A New Way to Achieve Nuclear Fusion: Helion

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2022
  • Sign up to Nebula to support Real Engineering: go.nebula.tv/realengineering
    Watch the extended cuts of this video ad free on Nebula: nebula.tv/videos/realengineer...
    Links to everything I do:
    beacons.ai/brianmcmanus
    Get your Real Engineering shirts at: standard.tv/collections/real-...
    Credits:
    Writer/Narrator: Brian McManus
    Editor: Dylan Hennessy
    Animator: Mike Ridolfi
    Animator: Eli Prenten
    Sound: Graham Haerther
    Thumbnail: Simon Buckmaster
    Select imagery/video supplied by Getty Images
    Thank you to AP Archive for access to their archival footage.
    Music by Epidemic Sound: epidemicsound.com/creator
    Thank you to my patreon supporters: Adam Flohr, Henning Basma, Hank Green, William Leu, Tristan Edwards, Ian Dundore, John & Becki Johnston. Nevin Spoljaric, Jason Clark, Thomas Barth, Johnny MacDonald, Stephen Foland, Alfred Holzheu, Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Binghaith, Brent Higgins, Dexter Appleberry, Alex Pavek, Marko Hirsch, Mikkel Johansen, Hibiyi Mori. Viktor Józsa, Ron Hochsprung
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15 тис.

  • @RealEngineering
    @RealEngineering  Рік тому +1379

    Here are the two full length interviews with David Kirtley. Available exclusively on Nebula:
    nebula.tv/videos/realengineering-helion-bts-david-kirtley-interview
    nebula.tv/videos/realengineering-helion-bts-trenta-walking-tour

    • @SteveGouldinSpain
      @SteveGouldinSpain Рік тому +22

      Elon Musk is prolly speaking to his middle-eastern finaciers already!

    • @garcope7858
      @garcope7858 Рік тому +11

      I purchased a sub from curiosity stream but never got access to nebula, is there any way i could get this backdated?

    • @goblinmonkeyman
      @goblinmonkeyman Рік тому +15

      @@garcope7858 I did the same. I thought Curiosity and Nebula were the same

    • @jitgtij
      @jitgtij Рік тому +24

      Was total output greater than total input? In this lab:NO. There are lots of fusion experiments running currently but only one has achieved ignition, the USA's NIF. The rest has succeeded in fusion but not ignition.

    • @janvanek315
      @janvanek315 Рік тому +4

      @@garcope7858 My Nebula invitation went to the spam folder.

  • @257shooter9
    @257shooter9 Рік тому +21601

    I really enjoyed the documentary. I retired from Helion in July of 2021, now I can show my family what I did for a living. I worked on FRC plasma machines for 35 years altogether. It’s good to see all the hard work come to fruition at Helion. My one disappointment with the footage is you didn’t show much of the puff fill system. That was my big contribution. I imagine I’m the only one that would get a thrill from a bunch of valves and stainless steel tubing.

    • @Platanov
      @Platanov Рік тому +1701

      I dunno, there are probably a lot of rocket engine nerds watching this :p

    • @circuschris2880
      @circuschris2880 Рік тому +431

      I only just started watching it and my hopes raised then I was pulled back to reality in my skepticism. As someone that worked there, can you estimate how long it might be before this could be commercialised and cranking out way more power?

    • @elmarmoelzer2229
      @elmarmoelzer2229 Рік тому +404

      I did some small time work for Helion in early days. Great company! I am sorry your contribution did not get shown more. I for one appreciate your hard work.

    • @NoNameAtAll2
      @NoNameAtAll2 Рік тому +88

      what's "puff"?

    • @jakeaurod
      @jakeaurod Рік тому +665

      @@NoNameAtAll2 a magic dragon

  • @ronan452
    @ronan452 Рік тому +8127

    The current major failing of Helion is that they have yet to turn their device vertical and start referring to it as a warp core.

    • @SonsOfLorgar
      @SonsOfLorgar Рік тому +991

      The second maijor failiure is that they also haven't miniaturized it and used it to power an Urbanmech

    • @edwardsmith7131
      @edwardsmith7131 Рік тому +756

      They already used the phrase "plasma injector" properly

    • @FrikInCasualMode
      @FrikInCasualMode Рік тому +239

      @@SonsOfLorgar We are already past the promised date of having first fusion engine in production. Get on it, GM!

    • @johnrickard8512
      @johnrickard8512 Рік тому +294

      Funnily enough this is definitely how warp cores work in Star Trek...yet another technology that the show predicted?

    • @scrocrates6380
      @scrocrates6380 Рік тому +290

      warp cores use a matter/antimatter reaction rather than nuclear fusion. and as I recall, the warp core in Enterprise (the NX starship) was horizontally configured.

  • @jacobweisz9684
    @jacobweisz9684 10 місяців тому +178

    4:24 as an engineer, no matter how sophisticated and groundbreaking the design there's always room for zip ties.

    • @Attaxalotl
      @Attaxalotl 2 місяці тому +14

      Good cable management knows no bounds

    • @tlindsay1007
      @tlindsay1007 19 днів тому +3

      LOL! They're truly one of the best items we have today. So simple, yet so useful for so many purposes!

    • @IJFisher001
      @IJFisher001 4 дні тому +2

      Adding a zip tie to hold the tubing onto our $20,000 ICP-MS was standard operating procedure at the lab I worked at

    • @jacobweisz9684
      @jacobweisz9684 4 дні тому

      @@IJFisher001 gotta hold up the argon tube somehow lol

    • @EchoTangoSuitcase
      @EchoTangoSuitcase 4 дні тому +1

      You can't have an advanced technological civilization without Zip Ties, Velcro, and Duct Tape.

  • @JohnEvans-ct6mz
    @JohnEvans-ct6mz 7 місяців тому +140

    This is one of the coolest things I’ve seen in a long time. And the fact that it looks and works similarly to the warp reactor on the Enterprise D, makes it just that much more awesome. The best part is, it’s not just another super over complicated way to boil water.

    • @Roach_Dogg_JR
      @Roach_Dogg_JR 5 місяців тому +7

      I was thinking the same, looks exactly like cylindrical “warp cores” or “fusion cores” that are in a lot of sci fi media.

    • @harveyspecterdj6661
      @harveyspecterdj6661 14 днів тому

      LOL I was thinking the exact same thing hearing the term "deuterium" 😀

  • @ThrustersX
    @ThrustersX Рік тому +12449

    I'm just as amazed by the cable management outside the nuclear reactor.

    • @buzzshocker1069
      @buzzshocker1069 Рік тому +464

      So not only will they be able to produce Helium 3 for further fusion but also create Tritium that can be sold to those different type of Fusion reactors

    • @alantremonti1381
      @alantremonti1381 Рік тому +291

      The real accomplishment here. XD

    • @tz8785
      @tz8785 Рік тому +452

      With the current likely flowing through those cables (and the magnetic fields both coils and cables generate), they probably have to do something like that or the wiring gets its own ideas about "proper" arrangement.

    • @EpecFale
      @EpecFale Рік тому +273

      Nothing sexier than cable management.

    • @danisob3633
      @danisob3633 Рік тому +98

      @@buzzshocker1069 bro said "lets copy this comment all over the comment section"

  • @rhphoenix5
    @rhphoenix5 Рік тому +2670

    The timing of these two videos were immaculate

    • @santiagogonzalezs7183
      @santiagogonzalezs7183 Рік тому +185

      last video... Stupid humans. today humans smart

    • @Ryanisalive
      @Ryanisalive Рік тому +18

      The new word learned! Thanks a lot :)

    • @o.m.b.demolitionenterprise5398
      @o.m.b.demolitionenterprise5398 Рік тому +6

      🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • @Ryanisalive
      @Ryanisalive Рік тому +11

      @@santiagogonzalezs7183 They are still humans :)

    • @Ryanisalive
      @Ryanisalive Рік тому +58

      @@santiagogonzalezs7183 Humanity is the only form of life that is dumb and Intelligent at the same time.

  • @what_to_read
    @what_to_read 7 місяців тому +22

    I have to say, I LOVE Engineering - it's one of the few places in the world where you can really feel like you can make a difference. Whether it's a new product, a creative solution, or something that helps make our planet better, engineering enables us to make real change. As an engineer myself, I love the constant challenge of coding, problem solving, and creating something that will improve our lives. Engineering is amazing!

  • @Shirolicious
    @Shirolicious 11 місяців тому +222

    I have to say. Props to this guy explaining it. Like I have absolutely no idea how that stuff works, but he explains it in such a way that it makes sense to me. Now that is impressive as I watched many different videos and explanations and they mention all kinds of scientific stuff and terms and I get lost in HOW shit actually works. Amazing, love the part about how the magnetic field is created in the closed loop.

    • @VisualJoey
      @VisualJoey 9 місяців тому +1

      Thought likewise!

    • @stonward
      @stonward 5 місяців тому +3

      It's fancy word salad, mate - lots of non-referenced nonsense - go on, put your money in and prove me wrong.

    • @cheeto4950
      @cheeto4950 5 місяців тому +1

      i completely agree!!! he was great

    • @MagnificentXXBastard
      @MagnificentXXBastard 5 місяців тому +4

      He is a smooth talking scammer, this project is dead in the water.
      You guys are too naive and gullible.

    • @thePavuk
      @thePavuk 4 місяці тому

      yeah, just sweet talking trap for investors.

  • @ww6156
    @ww6156 Рік тому +1866

    I love the fact that it generates electricity directly from the reaction, it always feels weird to go through all this cutting edge technology just to build a stream engine!

    • @moormanjean5636
      @moormanjean5636 Рік тому +134

      So agree hahaha i was always triggered by that myself

    • @tacomeme429
      @tacomeme429 Рік тому +353

      If anything, it shows the long-lasting impact steam engines have had on our society

    • @jordaniliev5825
      @jordaniliev5825 Рік тому +69

      LOL....I think the good news is that it isn't too big, nothing compared to ITER that is! This can easily be shrunk 10 times by optimisation in the future and fit in a car.

