I was in philosophy of science and today i gave the test on this test and i watch this video before test and it really helps me to better undaunted demarcation problem thanx sir 🙏
Sir honestly speaking i couldn't understand this topic from my book but the way u taught me was totally unbelievable....lots of love from Kashmir india
this video is really helpful for me thank you sir first time on UA-cam I got the exactly same concept that relevant to the book I have exam after 3hrs this video is life saving for me Allah blessed you
I highly appreciate your dedication and conviction to make us understand. You have a beautiful way of explaining in depth!!! We don't have teachers like you.... I really respect and appreciate your efficient and effective efforts 👏
What I gather from your lecture is that fallibilism is an approach that favours the deductive approach. If that is the case, why are the two approaches added separately in the course. If they are different, then what basically is the difference between the two?
Verily, the rational comprehension of various phenomena differs among different philosophers. Owing to which, they philosophize differently. Same is the case here. The Deductive Methods of Aristotle and Karl Popper deal with logical reasoning in a different manner. Deductive Method of Aristotle is actually a syllogism, which is the base of formal logic. This formal logic is a separate branch of philosophy, founded by Aristotle. Aristotelian syllogism revolves around the structure, components and validity of arguments. Unfortunately, Logic is not included in the syllabus of CSS. This is why, students are asked to have a general idea about the Aristotelian Logic. Otherwise, the syllogism of Aristotle is not that simple. Contrarily, Deductive method of Karl Popper deals with logical reasoning in general rather than as a formal logic. As he was greatly influenced by the Deductive Method of Aristotle, he developed his own philosophical method with a touch of deductive approach. His Falsification principle not only pinpoints the flaws in the classical inductive approach, but also assists in checking the validity of scientific knowledge through using deductive approach.
Fallibilism is the philosophical claim that no belief can have justification that guarantees the truth of the belief, or that no beliefs are certain. Is this statement true? If true then why didn't you discuss beliefs in your lecture?
You are absolutely right. Fallibilism is a detailed Philosophical School of Thought which comes under the realm of Epistemology. Peirce, Hume, Descartes etc have their own sayings and explainations on it. But, here we are talking about fallibilism as a Philosophical Method, given by Karl Popper. We use a slightly different approach here. Principle of Falsification is applied here. It is in my plan to make a detailed video on Fallibilism. Discussing the beliefs, examples, comparing and contrasting.
Vidéo dekh Kar Bahot Kuch learn kia our Bahot hehi acha samjia
Informative ❤❤❤❤
I was in philosophy of science and today i gave the test on this test and i watch this video before test and it really helps me to better undaunted demarcation problem thanx sir 🙏
Thank you so much yrrr
Very well explained, now after listening lecture i can easily attempt question
Sir, u made the philosophy so much easier for us . May the good Lord reward u many fold for it❤
Thank you so much sir for such a wonderful lecture..❤
Amazing lecture.
Shukriya
Thank you sir
I'm a Student of Tripura University, India and by your Video I really got the this topic very easy ❤️🥹
Help ful video sir❤
Sir honestly speaking i couldn't understand this topic from my book but the way u taught me was totally unbelievable....lots of love from Kashmir india
Great sir ❤🙏
Brilliant job keep it up
Outstanding way of teaching
Love you sir... Iss tira smjaya k uni k teacher nay bhi nahi smjaya tha... May Allah fulfill your dreams ❤️
Ameen. And Shukriya... Stay Blessed 😇
Snjh agai... Sir plz make more videos of philosophy.. ap bht acha clear krte hn
I will try my best...
Awesome
behtareeen smjhaya
Thank you so much sir for your well- explanation.
Amazing and Cristal clear ...
Very nice way of teaching
Thanks a Bunch...
Thankyou sir, watched your video from india 🇮🇳
Lot's of knowledge we gain
Thank uuu so much sir really very nice lecture
Exceptionally explained.
Hats off to you Sir. Your way of explaining the facts is amazing. ❤
Thnk u sir... really appreciated work
You are always welcome...
THANKS FOR THE GOOD LECTURE
Gr8 gr8 lecture
wow nice explanation
this video is really helpful for me thank you sir first time on UA-cam I got the exactly same concept that relevant to the book I have exam after 3hrs this video is life saving for me Allah blessed you
Ameen... Stay Blessed...
Impressive lecture ❤❤❤
Bahut badiya
Super explanation sir
Thank you so going into detail of every term!
Mind-blowing excellent this is the right way of teaching ❤️
Shukriya...
Bhai accha laga..😊
From India🇮🇳
Amazing lecture. All doubts cleared. And urdu in between was so sweet to ears. Thank you for this lecture.
You are always welcome Dear... Stay Blessed and Stay Happy... 😇
Excellent thanks sir
I highly appreciate your dedication and conviction to make us understand. You have a beautiful way of explaining in depth!!! We don't have teachers like you.... I really respect and appreciate your efficient and effective efforts 👏
Thanks a Bunch Dear .
Great sir
thank you so much sir your lectures r really helpful your way of explaining is excellent
Shukriya. New Lecture Uploaded... Watch Plato's Idealism
Best teacher
Highly appreciated 🙏 what an understanding lecture really amazing
Thanks a Bunch...
Vip approach
Thank you so much 🙏... good explanation
You are always welcome
Please upload more lectures
Well explain sir
Can you evaluate my question of philosophy.i am preparing for css
May ALLAH bless you more sir
Bhot Bhot Shukriya...
bht zabardast
Shukriya
For me philosophy was the most boring subject but sir your way of teaching is amazing thanks allottttttt❤
You are always welcome
Amazingggggggggggggg❤❤❤
Thanks
You are always welcome Dear...
