Hawker Sea Fury incredible display Hahnweide 2013

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2025
  • Wunderschönes Display der Hawker Sea Fury Sea am Samstag auf der Hahnweide 2013. Die Rauchentwickler an den Flügelspitzen zaubern beeindruckende Bilder am Himmel, auch wenn das im Video nicht gut sichtbar ist. Ich habe mich beim Filmen lieber auf das Flugzeug konzentriert, was schwierig genug sein kann. Die Hawker Sea Fury ist eines der schnellsten propellergetriebenen Jagtflugzeuge, ausgestattet mit einem Wright R-3350 Motor mit 2.480PS. Die Leistung wurde bei dieser Rennmaschine auf 2900PS gesteigert. Einfach zurücklehnen und genießen!
    Beautiful display of the Hawker Sea Fury Sea on Saturday at Hahnweide 2013. The smoke generators on the wingtips make nice pictures in the sky, even if it is not visible in the video. I prefer to concentrate at filming the plane, which can be difficult enough. The Hawker Sea Fury is one of the fastest propeller fighters, equipped with a Wright R-3350 engine with 2.480PS. The output has been increased in this modified racing aircraft to 2900PS. Just sit back and enjoy!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 309

  • @williamferry3096
    @williamferry3096 10 років тому +4

    Magnificent aeroplane and a wonderful display. What a show.!
    Thank you for posting this.. one of my very favourite aircraft.
    WF

  • @eisenbahntraeumer
    @eisenbahntraeumer 2 роки тому +3

    One of the greatest Displays i ever saw at that airshow!

    • @PulsoJango
      @PulsoJango  2 роки тому +1

      All history now...
      Who knows if there will ever be another one.

  • @willemlambertspensionado6495
    @willemlambertspensionado6495 8 років тому +3

    Fine display, Nice Airplane and a very good Pilot

  • @spitvace
    @spitvace 8 років тому +23

    It's nice to see it's in the air again - never thought it would happen. This plane used to belong to a friend of mine Carey, who died when he crashed it at an air show in Canada. Carey would be pleased it's flying again too.

  • @genearbogast7525
    @genearbogast7525 8 років тому +2

    Wow! A beautiful airplane with an excellent pilot who understands momentum and airspeed.Cool Australian Navy Markings and a beautiful day for an air show.GREAT VIDEO

    • @hughgordon9527
      @hughgordon9527 6 років тому

      Gene arbogast no ball and chain on the leg of the kangaroo, not been near a rn squadron fitter recently😈😈😈😈😈😈

  • @42percent
    @42percent 11 років тому +8

    What a beautiful sound!

  • @boogie153
    @boogie153 9 років тому

    War 2013 auch vor Ort, das Display der SeaFury war eines der eindruckvollsten !!

  • @mrrolandlawrence
    @mrrolandlawrence 6 років тому +1

    now thats what i call straight crease free skin! wow what an amazing resto. hats off to the guys for such an amazing quality job.

  • @TheBlackPandora
    @TheBlackPandora 11 років тому

    Jedes Mal ein Genuss, diese Show mit der Sea Fury

  • @taipan185
    @taipan185 11 років тому +6

    man you gotta love the sound of these old planes, awesome

  • @eromadrol
    @eromadrol 10 років тому +5

    Beautiful video, danke schön ! And no f... music !... Just the pure sound of the engine !... ;-))

  • @havoc092
    @havoc092 8 років тому

    Truly an amazing piece of aeronautics there. First saw one of these at an airshow as a kid and was wowed. Actually took shelter under a wing during a short rainstorm. Classy, powerful and amazing to look at as well. Triple threat!

  • @michaelmartinez1345
    @michaelmartinez1345 7 років тому +2

    Awesome! What a beautiful airplane! Great pilot also...

  • @Vulcancruiser
    @Vulcancruiser 3 роки тому

    Sea Fury always a terrific show......just wows the crowd........

  • @jaekib
    @jaekib 9 років тому

    That sure has a lovely sound as it passes. I can't get enough of the song of the super-supercharger.

  • @horse54a
    @horse54a 10 років тому +9

    I love the British Air Industry, they can take goofy and turn it into a world beater, they have shown it over and over again!

    • @pooguts9997
      @pooguts9997 7 років тому

      That's an Australian plane not British

    • @idleonlooker1078
      @idleonlooker1078 7 років тому +8

      pooguts 999 BALLS!! The Hawker Sea Fury is a BRITISH designed and produced aircraft. This one is only painted in Royal Australian Navy markings. Twit!

