❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
@@tgx6288 by a live debat its get proved that who is fooling if you think your father is right then bring him to the channel of sanatan samikasha(kushwaha ji ) he will put your propaganda in your ###
He wants to say that there is nothing in Hindu scriptures. He is just finding mistakes from modern science from videos and grabbing the audience from his channel. Even the best universities work on Hindu Scriptures not only in India others also.
There are some people in India who says Bhaskara and Kerala School discovered Calculus and Newton/ Leibniz Stole it from Indians. Please debunk it. Yes ! Bhaskara had some concepts of Derivatives but never came up with the concept of Differentiation , Kerala School build upon it . But if we read atleast Newton's Method of Fluxions we can clearly see he came to it by his own way .
I have seen this phenomenon in Arabs and Indians people who found similarities in any concept for two different reasons but they don't know how civilizations influence others even if they don't know each other. About this context, people's view is binary therefore improper presentation just leads to conflict. If someone wanted to say this then he has to represent this thing properly, I don't think Kshitij is good for that, still if he does then it's good.
@tdj461 He is the ideal man for debunking these , Today even CK Rajju and his student chavda goes on saying Indian Ganita superior than Western Maths , how is it Is there anything Eastern / Western in Maths ?? Gal groups discovered by Galois , Number Fields discovered by Germans . Etale Cohomology discovered by Grothendieck.
@@TopeshMitterAssociating the knowledge with any region or ethnicity is foolish, they should be debunked but there is a difference between "This discovered in India" and "This stolen from India" and there many interpretations of the same thing. As far as I have seen Kshitij, he is not a guy who can communicate to the other side clearly. No matter how true someone is, but if he doesn't know the other side's belief, he couldn't accomplish his views. Still I encourage him to do it. Btw, what do you think about the Indian Knowledge System? Few people criticise it for any type of pseudo science it could spread but I think it should be criticised for other reasons because the government could filter it and then can introduce it. My reason to criticise it is that it is an implising World or West is a separate entity to India, so we just introduced India's knowledge, that's the reason. If anyone wants to prevent any ancient knowledge then he should reduce it with modern subjects and contribute to academia instead of making own academia. In my college we got a minor subject, I read it's around 300 MCQs and found only one or two pseudo science related content, the other was about history, architecture and literature. My stance is that it should be included in those corresponding subjects instead of making new so-called *Indian* subjects. Edit: If ancient people were able to communicate with each other, their methodologies would not differ and then there was no such thing like that. Also these types of people should question why they are not storing IKS or Ganita on paper, why are they using East Asian technology based Western Computers for storing that data? 😂
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Heisenberg was influenced by conversations with Rabindranath Tagore, where they discussed the metaphysical ideas in Indian philosophy. The philosophical perspectives of interconnectedness and the nature of reality resonated with the emerging principles of quantum mechanics, which Heisenberg helped pioneer. He is claiming vedas are wrong by using vedas what a irony 😂😂 Arpit sir mohit guar pata hai
It may be possible that Heisenberg was influenced by philosophical ideas that but he had built up mathematical and physical backing of his theory by own.
So did you or he challenged every statement or theory or fact given by scientists or just accepted their sayings? Did you guys do lab tests to verify the concepts or not? Do you guys understand that religion and science don't share the same domian?
@kashanrizvi3419 Science is challenged everyday. That is why we were able to go to the moon, invent a covid vaccine etc. Religion is just people following the will of claimed god without asking why did god decided to kill 10 newborns in jhansi fire or why god just watched bilkis bano getting raped etc.
@@kashanrizvi3419... No they don't, religion is concerned about morality and immaterial realm which science has very less to comment upon as it's primarily concerned with matter. That said, you clearly do not understand the concept of fact, theory and hypothesis. Facts are the basis, the foundation upon which one stands and measures the truth value of hypothesis which become a theory in case of a tautology and the model is constantly refined, this process does not claim infallibility like religion but always remains open to counter evidence which is convincing and capable of going thru the scientific process of validation and experimentation... Anyways, please tell me I'm not wasting my time on you as your mind is too thick with pseudo science and religion to even open up an inch to something called reason, as I'm clearly feeling by the end of this reply that I have wasted my time
Thanks for this video. Nowadays Vishal has gone overboard with the idea that everything science has done is already available in vedas and related texts.
