UV light kills viruses. Why isn't it everywhere?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лют 2024
  • The promise and pitfalls of using light to stop germs.
    Subscribe to our channel! goo.gl/0bsAjO
    When you think of disinfecting a space, what comes to mind? Wipes? Gels? Sprays? Maybe air purifiers or effective HVAC systems? All of these are great defenses against viruses and bacteria, but one thing has been missing from the toolkit despite our knowing about it for over a century: light.
    Ultraviolet light is an incredibly powerful disinfectant. Study after study has proven that it can obliterate viruses and bacteria, and yet it’s not often thought about as a defense against germs. In fact, when most people think of UV, they think of the harmful rays from the sun that cause cancer - not the PR you want when advertising, obviously. Luckily, a few years after the pandemic lockdowns, researchers have found a type of UV that isn’t strong enough to penetrate human skin but still effectively stops the germs. Could it be our next defense? Check out the video above to learn more.
    Don’t forget to read the full article on our website by Dylan Matthews: www.vox.com/the-highlight/239...
    Studies on far-UV’s effectiveness against various viruses can be found here: www.nature.com/articles/s4159...
    www.nature.com/articles/s4159...
    www.nature.com/articles/s4159...
    For more on ozone production (including Barber’s study):
    pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021...
    (MIT’s write-up on her study: news.mit.edu/2023/germicidal-...)
    pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021...
    The ill-fated mouse study (even though they didn’t get cancer this time, we’re still sad about it!):
    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/f...
    The original study from 1937 can be found here:
    ghdcenter.hms.harvard.edu/fil...
    For more on 1Day Sooner and Far UV Technologies:
    www.1daysooner.org/about/
    faruv.com/
    Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out www.vox.com.
    Watch our full video catalog: goo.gl/IZONyE
    Follow Vox on Facebook: goo.gl/U2g06o
    Or Twitter: goo.gl/XFrZ5H

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @israrisrar3800
    @israrisrar3800 3 місяці тому +3216

    "why isn't it everywhere?" Should be a docu series

    • @CapnCody1622
      @CapnCody1622 3 місяці тому +164

      I’m sure 90% of the time, the answer is cost and greed.

    • @adrianblake8876
      @adrianblake8876 3 місяці тому

      And in this case, lying to the audience. The video literally said "Far-UV doesn't cause cancer", which is outright false. UV-C is the most harmful of the UV lights...

    • @Y2Kvids
      @Y2Kvids 3 місяці тому +30

      Don't give them ideas .. for free

    • @tiffanysandmeier4753
      @tiffanysandmeier4753 3 місяці тому +31

      Cost and greed go hand in hand, but even without greed, the cost of good UV lights is still very expensive. And isn't necessarily greed but cost effectiveness.
      They are expensive to produce and don't necessarily last that long. I am saying this as someone with just the experience of buying UVB bulbs for a pet reptile. The florescent UV bulb has to be replaced around every 6 months even if it is still producing light because the bulb breaks down in a way and produces less UV light. And testing that UV is being produced isn't practical. It isn't something that we can see, so it is better for the animal to switch periodically than to wait for it to burn out. And they are much more expensive than regular florescent bulbs.

    • @CapnCody1622
      @CapnCody1622 3 місяці тому +8

      @@tiffanysandmeier4753 Then that proves that it’s a greed thing. UV lights are clearly beneficial. In your context, sure, it is expensive but you do it because you’re not greedy for the wellbeing of your pet. The government needs to think the same way about their citizens. Not everything needs to be monetarily profitable if it improves the wellbeing of humans.

  • @krishp1104
    @krishp1104 3 місяці тому +2478

    My biggest fear getting a Far UV light bulb would be that manufacturers cut costs and ship defected UV lights that are harmful

    • @jayandremcmurtry7331
      @jayandremcmurtry7331 3 місяці тому +276

      which they totally would 😭

    • @FriskyDingo329
      @FriskyDingo329 3 місяці тому +48

      From Chima?

    • @youtube7076
      @youtube7076 3 місяці тому

      so is 5g but who cares....

    • @xryphon
      @xryphon 3 місяці тому +94

      @@FriskyDingo329 Probably from the US or somewhere else, quality control is pretty difficult and costly

    • @my.names.robb.with.two.bs1
      @my.names.robb.with.two.bs1 3 місяці тому +60

      Then they'll come up with a UV detector that will tell you what a device is giving off. Like a carbon monoxide detector.

  • @sebastienwatling349
    @sebastienwatling349 3 місяці тому +2106

    Another thing to be considered is that UV is EXTREMELY damaging to some materials such as plastics. there would be unexpected costs on paints , computers, appliances, Anything with plastic on it.

    • @seanplace8192
      @seanplace8192 3 місяці тому +280

      Exactly. UV doesn't just break down DNA of microbes, it also breaks down other chemical bonds, including those in plastics and other synthetic materials. This is why you may see some plastics begin to "Yellow" after being left outside for so long.

    • @SweetHyunho
      @SweetHyunho 3 місяці тому +84

      Yay, more microplastics!

    • @my.names.robb.with.two.bs1
      @my.names.robb.with.two.bs1 3 місяці тому +31

      The free market will pivot with the proper solution when the time comes like it always has. Spread the word.

    • @MildMisanthropeMaybeMassive
      @MildMisanthropeMaybeMassive 3 місяці тому +51

      Also pigments and anything printed as anyone who left photos, books, papers facing a bright window for years know.

    • @michaeladkins6
      @michaeladkins6 3 місяці тому +64

      @@my.names.robb.with.two.bs1 Oh good. Just trust free market Capitalism.

  • @88GODZORA88
    @88GODZORA88 3 місяці тому +2152

    Vox unfortunately missed a few very important points to UV. HVAC Enginner here. For the last 100 years UV lights have largely been mercury lamps which have their own health risks. LED technology is getting there, but it hasn't got to the point of commercial usage. I am also surprised how much they glossed over how HVAC systems for non-residential often use UV for coil cleaning and you can add lights more to clean the air. I guess they simply don't understand you can add this to the airstream of 100% OA system and provide relatively clean air for building occupants. Also, you STILL need filtration and standard is to go with at least a MERV-13 filter as a final filter before entering most spaces. This is a 7min video but the fact they didn't talk more than a few words in this aspect of air treatment is mind boggling.

    • @user-pg1ns1tf3o
      @user-pg1ns1tf3o 3 місяці тому +175

      good but this isn't a HVAC enginer class its a vox video

    • @krishp1104
      @krishp1104 3 місяці тому +92

      yeah they mentioned it at the end for a minute because this is a video about UV not HVAC. Though I do think they could've easily added a little bit more about it

    • @SamSB250
      @SamSB250 3 місяці тому +55

      you have a point. i do think that what these type of video does do is make you wanna know more about it. look at these types of video as a " Kick starter " the spark that lights up ur Curiosity.