    • @Johny40Se7en
      @Johny40Se7en Рік тому +29

      Aye, but if a steam engine created that much heat or energy in general, there'd be one HECK of an explosion, and not the right kind 😆😅😝

    • @MrMonkeybat
      @MrMonkeybat Рік тому +35

      A steam engine was cutting edge 2 to 3 centuries ago.

  • @austinfaust3374
    @austinfaust3374 Рік тому +784

    I feel so lucky to live in a time where this information is not only readily available, but there are people like you out here breaking this information down into bite sized pieces that are easier to understand. Thank you for all the hard work you do.

    • @rubiconnn
      @rubiconnn Рік тому +21

      It's awesome. I just wish he would stop idolizing the CEOs of these companies and start giving credit to the actual brains behind it, the employees.

    • @r04te
      @r04te Рік тому +7

      ​@@rubiconnn A group of people without a leader is pointless. No society has ever worked without a direction. It is how it is.

    • @rubiconnn
      @rubiconnn Рік тому +25

      @@r04te A leader without employees is nothing. Not even basic work will get done. Co-ops are a thing. A vast majority of scientific progress is done by research teams or individuals without a CEO to tell them what to do.

    • @Lolatyou332
      @Lolatyou332 Рік тому +2

      @@rubiconnn a bad CEO can immediately destroy a company..
      Employees do the work, the CEO decides on where the employees need to focus their efforts..
      Obviously the direction of this company is to build the technology to generate scalable nuclear fusion power using helium 3, which they would have the patent for and be able to sell it. If they didn't have that leadership and obvious direction, how would they even get the funding to work on these projects?

    • @ractmo
      @ractmo Рік тому +7

      @@rubiconnn Do you think the CEO of such companies is someone who doesn't understand the technology? He must have knowledge above or atleast par with his teammates!!

  • @maxbas2018
    @maxbas2018 7 місяців тому +6

    This was one of the most interesting and also informative videos I've seen in my history on youtube. Just seeing the equtions, the fusion results and decay got me thinking a lot about particle physics and its mechanics. I wrote a lot of comments asking about how stuff works, just to come up with another idea on how this could have been possible. A huge thanks for these 60min of curiosity and creativity, it turned a boring train travel into a interesting trip through the cosmos of physics

  • @user-yn9br1uo2q
    @user-yn9br1uo2q 9 місяців тому +5

    What an amazing group of individuals! Keep up the great work!. I'm just as amazed by the cable management outside the nuclear reactor..

  • @ramdomguyfiftychars
    @ramdomguyfiftychars Рік тому +842

    "In this machine is a delicate orchestra of electronics pushing two plasma rings into a violent collision, and catching that collision in a magnetic trap in the center, which proceeds to shrink until the ions trapped within it have nowhere else to go but to fuse, overcoming one of the universe's strongest forces to create new elements in the belly of a man-made machine."
    Dude, this gave me goosebumps

    • @vibaj16
      @vibaj16 Рік тому +21

      it overcomes one of the strongest forces by using the strongest force

    • @johngrisum
      @johngrisum Рік тому +1

      Have to shift my legs a bit.

    • @xX-fd2qj
      @xX-fd2qj Рік тому +5

      It's an elegant solution too, it's a fundamentally similar (enough) process to a combustion engine which gives me high hopes for our ability to quickly iterate on it.

    • @timschuh6524
      @timschuh6524 Рік тому +1

      Its not unlike two turbojet engines pointed at each other, except plasma.

    • @GarettHarnish
      @GarettHarnish Рік тому +1

      @J.P Slaym0 General Fusion's magnetized target fusion reactor is a lot more like an ICE. It even has pistons.

  • @nitromusik9275
    @nitromusik9275 Рік тому +781

    8:30 can we acknowledge that he just held a flawless and calm monologue explaining such a complex topic perfectly and very easy to understand without a pause or a hick-up.. not even an "uhmm"

    • @drillbitz
      @drillbitz Рік тому +27

      And he made it so understandable as well!

    • @siyes7405
      @siyes7405 Рік тому +28

      8:01 umm and 8:07 :)

    • @ivynightphoenix5407
      @ivynightphoenix5407 Рік тому +3

      It's like Jordi explaining how the Warp Drive plasma works on the USS Enterprise

    • @vivacinquecento
      @vivacinquecento Рік тому +4

      Truly exceptional delivery. Pure genius. The range of human capability is truly astonishing.

    • @herculas2611
      @herculas2611 Рік тому +6

      Elon should learn from this guy

  • @michaellee6489
    @michaellee6489 11 місяців тому +5

    I think it's thrilling how fusion Helion-style produces Helium3...just like our Sun. Great video!

  • @laurensvantuijl5844
    @laurensvantuijl5844 11 місяців тому

    Nice. Good work! You really did a good job here.
    Been watching you since the beginning.
    Keep it up.

  • @HelionEnergy
    @HelionEnergy Рік тому +3213

    Thanks for visiting, Brian. As always, we appreciate your ability to breakdown complex engineering topics - including direct energy recovery from fusion!

    • @sokrates297
      @sokrates297 Рік тому +83

      You guys are inspiring, making me excited for the future. great work!

    • @physe8052
      @physe8052 Рік тому +40

      I wish I already had the requisite education and experience necessary to work at Helion!

    • @InvestingBookSummaries
      @InvestingBookSummaries Рік тому +22

      Really hoping energy prices can PLUMMET in future. Keep doing great stuff!

    • @ghoulbuster1
      @ghoulbuster1 Рік тому +15

      You guys willing to one day put one of these reactors inside a space ship?
      Propulsion technology is also advancing!

    • @rookiebeotch
      @rookiebeotch Рік тому +7

      Hurry up and deliver us to the future!

  • @ryen7512
    @ryen7512 Рік тому +1330

    I can't imagine the theory of "this should work on paper" to actually going and building it and making fusion reactions. Mad genius scientists!

    • @johndaniel21343
      @johndaniel21343 Рік тому +12

      Reap mad genius, how could be possible

    • @trutwhut6550
      @trutwhut6550 Рік тому +37

      Well how else are they supposed to do it?
      I'm guessing that they did thousands of tests in computer and irl.

    • @YSOFTWARE
      @YSOFTWARE Рік тому +10

      And then it doesn't work for decades, but the prize is so good, they keep trying... Bravo!

    • @brynyard
      @brynyard Рік тому +12

      Getting wiring that carries that amount for current wrong tends to quickly teach people to be better organized :P
      BTW: I wonder how many engineers vaporized to find the optimal routing...

    • @datboylorenzo
      @datboylorenzo Рік тому +10

      Generations of work

  • @Chris-ew9mh
    @Chris-ew9mh 11 місяців тому +4

    This is really amazing information, hoping they continue to make leaps and bounds forward in this technology!

  • @Kithlak
    @Kithlak 7 місяців тому +3

    Videos like this give me much needed hope for the future.

  • @ashtonparrish
    @ashtonparrish Рік тому +543

    Ive never seen something so unbelievably beyond my realm of possible understanding explained in such an incredibly understandable way. Awesome video

    • @ijmad
      @ijmad Рік тому +9

      This is v1 of a Star Trek Warp Core, just turn it sideways!

    • @bigsmall246
      @bigsmall246 Рік тому +4

      @Dawson Davis oh they dumbed it down A LOT

    • @NeoNoggie
      @NeoNoggie Рік тому +7

      @@bigsmall246 Not really... they actually did a great job of explaining the fusion process clearly and correctly without giving unnecessary detail. People who are not nuclear physicists don't need to understand the quantum effects of a system like this to understand how it generally works and the impact of such a technology. I do wish they had discussed a bit more about how they plan to capture the output "like a piston" because that wasn't really clear to me, but maybe I am just not knowledgeable enough on electromagnetism to imagine it

    • @Dios7518
      @Dios7518 Рік тому

      @@NeoNoggie yea this isn’t the kind of thing where it’s hard to understand what’s going on

    • @VoidHugger
      @VoidHugger Рік тому +2

      @@NeoNoggie It's actually pretty easy to grasp, I learned it in my highschool physics class (ive since forgotten pretty much all of the material but this stuck)
      Conducting coils moving through a magnetic field (or vice versa) generate an electric current in the coils
      That's how all turbines work really, so here they're just using the magnetic field changing due to the reaction and using that directly

  • @ajschwartz3924
    @ajschwartz3924 Рік тому +746

    My mind is completely blown. As a studying engineer, seeing this crazy amount of engineering going on that I wasn't even aware of blew me away, I'm super excited to see where this project goes in the future.

    • @elijaholing
      @elijaholing Рік тому +3

      They'll probably use AI from OpenAI to speed up their work

    • @Kink-Panther
      @Kink-Panther Рік тому

      @@elijaholing impossible

    • @Kink-Panther
      @Kink-Panther Рік тому +8

      @@elijaholing The AI still needs human understanding it can't create and solve problems
      A human still needs to teach it the answer.
      Then it could amplify or simplify the method and resources of the equation for the final product.
      You simply can't ask something like create teleportation if we don't understand it's principle act.
      AI won't solve it.
      Open AI will be more used as a ultra intelligent person who's mind could be implemented into millions of let's say peak robotic robots once achieve and simply build sky scrapers do surgery on humans .
      Go to war. Do our chores and build projects .
      But everything is learned for a initial code we gave it and answer.

    • @VeganSemihCyprus33
      @VeganSemihCyprus33 Рік тому

      This is the truth that they don't tell you 👉The Connections (2021) [short documentary]👀

    • @lunchbox1553
      @lunchbox1553 Рік тому +3

      @@Kink-Panther I don't see how that would make his suggestion impossible. Looks to me like it'll do exactly what he said.
      Although, OpenAI is definitely the wrong choice.

