This is the BEST explanation for the proof of the FTC that I have ever seen in 30 years of looking. Very good teaching methodology and class interaction. Thank You!!!
Thnx!! You're a great!! My teacher told me to just leave FTC 2 coz I won't understand & you're great I just understood it perfectly!! I loved your shirt!!
Why does the sequence of x values start at index 0 as in {x0, x1, x2, ..., xn} but the sum begins at i=1? Seems like a cheeky way to make it work in the end, and thus your proof is flawed. It's one or the other. Start at zero or one.
The first endpoint is x_0 but the first rectangle width is \delta x_1. The widths are named after the right-most endpoint. You could choose the left-most endpoint if you prefer. It makes the proof different, not better. In fact, doing so would be an excellent exercise!
yes proof is,wrong at every rectangle strip he is usinh ftc ,look closely its like circular reasoning ,more in meam value theorem he didmt showed f'(c) is not random c its equal to height of rectangular strip
always enjoyed this video, however i do wonder that is relies entirely on f(x) being differentiable... and that's not required by FTOC. otherwise great
This is the BEST explanation for the proof of the FTC that I have ever seen in 30 years of looking. Very good teaching methodology and class interaction. Thank You!!!
+poisenkake If you can do one better - I'll watch it!
The explanation is so fluid and intuitive.thank you for posting these videos.
Simple.Beautiful. Great explanation!
Thnx!! You're a great!! My teacher told me to just leave FTC 2 coz I won't understand & you're great I just understood it perfectly!!
I loved your shirt!!
this guy is an awesome teacher! i hope he runs for president
Really good video! Finally understand it.
I love this presentation of FTC 2!!!!!!!
Would you please do FTC 1 as that is really my point of confusion!!!
THANKS
Sir your explanation is brilliant but why haven't you done a video on solids of revolution.
Why does the sequence of x values start at index 0 as in {x0, x1, x2, ..., xn} but the sum begins at i=1? Seems like a cheeky way to make it work in the end, and thus your proof is flawed. It's one or the other. Start at zero or one.
The first endpoint is x_0 but the first rectangle width is \delta x_1. The widths are named after the right-most endpoint. You could choose the left-most endpoint if you prefer. It makes the proof different, not better. In fact, doing so would be an excellent exercise!
yes proof is,wrong at every rectangle strip he is usinh ftc ,look closely its like circular reasoning ,more in meam value theorem he didmt showed f'(c) is not random c its equal to height of rectangular strip
This was fantastic!
This makes a lot of sense :D
طلاب اليدرسون خارج القطر شكد معدل الطب والقسط شكد 🤔
always enjoyed this video, however i do wonder that is relies entirely on f(x) being differentiable... and that's not required by FTOC. otherwise great
This is beautiful :')