    • @ttoleafoa70
      @ttoleafoa70 3 місяці тому +45

      What's a few words to you is a lot of info intake for us who are not familiar with this field

    • @sixclones6672
      @sixclones6672 3 місяці тому +20

      Regarding the LED technology, there is a very good video by Veritasium on this topic published around a week ago

  • @jimaaman
    @jimaaman 3 місяці тому +790

    "low wavelength" is a confusing way to say "short wavelength". It would seem less confusing to say "short" since the term "low frequency" is associated with long wavelengths (not short wavelengths like UV-C)

    • @reynamainz
      @reynamainz 3 місяці тому +75

      glad someone else noticed this too. even the illustrations of the waves are inaccurate. and to think that UV-C waves are closer to x-rays in the spectrum. this is just plain confusing for the average viewer.

    • @giovannirafael5351
      @giovannirafael5351 3 місяці тому +56

      It's also super confusing, because short wavelength means higher energy and should be even more dangerous.

    • @ipikluninja91
      @ipikluninja91 3 місяці тому +8

      Istg I thought the same. I was so confused when she said "low" wavelength. I understood that as long wavelength at first because I usually associate long wavelength = low frequency = red side of the spectrum. Then after I thought a bit realized she meant "short" wavelength.

    • @user82938
      @user82938 3 місяці тому +22

      She seems like she did one day of learning before making this video.

    • @DANGJOS
      @DANGJOS 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@reynamainz How are they closer to X-rays?

  • @thermitebanana
    @thermitebanana 3 місяці тому +280

    "Low wavelength" is the weirdest expression, and I don't think I've heard it before.
    Short wavelength - yes
    Low frequency (which means LONG wavelength) also yes
    Low wavelength - never

    • @yevrahhipstar3902
      @yevrahhipstar3902 3 місяці тому +3

      Peak to trough?

    • @evonne315
      @evonne315 3 місяці тому +5

      It's just a little depressed.

    • @aut0tech
      @aut0tech 3 місяці тому +3

      may be a new american way using words...lol

    • @hbrpaulo
      @hbrpaulo 3 місяці тому

      It means Low wavelength frequency, perhaps... I don't know

    • @MagicRoadrunner
      @MagicRoadrunner 3 місяці тому +2

      @@hbrpaulo The formula used to describe the relation of wavelength and velocity is "wavelength = velocity devided by frequency" (in light waves, velocity will be the speed of light). Wavelength refers to the length of one period, Frequency refers to the amount of periods that pass in a certain time. The smaller a period is (short wavelength) the more periods fit in a second (high frequency), as you can also see in the formula. Small ("low") wavelength thus means high frequency, high frequency means high energy. "Low" sounds like "less intense", which makes no sense when talking about wavelengths.

  • @kodakomp
    @kodakomp 3 місяці тому +249

    One of the biggest uses for UV light is in water/wastewater treatment. Was not mentioned at all. Helps with lowering the level of chlorine that is needed on water supplies drastically as you don't need as much to have a chlorine residual. Also the UV bulbs are secured in a vessel where it is not harmful to humans.

    • @tabby73
      @tabby73 3 місяці тому +9

      I was also waiting for this to be mentioned. We used to have a water filter/purifier that used UV light to make water safe to drink.

    • @sethsmith6042
      @sethsmith6042 3 місяці тому +2

      @@tabby73 Those are perfect for backpacking, so much better than drinking iodine!

    • @GungaLaGunga
      @GungaLaGunga 3 місяці тому +13

      which makes me wonder why we don't use UV light to keep swimming pool water sterilized instead of massive amount of chlorine and muriatic acid.

    • @jsaunders2152
      @jsaunders2152 3 місяці тому +3

      I was waiting for them to say that too but I guess the focus of the video was on open spaces where people live/work and not on what we consume.

    • @jwonz2054
      @jwonz2054 3 місяці тому

      It just shows the level of superficial analysis that Vox performs. Keep this in mind when they do more contentious topics.@@jsaunders2152

  • @wllmsp9338
    @wllmsp9338 3 місяці тому +207

    I have a UV sterilization "box" for my CPAP equipment. One unmentioned problem is how BAD the UV sterilization process makes the tubing and other pieces smell. As it radiates microscopic stuff it causes the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This odor has been described as a sulfuric smell similar to rotten eggs, garlic, or burning hair. It's so nasty that I've reverted to cleaning with baking soda and non-scented dishwashing soap. So much for convenience.

    • @SarahEZiegler
      @SarahEZiegler 3 місяці тому +8

      Interesting, as someone sensitive to VOCs but also covid cautious, I had been excited by far UV but not aware of this, thanks for sharing, this was valuable information.

    • @reid.manares
      @reid.manares 3 місяці тому +14

      That's ozone.

    • @ArawnOfAnnwn
      @ArawnOfAnnwn 3 місяці тому +7

      @@SarahEZiegler UV causes reactions in more than just DNA. It also degrades anything made of plastic, among others.

    • @SarahEZiegler
      @SarahEZiegler 3 місяці тому +2

      @@ArawnOfAnnwn Yes, that is correct, I read quite a bit about it after watching this video and also read that. I still do think it may be a promising way to reduce the risks associated with exposure to airborne pathogens though, definitely needs to be done very cautiously though.

    • @Species-lj8wh
      @Species-lj8wh 2 місяці тому

      The same here. Tried it, and a month later got rid of it.

  • @willemvandebeek
    @willemvandebeek 3 місяці тому +385

    The problem with UV light killing those bad viruses is, that 99.999% of the good microbes out there are killed as well...
    Living in a too sterile environment is in the long term not healthy either.

    • @MauritsWilke
      @MauritsWilke 3 місяці тому +4

      Why not?

    • @triiidot
      @triiidot 3 місяці тому +86

      ​@@MauritsWilke imagine if you stop using your legs your muscles will "forget" how to work, its like that with your immune system because your body creates its own atycorps

    • @nicholasgreen8703
      @nicholasgreen8703 3 місяці тому +48

      ​@@MauritsWilkeyour immune system is like a muscle. The more you responsibly work it, the stronger it gets. Without proper stimulation it gets lazy

    • @willemvandebeek
      @willemvandebeek 3 місяці тому +52

      @@MauritsWilke if the immune system doesn't get in touch with any microbes because of the clean sterile environment, it will start attacking benevolent substances, like peanuts, dog hair, latex, etc., and now an allergy has begun to develop.