What Vedanta teaches is metaphysics and philosophy. Epistemologically it doesn't have much credibility. These are just few ideas in a cease pool of many different idea. You can choose to believe those ideas or not. Science deals with things we can verify. For example, it is scientific fact that life exists. We can verify it. Now what you make of life is a different question. You can find purpose or meaning of it but those are all metaphysical attributes. For example, you can believe god or some higher power has given you a purpose in life and you may do your best to find that and maybe eventually you'll end up finding that purpose but there is really no way to know if that purpose is truly your purpose or heck if even purpose exists or not. Therefore, you just have to belief in what suits you. Tell me one example of such thing that Vedanta teaches you which is more advanced that science and tell in what sense it is more advanced. this is a genuine question
@upamanyu.baishya , Read vedanta, For example Read Drg Drsya Viveka, Aparokshanubhuti, Aatma Bodha, Mandukya Upanishad etc books to know what vedanta is saying. Vedanta talks about "Brahman", the ultimate reality which is Ground of all being. Science has its limitations and hence it can never uncover Brahman. That's how Vedanta is far more advanced than Science. Purpose of life cannot be taken lightly as you put it bcz morals are based on what we think purpose of life is. Vedanta alsp gives us morals which Science can never hope to discover. So Vedanta is superior to Science in the matter of Ethics too..
Sandeep maheshwari is doing the same on his spiritual channel, why is no one talking about that ??? 🤔🤔🤔 If u don't believe that then u can go watch his advanced spirituality part 6 . He was trying to explain the sound of silence mathematically 😢 ( I am not saying that he is completely wrong because that's not my expertise but some one should question him , he has a great influence)
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Hello Sir I Harshad from Nagpur pursuing my BS in Physics. I frequently watch your videos for my academics as well as for scientific temperament.And I am looking forward for my Ms in nanotechnology.So there is miniscule suggestion from your student, while giving any statement of any scientist there is necessity to come with written form in there book or an audio clip for that statement. I know it's not possible every time but as a student we must know the resources. And thank you for explanation.
what a beautiful explanation 😍, kitna complicated kar rakhe the sabne but now it's really easy to understand the double slit experiment, thank you so much for this valuable information
knowing or making content about culture and religion is not bad, but they manipulate scientific theories according to their own need and misinform people , thanks for explaining in detail
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
"Photons are everywhere, like in the form of visible light. So why don’t these photons interact with electrons and collapse their wave nature all the time? How does the wave behavior of electrons remain unaffected in everyday conditions?" I'm naive please don't judge if i have asked basic.
आम जनमानस की समस्या यह है कि उनको न Spirituality का ज्यादा पता होता है और न Science का। विशाल जैसे लोग भारी या confusing शब्दों का प्रयोग कर लोगों को उलझा देते हैं। लोगों को न Non duality के Concept की समझ होती है और न ही Quantum Physics का और न ही लोगो को इन चीजों की गहराई में जाकर तथ्यों की जाँच पडताल करनी होती है। लोग तो आजकल अपने धर्म, देश जाति प्रदेश भाषा संस्कृति पर गर्व करने के लिए तैयार होके बैठे रहते हैं।
Vishal jo bhee apne video mein bataate hain vo satik hain..tum log ab thoda science padh liye ho aur mann mein khujli aagayi hain ki khud kaa science tera Vishal jee se sahi hain .. bewkuf hain tu...kyunki Vishal jitna science aur grantho mein samanta bataate hain vo bilkul sahi hota hain..aur unki science jo ki quantum physics kaa bataate hain vo best hain..kyunki maine sirf quantum physics par hee study kiya hain
@@ranjeetrawat9831 bhai tu pseudoscience par toh bilkul bahas mat kar...chal aaja challenge karte hain ek dusare ko..tu proof de ki Vishal jee pseudoscience hee bolte rahte hain ...but Vishal jee ke video par mat jaana kyunki unhone tum jaiso kaa confusion door karne ke liye hee pseudoscience bola tha..pseudoscience kaa reality tu mujhe mat samjha...matlab grantho se science nahin nikala.. evidence de tu...main un scientist kaa book tujhe dikhaaunga jisme unhone mention Kiya hua hain ki kaun see science grantho se liya gaya hain..aaza challenge karte hain ek dusare ko.. evidence dene ke liye taiyaar ho jaa..page number bol aur book kaa name bata kar .
@@ranjeetrawat9831mereko non duality ke baare mein nahin pata..bhai tu non duality ke hee baare mein bata de . explain me..aur jitna youtube hain search karne non duality par dekh le aur phir mujhe explain kar bhai..phir bhee tera gyaan galat ho jaayega ..ab tu soch gahan adhyayan karna padta hain gyaan paane ke liye..tu soch raha hain ki youtube par log non duality ko ek dum sahi se defined karte jin toh tu thoda galat sochta hain...check kar le
Bhai aap keh rahe hain " dekho saare bade scientist keh rahe hain ki consciosness ka lena dena nahi hai QM se to nahi hoga " . Ye kaisi argument hai. Aap bol sakte hain ki koi consensus nahi hai . Nobody knows hence hyperquest ko aise claims nahi karne chahiye
When there's only single slit, and we trigger electrons without any pre-slit observations, we still get a single line on the screen. That means it's gone through the slit as a particle, not a wave. Why is this happening without any observation, any wave collapse ?
