Crown Court - Seconds Away (1983)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
  • Police Constable Robert Bowles (Neil Daglish) is charged with deliberately failing to take sufficient steps to prevent an assault on a Mr Ahmed from 3 youths.
    Francis Matthews (star of Captain Scarlet and Paul Temple), John Fortune (Bremner, Bird and Fortune) and John Woodnutt (Doctor Who, Jeeves & Wooster) star.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 95

  • @artemiszeus9735
    @artemiszeus9735 7 років тому +8

    The gorgeous Gerry Sundquist (Steven Gibson). Died 1993. Thanks for uploading. Xxx

    • @susannah1948
      @susannah1948 7 років тому +3

      Artemis Zeus so sad he took his own life

    • @juliemunro1
      @juliemunro1 3 роки тому +2

      Very tragic

  • @robinneher3262
    @robinneher3262 6 років тому +13

    Watching from America. Love this show😀

    • @jezt42
      @jezt42  6 років тому +1

      Glad you’re enjoying CC, Robin! :)

  • @colettemartin4824
    @colettemartin4824 Рік тому +3

    Verdict was a shock as the judge's summing up almost directed the jury for innocence.

  • @arthurvasey
    @arthurvasey 2 роки тому +5

    Prosecuting counsel sounds like Captain Scarlet with a northern accent - good reason - he was the voice of Captain Scarlet - also played Paul Temple on telly at one point!

  • @up4itgal
    @up4itgal 8 років тому +3

    Good stuff. Thanks for uploading.

  • @smithofsmiths1872
    @smithofsmiths1872 3 роки тому +8

    Since the constable had literally no defence other than his own words I thought this was rather a foregone conclusion.
    But the suspense is still there and judging by some of the comments you can never take another man's judgement for granted. People will believe what they want to believe and make the facts fit according to their views. This is why we have conspiracy theorists.

    • @HampsteadOwl
      @HampsteadOwl 2 роки тому +2

      Yes indeed. When your defence relies on the proposition that everyone else is lying, you're in trouble. But why, if he was guilty, did he stick to his story about the situation when he arrived on the scene - since that ended up incriminating him. He could easily have lied and said there were all sorts of people leaning out of windows and shouting when he got there, but he still took the decision to duck into the doorway to radio for help. That would still have put him up against Patel and his eerily accurate time-keeping, but that would have been a more even contest given the latter's record of campaigning against the police. Any other discrepancies in the accounts could have been put down to it being confusing and dark and difficult for people to be precise about what exactly happened when - a better defence than trying to claim it was one big conspiracy.

    • @newforestpixie5297
      @newforestpixie5297 Рік тому

      Would you say that the European trading market being the root of all Britains ‘ woes a Conspiracy Theory ? I could see both sides of the argument which appears to not belong in todays’ world but when I saw or heard many whom gave opinions which many believed were facts it makes be believe how many opinions should be granted Conspiracy Status beyond the Apollo missions being faked or that AIDS or Covid were somehow cooked up & released with intent to create fear & misery ! 😁👍

  • @artemiszeus9735
    @artemiszeus9735 7 років тому +6

    I appreciate people may have trouble placing him so many years later. Gerry S was a fairly big star at the time, having been in The Mallens and Great Expectation. He was also a bit of a poster boy for the teen girls.

  • @artemiszeus9735
    @artemiszeus9735 6 років тому +3

    The sequence between Gerry Sundquist and John Fortune is brilliant.

  • @sarasen8147
    @sarasen8147 7 років тому +1

    F Matthews is a well known actor, and Fortune is great. Thanx.

  • @LANCSKID
    @LANCSKID Рік тому +7

    I was on the jury, front row, centre, wearing my best grey suit. One of my numerous girl friends was the ginger haired Dolly in the yellow blouse, sitting in front of the barristers. She was ‘Succulent’.

    • @Harumph-Sez-Moi
      @Harumph-Sez-Moi Рік тому

      How was the deliberation? Did you all agree or have disagreements and discussions?

    • @LANCSKID
      @LANCSKID Рік тому +1

      @@Harumph-Sez-Moi We argued over the sandwiches and libations …

    • @Harumph-Sez-Moi
      @Harumph-Sez-Moi Рік тому

      ☺get to be on tv, enjoy some food & drinks👍good times☺ @@LANCSKID

    • @elizabethgalligan1805
      @elizabethgalligan1805 6 місяців тому

      Good for you!!

