The Race to Build the World’s Fastest Supercomputers | WSJ U.S. vs. China

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 сер 2022
  • The U.S. supercomputer Frontier was crowned the world’s speediest this year, but some computer scientists say China‘s Tianhe-3 may be as fast. WSJ unpacks the tech and design of the machines as the two countries race to solve some of the world’s biggest challenges.
    Photo illustration: Sharon Shi
    U.S. vs. China
    This original video series explores the rivalry between the two superpowers’ competing efforts to develop the technologies that are reshaping our world.
    More from the Wall Street Journal:
    Visit WSJ.com: www.wsj.com
    Visit the WSJ Video Center: wsj.com/video
    On Facebook: / videos
    On Twitter: / wsj
    On Snapchat: on.wsj.com/2ratjSM
    #Supercomputers #China #WSJ

КОМЕНТАРІ • 557

  • @adonisvan4328
    @adonisvan4328 Рік тому +331

    Let these two compete in tech race that can benefit the human race, not an army race that can destroy humanity

    • @mikelbrenn111
      @mikelbrenn111 Рік тому

      Wrong this supercomputer/AI will be used to get an edge in economics and military advancement. This will be the new nuclear weapon. If the people who controls the technology are dominant then chances are, they will use this to expand their agenda.

    • @letsburn00
      @letsburn00 Рік тому +24

      Unless they use it to build a homicidal AI.
      Which I wish was entirely a joke.

    • @pencilandpaper4516
      @pencilandpaper4516 Рік тому +1

      *What WSJ will not tell you is that China have not released their latest data for the last five years (which is deemed as classified as not worthy of frivolous "race" it is well known in Chinese internet Guess English speaking western people still have yet caught up :) ) that is why America machines were able to "catch up"*
      By the way, American installed chip ban and sanctions on Chinese companies working on supercomputing since early 2000s and space station since 1980s

    • @TG-nx7xe
      @TG-nx7xe Рік тому +17

      cannot be achieved if one thinks the competition is to deter or even suffocate the other.

    • @ibbeubbe1894
      @ibbeubbe1894 Рік тому +4

      ​@@TG-nx7xe you do realise competition is why you have smartphone or laptop.

  • @capitalwinnie9820
    @capitalwinnie9820 Рік тому +100

    the first computer was the size of a house imagine what this would look like in 20 years lol

    • @moteq6598
      @moteq6598 Рік тому +24

      I wouldn't be surprised if the size only increased linearly but the computation increased exponentially.

    • @blokin5039
      @blokin5039 Рік тому

      Hahahaha Lol HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOL LOL LOL LOL haha hahahaha! !!!!!!

    • @alpotato6531
      @alpotato6531 Рік тому +4

      moores law bye bye ):

  • @MYLITTLEPWNY97
    @MYLITTLEPWNY97 Рік тому +49

    "the compute node is basically like your personal computer"
    Pulls out my PC with 8 GPUS and 2 CPUS

    • @kaptenhiu5623
      @kaptenhiu5623 Рік тому +2

      Exactly! just like my personal computer ... 20 years from now! I hope.

  • @havencat9337
    @havencat9337 Рік тому +72

    And...how do you expect them to reveal what they do if they are blocked continuously whenever they make any small progress?

    • @iLink8
      @iLink8 Рік тому +3

      If they want to play it close to the chest, that's fine. But don't claim the world's fastest supercomputer and then show us a pathetic blade with years old 8gig sticks of RAM...

    • @gamba4605
      @gamba4605 Рік тому

      @@iLink8 hahaha good

    • @WalkOverHotCoal
      @WalkOverHotCoal Рік тому +4

      @@iLink8 I think you thought too highly of Chinese technology. The last I heard about it, they are salvaging chips from all sorts of devices with chip such as Apple II, Sinclair ZX81, Nintado, GamBoy, etc. So what you said is rather exaggerated. China still has decades to catch up to the US. So there is no need to worry about it.

    • @wli2718
      @wli2718 Рік тому

      i m sure if their scientists drink coffee at Starbucks, the US gov't would ban Starbucks from selling anything that contains water to the Chinese government.

    • @bestquotes2765
      @bestquotes2765 Рік тому

      Soon the US gonna get backfire for that

  • @eggman105
    @eggman105 Рік тому +101

    The chips in those computers are not at all "tiny." The Radeon Instinct MI250X GPUs in Frontier have a die size of 1540 mm^2.