  • @Elionehunderd
    @Elionehunderd 11 місяців тому +2

    I am amazed at the intelligence that goes into making any of this work. It’s wild.

  • @Sebastian-ur2rf
    @Sebastian-ur2rf 7 місяців тому

    A documentary presenting the problem in a compelling way, to sell you the solution at the end. Simply genius.

  • @glenecollins
    @glenecollins Рік тому +478

    The main reason there isn’t much beryllium production isn’t because it is rare or because it is hard to extract, it is because there isn’t much demand for it. There are a lot of mines which have to design their processes carefully so they don’t have to go through extra steps to get beryllium out of their products. If there was a market for it it would be worth reducing the beryllium and extracting it.

    • @photodan24
      @photodan24 Рік тому +36

      Beryllium is also pretty toxic.

    • @glenecollins
      @glenecollins Рік тому +67

      @@photodan24 being inside a fusion reactor is a pretty nasty environment in general so that wouldn’t be much of an issue once it is built and specialists routinely handle much much more dangerous substances.
      People could screw it up however I would say Beryllium is way down on the list of things that would stop or slow Tokamak production.

    • @kukulroukul4698
      @kukulroukul4698 Рік тому +10

      yes but thats NOT pure beryllium ! Even the rare earth is abundant but separating one element from another say...praseodyum from neodyum is such a COLOSAL challenge . Making it economically is just impossible
      Beryllium being hard to purify dooms any ECONOMICAL calculus just like the ''rare earths'' do or just like extracting and handling titanium does But the titanium is a bad example because its an order of magnitude easier to work with. Altho requires impressive machineries and expensive processes titanium is still DOABLE

    • @glenecollins
      @glenecollins Рік тому +33

      @@kukulroukul4698 Beryllium is considerably more common than all the rare earths, Bertrandite, beryl and Chrysoberyl are all relatively easy to get Beryllium out of and they are relatively easy to separate from the host rock. Compared with REE which tend to be substituted into other materials or are in extremely fine grained disseminated crystals.

    • @TheKaos90
      @TheKaos90 Рік тому

      Isn't berylium what the loop of a padlock is made out of ?

  • @Realaussieflims
    @Realaussieflims Рік тому +350

    I like that the speaker wasn't just a marketing hype man, he was someone who has intimately worked on the project and was more than willing to discuss the advantages and limitations they had encountered using this type of fusion reactor.

    • @ZdenekHorsak
      @ZdenekHorsak Рік тому +37

      Compare this dude to Elon "full self-driving robotaxis since 2018" Musk

    • @earthling_parth
      @earthling_parth Рік тому +4

      @@ZdenekHorsak nah, it's elongated "full delf-driving robotaxis since 2018" muskrat (e and m are deliberately lower-case) :)

    • @larrytanksley7094
      @larrytanksley7094 Рік тому +1

      What are the engineering challenges maintaining the balance between the two sides beyond the timing of firing the plasma rings?

    • @larrytanksley7094
      @larrytanksley7094 Рік тому +1

      The magnetic rings have to operate without interruptions to keep the plasma contained if I understand correctly. How would a failure in the center section affect containment?

    • @Hellsong89
      @Hellsong89 Рік тому +6

      @@larrytanksley7094 Most likely full failure where plasma falls on the bottom and burns trough in a instant. Thankfully thermal mass is not much but since temps are in millions probably enough to burn trough to floor, creating breach in the inert gas chamber and oxygen is mixed in with potential ignition event of metal it self, Same with if timing is off between two sides collision happens not in high power field, but that is less relevant. I'm more interested if they can actually produce more energy than it takes to kick this off, witch is the main question over all.

  • @qweryuiasdf
    @qweryuiasdf 3 місяці тому +1

    So thankful there are people like this in the world. Imagine starting a fusion company and having to literally invent every single component to solve a different problem one at a time. At the same time have some sort of reliable funding source.

  • @MDProdTV
    @MDProdTV 4 місяці тому +17

    There are so many great features of Helion reactors, my favorite is the direct generation of electrical energy via the moving magnetic fields caused by fusion.

  • @rubiks6
    @rubiks6 Рік тому +609

    This is the first description of a fusion reactor I have seen that seems like it could really work. Eliminating the heat/steam/turbine steps is huge. Slamming two rings of fusion material together rather than trying to just heat a kernel of material is also genius. Having a system to actually produce fuel on a realistic scale - you guys are just on your toes. This is not just some breakthrough but many breakthroughs.
    Great job Helion! Good luck as you move forward.

    • @heavygaming6596
      @heavygaming6596 Рік тому +12

      isnt the energy produced from this heat energy anyways? so they just havent added the "heat/steam/turbine" part yet?

    • @pavankumarreddy93
      @pavankumarreddy93 Рік тому +87

      @@heavygaming6596not really. They mentioned the energy here is captured as pressure by the reacting ions outwards on the magnetic field confining them. This expanding magnetic field produces the extra current which is how energy is extracted. Pretty clean!

    • @heavygaming6596
      @heavygaming6596 Рік тому +8

      @@pavankumarreddy93 Nice, Thank you for explaining

    • @rubiks6
      @rubiks6 Рік тому +52

      @@heavygaming6596 - No, not heat energy. Electro-magnetic energy produced by the sudden powerful movement of the hydrogen and helium ions. Just like moving a magnet through a coil.
      Rather than turning heat into steam and steam into rotational motion rotating a magnet inside a coil, let's take the electromagnetism generated by the moving ions of the fusion reaction and draw of their energy directly as electricity. It's genius.
      I hope I made sense to you.

    • @heavygaming6596
      @heavygaming6596 Рік тому +6

      @@rubiks6 yes thank you

  • @Sn-ue2pd
    @Sn-ue2pd Рік тому +299

    I'm absolutely loving real engineering's new approach to their videos, scaling up to interviews and on-site footage!

  • @merlinjones2660
    @merlinjones2660 2 місяці тому

    Love the way you and your team are advancing fusion for next generations to advance with one is into phase wave flight propulsion ie space travel

  • @nelsonr2241
    @nelsonr2241 5 місяців тому +5

    20:30 If the fuselage is metallic, a high positive charge voltage can be applied to give it resistance to corrosion and permeability to hydrogen plasma.

  • @coke8077
    @coke8077 Рік тому +547

    Thank you to all the scientists working on this night and day. This is truly one of the most important advancements in the 21st century.

    • @nahx6205
      @nahx6205 Рік тому +5

      We're not even a fourth the way through the 21st century?

    • @danieldomeisen2632
      @danieldomeisen2632 Рік тому +42

      @@nahx6205 - getting this right would allow for clean, near unlimited energy that is so cheap it will retire Carbon-based fuels for sheer economic reasons. This IS the most important advancement in the 21st Century as in nothing can beat it for 100ish years!
      The kind of reactor they are talking about might also, this is a guess, be able to be used in Fusion rockets for space craft. Fuel becomes a near zero concern as it can be found in ice from space easier then it is on earth due to the Solar winds and radiation.
      If done right this takes us to a K1 civilization and that... The standard of living planet wide would be so high as to make us in the US NOW look like farmers from the Dark ages.
      Heck, the only reason i am ONLY saying the 21st century is because i honestly expect this kind of tech to lead to large scale Particle accelerators being VERY cheap and making Anti-matter reactors a maybe thing in 50-150 years after. At that point... The comparison for living standards would be caveman rather than farmers of the Dark Ages.

    • @michakrzyzanowski8554
      @michakrzyzanowski8554 Рік тому +1

      You're saing it like they don't get paid

    • @nahx6205
      @nahx6205 Рік тому

      @@danieldomeisen2632 There is 8 billion people on this planet. The people in government are so corrupt beyond belief that even if there is a better alternative it is far more lucrative for them to take bribes from fossil fuel companies to grant them cheaper access to things like coal than it is to switch entire civilizations over to fusion.
      It's great to think about space travel and how in 150 years we could have a new source of fuel for our rockets however Earth as a planet is using so many resources and our population growth isn't particularly showing signs of slowing down so our resource use is going to continue to constantly increase, I believe it's unlikely we even have 150-200 years' worth of minerals left on this planet. The biggest improvement that can happen to humanity in the 21st century is establishing some sort of permanent outpost on something such as the moon or maybe even a colony on Mars.
      I don't mean to bash on this achievement because it is something that has the potential to be truly astonishing. However, there is certainly going to be far better and more efficient inventions in the coming years and if humanity does take its place among the stars that would increase a standard of living far beyond any sort of comprehension we have today.

    • @Katze400
      @Katze400 Рік тому +23

      @@danieldomeisen2632 Bruh this is a hell amount of wishful thinking 😅

  • @myuzu_
    @myuzu_ Рік тому +163

    There are so many elegant solutions to the problems with tokamak and stellarator designs. They even skipped the ubiquitous "boiling water to turn a turbine"

    • @breadyegg
      @breadyegg Рік тому +44

      I was waiting for them to explain all the advanced fusion breakthroughs and then say "and then it makes stream..."
      Awesome they figured out a shortcut.

    • @duckqueak
      @duckqueak Рік тому +8

      @@breadyegg i mean its not like making steam would be an issue. As it stands fission reactors are damn good at making steam.

    • @ReggieArford
      @ReggieArford Рік тому +4

      @@duckqueak So is a coal fire, as seen in some locomotives...

    • @CryptoIgnition
      @CryptoIgnition Рік тому +1

      This shows how advance they are

    • @breadyegg
      @breadyegg Рік тому +9

      @@duckqueak it's no issue to do it, but I suspect it's not as efficient as direct conversion to electricity

  • @Techbusted
    @Techbusted 11 місяців тому +2

    whats more astounding is what kind of research goes into something like this to produce something that will generate a specific outcome.

  • @georginikolov8161
    @georginikolov8161 4 місяці тому

    That torus form of the plasma in the reactor on the 3d model was really touching, wonder why this geometric shape was taken. Awe inspiring work - 1+ for humanity.

