For safety and tanking, you can install a Don lantern together with Meurs. She adds count with the first skill, and with the third she goes to 0 by spending the count, but the second skill is a little inconvenient. Due to the fact that she is a tank, talismans will go to her, but still, due to her count management, she is also good at inflicting rupter potency with talismans
@@romaplay630 it has come to my attention that this will be quite the problematic phenomenon for the creator team and the cybernetic endeavour to deal with indeed
Talisman Sinclair this, Talisman Sinclair that.... When will people realize that the real problem is with rupture ITSELF and not the Talisman Sinclair? Rupture should not have existed at all. Burn is slow (once per turn rupture), sinking needs abnos or butterfly to deal damage (situational rapture), tremor didn't do anything for a almost a year until coversions and Reverb (restricted imitation of rupture), bleed is uncontrollable due to unbreakable coins (sanguine desire fixes it, but you won't be able to spam this ego every turn) (uncontrollable rupture), poise is selfish and is only 20% damage increase with a chance that you need to build up (mere 2 damage up unless coin states otherwise) , charge is charge - you gain it then you spend it on what you need (charge potency allowed new units to have build up in long fights) And what is rupture? True damage that you can control. It is culmination of best features of bleed and sinking (sinking for control, bleed for true damage). Such status, that invalidates poise, tremor and burn due to outdamaging burn with just TWO hits, simplifying the mechanism or doing damage, unlike tremor and having a lot of impact in fight unlike Poise. So, rupture should not have existed in first place. But, now that it exists, we MUST be able to maintain every status effect outside if mirror dungen, because.... "everything is OP in MD". Even rupture should not be halted due to it power, because everything must be fun for players, right? Rupture needs a lot of planning skills, patience and investment of resources from player (one miscalculation and your stack is dead). So, if you playing such meticulous status, you MUST be rewarded accordingly. So, in conclusion, PM should embrace the rupture and give it proper units - without conditions like in 9clair (again, why are we having defense level down in status that deals true damage despite everything (even protection)?) P.S. Anyway, sorry for my rant. Needed to vent off and say something about rupture. Happy new 2025 year to everyone who reads this!!! ❤❤❤🎄🎄🎄❄️❄️❄️🎆🎆🎆
Rupture wouldn't have been that broken if the units were correctly balanced around it. It is mechanically overpowered, yes, but Poise is extremely weak mechanically (low damage multiplier, decays over time *and* on crit) and yet it has some of the most powerful IDs in the game (Kimsault and Ahabmael). Talisman was Rupture's doom because he made it extremely easy for any unit, Rupture or not, to stack Rupture, when Rupture's low Potency and Count was one of the main things holding it back from being the strongest status effect.
@@psl6145 Well, Talisman Sinclair was the catalyst - if it was only implemented as EGO (sanguine desire but for rupture that influcts 5 talisman on one target), there wouldn't be any problem at all, but... Once again, the fault lies with PM, all of it!
@@shardtherox First of all, that would be a nerf and a potential lawsuit. Second of all, lccb Ryoshu support passive was broken and worked not how it was supposed to work. They just figured out how to fix it only after half a year. Because additional +350% damage on an AOE shooting skill IS NOT OK, let's be honest. And don't forget the drawback of the talisman status effect - you're literally going to "explode" from all that rupture, if enemy hits you two or more times if you have talisman on yourself
![[Limbus Company] Charge Is Truly Amazing At Everything](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DHmR_uXcIx8/mqdefault.jpg)
Just goes to show why PM is so stingy with rupture count, it can be very OP. Talisman Sinclair’s very existence changes rupture
in canto 8 they're going to put sinclair in a dress and make him carry rupture count
@@cheesedtobriehere That dress being carmen's dress, because he's related to her!
@ThomasOwOD absolutely... (?)
The fault is on talisclair for the goofy rupture units we've been getting recently!!!!
While you're partially right, consider: Devyat sinclair.
@@deimantaslapiniauskas7388he gets count positive after 15 counts tho
@@someguyg7367 he gets count positive BEFORE 3 count
@@deimantaslapiniauskas7388 are we talking about the same devyat Sinclair? Cause all his skills require 15 count of his charges to make him positive
@@someguyg7367 i meant rupture count
Well, now I know of yet another way to abuse Talisman Res strats to new, somewhat consistent heights.