    • @gypsyvegan
      @gypsyvegan 3 місяці тому +32

      The immune system is nothing like a muscle - it is more akin to a clutch on a manual transmission vehicle. Every time you use it, you use a little of it UP. @kurzgesagt has an excellent explainer on this. Akiko Iwasaki does an excellent job of making immunology approachable, she has several videos here on YT.

  • @Max_Ivanov_Pro
    @Max_Ivanov_Pro 3 місяці тому +612

    I never realized how versatile and effective UV light can be for disinfection. It's amazing how many different applications it has!

    • @notmewooshme9916
      @notmewooshme9916 3 місяці тому

      I will make an obvious statement on this checkmark account and gain potential subscribers 🤓🤓

    • @HariSupriono
      @HariSupriono 3 місяці тому +33

      Oh dear it's an Ethereum scammer. I can't remember the last time I saw one of these back when I simply watched UA-cam without commenting

    • @Natboy23
      @Natboy23 3 місяці тому

      UV is used to treat water all the time@@HariSupriono

    • @bluecat5669
      @bluecat5669 3 місяці тому +12

      This guy bought a 1 million sub channel

    • @dylanbystedt
      @dylanbystedt 3 місяці тому +2

      Well, this video leaves a lot of info out... like bulb age, lumens, time, physical dirt, etc... there are many things to account for in UV disinfection. If it was simply better it would be everywhere.

  • @jimmurphy6095
    @jimmurphy6095 3 місяці тому +58

    One benefit not mentioned is that this will also work on the so called "super bugs" that are resistant to current antibiotics. They can't build up a defense against this.

    • @Happy-xi9hl
      @Happy-xi9hl 3 місяці тому +18

      They can...eventually some bacteria will come up with a mutation allowing it to survive UV, but it'll come at a huge cost.... nothing is impossible in the bacteria world....

    • @hanifarroisimukhlis5989
      @hanifarroisimukhlis5989 3 місяці тому

      @@Happy-xi9hl Ehhh... not really. Pretty much the only way to survive UV is melanin or cyst, both have huge tradeoff with infectivity.

    • @Selsato
      @Selsato 3 місяці тому +18

      "They can't build up a defense against this" is the funniest possible sentence to say in the context of superbugs lol

    • @JPA65
      @JPA65 3 місяці тому +3

      Nature finds a way

    • @RickJaeger
      @RickJaeger 3 місяці тому

      I would bet against nature finding a way, tbh. Getting blasted with large doses of high-energy radiation is one of those things that kills things universally, such as getting dropped into the Sun.

  • @pabloesparza1990
    @pabloesparza1990 3 місяці тому +197

    So look at the date I post this. This is something I have already commented on. The best 2 places this could be utilized would be in your refrigerator and in your bath/shower, not the entire bathroom. If you set those 2 locations up with a timer, you would get clean food that would last longer in the fridge and a shower that wouldn't grow pink/black patches. The negative side would be that the materials used in those locations would probably deteriorate a tiny bit faster, meaning that corporations would be happy. That's the offset foe getting the benefits of the light. Since it would come with a timer, you could also just choose not to use it as often. Point made here on this date money will be made later.

    • @RyanFennec
      @RyanFennec 3 місяці тому +1

      🤔

    • @rogerhargreaves2272
      @rogerhargreaves2272 3 місяці тому +2

      Correct, it can cause material decomposition.
      I use U.V.C. in the kitchen on a timer so no one is exposed to the radiation.

    • @IndigoIndustrial
      @IndigoIndustrial 3 місяці тому +24

      I use a UV torch to treat the sealant (mastic) in my shower to stop mould growing.
      It works.

    • @ASelfAwareCoolCranchDorito
      @ASelfAwareCoolCranchDorito 3 місяці тому +2

      @@IndigoIndustrial thats actually genius

    • @halgerson
      @halgerson 3 місяці тому +3

      My first thought was installing them under the cabinets in the kitchen to disinfect work surfaces. Of course it wouldn't be enough to stop cross-contamination while cooking (e.g. using the same cutting board for poultry and vegetables without washing), but maybe to disinfect the counter so it is disinfectanted the next day.

  • @Xanderviceory
    @Xanderviceory 3 місяці тому +95

    I use UV bulbs to eradicate mold in housing areas, works like a charm, just can't forget protective gear

    • @Y2Kvids
      @Y2Kvids 3 місяці тому +4

      Just damages paint and plastics

    • @FlyinDogRecords
      @FlyinDogRecords 3 місяці тому

      Can you expand on this please. I heard mold had to be cut off in the area. If not it can spread. Have you been successful at using the bulb in porus material?

    • @philipk89
      @philipk89 3 місяці тому

      Mold means not enough ventilation. Get the warm humid air out and cool dry air in. Preferably using a HRV system (heat recovery ventilation). Haven’t had any mold here since it was installed a few years ago!

    • @FlyinDogRecords
      @FlyinDogRecords 3 місяці тому +1

      @@philipk89 Thank you so much. I will look into it. I had it sent to the lab and it came back non toxicity c but I'm going to get rid of it and look into the recovery system.

    • @Rudenbehr
      @Rudenbehr 3 місяці тому +3

      @@philipk89some places like bathrooms are just naturally awful for mold

  • @Tindog81476
    @Tindog81476 3 місяці тому +21

    Sometime interesting is during the pandemic we were manufacturing some LED UV lights for the military, and a strange thing happened we found when we shined a UV light on oil it lost its stickiness and fell to the ground. It was super odd. We were all just like "Did you know UV light did that?" Not sure an application for that but it was an interesting thing that we didn't know UV did. As soon as you removed the light the oil returned to being sticky. Kinda weird to see, I'm sure there is probably an application here, but we were just trying to disinfect surfaces.

    • @iknowsolittle
      @iknowsolittle 3 місяці тому +6

      dude. this is a super interesting comment. could you expand on this or find some other people talking about this? pretty please?

    • @grilledflatbread4692
      @grilledflatbread4692 3 місяці тому +4

      sounds like it would help in cleaning

    • @Tindog81476
      @Tindog81476 3 місяці тому

      That was literally the first thing we thought of/did we stuck it in our CNC mills closed the doors and turned it on, and all the chips and oil on the walls fell down, unfortunately, due to light always traveling in a straight line it missed some spots, but still got it pretty clean, it looked almost new. We did have to be careful though since UV light is actually dangerous, but not bad for turning the lights on and off. The old oil when it fell looked like black water running down the sides of the machine, when the light turned off it resolidified again. So instead of the oil being on the top of the machine, it was now on the bottom of the machine. It was pretty cool we tried it on several machines.@@grilledflatbread4692

  • @jessetorres8738
    @jessetorres8738 3 місяці тому +201

    In the video game Dying Light 2, 1 way to survive against the zombie infection is to be near UV lights. It doesn't cure the characters of the zombie virus, but it does slow down the infection spreading in their bodies at night.

