Partial Fraction Decomposition - Example 6

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лис 2010
  • Thanks to all of you who support me on Patreon. You da real mvps! $1 per month helps!! :) / patrickjmt !! Partial Fraction Decomposition - Example 6. Partial Fraction Decomposition - Example 1. In this video, I do a partial fraction decomposition where the denominator factors as a product of LINEAR and QUADRATIC factors.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 99

  • @kerimkarabacak299
    @kerimkarabacak299 4 роки тому +6

    thank you, thank you so much this playlist has brought me out of the hell that is studying for my second Diff EQ exam. i dont know if you will read this but you have saved me. thank you a million

  • @Nursin-rg1ey
    @Nursin-rg1ey 4 роки тому +12

    “Irreducible quadratic “
    Makes you sound smart instead of saying “can’t be factored ”
    😄❤️😂

  • @thatdancinggirl9882
    @thatdancinggirl9882 7 років тому +9

    You made me understand this. I am in ninth grade. I have a terrible advanced maths teacher. You posted this 7 years ago and IT IS STILL SAVING MY LIFE!!!

  • @Ribab1
    @Ribab1 13 років тому +1

    I slept through this in class, but you are a much more less boring teacher

  • @siddharth2025
    @siddharth2025 6 років тому +1

    Integration was becoming a nightmare for me. You just saved my life. Thank you so much you are the BEST.

  • @slarrior
    @slarrior 7 років тому +13

    Thank you so much for this video. I just spent literally all day browsing through UA-cam to find a video that could perfectly explain it, and then I came across this gem. I even went to online tutoring but the tutor made a mistake and left before they were finished helping me. Thank you x1000

  • @nonracistpanda9631
    @nonracistpanda9631 6 років тому

    Bless you Patrick. 8 years in the past and you're still saving my bacon.

  • @matthewmclendon9908
    @matthewmclendon9908 6 років тому

    I hope UA-cam pays you for this because these are very accurate step by step explanations of material that some college professors seem to have trouble teaching

  • @nonichan8829
    @nonichan8829 7 років тому +4

    fabulous, thank you again passed from calc 1 to 2

  • @OmarObaid1994
    @OmarObaid1994 11 років тому +1

    It's an honor to learn from you ... Thanks a lot

  • @jeffreyholt1102
    @jeffreyholt1102 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much for giving a thorough explanation (or at least a very simple way of understanding) of the "equating coefficients method". I was having such a hard time when I wasn't able to just input x values to manipulate/isolate the letters I wanted. My book and Professor just rushed through it without explaining anything.

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому

    @adijux yes, there is a lot of stuff currently missing from the website. i am paying someone to update it, but it will take a while (limited resources here!)

  • @DanielVazquez
    @DanielVazquez 6 років тому

    Thanks! You're helping me in Differential Equations in Inverse laplace transforms. We have to do partial fraction decomposition a lot!

  • @visalatchivijayakumaran5894
    @visalatchivijayakumaran5894 8 років тому

    THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR UPLOADING THIS VIDEO.THIS HELPED ME SO MUCH FOR MY EXAMINATION.THANK YOU AGAIN.VERY EASY TO UNDERSTAND EACH AND EVERY STEP WITH THE EXPLANATION

  • @omarmuhammad786
    @omarmuhammad786 4 роки тому

    Your explanation is clear and straight to the point :D ,thank you so much

  • @EnvisageKenya
    @EnvisageKenya 7 років тому

    At 3:51 if X = 0 then 4=6A which is A=2/3.
    Still at 3:51, coefficients of X^2 are 3=A+B.. then substitute values of A which is 3=2/3+B.. subtract 3-2/3 gives you 7/3 for B.. then do for C.
    I still learnt from PatrickJMT, thank you!

  • @danielavrit4526
    @danielavrit4526 11 років тому

    This REALLY helped me. Great video!

  • @mishnareemincey
    @mishnareemincey 11 років тому

    Never mind, it looks like the coefficient would just be zero....just commenting on your videos is making me smarter!!

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому +2

    @bizkitfan49 i am glad you like this. but i am so sick of this ' no homo ' comment. it is super tacky.

  • @Arca02011
    @Arca02011 11 років тому

    cant explain how helpful you are

  • @venushagovender1681
    @venushagovender1681 10 років тому

    Great Videos On Partial Fractions :) . I feel confident about this section now

  • @yakimora
    @yakimora 13 років тому

    Very nice lecture..
    thank you very much..
    I was confused when I did take this class with my teacher..
    but now it's clear..
    again..thank you

  • @Tempestelterna
    @Tempestelterna 12 років тому +1

    thanks so much :D this helps so much for my revision :D

  • @kurianr
    @kurianr 12 років тому

    Great Videos! I've learned so much just by watching your videos. How would you integrate the solution after you turn it into partial fractions?

  • @KennedyWenneddy
    @KennedyWenneddy 8 років тому +2

    how do you match coefficients when the numerator is just 1? or any number without a variable?