    • @ixlr8677
      @ixlr8677 7 років тому

      f1 pancake 12. not

    • @jamesbartlett5640
      @jamesbartlett5640 Рік тому

      @@pooguts9997 Hawker British ;)

  • @martinholt3082
    @martinholt3082 11 років тому +5

    Excellent camera work, well done that 'man'!

    • @PulsoJango
      @PulsoJango  11 років тому

      Thanks!

    • @martinholt3082
      @martinholt3082 11 років тому

      PulsoJango My pleasure! A lovely video to watch! Mart.

  • @Xynudu
    @Xynudu 10 років тому +10

    Sure looks good in RAN colours with the red kangaroo. Nice flying.

  • @kimmr100
    @kimmr100 10 років тому

    Nice to see this Sea Fury in action. It is painted as a Royal Australian Navy aircraft with NW indicating RAN air station HMAS Albatross, at Nowra, about 100 mles south of Sydney. I saw the last two RAN Sea Furies do a 'beat-up' of the airfield just before they were taken out of service. It was a very impressive performance I can assure you. BTW they had a five-blade prop not the four here - but great show and thank you for posting.

    • @MarsFKA
      @MarsFKA 5 років тому

      One day, in 1969, I was at Bankstown airport in Sydney and saw two Ex-RAN Sea Furys parked on the grass. One of them was in the same colours as the aircraft in this video - who knows? It may even be the same aircraft - but both had been out in the open for along time as the perspex canopies had gone opaque and the paintwork badly deteriorated.
      In a nearby hangar were two of the P51s that had been recovered after years in the open at the Maralinga nuclear test site, but that's another story.

  • @manfredbeuth2921
    @manfredbeuth2921 Рік тому

    Phantastic!!!!!!

  • @terryplew3333
    @terryplew3333 7 років тому +2

    Probably the best fighter plane of WW2.

    • @terrywalsh458
      @terrywalsh458 4 роки тому +1

      Only prototypes of the Fury and Sea Fury were flying during 1945 and neither ever saw any action in WW2!

  • @fleetwoodmac4123
    @fleetwoodmac4123 4 роки тому

    Bit of a masterclass.

  • @MrHawkwind
    @MrHawkwind 8 років тому +2

    Great video, thanks :).

  • @michaelnaisbitt1590
    @michaelnaisbitt1590 4 роки тому

    One of the fastest prop powered planes to seecombat

  • @jameswebb4593
    @jameswebb4593 11 років тому +3

    The Fury was being developed during WW2 as a smaller version of the Tempest Mk2. The RAF had by then committed its future fighters to be Jets.Subsequently the RN purchased the aircraft but modifications to enable carrier operations delayed its active service.The same applies to the Grumman Bearcat and Tigercat.

  • @mitymo1968
    @mitymo1968 10 років тому +2

    we had the sea fury during the Korean War was flown off the carrier Sydney

  • @lyleholland5580
    @lyleholland5580 10 років тому +1

    Love this plane.

  • @elciomendes7329
    @elciomendes7329 7 років тому

    What an awesome beast!

  • @balalaika1998
    @balalaika1998 6 років тому

    Very beautiful airplane.

  • @TheFunkhouser
    @TheFunkhouser 9 років тому +2

    So no Tempest V's flying today? Very sad! :(

  • @christisgod3354
    @christisgod3354 8 років тому +2

    Love the sound of the ginormous radial.

    • @johncrispin2118
      @johncrispin2118 4 роки тому

      A better sound is the proper engine ( Centaurus) less guttural than the American ohv radial. Check out Nick Graces FB 11

    • @charleswesley3642
      @charleswesley3642 2 роки тому

      @@johncrispin2118 The Centurion sleeve valve engine was not a great engine. It was very hard to maintain. It also didn't provide good cylinder sleeve heat transfer.

