Real Analysis 56 | Proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 жов 2024
  • 📝 Find more here: tbsom.de/s/ra
    👍 Support the channel on Steady: steadyhq.com/e...
    Other possibilities here: tbsom.de/sp
    You can also support me via PayPal: paypal.me/brig...
    Or via Ko-fi: ko-fi.com/theb...
    Or via Patreon: / bsom
    Or via other methods: thebrightsideo...
    Join this channel on UA-cam: / @brightsideofmaths
    💬 Access to the community forum: thebrightsideo...
    🕚 Early access for videos: thebrightsideo...
    ❓ FAQ: thebrightsideo...
    🛠️ What tools do you use: thebrightsideo...
    Please consider to support me if this video was helpful such that I can continue to produce them :)
    Each supporter gets access to the additional material. If you need more information, just send me an email: tbsom.de/s/mail
    Watch the whole video series about Real Analysis and download PDF versions, quizzes and exercises: tbsom.de/s/ra
    Supporting me via Steady is the best option for me and you. Please consider choosing a supporter package here: tbsom.de/s/sub...
    🌙 There is also a dark mode version of this video: • Real Analysis 56 | Pro...
    🔆 There is also a bright mode version of this video: • Real Analysis 56 | Pro...
    🔆 To find the UA-cam-Playlist, click here for the bright version: • Real Analysis
    🌙 And click here for the dark version of the playlist: • Real Analysis [dark ve...
    🙏 Thanks to all supporters! They are mentioned in the credits of the video :)
    This is my video series about Real Analysis. We talk about sequences, series, continuous functions, differentiable functions, and integral. I hope that it will help everyone who wants to learn about it.
    x
    #RealAnalysis
    #Mathematics
    #Calculus
    #LearnMath
    #Integrals
    #Derivatives
    I hope that this helps students, pupils and others. Have fun!
    (This explanation fits to lectures for students in their first and second year of study: Mathematics for physicists, Mathematics for the natural science, Mathematics for engineers and so on)
    For questions, you can contact me: steadyhq.com/e...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @gauravnainwal5026
    @gauravnainwal5026 Рік тому +12

    I want to say this to you-- your channel is a goldmine. You make concise videos on essential topics of a subject. This saves so much time for those who want to learn the essentials without having to watch hours long lectures. I am so so grateful for this service of yours. Request: Please make series on Linear Algebra (with advanced topics), and Multivariable Analysis (with manifold stuff, and classical theorems of vector calculus). That will be so awesome! Thank you again.

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  Рік тому +2

      Thank you very much!
      Linear Algebra and multivarible calculus are in production, see here: tbsom.de/s/la
      Advance topics will come :)

  • @monochr0m
    @monochr0m 2 роки тому +4

    Ich mache grade meine Promotion in Physik und bin längst mit allen Mathematik Kursen durch, aber die Videos machen trotzdem immer Spaß :D

  • @johnsu9949
    @johnsu9949 2 місяці тому

    I've got queries in the proof of the second fundamental theorem of calculus:
    1) Fo(a) = 0 implies the theorem holds for Fo because on the LHS the integral is indeed just 0 and on the RHS we have F(a) - F(a) = 0 = LHS right?
    2) In the last step Fo(b) - Fo(a) = integral from a to b f(t) dt because we already proved that the theorem works for Fo? I got quite confused here because we proved it works purely by using Fo(a) = 0 and nothing about Fo(b) :(
    3) Lastly, how can we relate area to slope through FTC I can't seem to draw any conlcusion 😢

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  2 місяці тому

      Such long questions are best discussed in my community forum.

  • @synaestheziac
    @synaestheziac 2 роки тому

    What is the justification for the step “there exists mu such that…” around @5:30? It’s intuitively clear, but at the moment I can’t think of which specific theorem allows us to make that step.

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  2 роки тому +1

      Just define mu by the quotient of both integrals. That's all :)

  • @mastershooter64
    @mastershooter64 2 роки тому +2

    another awesome video :D

  • @VictorHugo-xn9jz
    @VictorHugo-xn9jz Рік тому

    I can't understand the part where you transform [ int (x) to (x + h) of f(t) dt ] into [ f(x hat) times h ] with the mean value theorem of integration. Shouldn't it be [ f(t hat) times h ] ? It's at 8:05.

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  Рік тому +1

      It's the means value theorem. How you call the intermediate point does not matter. It's just a name.

  • @aaravjayalwal3416
    @aaravjayalwal3416 Місяць тому

    i am studying in iitb, and my teacher failed to teach a topic, that could be taught so easily

  • @rafaelschipiura9865
    @rafaelschipiura9865 Рік тому

    I think giving an example of what the fundamental theorem of calculus doesn't prove would be beneficial here. I'm thinking about the integral of the Normal density.

  • @khalidmohammadjama
    @khalidmohammadjama 2 роки тому

    Ander great video