In this video you can see how the RBMK-1000 "eats". One of the main adventages of the RBMK Reactor is that it must not be turned off during refueling time.
RBMK reactors are brilliant, there is no doubt. With careful engineers running them under nominal conditions they are totally fine and turn out clean power for many years. But. If you put them in the hands of idiots they are, in fact, not idiot-proof. Reactor containment vessels exist because people make mistakes. People not only make mistakes but they make very stupid mistakes, routinely. People make so many stupid mistakes that we can't even account for them all and that's why most of the world wraps up nuclear reactors in air tight containment vessels.
@@OwlsStudiooh really? Its ukrainians fault? Not the fact that it was built cheaply because soviet union, and its flaws were kept secret because soviet union, and its operators were not trained on the flaws because soviet union, because russia and the soviet union values lying to its own people higher than the prevention of the worlds worst nuclear accident.
@@joergmaass Some people never left the zone, animals are thriving and ejected Cs-137 is going to completely decay over the next 30 years. I really do not get the hysteria around chernobyl. It was a unique accident while fossil energy generation is causing untold damage every day through normal operation. Nuclear by all accounts is the safest and cleanest (reliable) energy source.
@@Klovaneer cs137 aint the only nucler particle arround there. uraniumhotspots will continue to decay for at least 25k years. also there are areas in the exclusionzone where nothing lifes... ask yourself why...
@@peaveyst7 Because soviets couldn't scrub everything and left all the vehicles there. You are saying humans can't live there for 25k years, i am saying there are far worse "conventional" places right now like Norilsk and yet they do.
The way the music just halts at 1:37 is so jarring, like your being slammed back into the reality of exactly what type of machine this is and what can happen to it. Very sobering lol Deeply fascinating upload! Thank you for all your work on this channel!
I thought the same thing at that cut. It felt gratifying. The goofy music annoyed me, then the abrupt silence was like slapping the silly music down. Yes. This is serious.
When you've been watching Chernobyl, Chernobyl reaction videos, and videos about the reactor and suddenly you stumble upon this thing with the goofiest Mr Bean music.
Rods did not jump, HBO is telling you all wrong. That large plum of smoke after the explosion, it is false. The aftermath is highly visible and there was slightly smoke. If the rods did jump, it needs pressure. But the heat from the reactor does not make pressure, it only turns the water into steam erupting from the lid of the reactor. So the mini series is probably 40% accurrate and defies physics and science. Correct me if i'm wrong I might start a war
Not even modern western containment buildings could contain the staggering amount of energy released by the reactor detonating. Roughly 1 tera joule of energy. Modern plants are built to withstand planes crashing into them, roughly 3.6 giga joules of energy. The containment building would need to be roughly 28x stronger than modern buildings to contain the initial explosion. That is not including any of the aftermath where the heat and radiation decomposes concrete which would cause parts of the building to collapse and leak radiation. Like, the lid was 1000 tonne and it went flying. A fully loaded airbus jet is about 350 tonne. You aren't containing that.
@@georgepirpiris7309 The containment buildings built AFTER the explosion would not have contained the explosion itself had they been built BEFORE the explosion. They are built to contain the radiation, not the explosion itself. This is a totally different function with totally different design requirements. They cannot contain an explosion of such magnitude.
"The fuel is in the form of small fuel pellets of sintered uranium dioxide with an axially-central hole. They are housed in Zircaloy rods 13.6 mm in diameter and 3.65 m long. A fuel assembly consists of two components, each with 18 rods, which are arranged in a cylindrical shape. Two of the FA components are located one above the other in the pressure tube, which is more than seven meters long. They can be replaced while the reactor is in operation, since each individual pressure tube can be isolated from the water circuit by valves.[8] A fuel element contains 114.7 kg of uranium; the entire reactor contains up to 192 tons when all channels are occupied."
The 1000MW is the standard and most common RBMK variant in service, but the fact is there also were other - existing or proposed - variants: the EGP6 (a "dwarf" RBMK designed for the Bilibino plant), and the RBMK-1500 (for Ignalina, virtually the same base as the -1000 but run with slightly less water to raise its power) saw active service. The RBMKP-2400, a version with a rectangular core instead of a circular one, to house more fuel, was also planned, but cancelled after the Chernobyl disaster (as was the construction of all but two of the RBMKs being built at the time).