    • @johncrispin2118
      @johncrispin2118 2 роки тому

      Thanks for the reply. Is your comment based on experience ?did you ever work on them ?) I can understand your argument about heat transfer however the Bristol Centaurus smaller brother the Bristol Hercules (14 cylinder also a sleeve valver designed by Roy Fedden and team ) holds a record for longest periods between service and over 20,000 hours overall life.
      I would guess perhaps the engine being unorthodox as a sleeve valve , not American, and not ohv conventional design rather daunted the regular technicians raised on such designs.
      I can recommend Bill Gunstons book about Bristol aero engines simply titled ‘Fedden’ for a very full biographical account of the development of these engines and thier ohv brethren Pegasus, Mercury et al

    • @charleswesley3642
      @charleswesley3642 2 роки тому

      @@johncrispin2118 No I have not worked on them . But the number of extra parts is that many more failure parts. The extra ( sleeve crank ) and bearings are actually an exercise in futility. As for the 20,000 hour engine , I don't think so . 2000 hrs is a maybe. Piston land and ring wear doesn't go away. Bearing wear doesn't is pretty constant in all engines. A 2 cycle engine with all the superchargers has no valve train and a roller crank would have been less efficient but a hell of a lot more power. I really can't grasp the need for a slave valve engine. A Wright Radial engine that has a valve problem can be repaired quickly and flown within a couple of hours. If a sleeve valve grenades so does the engine. If a whole cylinder is blown off the Wright Radial it can fly you home. I think it's an English thing.

    • @johncrispin2118
      @johncrispin2118 2 роки тому

      Charles,
      How did I guess you are American ? seems to be an American thing to want to criticise Bristol engines. I was not making it up,about the Hercules hours rating TBO.
      See Barnes “ Bristol aircraft” . To save any further nationalistic bickering ( really futile) I will not comment on the bit about more parts ????
      Oh something to make you really wince check out the RR “crecy “ engine a two stroke (cycle) sleeve valve no less .. all the best.
      Ps Fedden and Wright did quite a lot of collaboration on radials in the ‘ 20’s as he (Fedden) was trying to sell his v successful (ohv) Jupiter engine.

  • @michelleroberts5472
    @michelleroberts5472 6 років тому +5

    It's such a pity the Bristol Centaurus engine is being replaced by the pw2800 I can understand the need to change as the Centaurus engine is no longer obtainable owing to the small number made in comparison with the pw 2800

    • @cnnw3929
      @cnnw3929 5 років тому

      Yes, and this makes it sound like just another radial engine with a 4-blade prop.

  • @horse54a
    @horse54a 10 років тому +7

    That motor is just loping along and the body is holding on for dear life, my goodness what power!

    • @TheFunkhouser
      @TheFunkhouser 9 років тому

      Horrace Foster Yeah I think the fastest prop driven single engined, single seated WW2 *designed* fighter ever made. I may be wrong... maybe ;)

    • @playtrudo8224
      @playtrudo8224 9 років тому

      ***** - 460mph 2,480hp -

    • @breadnoodle
      @breadnoodle 9 років тому +1

      +TheFunkhouser
      Do 335 was (maybe not?) the fastest
      Only few were made but it flew and maybe fought

    • @breadnoodle
      @breadnoodle 9 років тому

      *****
      I know

    • @barrierodliffe4155
      @barrierodliffe4155 6 років тому

      The Do 335 was only made in very low numbers and was never in active service, It was fast but not the fastest and had a few problems, another too late for the war.

  • @craigpennington1251
    @craigpennington1251 7 років тому +1

    Sea Furys are bad ass. Thanks for a great performance. Most Furys have American engines because the Bristol is extinct. You just can't find them. These planes are kept alive with the Wright engine. A little modification and you got a real going machine.

  • @burtgummer463
    @burtgummer463 7 років тому

    Wouldn't mind flying that!

  • @nevillecreativitymentor
    @nevillecreativitymentor 6 років тому

    Wooah ... suddenly the FW190 and the Sea Fury looked ditto!!

  • @billfarley9167
    @billfarley9167 Рік тому

    Was in Canadian naval aviation from 1950 to 1960. The Hawker Sea Fury was our frontline fighter at the time. We had two squadrons, VF870 and VF 871. They had the Centaurus engine with cartridge starting, a 5 stage supercharger and a five bladed propellor. Don't know what this engine is because it has a battery starter and a four bladed prop. Anyone know what engine is in this aircraft and is it better than the Centaurus?

  • @pascalchauvet4230
    @pascalchauvet4230 7 років тому

    Is it indeed a R-3350 Wright engine? The cowling looks pretty much like the original one, I wouldn't have thought the Wright engine with all its valve rocker gear would fit in it

  • @RichardGoth
    @RichardGoth 10 років тому +1

    Hawker Fury VH-ORN, C/N37534. Built 1948 and sold to Iraq. Exported to the USA in 1979 and then exported to Australia
    Theres a good article in Australian Flying on this machine

  • @ryankc3631
    @ryankc3631 7 років тому +7

    Wish he'd shut his moufenhagen so I can hear that glorious engine.