  • @mthmster28
    @mthmster28 8 років тому

    i learned a lot. thanks for the video. :D

  • @17603302
    @17603302 11 років тому

    Thanks for your videos man. you are great!

  • @ROFLKitty34
    @ROFLKitty34 12 років тому +1

    Patrick, will your videos be my Valentine? :D

  • @DamnYouDamnMe
    @DamnYouDamnMe 11 років тому

    Do you know what else makes you look smart? Math! Thanks for all your vids :)

  • @rohinihrudhay5600
    @rohinihrudhay5600 2 роки тому

    hi Patrick sir , thank you for the video.

  • @bharatbhushansharma4392
    @bharatbhushansharma4392 7 років тому

    thanks for such video it really helpful for me In my board exams...

  • @Irfan_2077
    @Irfan_2077 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much Sir.

  • @Sabsabi99
    @Sabsabi99 7 років тому +2

    I better get full mark with this

  • @DrDidds
    @DrDidds 12 років тому

    I completely get how to do this, apart from when it asks in the form 2+ at the beginning or any other number, wold be so grateful if you could help me.

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  11 років тому

    when the degree of the numerator is greater than or equal to the degree of the denominator

  • @amnasarwar2745
    @amnasarwar2745 7 років тому

    Thanks, finally I know how to compare coefficients in partial fraction.... Grade 9...

  • @mishnareemincey
    @mishnareemincey 11 років тому

    This is gold man. Is there a video where you attack repeating quadratics? In one of my problems, I have an X^3 that doesn't have a coefficient to match up with...

  • @sanazahid1250
    @sanazahid1250 4 роки тому

    thanks Patrick

  • @charl7668
    @charl7668 2 роки тому

    Thabk you this help me understand this subjecf

  • @maxurbas2358
    @maxurbas2358 8 років тому

    Thanks for the help

  • @XxASDFmovie
    @XxASDFmovie 9 років тому +3

    What happens if the denominator is like (x^2+2)? What would you do for the numerator on the side of the variables? If this question makes any sense at all.

    • @FrankClautier
      @FrankClautier 9 років тому +5

      XxASDFmovie Hi, the same steps as in the video apply. The denominator in your example has no real roots (in the video it's called an "irreducible quadratic") and hence the numerator should contain a generic linear polynomial Ax+B.

  • @ivagrgic3464
    @ivagrgic3464 5 років тому +1

    And how would you integrate that last part that you got with seven thirds?!?

  • @Rick_Sanchez_Jr.
    @Rick_Sanchez_Jr. 5 років тому

    At 5:00, oh... my... god... Thank you so much! I love you! :3

  • @dumaniathenkosi7188
    @dumaniathenkosi7188 6 років тому

    YOU WERE BORN TO SAVE MY ass

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому +1

    @selinsitize come back any time :)

  • @mohammadzeeshan992
    @mohammadzeeshan992 7 років тому

    good work...

  • @jadhisham4277
    @jadhisham4277 10 років тому

    amazing just amazing thanks a lot
    1 question is there a way i can support you patrick i would really like to do that
    thanks again
    amazinnngggggggggggggggggggggggggg

  • @FINSuojeluskunta
    @FINSuojeluskunta 3 роки тому

    You should see some of the problems my homework is giving me on Pearson. Swear to god these things take like 15 minutes a piece. Holy hell.

    • @patrickjmt
      @patrickjmt  3 роки тому

      Pearson? You poor thing. They suck so much

  • @somewisealien
    @somewisealien 9 років тому +1

    what happens when you have a denominator like say.... 1-x^5 ?

  • @mohammedsharooque1105
    @mohammedsharooque1105 6 років тому

    thanks bro

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  13 років тому

    @teluguc i do

  • @adijux
    @adijux 12 років тому

    Hey, thanks for the videos. Very awesome job you have done here.
    Just one thing. I noticed that this video doesn't show up on your website (where you have a page "Partial Fraction Decomposition - Example 6"). Maybe your forgot to add the embedded youtube player there? Or it could be just me... Either way, at least I was able to find it here. :)

  • @zaaramaharaj8007
    @zaaramaharaj8007 6 років тому

    life saver

  • @Lucerozeus
    @Lucerozeus 9 років тому

    patrick you're videos are really really helpful. whenever in doubt, ask patrick and you'll now how.
    one last thing though. almost at the end of the video you said that the x that get's multiplied with the (7/3) is in the denominator. isn't that x in the numerator? or in other words isn't it (7x/3)?

    • @Lucerozeus
      @Lucerozeus 9 років тому

      oh oh... nvm... you said "...make it clear that this x isn't in the denominator..."
      thanks patrick

  • @miraix6493
    @miraix6493 8 років тому

    you're the best

  • @joeshoesmith
    @joeshoesmith 5 років тому

    I still don't get how you find which denominators to pick. Sometimes a constant gets added for fun, sometimes totally possible denominators (like the entire one on the left without factoring for instance) get ignored.

