Full podcast episode: ua-cam.com/video/Osh0-J3T2nY/v-deo.html Lex Fridman podcast channel: ua-cam.com/users/lexfridman Guest bio: Edward Frenkel is a mathematician at UC Berkeley working on the interface of mathematics and quantum physics. He is the author of Love and Math: The Heart of Hidden Reality.
I find it fascinating historically that the "halting problem" of Turing comes from David Hilbert's Entscheidungsproblem ("Decision Problem"). It is the same David Hilbert who raced Albert Einstein on the creation of General Relativity!
All very smart people. I wish there were more of them like that today; racing to find out things about the world with a real, genuine interest - not just in being a know-it-all or who can one-up another in a debate.
The Halting Problem, Goedel’s Incompleteness Theorem, Russels Paradox, etc, are essentially all variations of the fact that any observer necessarily becomes its own blind spot.
Does the game of life have simple rules though? Having an infinitely large chess board and a step by step process that can instantly affect all infinitely squares seems like a pretty complex rule to begin with.
@5:40 might be we can define new class which can say it have both of these yeah that sure this class have lot of noise but still do our work so in that sense paradoxical in it self is a category which we can take in a different way to tackle rather taking conventional approach like any problem Halting or similar problem I'm just blathering it might not be true but still can lead some idea.
It makes me sad that all those scientist have left Russia. There is so much Russian spirit and Russian education on them,expect for Lex,he is more American than Russian.I try to find smth Russian on him but mostly I can't. Rarely I can catch à glimpse of it.
Lex the answer to the problem is they have all of these paradoxes because science is only looking at physical science and math, math is only one language we explain the universe with we already know the answer but everyone has been brainwashed you know this that's why you are who you are you didn't drink all the cool aid. Everything takes two things to exist then a thing to observe those two things but it also needs two things to exist to observe it observing the first two things so once scientist figure out the language of the things observing and being observed we can tell them they are being obversed by us and then the infinity loop of creation is born then paradoxes cease to exist but I think we only have two of the languages so far and I'm afraid like our ancestors we didnt.get smart enough fast enough in the right way to figure it out before there's a planet reset ugh getting off planet doesn't solve the problem just creates more variables and times
Full podcast episode: ua-cam.com/video/Osh0-J3T2nY/v-deo.html
Lex Fridman podcast channel: ua-cam.com/users/lexfridman
Guest bio: Edward Frenkel is a mathematician at UC Berkeley working on the interface of mathematics and quantum physics. He is the author of Love and Math: The Heart of Hidden Reality.
I find it fascinating historically that the "halting problem" of Turing comes from David Hilbert's Entscheidungsproblem ("Decision Problem"). It is the same David Hilbert who raced Albert Einstein on the creation of General Relativity!
All very smart people. I wish there were more of them like that today; racing to find out things about the world with a real, genuine interest - not just in being a know-it-all or who can one-up another in a debate.
yes/no
and the British daughter of Lord Byron? She came with the 1st computing, bla, bla, blis binary yes/no.
OMG! This man is so smart.I can listen to him talk for hours and he has such a beautiful acent.
So what Turin's halting problem?
"Not a bug, it's a feature" - Life's mantra for embracing the imperfections. 🐞
The Halting Problem, Goedel’s Incompleteness Theorem, Russels Paradox, etc, are essentially all variations of the fact that any observer necessarily becomes its own blind spot.
Excellent clip super simple brilliance
but when you stop your gaze , it's either a duck or a rabbit ... but not both ... positon , speed ... time, space ^^
Does the game of life have simple rules though?
Having an infinitely large chess board and a step by step process that can instantly affect all infinitely squares seems like a pretty complex rule to begin with.
Ambiguity in neural networks is not that new. Language tasks are full of inherent ambiguity
What happened within them two minutes?
@@soaked189 What do you mean?
Thanks for the awesome content Lex, keep it up man and don't let the haters get yeh down!
@5:40 might be we can define new class which can say it have both of these yeah that sure this class have lot of noise but still do our work so in that sense paradoxical in it self is a category which we can take in a different way to tackle rather taking conventional approach like any problem Halting or similar problem I'm just blathering it might not be true but still can lead some idea.
It makes me sad that all those scientist have left Russia. There is so much Russian spirit and Russian education on them,expect for Lex,he is more American than Russian.I try to find smth Russian on him but mostly I can't. Rarely I can catch à glimpse of it.
Russia as government is rotten to the core. Why would any smart person stay?
Lex the answer to the problem is they have all of these paradoxes because science is only looking at physical science and math, math is only one language we explain the universe with we already know the answer but everyone has been brainwashed you know this that's why you are who you are you didn't drink all the cool aid. Everything takes two things to exist then a thing to observe those two things but it also needs two things to exist to observe it observing the first two things so once scientist figure out the language of the things observing and being observed we can tell them they are being obversed by us and then the infinity loop of creation is born then paradoxes cease to exist but I think we only have two of the languages so far and I'm afraid like our ancestors we didnt.get smart enough fast enough in the right way to figure it out before there's a planet reset ugh getting off planet doesn't solve the problem just creates more variables and times
Ambiguity in neural networks is actually nothing new. Language tasks are full of ambiguity