    • @1337billybob
      @1337billybob 3 місяці тому +35

      Speculative fiction has always been a great way to introduce ideas. It’s a good metaphor to start a discussion.

    • @lobaandrade7172
      @lobaandrade7172 3 місяці тому +18

      This is why I clicked on this video. Glad someone else did too

    • @quetzalcat2839
      @quetzalcat2839 2 місяці тому +1

      i love dying light

  • @mysisterisafoodie
    @mysisterisafoodie 3 місяці тому +26

    I work for a company that is working toward getting this FDA approved by the end of this year, we’re getting there!

    • @leahmcpherson7560
      @leahmcpherson7560 3 місяці тому +2

      Question: do the lamps generate a buzzing or humming? I'm susceptible to migraines but am still highly interested in a potential future purchase. Thank you for your time

    • @mysisterisafoodie
      @mysisterisafoodie 3 місяці тому

      @@leahmcpherson7560 no, not at all, they entire device is in a contained capsule, with a mini glass view point (that isn’t really functional, more for the aesthetics of people seeing “UV light”). So it’s really quiet! But there is a cooling fan, which isn’t any louder than a laptop. The mercury lamp does deteriorate and need replacement after a year, so that will be a pretty costly consumable, but hey, I guess it’s just like lamps in your current lighting situation. Just a lot more expensive.

    • @isaiahcabino6431
      @isaiahcabino6431 3 місяці тому

      What’s the name of the company? :)

  • @Manuel-hd8qf
    @Manuel-hd8qf 3 місяці тому +32

    I got hired at a light source company during the pandemic and business was booming for them

  • @HowVeryDelightful
    @HowVeryDelightful 3 місяці тому +135

    Having UV as a solution for cleanliness is misguided because it kills all microbes indiscriminately - microbes that are beneficial to humans and their environment. In some settings where cleanliness is of the utmost importance UV can be a good solution - such as hospital and laboratory settings where it is already in use.

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 3 місяці тому +15

      Only where the light touches though, which won't be everywhere. Even if not completely eliminated, just reducing the density of damaging pathogens in the environment goes a long way in suppressing the subsequent illness.

    • @watema3381
      @watema3381 3 місяці тому

      @@JDns-we4fw And soap.

    • @AcidRP
      @AcidRP 3 місяці тому +8

      It's not for everywhere though, it's for hospitals, events, malls, ect...

    • @Metqa
      @Metqa 3 місяці тому

      @@JDns-we4fw So does fire...

    • @gunsite45
      @gunsite45 3 місяці тому

      Very good comment. There's no need for this stuff at home. You aren't contacting the flu in your home bathroom or kitchen. Places where this is useful as you said, it's already there.

  • @jtwrecks
    @jtwrecks 3 місяці тому +17

    I have a UV light device with a proximity sensor that turns off if a human or pet is close to it. It's amazing

    • @soup331emd5
      @soup331emd5 3 місяці тому +1

      How much did it cost?

  • @clkersting
    @clkersting 3 місяці тому +19

    Maybe it's been mentioned, UV light also damages various materials. It prematurely breaks down plastics, wood, etc.

  • @steveswoodworking2504
    @steveswoodworking2504 3 місяці тому +21

    How does this affect people with lupus who are sensitive to the sun and can get a rash in minutes? I spend a great deal of money and effort staying away from UV light.

    • @Madonnalitta1
      @Madonnalitta1 2 місяці тому

      So it's not for you.
      Move on.

    • @steveswoodworking2504
      @steveswoodworking2504 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Madonnalitta1 Thanks for the kind words. If commercial businesses start putting these all over the place, it will affect me and others with lupus, and we may not even be aware they are being used. A lupus attack can start, which possibly can end up killing the kidneys. It's right in the title "Why isn't it everywhere", that is my concern.

    • @ockertoustesizem1234
      @ockertoustesizem1234 День тому

      these lights are already used in hvac and water filtration systems. these lights aren't supposed to be used on human skin

  • @malinullberg
    @malinullberg 3 місяці тому +8

    UV IS widely used as disinfectant in drinking water treatment plants, since a few decades! Very good against bacteria and parasites, but less so viruses
    /Process engineer for water systems

  • @bennydreamly
    @bennydreamly 3 місяці тому +42

    What about the good bacteria on your skin? and in the environment? What would that do?

    • @joelmulder
      @joelmulder 3 місяці тому

      UV kills them. It also damages the DNA in your skin with prolonged exposure just like sitting in the sun does, and will give you skin cancer.

    • @Karlach_
      @Karlach_ 3 місяці тому +20

      It kills them as well. UV light is indiscriminate with the bacteria and viruses it kills. This is why UV lights aren't good for households and are best used in places like hospitals and labs.

    • @kirbykracklemusic
      @kirbykracklemusic 3 місяці тому

      It kills them as well, but the moment you step outside again it comes rushing right back.

    • @kirbykracklemusic
      @kirbykracklemusic 3 місяці тому

      @@Karlach_Yes, UV-A and UV-B is best used in hospitals and labs. Far UV (222nm) cannot breach the outer layer of the skin or eye making it safe and extremely effective against both airborne and surface laying pathogens in the home and workplace.

    • @GP-qz6kk
      @GP-qz6kk 3 місяці тому +4

      @@kirbykracklemusic
      That prevents damage to our DNA and cancer, but there's also good microbes outside of our body.

  • @graemepennell
    @graemepennell 3 місяці тому +11

    So hold on, the first answer to your question tells you all you need to know, yet you still ask the question again for ... what? Hope of a different answer?

  • @trailerwookie
    @trailerwookie 3 місяці тому +6

    My friend built a rainwater collection and filtration system for a client. Part of the filtration and purification process involves UV light since the client uses the water for consumption.

  • @neo122333
    @neo122333 3 місяці тому +5

    I'm a bit concerned about the neutrality of having a CEO on who literally sells the UV lights discussed in the video. Wouldn't the profits from the advertising of his own use counter any negative downsides of the use?

  • @mabonora
    @mabonora 3 місяці тому +22

    Why did you choose to show the spectrum graph that way? I get that the axis is showing wavelength instead of frequency, but the other way around is more common and especially more clear! Even infrared gets its name because is "below" red and UV (ultraviolet) because is beyond violet, don't they?

    • @jmckendry84
      @jmckendry84 2 місяці тому

      I disagree that they way you describe is more common. It doesn't seem unusual to me for the plot to show shorter wavelengths on the left and longer wavelengths on the right.

