5:15 What difference? It's like saying if your notion of truth is identical to mine then you can't not call true what I do. Absurd. Simply privileges one stereotypical familiar 'reality'. Why don't they just admit the conditionality of their notion of truth? Zealots.
Muddling round in the soup of basic concepts like 'right', 'true' 'knowledge' etc. There is something flawed in the basic building materials, which makes it impossible to build a meaningful construction. - Dogmatic, closed, unenlightened, circular. If you can't stick it on a bumper sticker, it's not worth knowing.
Indeed, Philosophers hate it when people say "that's true for you, but not for me"... thank you so much, Peter.
I wish there was some sort of picture-in-picture running along with this that showed the slides play in the back ground.
5:15 What difference? It's like saying if your notion of truth is identical to mine then you can't not call true what I do. Absurd. Simply privileges one stereotypical familiar 'reality'. Why don't they just admit the conditionality of their notion of truth? Zealots.
Muddling round in the soup of basic concepts like 'right', 'true' 'knowledge' etc. There is something flawed in the basic building materials, which makes it impossible to build a meaningful construction. - Dogmatic, closed, unenlightened, circular.
If you can't stick it on a bumper sticker, it's not worth knowing.
@selfincurred Derp.