This concerto begins like the 4th of Beethoven. The theme is sketched at the piano, then fully exposed by the orchestra at its full intensity. The following is different, since the piano comes back after this orchestral exposition. The construction is specially solid. The interventions of the orchestra help defining the overall form. They contain dlelicious details of orchestration. As a whole, the concerto is a masterwork which would deserve to be played in our symphonic concerts.
Reinecke, Moszkowski, Bortkievicz, Wienawski, Paderewski, Beach have all written first rate piano concerti that are worth incorporating in the performance repertoire.
Too bad we're still coughing up Chopin's blood and celebrating the questionable genius of either, Prokofiev, or Rachmaninov. I am disappointed with every new season of my city's symphony orchestra (supposedly one of the world's best), and how they program... again and again and again... the same old shit. I mean this in no offensive way, but I can't wait for these septuagenarian benefactors to die already so that new music can be played by these incredible orchestras, whose musicians' talents (and their paychecks) are being wasted on yet another performance of Prokofiev's 2nd piano concerto, Tchaikovsky's 6th, Mahler's 1st, Shostakovich's 10th, Beethoven's 3rd or 5th symphonies, etc etc etc...
@@ulengrau6357 Yours is the same boring, droning, immature argument that's been around (to my ears) since the 60's. what happened. The NY Philharmonic brought in Pierre Boulez and it almost destroyed them. When you grow up, you'll understand.
Yes .i am agree with this opinion .the theme IS exposed for the beginning at the end .glorious concerto as the violon ans cello concertos .G od bless Reinecke
Not really a common and romantic piano concerto but an authentic , original and majestic as you vrote concerto for piano . The beginning surprise always me : spiritual .The second part IS a sort of choral ....so beautifull written . The pianist as the orchestra IS marvellous .(excuse me ,'am a french jew not at all anglo saxon or english man )
I spent most of my life playing in symphony orchestra. Never played this huge , marvelous work. In truth, most pianists would find the effort to master this monumental concerto too daunting, when orchestra managers would probably poo-poo it because the audience has never heard of Reinecke. Give them another "Emperor" or Rachmaninoff no 2. Over and over....
I'm ok with you .I was cellist : same thing : Dvorak 1000 times and for The marvellous Davidoff 'concertos .Top hard and who Know among The gota and The officiels Karl Davidoff and his 4 wonderfull concertos ? They are playing NOW with others endlich .They are a summum of The cello répertoire . Cordialement of France
Hello too Do majeur is not a typic romantical ton , the Thema is beautifull without excentricity but the way which the orchestra Come After then go on + strong and + fast ist impressive and a real surprise .a lot of beautifull things as the oboe 's sound and otjers interventions , the greats tuttis ,the échanges with the soloist who use frequently the pédale employed . all theses things are doing that this Reinecke 3 concerto is one of the best piano concerto never composed .excuse- me i am not anglophone but i Hope that we inderstand my feeling . Idem for the second mvt .great pleasure an emotions .Roger Korciaa
Perusal of the score at IMSLP reveals that the tempo of the finale is alternately titled Allegro vivace e grazioso and that there is an alternate, forte ending to the opening Allegro.
Yes ulen grau : one of the best piano orchestra For you i recommende especelly Boulez sonatine piano or bartok or Stravinsky or also Stravinsky if you like la merde .I believe you casse couille and prétentious But pécials mentions for Charles Reineke ,Max Bruck or Wienasky. Proot proot
The opening measure of the second movement (16:22) seems almost a quotation from the theme in the 2nd movement of Schubert's D 934 (ua-cam.com/video/4fskKDq9bgw/v-deo.html ), so thereby "Sei mir gegrüsst" too.
For me this is the best Piano Concerto that was composed by Reinecke
Poor Carl is never played on our two local classical music radio stations. Thank you for uploading these neglected treasures.
Instablaster
This concerto begins like the 4th of Beethoven. The theme is sketched at the piano, then fully exposed by the orchestra at its full intensity. The following is different, since the piano comes back after this orchestral exposition. The construction is specially solid. The interventions of the orchestra help defining the overall form. They contain dlelicious details of orchestration. As a whole, the concerto is a masterwork which would deserve to be played in our symphonic concerts.
Reinecke wrote 3 symphonies and 8 total concerto for solo & orch. and all 11 works are equally great! He was just a very tasteful, complete musician!
Reinecke, Moszkowski, Bortkievicz, Wienawski, Paderewski, Beach have all written first rate piano concerti that are worth incorporating in the performance repertoire.