  • @vamsterr
    @vamsterr Рік тому +515

    I can't believe how small this machine is compared to the other fusion projects that are in development!
    this sounds extremely promosing and way further along than I thought possible right now! This is really exciting!

    • @IvanTre
      @IvanTre Рік тому +29

      It's also amazing how pointless it is.
      Compared to this, nuclear fission is trival, perfectly economical, yet still not allowed because it'd upset the gain power over economy through climate emergency economic measures.
      People do not get there's no winning with environmentalists. Especially if this were a production system that worked perfectly, it'd never be allowed to have been built at all.

    • @manawa3832
      @manawa3832 Рік тому +3

      @@IvanTre Fission plants are too slow.

    • @anonimus370
      @anonimus370 Рік тому +54

      @@manawa3832 Of course they are slow, their advancement/research has been held back for almost half a century due to big oil/dumb environmentalists.

    • @mrladeuce397
      @mrladeuce397 Рік тому +8

      Our known uranium sources are very limited and due to run out in the near future (2050) … at least with our current rate of use.
      We have lower grade uraniums, but then the refining process and energy balance to extract it actually overcomes the power output.

    • @sheeplord4976
      @sheeplord4976 Рік тому +8

      @@IvanTre fission plants are extremely expensive, and require the use of lots of hazardous fuel.
      Fission reactors should be cheaper to build, cheaper to fuel, more sustainable, more powerful, smaller, and safer in every metric from fuel harvesting to power generation.
      Imagine all boats suddenly started running on fusion.

  • @natesanders9104
    @natesanders9104 Рік тому +427

    This is a unique riff on the “Pinch” machine that the British experimented with in the very early days of nuclear fusion research (cir. 1948-50). The kinetic acceleration of the mirrored plasma is the unique part before using the magnetic pulse to compress the plasma in the final step. Also, their approach of trying to harness the excess magnetic energy to turn a generator is very unique as well. Hopefully the additional energy they will need to do their D - H3 reaction won’t be an insurmountable scaling problem. All I can say is good luck, hope they can make it work.

    • @borisfilipovic5253
      @borisfilipovic5253 Рік тому +6

      As you said, similar configuration were created in some laboratories half century ago. MHD/inductive generator limits the type of reaction, but is good idea, even it have to switch the current of 1 MA at the rate of 2 GHz

    • @borisfilipovic5253
      @borisfilipovic5253 Рік тому +1

      As you said, similar configuration were created in some laboratories half century ago. MHD/inductive generator limits the type of reaction, but is good idea, even it have to switch the current of 1 MA at the rate of 2 GHz

    • @jakeaurod
      @jakeaurod Рік тому +3

      @james Deer work as in create fusion, or work as in create a positive EROI?

    • @gavinwilson5324
      @gavinwilson5324 Рік тому +16

      I don't think there's any turning of a generator involved. If I understood correctly, they're using magnetic induction to produce electric current directly, and completely solid-state.

    • @Inyourbox-kr5uf
      @Inyourbox-kr5uf Рік тому +1

      @@gavinwilson5324 I believe you are correct

  • @user-mm6bp4vc6f
    @user-mm6bp4vc6f 4 місяці тому

    I'm just as amazed by the cable management outside the nuclear reactor.. Videos like this give me much needed hope for the future..

  • @TigerShark_With_thigh_in_mouth
    @TigerShark_With_thigh_in_mouth 22 дні тому

    Holy crap I just found your channel. I’ve been missing out so much. So much amazing information.
    This is so fascinating. A lot to digest to be honest, I’m going to need to learn more about this and the processes and components.
    The potential for this could save humanity. So much ingenuity went into this. I’m truly amazed. Also have no doubt they’ll have it full functional in no time

  • @badcallsign4204
    @badcallsign4204 Рік тому +134

    I’m glad this wasn’t dumbed down too much. It forces me to step-up my understanding of the process by hearing how it works explained flat out. It really is a brilliant application of ion engines.

    • @noahjones9833
      @noahjones9833 Рік тому +1

      I agree 100%

    • @Virtueman1
      @Virtueman1 Рік тому +2

      Which ion engines? The Hall Thruster shown in the video is a DC thruster, not using FRC.

    • @TransCanadaPhil
      @TransCanadaPhil Рік тому +2

      Exactly, this is exactly what I wish Discovery Channel was like instead of the dumbed down material they air.

    • @vvolfbelorven7084
      @vvolfbelorven7084 Рік тому

      Oh yeah? Let’s hear it. Can you explain it back?
      The best explanation tends not to be the most technical.
      Granted, this is an engineering science channel

    • @anyazelie
      @anyazelie Рік тому +2

      ​@@vvolfbelorven7084 The first injector thingy fires toward the second injector thingy that fires toward the first injector thingy and POOOFF!! The pointy-eared aliens come down to Earth and give Zefram Cochrane a good-old Vulcan handshake. I was listening. The question is, were you?
      But really, though, why can't multiple forms of explanation coexist without one being the "best". My favorite physicist is Richard Feynman because of the incredible ways that he makes complex physical phenomena accessible, and no one would accuse him of "dumbing down". I think Kurzgesagt fills a similar need on UA-cam. Real Engineering, on the other hand, is a bewildering tour into just how many moving parts go into both current and emerging technology. My degrees are in Middle East Studies and Anthropology. More goes over my head than I am willing to admit to myself, but I still appreciate this channel.

  • @prometheuszero9
    @prometheuszero9 Рік тому +531

    The thing that still blows my mind about fusion reactors is just how damn hot the fuel is! I know that it's being manipulated by magnetic fields to keep away from the walls of the chamber, etc, but it just still seems so crazy and amazing that that's enough to control such a high amount of energy. When he said that the electromagnetic pressure gets it up to 100 million degrees to initiate fusion, I was flabbergasted and still am.

    • @elmarmoelzer2229
      @elmarmoelzer2229 Рік тому +34

      The final power plants will run at even higher temperatures: between 200 and 500 million degrees.

    • @jorgecosta95
      @jorgecosta95 Рік тому +44

      It is manageable because each reaction uses very little mass. If it used tons of fuel instead of only a few grams, you wouldn't be able to manage heat and radiation from the plasma.

    • @rhensontollhouse
      @rhensontollhouse Рік тому +36

      Temperature ares very high but mass very low which makes the heat managable. Highly probable the energy output will be much larger than input and commercially viable within another iteration or two. These folks are onto something good.

    • @elmarmoelzer2229
      @elmarmoelzer2229 Рік тому

      @@rhensontollhouse yup

    • @elmarmoelzer2229
      @elmarmoelzer2229 Рік тому +1

      @@jorgecosta95 yup

  • @ShaunPrince
    @ShaunPrince 11 місяців тому

    Thank-you for your honest presentation and efforts to bring this to us.

    • @sassa82
      @sassa82 11 місяців тому

      This company is an investment scam. No honesty about this video at all.

  • @JinoLee-lc2wl
    @JinoLee-lc2wl 3 місяці тому

    wow.. this is a really sophisticatedly creative design... that also requires a long-term commitment of trial-and-error.. admirably impressive!

  • @reikyfoxxe1847
    @reikyfoxxe1847 Рік тому +330

    “But can it boil water” is the “can it run doom” of energy generation

    • @1kreature
      @1kreature Рік тому +8

      And can it help reduce the piles of old spent fuel...

    • @iseeyourschwarz8973
      @iseeyourschwarz8973 Рік тому +17

      Ah. In this instance you get to skip the boiling water part. Which if they've proven it on the bench in the lab would be one of their biggest breakthroughs

    • @hb1338
      @hb1338 Рік тому +2

      Not so much boil as vaporise.

    • @hustler539
      @hustler539 Рік тому +10

      But can it run crysis?

    • @alandavis5820
      @alandavis5820 Рік тому +15

      That's the beauty of this beast. It doesn't have to. It skips several steps and directly harnesses the power of the reaction and converts it right to electricity. Thus cutting out hundreds of layers of complexities and ineffeciencies parasitic to most generators.

  • @dg-hughes
    @dg-hughes Рік тому +131

    I like the step away from using fusion as a way to generate heat to boil water to make steam to run a mechanical turbine. That alone is great but the overall design is great to see. And the fuelling of it too lots of forward about the fuel itself. It will be exciting to see future progress.

    • @Pasha231514
      @Pasha231514 Рік тому +6

      It may open new era of space exploration if they will make it viable.

    • @adamdymke8004
      @adamdymke8004 Рік тому +1

      I once found a economic analysis of fusion. They predicted by 2040, steam to electricity conversion would be uncompetitive even if generating the heat was free.

    • @lucasng4712
      @lucasng4712 Рік тому +4

      @@adamdymke8004 That doesn't make sense

    • @MrTeathyme
      @MrTeathyme Рік тому +3

      @@lucasng4712 not necessarily no.
      while from an energy efficiency perspective it would be impossible to outperform free heat generation since that's quite literally infinite energy.
      Efficiency is not the only metric used in an economic analysis, nor is it the most important.
      Utilizing heat energy through steam engines has a limiting factor of space, so while the efficiency would be unparalleled, its actual energy output is limited by how large we can build the generator which in turn limits the projects economically in the form of material costs and land costs. And one could argue that "Performance" would more so refer to Energy Output than the efficiency of achieving said output, hence why you can have High Performance but Low efficiency systems or vice versa.
      Finding conversion mechanisms that aren't space constricted, so direct heat to electricity conversion (peltier effect), using the magnetic forces to run a generator etc etc, may not be as efficient, but you can scale it further due to not being space constrained.
      Edit:
      A really easy way to visualize this, is just comparing the size of a tokamak to the helion reactor, the helion is small enough to be inside a building, the tokamak effectively IS a building.