Each one of those square caps is approx. 770lbs a PIECE! And the Chernobyl explosion blew the whole lot of them off, right before the core itself exploded, ripping apart the entire building structure. The sheer force needed to do that is almost beyond comprehension.
"Technical perfection is not the only advantage of the robot machine, automation ensures complete safety of people" They should have automated the control room of the reactor aswell, to prevent catastrophic human interference.
they did, but every single auto scram and automatic control was turned off for the turbine test, since the computer was just screaming at them to shut down the reactor.
There's fifty feet of empty space for the control rods to pull up into under the floor, then the reactor lid. The rods are below that. They open the "biological shield" by removing the block, then do the rest remotely.
@@ryelor123 it was a miniature model because they cannot show the inside of an active reactor, or shut down a reactor for weeks just for one tv program. the caps and the actual rods are two different things.
The techology is good as it’s operators. Stupid operator=stupid machine behavior. With proper counter-measures and proper respect to atom reaction is Nuclear and ev. Fission energy one of the most efficient and safest techology on Earth. It’s a future for us. Other opinions is irrelevant.
And Fusion even more so, if we can figure it out before we run out of fuels. People look at me funny when I tell them that our future is only sustainable with nuclear energy. Mostly because they think of Fukushima and Chernobyl. But when shown the proper safety features and maintenance of a nuclear reactor. They usually change their minds.
@@FortyBuckle Russia already has a technology of using a closed fuel cycle, this technology is already being applied in practice. Therefore, they can use spent nuclear fuel, including from other countries, and the reserves are already huge.
Nuclear reactors need to me made so maintenence is easier but even then you have to spare no expense they have to be operated amd confined to the laws because we don't want a badly maintained reactor blow up now do we lol
0:39 почему он сидит за пультом управления в каске, тем более без ремешка? Реактор на мощности, тем более. На БЩУ, например, для касок отдельный стеллаж есть, до того как ты заходишь еще вовнутрь. Чтобы случайно не уронить каску на кнопки управления.
@@MaybeShimoand, the issue that cause the actual explosion (the control rods melting and getting stuck half in) had happened once at another RBMK facility. But was covered up by the Soviet government. Such a shame, it ruined all public trust in nuclear energy.
Film cameras, and technology in general doesn’t like radiation. So I imagine taking a spent fuel rod out of the reactor would cause a larger amount of radiation being released. Which could be dangerous for the film crew and make the footage very poor quality.
It just occurred to me at the end of the video with the camera on the wall, if footage actually exists of chnnpp4 blowing its cover so to speak. Russia have classified stuff much like the USA so it would not come as a surprise to hear of it being Classified TS
It's massive itself, so it can take a bit of heat(even nuclear decay heat). Rod will be inside for not long time and soon will be unloaded to the classical cooling pool.
The decay heat is compensated for by the refueling machine itself, which is filled with water to keep the rods cool while they're being moved around between the core and the spent fuel pools behind the reactor.
The control rods and other in-core sensing equipment are located beneath the darker channel plugs. They're operated by servos, so they don't need manual operation
Most of them come from the top,the machinery is under those colored caps not gray ones but diferent colored caps, most of them come from the top, there are also some short rods that come from the bottom
France have built "kind of" the same natural U238 reactors + graphite moderator around the 60s before we could get proper enriched uranium and pressurized reactors under a Westinghouse licence. There are around 10 of these reactors and 2 major accidents occured (INES 4) in the 80s. They were completely stopped just years after Chernobyl (1990/1992) - too dangerous and too expensive to maintain in comparison with the Westinghouse design. These reactors are still at the dismantling stage and these loading machines are still there. From the reactor hall, you have windows and you can look at the scenery 😂 there is no containment building at all, no concrete enveloppe, the windows are in plexiglass, less thick than a windshield of a car... We could have done worse than Chernobyl in 1980, hopefully the core did not explode, the reactor was stopped way before when an overheat was detected. Saved by the strict application of safety procedures on a flawed technology. Hopefully we stopped that crazyness to build much more safer Pressurized reactors. Saint Laurent des Eaux, UNGG reactor.
Are those guys actually standing right on top of an operating reactor and lifting the rods manually?? Why are they doing that if they have a machine to do it?
"Now I know how an RBMK reactor works. Now I don't need you."
man of culture
I always imagined those blocks to be several stories high for some reason.