Too bad we're still coughing up Chopin's blood and celebrating the questionable genius of either, Prokofiev, or Rachmaninov. I am disappointed with every new season of my city's symphony orchestra (supposedly one of the world's best), and how they program... again and again and again... the same old shit. I mean this in no offensive way, but I can't wait for these septuagenarian benefactors to die already so that new music can be played by these incredible orchestras, whose musicians' talents (and their paychecks) are being wasted on yet another performance of Prokofiev's 2nd piano concerto, Tchaikovsky's 6th, Mahler's 1st, Shostakovich's 10th, Beethoven's 3rd or 5th symphonies, etc etc etc...
Too angry, simplistic.
Did Wienawski wrote Piano Concerto, I only know that he only wrote Violin Concerto, because he's a violinist
@@ulengrau6357 Yours is the same boring, droning, immature argument that's been around (to my ears) since the 60's. what happened. The NY Philharmonic brought in Pierre Boulez and it almost destroyed them.
When you grow up, you'll understand.
@Ignace Erauw It must be hell for you.
A delightful piano concerto. Reinecke did well in the form.
This piano concerto is not just the best out of the four Reinecke wrote, but also has to be one of the finest concertos ever written.
No. It probably depends on how long your lists are. I can think of quite a few I would put ahead of it.
Yes .i am agree with this opinion .the theme IS exposed for the beginning at the end .glorious concerto as the violon ans cello concertos .G od bless Reinecke
Grand, majestic with sweeping runs and lush harmonies.
Not really a common and romantic piano concerto but an authentic , original and majestic as you vrote concerto for piano . The beginning surprise always me : spiritual .The second part IS a sort of choral ....so beautifull written . The pianist as the orchestra IS marvellous .(excuse me ,'am a french jew not at all anglo saxon or english man )
I spent most of my life playing in symphony orchestra. Never played this huge , marvelous work. In truth, most pianists would find the effort to master this monumental concerto too daunting, when orchestra managers would probably poo-poo it because the audience has never heard of Reinecke. Give them another "Emperor" or Rachmaninoff no 2. Over and over....
I think also that .The first is The best , The first mvt is glorious . Cordialement de France
I'm ok with you .I was cellist : same thing : Dvorak 1000 times and for The marvellous Davidoff 'concertos .Top hard and who Know among The gota and The officiels Karl Davidoff and his 4 wonderfull concertos ? They are playing NOW with others endlich .They are a summum of The cello répertoire . Cordialement of France
Start times:.. 1. Allegro
(00:00) -- 2. Largo (16:22) -- 3. Finale. Molto vivace e grazioso (25:18)
Magnifique 8:50, 18:50..mélodieux. J'ai vraiment aimé 🎶💓🎶
Bravo bravo bravo brilliance music concerto super
DA
Wonderful music! Deliciously Romantic!
Yes . I am agree with you .The first mouvement is wonderfull
Amazing masterpiece of music !
Every thing he learned from Schumann paid off in spades. And bravo, Klaus Hellwig!
Questo concerto mostra una trovata maturità
artistica e pienamente
romantico.
Un Reinecke ispirato.
Ottimo post e un saluto
a Bartje.
This is absolutely brilliant! A marvellous composition! Thank you for introducing me to it.
Hello too
Do majeur is not a typic romantical ton , the Thema is beautifull without excentricity but the way which the orchestra Come After then go on + strong and + fast ist impressive and a real surprise .a lot of beautifull things as the oboe 's sound and otjers interventions , the greats tuttis ,the échanges with the soloist who use frequently the pédale employed . all theses things are doing that this Reinecke 3 concerto is one of the best piano concerto never composed .excuse- me i am not anglophone but i Hope that we inderstand my feeling . Idem for the second mvt .great pleasure an emotions .Roger Korciaa
Perusal of the score at IMSLP reveals that the tempo of the finale is alternately titled Allegro vivace e grazioso and that there is an alternate, forte ending to the opening Allegro.
Oh wow... a video without dislikes. This must be one of the really, really, really good ones.
EDIT: After listening. It is.
Ulen Grau -- Good point....It must be LISTENED to first......
Now there are two...sadly
Yes ulen grau : one of the best piano orchestra
For you i recommende especelly Boulez sonatine piano or bartok or Stravinsky or also Stravinsky if you like la merde .I believe you casse couille and prétentious But pécials mentions for Charles Reineke ,Max Bruck or Wienasky. Proot proot
Now there are none … happily
The opening measure of the second movement (16:22) seems almost a quotation from the theme in the 2nd movement of Schubert's D 934 (ua-cam.com/video/4fskKDq9bgw/v-deo.html ), so thereby "Sei mir gegrüsst" too.
He looks similar to Cesar Franck!
And Xaver Scharwenka))
30:00
4:20
for me it's too kliklikliklikliklikllikli....and the melody is lost after 3 minutes. Sorry, no.