    • @mabonora
      @mabonora 2 місяці тому

      @jmckendry84 And how do you explain INFRAred and ULTRAviolet?

  • @hanifarroisimukhlis5989
    @hanifarroisimukhlis5989 3 місяці тому +237

    Simple answer: it also hurts humans. Antiseptic don't really hurts (in small quantity).

    • @lazyman2451
      @lazyman2451 3 місяці тому

      It’ll blind you when waking up in the middle of the night with that s$&@ on

    • @FelipeKana1
      @FelipeKana1 3 місяці тому +14

      Also... it actually is everywhere. From the sun. That's why we should use sunblockers.

    • @adrianblake8876
      @adrianblake8876 3 місяці тому

      ​@@FelipeKana1 Ironically UVC isn't everywhere, because our atmosphere is very effective at blocking it. Shorter wavelengths, unlike what the video seems to imply, are more harmful. Even shorter than UVC are X-rays, and gamma rays, the latter being radioactively harmful...

    • @gypsyvegan
      @gypsyvegan 3 місяці тому

      It depends on what part of the spectrum/what wavelength you're talking about. 222nm is only harmful if you're in immediate proximity to it, and still effective at killing viruses. The OSLUV Project is a good resource, as is Aaron Collins (aka The Mask Nerd) here on YT.

    • @ether4211
      @ether4211 3 місяці тому +5

      Antiseptics also hurt humans and are grossly overused - especially during COVID. We don't fully know how much damage they do at low doses but they certainly have an impact on your microbiome and some are known to depress the immune system or cause serious allergic reactions. Not to mention that repeated low dose usage promotes antibiotic resistance.

  • @ebridgewater
    @ebridgewater 3 місяці тому +120

    Also keep in mind we don't want the general environment too clean. Our natural immune system is very important and needs to be trained.

    • @MedicinalBlood
      @MedicinalBlood 3 місяці тому +18

      That’s a myth. Old wives tale.

    • @madeline7272
      @madeline7272 3 місяці тому

      That’s what vaccines are for

    • @BenjaminGoose
      @BenjaminGoose 3 місяці тому +18

      Could you link to some information on that? I always thought it was true.@@MedicinalBlood

    • @HowVeryDelightful
      @HowVeryDelightful 3 місяці тому

      ​Not an old wives tale. Having a diverse microbiome has a myriad of different health benefits - including for your immune system. The key is close contact with nature. Many studies have shown significantly lower prevalence of auto-immune diseases in rural children compared to urban.@@MedicinalBlood

    • @AkshayKumarX
      @AkshayKumarX 3 місяці тому +13

      ​@@MedicinalBloodisn't that the reason why so many kids develop ailments like nut allergies, etc because they didn't have a varied diet in their early childhood years?
      Natural inoculation towards diseases works the same way doesn't it?

  • @007KrausBean
    @007KrausBean 3 місяці тому +45

    Great information. Sadly, here in America people seem to be of the "All or nothing" mindset which means I could see so many people latching on to UV as a fix for things and over doing it. This makes things worse and creates more problems. If only, the general public did more reading, research, and learning before going all in.

    • @gladitsnotme
      @gladitsnotme 3 місяці тому +7

      Yeah that's just an American thing, not a human problem at all. Only Americans overdo things.

    • @aiocafea
      @aiocafea 3 місяці тому +4

      @@gladitsnotme while I don't like generalisations, I do feel like the over-abundance in The US can promote a sort of 'spend now, think later' way of solving issues, where cost-effectiveness and consequences in the long term are not very visible with immediate prices up until deployment

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 3 місяці тому +3

      Americans express it openly, but the absolutist mindset is common throughout humanity particularly with easily-terrorized traditionalists.

    • @adrianblake8876
      @adrianblake8876 3 місяці тому

      This video is by definition, misinformation. The reason UV is harmful is because of the shorter wavelength, so they suggest bombarding us with lamps that emit even shorter wavelengths. The reason UVA and UVB are more infamous is because they have a long enough wavelength to NOT be blocked by our atmosphere.
      To demonstrate, we're bombarded 24/7 by extremely long wavelengths for radio broadcast, and the public panics even though they're relatively harmless...

    • @kirbykracklemusic
      @kirbykracklemusic 3 місяці тому

      An understandable concern, and with that the moment you turn it off or step outside everything starts growing back right away.

  • @buccizero
    @buccizero 3 місяці тому +4

    I set up my 1st aquarium back in 90.. it included a uv sterilizer.
    UV is unstoppable

  • @DanielDogeanu
    @DanielDogeanu 3 місяці тому +3

    Placing UV light barriers inside HVAC and filters seems far more effective to me than placing it directly into the room. Kind of like water sterilizers work.

  • @peterjones701
    @peterjones701 3 місяці тому +3

    When I used to work at a hospital I remember seeing UV sanitizers being wheeled around.

  • @charlieclarke3713
    @charlieclarke3713 3 місяці тому +6

    Thanks for this! Very informative!

  • @wombat.6652
    @wombat.6652 3 місяці тому +1

    The thing that worries me, the searches I do come up with a LOT of "buy our lamps" not a lot of scientist' studies.

  • @mikerooney7600
    @mikerooney7600 3 місяці тому +4

    They have Portable ones you can buy too. My Ultrablu literally doubles as a phone charger! Literal life saver.

    • @robertnathanson
      @robertnathanson 3 місяці тому +1

      I have one too. It’s the best thing ever and I just got one for the entire family! Thank you Michael Rooney!!!!! ❤😊

    • @HomesOnSocial
      @HomesOnSocial 3 місяці тому +2

      I have an UltraBlu for each member of my family as well. My wife and I actually use it all the time we preferred using it over hand sanitizer, which was drying out my hands to no end.

    • @mikerooney7600
      @mikerooney7600 3 місяці тому +2

      @HomesOnSocial all I want is a charged phone! The covid hocus pocus is a bonus 👌

    • @HomesOnSocial
      @HomesOnSocial 3 місяці тому

      @@mikerooney7600 facts!

  • @nguyenlamanh2919
    @nguyenlamanh2919 3 місяці тому +10

    Why low UV is safer? I thought the lower the wavelength, the stronger it is. Shouldn’t low UV create more cancer?

    • @waamintion5653
      @waamintion5653 3 місяці тому

      Its still on the high end of the frequency range. Its just low enough to not cause immediate damage.

    • @RyanFrazee-xs4gl
      @RyanFrazee-xs4gl 3 місяці тому +1

      Yes, UV-C is more powerful and more penetrating than UV-A or B, the writers of this video got it backwards.