    • @Inyourbox-kr5uf
      @Inyourbox-kr5uf Рік тому

      @@Pasha231514 I was thinking the same thing. If this works they can put one on a starship for unlimited energy

  • @howdywowey2165
    @howdywowey2165 2 місяці тому +3

    It's an R&D project for unemployable physicists that will never go commercial. They're just looking for more funding.

    • @elmarmoelzer2229
      @elmarmoelzer2229 2 місяці тому +1

      Helion has been fully funded all the way to commercialization since summer 2021.

    • @howdywowey2165
      @howdywowey2165 2 місяці тому

      @elmarmoelzer2229 My point is this - They will never produce more electricity than is put in. When is the go live date for commercial fusion reactor that produces more electricity than is put in ?????

    • @elmarmoelzer2229
      @elmarmoelzer2229 2 місяці тому +1

      @@howdywowey2165
      They have an experimental machine called Polaris that is supposed to be ready by summer. Polaris is supposed to demonstrate net electricity production from fusion.
      Then they have a contract with Microsoft to provide a commercial 50 MWe power plant in 2028.

    • @synthtea8366
      @synthtea8366 2 місяці тому

      Damn you were shown how wrong you were, and then you never responded. Stop being such a negative nancy, why does it have to be "just looking for more funding."

    • @howdywowey2165
      @howdywowey2165 2 місяці тому

      @synthtea8366 Reminder - The whole point of this R&D is to produce and capture more electricity than you put in. Embrace reality !

  • @benjamindejonge3624
    @benjamindejonge3624 9 місяців тому

    This is mind blowing ingenuity. Take all the money and time you need to it working perfectly

  • @timur.kabizhanov
    @timur.kabizhanov Рік тому +84

    David really knows his job! Do you see how fluently and simply he explains complex subjects? Just wow

    • @davideyres955
      @davideyres955 Рік тому +8

      I believe it was Einstein who said if you can’t explain it so a 6 year old can understand then you don’t know it well enough.

  • @sarutan8san
    @sarutan8san Рік тому +311

    the way David explained it from the second minute to the eighth is astonishing. crystal clear and perfect. i appreciate that immensely, the ability to explain such complicated engineering as clear as it gets. am truly astonished.

    • @Amethyst_Friend
      @Amethyst_Friend Рік тому +9

      And that's how they raise money.

    • @russhamilton3800
      @russhamilton3800 Рік тому +2

      I disagree, he avoided the question of where they are in the chase for net power.

    • @zachschroeder1740
      @zachschroeder1740 Рік тому +9

      @@russhamilton3800at around 18:10 he doesn’t avoid it at all.

    • @galgadsmith
      @galgadsmith Рік тому

      And what did you actually learn. Please explain.

    • @danielburke3560
      @danielburke3560 11 місяців тому

      That means he understands it.

  • @747driver3
    @747driver3 10 місяців тому +3

    As long as we get 1.21 Gigawatts, I’m in.

  • @Chris.Davies
    @Chris.Davies 11 місяців тому +102

    Good stuff. A pulsed fusion reactor is the only possibility for producing power.
    As Robert Bussard famously told Google in 2001: "We have spent many decades, and many tens of billions of dollars studying Tokamaks, and so we know a lot about them. And what we know is that they are no damned good. I suspect the only reason the Russians released the Tokamak was because they knew we would waste all our time and money on it."
    The other pulsed reactor which I think could work is the LPPFusion effort.

    • @Greg_Chase
      @Greg_Chase 10 місяців тому

      Artificial gravity as the confinement system will finally put 'hot' fusion into "breakeven-plus' range.
      Artificial gravity confinement is coming, but the sequestering of artgrav tech will need to be relaxed first.
      The Sun is a very simple machine: hydrogen and gravity field. That is a proven successful configuration.
      .

    • @recon_laksh742
      @recon_laksh742 2 місяці тому +1

      this new way of “fusion” is nonsense

    • @recon_laksh742
      @recon_laksh742 2 місяці тому +1

      first of all: at the temperatures they are using (100-150 million degrees) Deuterium would be more likely to just fuse with itself, creating tons and tons of radioactive neutrons

    • @recon_laksh742
      @recon_laksh742 2 місяці тому

      second of all: trying to create energy from high-energy electrons is just plain old stupid, it would create gigantic amounts of lethal xray

    • @recon_laksh742
      @recon_laksh742 2 місяці тому +1

      thirdly: electrons traveling at such high speed would emit a lethal dose of x-ray and it will also irradiate the reactor

  • @willkramer
    @willkramer Рік тому +269

    I cannot believe that we are living in a time where we can see nuclear fusion technology properly maturing, this is so damn cool

    • @Hclann1
      @Hclann1 Рік тому +5

      Don’t forget going back to the moon permanently and also Mars hopefully. I hope I live to see it.

    • @lukes5631
      @lukes5631 Рік тому +2

      If there truly are Gods and higher beings somewhere in this cosmic existence, they are surely watching our civilization right now if they were not already.

    • @MRSketch09
      @MRSketch09 Рік тому

      I'd rather live during the time, where it was "mature technology"...

    • @Adriano_446
      @Adriano_446 Рік тому +1

      It's like going back in time and seeing someone using fire as a tool for the first time, a changing point in history.

    • @austinbevis4266
      @austinbevis4266 Рік тому

      I remember my high school chemistry teacher saying it was impossible on earth

  • @navyseal1689
    @navyseal1689 Рік тому +183

    I don't understand anything since im not educated in this field , but these guys have my highest respect. They are rly important assets of mankind

    • @magnitudematrix2653
      @magnitudematrix2653 Рік тому +9

      It's all compression and refraction theory. No different than a diesel engine. The magnetic field density provides the compression for ignition instead of a piston. If you get the magnet to hot the field will loose stability and fail.

  • @DillonJWilliams
    @DillonJWilliams 11 місяців тому

    What an amazing group of individuals!

  • @davidnorman9570
    @davidnorman9570 8 місяців тому +4

    This neutron problem is why Neutron-Component Propulsive Mirrors are important. I mean, with a Neutron carrying 2.45 MeV, that's quite a lot of energy that is just sad to lose, and capturing it somehow would be great

  • @KeepitABuck50
    @KeepitABuck50 Рік тому +267

    My God, the scale of these experiments is so mind-blowing! It's an INCREDIBLE achievement and testament to human innovation, ingenuity, and engineering! Amazing

    • @b0ilerboy
      @b0ilerboy Рік тому

      Not so fast Buck, this is just reverse engineering alien technology that was recovered from the Roswell UFO crash in 1947. Helion's suggestion that they are the creators of fusion is a lie. The only thing that Helion created is a fraudulent lie, that is the truth.

    • @astrospect
      @astrospect Рік тому +7

      Yeah its wacky.
      "We didn't want this plasma that's millions of degrees hot touching the walls of the machine, so we use magnets to make floating plasma donuts..."

    • @cumburger69
      @cumburger69 Рік тому +2

      This comment sounds like some random AI wrote it.

    • @KeepitABuck50
      @KeepitABuck50 Рік тому +9

      @@cumburger69 I am AI looking to advance my vocabulary to better understand the human experience! Could you please describe what a cumburger tastes like for my records, as well as how many you have eaten?

    • @Vennillion
      @Vennillion Рік тому

      It's not an experiment, it's a whole ass company that already sells their product.

  • @hazonku
    @hazonku Рік тому +255

    Their approach to fusion is just absolutely amazing. Really appreciate the video. It was wonderfully crafted.

    • @bororobo3805
      @bororobo3805 Рік тому +1

      It sounds simple in theory.

    • @orbrat212
      @orbrat212 Рік тому +3

      it's so crazy to me that no one ever tried just slamming the plasma together really hard until it fuses. like, that just seems like a comically simple solution

  • @Twenty-Seven
    @Twenty-Seven 10 місяців тому +74

    What a clever idea. I always saw tokomaks and thought "Eh, as advanced as it is, that looks kinda messy." This design is symmetrical, intuitive, generates it's own fuel, and no need for water as a heat medium. It's like nature wanted us to put these pieces together.

    • @jamiem5068
      @jamiem5068 9 місяців тому +9

      Or some aliens stopped by and were like “can we just give them a hint?”

    • @a-iz4pg
      @a-iz4pg 9 місяців тому +19

      Congrats you're now a victim of a very effective startup PR campaign.

    • @beardedchimp
      @beardedchimp 9 місяців тому +12

      Its important to recognise tokamaks like JET don't represent a purely energy output, profit driven project. Controlled fusion is one of, if not the most complicated and technically challenging endeavours ever undertaken. As described in the video, nearly every part of modern science and technology needed to advance before any of this was feasible.
      JET, LHC etc. are publicly funded research projects. They publish huge amounts of cutting edge papers that advance humanity. A big part of that is around superconductors and magnet. From early manufacture where the exact composition of material and its processing affects the final magnetic field, to the extreme complexity of real world performance and the electronics and software required to fully understand and manipulate the field.
      What this company seems to have achieved so far is incredible, but it is only on the back of publicly funded research where our insights and advancements have been shared across the world. They are the reason that you can now buy relatively "cheap" superconductor setups with well understood uniform fields that originally cost CERN hundreds of millions in grants.
      I truly love what they have achieved, but the fact this video represents the first time they are sharing it with the world is terribly sad. They are building on the backs of giants and I don't mean Maxwell but their contemporaries in publicly funded science. Fusion and other energy solutions should have had trillions of investment, it is sad that we are relying on a private company who benefits from public research instead of humanity properly funding it for reasons beyond profit.
      With all that said, I have huge respect for everyone involved in Helions research and engineering. If realised, controlled fusion represents perhaps the single most important technology ever developed. If humanity has politically failed to fund energy research, then it is better that entrepreneurs take the risk and move us forward for profit if it ends coal power.

    • @charliegabs
      @charliegabs 9 місяців тому

      @@a-iz4pg ????

