What is Corporate Cash?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 сер 2024
- Investing in index funds is a waste of time! Start day trading! (for legal reasons this is a joke) but actually. (but for legal reasons this is a joke).
Twitch | / atrioc
Twitter | / atrioc
UA-cam | / atrioc
VOD Channel | / @atriocvods
Reddit | / atrioc
Edited by ædish :) | / aedishedits
Outro music | @CMT8
#atrioc #clips #twitch
Offloading a book report onto your chat and then making content out of it is peak passive income.
Tbf he paid the chatter
@@loune3799 this is like ghost writing but with twitch culture, banger
@@loune3799 Wait a minute. That's passive outcome.
Fake news@@loune3799
Better than reacting to UA-cam videos lol full consent all the way around. Ik this is a joke comment, js
Let's go, that's me
you him :0
@@chillaxTFthey it 🤯
Good job! Thanks for the book report!
Thank you!@@antonsoriano2385
Subbed! Your presentation style felt super natural, slides were well-picked, and I liked your voice!
If you think of doing more, I'll def check it out, regardless of topic! (:
6:16 new Brandon laugh unlocked
The fact that an Atrioc viewer actually made a genuine video essay for him and not a silly joke video is impressive. Everytime Atrioc shows them I feel like a Coffee Cow or Glizzy Hands is gonna be thrown in there somewhere
It was very difficult to deny my instincts of including Glizzys everywhere
0:40 I was reading this book too and I kid you not, I thought the exact same thing. Where does "12" come from. I thought I just missed something. Even the first few words of the intro literally mention that it's a notional number and not an exact one, and I just scratched my head wondering why it wasn't defined in the glossary beforehand!
4 of those equity firms have equity firms so 4+4*2=12? idk 7:04
Yeah I think the 12 is accounting for the junior companies as well, though technically it is just 8.
@@ashtoncartner It's just a term that has been in use for a while. The 12 isn't a literal number, it's just part of the terminology coming from the history of it. It just describes the notion of a small amount of companies or individuals who hold a disproportionately high amount of power and leverage
macromusings.libsyn.com/john-coates-on-the-problem-of-twelve-when-a-few-financial-institutions-control-everything
Clearly he's saying "Fuck Twelve"
weirdest laugh ive heard from him 6:18
Who made the book report? I'd really like to see other stuff hes made, if there is any
jamietarantulas, hasn't really made anything else
Me! Sorry, haven't really done anything else lol
@@jamietarantulasIf Dr. Battle is holding your family hostage because you're trying to take his job, reply with a Glizzy Hands or Glancer reference. Help will be sent.
@@jamietarantulas I think you should try it if that interests you. In any case I really liked this video!
@jamietarantulas you better start making shit.
ædish actually does so good editing these making them feel like the main channel vids
The efficient market theory isn't that market participants are omniscient. It is that everything that is commonly known and easily accounted for will be factored into prices. It means that there are no easy arbitrages opportunities based on common knowledge. If there's a lot of uncertainty, then the market will overreact or underreact and you can make money. If you know something that few know (like rats in McDonalds) then you can make money assuming that info is made public.
So that is an example of the Weak version of the Efficient Market Theory. The Strong version of the theory does argue that the markets do factor in everything in the price.
@@coleball6001 That's interesting. The strong version doesn't seem like it would hold up in real markets though.
It's a good thing you linked his video in the description
oh wait
Efficient market theory is absolutely correct, it is just that people just don't understand it. What people don't understand is that the theory is that the market takes all publicly known information and integrates it into the price based on probabilities. The 2 key words people always forget is publicly known and probability. Basically, insider trading can still make you money because the market hasn't priced that information in yet. The moment it becomes public, the market prices it in. Also, people don't understand what probability means. The market will price in good and bad information based on probable outcomes. Say for example Apple release the Apple Anal Beads. The market will price in all potential outcomes of this product based on their likelihood to happen. Say there is a 60% chance that revenues go up by 10%, 20% chance that revenues go up 50%, and a 20% chance that revenues drop 30%. The market is pricing in the probability of all scenarios based on their likelihood to happen.
Yes, this is not always instantaneous, so the market can be temporarily irrational. However, over the long run, all stocks will fall back in line with reality.
He really needs to watch the Nortel video
In Sweden every limited company has to turn in their annual rapport and they are public. Their share register are public as well. I think this is the norm in Europe.