  • @neerdun
    @neerdun 11 років тому +1

    I have seen the sea fury display live and it was an incredible performance. There are so many aircraft I would love to see flying again in my lifetime. Here is the list.
    Me109
    ME110
    HE111
    JU87(Stukka)
    FW190
    Dornier 239? Tri motor
    And from Japan the Mitsubishi zero.
    All deserve a place in our history.

    • @kenjohan
      @kenjohan 11 років тому

      You´ll never see a "Me109" fly as there is no such aircraft. But there are several Bf 109 airworthy.

    • @kenjohan
      @kenjohan 10 років тому

      Do you, really? Everybody´s got a "Poephol." Even you my friend.

    • @sonerbihan
      @sonerbihan 10 років тому

      Ken J.
      Sorry, but ME 109 only means Messerchmitt 109, or M-E ONE O NINE, as commonly used by the allied forces pilots, the BF letters symbol are the first ones of the Bayericshe Flugzeugwerk, of which the headquarters were and still are in Augsburg in Bavaria, southern Germany

    • @billfarley9167
      @billfarley9167 Рік тому

      In the 1990's Whitehorse, Yukon celebrated the 50th anniversary of the completion of the Alaska Highway. Besides having many military vehicles and aircraft representing that era, an American flew in with a Japanese Zero and gave quite a display during the airshow.

  • @pobinr
    @pobinr 8 років тому +10

    Shame someone has to spoil the incredible sound by talking over this through the tannoy

    • @sparkyshadows
      @sparkyshadows 5 років тому +1

      Yeh what a gobby dick head spoilt the whole show so I turned it off

  • @Manintoga
    @Manintoga 10 років тому +6

    Hawker's new innovation: the epileptic-drive, a continued development from the infamous parkinson-drive. Instead of inefficiently rotating a rigid set of propeller blades, the epileptic-drive shakes elastic blades back and forth lazily, producing massive thrust at high efficiency.

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 10 років тому +1

      Ho, ho.

    • @Manintoga
      @Manintoga 10 років тому +1

      TheThirdMan That was ten years ago and i only did it 5 tim-I only did it for tenfifteentimes.

    • @fudgepanda1
      @fudgepanda1 10 років тому

      Manintoga I....er....fell for that.....sort of. I think

    • @rollsroycemerlin4321
      @rollsroycemerlin4321 10 років тому +6

      Ah yes, replacing the less reliable tourettes-drive that could produce short bursts of power but unpredictably.

  • @iskandartaib
    @iskandartaib 4 роки тому

    So how did this Sea Fury end up with a R-3350? First thing I noticed was the prop.

  • @Dave5843-d9m
    @Dave5843-d9m 2 роки тому

    Peak of the SuperProps.

  • @benters3509
    @benters3509 7 років тому

    Funnily enough, my first thought was that is sounded and looked like a Centaurus on startup. With all that smoke and all. But the 4 bladed prop would mean it had a Wright motor in it I think.

  • @billfarley9167
    @billfarley9167 Рік тому

    It's ironic that this is a German air show. What the tourists probably don't realize is that this fighter would have met the Luftwaffe and decimated it, but the war was over before it became operational. The Grumman F9F Bearcat was the closest fighter to match the Sea Fury.

    • @PulsoJango
      @PulsoJango  Рік тому

      And then the german luftwaffe used the sea fury later!

  • @chopperking1122
    @chopperking1122 11 років тому

    the ultimate development of the typhoon...

  • @Xantec
    @Xantec 11 років тому

    1:42, that whistle as the plane passes overhead....
    enjoy the Centaurus Symphony Orchestra!!!!

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 років тому +1

      This plane DOES NOT have the Centaurus engine...it has a Wright R3350 engine....a USA made engine, of WW II vintage....BOEING B29....

    • @tomsomerfield
      @tomsomerfield 10 років тому +1

      Wilbur is right. It's a shame as well as the Centaurus sounds so much better than the one is this video

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 років тому +1

      Tom But you have to admit it is better to hear the sound of the Wright flying it than NO sound.....

    • @tomsomerfield
      @tomsomerfield 10 років тому +1

      Definetly who wouldn't want to see this beauty up and running??