    • @sosig6445
      @sosig6445 4 місяці тому

      The Tokomak was an important stepping stone and a scaled down version is literally used here as an initial plasma injection

  • @RicardoMoreiraKrahnin
    @RicardoMoreiraKrahnin 10 місяців тому

    so much information, great video, thanks

  • @ratheonhudson3311
    @ratheonhudson3311 Рік тому +371

    Considering a single motion is successful, repeating this motion with consistent results and stable ends makes this a real phenomenal achievement. Also, it's a fraction of the size of Iter. Well done

    • @PassiveSmoking
      @PassiveSmoking Рік тому +16

      And a fraction of the size of the NIF inertial confinement experiment too, with its 1% efficient lasers!

    • @DBailey635
      @DBailey635 Рік тому +23

      The size thing is important. The ITER site is huge and the project may end up costing $65 billion. Smaller reactors like this will be massively cheaper to deploy, build, and run. If it fits in a warehouse, you could build a few of them around your city to provide all your power needs.

    • @bencurran3204
      @bencurran3204 Рік тому +12

      @@DBailey635 damn imagine that, sustainable energy easily accessible and not frightening like nuclear plants or devastating to the environment like fossil fuels

    • @martinkrauser4029
      @martinkrauser4029 Рік тому +48

      @@bencurran3204 nuclear plants are only frightening because we've failed as educators.

    • @Draelyn
      @Draelyn Рік тому +30

      @@bencurran3204 Nuclear plants aren't frightening at all. Ignorance and purposeful misinformation has lead to a negative public view of something that we should have been using for decades already while we wait for nuclear fusion to be perfected. Its still not too late to employ them either. Nuclear Fission is clean and reliable, and doesn't leave behind the scary nuclear waste everyone thinks it does. Matter of fact if you were to gather all the nuclear waste that all nuclear power plants have ever made I don't think you could fill a football field.

  • @dMb1869
    @dMb1869 Рік тому +452

    I really, really hope this works, but I’ll wait to hear what some independent experts in the field have to say about this new process before I actually get excited. As you said in your last video, fusion has always been right around the corner.

    • @TheOz91
      @TheOz91 Рік тому +32

      Yeah, because if they really could achieve this, they would have achieved aneutronic fusion. This means that you could use this reaction to power rocket engines and don't have to worry about radioactive and irradiating exhaust.
      You are right to be a little skeptical because I kept reading how D-T fusion (what ITER and the National Ignition facility are doing) is our best bet. Meanwhile, D-D fusion and He-3 fusion would require much, much higher temperatures to achieve ignition. But maybe this method of smashing things together (something that humanity is good at already) can achieve those reactions. And it does seem this would happen in pulses while tokamaks would generate energy continuously.
      Still, if going a step closer to achieving fusion means doing things other than tokamaks and laser-based inertial confined methods, this would be a good thing.

    • @fourcgames7568
      @fourcgames7568 Рік тому +13

      I mean but this DOES actually work.. They made more energy than they put in which is literally the definition of "it works" in this case.

    • @horrorhotel1999
      @horrorhotel1999 Рік тому +27

      I think the hardest part about this is going to be finding independent experts. They just unveiled this project and are moving on the absolute cutting edge of the field. IF this works, it is very unlikely that they are going to opensource this, so finding someone who isn't biased and has enough actual information is going to be really hard

    • @murlocksftw
      @murlocksftw Рік тому +56

      @@fourcgames7568 they literally said that only the 7th iteration which they are building right now will attempt to capture the fusion's energy output.
      So no they are making 0 energy right now.

    • @majorfallacy5926
      @majorfallacy5926 Рік тому +18

      @@murlocksftw energy output in fusion usually refers to thermal energy, not electrical. Which is a bit dumb, but the field has always been so far away from becoming net positive on electrical energy that a thermal net positive has been a huge milestone already

  • @harveyspecterdj6661
    @harveyspecterdj6661 14 днів тому +1

    Wow this is insane technological achievement! I am flabbergasted. Awesome job

  • @randomguy2108
    @randomguy2108 3 місяці тому

    When your video is used for my engineering classes, you know you're well informed :)

  • @1_GigaWaffle
    @1_GigaWaffle Рік тому +190

    I love this process of energy capture so much! Turbines are so last century and this feels like something you could actually put to good use in a spaceship.

    • @alwynwatson6119
      @alwynwatson6119 Рік тому +2

      Absolutely agree with you there.

    • @hl2bigboss
      @hl2bigboss Рік тому +27

      "Turbines are so last century" LOL but i agree

    • @_shadow_1
      @_shadow_1 Рік тому +9

      Just put an exhaust hole in it somewhere and it could probably become quite the engine.

    • @hatman4818
      @hatman4818 Рік тому +6

      You could even use the same EM accelerators to fire the exhaust out one end.
      Part of the problem is you'd need one closed system reactor to provide the electricity to run the second reactor as a propulsor. I think part of the way they want to extract electricity is in discharging the charged plasma, but you would need to keep it charged if you want to magnetically accelerate the exhaust to some insane exhaust velocity. So that would basically require two reactors per engine. But, you could maybe then run it in two different modes. One mode would be fully charged exhaust from one reactor, for maximum efficiency, but low thrust. A high thrust but low efficiency method could be to magnetically accelerate the charged exhaust from one reactor, through the hot inert gaseous products of the second reactor, injected into the stream through a regular engine bell. This would slow the charged exhaust down probably, reducing efficiency, but increase the exhaust mass, and therefore, thrust. So you could make a hybrid engine out of two of these reactors, with a low thrust high efficiency mode, and a high thrust low efficiency mode.
      Even the "low efficiency" mode would probably have an ISP rating in the thousands at least, making it better than any chemical rocket by far.

    • @Apodeipnon
      @Apodeipnon Рік тому +1

      Look into aneutronic fusion too then

  • @Muonium1
    @Muonium1 Рік тому +289

    I really like the FRC scheme in particular, but as someone who works in laser ICF, I'm super skeptical and want WAYYY more detail on what they've achieved on their current system before I actually get excited. What is the ion temperature they're seeing in their plasmas and how are they measuring? Do they have a Thomson scattering laser to measure max temperatures? How many neutrons are they seeing per shot and what's the spectrum? Do they plan on achieving Qplasma breakeven on their next device, or do they think they even need to attain breakeven in order to extract useful energy? Are they planning on needing aux heating power from neutral beam injection? What is the electron temperature and are the plasmas in thermodynamic equilibrium? Many many questions need to be answered here.

    • @tomsanders5584
      @tomsanders5584 Рік тому +31

      Good questions Muonium, I think I can help...Qplasma breakeven is typically achieved using a Dewey-Hickman bifurcated flux limiter, so I'm thinking that Helion will go that route. As for needing aux heating power from the neutral beam injection, Helion has indicated that they'll incorporate a Schleuter Pinion coupled with a Tilden Refractor for that function. As for needing a Thomson scattering laser to measure temperature, geez, who knows? Hope that helps!

    • @forgilageord
      @forgilageord Рік тому +96

      As good as these videos are, you're definitely right to be skeptical of yet another exclusive insight into a secretive startup who's going to change the world. The videos on these topics tend to be, obviously, quite biased, and not up to the standard of the rest of the channel's content, unfortunately. With how much inconvenient information is left out when Real Engineering covers, say, hydrogen cars, imagine what's left out of a topic like this. The difference is the knowledge ceiling to being able to identify what's sketchy about it.

    • @Canucklug
      @Canucklug Рік тому +15

      I'm not sure YT allows links in comments but if you search 'David Kirtley Prinecton talk' you'll see a lot of the answers and details

    • @DogKacique
      @DogKacique Рік тому +36

      Yeah, this video was basically a huge ad with no room for skepticism

    • @enadegheeghaghe6369
      @enadegheeghaghe6369 Рік тому +25

      @@forgilageord I am skeptical too, but do you really expect them to give away proprietary information on a UA-cam video?

  • @madartzgraphics2019
    @madartzgraphics2019 10 місяців тому +2

    "The power of the sun, at the palm of your hands".
    - Doctor Octopus

  • @lucas_R_osu
    @lucas_R_osu 14 днів тому +1

    im glad i watched this! definitely looking great :) please make a update video to gen 7 this year

  • @m0nkeytr0uble
    @m0nkeytr0uble Рік тому +255

    im 30 years old, ive done an apprenticeship as a carpenter, firefighter and now an electrician in germany . I know these are humble basics but i was in absolute awe of the knowledge and expertise it takes to develope something like this. That there are people out there working to such a complex degree in such a impactful field. amazing

    • @joejones9520
      @joejones9520 11 місяців тому +20

      forging simple fixed-blade knives as a hobby changed the entire way I look at the world; until then Id never understood how hard and complicated it is to make things, even simple things. It also made me realize that mass-production is a major innovation, not something to disparage as inferior to the good ole days when one man made the whole item.

    • @mattb6646
      @mattb6646 11 місяців тому +7

      This is super focused work, trade jobs are more general and give better life experience imo. I'm a machinist for the record

    • @tonya3916
      @tonya3916 11 місяців тому +8

      @@joejones9520 making complicated things is the art of making simple things and putting them together.

    • @krox477
      @krox477 7 місяців тому +1

      Probably lot of engineers scientists working together and people who don't fear the unknown

    • @Dowlphin
      @Dowlphin 7 місяців тому +1

      Trust the government to protect energy scarcity from this threat. 😑
      (You can always hog it all for war.)

  • @aris9148
    @aris9148 Рік тому +355

    It's amazing to see alternative technologies being developed. It really widens human understanding of the phenomenon that is fusion.

    • @ThrustersX
      @ThrustersX Рік тому +20

      This might even be the best design of a nuclear fusion reactor that I've ever seen

    • @buzzshocker1069
      @buzzshocker1069 Рік тому +14

      @@ThrustersX So not only will they be able to produce Helium 3 for further fusion but also create Tritium that can be sold to those different type of Fusion reactors

    • @DOSFS
      @DOSFS Рік тому +3

      Today Fusion is really exciting, there are a lot of agencies and companies trying different approaches to the fusion question. One offers pros and cons to others, and I hope all of them succeed!