Thank you sir 🙏💕 my gratitude to you 😊
Very stimulating lectures and brilliantly taught 😊
Shukriya
You are great sir
Bhot Bhot Shukriya 💖
thankyou
Outstanding
Shukriya...
Very informative 👍👍💫
Bundle of Thanks Dear
Thanks....from Bangladesh
You are always welcome...
Sir please upload lectures on epistemology, ontology, Muslim and contemporary philosophers too, JazakAllah hu khairan
I will try my best...
Nice sir. I am from Nepal
Thanks... And You are always welcome Dear...
Best teacher❤💯
Thanks a Bunch...
Thank you sir 🙏🙏🙏
You are always welcome...
Love ur lectures ... They r really easy to understand
Please share the lectures on epistemology, ontology, Muslim and contemporary philosophers too.
Thanks a Bunch...
sir❤
Philosophy of apperance and reality plzz sir upload video
Hats of to you sir kindly philosophy KY lye book bhe bata dyn preparation KY lye
Apko market visit karna hoga... Kyunki, mujhy idea nahi k css philosophy k lye market mein konsi book available hai...
Sir philosophy of mind plzz upload video
Your way of explanation is brilliant!
Thanks a Bunch Dear ..
What I gather from your lecture is that fallibilism is an approach that favours the deductive approach. If that is the case, why are the two approaches added separately in the course. If they are different, then what basically is the difference between the two?
Verily, the rational comprehension of various phenomena differs among different philosophers. Owing to which, they philosophize differently. Same is the case here. The Deductive Methods of Aristotle and Karl Popper deal with logical reasoning in a different manner.
Deductive Method of Aristotle is actually a syllogism, which is the base of formal logic. This formal logic is a separate branch of philosophy, founded by Aristotle. Aristotelian syllogism revolves around the structure, components and validity of arguments. Unfortunately, Logic is not included in the syllabus of CSS. This is why, students are asked to have a general idea about the Aristotelian Logic. Otherwise, the syllogism of Aristotle is not that simple.
Contrarily, Deductive method of Karl Popper deals with logical reasoning in general rather than as a formal logic. As he was greatly influenced by the Deductive Method of Aristotle, he developed his own philosophical method with a touch of deductive approach. His Falsification principle not only pinpoints the flaws in the classical inductive approach, but also assists in checking the validity of scientific knowledge through using deductive approach.
No one can compete you sir
Shukriya
Keep it up bro!
Bhot Shukriya ♥️♥️
1 mistake at the last slide: Popper's method doesn't give "certain" knowledge, it gives provisional knowledge.
Samjh agai
Sir please also add criticism on each method in your videos.
Okay
Sir please upload lectures on rationalism (Plato, Descartes, Spinoza) and empiricism (locke, Berkeley, Hume).
I will try my best
@@lecturesbyWaqasAziz Thank you sir
Sir, also make lecture video on his critique of " The open society and it's enemies". Thank you
Okay. But after sometime
Brilliant lecture Sir .Sir ap k pas agr pdf mn notes hain to link share Karen plz
Sir plzz cover remaining philosophers
Karl popper ki rest philosophies par kya videos nahi hain?
Ma'am safia Bano❤
Thankyou for defining it in such an easy way. I wanted to ask if his logical method and Fallibilism are same or not??
It is same... His logical method is known as Fallibilism or Falsification....
@@lecturesbyWaqasAziz thankyou so much
Ultiimate discuusion sir. Thank You . But any video of yours on KHUN THOMAS theory
No
Please make lectures on Kpk pms philosophy
how long will the scientist wait for searching contradictory evidences to confirm a theory?
Sir you gave example of crow , c1 black c2 black....c11 black , all crows are black , is it deductive or inductive ?
Crow 1 is black
Crow 2 is black
Crow 3 is black
Probably, all crows are black
This is a classical inductive argument...
❤❤❤
Sir Can we make conclusion on the basis of majority evidences ?
Sorry, didn't get your point... What kind of majority evidences???
Sir please explain Kant's Copernican revolution and moral proof for God existence
I will try my best... Don't worry
Sir, recommend a good book for philosophy please
Drop a text on my Gmail waqasaziz85@gmail.com
A.o.a sir!!
I have a question, sir hum start outline sy hi krein gy ya fallibilism sy Jo KY AP ny btaya??
Agar outline sy start karein gy to zyada best lagy ga...
Sir plz upload video on David hume cause and effect theory
I will try my best... But, I am out of station...
OK sir 🙏
Thomas kuhan py b lecture upload kr dein
I will try my best...
👍👍
Fallibilism is the philosophical claim that no belief can have justification that guarantees the truth of the belief, or that no beliefs are certain. Is this statement true? If true then why didn't you discuss beliefs in your lecture?
You are absolutely right. Fallibilism is a detailed Philosophical School of Thought which comes under the realm of Epistemology. Peirce, Hume, Descartes etc have their own sayings and explainations on it. But, here we are talking about fallibilism as a Philosophical Method, given by Karl Popper. We use a slightly different approach here. Principle of Falsification is applied here. It is in my plan to make a detailed video on Fallibilism. Discussing the beliefs, examples, comparing and contrasting.
Sir can we add quotations in question according to paragraph?
Yes... Definitely... You can even highlight those questions... It will create a Good and Mature impression...
sir, please make videos on existentialism and pragmatism
InshaAllah.... These days I am a bit bzy. But, soon I will be uploading lectures on existentialism and pragmatism... Don't worry
@@lecturesbyWaqasAziz thank you sir
Common sense realism ki video please sir
I will try my best
🖤🖤🖤