  • @UjjwalKumar_234
    @UjjwalKumar_234 3 місяці тому +11

    "... even though they operate at a low wavelength ..." -- Vox 😂

  • @dystopia9289
    @dystopia9289 3 місяці тому +11

    Why isn't UV light used in every fridge, switching off when you open the door? Veggies would last much longer 🥦

    • @TLGIII
      @TLGIII 3 місяці тому +3

      I like our plan. When are we going to implement this and how much money can we make? You can be the CEO and I’ll be the CFO.

    • @1gorSouz4
      @1gorSouz4 3 місяці тому +7

      Someone commented that the uv light damages plastic

    • @Karlach_
      @Karlach_ 3 місяці тому +6

      Most foods are wrapped in or contained within plastics nowadays. UV light breaks down plastics.

    • @PeanutsandPopcorn
      @PeanutsandPopcorn 3 місяці тому

      @@TLGIII😂😂😂😂

    • @zettaiengineer4202
      @zettaiengineer4202 3 місяці тому +1

      absorbed uv generates heat which is counterproductive to keeping things cool

  • @jalex4251
    @jalex4251 3 місяці тому +3

    I own uv c lights and I caution people BE CAREFUL! they don’t seem strong until the damage is done.

  • @hayeonkim7838
    @hayeonkim7838 3 місяці тому +3

    Thanks for useful and informative video as always ❤❤❤

  • @tylerfortier2666
    @tylerfortier2666 3 місяці тому +6

    Dying Light 2 noises intensify

    • @Karlach_
      @Karlach_ 3 місяці тому +1

      Stray noises intensify as well

  • @jakemoeller7850
    @jakemoeller7850 3 місяці тому +2

    We had UV lights in the men's gym changing rooms. They were positioned on the walls near the ceiling, pointing up. This was in the early 60s.

  • @Susyyasmin
    @Susyyasmin 3 місяці тому +2

    Thank you for sharing this. Very insightful

  • @Pou1gie1
    @Pou1gie1 3 місяці тому +5

    I have a portable water purifier I got from REI in 2004 that uses UV light technology, and I used it is Papua New Guinea. I never got worms or any other ingestible pathogen ...so I guess it worked. Other ppl told me they had gotten stomach worms from drinking the water and eating the food.

  • @Realsagarbhat
    @Realsagarbhat 3 місяці тому +7

    "Drew, I need a UV Light."

  • @tonys.1946
    @tonys.1946 3 місяці тому +2

    I'm down for having this at my house, where I can turn it on when I'm at work

  • @SmoggySandwich
    @SmoggySandwich 3 місяці тому +6

    Put them on airplanes and in airports. I get sick every single time I fly and it would slow any spread of a new disease from country to country.

    • @SweetGypsyMamma213
      @SweetGypsyMamma213 3 місяці тому

      Yes because the air before the flight takes off and during landing is at peak toxicity while onboard a plane.

    • @FR-oz9px
      @FR-oz9px 3 місяці тому

      It’s already used in airports, but not in airplanes. Airplanes have HEPA-filters, because they’re recycling air inside, but they’re rather small. Air quality levels are often bad around boarding, if you carry a CO2-sensor with you, it’s quite astonishing to watch.
      I highly recommend you to wear a well-fitting respirator. I’ll never fly again without wearing one. There’s always going to be sick people on planes and it’ll only get worse from now on.

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 3 місяці тому +4

    There was a club owner who had a black lite on the dance floor. When that light burned out he replaced it, with a UV light meant for sanitation purposes only. UV-C.
    It liked just like the old light so he had no idea what he had done before the complaints started coming in.
    It was bad

    • @MrMonkeybat
      @MrMonkeybat 3 місяці тому

      How many people were affected? What were the worse injures?

    • @jmckendry84
      @jmckendry84 2 місяці тому

      Citation needed

    • @ockertoustesizem1234
      @ockertoustesizem1234 День тому

      @@jmckendry84 this happens more often than you think

  • @theemersonstuff
    @theemersonstuff 3 місяці тому +2

    Doesn't light reflect on surfaces? So, weren't those kids shown in the beginning of the video still in danger of developing cancer later in life?!

  • @michaelcarey
    @michaelcarey 3 місяці тому +5

    Low wavelength? Light is measured by its frequency. Does low wavelength mean low amplitude, a weak UV light? IIRC all UV-C is bad for you. There have been quite a few situations where people have inadvertently exposed to UV-C germicidal lamps instead of UV "blacklights" and suffered severe skin and eye damage.

    • @hund4440
      @hund4440 День тому

      Low wavelength is obviously short wave length. The value of length is low.

  • @YokoFuongAnh
    @YokoFuongAnh 3 місяці тому +5

    I have a LarQ water bottle that has UV light and I love that I dont; have to worry about bacteria/viruses that can be in the water I drink 🤗

  • @BudzBunny422
    @BudzBunny422 3 місяці тому +14

    Restaurants and fast-food use them in the kitchen. You might even see a blue light in the dining room area at some places.

    • @Martin-dz7gy
      @Martin-dz7gy 3 місяці тому +19

      Those are insect traps. The light attracts the insects and there is glue paper near it to catch them. They are not meant to sterilize the air

  • @dlwestphalen
    @dlwestphalen 3 місяці тому +5

    You guys missed the chance to show the Sanuvox products used in commercial (shopping malls, hospitals) and residential applications. I have it installed in my home HVAC system.

  • @joshnizzle
    @joshnizzle 3 місяці тому +1

    They need something like that in schools now. My kids are constantly sick anytime they go to school and get around other kids. But when they’re home long period of time they don’t get sick basically ever really.

    • @squibbelsmcjohnson
      @squibbelsmcjohnson 3 місяці тому

      Trying to shield your child from any and everything actually only does faaaaaaaaar more damage to them in life

    • @joshnizzle
      @joshnizzle 3 місяці тому

      @@squibbelsmcjohnson I didn’t say anything about shielding them from everything and making them soft pansies. You’re reading too much into that.

    • @andrej2321
      @andrej2321 13 днів тому +1

      Kids get dozen of colds a year. Deal with it or just don’t have kids.

  • @hko2006
    @hko2006 3 місяці тому

    Ya I remember seeing one in my classroom, I wondered how effective it was, thank you answering this for me

  • @4RILDIGITAL
    @4RILDIGITAL 3 місяці тому +4

    I hadn't realized the potential of far-UV light as a disinfectant until now. The possible side effects, such as ozone production, are definitely a concern that should be further researched. This could indeed be an important additional tool in our health safety toolkit.

  • @DJH316007
    @DJH316007 3 місяці тому +5

    Why not just circulate the air through vents and do the UV cleaning in the vents?