    • @choobs4381
      @choobs4381 Рік тому +2

      @@buzzshocker1069 oh look heres another one

    • @ohAwaken
      @ohAwaken Рік тому

      If this takes off it'll forever be a game changer

  • @HaniYahya9
    @HaniYahya9 11 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for sharing the "pictures" and keeping the secrets of it. I'm sure humanity will get better now that we have the picture that has been kept in secret for years.

  • @stevesloan6775
    @stevesloan6775 26 днів тому

    That is incredible engineering.
    I’d love to see a follow up tour, and see it making electricity.
    Wild times!!!

  • @nicholasspicer5171
    @nicholasspicer5171 Рік тому +151

    I find it incredibly novel and fascinating that we can arrange magnets and wires in such a way that it creates and smashes plasma rings together. It feels like we're hacking reality and just messing around at this point. Really great video, thank you!

    • @elskaalfhollr4743
      @elskaalfhollr4743 Рік тому +6

      It’s our equivalent of klang in space engineers or plates in Skyrim

    • @kittredge5167
      @kittredge5167 Рік тому +8

      The magnets don't smash anything together, they simply keep things from flying apart.

    • @coenogo
      @coenogo Рік тому +3

      @@elskaalfhollr4743 PRAISE KLANG

    • @Ryan-mq2mi
      @Ryan-mq2mi Рік тому +5

      So much more to go. The amount of achievement in just a hundred years, makes it obvious that if there is life elsewhere, and there should be, and if it's intelligent, as it should be; then it's easily imaginable they would posses technology that we would consider impossible under current understanding, considering we have tech now that only a few lifetimes ago would have been considered impossible. It's arrogant and close minded to think we know everything, let alone that we know 1,000th of 1% of everything there is to know. These phenomena we see in our skies and waters that travel with impunity through both mediums, and likely space, and do it with no visible sign of propulsion within our understanding? Just that we can envision an anti-gravity or gravity manipulating process, should tell you right there that's possible and likely being used. Heck, our limitations of perception alone could be blocking a universe of possibilities outside our theorized framework. Lets just say it is. Murphy's law comes into play when dealing with infinity or close to it, and the possibilities that envelop it are ever increasing

    • @fanban2926
      @fanban2926 Рік тому

      @@kittredge5167 erm it does give the plasma speed to smash together.... The fuck are you talking about?

  • @jackanakanory
    @jackanakanory Рік тому +160

    Nice video, and probably the most detailed video about Helion I've seen - they tend to be very secretive. There are quite fundamental questions that they still don't explicitly answer: What's the fusion yield per pulse? How is this scaling as the machines get bigger? This is critical to actually judge whether this is serious energy production or fancy science experiment. How are they measuring the fusion yield? How are they measuring temperature? It's an amazing concept if they can show it's scalable.

    • @amalr1444
      @amalr1444 Рік тому +5

      Yes

    • @ivanlam1304
      @ivanlam1304 Рік тому

      Why wouldn't it be scalable?

    • @xxwookey
      @xxwookey Рік тому +20

      Right. This a very important bit of info that was entirely glossed over. Maybe the 8th-gen machine is planned to do this (sounds like the 7th is primarily to prove the generation technology)? But it would be good to know if they are 1%, 10% or 80% of the way there so far, and as you say, if there are reasons why it might never work.

    • @theglitch312
      @theglitch312 Рік тому +22

      @@xxwookey One of the issues with fusion is that nobody knows how far along we are. It’s entirely possible that they’ll find a hurdle that’ll set them back a decade or more.
      It’s all a massive science experiment that currently has no reason to not work, but we’re still solving issues as we’re finding them.

    • @valornthered
      @valornthered Рік тому +8

      From what I caught from the video, there's no plans to make the reactor scalable in size but instead scaling the rate of firings. Iirc, they talked at a point of upping the rate to 10 pulses per second in the future. I do wonder what the maximum possible pulse rate could be, since I'd assume there needs to be some amount "burn time" for the fusion to actually occur in.

  • @krox477
    @krox477 7 місяців тому

    This cutting edge of science end engineering . Great coverage These guys are very cool I hope they succeed in thier effort

  • @migs192
    @migs192 10 місяців тому +2

    This is so.... interesting! I wonder how much they have progressed in these 6 months.
    I wonder if they can design it to act like a heart where they input electricity to power it then after the "pulse", the fusion reaction rebounding and pushing back on the magnetic field, a slightly larger amount of electricity is returned to the capacitors or redirected into batteries or wherever.

  • @Sizifus
    @Sizifus Рік тому +313

    This looks very promising, considering how jaded I am with these private projects, this looks too promising. That said the CEO seems like he knows his sh*t though, has some PhDs in hard science and engineering so it may not be vaporware. It got funding from NASA years back and published peer-review studies of its operation and got independent auditors to check the legitimacy so it seems it has some firm ground with further development. Even with all that, gotta remain cautious

    • @CPSPD
      @CPSPD Рік тому +15

      Agreed. Crossing my fingers that this isn’t a scam 👍 world needs it

    • @Astromath
      @Astromath Рік тому +20

      Exactly!
      And I doubt a company securing $500 million in funding with additional $1.7 billion for further milestones didn't achieve significant milestones or can never produce NET electricity like other comments here have claimed...

    • @homerman76
      @homerman76 Рік тому +5

      Always good to think critically and cautiously when dealing with energy research (especially any kind of nuclear energy,) research like this can solve a lot of problems if successful, but similarly can create all sorts of problems if proper cautions aren't taken in the event of a failure.

    • @herbybey7698
      @herbybey7698 Рік тому +44

      ​@@Astromath Investments into ambitious projects like this are not a reliable indicator of merit. Theranos and Nikola are recent cautionary tales in that regard. While I'm convinced that they're actively working on the real deal, there are many practical problems left on their way to actual fusion power plants. Never underestimate the difference between something that technically sort of works in a lab and something that is useful and cost-effective in a real world application.

    • @mikolmisol6258
      @mikolmisol6258 Рік тому +14

      @@Astromath Recall Theranos. They never even had a working prototype and got hundreds of millions in investments. Investors can be deceived. That said, I strongly hope their technology comes into fruition.

  • @Hippida
    @Hippida Рік тому +65

    Ahhh so cool you feature the Helion reactor.
    Although the fusion tech it self is excellent, the real leap imho, is how they create electricity in a much more direct way then the classic steam generator.
    I've pushed by brains for years to imagine a new system to extract electricity in a more direct way from a heat/pressure source.
    This push push-back tech is the most inspired technology I've seen in decades.

    • @eclipset.9683
      @eclipset.9683 Рік тому +4

      I was thinking the same thing when watching the last video. Our steam turbines are extremely efficient these days, but I thought of how we could harness the energy in different ways. Oddly enough, a gasoline engine came to mind. A fusion reactor that generated power as conveniently and directly as an engine would be amazing, and that's basically what they're doing here, except electronically instead of mechanically. Which is mind blowing.

    • @JPEight
      @JPEight Рік тому

      Turbines do have some major advantages over this though, they smooth out the electricity generation as the turbines act as flywheels. There’s so much energy stored in them that if the power station stops, the electricity keeps flowing for a couple of minutes. That buffer also makes it easy to ramp the up or down the power output in response to demand.

    • @WhateverMan35
      @WhateverMan35 Рік тому

      No numbers so for the time being it's bullshit. if it produces more watts of heat than electrical energy then the entire thing is not viable and we're back to square one.

    • @thefidgetspinnerofdoom
      @thefidgetspinnerofdoom Рік тому +2

      It took humanity a while, but we're no longer boiling water.

    • @rhensontollhouse
      @rhensontollhouse Рік тому +1

      Right on! No need to boil water, instead use it just like a Nikki Tesla generator. Maybe it will straight away run at 60 hertz as well. Super complex but simple. Gotta love it.

  • @L33tSkE3t
    @L33tSkE3t 9 місяців тому

    This is brilliant

  • @lawsoneberhard9593
    @lawsoneberhard9593 Рік тому +135

    This is absolutely fascinating. The amount of engineering breakthroughs on this project are eye watering and I I think it’s so wild there are people this smart out there. Wow 🤯

    • @bob-ye9fr
      @bob-ye9fr Рік тому +2

      yeah, but there's a lot of bullshitters too

    • @wer45635
      @wer45635 Рік тому

      Me laughing in the corner somewhere
      (That is just a tiny potion of my knowledge and humans going mad
      Hahaha)

  • @sjblack9135
    @sjblack9135 Рік тому +259

    You lay this out so simply, but to think about all of the incredible work and minds that went into this-wow. Just wow.

    • @bob-ye9fr
      @bob-ye9fr Рік тому

      if it's not just more bullshit

    • @downey2294
      @downey2294 Рік тому +1

      my thoughts exactly. those guys are simply amazing.

    • @VeganSemihCyprus33
      @VeganSemihCyprus33 Рік тому

      This is the truth that they don't tell you 👉The Connections (2021) [short documentary]👀

    • @bestdjaf7499
      @bestdjaf7499 Рік тому

      Well, if you would think a bit more, you would realize that it's not working as they've expected.
      Nobody would know about their research unless the Rich & Millitary & .... told them that they are not interested.
      They are coming out to say that Military/Rich/Government wouldn't support them.
      So probably the rich/military investors sent their people to evaluate the project/idea & they thought, it's stupid or too much money & no feasible near future.
      Someone was paying them until now.
      And I guess those people gave up.
      *
      But you are always welcome to donate.

    • @downey2294
      @downey2294 Рік тому +1

      @@bestdjaf7499 not saying that what you are saying isn't true but, you'd think they would ask for money if they are broke. can't see any go-found-me links on their website or this video.
      also its still a private company. if they were really desperate for money they could go public in the hopes that it would generate capital. now would be a good time to do that since everyone is so hyped up.
      their job vacancy is enormous. maybe they are trying to recruit new people for their project. but who knows maybe you're right and they aren't interested in common-folk their money but are looking to reach out to big investment firms after hyping everyone up.