For safety and tanking, you can install a Don lantern together with Meurs. She adds count with the first skill, and with the third she goes to 0 by spending the count, but the second skill is a little inconvenient. Due to the fact that she is a tank, talismans will go to her, but still, due to her count management, she is also good at inflicting rupter potency with talismans
Syncing the edits to the music is just 😘👌
“so are you a poise id or a rupture id?”
“yes”
holy shit hes awesome
すげー！やってみるわ👍
Wait if the skills stop Inflicting rupture because of the passive, then how did he get on 99?
pretty sure its only the rupture directly from the skill
rupture from things like gifts/support passives still work(?)
@Thirty_Five
Talisman is still able to inflict rupture even when conditional is mey
@@romaplay630 it has come to my attention that this will be quite the problematic phenomenon for the creator team and the cybernetic endeavour to deal with indeed
@@The-Fanciest_Of_Pantspmoon when they accidentally created ring sang 2.0
ah yes pale damage
Too much math. Bad video
I.W.F.Y.
G.B.T.S
Skin Care, translate!
@@Lyinghoget back to school i think
@@Karino22 Skin care 😭
Isn't the music from hat in time
Talisman Sinclair this, Talisman Sinclair that....
When will people realize that the real problem is with rupture ITSELF and not the Talisman Sinclair?
Rupture should not have existed at all. Burn is slow (once per turn rupture), sinking needs abnos or butterfly to deal damage (situational rapture), tremor didn't do anything for a almost a year until coversions and Reverb (restricted imitation of rupture), bleed is uncontrollable due to unbreakable coins (sanguine desire fixes it, but you won't be able to spam this ego every turn) (uncontrollable rupture), poise is selfish and is only 20% damage increase with a chance that you need to build up (mere 2 damage up unless coin states otherwise) , charge is charge - you gain it then you spend it on what you need (charge potency allowed new units to have build up in long fights)
And what is rupture? True damage that you can control. It is culmination of best features of bleed and sinking (sinking for control, bleed for true damage). Such status, that invalidates poise, tremor and burn due to outdamaging burn with just TWO hits, simplifying the mechanism or doing damage, unlike tremor and having a lot of impact in fight unlike Poise.
So, rupture should not have existed in first place. But, now that it exists, we MUST be able to maintain every status effect outside if mirror dungen, because.... "everything is OP in MD". Even rupture should not be halted due to it power, because everything must be fun for players, right?
Rupture needs a lot of planning skills, patience and investment of resources from player (one miscalculation and your stack is dead). So, if you playing such meticulous status, you MUST be rewarded accordingly.
So, in conclusion, PM should embrace the rupture and give it proper units - without conditions like in 9clair (again, why are we having defense level down in status that deals true damage despite everything (even protection)?)
P.S. Anyway, sorry for my rant. Needed to vent off and say something about rupture. Happy new 2025 year to everyone who reads this!!!
❤❤❤🎄🎄🎄❄️❄️❄️🎆🎆🎆
Rupture wouldn't have been that broken if the units were correctly balanced around it. It is mechanically overpowered, yes, but Poise is extremely weak mechanically (low damage multiplier, decays over time *and* on crit) and yet it has some of the most powerful IDs in the game (Kimsault and Ahabmael). Talisman was Rupture's doom because he made it extremely easy for any unit, Rupture or not, to stack Rupture, when Rupture's low Potency and Count was one of the main things holding it back from being the strongest status effect.
bait used to be believable
red mist
(hny btw)
@@psl6145 Well, Talisman Sinclair was the catalyst - if it was only implemented as EGO (sanguine desire but for rupture that influcts 5 talisman on one target), there wouldn't be any problem at all, but...
Once again, the fault lies with PM, all of it!
I don’t know why they don’t just completely rework his support passive. Like they already did it with LCCB Ryoshu and refunded everyone
@@shardtherox First of all, that would be a nerf and a potential lawsuit.
Second of all, lccb Ryoshu support passive was broken and worked not how it was supposed to work. They just figured out how to fix it only after half a year. Because additional +350% damage on an AOE shooting skill IS NOT OK, let's be honest.
And don't forget the drawback of the talisman status effect - you're literally going to "explode" from all that rupture, if enemy hits you two or more times if you have talisman on yourself