A Swede reacts to: Warographics Analysis about what Sweden will bring to NATO.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 тра 2024
- One LINK to rule them all!
Click the link below to reach Merch, Patreon, facebook, and more!
⭐️linktr.ee/Reckyj⭐️
🌹⚡️Don´t forget to subscribe and like⚡️🌹
Mail Me Something ➥ The address is not public, contact me to get the address: reckhousegaming@gmail.com
Thank you to all my Patrons and channel members!
Join them:
/ @reckyj
/ reckyj
✔Like
✔Comment
✔Subscribe
✔Share
Official Channel:
/ @warographics643
Video:
• What Will Sweden Bring...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright disclaimer--"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#nato #sweden - Розваги
Support Recky? Socials? Merch? ---> Everything Recky ---> linktr.ee/Reckyj
Second channel! Recky and Carol!
youtube.com/@reckyNcarol
Some of us aircraft enthusiasts have soft spots for the Gripin, and a specific Swedish couple that just happen to belong to three cats!❤😊
I am an American who feels a special kinship with Sweden because ALL of my great grandparents were born there, because the Swedes love cats (yammer yammer) and because I love the book "A Man Called Ove" (at least I love its English translation).
Recky's channel adds to my love of Sweden, a love which has surprisingly survived Lutefisk (surely any other tradition from the old country would have been better).
Although I do chuckle at the American reverence for the Dala horse, a Swedish tradition that dates back less than 200 years. For Swedes, 200 years is, like, yesterday. I mean, in my ancestural parish of Krisdala, the church that was built over a millemium ago to replace the burned down original is still referred to as "the new church". For reference, my part of the USA was settled only 150 years ago.
Keep up the good work my friend.
A great video and a great analysis. There's Viking DNA behind that flag, Recky. When push becomes shove, your countrymen will make us all proud. SHIELD WALL!
Recky keeping it real!
Thing is Sweden has already told NATO they are fully open to the full militarization of the Gotland island and a place to station NATO defense forces.
Excellent video!
This is a good cooking show you have here. Lol
Hi Recky, if your ever in Florida look me up, I live near Disney.🎉
Sweden and USA fought together in the first barbary war for a little while. USA & Sweden signed a mutual defense treaty days before Sweden became a NATO member.
Reminder recky don't forget to check out the Mayfield Kentucky tornado by colton henderson
God Bless Recky your good to go
Thank you!
Sweden is already paying 2% as of NATOs definition. Somehow Sweden used to have a different, more pessimistic, definition, where we excluded a lot of costs to other parts of the state budget.
Look at you sitting there all proud, i detect a little patriotism there.🙂🍺
With great power comes great responsibly SPIDER-MAN and some money
It didn't sneak anywhere. They were literally checking out characteristics. The Navy’s purpose was to find out how stealthy the sub was and to study ways to detect and counter the sub. Sinking it in an exercise was not the purpose. Think about it … if you want to see how effective the sub is, you’d likely start it at different points, nearer and farther, to observe its characteristics. In fact, you might intentionally refrain from ‘sinking’ it and allow it to approach as closely as possible to study the acoustic patterns as they vary with distance. Apparently Sweden really wanted to sell some submarines.
None of the preceding should be taken to assert that submarines are not a threat. They most certainly are! The purpose of the post is to demonstrate just how unrealistic a pre-deployment ASW exercise conducted for a small carrier group is. This should also demonstrate that the single sensationalistic story is just that - a single example from, likely, dozens/hundreds of exercises. By itself, it proves nothing. The SSK may well be, and likely is, a very difficult opponent to defeat but we’ve just demonstrated that the very notion of an SSK-carrier encounter is almost absurdly unlikely.
The US tends to design foreign exercises in such a way that its almost a guaranteed US defeat. US Capabilities will be restricted, for example not allowing active sonar use, not allowing ships to maneuver, not allowing use of ASW helos or bringing in P-3 or P-8 support. Its designed to be a very difficult scenario where a US ship won't have most of its advantages, while the foreign opposing force will. You learn much more from defeats in life than you do from won scenarios. This isn't to take away from the very capable platforms allies possess, but one reason why you have to take these exercises with a massive grain of salt.
1.2% is better than 0%.
Hey I recommend you react to another warograthics video called nato who pays and who doesn’t
Can you do motivation by nick nittoli brother!!!!
Thank you for the very interesting and video as well as your very informative reaction and analysis. Sweden has been helping out NATO for a long time. And I know that the U.S. would have come to the aid of Sweden all along but now it's official.
OMG!, backstab your neighbor. American would never do anything like that. L.O.L . Welcome to NATO.
Recky did you drool on your shirt before the video? The Parents of no one country are prepared for the war that could take their child, I am one of them as my son is a US Marine.
Sweden is big for NATO because of the militarization of future arctic trade routes.
21st Century Kalmar Union.
Yes! Love that you knew about that Union!
Your medical is not free your taxes, high taxes pay for the type of medical that they give everybody.
Sure! You are very correct. But then again going to the doctor costs me 30 USD. And if I need surgery… I only pay 10 bucks a night during recovery. And this is for everyone. No matter if you are high income or low income. So what do I choose? Highly taxes? Or the US?
Sweden pays about half, per person, for healthcare, compared to the US.
*United States $12,555*
Switzerland $8,049
Germany $8,011
Austria $7,275
Netherlands $6,729
France $6,630
Belgium $6,600
*Sweden $6,438*
Australia $6,372
Canada $6,319
United Kingdom $5,493
Japan $5251
Sweden has announced that it intends to increase military spending 64% by 2028. Ultimately, all of the government social services/programs that Swedish people enjoy, including healthcare, will be wiped away to pay for bombs, missiles, fighter jets (etc.)
Recky, if it's any consolation to your more pacifist countrymen, Sweden joining NATO helps defend the smaller nations who were formerly part of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact.
Well this American welcomes Sweden to NATO. And as for some Americans being upset that the US is frequently called upon to help protect other countries, that is not so for me. At the close of WW2, most of Europe was in shambles. The US was only nation that was unharmed from WW2 and we became the world's cop. If that vacuum had not been filled, some other less generous country would have stepped in. I have learned two patriotic expressions, one of Ukraine: Slava Ukraini and for Israel: Am Israel Chai. I think I need to learn one for Sweden.
The great heathen army roses again to strike fear in the heart of the enemy!!!!!!
RAGNAR !!!!!!!!