    • @sophiechappell2275
      @sophiechappell2275 5 місяців тому

      So good to know these details.😂

  • @lowkeyliesmith3795
    @lowkeyliesmith3795 Рік тому +4

    So glad that 40 years later we have managed to get rid of racism in the UK police 🚨

  • @davidnelson7149
    @davidnelson7149 2 роки тому +3

    Captain Scarlett prosecuting, the blokes got no chance! lol

  • @DDandrums
    @DDandrums 8 років тому +1

    Thanks Jez.

  • @mrmofthegower3926
    @mrmofthegower3926 8 років тому

    Thanks Jez 👍🏼

  • @reubengerling6253
    @reubengerling6253 День тому

    Police calls are all recorded, strangely no mention is made of the record. Nor did the witnesses or barristers mention the police who came to assist following the call.

  • @BRUTUALTRUTH
    @BRUTUALTRUTH 6 років тому +2

    This episode is more likely to cause racial tension than have a justice smoothing effect. As for the verdict don't read other comments as it will give the game away. Great upload Jez T

  • @adk6201
    @adk6201 Рік тому +1

    This is a weird episode. I counted three unexplained bursts of laughter in the court. The judge also told of the witness for using the same turn of phrase that the counsel used.

  • @stevenmcghee6649
    @stevenmcghee6649 Рік тому +1

    Well, I dunno.....my gut feeling is the jury were right but was it beyond reasonable doubt? Then again, 8 years on the force and the guy's still a constable. Be interested to see his personnel record. It might have said "good workhorse but quite unsuitable for promotion. Best not put him in a pressure situation"

  • @LittleRedSlipper
    @LittleRedSlipper Рік тому +3

    patel should be sent to prison also for not aiding instantly!

    • @vanpallandt5799
      @vanpallandt5799 Рік тому +1

      under no obligation to help - in contrast to a police constable

  • @pdrg
    @pdrg 7 років тому +1

    Alun Adams - voice gave it away

  • @feenix8461
    @feenix8461 2 роки тому +1

    I'd like to know more about the cricket bat.

    • @LANCSKID
      @LANCSKID Рік тому +2

      It was made of willow, with a sisal wrapped handle. Autographed by Sir Gary Sobers … anything else? 👨🏾‍🦲

  • @stevesandford1437
    @stevesandford1437 6 років тому +5

    TRAVESTY!!!!!
    (I watched these shows with my mother when I was a boy... Such Fond Memories...)
    But in this case, (and I''m a Leftie Liberal!!!) I would have voted FOR THE COP!!! (British and Irish cops don't carry serious weapons and, I'm old enough to remember that in the 1970s/80s, skinheads were SCARY!!! There is NO FUCKING WAY I'd have gone up against three skinheads on my own!!!
    "CROWN COURT' as a TV series continues to delight in retrospect, but it WAS so of it's time... (Almost to the point of amusement now...) TV Drama leaned SO to the left in those days... (Now we live in a world where Mo-Ped thieves can't be chased by police if they discard their crash-helmets...)
    Is THAT a better world? (I hardly think so...)
    xx SF

  • @babi7808
    @babi7808 2 роки тому

    Please upload Crown Court Brainwashed: Part 1 episode. S12E01 Thank you!

  • @brianlopez8855
    @brianlopez8855 3 місяці тому +1

    Sounds familiar...

  • @claesmansson9070
    @claesmansson9070 2 роки тому

    According to the shoeshopowner,the constable was trying a pair of black shoes.

  • @sholemgimpel6050
    @sholemgimpel6050 6 місяців тому

    I don't believe that Const. Bowles could have recognized the victim as "an Asian" in even dim light at 1:00 Am during the 5 seconds the Const. stood in Stafford Rd. before retreating. I don't believe any witness was asked about the distance between Bowles and the victim when he first saw him. This script strikes me as one of the weaker ones, clever as it may be. I think the inference of cowardice is stronger than of racism. Bowles's locker-room statement to Stephen Gibson was made in order to cover up his shame for his initial impulse to run away. He'd rather his colleagues consider him a bigot than a coward! The conflicting testimony over the noise in the street serves no purpose that I can see, except to show that Bowles is lying. Surely there would have been a big ruckus, and Bowles could not have missed it. The sentence seems more shocking than the guilty verdict! Six months in the slammer for a momentary lapse by a constable who had rec'd a prior commendation for bravery??

  • @Kirkee7
    @Kirkee7 10 місяців тому

    The defence is clutching at straws. Guilty.

  • @EsseJD
    @EsseJD 8 років тому +5

    Good on the jury for delivering the right verdict:)
    Thanks again Jez T

  • @philipwelsh1862
    @philipwelsh1862 18 днів тому +1

    Well I had a doubt so NOT GUILTY

  • @davidfrost779
    @davidfrost779 6 місяців тому

    Noticed that the brilliant Francis Matthews does a slight northern accent

    • @elizabethgalligan1805
      @elizabethgalligan1805 6 місяців тому

      He was born in York!!!