  • @TheMrFishnDucks
    @TheMrFishnDucks Рік тому +6

    Very informative video. Keep up the good work.

  • @tonysu8860
    @tonysu8860 Рік тому +62

    Although it might be interesting how the Tianhe 3 might perform,
    I'm at least as interested in the SUNWAY TAIHULIGHT which although was #1 when it was first submitted in 2016, is still ranked #6 in the June 2022 Top 500 report that was recently published.
    Unlike the Tianhe 2A which is still ranked #9 on the same list, the SUNWAY seems to be built entirely with domestic and proprietary chips, accelerators and interconnects. This machine might be a better indication of China's computing capability because it might be using 100% domestic technology while the Tianh3 2A is built using Intel Xeon chips, Chinese accelerators and interconnects.

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 Рік тому +3

      Chinese do not have any GPUs inside their domestically made supercomputers

    • @catonpillow
      @catonpillow Рік тому +8

      @@napobg6842 Wrong. You can easily find Сhinese made GPU compute engines. And they developed them in only three years. Maybe that's why you've missed it.

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 Рік тому +2

      @@catonpillow There are some but they are so weak that there is no need to even consider them

    • @catonpillow
      @catonpillow Рік тому +7

      @@napobg6842 Wrong again. The chiplets made by Biren Technology(A Сhinese GPU firm) are comparable with Nvidia's Ampere flagship.

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 Рік тому +2

      @@catonpillow They are not even remotely close to Ampere GPUs 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @CengalLut
    @CengalLut Рік тому +147

    Americans blocked Chinese access to the best chips, then act surprised when Chinese researchers stop collaborating with them on computing research.

    • @fannyalbi9040
      @fannyalbi9040 Рік тому +28

      yup, those classic self righteous cxxt’s entitlement

    • @mitchfukncanfield
      @mitchfukncanfield Рік тому +1

      Yeah , but why did America block them ?

    • @antoniowang3392
      @antoniowang3392 Рік тому

      @@mitchfukncanfield to try slowdown/hurt china research speed technology on respond of rising tension after Pelosi visit over Taiwan

    • @shawnz3307
      @shawnz3307 Рік тому +1

      @@mitchfukncanfield idk, same reason that America wants collab afterward?

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 Рік тому

      Nobody acts surprise. The US wants China to use domestic chips as they will surely know the Chinese supercomputers are inferior to the American ones

  • @phlprinting
    @phlprinting Рік тому +20

    china already has the fastest computer

    • @tdn4773
      @tdn4773 Рік тому +1

      Perhaps. Too bad for the world community that China is not more transparent about such things.

  • @KareforBrenda
    @KareforBrenda Рік тому +1

    This is awesome 👏🏿

  • @sohailvlogt
    @sohailvlogt Рік тому +13

    WSJ make video on Quantum computing china vs US.
    China world leader in Quantum computing.

  • @egzain05
    @egzain05 3 місяці тому +1

    Both Countries Are Doing Great... Keep it Up ❤

  • @masterzen107
    @masterzen107 Рік тому +57

    Scary thing is the first fully operational quantum computer will blow this out of the water. which if used to crack our strongest encryption algorithms today, would be easy work for it.

    • @Cris_the_coder
      @Cris_the_coder Рік тому +2

      That's what everybody's really worried about to be honest

    • @Cris_the_coder
      @Cris_the_coder Рік тому +2

      It will be able to crack encryptions we thought were impossible

    • @zinjanthropus322
      @zinjanthropus322 Рік тому +9

      Quantum computers don't work how you think, they may be able to ease certain computations but they are not going to replace conventional computers.

    • @masterzen107
      @masterzen107 Рік тому +4

      @@zinjanthropus322 a QC would be crazy overkill for conventional tasks like email or word. the essence of encryptions are nothing more than very complex equations, a QC will be able to crack that mathematical formula AKA algorithm AKA computations relatively easily.

    • @zinjanthropus322
      @zinjanthropus322 Рік тому +4

      @@masterzen107 What I'm saying is calculations to do with a specific type of encryption are the only things quantum computers are known to be better at than conventional computers. In fact a new encryption standard is already being rolled out on conventional computers that quantum computers can't crack.

  • @stjojokaras9363
    @stjojokaras9363 Рік тому +15

    I think Japan is also competing in this race.

    • @iLink8
      @iLink8 Рік тому +7

      Correct, Frontier replaced them at the #1 spot.