This is also true in the US. Quarterly/Annual earnings reports are public and free to access and a list of who owns shares in a company is also publicly available usually at said annual earnings call.
@@SomethingWittyRW is that the case for private companies as well? It sounded like you didnt have to disclose annual earning if the company was not public.
@@sexygreger no private companies don't have to post earnings reports but you can't buy shares in non publicly traded companies so it doesn't matter
@@SomethingWittyRW It does matter for potential business partners as well as the public.
There needs to be scaling thresh holds. Where the larger a company becomes the more transparent it becomes to the public. Such as gross margin, number of employees, number of locations, etc, This would also include subordinate companies, so that there could be no trickery through clever paper work.
6:16 someone find if this is even the real atrioc ive never heard such a goofy laugh someone make sure hes safe is it a cry for help?
2/20 was and remains a popular fee model in private equity and hedge funds.
Index funds are generally charging less than 1.00% of average weighted AUM.
dunno, hopefully they can share some cash with me
It is pretty scary. Indexes are by market cap; so, 40% of things like TSLA are owned by "institutional investors", which are Vanguard and the like. So there is a lot of wealth concentrated in these large companies, simply because they're large companies. It has been working so far, but if you really think about it, it is a bit unsettling. At least with day trading you know what your money is up to.
Were the subcompanies from the private equity firms the last 4 companies that make 12
Very interesting and informative! GJ
bro reads matt levine
fellow male Jamie lets gooooo
I got a robinhood ad at the beginning of this video
there was a fire movie abt the buisness plot it was fire, its called amsterdam wit margot robbie and christian bale. Its more really abt the characters, but the entire movie is based around them trying to uncover it, 9/10 recomend
another fire clip big a
3:40 Wait i thought blackrock was a private military company wtf.
I understand glizzys concerns about inefficient markets as a result from a large share of index investors. But inefficient markets also mean more profit opportunities for active investors. So more index investors -> less efficient markets -> active investing more profitable -> more active investors.
A large share of index investors is probably not something to worry too much about
Nah man, index funds are going to be better on average than actively managed funds even if they had the same ERs. Index funds are going to bounce around the ideal exponential curve of the market, whereas actively managed funds won't necessarily bounce back after a crash.
I'm all in index funds.
FDR extended the depression. Unemployment under him was terrible until the war (and an industrial military complex is not a good thing). Compare the depression of 1920-21 and its response to FDR's terrible one
Link to the viewer video?
ua-cam.com/video/gLDEjWmZYNM/v-deo.html
Is this my legacy? Being bought by Atrioc?
most laws are just for the poor xd
love atrioc's content but when he said you don't have to pay back business loans if you go out of business is dead wrong hahahah you will still have to pay that back.
???
this is untrue (broadly) and is the entire purpose of making an corporation/LLC - the limited liability. separation of personal finances and business finances is very real. If your bakery goes out of business on a loan they can't come take your house.
If you set it up as a "general partnership" etc. then yeah they can go after your personal assets.
@@AtriocClipsI’ve realized now that the best way to get a response from atrioc is to say something business related that is obviously wrong 😂 (also thank you for teaching me stuff 🫡)
This is incorrect. A business that declares bankruptcy is obligated to either liquidate its assets to pay back as much as possible of the loans (usually in a priority order of employee salaries, then debt, then equityholders), or they work with the court to “restructure” where they negotiate with the creditors to essentially “restart” the companies with the previous creditors owning a stake in the new company (as a way to potentially get the money they loaned back)
So no, a business that goes bankrupt is not obligated to pay its loans back in full, they are just obligated to pay whatever money they company has left (in assets or in equity ownership) to the priority list of creditors
sounds like the issue is inherently political.
owo
Fr
Ngl a huge amount of mistakes and (accidental) misinformation in this video. I know it’s summarizing a book but that’s no excuse to present this stuff unchallenged.
pls elaborate
If you aren't going to provide specifics on what is wrong then nobody would ever believe you 😂
Regardless of the misinformation, it being a silly book report is absolutely an excuse for it
What's happens when people stop investing and take their money out of these funds? ... I don't understand what is happening with modern day money movement. This is so weird. ... How do you say "Socialism with extra steps" ... in my opinion, y'all are so st*pid and lazy. like...let me just pool my money together with random people and the corporations will help me make more money. Investing 101.
It's stupid and lazy, and I would add that it makes society worse because we're just giving more money and power to these vampires by investing in them. It has nothing to do with socialism though
owo