nice video! I think you need to change the seismic intensity notation. In Japanese Shindo scale, there are 0,1,2,3,4,5-,5+,6-,6+,7. 1-,1+,2-,2+,3-,3+,4-,4+ is not exist For example, when the calculated seismic intensity is 3.5 to 4.0 or 4.0~4.5, do not use 4-or4+ It's '4'
I know it doesn't exist officially, but it can be inferred so I made an informal decision. Quakes don't just have 7 levels but an infinite combination of acceleration levels, PGV, PGD etc. Honestly the best way to describe the shaking in videos would be to express the acceleration in G units. :)
A while ago i had a look into the intensity Archive by JMA. Lowest Magnitudes recorded for each damaging Shindo Level: Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 7: M 6.5 on 14th April 2016 in 益城町宮園 (Greater Kumamoto) Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 6+: M 5.8 on 16th April 2016 in 産山村山鹿 (Near Mount Aso) Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 6: M 6.1 on 15th July 1941 in 長野市箱清水 (Northern Nagano Prefecture) Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 6-: M 5.1 on 18th August 2000 in 新島村式根島 (Izu Islands) and 03rd January 2019 in 和水町江田 (Greater Kumamoto) Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 5+: M 4.5 on 05th October 2011 in 菊池市旭志 (Greater Kumamoto) and 29th April 2016 in 由布市湯布院町川上 (in Oita Prefecture, a Kumamoto Aftershock as well) Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 5: M 3.7 on 20th October 1992 in 竹富町西表 (Miyakojima, OS Taiwan) Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 5-: M 3.7 on 12th March 2011 in 栄村北信 (in Northern Nagano) Note, that before 1996, there were no Lower and Upper 5 and 6. These got introduced after the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake.
Very well made I'd want to point out that the Japanese Shindo Scale only consists of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5-, 5+, 6-, 6+ and 7 Japan Shindo 1-, 1+, 2-, 2+, 3-, 3+, 4-, 4+ don't exist (although it could be a good idea for a hypothetical Shindo scale) And to convert it we do this (rough but close enough) MMI → JMA Shindo 1 → 0 2 → 1 3 → 2 4 → 3 5 → 4 6 → 5- 7 → 5+ 8 → 6- 9 → 6+ ≥10 → 7 And also next time do Shindo 2.1, 3.6, 4.6 instead of 2-, 4- JMA Int. → Shindo ≤0.4 → 0 0.5 - 1.4 → 1 1.5 - 2.4 → 2 2.5 - 3.4 → 3 3.5 - 4.4 → 4 4.5 - 4.9 → 5- 5.0 - 5.4 → 5+ 5.5 - 5.9 → 6- 6.0 - 6.4 → 6+ ≥6.5 → 7 Cheers!
In and around the city of Hollister, CA, there are buildings and a winery are are built on top of fault traces, and the winery has had extensive damage due to slow creep. The Caleveras fault, part of the San Andreas system, passes underneath the town. Nice house, BTW. I'm imagining a family coming home from a vacation to find their house destroyed by a major quake.
California needs to take a page from Japan and China and build to stand 9.0 and greater-9.5 as a maximum at least! At 7.5 the illustrated home here is completely destroyed! Same home in Japan or China would still be standing! Non-ductile spring suspensions would help! This from a Californian who lived through Loma Prieta in 89 and Northridge in 94.
Compare USGS shakemaps to JMA intensity maps and you will see a rough correlation: Shindo 0 = Mercalli I Shindo 1 = Mercalli II Shindo 2 = Mercalli III Shindo 3 = Mercalli IV Shindo 4 = Mercalli V Shindo 5-= Mercalli VI Shindo 5+ = Mercalli VII Shindo 6- = Mercalli VIII Shindo 6+ = Mercalli IX Shindo 7 = Mercalli X There is no 2-, 2+, 3-, 3+, 4-, 4+ on the Shindo scale
yes, but the issue appears when you use all 12 levels on the Modified Mercalli Scale. So I thought of informally expressing more categories. Ultimately, numbers/levels are just helping us to get an idea of what we are expressing. They are not absolute
nice video!
I think you need to change the seismic intensity notation.
In Japanese Shindo scale, there are 0,1,2,3,4,5-,5+,6-,6+,7.
1-,1+,2-,2+,3-,3+,4-,4+ is not exist
For example, when the calculated seismic intensity is 3.5 to 4.0 or 4.0~4.5, do not use 4-or4+
It's '4'
was thinking the same...
I know it doesn't exist officially, but it can be inferred so I made an informal decision. Quakes don't just have 7 levels but an infinite combination of acceleration levels, PGV, PGD etc. Honestly the best way to describe the shaking in videos would be to express the acceleration in G units. :)
Finally! And thank you for adding the antenna.
A while ago i had a look into the intensity Archive by JMA. Lowest Magnitudes recorded for each damaging Shindo Level:
Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 7: M 6.5 on 14th April 2016 in 益城町宮園 (Greater Kumamoto)
Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 6+: M 5.8 on 16th April 2016 in 産山村山鹿 (Near Mount Aso)
Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 6: M 6.1 on 15th July 1941 in 長野市箱清水 (Northern Nagano Prefecture)
Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 6-: M 5.1 on 18th August 2000 in 新島村式根島 (Izu Islands) and 03rd January 2019 in 和水町江田 (Greater Kumamoto)
Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 5+: M 4.5 on 05th October 2011 in 菊池市旭志 (Greater Kumamoto) and 29th April 2016 in 由布市湯布院町川上 (in Oita Prefecture, a Kumamoto Aftershock as well)
Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 5: M 3.7 on 20th October 1992 in 竹富町西表 (Miyakojima, OS Taiwan)
Lowest Magnitude for Shindo 5-: M 3.7 on 12th March 2011 in 栄村北信 (in Northern Nagano)
Note, that before 1996, there were no Lower and Upper 5 and 6. These got introduced after the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake.
