Three years of listening in assorted classes ranging from General Chem to Organic Chem to Physical Chem and FINALLY someone introduces the Variant terms. WHAT is wrong with College professors? They ALL suck with few exceptions, and eventually they will be replaced with You Tube Learning. WHY? Because in 5 minutes I finally KNOW I understand the topic. I hope you are capitalizing financially. Thank you again!
Thank you for such a helpful video. But I have a question. For the second diagram, F=2 means we can change T and P independently. If I change P holding T constant, the number of phases will decrease from 2 to 1. Could you explain please why it is so?
Is there any special meaning behind this equation being so similar to the equation V-E+F = 2 from 3D geometry relating the vertices, edges, and faces of polyhedra?
I have a question regarding the second diagram: So we calculated for the purple point F=2. But if I only change the temperature I would leave the line. Thus, I wonot have 2 phases in equilibria anymore. Unfortunantely I couldn´t find by myself where my mistake is
![Phase Diagrams | The Clausius-Clapeyron Equation [Complete Derivation]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AcqZ2sZf6Pg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Phase Diagrams | The Clausius-Clapeyron Equation [Complete Derivation]](/img/tr.png)
Three years of listening in assorted classes ranging from General Chem to Organic Chem to Physical Chem and FINALLY someone introduces the Variant terms. WHAT is wrong with College professors? They ALL suck with few exceptions, and eventually they will be replaced with You Tube Learning. WHY? Because in 5 minutes I finally KNOW I understand the topic.
I hope you are capitalizing financially. Thank you again!
I agree
In just 15 minutes you saved me for life...youvare really a great teacher.
God bless you.
Thank you! you made me understand few pages of my materials science course in just 15 minutes!
This is without doubt, the best explanation I've gotten on Gibbs phase rule. Thank you so much♥️
Best explanation ever❤️
Thank you so much!!! The explanation is very clear :)
you are good at this!
Thank you very much.. you've helped me amazingly.
How is it in example 5 that F=2, but the point is on the equilibrium line?
Wish u were my professor, u're amazing 💓 thank you
You're really amazing at explaining! thank you!
In 12:44 he meant to say phases, not components. The video is amazing thanks :)
You explained better than my professor, subscribed!
Thanks!
Thank you for such a helpful video.
But I have a question. For the second diagram, F=2 means we can change T and P independently. If I change P holding T constant, the number of phases will decrease from 2 to 1. Could you explain please why it is so?
Is there any special meaning behind this equation being so similar to the equation V-E+F = 2 from 3D geometry relating the vertices, edges, and faces of polyhedra?
I have a question regarding the second diagram: So we calculated for the purple point F=2. But if I only change the temperature I would leave the line. Thus, I wonot have 2 phases in equilibria anymore. Unfortunantely I couldn´t find by myself where my mistake is
i'm wondering the same thing
he miscaled it in component, it should be 1.