    • @davidfrost779
      @davidfrost779 6 місяців тому

      @@elizabethgalligan1805 OK thanks its just that I'm used too not speaking with a slight northern accent

  • @kirkbrookes4812
    @kirkbrookes4812 7 років тому +1

    Another one.we may get a guilty jez. Can't bielive what way I've chosen to watch these.not had a guilty for ages.

    • @johnferguson40
      @johnferguson40 2 роки тому

      "Yes, yes, yes I do. If they misbehave YES." Good for this citizen. If all citizens acted like this chap then me wouldn't have the police that we have now.

  • @artemiszeus9735
    @artemiszeus9735 6 років тому +2

    Often debate with myself if Gerry would have been tall enough to be a U.K. policeman in the early 1980s. “Wee but gem” as we would say in Glasgow. (Gem has a hard G).

  • @shreyamenon9563
    @shreyamenon9563 Рік тому

    9:33 lol

  • @andrewjames3908
    @andrewjames3908 8 років тому +7

    these days the police are equally bent the other way

  • @TheTriformationT
    @TheTriformationT 5 років тому

    Would never happen that verdict these days

  • @mickigoe
    @mickigoe 7 років тому +11

    Appalling verdict. Monstrous injustice.

  • @kmg365100
    @kmg365100 5 років тому +3

    Why didn't either lawyer ask any witness how they knew this guy to be a cop? Was he in uniform? Also, how did these so-called witnesses know the assailants to be skinheads? Was the constable on or off duty? I also think these so-called witnesses were told what to say by Pattel. JMO.

    • @robsawalker
      @robsawalker 5 років тому +4

      Eh? He was on duty and dressed as a bobby of course. And in the 1980s men didn't shave their heads unless they were skinheads - they were easy to spot. As a mod, I was chased around by them often enough that I could spot one from 100 yards! Why would Patel have a vendetta on a policeman who had done nothing wrong? Makes no sense. Enjoy your time in chokey, cop!

  • @robinneher3262
    @robinneher3262 6 років тому +10

    What did this guy expect the constable to do? One cop against three skinheads? I read that police aren't armed in the UK.
    I wonder how these people would've felt if the constable had become a victim trying to take on three men without help?
    Also how did these people know he was a constable? Was he in uniform?

    • @rachelevans6352
      @rachelevans6352 6 років тому +2

      this is old, I think protocol has changed since and he wouldn't be expected to do anything if he was on his own.

    • @dlamiss
      @dlamiss 6 років тому +1

      I once got as far as a final interview to join the police (long long time ago) and was asked a similar scenario to this how would I react. Never forgotten it. My answer was along the lines of I would be reluctant to tackle things alone...

    • @kathleencampbell1138
      @kathleencampbell1138 6 років тому +2

      He could have rang his colleagues!

    • @arthurvasey
      @arthurvasey 3 роки тому +2

      Police aren’t armed in the U.K. - there’s a special armed division to deal with armed robberies and suchlike - even ordinary fuzz have protection against being stabbed by someone who has a knife - they usually carry a truncheon - but regular pigs don’t carry guns - you don’t see the average beat bobby walking around the local park brandishing a Luger!

    • @smithofsmiths1872
      @smithofsmiths1872 3 роки тому +5

      @@arthurvasey In fact you don't see the average beat bobby at all.

  • @AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc
    @AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc Рік тому +2

    Britanistan even then

  • @lowkeyliesmith3795
    @lowkeyliesmith3795 Рік тому

    Mr Patel is not shown been sworn in. Didn't want to show a religion other than CofE or swearing on Koran!

  • @kathleencampbell1138
    @kathleencampbell1138 6 років тому

    Good verdict

  • @wildandbarefoot
    @wildandbarefoot 7 років тому +1

    If he had run out of hiding and shot the black guy whirling his cricket bat in an aggressive manner, he wouldn't even get suspended.

  • @kirkbrookes4812
    @kirkbrookes4812 7 років тому +2

    At last a guilty.

    • @wc6936
      @wc6936 6 років тому +4

      Thanks for that. I don’t need to watch it now. Ugghh.

    • @kathleencampbell1138
      @kathleencampbell1138 6 років тому +1

      John cooper don't read the comments!

    • @beaufighter245
      @beaufighter245 6 років тому +1

      Yes, but an unfortunate verdict on this occasion.