Me too, your not alone
Same
@@luma8212 yeah same here
They are, the 2ft blocks are just protective covers to separate the core from the charge face. The entire assembly is around 8 metres high.
They were for like 5 seconds technically, but gravity.
It's mind boggling how massive the RBMK really is
that loading/unloading device is probably a large chunk of the cost of the facility, what a beast
Normally when I think of a reactor core I think of something the size of a room
not the size of a house
“An RBMK Reactor is like a giant steam engine”
for sure !
One rod is 350kg and there is 200 at least
It's cool how they can be refueled without shutting them down. They were aiming for practicality, and easy of maintenance with these reactors.
RBMK reactors are brilliant, there is no doubt. With careful engineers running them under nominal conditions they are totally fine and turn out clean power for many years. But. If you put them in the hands of idiots they are, in fact, not idiot-proof. Reactor containment vessels exist because people make mistakes. People not only make mistakes but they make very stupid mistakes, routinely. People make so many stupid mistakes that we can't even account for them all and that's why most of the world wraps up nuclear reactors in air tight containment vessels.
@@jje984 one nuclear power plant was given into the hands of Ukrainians and Chernobyl happened, so you're right.
Plus you have less downtime if you can hot fuel the reactor.
There was a focus on producing Pu.
@@OwlsStudiooh really? Its ukrainians fault? Not the fact that it was built cheaply because soviet union, and its flaws were kept secret because soviet union, and its operators were not trained on the flaws because soviet union, because russia and the soviet union values lying to its own people higher than the prevention of the worlds worst nuclear accident.
Yes that is Chernobyl
*Was
@@Anonymus_M8 lmao
It took 65 years to go from the first car to the first nuclear plant.
And it will take at least 25000 years until humans can safely settle in the Chernobyl exclusion zone again, if we don't eff up in the meantime...
@@joergmaass Some people never left the zone, animals are thriving and ejected Cs-137 is going to completely decay over the next 30 years.
I really do not get the hysteria around chernobyl. It was a unique accident while fossil energy generation is causing untold damage every day through normal operation. Nuclear by all accounts is the safest and cleanest (reliable) energy source.
@@abloydiie No the car was slow
@@Klovaneer cs137 aint the only nucler particle arround there. uraniumhotspots will continue to decay for at least 25k years. also there are areas in the exclusionzone where nothing lifes... ask yourself why...
@@peaveyst7 Because soviets couldn't scrub everything and left all the vehicles there. You are saying humans can't live there for 25k years, i am saying there are far worse "conventional" places right now like Norilsk and yet they do.
The way the music just halts at 1:37 is so jarring, like your being slammed back into the reality of exactly what type of machine this is and what can happen to it. Very sobering lol
Deeply fascinating upload! Thank you for all your work on this channel!
I'd never noticed it until you mentioned it
This exact style is present within every video of Eastern-Bloc documentaries
I thought the same thing at that cut. It felt gratifying. The goofy music annoyed me, then the abrupt silence was like slapping the silly music down. Yes. This is serious.
Hey there, Jesus loves you whoever you are 😊
When you've been watching Chernobyl, Chernobyl reaction videos, and videos about the reactor and suddenly you stumble upon this thing with the goofiest Mr Bean music.
Everyone a Gangsta until those rods starts jumping up & down
blame the music
Lol🤡lmao🤡
in fact when there are jumping up & down means that someone forgot to feed them. (water) That's why had exploded.
Nice reactor there, would be interesting if someone did a test to see what would happen if something went wrong
You're confused, RBMK reactor cores dont explode
Radiation would only be around 2000 Roentgen, nothing to worry about
@@kyrios443That's not great, but not terrible.
@@kyrios443not great not terrible..
@@Anakin_Sandy_High_Ground Every lie incurs a debt to the truth!!!!
Its beautiful, when its done right
Same can be said about asbestos.
@@ryelor123same can be said about driving.
And cooking…
Imagine looking over and seeing these blocks dancing up n down due to the pressure of a meltdown 😳
Rods did not jump, HBO is telling you all wrong. That large plum of smoke after the explosion, it is false. The aftermath is highly visible and there was slightly smoke. If the rods did jump, it needs pressure. But the heat from the reactor does not make pressure, it only turns the water into steam erupting from the lid of the reactor. So the mini series is probably 40% accurrate and defies physics and science. Correct me if i'm wrong I might start a war
They can’t, furthermore it’s impossible.
