No comment. Destruction and disposal of the villages 1987.02

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @Majorowiec
    @Majorowiec 7 років тому +7

    Can I ask what was the point of those actions? Those houses were too radioactive or what ?

    • @Ruvik92
      @Ruvik92 5 років тому +4

      I think it was to make more space to bury more stuff

    • @kristianmucaji9420
      @kristianmucaji9420 5 років тому +3

      The whole area was contaminated, so they had to destroy their homes.

    • @Ruvik92
      @Ruvik92 5 років тому +7

      Kristian Mucaji to stop people coming back to Chernobyl and pripyet to live

    • @kristianmucaji9420
      @kristianmucaji9420 5 років тому +1

      @@Ruvik92 That's a good example. Actually, people won't be able to live here for at least 20.000 years.

    • @Ruvik92
      @Ruvik92 5 років тому +1

      Kristian Mucaji I read this somewhere they knocked them down for this reason :)

  • @yyykot3455
    @yyykot3455 5 років тому +1

    На камере видно как радиация "кричит"

  • @Elevona
    @Elevona 3 місяці тому

    what is the name of this vehicle looks like t72 designated for radiation

    • @SinsBird
      @SinsBird 3 місяці тому

      Military engineering vehicle IMR-1 (ИМР-1).

  • @EstCrossings
    @EstCrossings 4 роки тому +1

    The asbestos was probably more dangerous than the radiation.

    • @lex1945
      @lex1945 4 роки тому +4

      Radioactive dust on the roofs were the real killers. Skin not protected by masks were covered in radio active dust, and due to sweating of the crews,that stuff sticked on their skin.

  • @Jeffcrocodile
    @Jeffcrocodile 5 років тому +1

    why not just leave this alone?

    • @Jeffcrocodile
      @Jeffcrocodile 5 років тому

      @@internetbodhi1009 i saw they were washing the roofs with some chemicals in the city. Couldn't they do the same there? At least it wouldn't be that bad for the liquidators

    • @motiejus8805
      @motiejus8805 5 років тому +1

      @@Jeffcrocodile I don't think they would be destroying abandoned houses if they had better alternatives

    • @lucianguestErhan
      @lucianguestErhan 5 років тому

      @@Jeffcrocodile they was too big

    • @lex1945
      @lex1945 4 роки тому +1

      @@Jeffcrocodile washing down roofs with chemicals caused even more problems, due to capillair effects. They should've vacuum cleaned that stuff. Would've been even more easier. But these guys were on a time clock and lots of things were completely new under these circumstances back then.

    • @r9d63
      @r9d63 3 роки тому

      because its too radioactive, to just leave it there