The table is the true MVP, bro never flipper over
Nor the car
No those two stools that never flipped
Very well made
I'd want to point out that the Japanese Shindo Scale only consists of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5-, 5+, 6-, 6+ and 7
Japan Shindo 1-, 1+, 2-, 2+, 3-, 3+, 4-, 4+ don't exist (although it could be a good idea for a hypothetical Shindo scale)
And to convert it we do this (rough but close enough)
MMI → JMA Shindo
1 → 0
2 → 1
3 → 2
4 → 3
5 → 4
6 → 5-
7 → 5+
8 → 6-
9 → 6+
≥10 → 7
And also next time do Shindo 2.1, 3.6, 4.6 instead of 2-, 4-
JMA Int. → Shindo
≤0.4 → 0
0.5 - 1.4 → 1
1.5 - 2.4 → 2
2.5 - 3.4 → 3
3.5 - 4.4 → 4
4.5 - 4.9 → 5-
5.0 - 5.4 → 5+
5.5 - 5.9 → 6-
6.0 - 6.4 → 6+
≥6.5 → 7
Cheers!
Awesome video, as always! I think it would be really cool to see some sort of rock formation, like Delicate Arch in Utah?
You're background sound its so scary/creepy if i speed at 2x 😢😮
This tile and the house on it... Damn, I can't shake the association with the computer game series The Sims. 🤣
In and around the city of Hollister, CA, there are buildings and a winery are are built on top of fault traces, and the winery has had extensive damage due to slow creep. The Caleveras fault, part of the San Andreas system, passes underneath the town. Nice house, BTW. I'm imagining a family coming home from a vacation to find their house destroyed by a major quake.
California needs to take a page from Japan and China and build to stand 9.0 and greater-9.5 as a maximum at least! At 7.5 the illustrated home here is completely destroyed! Same home in Japan or China would still be standing! Non-ductile spring suspensions would help! This from a Californian who lived through Loma Prieta in 89 and Northridge in 94.
I watched the prem :)
Fun watching globalquake with you :D
thanks once again!! same!
I felt 5.4 magnitude earthquake in Baku, Azerbaijan (December 7 2023)
I would recommend if you Post videos during the day time
love your videos 😍
Thanks for watching🙃👍
Hello, earthquakesim I love your videos!
thanks for being here!
No problem!
Love the detail 🎉🎉
Thank you so much!!
I hope you can do full time earthquakes in the future, since 7 and up are usually +30 seconds long, love your videos ❤
I'm thinking of making a separate video simulating a 9.0 quake.
@@EarthquakeSim Well that's gonna be like 3 minutes long ig but goodluck!
@@yakistolfo I'd say 4 minutes at least. Maybe 5.
@@EarthquakeSim i though It's A Tropical Island House...
@@EarthquakeSim idea. The chile 9.5 quake in a video with explanation and some of the effects on buildings
Compare USGS shakemaps to JMA intensity maps and you will see a rough correlation:
Shindo 0 = Mercalli I
Shindo 1 = Mercalli II
Shindo 2 = Mercalli III
Shindo 3 = Mercalli IV
Shindo 4 = Mercalli V
Shindo 5-= Mercalli VI
Shindo 5+ = Mercalli VII
Shindo 6- = Mercalli VIII
Shindo 6+ = Mercalli IX
Shindo 7 = Mercalli X
There is no 2-, 2+, 3-, 3+, 4-, 4+ on the Shindo scale
yes, but the issue appears when you use all 12 levels on the Modified Mercalli Scale. So I thought of informally expressing more categories. Ultimately, numbers/levels are just helping us to get an idea of what we are expressing. They are not absolute
Shindo scale is new here. Like that little touch
I love your videos even i liked, subscribed, and comment to you😊❤
Earthquake sim your video is education
thank you so much for watching!
Herzaman aklıma türkiyedeki deprem geliyor
Istanbuldan sevgiler
Istanbul : M7,1 before 2050
That was awesome! I ll enjoyed it
I always enjoy watching my new simulations with you!
@@EarthquakeSim it s fun also talking about our shared hobby geology
@@wilcofaber9863 there's so much to learn, always!
@@EarthquakeSim yes. And earthquakes and volcano s can still suprise us.
5:29 the furnace just kiss the table
Aww the livestream is finished
THE MAGNITUDE 8.0 its like a earthquake from 2012 movie (2009)😊❤❤❤ I LOVE THIS
Yes. That movie was fun. Earthquake tsunami everything
Yes
Can you do suggestions next
2012 reference because its a californian house and it have a earthquake in the movie
Why no 7.1?
7.5 asi me imagino el terremoto en Guatemala del 76
The house looks like a Mexican house
I prefer the video with the sound of the earthquake, instead the music!!
I wanna see how this house in a 9.1 earthquake 👍
I guarantee you won’t see a difference in terms of damage
@@EarthquakeSimi mean i also want to get a scale of how bad the shaking would be
Woah
So, my takeaway from this is: Whenever an earthquake hits, find the nearest swing and RIDE IT OUT!
I have a idea for a video earthquake matatudes in a bathroom
China have an earthquake my grandparents and my children is doomed hope they're safe 😢
I back
nule
sas
Poppooppooopp