The band pattern is a result of interference of two waves. For a single slit, there will be neither an interference nor a single band, but a diffraction pattern.
quantam particles always act like a wave and in superposition only if we isolate them in experiments, quantam particles are not literally wave they just act like a wave mathematically and physically, and they always are in superposition, but when they have more than 1 probability (more than 1 slit) then they interfere with itself like a wave, that's why we see wave pattern on detector screen
Agar photon collide krta electron se to vo particle hota ... Jab hum koi light ni marte electron pr tab kya veh dark me tha .... ?? Means light to harjagah ha to electron tab kuy ni krta interact ...jab specially light ki jati tab hi kuy particle hojata?
Young's Double Slit Experiment ko bina light ke hi perform kiya jaata hai. Sirf screen par detectors hote hain jo interference pattern ko detect kar sakein. Koi additional disturbance nahin hota hai. Agar slits par detectors laga do to wave function collapse ho jaata hai, jis wajah se screen par interference pattern nahin milta.
@rohittekchandani5720 jab hum observer rakhte sirf tab hi photon interact krta usse or camera tak jata ? ...jab koi camera ni rkhaa to photon kaha par tha kya kr rha tha?
8:50 : कृष्ण कहते है की सब प्रकृति के गुणों से होता है । और हम जो चेतना है उसे हम अहंकार भी बोल सकते है उसे लगता है की मैं ने किया , मैं कररहा हू और Quantum mechanics का विषय लो तो मेने देखा इसलिए पार्टिकल का गुण चेंज हुवा 🤣🤣 ऐसे है हम अहंकारी ( चेतना ) । ये अहंकार के चलते हमारे मुर्ख धार्मिक लोग विज्ञान का अपमान करते है ।
Wave travel karti hai to wave ki tarah ? Ye kaisi samajh hai. Jab tak observation nahi hua , tab tak particle exists only as a probability function , which can be said to be wave like. Particle existz in superpsition , meaning with probability less than one in all possible positions Copenhagen interpretation says that nothing can be said about what really happened on observation because the wave function is purely mathematical. Copenhagen interpretation is purely epistemological. It means there may or may not be a quantum world, QM just describes interactions in probabilistic / mathematical terms
quantam particles always act like a wave and in superposition only if we isolate them in experiments, quantam particles are not literally wave they just act like a wave mathematically and physically, and they always are in superposition, but when they have more than 1 probability (more than 1 slit) then they interfere with itself like a wave, that's why we see wave pattern on detector screen
Brother only consciousness exist in the universe or multiverse.you guys have limited knowledge to understand consciousness likewise classical and quantum scientists.so you are right to some extent to understand the level of theoretical physics where scientists unable to answer about consciousness or energy on how and by whom this universe operates.
Bhai. Aajtak koi consensus nahi hai about what QM means. Aapko saare interpretation batane chahiye. David Bohm 's pilot wave, Hugh Everett's many worlds, Chris Fuchs Qubism, Copenhagrlen. There is no correct interpretations
But without a subject there is no World as an object when the illusion of ego " i " dissolves there is only pure existence with no subject or object I think he was trying to say that when the illusion of a subject is created the world as an object is created without the illusion both are one when Advita say world is created by the observer it means world as an object exist only because of the subject without the subject its just pure existence ( Bhraman)
Oh man thanks, finally someone talked about this. The first time I heard about observer effect was from a reel where Neil deGrass Tyson was talking about it, and in that clip he said "How does the electron know that we are watching it" and the video ends. I wanted to know more about it and ChatGpt suggested Feynman lectures. I understood nothing but I kept at it and reread the chapters and then when things clicked. My first thought was that N.dg. tyson should have never said that...
Bro why are you using wrong graphics for observed particles after double slit. That really causes major confusion among my classmates during the quantum mechanics course. Confusion was so much that a simple interpretation of low intensity photos and electron detection experiments was unacceptable to them. Please show them the gaussian distribution instead of two lines.
Also there is no correct interpretation of QM. Koi consensus nahi hai. Qubism is also an interpretation which brings in consciousness. Hugh Everett ki many worlds interpretation bhi hai which says quantum collapse is happening in multiple universes.