@@NovaSuperSuperthat's what happend...
@@NovaSuperSuper RBMK reactors don't explode
@@deucifer4170 No, literally, the rods can’t bounce
I like when he says it fuels a giant furnace
Because that's exactly what it is. A very, very complicated way of making steam to drive a turbine😅
Such a cool reactor but it's really scary to see that It had no containment building.
Not even modern western containment buildings could contain the staggering amount of energy released by the reactor detonating. Roughly 1 tera joule of energy. Modern plants are built to withstand planes crashing into them, roughly 3.6 giga joules of energy.
The containment building would need to be roughly 28x stronger than modern buildings to contain the initial explosion. That is not including any of the aftermath where the heat and radiation decomposes concrete which would cause parts of the building to collapse and leak radiation.
Like, the lid was 1000 tonne and it went flying. A fully loaded airbus jet is about 350 tonne. You aren't containing that.
Fr. If a containment building was put. Maybe it stoped the explosion.
@Avioes_e_minecraft good news they built a containment building after the fact, TWICE 😂😂😂
@@georgepirpiris7309
The containment buildings built AFTER the explosion would not have contained the explosion itself had they been built BEFORE the explosion.
They are built to contain the radiation, not the explosion itself. This is a totally different function with totally different design requirements. They cannot contain an explosion of such magnitude.
"The fuel is in the form of small fuel pellets of sintered uranium dioxide with an axially-central hole. They are housed in Zircaloy rods 13.6 mm in diameter and 3.65 m long. A fuel assembly consists of two components, each with 18 rods, which are arranged in a cylindrical shape. Two of the FA components are located one above the other in the pressure tube, which is more than seven meters long. They can be replaced while the reactor is in operation, since each individual pressure tube can be isolated from the water circuit by valves.[8] A fuel element contains 114.7 kg of uranium; the entire reactor contains up to 192 tons when all channels are occupied."
3.6 long... not great, not terrible
The 1000MW is the standard and most common RBMK variant in service, but the fact is there also were other - existing or proposed - variants: the EGP6 (a "dwarf" RBMK designed for the Bilibino plant), and the RBMK-1500 (for Ignalina, virtually the same base as the -1000 but run with slightly less water to raise its power) saw active service.
The RBMKP-2400, a version with a rectangular core instead of a circular one, to house more fuel, was also planned, but cancelled after the Chernobyl disaster (as was the construction of all but two of the RBMKs being built at the time).
Happy reactor!
Each one of those square caps is approx. 770lbs a PIECE! And the Chernobyl explosion blew the whole lot of them off, right before the core itself exploded, ripping apart the entire building structure. The sheer force needed to do that is almost beyond comprehension.
Steam explosions can be extremely powerful.
More like 350 lbs
@@popcat1576 no its 770lbs. you're thinking of 350 kilograms
Actually this is filmed at Chernobyl power plant. Yes, that Chernobyl.
"Technical perfection is not the only advantage of the robot machine, automation ensures complete safety of people"
They should have automated the control room of the reactor aswell, to prevent catastrophic human interference.
They did, with the SKALA computer, which actually recommended shutting down the reactor before the disaster, which was ignored by the workers.
they did, but every single auto scram and automatic control was turned off for the turbine test, since the computer was just screaming at them to shut down the reactor.
Music: 😊
1986: 💀
Kinda like the Challenger disaster, Chernobyl didn't need to happen...
Aren’t they exposed to the reactor when they lift them caps off? I mean the fuel rods are directly below the caps correct?
There's fifty feet of empty space for the control rods to pull up into under the floor, then the reactor lid. The rods are below that. They open the "biological shield" by removing the block, then do the rest remotely.
@@loupgarou-dj3tm thank you
Each rod they take out of the reactor lid to refuel it weighs 350kg
Those are technological channels and the caps weigh 50kg.
I think that was actually just a miniature model since they didn't want to show secret stuff.
@@variegatus4674 are these solid blocks of metal or something? They seemed like they weigh more than 50kg.
@@ryelor123 it was a miniature model because they cannot show the inside of an active reactor, or shut down a reactor for weeks just for one tv program.
the caps and the actual rods are two different things.
but less than ur mama😂
👍The size! Holy cow!!!😯
RBMK-1000, not great, not terrible
Well, I'm glad I know now, might come in handy some time soon
Don’t forget to press AZ-5 if something goes wrong… That’s the secret (and don’t forget to have Diatlov onboard too)… 💀
don't forget to not run that nuclear power plant lower than 700 mw
It turns out that the AZ-5 button was the dentenator
It was too late
The AZ-5 procedure failed
The soundtrack was awesome!