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 Рік тому

      BS, JAPAN is far behind china and USA, also japanese use US technology, its not japanese supercomputer, from chips and system, so called japan supercomputer are all US made

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 Рік тому +1

    Nice video.

  • @Anna__Zheng
    @Anna__Zheng Рік тому +1

    how do these computers compare to quantum computers in speed and technology?

  • @matokurin
    @matokurin Рік тому

    Great ,,

  • @devondevon4366
    @devondevon4366 Рік тому +74

    One of the US advantages is that it has a lot of talent born abroad, such as 4:09 Thomas Zacharia, director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. He was born in India and has obtained a Ph.D. in Computational Material Science.
    PS
    According to a 2017 study, 81% of students enrolled in Electrical Engineering in US grad schools were international students. At Yale University, 88% in Electrical Engineering were international students, while 81% in computer science were.
    At Dartmouth, 89% of students enrolled in its graduate computer science program were international students. At NYU- Tandon School of Engineering, 92% of the graduate computer science students were international students.
    PS This doesn't include permanent residents or naturalized citizens; hence the percentage would be higher for those born abroad.

    • @Kiki-en9vm
      @Kiki-en9vm Рік тому

      Nonsense, for the fact that the U.S gives others chance that they never get from others doesn't mean that they do not have their own quality home grown scientists, your kind of talks is what makes racist become even more racist to outsider, your comment is a total nonsense,now the U.S had opened their door to others to come and do their research, something India or China can never do, I respect the Americans honestly,cos many countries if they are like America will hide everything , and will refuse to share ,like the zchinese are doing,the reason why the U.s is cutting off ,the open door policy towards them,cos the Chinese are m3an and unkind.

    • @nmew6926
      @nmew6926 Рік тому

      So its the interest of US to keep India and other countries poor so that brain drain continue.. If you consider the post WW2 immigrants as foreigners, then the percentage is 99%

    • @wenling3487
      @wenling3487 Рік тому

      It’s an advantage, but also disadvantage: USA with a population of over 300 million, couldn’t produce enough talents from its own population.
      Now USA starts to have problems to accept new immigrants, even legal ones.

    • @Western_Decline
      @Western_Decline Рік тому

      US strongest weapon is sanctions. It can be completely unprincipled and use them unilaterally for no reason other to hurt progress.

    • @michaellim4165
      @michaellim4165 Рік тому +12

      Too bad many of them go back to their own countries and compete with competitors in the US.

  • @Hojadurdy
    @Hojadurdy Рік тому +9

    But which one can run Crysis better?

  • @binmo1984
    @binmo1984 Рік тому +7

    USA is sanctioning every competitors so China decided to quit the game. Now USA is number one again. not because you are the fastest. but because China quit the game😹😹😹😹

    • @AwardQueue
      @AwardQueue 20 днів тому

      China quit the game just concerned about the USA's fragile heart.

  • @RebornGalaxy
    @RebornGalaxy Рік тому +3

    very powerful , I heard they can run Cyberpunk 2077 in 30 FPS even..

  • @MegaPapa8888
    @MegaPapa8888 Рік тому +1

    I suspect that nothing can be gained from viewing the Frontier computer structure.

  • @devondevon4366
    @devondevon4366 Рік тому +3

    a tech cold war between the two countries.

  • @zAlaska
    @zAlaska Рік тому +6

    The new cerebras wafer processor is capable of 80 EXO scale speeds. They described this supercomputer as 1 EXO scale. The wafer processor is about 40,000 Watts and this machine is over a million Watts, I believe I put these numbers in correct perspective. This monster supercomputer is already dated. Expect the next generation of machines this size to be terrifyingly fast compared to this slow machine. When I bought my first 486 dx2 computer with a 33 MHz bus operating at 66 MHz in the late '80s I couldn't imagine machines operating at a faster speed. Now I can't imagine such high frequencies, it boggles the mind.

    • @miyagiryota9238
      @miyagiryota9238 11 місяців тому

      Then why is cerebras not built for any supercomputer in any country if its way faster than 1 exascale?

    • @zAlaska
      @zAlaska 11 місяців тому

      Connecting their supercomputing Machine to a legacy machine isn't the problem. Their focus in designing the chip wasn't this be able to put it into any supercomputer that is already out there. The supercomputers that are out there are not equipped to handle the chip and that's not their focus, being able to stick their chip in anybody else's supercomputer. They're building their supercomputers that are more powerful leaving Legacy machines behind. Why doesn't Ferrari build engines for Toyota? How do you put a V12 in a Citroën 2cv? I am clueless to answer your question.