Hi. I'd just like to pose a somewhat related argumet here! My proposition is that when the entire act of measurement either by device or by naked eye (although, i dont even know if experimental outcomes in modern physics can be perceived by naked eye 😅) is the reason of probability wavefn getting collapsed then isn't it, in a macro perspective, seems plausable that existance of observer is the reason of observable reality is becoming 'real', in the literal sense of the word?? Altough it delves into a bit philosophy and metaphysics but still there is a cultural enigma going on within the human intellectual spheres that demonstrates this fude between concepts like existance, non-existance and an "indifferent universe"(well i dont even know if the universe can feel or not feel indifference at all 🤣) Yeah, not a question though, just some thought popped up randomly! Cheers ✌🏽
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Conciousness has some role with quantum mechanics i read a research paper of on biology and quantum mechanics that has a possibility in making conciousness through superposition but its not proven
Science ke bacche zara batao 1952 me kaise yoganand pram hans ne apni body chhod di, aur wo body 20 din gak decompose nahi hui, Thoda gyaan ko samjho tab vigyaan acche se samjh aae ga. Know who you are first, आत्माबोध 🙏🏻
Nice try just look at the science lovers, they read bunch of papers released in some magazines like nature and believe in those. It's akin to what you believe that religion have books and texts and preachers which propagate stupidity and foolishness. Just in the case of followers of science, books are replaced by papers released in those magazines and preachers are replaced by scientists. These followers never verify the papers by conducting experiments or challenging the positions proposed. Oh sorry that's dogma. Multiverse can exist in view of many science followers. Pardon me did I just expose the dogma of science followers. Huh, science followers getting paranoid.
Heisenberg was influenced by conversations with Rabindranath Tagore, where they discussed the metaphysical ideas in Indian philosophy. The philosophical perspectives of interconnectedness and the nature of reality resonated with the emerging principles of quantum mechanics, which Heisenberg helped pioneer. You're claiming vedas are wrong by using vedas what a irony 😂😂
Nope , heisenburg pioneered the uncertainty principle in 1927 , and visited Mr Tagore in 1929 , so ur claim that heisenburg got influenced by metaphysical ideas given by Mr Tagore seems inaccurate to me
@@bodiminds6571 Indian philosophy, including ideas rooted in the Vedas, may not have directly influenced Heisenberg's scientific principles, his interaction with Tagore helped him connect the metaphysical aspects of Indian philosophy with his understanding of quantum theory. This meeting reinforced Heisenberg’s view that certain principles in Indian thought aligned with the emerging worldview of quantum physics.
@@bodiminds6571 Indian philosophy, including ideas rooted in the Vedas, may not have directly influenced Heisenberg's scientific principles, his interaction with Tagore helped him connect the metaphysical aspects of Indian philosophy with his understanding of quantum theory. This meeting reinforced Heisenberg’s view that certain principles in Indian thought aligned with the emerging worldview of quantum physics.
Also, Einstein jaise scientist ko quote karke bolna ki inhone kaha hai dekho, to sach hoga is frankly very stupid. Einstein ne zabardasti cosmological constant bhi ghusaya tha apne equations mein because he 'believed' in a self-contained, static universe. Debunk Hyperquest's claim on logical grounds. Do not appeal to authority. Otherwise you are same as him. He says " Vedas say.... " , while you say " Einstein said.....".
@@astrokshitij bata can you debate sanantan samiksha , if not on his platform , then a nutral channel , or any ex Muslim channel , I know you will not accept the challenge because you are fake
क्वांटम मैकेनिक्स का तो भाई ज्यादा मै कह नहीं सकता की कितना सच कितना झूठ है पर एक चीन शायद तेरी समझ में कभी भी नहीं आए पर कोशिश करना समझने की । वो बात ये है कि जिस कांशसनेस यानी चेतना की तू बात कर रहा है कि चेतना का क्वांटम मैकेनिक्स से कुछ लेना देना नहीं है और ऑब्जर्वेशन की तू बात कर रहा है तो भाई वास्तव में हर चीज सिर्फ इसकी बात नहीं को ऑब्जर्व करने वाली चेतना ही है । बिना चेतना के कुछ भी ऑब्जर्व किया ही नहीं जा सकता फिर वो वेव है या पार्टिकल क्या ही फर्क पड़ेगा । और जिस के बदबूते पर तू खुद का अस्तित्व मानता है वो शरीर नहीं है वो भी चेतना ही है ।
Penrose also supports the idea that consciousness is linked to quantum physics( along with hameroff- although with few supporters in the academia) and prominent rationalist youtubers like sabine hossenfelder although expressing scepticism and reservations have opened upto the possibility that their may be truth to this idea. In lieu of Patricia Churchland's and dennetian propositions you have simplify accepted the argument that these ideas constitute pseudscience upfront. I mostly like you bashing religious interpretations and regressive intrusions infecting the public scientific discourse. I would argue you need to engage more with philosophers of science, postmodernist interpretations of science, a little bit of epistemic humility and digging deep into what experts themselves see gives a picture that *most* stuff in quantum physics, science of consciousness is *contested* right to the level of the very foundations .Also, popper's falsifiability criterion although important doesn't permeate everything and is actually questioned by most philosophers of science like sean caroll and Massimo pigilluci with many of them favouring quine's bundle of hypothesis, some following kuhnian ideas among others.