  • @michaelmcguire5155
    @michaelmcguire5155 7 років тому

    What happened to the 5th prop blade?

  • @stevelewis7263
    @stevelewis7263 6 років тому +3

    Imagine if this plane had been in service at the time of the Battle of Britain

    • @bamboosa
      @bamboosa 5 років тому

      You would probably need more than one Seafury in 1940.

    • @monzy-
      @monzy- 4 роки тому

      It would destroy everything in its way most likely, wouldnt be fair at all on the Germans

    • @peterh1965oz
      @peterh1965oz 4 роки тому +2

      If you are going to change the timelines then it would be flying against ME262s during the Battle of Britain then....

    • @stevelewis7263
      @stevelewis7263 4 роки тому

      @@peterh1965oz Not as fast as a Me 262 but vastly more nimble with a better rate of acceleration

    • @dennisroyhall121
      @dennisroyhall121 3 роки тому

      It certainly would have made a fast meal of the muderously slimy and cowardly Stukas and I’d have been proud to be the first to cheer! The Stuka was the German ‘plane that so typified the Nazi régime in manner....ie the cowardly bully.

  • @Lucaf104
    @Lucaf104 11 років тому +1

    This plane is fitted with a Pw2800, anybody know who was the pilot..?!

  • @PulsoJango
    @PulsoJango  11 років тому +1

    It´s flown by Patrice Marchasson

  • @oceanhome2023
    @oceanhome2023 6 років тому

    WOW !!!!

  • @benters3509
    @benters3509 7 років тому +1

    Nope. Didn't sound like a Centaurus once in the air. The Bristol engine had a very distinct whistle to it in a low flypast.

  • @davidmarshall1259
    @davidmarshall1259 7 років тому +1

    that's a seriously impressive airplane, a hurricane on steroids. I bet its wonderful to fly, these pilots are a lucky bunch aren't they??

  • @psykat9816
    @psykat9816 8 років тому +1

    is the sea fury modeled on the typhoon or tempest?

    • @davidmarshall1259
      @davidmarshall1259 7 років тому +3

      I like people who know stuff like this, thank you.

    • @colinmartin2921
      @colinmartin2921 3 роки тому

      It is a development of the radial engined Tempest.

  • @ericgoujon
    @ericgoujon 5 років тому

    Yes...

  • @lucascarvalho2464
    @lucascarvalho2464 10 років тому +1

    Que som de motor lindo!!!

  • @Shelby-Ecoboost-Raptor-550hp
    @Shelby-Ecoboost-Raptor-550hp 3 роки тому

    *The Hawker Sea Fury didn't even go into Service until Aug 1947*

  • @SommerAdric
    @SommerAdric 11 років тому +1

    was this originally an Australian Navy aircraft or was it painted like that?????

    • @Clebbsi
      @Clebbsi 11 років тому +3

      well it was probably used in the australian navy aswell but I'm quite sure it's originally british

    • @SommerAdric
      @SommerAdric 11 років тому +3

      Cnuggat Did some digging and found this:
      This was VH-HFX an ex-Iraqi Fury FB.10 c/n 37534
      Exported to UK 1991 as G-BTTA
      Returned to Australia as VH-ORN in 2011
      The correct original aircraft with these original markings is now in USA. Aircraft is highly modified for air racing and flies as "Furias".
      Owned by Bill Rogers and Dale Stolzer of "Everett" Washington USA.

    • @martinholt3082
      @martinholt3082 11 років тому

      Adric Sommer Well done! Thanks for doing some 'spade work'. Very interesting to hear the history of this aircraft. Are you an aviation enthusiast?
      Best regards, Mart.

    • @SommerAdric
      @SommerAdric 11 років тому

      Yes very much so! Highly interested in World War 2 aircraft! They just don't make them like they used to!

    • @martinholt3082
      @martinholt3082 11 років тому

      Adric Sommer Hi...it shows! I am interested in most military aviation but, there is something about these particular aircraft! The idea that, the advent of the jet fighter made all these magnificent prop aircraft obsolete overnight, is such a misnomer! Look forward to reading more of your posts.

  • @haynesfamily7752
    @haynesfamily7752 8 років тому +1

    why is only a four blade prop fitted?