  • @brianaa96
    @brianaa96 3 місяці тому +1

    I wonder how effective are the hand held wands people use to disinfect and does the light really have to be constant like those shown in the schools

  • @rubysresource
    @rubysresource 3 місяці тому +1

    This is why I have a set of Nukit Torch Far-UVC Lights as part of my mitigation toolkit, along with my Aranet4 and comfortable Trident valved P2 masks.
    Having multiple layers of protection and real time air quality measurements at my disposal gives me flexibility and lets me make informed decisions about how I want to manage risk in different circumstances.

  • @ErmiusJillian
    @ErmiusJillian 3 місяці тому +22

    fellas, it's better to take a bath of water than bathe something that literally says "Ultraviolet" light

    • @Karlach_
      @Karlach_ 3 місяці тому +1

      For now yeah, but the tech is evolving. Once it gets FDA approval you'll start seeing it much more often.

  • @tayloriginals999
    @tayloriginals999 3 місяці тому +3

    I wonder if it could be paired with better air movement and filtration. Put the lights inside the duct work where it won't expose people before improved filtration to filter out the ozone.

    • @FR-oz9px
      @FR-oz9px 3 місяці тому +1

      That’s what probably didn’t fit into this short video and wasn’t promoted by the company they’ve interviewed.
      If you ask scientists, that’s exactly what they’re saying.

  • @blues03
    @blues03 3 місяці тому

    I watch resotoration channels that deal with yellowed plastics. It's nice to see the explanation behind the process.

  • @davidrennie8197
    @davidrennie8197 3 місяці тому +2

    What I'd love for my home: solar-powered device pulling in air from outside, whacking it with UV then HEPA-grade filtering along the route to to pumping it at positive pressure through the house. Toilet output to be UV-irradiated on its way down south - maybe UV light in underside of seat to come on whrn the lid is down.

  • @darkroastordeath
    @darkroastordeath 3 місяці тому +3

    The ICU in my hospital has UV lights in the bathrooms that automatically switch on when no one is inside. Dunno how much good it does (good thing I'm watching this video!) but it's pretty cool

    • @FR-oz9px
      @FR-oz9px 3 місяці тому

      That should be the standard tbh. Toilets were constructed without droplets and aerosols in mind. That’s dangerous in a hospital.

  • @layneburton9172
    @layneburton9172 3 місяці тому +3

    Can any microbiologists expand on the idea of viruses and bacteria mutating to become UV-resistant if the use of the techology expands, similar to the antibiotic crisis we're in today?

  • @robertlivingston360
    @robertlivingston360 3 місяці тому +1

    Most hospitals and public buildings use a lot of stainless steel for commonly touched surfaces, but its not as effective as using copper. Copper just needs more polishing.

  • @stijneke2911
    @stijneke2911 3 місяці тому +2

    Could we maybe stick with scientists explaining the technology, and not salesmen trying to sell their product?

  • @savagepro9060
    @savagepro9060 3 місяці тому +8

    1:21 That UV destruction is too slow. Let me boost it with some toasty nicotine. Yeah baby!

  • @AndSendMe
    @AndSendMe 3 місяці тому +4

    This issue needs to go viral. It should have gone viral at the beginning of the pandemic, when scientists at Columbia had already done the research and if our country still retained anything like a WWII attitude we could have had air cleaners all over the place. Those who got in the way of this should be publicly shamed.

  • @themarcusismael13
    @themarcusismael13 3 місяці тому +1

    Just like in the game dying light where every door to and inside a safe zone has UV light bars. I’ve always wondered what the real world application could be and it turns out it’s not far off.

  • @florianluo8131
    @florianluo8131 3 місяці тому +1

    This was super interesting, I did wonder why its not everywhere, forgot about the cancer risk.
    Here in Hong Kong for example we have UV-projecting disinfectant gadgets above lift buttons and door handles, as well as little machines on escalators that UV disinfect the handrails, hopefully more to come.

  • @maximilianmorse9697
    @maximilianmorse9697 3 місяці тому +5

    It is everywhere, you never heard if the sun?

  • @rsmith02
    @rsmith02 3 місяці тому +4

    I've seen them in HVAC systems which seems like a good use (assuming ozone is being controlled).

  • @micahnguyen8857
    @micahnguyen8857 3 місяці тому +2

    The residential hvac industry has been using this tech since the 90’s.

  • @acid4413
    @acid4413 3 місяці тому +2

    I have lupus so UV light is extremely bad for me and having it everywhere would probably mean death

    • @This_Is_Just_To_Say
      @This_Is_Just_To_Say 3 місяці тому

      How does UV light affect people with lupus differently? (Genuinely asking, have a family member with a chronic condition, so I do know that how people with chronic conditions are affected is frequently overlooked.)

  • @savagepro9060
    @savagepro9060 3 місяці тому +6

    UV . . . Ultra Vox . . . the next branch of a powerful enLIGHTENING UA-cam channel

  • @nawa2396
    @nawa2396 3 місяці тому +3

    imagine if they put them in our screens

  • @Fomites
    @Fomites 3 місяці тому +1

    I have been wondering for several years why this has not been implemented much more widely.

  • @Awakening_Sunshine
    @Awakening_Sunshine 3 місяці тому

    I have a UV box for sanitizing my phone! I also sometimes use it to disinfect cloth masks before washing them

  • @bloop_official
    @bloop_official 3 місяці тому +4

    Vox + Netflix explained + Johnny Harris + Cleo Abram is the best TV routine of all time, and the fact that all of these are related to Vox is mindblowing, the number of subscirbers of Vox are less than the video quality it creates.

    • @no_name4796
      @no_name4796 3 місяці тому

      Fun fact: fow news youtube channel has around the same subs then vox lol

  • @jonahplayscello
    @jonahplayscello 3 місяці тому +2

    Cool

  • @seandonohue6793
    @seandonohue6793 2 місяці тому +1

    In UK hospitals during Covid we had multiple air circulators on each ward near the doors which drew air in at the bottom, passed it through a UV chamber and released the air at the top. These were running constantly, especially in isolation rooms where Covid patients were staying.

    • @cogoid
      @cogoid 2 місяці тому

      In the USSR, short wavelength UV irraddiation was one of the most commonly prescribed procedures. Kindergarten children were getting their throats irradiated a couple of times a week as a prophylaxis during the Cold season. A couple of minutes of 40 W/m^2 broadband radiation from a quartz mercury lamp per session.
      I have no idea whether there were any serious studies of safety and efficacy. Medical textbooks focused on planning how many lamps would be needed for a given facility, just matter of factly assuming that the procedure was an established staple in the medical toolkit. This is almost never discussed in the West, and only now there appear high profile studies of similar techniques based on 222 nm light.