    • @zAlaska
      @zAlaska 11 місяців тому

      @@miyagiryota9238 the speed of their Andromeda computer has 18 zeros.

    • @miyagiryota9238
      @miyagiryota9238 11 місяців тому

      @@zAlaskaif its so fasr then why it not listed even in top 10

  • @_-BikerBoi69_-
    @_-BikerBoi69_- Рік тому +13

    I'd like to play Flight Simulator on that thing

    • @mikelbrenn111
      @mikelbrenn111 Рік тому +7

      Sorry this supercomputer will only do 27 fps on Crysis.

    • @_-BikerBoi69_-
      @_-BikerBoi69_- Рік тому +1

      @@mikelbrenn111 ahh bummer, I'll have to wait for the next super computer to come out then. I require a minimum of 30fps so I can turn on anti aliasing.

  • @geopaulet923
    @geopaulet923 Рік тому

    Let’s go!

  • @yojimbo3681
    @yojimbo3681 Рік тому

    When are we going to have Deep Thought from Hitchhikers?

  • @user-ih4yh9ww2u
    @user-ih4yh9ww2u Рік тому +3

    Look how young Chinese scientists are!

  • @andydondy6444
    @andydondy6444 Рік тому +14

    50 years from now.. Ppl are gonna laugh at the size of those computers.. 😁😁😁

    • @deeplife9654
      @deeplife9654 Рік тому +2

      they laugh at our comment too as we do to see the super computer 50 years ago

    • @blakkwaltz
      @blakkwaltz Рік тому

      Amazing how many people have no clue that moore's law is dead, and computers aren't getting smaller.

    • @deeplife9654
      @deeplife9654 Рік тому

      @@blakkwaltz there is a new technology called Quantum computer.

    • @blakkwaltz
      @blakkwaltz Рік тому

      Quantum computers aren't magic. They will only make some calculations faster. You obviously don't know what you're talking about.

  • @luxuryhub1323
    @luxuryhub1323 Рік тому +61

    I have no idea, what this is about, but it seems gigantic. The effort China puts into new technologies,
    and the advancement they are achieving on a steady pace is amazing. Thank you for showing it to the world.

    • @daharos
      @daharos Рік тому

      lol you mean what China steals? they are nothing but robots without imagination.

    • @morganangel340
      @morganangel340 Рік тому +2

      competition is always good

    • @SparkyOne549
      @SparkyOne549 Рік тому

      The only effort china does putting into technologies, is copying everything from other countries.

    • @jake3551
      @jake3551 Рік тому

      Easy when you aggressively steal technology, research and ip

    • @siramike2654
      @siramike2654 Рік тому

      sanction of China clearly show China is about to surpass USA in technology.

  • @edwinbrace4681
    @edwinbrace4681 Рік тому +13

    Why is the U.S so OBSESSED with CHINA ?

    • @MasterMind171
      @MasterMind171 Рік тому

      @Edwin Brace They are trying to take over the world.

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 Рік тому

      Because China says one of its main goals is to build a military that can crush the USN so that China can do whatever it wants without being bothered with the World Order that among things forbids countries from
      - Forcibly conquering other countries for the purposes of ruling them and taking their resources
      - Blocking shipping lanes by claiming maritime territorial rights beyond 12 miles from shore
      - Raiding fisheries in other countries' protected economic zones
      China wants to overturn the World Order based on International Rule of Law because as China becomes economically, politically and militarily powerful, China sees no reason not to exercise that power to take what it wants anywhere in the world. International Law is the main obstacle to China's ambitions and is doing everything it can to eliminate it. The basis of USA foreign policy is that International Law should govern behavior not whoever can be the biggest bully. The USA is protective of the World Order because it protects the intreest and rights of every country big or small, strong or weak. China benefitted from the World Order when it was weak following WWII but now believes it has every right to take what it wants now that it's stronger.

    • @edwinbrace4681
      @edwinbrace4681 Рік тому +1

      @@tonysu8860 America wants to take the world's resources at free will too ! You do realize the U.S and China need each other to thrive. When one thrives the other thrives. A good example is how the Chinese economy is suffering right now. This has caused supply chain issues in the U.S and prices are going up because of it

  • @ctwatcher
    @ctwatcher Рік тому

    Because they have no air conditioning? Lol. Looks like Denver!