    • @whylie74
      @whylie74 8 років тому +1

      +Haynes Family most likely because it's fitted with a Pratt & Whitney R-2800 and not the original Bristol Centarus

  • @glennmiles5365
    @glennmiles5365 8 років тому +3

    Published on September 11, 2013
    Magnificent display of Hawker Sea Fury Sea on Saturday at Hahnweide 2013. The smoke generator on the wingtips conjure impressive images in the sky, even if it is not clearly visible in the video. I'd rather have me focused when filming on the aircraft, which can be difficult enough. The Hawker Sea Fury is one of the fastest propeller-driven aircraft Jagt, equipped with a Wright R-3350 engine with 2.480PS. The performance has been increased in this racing machine on 2900PS. Just sit back and enjoy!

  • @geoffdearth7360
    @geoffdearth7360 6 років тому

    I saw one of these at Oshkosh.

  • @russwalters6455
    @russwalters6455 10 років тому +4

    correct mr croft a sea fury did shoot down a mig.fury flight from colousus class carrier hms ocean,led by lt.hoagy carmicheal .

    • @mrrolandlawrence
      @mrrolandlawrence 6 років тому

      yeh but as the russian trainers pointed out, the north korean's barely had instructions on how to take off and land. so like beating up a disabled kid, technically its a win... but you know in your heart otherwise. imo though, best prop the uk ever made :) far better than the flimsy spitfire!

  • @ximenoworks
    @ximenoworks 10 років тому

    Hahn Air Base?

  • @mikesalazar3262
    @mikesalazar3262 6 років тому

    Was that James Brown I heard?

  • @fixizin
    @fixizin 11 років тому

    Does the 4-bladed prop mean it's an earlier version, and 5-bladed prop came on later models...? Super serious flying machine regardless. Puts me in the mood for a bit of strafing... for sport. ;')

    • @j.cm.629
      @j.cm.629 11 років тому +3

      TykeLad101
      exactly. It has a Wright engine, like the Reno racer Fury. NO OTHER engine in the world can or could ever produce - or even "mimic" the marvelous Bristol Centaurus engine sound. The original Fury has the Centaurus engine and 5-bladed prop

    • @fixizin
      @fixizin 11 років тому

      j.c M. So I take it the Centaurus is not as logistically viable/available in the present day as the Wright? Still, no mean feat keeping a WW2 era bird airworthy. Even harder to sneak the multiple auto-cannons past duh authori-tahs! :D

    • @martinholt3082
      @martinholt3082 11 років тому

      j.c M. Hi, good stuff! But I still prefer the Merlin!

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 11 років тому

      Ian Sinclair The Centaurus engine was not that good of an engine, thats why most were swapped out for PW or Wrights. And the Brits say the USA could not build a decent engine, both the above mentioned engines were head and shoulders above the Centauras

    • @martinholt3082
      @martinholt3082 11 років тому

      TykeLad101 He maybe right, he maybe wrong, you may agree, you might disagree but that does not mean his opinion is 's***e! There's no need to get abusive!

  • @emil_5127
    @emil_5127 11 років тому

    mk.II?

  • @muckiderhase157
    @muckiderhase157 7 років тому

    Wie schreibt man den Namen dieses offenbar französischen Piloten?

  • @minenu11
    @minenu11 11 років тому

    There was an aircraft in Australia for many years painted in this exact scheme. But it had a Bristol Centaurus engine. If this is the same aircraft sad to see the R-3350 installation. If I remember it was originally an Iraqi Fury, not a sea fury. Of course may be a different aircraft but it did go to Europe.

    • @kenjohan
      @kenjohan 11 років тому +1

      Iraqi Fury = Sea Fury used by Iraq.

  • @toadapocalypse9003
    @toadapocalypse9003 7 років тому +5

    I don't speak German but what could all the bilge and drivel from that incessant babbler possibly add to the pure sound of a Bristol Centaurus Mk 18 engine? Don't really understand why these announcers have to always talk over everything. I go to airshows to see and hear the planes, not to hear some bumbler on a pa system. Oh, and that mean sounding whistle when the Sea Fury makes a high speed pass, sounds better than the Corsair.

    • @unit0033
      @unit0033 5 років тому

      @soaringtractor lol

  • @MrTallpoppy58
    @MrTallpoppy58 6 років тому

    Why the red kangaroo ?

  • @ubg43
    @ubg43 10 років тому

    4 bladed prop?