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Tu Vishal k hyper quest k video pr video bna kr apna career banane ki soch rha he pr vo hoga nhi bhai kyuk orginal orginal hota he ....aur Vishal k video sirf apne video banane ke liye mt dekha kr suna b kr shi se
Can this proves that islam has a critical error ? In islam Allah is a all-knowing entity, as you know that in quran and hadith there are many lines written which can be used in a positive way as well as negative way. And as you know many people used these lines to kill millions. Allah already knew that if he wrote these lines then it leads to misconception and leads to mass killing, then why does he choosed to write in that manner even if he knew the brutal consequences. It actually shows that it actually not written by any higher entity like god , and the remaining writers left are no other than humans.🥳
Take the pain to quote some verses with examples and effects of misinterpretation leading to loss of life of millions. And as footnote take it. If you think Islam nd rulings are only from Quran then you are naive like 3rd garder trying to teach graduates in science. There is Quran and Hadith and seerah as well. If you say that but Quran has this or that then science also has books at different levels which doens't give clear and full understand of concepts which may lead wrong understanding.
@@yourguyin2554 A simple youtube search shows we do have proof. The manuscript has been carbon dated to 6th-7th century by University of Birmingham and is held by the same.
“Access to the Vedas is the greatest privilege this century may claim over all previous centuries” is a quote by J. Robert Oppenheimer, the physicist who developed the atomic bomb. - J. Robert Oppenheimer , Now who is right J. Robert Oppenheimer or Kshitij ?
IDK whats the problem this man is littlary sickk baat baat pe scriptures ko target karta hai , and logon ko target karta hai , haan bhaii tuu sick ha tuu unnlogon ko refrence banaa rhaa hai jo log thode se weak hain scriptures me , but still try their ki kuch aur deep jaaye par tuu bhai tittle saise deta hai jaise ttuujhey thekaa milaa hai science bacchaane ko .
अरे तूने तो quantum wave function collapse की सही प्रमाणित interpretation दें दी है जाकर सीधे nobel prize ले, यहां UA-cam पर बैठकर क्यों फर्जी ज्ञान पेल रहा है और लोगों को मूर्ख बना रहा है
Bhayia you can correct me but i think hyper quest is not proving that quantum physics is in sankhaya darshan but showing that conciousness and quantum level mechanisms are similar both changes there property when they are observed and much more conclusion. Yeah may be my interpretation is wrong but using Science to understand some philosophical concept or philosophy to understand science is this good way i think it is beacuse people like Niel bohr also gone through Upanishads to discover new topic that can be aligned with science yeah subject is not same like conciousness and electron in quantum mechanics but there conclusion is what matter. And bhayia why you not try some philosophy like sankhya darshan i think it will give a broader view point.
So to sum up that obviously sankhya darshan don't have formulize quantum mechanics but it explains the relation between consciousness and reality just like quantum mechanics EXPLAINS the electron and observer so the point of Hyper quest may be was he is just presenting that similar mindsets were involved in both things and he also confirmed in the video where he replied to expose and roast that he is not claiming science but trying to co relate the conclusions of science with Philosophy and I think great physict like Neil bohr and Erwin Schrodinger also done that with science and Indian philosophy and Upanishads
@@Darshanik-vedYou should be knowing one interesting thing and i .e vedic mantras have 3 meanings. 1 adidaivik: It's the topic between relation of creator and material world (how creator involved in creation, present state and destruction of materials and universe) and discuss about creators formless nature) and subtle entities that can't be seen from eyes 2. Adibhautik: Knowledge of what we see from our eyes, rules and decorum to maintain and follow for civilised and knowledgeable society and sustainability of resources of how to make use of resources 3.. adyatmik: Knowledge and principles of how to connect our soul with supreme soul.. Basically what I'm trying to say here is that ... Think of our universe as a well designed software, programmed by a creator.. the language which creator initially used is (Aum rashmi) very subtle vibration (think of it as binary language as of computer) it's a program to basically disturb muul prakriti initial state of matter to bring it to laws and principles.. Further these vibrating enties loose their subtle nature and come upto atoms electrons and molecules a higher level language (in software World) Basically binary and higher level language represent the same thing..and this is the most interesting thing vedas claim and also produced... A theory basically devloped by agnivrat nasitik using brahmanical text
@@gautam_505 Interesting but not the most because 6 Darshan like Sankhya Yog Vasesik Vedant Mimansa Nyaya dept in to the concept of ultimate consciousness and many other concepts too deep like an phd philosophy read sankhya darshan once by reading sankhya karika by ishwar Krsna with vachaspati commentary
@@gautam_505 And about Creator. I want to correct you God bhagwan or Brahmn what you like to call doens't create matter but the universe. Matter was always there which is beginningless(an assumption by darshan and science too for the sake of further exploration) and the Ishwar or Brahmn or Bhagwan manifested the matter into Universe so God is the ultimate consciousness who thinks of manifesting matter into Universe like a potter conciousness thinks to create Pot from the available Clay.