  • @alripal9665
    @alripal9665 20 днів тому

    What are the graphics like?

  • @rdubb77
    @rdubb77 4 місяці тому

    Why would you ever expect a basically closed society to just one day want to collaborate freely (in supercomputing)?

  • @fella9293
    @fella9293 Рік тому +10

    U.s is like my neighbor. They're always jealous with my family and would do everything to make us feel sad

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 Рік тому

      That comment is kinda lame considering China is going above and beyond to steal everything they can.

    • @shiekyerbooti4068
      @shiekyerbooti4068 Рік тому

      做中国人真恶心。

  • @krstoevandrus5937
    @krstoevandrus5937 Рік тому +2

    china: dont tell top500 our speed.

  • @ruochengyin3379
    @ruochengyin3379 Рік тому +4

    I just wonder can I play cyberpunk 2077 smoothly on these computer

  • @elan0054
    @elan0054 Рік тому

    2:54 that's cray cray

  • @deforged
    @deforged Рік тому +2

    but can it play Crysis, tho?

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 Рік тому

    it is the race to get all the silicon and chip making technology with news for wsj in south china sea

  • @jolness1
    @jolness1 Рік тому +40

    One thing to keep in mind is that China will test massive sets of nodes that are not designed to actually be super computers but rather process other sorts of traffic as many smaller scale systems and have them put on the top 500 List. Not that they haven’t made great strides by any means but I do think that is an important qualifier as far as the number of systems

    • @porkch0mp538
      @porkch0mp538 Рік тому

      It sounds like AMD had 7nm fabricated chips for this project. I can't see how China can compete without using a ton of western tech to even enter the convo.

    • @lordlee6473
      @lordlee6473 Рік тому +7

      And your evidence for your claim is?

    • @johnmaris1582
      @johnmaris1582 Рік тому +3

      Can you explain like further. I'm too dumb to understand. Like what is smaller scale that you mentioned?

    • @siramike2654
      @siramike2654 Рік тому

      just keep deceiving yourself. if you are reasonable enough, you should know by now the reason US Sanction China on sell of microchips is due to their competitive edge. they are about to leapfrog USA.

    • @dralgon1752
      @dralgon1752 Рік тому +1

      looks like no one knows what you are saiding

  • @houseofvenusMD
    @houseofvenusMD Рік тому

    Colossus!

  • @billp37abq
    @billp37abq Рік тому

    How many watts/second do supercomputer consume?

    • @blakkwaltz
      @blakkwaltz Рік тому

      It has a peak power draw of 40 megawatts.

    • @billp37abq
      @billp37abq Рік тому

      @@blakkwaltz $79 Celeron n4020 get get same answers as supercomputer? :)

  • @prakashrajput5332
    @prakashrajput5332 Рік тому

    What about India's Param series???

  • @abbasum5271
    @abbasum5271 Рік тому +1

    Love 😘 China Beijing ❤️

  • @derriusdunn-jk3gf
    @derriusdunn-jk3gf Рік тому

    With digital hardware wouldn't you be able to take a solar panel and make a optical transistor then make a digital form of the radio sound to make a optical processor from one transistor or two solar panels that's how I made the Gameboy a supercomputer on the digital side for the future
    Of you ever thought to use solar as the reflection light for holograms you could play the phase of the optical stream of the light the reflection bounce through solar

  • @KieferNguyen
    @KieferNguyen Рік тому +2

    wait if the chinese system didnt participate, you cant say its as fast. let them participate or don't give reverence to it?

  • @chidubemnwaohiri113
    @chidubemnwaohiri113 Рік тому +2

    I've noticed the Global media is obsessed with US and China while ignoring other nations that could become the first in developing commercial quantum computing etc.

    • @ulikemyname6744
      @ulikemyname6744 Рік тому +2

      As of now the US and China are the only 2 nations working to achieve that first. In the US we see the actual work. From China mostly words and claims

    • @rohitsinghyxrs
      @rohitsinghyxrs Рік тому

      Lol US is a failed state now... can't compete so banning everything. This shows how insecure US is

  • @billp37abq
    @billp37abq Рік тому

    We have not forgotten about you 40 MW supercomputer reply.
    Will $79 Lenovo 3 Chromebook Celeron N4020 x86 processor get the same NUMERCAL ANSWERS as supercomputer? Running at ~ 8 W.

  • @Spiniker0056
    @Spiniker0056 Рік тому +2

    … but can they run Crysis?