  • @bizkitfan49
    @bizkitfan49 12 років тому

    I. LOVE. YOU. ...no homo though. i've watched so many of your videos, first time commenting- thought it was needed because this particular section was very confusing to me. thanks for the help!

  • @itachi-senpaii
    @itachi-senpaii 5 років тому

    thanks a lot

  • @incloudnine
    @incloudnine 12 років тому

    when do you do the long division?

  • @keithlags
    @keithlags 13 років тому

    why do we need Bx + C? some examples i saw, they just use constants A, B or C. when do we use Bx + C term? please help. i'm getting more confused. THANKS

  • @The13thCritic
    @The13thCritic 11 років тому

    at 2:30 when you say "you could have some constant over here"
    do you always add that "C" or because you "could have a constant" is it not necessary?

    • @rutajitbharadwaj4174
      @rutajitbharadwaj4174 4 роки тому

      The13thCritic You're supposed to add it every time for this kind of decomposition

  • @TheCharizardRules
    @TheCharizardRules 10 років тому

    what happens if you have a cubic polynomial for the denominator that cant be factored, does that mean the numerator will be a quadratic. Ex. Ax^2+Bx+C

    • @redightisop4132
      @redightisop4132 10 років тому

      Find a cubic polynomial that can't be factored and i'll give u 1 million dollars
      You know that complex roots come by pairs. and the cubic polynomial has 3 solutions (in C) so there is 1 or 3 solutions in IR and 2 or 0 solutions In C.

    • @Alan-kn4lo
      @Alan-kn4lo 10 років тому

      Keep trying numbers lol

  • @tylerthompson4508
    @tylerthompson4508 10 років тому

    Doesn't each factor need to be of a degree less than the numerator?

  • @pockydust3404
    @pockydust3404 7 років тому

    Would this typically be in a pre cal or calculus class?

  • @AshDeval
    @AshDeval 11 років тому

    Patrick I need legit help. How would you do this problem? (x^3+2)/((x-1)(x^2+x+2))
    I have done till the step that I'm left with X^3=? because -C=2, and the X^2 and the X term will equal 0.

  • @EconAtheist
    @EconAtheist 9 років тому +1

    FSM do I wish you were right-handed though, dude.

  • @tamannaalam2938
    @tamannaalam2938 9 років тому

    how do I integrate the partial fraction after breaking it down?

    • @timolee8234
      @timolee8234 9 років тому +1

      Find arrangements in which you can use u-sub to get it into forms that look like 1/u.

  • @hassanulger7167
    @hassanulger7167 7 років тому +2

    can someone explain please why he used bx+c at 2:25??

    • @sanelemaziya2498
      @sanelemaziya2498 7 років тому +6

      you have to use a general equation that is one order less than the denominator. so if the denominator is a quadratic you have to use the general form of a liner equation like bx+c. similarly if the denominator was a cubic you would use the quadratic form dx^2+ex+f.

    • @siddharth2025
      @siddharth2025 6 років тому

      Basically the numerator is in the form of the derivative of the denominator. Therefore for quadratic equation, numerator will be Ax + B; for a variable X, numerator will just be a constant A; for a cubic equation the numerator will be a quadratic equation, etc

  • @ggcmagic
    @ggcmagic 13 років тому

    I LOVE YOU

  • @jamesmaketwane9144
    @jamesmaketwane9144 4 роки тому

    perfect

  • @stinggrand
    @stinggrand 12 років тому

    missing 2x+2 derivative of xsqrd+2x+6

  • @stooncol619
    @stooncol619 11 років тому

    i would be very glad to help or donate >> just tell me how :)

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому

    @ROFLKitty34 only if you get them something nice!

  • @javeriaidrees6791
    @javeriaidrees6791 7 років тому

    hmm ok that was easy thanks

  • @MrMadskillz911
    @MrMadskillz911 12 років тому

    nice nice

  • @baga836
    @baga836 9 років тому

    MATHGASM

  • @notbnull
    @notbnull 11 років тому

    I cant find any examples when this happens

  • @kretz231
    @kretz231 12 років тому

    me gusta :)

  • @sabelomashinini6504
    @sabelomashinini6504 11 років тому

    I dont think it matters.u can call it anything you want

  • @javeriaidrees6791
    @javeriaidrees6791 7 років тому

    can i just die

  • @javeriaidrees6791
    @javeriaidrees6791 7 років тому

    death is coming in less than a month.. i mean cies

  • @ADrunkSmartass
    @ADrunkSmartass 11 років тому

    u dont need to in partial fractions

  • @BC-2
    @BC-2 8 років тому

    you teach too fast, sir

    • @BC-2
      @BC-2 7 років тому

      and luckily I passed precalc and don't need this nonsense

    • @BC-2
      @BC-2 7 років тому

      yep, precalc...still makes no sense to me

    • @BC-2
      @BC-2 7 років тому

      I used a ti89 on the test...otherwise I'd have been screwed