@@gautam_505 And about Creator. I want to correct you God bhagwan or Brahmn what you like to call doesn't create matter but the universe. Matter was always there which is beginning less(an assumption by darshan and science too for the sake of further exploration) and the Ishwar or Brahmn or Bhagwan manifested the matter into Universe so God is the ultimate consciousness who thinks of manifesting matter into Universe like a potter conciousness thinks to create Pot from the available Clay
@kashanrizvi3419 हा, हमारे सब निर्णय और क्रिया के पीछे कोई चेतना नहीं है हम तो सब कर्म प्रकृति के गुण से , संयोग से और शरीर के रसायन से चलता है । हमारे विचार दूसरो पे निर्भर करते है , हमारे सब गुण दूसरो से और प्रकृति से संचालित होते है , और हमे ऐसा लगता है सब हम कर रहे है । पर कृष्ण बोलते है ये सब कुछ नहीं है । चेतना जैसा कुछ नहीं है
@@semicolon6499han ab jo cheez insane ki aqal se bhahar ha consciousness jiska science bhi pata ni laga payi to ap logo ne uska inkar kardiya gravity ka bhi ni pata how its work ye dekhti kese iska inkar q ni karte conciouseness ek realty ha lekin ye ek Mistry ha how it's work
@@semicolon6499कृष्ण ने कहा कहा की चेतना जैसा कुछ नही होता, उन्होने ये कहा कि अहम कुछ नही होता, यह "I" tendency hoti है, जो अपने आप को कुछ मान बैठती है है या तादात्म्य बना लेती है जिसे फिर conciousnes bol diya जाता, तो esi conciousness तो illusion hai, par अन्ततः to keval pure consciousness hi hoti jo impersonal hoti है,yahi ultimate hai everything whatever appears in the world is superimposed on pure consciousness, which also called aatma or brhman
@rabisiddiqui6127 आप थोड़ा आंख खोले देखेंगे की तुम जो कर रहे हो वो कहा से आरहा है तो पता चलेगा कि उस केलिए कोई चेतन चीज की जरूरत नहीं है , हम एक मशीन जेसे है , एक सुंदर लड़की दिखी तो अंडर से रसायन का खेल चालू होगया , और एक भद्दी लड़की देखो तो मूड खराब होगया तो बताओ ये कोई चेतना होके का प्रमाण है क्या ? ये तो शरीर गुण और सामाजिक कंडीशंन है । तुम्हरे विचार भी चेतन नहीं है , तुम्हारा दर भी चेतन नही है , सब बाहर से प्रभावित है । ये जो में बोल रहा हु उसे प्रयोग में लाना दिमाग फट जायेगा और समझ में आएगा की चेतना ( consciousness ) जैसा कोई है ही नहीं सब Ai जेसे प्रोग्राम है प्रकृति के द्वारा ।
Depends on what stuff he refers to as "Scientific" in Vedic literature. Any such book can be written about any civilization or group of literature in the world.
Bro vo to bolta hai ki hindu dharm me pehle se nav grah diye hai par use ye nahi pata ki unhi nav grah me sun,moon bhi hai jo ki science ne planet nahi Mane hai aur rahu, ketu bhi hai jiska ko evidence nahi hai . Spreading pseudoscience only😂😂
@@arjit-mi7rw kiddo grah is not equal to planet Graha means "to seize" or "to influence" in Sanskrit. It refers to celestial bodies or forces that exert an influence on human life and events on Earth. A planet is a celestial body that orbits a star, is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, and has cleared its orbital path of debris. Ek baar google kar lete mandbudhi😑
@@kidsvideos4funYahi to dikkat hai bhai teri. Tu andhere mein jee raha hai ki tune science padi hai, aur jab tujhe actually mein science padayi jaa rahi hai (jaise is video mein) tu tune bina koyi reason diye use nakar diya. Agar tune science padi hoti to tu actual mein video ke points par counter arguments deta ki vo kyun galat hai. Naaki illogical statements. Hamne bhi dharma pada hai lekin ham teri tarah confirmation bias mein nahin jeete. Jo galat hai usse galat hi bolte hain.
Kshitij as a debunker 🗿🗿
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled. ☝🏻☝🏻
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Like you bro
@@tgx6288 by a live debat its get proved that who is fooling if you think your father is right then bring him to the channel of sanatan samikasha(kushwaha ji ) he will put your propaganda in your ###
He wants to say that there is nothing in Hindu scriptures.
He is just finding mistakes from modern science from videos and grabbing the audience from his channel.