Would love to know the synth used for the brass bass.
Yamaha DX7 #18 Fretless 1 with some filters on it.
Ya I was gonna say that sounds nice
The techology is good as it’s operators. Stupid operator=stupid machine behavior. With proper counter-measures and proper respect to atom reaction is Nuclear and ev. Fission energy one of the most efficient and safest techology on Earth. It’s a future for us. Other opinions is irrelevant.
And Fusion even more so, if we can figure it out before we run out of fuels. People look at me funny when I tell them that our future is only sustainable with nuclear energy. Mostly because they think of Fukushima and Chernobyl. But when shown the proper safety features and maintenance of a nuclear reactor. They usually change their minds.
@@FortyBuckle Russia already has a technology of using a closed fuel cycle, this technology is already being applied in practice. Therefore, they can use spent nuclear fuel, including from other countries, and the reserves are already huge.
Nuclear reactors need to me made so maintenence is easier but even then you have to spare no expense they have to be operated amd confined to the laws because we don't want a badly maintained reactor blow up now do we lol
All I can say is
SPASIBA
I am suprised how loose those blocks are
They weigh like 50-75kg
@@bathtub1171350kg
@@XvrntrYes
@@Xvrntr no buddy 50 kg tops. Actual technical information conveys this
Quite relaxing
Bro, the music is a hit
I bet you see "white dots" flashing randomly right?
They say it's some radioactive atom bullets. Idk
The feedwater is mildly contaminated, he'll be fine, I've seen worse.
He’s in shock
I don't know what the narrator was saying, but it was sort of interesting to watch.
Que top o vídeo
Honestly this plays out like a Wes Anderson film. The only thing missing is an awkward introduction to each individual person in the film.
Namaha 👍👍
i wonder if they play that music in the reactor hall when doing this operation? does it calm the workers or something?
0:39 почему он сидит за пультом управления в каске, тем более без ремешка? Реактор на мощности, тем более. На БЩУ, например, для касок отдельный стеллаж есть, до того как ты заходишь еще вовнутрь. Чтобы случайно не уронить каску на кнопки управления.
Ich denke das kann nicht passieren. Die Knöpfe müssen gezogen, nicht gedrückt werden. Wie in Stellwerken der Bahn.
this reactor was used on a powerplant called chernobyl that exploded in 1986.
mainly caused by user error - as well as systematic errors in regulations
@@ghostrider-be9ek had they followed safety procedures, it probably wouldn't have been an issue.
@@MaybeShimoand, the issue that cause the actual explosion (the control rods melting and getting stuck half in) had happened once at another RBMK facility. But was covered up by the Soviet government.
Such a shame, it ruined all public trust in nuclear energy.
entertaining even tho I dont understand
It has English subtitles, written by a human. Not the stupid YT subtitles.
Captions are available.
Captions are available.
Id rate this instructional video a 3.6.
Not great, not terrible
Its equivalent to 1 like
It's over 9000!
Where was this video taken? Kursk? Smolensk where?
Every city needs one, or two.
This Video Was Filmed In Leningrad NPP Reactor 1.
That’s a very reliable reactor
Except when idiots run it.
Germany needs some of this RBMKs, situation is urgent!
2:14 tiny white flashes from ionizing radiation?
Yes
Not only because of it. The cameras had a bit of flashes until ~1990/1995
Been there. Amazingly tall roof.
Meanwhile at number 4, "they've only gone and blown the bloody lid orf"
why is this so whimsical
Wait, if the RZM machine is controlled remotely, then why do we need a cabin that is installed directly on it?
Bizarre they made a dodgy model when we can see the actual reactor.
Now I know how an RBMK-1000 is refueled. I don't you need anymore.
1:01 I think that's a model used for educational purposes. I bet they didn't want that stuff to be publicly seen.
Yes, educational model, but mainly just so its clear how it works.
Film cameras, and technology in general doesn’t like radiation.
So I imagine taking a spent fuel rod out of the reactor would cause a larger amount of radiation being released. Which could be dangerous for the film crew and make the footage very poor quality.
