The is only partially decoupled. There is no pitch decoupling and warp (diagonal) decoupling. To do that, you need some sort of connection front to rear....
it would be cool to show your blender rig in other video. By the way where it was originally modeled and how it was imported? It look quite good for an import.
Serious concern about driver's track visibility. Serious concern about the hectic steering ratio and the steering complaince in the steering column support.
Of course. And even more so when the weight of the driver accounts for 25% of the total weight. Visibility is very important especially when you don't know the track, but those front shock absorvers don't seem to be much above the fronthoop. It would help to turn the heave one 180°. What it may look like is a low steering wheel position.
Shifting the car's weight from left to right will just be super noisy if there are no rubber bushings against the shocks that are reponsible for chassis roll. That in itself is an extra part to worry about. The mechanism is beautiful nonetheless. This basically means you have two springs each responsible for a different thing on the same axle.
Thinking about it, it's great effort for sure. The number of parts involved, especially complex parts is way too high to have any significant benefit over normal pushrod.
A lot of good idea poorly executed by lack of basic design fundamental knowledge. As many other FS teams you end performing amazing FEA of badly design chassis, steering, and suspensions.
Hi Claude, it has been a while since we met in 2010 in Karlsruhe. Your passion for vehicle dynamics is still on fire! Let me know if you are passing by Dubai. I would love to catch up again.
The is only partially decoupled. There is no pitch decoupling and warp (diagonal) decoupling. To do that, you need some sort of connection front to rear....
it would be cool to show your blender rig in other video. By the way where it was originally modeled and how it was imported? It look quite good for an import.
Should see how the AMG One implements it
Serious concern about driver's track visibility. Serious concern about the hectic steering ratio and the steering complaince in the steering column support.
You don't know at what height the driver's eye is located.
@@alexruiz1197 Well the goal is to sit him as lowest as possible, no?
Of course. And even more so when the weight of the driver accounts for 25% of the total weight. Visibility is very important especially when you don't know the track, but those front shock absorvers don't seem to be much above the fronthoop. It would help to turn the heave one 180°. What it may look like is a low steering wheel position.
Shifting the car's weight from left to right will just be super noisy if there are no rubber bushings against the shocks that are reponsible for chassis roll. That in itself is an extra part to worry about. The mechanism is beautiful nonetheless. This basically means you have two springs each responsible for a different thing on the same axle.
Thinking about it, it's great effort for sure. The number of parts involved, especially complex parts is way too high to have any significant benefit over normal pushrod.
Really bad compliance on the rear rocker support
A lot of good idea poorly executed by lack of basic design fundamental knowledge. As many other FS teams you end performing amazing FEA of badly design chassis, steering, and suspensions.
Hi Claude, it has been a while since we met in 2010 in Karlsruhe. Your passion for vehicle dynamics is still on fire! Let me know if you are passing by Dubai. I would love to catch up again.
I could tell it was claude by the comment, before I read the name