Even the best universities work on Hindu Scriptures not only in India others also.
Gr8 line
There are some people in India who says Bhaskara and Kerala School discovered Calculus and Newton/ Leibniz Stole it from Indians. Please debunk it.
Yes ! Bhaskara had some concepts of Derivatives but never came up with the concept of Differentiation
, Kerala School build upon it . But if we read atleast Newton's Method of Fluxions we can clearly see he came to it by his own way .
I have seen this phenomenon in Arabs and Indians people who found similarities in any concept for two different reasons but they don't know how civilizations influence others even if they don't know each other.
About this context, people's view is binary therefore improper presentation just leads to conflict. If someone wanted to say this then he has to represent this thing properly, I don't think Kshitij is good for that, still if he does then it's good.
@tdj461 He is the ideal man for debunking these , Today even CK Rajju and his student chavda goes on saying Indian Ganita superior than Western Maths , how is it Is there anything Eastern / Western in Maths ?? Gal groups discovered by Galois , Number Fields discovered by Germans . Etale Cohomology discovered by Grothendieck.
@@TopeshMitterAssociating the knowledge with any region or ethnicity is foolish, they should be debunked but there is a difference between "This discovered in India" and "This stolen from India" and there many interpretations of the same thing. As far as I have seen Kshitij, he is not a guy who can communicate to the other side clearly. No matter how true someone is, but if he doesn't know the other side's belief, he couldn't accomplish his views. Still I encourage him to do it.
Btw, what do you think about the Indian Knowledge System? Few people criticise it for any type of pseudo science it could spread but I think it should be criticised for other reasons because the government could filter it and then can introduce it. My reason to criticise it is that it is an implising World or West is a separate entity to India, so we just introduced India's knowledge, that's the reason. If anyone wants to prevent any ancient knowledge then he should reduce it with modern subjects and contribute to academia instead of making own academia. In my college we got a minor subject, I read it's around 300 MCQs and found only one or two pseudo science related content, the other was about history, architecture and literature. My stance is that it should be included in those corresponding subjects instead of making new so-called *Indian* subjects.
Edit: If ancient people were able to communicate with each other, their methodologies would not differ and then there was no such thing like that. Also these types of people should question why they are not storing IKS or Ganita on paper, why are they using East Asian technology based Western Computers for storing that data? 😂
@@tdj461 All of these will be removed if one debunks them.
Good work 👍👍👍
Keep it up
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Heisenberg was influenced by conversations with Rabindranath Tagore, where they discussed the metaphysical ideas in Indian philosophy. The philosophical perspectives of interconnectedness and the nature of reality resonated with the emerging principles of quantum mechanics, which Heisenberg helped pioneer.
He is claiming vedas are wrong by using vedas what a irony 😂😂
Arpit sir mohit guar pata hai
It may be possible that Heisenberg was influenced by philosophical ideas that but he had built up mathematical and physical backing of his theory by own.
@@aniketkoli4282 you literally proved kshitij's point of pseudo science 😂
@@HarshitB-nt1fm if that was illogical then he ignored vedas
"Religion is where you follow everything. Science is where you challenge everything."
~A.S Rana
So did you or he challenged every statement or theory or fact given by scientists or just accepted their sayings? Did you guys do lab tests to verify the concepts or not?
Do you guys understand that religion and science don't share the same domian?
@@kashanrizvi3419knowledge has sources and authority is one among them.
@kashanrizvi3419 Science is challenged everyday. That is why we were able to go to the moon, invent a covid vaccine etc. Religion is just people following the will of claimed god without asking why did god decided to kill 10 newborns in jhansi fire or why god just watched bilkis bano getting raped etc.
@@kashanrizvi3419... No they don't, religion is concerned about morality and immaterial realm which science has very less to comment upon as it's primarily concerned with matter. That said, you clearly do not understand the concept of fact, theory and hypothesis. Facts are the basis, the foundation upon which one stands and measures the truth value of hypothesis which become a theory in case of a tautology and the model is constantly refined, this process does not claim infallibility like religion but always remains open to counter evidence which is convincing and capable of going thru the scientific process of validation and experimentation... Anyways, please tell me I'm not wasting my time on you as your mind is too thick with pseudo science and religion to even open up an inch to something called reason, as I'm clearly feeling by the end of this reply that I have wasted my time
@@anoopsrana then why still believes in big bang thoery ,
Thanks for this video. Nowadays Vishal has gone overboard with the idea that everything science has done is already available in vedas and related texts.
Bhakts are disrespecting Vedanta by comparing it with Quantum physics.... What Vedanta teaches is far advanced than science can ever discover.
Because bhakts don't understand even vedanta
@vikashpandey9230 Yes, They know nothing but proud of everything.