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 років тому

      This Sea Fury does NOT have the original engine, thats why the 4 bladed prop and notice the direction of rotation Probable has the Wright R3350 in it or possible the PW R2800. gotta use a USA built engine to put it in the air....fact

    • @alancollard8252
      @alancollard8252 10 років тому +1

      Wilbur Finnigan wrong , only american air racers use the pratt and whitney motors, all historic flight sea fury,s use the original bristol centaurus which are still being rebuilt by riccardo in england, when the aircraft came out is bristol radial was the most powerfull in the world

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 років тому +1

      Alan Collard YOU are WRONG ! ! this plane DOES NOT have the original engine...notice the 4 blade prop and the direction of rotation ??? Wright R3350...

    • @myZisfantastic
      @myZisfantastic 9 років тому

      Wilbur Finnigan Alan Collard you are wrong as stated by Wilbur Finnigan! Here is a proof if you need one
      www.sandersaircraft.com/restoration_seafury-project.asp

  • @johncrispin2118
    @johncrispin2118 4 роки тому

    Hawker sea fury ? Lovely aircraft but not a sea Fury without a Centaurus engine that it was designed with.

  • @Juno58
    @Juno58 11 років тому +4

    Die Airshow auf der Hahnweide ist immer ein Erlebnis... wäre allerdings besser, wenn der Sprecher weniger quasseln würde. Wäre ja schon schön, wenn er wenigstens seine ständigen Wiederholungen weg lassen würde.
    Diese Sea Fury F-AZXJ wird übrigens nicht von einem Bristol Centaurus angetrieben, sondern von einem Wright R-3350.

    • @PulsoJango
      @PulsoJango  11 років тому +3

      Danke für den Hinweis, hab die Beschreibung geändert.
      Die Sprecher sind unnötig, der eine labert nur schwachsinn und der andere macht ständig Sparwitze vornehmlich über Übergewichtige.

  • @craigpennington1251
    @craigpennington1251 5 років тому +1

    Don't you just hate announcers? They ruin it.

  • @andysolution62
    @andysolution62 7 років тому

    schade um die vertane Chance, diese FW-190 Kopie englischer Produktion beim Publikum erklärend zu präsentieren....

  • @minenu11
    @minenu11 11 років тому +8

    The Centaurus sounds better.

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 років тому +1

      BUT The Wright R3350 is IN the Plane and it is flying.........

    • @minenu11
      @minenu11 10 років тому +2

      true

    • @exb.r.buckeyeman845
      @exb.r.buckeyeman845 4 роки тому

      Steve Lovett Unfortunately Steve, the Bristol built Centaurus is very rare now, so expensive to maintain, and there’s no one left who knows how to rebuild them anyway. Shame, sleeve valve masterpiece.

  • @PhantomUAV
    @PhantomUAV 7 років тому

    The engine is NOT a Wright engine it is a Bristol Centaurus radial!

    • @TheAmpair
      @TheAmpair 5 років тому

      That engine was running, so most unlikely to be a Centaurus which tend to exist mainly in maintenance facilities where they graze happily on any currency available.

  • @chrisscott2498
    @chrisscott2498 6 років тому +1

    Yet another otherwise majestic display ruined by needless commentary.

  • @chasyes1
    @chasyes1 10 років тому +1

    It's a shame the Sea Fury was a little too late for WW II it could have made a big difference if it was available earlier.. great plane did yoman service in the Korean War largely forgotten today.

    • @barrierodliffe4155
      @barrierodliffe4155 7 років тому

      The Spitfire and Tempest did rather well against German fighters,

  • @hughgordon9527
    @hughgordon9527 6 років тому

    Not been near a rn squadron for a while... No ball and chain on the too😈😈😈😈

  • @tomsomerfield
    @tomsomerfield 9 років тому +50

    Wondered why it sounded so shabby but then I realised its that horrible wright engine instead of the glorious Bristol Centaurus... Such a pity.

    • @gowron277a
      @gowron277a 9 років тому +2

      Tom Somerfield Well, it was obviously a better choice or they would not have used it and their is alot more wright's still flying than bristols.

    • @tomsomerfield
      @tomsomerfield 9 років тому +11

      ***** because the Centaurus is much more technically advanced and difficult to maintain. the wright is the easier option for the sake of a display aircraft.

    • @gowron277a
      @gowron277a 9 років тому

      It was a sleeve valve engine correct? Then that would explain it. Did the sea fury originaly have the Centaurus? Can't even remember.