  • @oblio
    @oblio 3 місяці тому +2

    So, this sounds cool, but is this the equivalent of setting the forest on fire when you want to get rid of a few poison ivy plants? Is there anything beneficial in the air that we maybe don't want to wipe out?

  • @MySNova
    @MySNova 3 місяці тому +3

    Good video vox.. good video.

  • @savagepro9060
    @savagepro9060 3 місяці тому +2

    Enter 'Sun' Altman -->> UV-AI

  • @BudzBunny422
    @BudzBunny422 3 місяці тому +2

    I have a UV light phone disinfectant and a UV light toothbrush holder. I love UV I know fast-food and restaurants have UV light in the kitchen

    • @martinweizenacker7129
      @martinweizenacker7129 3 місяці тому

      That's probably not a UV-C light in the restaurant, but UV-B (does not desinfect) and it's purpose is to attract insects to keep them away from the food.

  • @HygienistDentist
    @HygienistDentist 3 місяці тому

    I’d love to have this in treatment rooms in between patients.

  • @sn0tkore
    @sn0tkore 3 місяці тому +11

    This smacks of the whole ultra clean environment issues. Allergies and autoimmune conditions could be tied to growing up in an ultra clean environments. Healthy people that aren't old aren't dying from every day illnesses.
    Maybe this is worthwhile in hospitals and care homes, but this isnt reqired everywhere.

    • @reddragonflyxx657
      @reddragonflyxx657 3 місяці тому

      It's more complicated than that, and still being researched. The level of contamination in our current environments can be harmful too. Doing this in restaurants could easily turn out far more beneficial than harmful, and if we figure out which exposures are beneficial (which is useful regardless of UVGI catching on) it might not be necessary to get them through inhalation.
      We used to drink water contaminated by sewage. That's far worse for public health than our autoimmune disease issue. We haven't tested air treatment at that scale, but it could be a similarly clear net benefit.
      Excerpts from doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700688114
      > Measles and many respiratory diseases proved not to be protective against allergic disease, and, in many cases, even increased the risk
      > “The trouble is, as soon as you use the words ‘hygiene hypothesis,’ the word hygiene prejudges what the cause is,” says Bloomfield. To the public, “hygiene” is interpreted as personal cleanliness: washing hands, keeping food clean and fresh, sanitizing the home. However, because the hypothesis has been largely uncoupled from infections, the idea that we need to be less hygienic is wrong. Relaxing hygiene standards would not reverse the trend but only serve to increase the risks of infectious disease, says Bloomfield. The term “hygiene hypothesis” also fails to incorporate all of the other factors now linked to the increase in immunoregulatory diseases.
      > Early in life is the key: It is likely any intervention will need to be done by 3 or 4 years of age, by which time a child’s microbiome is established and the immune system has completed much of its training.

    • @billcox6791
      @billcox6791 3 місяці тому

      It could also be useful in other places where many people gather: classrooms, offices, stores, restaurants. You don’t know who they might be bringing whatever disease home to, and things like measles and covid are no joke even for healthy populations.
      But, I agree it’s not needed everywhere. At home, it would be both ineffective (more direct means of transmission are much more prevalent) and, as you mention, being too clean has its own issues (in addition to allergies, there are helpful microbes).
      Apply where appropriate, get vaccinated, wash your hands.

  • @benmcreynolds8581
    @benmcreynolds8581 3 місяці тому +3

    I think it would be the best idea to utilize them in public schools and hospitals. They are the top areas where pathogens can really go wild if they are allowed to roam free. It really wouldn't hurt to give this a shot. It's "risks" are pretty tame and manageable compared to most things. They come with benefits. The thing that is probably important is trying to keep people level headed about this new stuff and it's probably not necessary for each household to think they need to invest in their own system.. It's probably better for mass gathering zones

    • @billcox6791
      @billcox6791 3 місяці тому

      Exactly what I was thinking. It doesn’t make much sense in a home setting where more direct transmission is the issue. But, in a classroom or office? Those measles statistics are fantastic for such a simple mitigation!

  • @MichalBrat
    @MichalBrat 18 днів тому

    And now I know how that little box to disinfect my mobile and watch works.

  • @AceChampElite
    @AceChampElite Місяць тому

    I immediately got an ad for some UV light disinfectant product called ‘UVlizer’ lol

  • @Bayn_Lawrence
    @Bayn_Lawrence 3 місяці тому +3

    Go out side its literally everywhere 😅

  • @savagepro9060
    @savagepro9060 3 місяці тому +2

    Ultra VIOLET rays . . . violet alone resonates 'funeral colour!'

  • @jop4112
    @jop4112 3 місяці тому

    This makes me worried about overuse just like antibiotics. This UV light probably can't discriminate between "good" and "bad" bacteria, viruses, etc.

  • @ZennExile
    @ZennExile 3 місяці тому +1

    It is everywhere it needs to be. Problem is, it kills EVERYTHING, and destroys common materials. Not just viruses. UV radiation is bad news for cellular function too. You can print skin cancer with a UV pen on human skin just as quickly as you can draw a semi-detailed sketch.

  • @yalejosie
    @yalejosie 3 місяці тому +1

    As someone with Long Covid, I would jump for joy if these were everywhere!!! If this alone could decrease the chance of disease by 85%, IMAGINE how amazing it would be paired with HVACs!!!! I would be able to go out and be a person again...

    • @user-nt2uw5vi7o
      @user-nt2uw5vi7o 3 місяці тому

      Im so sorry you've had to go through long covid, ik it must be hard :/ One day i wanna be a scientist and study these types of conditions and diseases.

    • @yalejosie
      @yalejosie 3 місяці тому

      @@user-nt2uw5vi7o I really, really appreciate it. Things are easier now than they even were a year ago because people now know what the condition is, and want to help. That emotional support means the absolute world to us

  • @vivi_t3ch
    @vivi_t3ch 3 місяці тому +1

    airports would be another great place to have these, help slow down or even stop diseases from spreading as fast.

    • @LazzieMazzie
      @LazzieMazzie 3 місяці тому

      but until we create UV light that doesn't create humans to have cancer we won't be having UV lights everywhere we go

  • @ChonyiR
    @ChonyiR 3 місяці тому +1

    Went down the far-uv rabbit hole during Covid.
    Reputable far-uv bulbs are still way too expensive. Wish there was more awareness, studies, and money going towards manufacturing.

  • @volpedo2000
    @volpedo2000 3 місяці тому +1

    Interesting in certain applications and environments. I did find the tone condescending at times.