that he would send the Africans back to Africa. He was assassinated before that happened.... for the record
The Supreme Court took up a case on review that had been dismissed at the trial level. So, legally it was moot. However, the decision addressed the issue of slavery in the context of chattel property. In other words, a slave is a piece of property...he or she has no rights recognized by a Court of law inalienable to human beings. Therefore, the issue of slavery in its pure form was never addressed.
@@twinflames9277 The Thirteenth amendment addresses slavery. check it out
We still have slavery today. Debt slavery being one of the foremost forms. Money and ownership have to be erased or else society will continue to be plagued by injustice. And it was never really about color. It was more about power. Look that up.
I believe Dred Scott decision predated the Civil War-14th amendment. IF Lincoln said he would send Africans back to Africa it would be "voluntary ". The U.S. did buy Liberia for those who "wanted" to go back. Only a tiny percentage of slaves did go there.
where's SAL!
When you're trying way too hard to troll on the internet: *this comment section*
Changing the Constitution is supposed be hard to do! It's so hard to do, we find other ways. Doesn't this frighten you?
Everything you need is in a book called the full story of the straw man cuz it's all mad as me