  • @Asianevermore
    @Asianevermore Рік тому +1

    These are just the ones we know about…

  • @ubaidmuhammad3556
    @ubaidmuhammad3556 Рік тому

    That is why Chinese called dragons.

  • @monoham1
    @monoham1 Рік тому +2

    calling amd by their full name or making out like a compute node is some kind of advanced secret car part shows whoever wrote this has never owned a computer or probably even an xbox

  • @SnakeKonig
    @SnakeKonig Рік тому

    Xinping SuperPC - "yull Bluutooth es Leady to Peal "

  • @grospipo20
    @grospipo20 Рік тому

    This feel like a private part measuring contest who care.... there is diminishing returns at one point.

  • @Ellesar925
    @Ellesar925 Рік тому +16

    Doesn't Japan have the fastest Supercomputer in the world? Or one of the fastest at least. Guess a neutral survey of existing tech would not be belligerent enough.

    • @antoniowang3392
      @antoniowang3392 Рік тому +1

      What is the name of the Japanese supercomputer?

    • @blakkwaltz
      @blakkwaltz Рік тому +1

      Fugaku the Japanese supercomputer is rated at 400 petaflops. This is frontier rated at over 1000 petaflops it's much faster than fugaku.

    • @0xD1CE
      @0xD1CE Рік тому

      They used to dominate back then when they were the few countries that produced their own domestic computers.

    • @Vapor817
      @Vapor817 8 місяців тому +1

      they used to but given how fast microchip advancement happens, it becomes very difficult to hold that spot for long

    • @Ellesar925
      @Ellesar925 8 місяців тому

      @@Vapor817 Yeah, but the WSJ made it a China vs US thing when it'd have been more informative to compare the state of the field at the time the vid was made.

  • @PJRiter1
    @PJRiter1 8 місяців тому

    Can Chinese exaflop computers talk to each other? Are they networked yet?

  • @dariomendoza9136
    @dariomendoza9136 Рік тому

    The real question is
    Can it run Doom?

  • @ronaldrio7950
    @ronaldrio7950 Рік тому

    Can Frontier run Cyberpunk on max settings?

  • @dannhatesusernames
    @dannhatesusernames Рік тому +5

    Everyone who commented before this hadn’t even watched the video yet. It hadn’t been out long enough.

    • @deforged
      @deforged Рік тому

      the video is only 6 minutes long and can be played at a faster speed. maybe you're just slow.

    • @dannhatesusernames
      @dannhatesusernames Рік тому +2

      @@deforged I posted two minutes after release. If you sped it up that quick you didn’t catch the content.

    • @aberba
      @aberba Рік тому

      @@dannhatesusernames exactly 🤣. Why it's not useful to argue on UA-cam

  • @SquizzMe
    @SquizzMe Рік тому

    One wonders how some of these computers don't have consciousness yet.

    • @yaqiwang5242
      @yaqiwang5242 Рік тому

      The architecture of these super computers is actually quite simple so no way near AI so don’t worry.

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 Рік тому

      How do you know that? Have you asked a computer whether it has conscious thoughts?

  • @paulramos9314
    @paulramos9314 Рік тому

    Let US & China compete BUT its the people who will have the...final say!!!

  • @Nivek389
    @Nivek389 10 місяців тому

    Could use more Rgb. But I guess it’s an alright build 😂

  • @marklandrebe3521
    @marklandrebe3521 Рік тому

    Figures that Cray is involved.

  • @BritskNguyen
    @BritskNguyen Рік тому +3

    Tianhe means Galaxy fyi

  • @Buttersausage
    @Buttersausage Рік тому +1

    Can’t wait for quantum chipped laptops 👩‍💻

  • @ADHD55
    @ADHD55 Рік тому

    Can it download OF content

  • @thl205
    @thl205 Рік тому

    China has your emails bro that’s how😂

  • @imp3r1alx
    @imp3r1alx Рік тому

    I wonder if minecraft could run on it.. or maybe lets try street fighter and tekken..

  • @MrSchweppes
    @MrSchweppes 11 місяців тому

    The US must build at least 10 these supercomputers a year. These supercomputers can accelerate medical research by a factor of 10. And all other major very difficult problems!

  • @pickashoe7870
    @pickashoe7870 Рік тому

    most optimal Minecraft spec

  • @TSulemanW
    @TSulemanW 11 місяців тому

    The question for what purposes can make benefit to all man kind

  • @bopsshift5737
    @bopsshift5737 Рік тому

    How about Japan?