    • @tomsomerfield
      @tomsomerfield 9 років тому +10

      ***** yes they had Bristol Centaurus engines. Exceptionally powerful engines for there time.

    • @gowron277a
      @gowron277a 9 років тому +4

      Well I know how you brits like your sleeve valve engines and I cant blame you. Did a little reading on the Centaurus and watched a few videos. They are indeed glorious. But I like the sounds of the Hercules more myself.

  • @GBSainteCluque
    @GBSainteCluque 2 роки тому

    Please no voices just engine sound!

  • @tilmannluhning9235
    @tilmannluhning9235 11 років тому

    This sound

  • @SiliPlays
    @SiliPlays 11 років тому

    Erinnert mich von ein bisschen weiter weg irgendwie an eine F8F

  • @bugattieb110ss
    @bugattieb110ss 8 років тому +7

    The Sea Fury had a Bristol Centuras 18 cylinder radial engine which had nothing to do with the any Yank radial engine of that era. please ammend your incorrect description. Bloody cheek!

  • @volkerjanssen7905
    @volkerjanssen7905 7 років тому

    Einer der härtesten Jobs der Welt: Rumlabern auf Flugtagen. Ich sag nur "Schwermetall" :-)

  • @0nem1leh1gh
    @0nem1leh1gh 10 років тому +16

    Der "Stadionsprecher" nervt.

    • @Herr_Jehmineh
      @Herr_Jehmineh 7 років тому +1

      0nem1leh1gh ohne Witz, was für ein Gelaber.

    • @juliacarter5321
      @juliacarter5321 7 років тому +1

      0nem1leh1gh a

    • @andysolution62
      @andysolution62 7 років тому

      er KRINGELT sich so durch´s Gelabere...::::)))))

  • @Warbirds
    @Warbirds 8 років тому

    The Red Kangaroo !

  • @horse54a
    @horse54a 9 років тому

    I think it was it used to be the bEARCat if not they are neck and neck.

  • @yogibearthebear6774
    @yogibearthebear6774 8 років тому

    what are u doing torchering our australian sea fury :)

  • @toucan65
    @toucan65 11 років тому

    Sounds more like a Centaurus to me. Don't think it's an R-3350

    • @fudgepanda1
      @fudgepanda1 10 років тому

      My Dad was on Sunderland flying boats in Malaya and Korea from 1948 until 1955 and they had Twin Wasps, possibly R1830s. Don't really know why I told you that...........

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 років тому +1

      READ THE DAMN TITLE and listen to the video....engine is the Wright R3350 ! ! !

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 років тому

      18tangles The Twin Wasps were AVAILABLE and made more horspower and were reliable...same/similar engine as B24 Liberator used...another British plane that needed an American engine...For the US engines being "Junk" the Brits sure used a lot of them......

  • @Firstade01
    @Firstade01 11 років тому +1

    Bristol Centaurus Motor klingt besser

  • @alloypony01
    @alloypony01 10 років тому

    Blathering on &on,&on... No TALK , please !

  • @markpark9539
    @markpark9539 10 років тому

    funny the commentator had to use english words nice plane, still not quite a p- 40 though

    • @dougbright8120
      @dougbright8120 9 років тому

      mark park Huh? I love the P-40 and it was tough as nails, but it was a much older generation of aircraft than the HSF and not remotely in the same league in terms of performance, payload, range, speed, ceiling or almost any other parameter I can think of. :-)

    • @markpark9539
      @markpark9539 9 років тому

      Doug Bright Bright yet it was there when needed. the sea fury was a side note.

    • @TheKusa5
      @TheKusa5 9 років тому

      mark park Are you kidding? this could rip a P-40 too shreds

    • @markpark9539
      @markpark9539 9 років тому

      Zee Kusa thats like saying a f15 could rip to shreds a mig 23. different generations. the sea fury didnt show up till 1945, the p40 was and updated 1930's design. im sure the f4u would be an equal match, ( also an earlier design). it would be interesting to see a dogfight between a bearcat and sea fury

    • @TheKusa5
      @TheKusa5 9 років тому

      Mmm a bearcat would be much MUCH more equal too the sea fury

  • @mickkennedy1344
    @mickkennedy1344 9 років тому +1

    Fury with a Chevy V8 in it -- not a Centaurus.

  • @bamboosa
    @bamboosa 5 років тому

    Is that 1970s funk I hear? Sometimes I love the Germans (or wherever this is - I'm not googlin').

  • @petemason3336
    @petemason3336 7 років тому

    Dunno about my piston engine favouirtes. this or an F4U Corsair. Fill your boots arguing.