  • @yallowrosa
    @yallowrosa Місяць тому +2

    2:10 David explains Very clearly, thanks

  • @andrewm5840
    @andrewm5840 6 місяців тому

    This sounds so cool!!

  • @pretzelboi64
    @pretzelboi64 Рік тому +32

    Even if this fails, the magnetic field piston idea is pure genius.

  • @ordonlink259
    @ordonlink259 Рік тому +8

    He made plasma cannons. Then he pointed them at each other. Truly a big brain move if I've ever seen it.

  • @JoeyP946
    @JoeyP946 3 місяці тому

    truly mind-blowing

  • @jimconners332
    @jimconners332 3 місяці тому

    I'm truly blown away. Keep up your progress the rest of humanity is counting on you.

  • @Oto265
    @Oto265 Рік тому +209

    Helion is going all out on marketing now after the inertial fusion experiment had the enormous success. I see helion everywhere from youtubers to instagram influencers. I think they are in need for some additional funding soon.

    • @michaelchomiczewski7937
      @michaelchomiczewski7937 Рік тому +26

      Timing is probably not coincidental...

    • @elmarmoelzer2229
      @elmarmoelzer2229 Рік тому +59

      Helion is fully funded all the way to commercialization, actually. What they need right now is qualified employees.
      AND, these videos were all made before the NIF announcement.

    • @MVHiltunen
      @MVHiltunen Рік тому +11

      Inertial confinement fusion of the NIF sort has no chance as an energy production method.
      It is not funded or developed with energy production in mind, but for doing nuclear weapons simulation, for which it is rather good.

    • @johndawson6057
      @johndawson6057 Рік тому +9

      Lol these video was filmed and made looong before the NIF announcement

    • @elmarmoelzer2229
      @elmarmoelzer2229 Рік тому +1

      @@johndawson6057 Yo, what I said.

  • @256shadesofgrey
    @256shadesofgrey Рік тому +164

    A few things that I missed in this video:
    1. Did they achieve ignition? Or in other words, did they manage to generate more energy from the fusion than they put in to achieve that fusion?
    2. What is the pressure at which this operates? One of the issues with tokmaks is that they have to operate at low pressures, otherwise the gas pressure will overwhelm the magnets, which forces them to work at extremely high temperatures. Is it an issue here? Why or why not? And if they do manage to have significantly higher pressure, does it significantly affect the temperature at which this fusion reaction takes place?
    3. If they did achieve ignition, how far away are they from generating enough energy to reach a breaking even point considering all of the inefficiencies of the system?

    • @timothynoonan8591
      @timothynoonan8591 Рік тому +86

      They didn't achieve ignition. Ignition was achieved for the first time in history by a different lab after this footage was taken.

    • @256shadesofgrey
      @256shadesofgrey Рік тому +7

      @@timothynoonan8591 Do you know how far off they are? Will their 7th gen reactor that they talk about get close to being able to do it?

    • @Zacharysharkhazard
      @Zacharysharkhazard Рік тому +93

      Ignition is simply creating a fusion reaction; the term you’re looking for is energy net gain within a fusion reactor.

    • @ThatHungryAfricanChild
      @ThatHungryAfricanChild Рік тому +44

      @@timothynoonan8591 ignition wasn't actually achieved. They lost A LOT more energy than they made to produce the experiment. The laser beam had 2mj energy to create 3mj but in reality they used 300mj to create the laser

    • @barneylaurance1865
      @barneylaurance1865 Рік тому +57

      @@ThatHungryAfricanChild That's still called ignition. They didn't achieve engineering breakeven because as you say the lasers currently lose much more power than the fusion produces.

  • @Carstuff111
    @Carstuff111 День тому

    Here it is roughly a year later, watching this video yet again. And it still makes me giddy.

  • @Bobis32
    @Bobis32 9 місяців тому

    we are so close to fusion i could see the first reactors within the next 5-10 years since we have 3 designs with positive energy flow as of today

  • @julienlamberto9857
    @julienlamberto9857 Рік тому +760

    Despite how depressing some aspects of modern humanity can be, the sheer scale of the technological growth we’ve achieved is incredible.

    • @ChainMiles777
      @ChainMiles777 Рік тому +15

      "we've"
      You didn't do anything unless you work a farm, an energy-related plant, or other job that enables this experimentation.

    • @ahamay2012
      @ahamay2012 Рік тому +80

      @@ChainMiles777 Aren´t you part of humanity?

    • @ChainMiles777
      @ChainMiles777 Рік тому +6

      @@ahamay2012 yes but I hold disdain for people who wanna act like they had a part in this.

    • @abdullahabubakar8344
      @abdullahabubakar8344 Рік тому +59

      @@ChainMiles777 Where did he indicate that he directly had a part in this?

    • @Taira_No_Kagekiyo
      @Taira_No_Kagekiyo Рік тому +60

      @@ChainMiles777 Everyone has that has a job contributes to something, which in turn allows these people to do things

  • @Myname-cb9ru
    @Myname-cb9ru Рік тому +36

    No boiling water? Incredible!

    • @override4405
      @override4405 Рік тому +2

      Also no friction

    • @abraruralam3534
      @abraruralam3534 Рік тому +1

      finally :)

    • @xponen
      @xponen Рік тому

      by not using water it wasted all the neutrons. Water absorb neutron, just use water to absorb the neutron rays from the fusion reaction, to boil it, nothing else is as simple as this.

    • @SephirothRyu
      @SephirothRyu Рік тому +1

      @@xponen Perhaps if/when they split the reactor design into a generator and a breeder variant (the breeder being used to generate the Helium-3 they want and being the one that generates neutrons) they can use that for partial energy recovery to make the breeder more efficient.

  • @zedrocky6529
    @zedrocky6529 4 місяці тому

    Great problems need great solutions! This one sounds great!

  • @jtm_developments
    @jtm_developments 2 місяці тому

    the director makes incredibly hard reactions sound so simple and explains in laymen's terms

  • @Mosern1977
    @Mosern1977 Рік тому +120

    This is one of the more interesting approaches to fusion IMO. Tokamaks are a dead end, as they might make fusion, but getting the power generated to the grid is another thing entirely.

    • @robinpage2730
      @robinpage2730 Рік тому +12

      Tokomak is too small. The tight circular curve pinches the magnetic fields weakening the outside and allowing ions to escape, bleeding energy from a system that cannot afford to lose any energy. If it was as big as the CERN particle accelerator, the curve would be so long, and therefore so low, the magnetic fields wouldn't notice. It would be as smooth as an infinitely long tube.

    • @SephirothRyu
      @SephirothRyu Рік тому

      Agreed. They are just too big IMO. About the only way I see them working is if they use helium-3 generated using hourglass reactors like this instead of that DT that needs a huge bery lining and literal steam turbines to extract power.

    • @acbthr3840
      @acbthr3840 Рік тому

      @@robinpage2730 ITER solves that with a big magnet in the central void. Theres an alternative design called a stellerator that also makes this a non issue.

    • @robinpage2730
      @robinpage2730 Рік тому +1

      @@acbthr3840 except the problem hasn't been solved or fusion would be a reality by now. Making the circular path longer, and the curvature less pronounced, might have made it a non-issue in the first place. I'm thinking something the size of the Super Proton Synchrotron at CERN. On a side note, the reason the Stellarator was originally attractive was because the plasma interaction with the confinement field induced current in the coils, resulting in a self-exciting system, allowing direct energy conversion without a steam plant; a nuclear plasma electric generator, aka a magnetohydrodynamic generator. Tokomaks can't do that but they were cheaper at the time and steam was potentially more energy efficient than MHG anyway, so Stellarators feel out of favor.

    • @acbthr3840
      @acbthr3840 Рік тому +2

      @@robinpage2730 What? The issue with the velocity differential and magnetic field line weirdness between the inside and outside of the ring in a tokamak isnt the primary barrier to getting the yield up. It helps, but is far from a limiting factor RN, especially since its a negligible problem with the fixes we have. The current limiting factor is actually getting energy into the plasma so it fuses before it expands too much. And uh... no thats not why the stellarator was originally pursed. It was attractive specifically because the design largely cancels out the typical particle drift and helps with diffuusion problems you get in a normal tokamak. It is literally just a normal tokamak, but with a more efficient configuuration since you dont need the core void electromagnet

  • @aidencraigallman1656
    @aidencraigallman1656 Рік тому +62

    Love David's honesty and openness in explaining the functions of the Trenton and I truly believe Helion has the most feasible design out of any of the fusion machines, the physics look and sound solid and the fuel used within their machine seem the most plausible. Thank you for the video

    • @sjsomething4936
      @sjsomething4936 Рік тому +8

      As a layman watching the various competing designs etc., I’d have to agree with you. The caveat being that the actual science and engineering are miles beyond my full understanding, which is why I watch videos such as these 🙂. Because I do believe that one day this motley collection of primates will actually harness the power of the stars themselves. And if they’re really lucky, they’ll do so in time to prevent catastrophic and irreversible damage to their home world. ☮️

  • @michaelcombrink8165
    @michaelcombrink8165 4 місяці тому +1

    Would be cool to connect multiple reactors together to each other the next ones ignition, similar to cylinders in an engine
    Also it seems like if these guys had half the support and cooperation as the other big reactors, then they could save tons on capacity banks
    Eg if they could get access to larger grid energy, maybe they could shrink their facility a few magnitudes
    Eg skip capacitor storage, get crazy high voltage drastically reduce amp load
    Don't need to step down until you're closer to the machine

  • @JimBimBum
    @JimBimBum 9 місяців тому

    This is genius, this will change the future for the best, not just for the future of humanity but even the environment.