  • @spootnik00
    @spootnik00 Рік тому +2

    AMD !

  • @jaycho6747
    @jaycho6747 Рік тому

    Here I am still stuck with Windows 95 at home.

  • @yuluoxianjun
    @yuluoxianjun Рік тому

    Yes,AMD

  • @joeykim6550
    @joeykim6550 Рік тому +1

    Skynet is coming .

  • @mrteacher1315
    @mrteacher1315 Рік тому +11

    Chinese supercomputers have better, more scalable architecture and are evolving faster....odds are once they catchup w semiconductor lithography, they will pretty much leave everybody behind

    • @jtgd
      @jtgd Рік тому

      Doubt it, If they take this long to “catch up”

    • @mrteacher1315
      @mrteacher1315 Рік тому +3

      @@jtgd only the Dutch has the lithograph technology....China has being regularly beating other countries in top supercomputers for quite a while until Summit took back the top spot thru sheer brute force

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 Рік тому

      Considering China is like 10 years behind in chip architecture so I very much doubt that.

    • @mrteacher1315
      @mrteacher1315 Рік тому +1

      @@jtgd actually, SMIC (Chinese semiconductor manufacturer) had being making 7nm chip since last year via packaging, using older lithography equipment.
      But more than that, you are assuming that supercomputer architecture somehow predicates on design of semiconductor chip.
      Supercomputer design has more to do with computer design. Semiconductors are only one small facet of overall computer design.

    • @ruud195
      @ruud195 Рік тому

      @@napobg6842 Correction 2 years.

  • @BitcoinStoic
    @BitcoinStoic Рік тому +1

    Bitcoin network has the top 500 super computers combined beat already

  • @bitcoinheist7831
    @bitcoinheist7831 Рік тому +14

    Us vs China .. but actually Indian vs Chinese 🤣🤣

    • @chadester001
      @chadester001 Рік тому

      @Nonsense User
      1 china born chinesse and india born indian in team US vs 2 india born indian (working in chinesse company ) and mainland chinesee...

    • @theGalactic57
      @theGalactic57 Рік тому

      Don't be happy..... He's just an employee and probably media spokesperson.

    • @AwardQueue
      @AwardQueue 20 днів тому

      typical brag love Indian.

  • @bruceongtiaobok7365
    @bruceongtiaobok7365 Рік тому +4

    But can it run Crysis?

  • @user-pi2lq
    @user-pi2lq Рік тому

    How many Bitcoin can it unlock

  • @capnrob97
    @capnrob97 Рік тому +1

    When you look at the top 500 list, the top two Chinese computers listed use a ton of electricity for the amount of petaflops they produce.

  • @DeathInJune83
    @DeathInJune83 Рік тому +1

    I have no mouth and I must scream

  • @kovelamanas9905
    @kovelamanas9905 Рік тому +12

    when sadhguru becomes a scientist this is how he sounds like😀😀

  • @bl5752
    @bl5752 Рік тому

    Do we need these computors to know we need to stop burning fossil fuels? Because I thought we figured that out 30 years ago when we still had dial up.

  • @rongarcia2128
    @rongarcia2128 Рік тому +2

    It's weird that I'm kinda proud of China. When visited 15 years ago, they didn't even have decent public toilet. I just don't understand why ppl are working overtime so that Chinese can't spend a night with full stomach. 😑

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 Рік тому

      Very easy. It is because China wants to get food by stealing the food out of other peoples' tables.

    • @rongarcia2128
      @rongarcia2128 Рік тому

      @@napobg6842 their tables have been burnt and destroyed by the alleged victims who also happen to be the biggest stealers of all time. I assume you have no problem with that

    • @napobg6842
      @napobg6842 Рік тому +1

      @@rongarcia2128 Elaborate because you literally said nothing

  • @luigi3083
    @luigi3083 Рік тому +1

    metric pls

    • @Legalize.Raping.Russian.Broads
      @Legalize.Raping.Russian.Broads Рік тому

      Why? You are watching a video pertaining to AMERICAN supercomputers. Learn *OUR* terminology. Why should we have to cater to irrelevant measurements? Except for science (because science uses metric system *ONLY*)