The RZM Machine!!!!!!!!!!
Interesting
They have steel balls to do this job
Warning: This video is taken before the Explosion Happened.
Not a bad concept. Too bad about that Rapid Unplanned Disassembly at Chernobyl Unit 4.
0:26 Electronic Robert
It just occurred to me at the end of the video with the camera on the wall, if footage actually exists of chnnpp4 blowing its cover so to speak. Russia have classified stuff much like the USA so it would not come as a surprise to hear of it being Classified TS
I think that the camera probably got fried
All the gamma rays would have destroyed that camera in seconds 🤣
Why dont they have any problem with decay heat after removing the uranium fuel rod?
Once removed, the fuel rods are placed in a holding pool for more than one year.
It's massive itself, so it can take a bit of heat(even nuclear decay heat). Rod will be inside for not long time and soon will be unloaded to the classical cooling pool.
The decay heat is compensated for by the refueling machine itself, which is filled with water to keep the rods cool while they're being moved around between the core and the spent fuel pools behind the reactor.
"decay heat"
In can be several 100 kW per fuel rod, when just removed.
Nais
You didn't see graphite, because it's not there.
wdym?
It’s only found inside the core
@@ethanlapating6397 That's a reference from HBO Chernobyl. I'll rate that quote to be not great, not terrible.
Where are the control rods? I assume they don't come from the top since I don't see any machinery above it.
They are under those blocks that u see on the lid
The control rods and other in-core sensing equipment are located beneath the darker channel plugs. They're operated by servos, so they don't need manual operation
Most of them come from the top,the machinery is under those colored caps not gray ones but diferent colored caps, most of them come from the top, there are also some short rods that come from the bottom
So they made a robot, to show how the real robot works?
Yes🤡
Safety First, that's what I always say.
What music is used in this video?
Don’t know but I’m trying to find out as well
Yeah but whatever you do, do NOT press AZ-5
Uh oh why is the KGB at my door
Do you taste metal?
"Tell me how a RBMK explodes" well ......
The fuel rods are, so tiny😮
what's the music?
Mr. Roboto
(Going up rod) *KABOOM CHERNOBYL 2!*
France have built "kind of" the same natural U238 reactors + graphite moderator around the 60s before we could get proper enriched uranium and pressurized reactors under a Westinghouse licence. There are around 10 of these reactors and 2 major accidents occured (INES 4) in the 80s. They were completely stopped just years after Chernobyl (1990/1992) - too dangerous and too expensive to maintain in comparison with the Westinghouse design.
These reactors are still at the dismantling stage and these loading machines are still there.
From the reactor hall, you have windows and you can look at the scenery 😂 there is no containment building at all, no concrete enveloppe, the windows are in plexiglass, less thick than a windshield of a car...
We could have done worse than Chernobyl in 1980, hopefully the core did not explode, the reactor was stopped way before when an overheat was detected. Saved by the strict application of safety procedures on a flawed technology.
Hopefully we stopped that crazyness to build much more safer Pressurized reactors.
Saint Laurent des Eaux, UNGG reactor.
I think that is Chernobyl?
Yeah, in all its beauty.
Yes it is
Yes
The blocks can jump around and comrades can jump too by stepping on them, but be careful not to let them hit your balls.
Дебил ?
Жалко чоо он зарвался😢
So cool. We should build more reactors like this.
Electric cigar?
so this is the video of RBMK 1000 after it exploded in chernobyl
Nahhhhh is this reactor 4😭 AZ-5
When was this video made?
Chernobyl
@@lepinjalmaoWHEN not where
Helluva way to boil water
Are those guys actually standing right on top of an operating reactor and lifting the rods manually?? Why are they doing that if they have a machine to do it?
I think the machine doesn’t have the right size to grab so they do it manually
Like random control rod covers
0:54 what is that company?
Uralmash
boom
Maybe they shouldn't have had so many sous-chefs running the nuclear power plant.
In one night, they where all ejected. Soviet efficiency.
Fun fact this was filmed in chernobyl
what music is that
I don’t know but I’m also trying to find out
I don't see comrad dylatov..where is he?
he is home due to the delusional team
SPEED 0.25 MINUTE 0:58
= CRAK
Put me inside this place and ask me to describe what I'm seeing....and I'll have the same look on my face as I do when I'm watching Jeopardy.......
You can press AZ-5