  • @netizencapet
    @netizencapet Рік тому +4

    What I'm interested in are 2 kinds of models that might be getting airtime in China, but are likely far down the list on the US supercomputer problem run schedule. These are 1. dynamic resource-based economic planning models (an ultra-informed and contingency-conditioned 5 year plan--but it would work better on US data because unlike the PRC, we aren't lying through our teeth on every core metric).
    2. Economic prediction models, yes of equities markets (and the input data on the company side would need to be more robust than quarterly earnings statements but might start there), but also entire macroeconomic system models in forex and sovereign debt, etc.
    On second thought, since economic input data is likely still very janky and uneven, maybe scrap the above and stick to cool physics, design of automated algorithm-writing/code-writing tools, weather and decryption.
    NSA project leader has crossed out all but the last word of my wishlist above, with a not-dissatisfied smirk.

  • @smartyydon
    @smartyydon Рік тому +5

    Thomas Zaccharia was a NIT graduate now heads oak ridge laboratory.
    Another name in countless Great Indian brain drain.

    • @TLiu-1b
      @TLiu-1b Рік тому

      brain drain def happens for china also, the US is benefiting from the worlds talent.

    • @TLiu-1b
      @TLiu-1b Рік тому

      @Bruhhh Channelchinas research is severely underfunded, research institutes are state controlled, opportunities are very limited compared to the US.

    • @chadester001
      @chadester001 Рік тому

      @Zaydan Naufal when last time u heard balkan BUSINESSMAN

  • @kenth151
    @kenth151 7 місяців тому

    Garbage in Garbage out.. lol just kidding.

  • @SkiddyBeef
    @SkiddyBeef Рік тому

    But can it run cyber punk?

  • @omutvtube3910
    @omutvtube3910 Рік тому

    Skynet anyone? Better build a kill switch into it.

  • @nesseihtgnay9419
    @nesseihtgnay9419 Рік тому

    Nvidia is releasing its own supercomputer too.

  • @mju911
    @mju911 Рік тому +1

    Ccp we steal your research and development and call it our own. Winnie the pooh

  • @David-hn7zm
    @David-hn7zm Рік тому

    lol

  • @engineeranonymous
    @engineeranonymous Рік тому +55

    Its claimed that China has two over exaflops supercomputers and one is being built. OceanLight uses Sunway SW26010 it has 1.2 exaflops of single-precision computing power, or 4.4 exaflops of mixed-precision Tianhe-3 uses Phytium 2000+ FTP Arm chip plus a Matrix 2000+ MTP accelerator. Its estimated that estimated 1.7 exaflops peak performance and just over 1.3 exaflops on Linpack. The information is all hearsay from David Kahaner. As far as we know no one outside China has seen these systems. After US begin adding every Chinese supercomputer firm to sanction list China stop giving information about their capabilities. We literally have to reverse engineer bitcoin miner to learn that SMIC has 7 nm capacity.

    • @marktrinidad7650
      @marktrinidad7650 Рік тому

      Only gullible people believes what China says.

    • @engineeranonymous
      @engineeranonymous Рік тому +20

      @中国没盟友 Because China goes full stealth mode in their technical capabilities since whenever China make a technical achievement US tries to block it with a sanction. The only way to learn what China can do is reverse engineering what China manufactures. Simple for consumer products pretty hard for military equipment. I hope that's what you are asking I google translate your question.

    • @pencilandpaper4516
      @pencilandpaper4516 Рік тому +1

      @中国没盟友 *What WSJ will not tell you is that China have not released their latest data for the last five years (which is deemed as classified as not worthy of frivolous "race" it is well known in Chinese internet Guess English speaking western people still have yet caught up :) ) that is why America machines were able to "catch up"*
      By the way, American installed chip ban and sanctions on Chinese companies working on supercomputing since early 2000s and space station since 1980s

    • @benfinesilver2250
      @benfinesilver2250 Рік тому

      China lies

    • @johnmaris1582
      @johnmaris1582 Рік тому +3

      Since it began in 2015, without US semiconductor design firm, do China have capability or talent that can rival US design? Manufacturing are just part of the problem which you mention and SMIC have manage that. What Chinese firm rival Intel, Nvidia and AMD? The hearsay can be entirely false.

  • @hypernova4123
    @hypernova4123 10 місяців тому

    Not even close!
    US has the fastest supercomputer and have the fastest quantum computer

  • @Yashuop
    @Yashuop Рік тому +7

    Claim your “here within an hour” ticket right here ❤️

  • @winkstorm
    @winkstorm Рік тому +1

    US keep fueling China’s determination.