What Vedanta teaches is metaphysics and philosophy. Epistemologically it doesn't have much credibility. These are just few ideas in a cease pool of many different idea. You can choose to believe those ideas or not. Science deals with things we can verify. For example, it is scientific fact that life exists. We can verify it. Now what you make of life is a different question. You can find purpose or meaning of it but those are all metaphysical attributes. For example, you can believe god or some higher power has given you a purpose in life and you may do your best to find that and maybe eventually you'll end up finding that purpose but there is really no way to know if that purpose is truly your purpose or heck if even purpose exists or not. Therefore, you just have to belief in what suits you. Tell me one example of such thing that Vedanta teaches you which is more advanced that science and tell in what sense it is more advanced. this is a genuine question
@upamanyu.baishya , Read vedanta, For example Read Drg Drsya Viveka, Aparokshanubhuti, Aatma Bodha, Mandukya Upanishad etc books to know what vedanta is saying.
Vedanta talks about "Brahman", the ultimate reality which is Ground of all being. Science has its limitations and hence it can never uncover Brahman. That's how Vedanta is far more advanced than Science.
Purpose of life cannot be taken lightly as you put it bcz morals are based on what we think purpose of life is. Vedanta alsp gives us morals which Science can never hope to discover. So Vedanta is superior to Science in the matter of Ethics too..
@@upamanyu.baishya how much you have read vedanta ?
YEH MIRROR 🎉🎉🎉KA EXAMPLE AAPNE BAHUT ACHA DIYA.. LAGE RAHEA AAP BAHUT AAGE JAYENGE GE ❤
True. One of the best
Sandeep maheshwari is doing the same on his spiritual channel, why is no one talking about that ??? 🤔🤔🤔
If u don't believe that then u can go watch his advanced spirituality part 6 . He was trying to explain the sound of silence mathematically 😢
( I am not saying that he is completely wrong because that's not my expertise but some one should question him , he has a great influence)
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Yeah! We need a commentary of that!
Sandeep is a evil person
Yes you are right, he is definitely a bigger threat than vishal chaurasiya.
We need to make this comment much engaged so that it comes on top and Kshitiz happens to see it!
Your content day by day 📈📈
content of propaganda
Hello Sir I Harshad from Nagpur pursuing my BS in Physics. I frequently watch your videos for my academics as well as for scientific temperament.And I am looking forward for my Ms in nanotechnology.So there is miniscule suggestion from your student, while giving any statement of any scientist there is necessity to come with written form in there book or an audio clip for that statement. I know it's not possible every time but as a student we must know the resources. And thank you for explanation.
Which College man ?
@yuganshkanoje9631 Dr. Ambedkar College Nagpur ( Dikshabhoomi)
@harshadmeshram6373 me from Shivaji Science
what a beautiful explanation 😍, kitna complicated kar rakhe the sabne but now it's really easy to understand the double slit experiment, thank you so much for this valuable information
knowing or making content about culture and religion is not bad, but they manipulate scientific theories according to their own need and misinform people , thanks for explaining in detail
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
WhatsApp university principal Sudhanshu bjp wala no harm here
Even the samajwadi party and tmc has radical madarsa graduates they are giving gyaan on Allah's world of gravity 😂😂😂
*English destroyed
@@kakashi_vladivostokit seems someone got triggered
10:42 "koi rocket science nhi hai"
Quantum mechanics smjha ke, rocket science compare kr diya😂😂
"Photons are everywhere, like in the form of visible light. So why don’t these photons interact with electrons and collapse their wave nature all the time? How does the wave behavior of electrons remain unaffected in everyday conditions?"
I'm naive please don't judge if i have asked basic.
That’s actually a very good question, that’s why we conduct these experiments in noiseless environments. We always try to avoid quantum de coherence
@@astrokshitij what kind of environment they make .... Dark?? Full dark?? With no single photon?
@@RajeshChhabra-yt5hv yes we want answers astrokshitij plss explain us
Great explanation..... specifically with the meaning of observation in the experiment.
Already explained by vigyan recharge channel but I couldn't understand wave function kaha gaya
आम जनमानस की समस्या यह है कि उनको न Spirituality का ज्यादा पता होता है और न Science का। विशाल जैसे लोग भारी या confusing शब्दों का प्रयोग कर लोगों को उलझा देते हैं। लोगों को न Non duality के Concept की समझ होती है और न ही Quantum Physics का और न ही लोगो को इन चीजों की गहराई में जाकर तथ्यों की जाँच पडताल करनी होती है। लोग तो आजकल अपने धर्म, देश जाति प्रदेश भाषा संस्कृति पर गर्व करने के लिए तैयार होके बैठे रहते हैं।
Vishal jo bhee apne video mein bataate hain vo satik hain..tum log ab thoda science padh liye ho aur mann mein khujli aagayi hain ki khud kaa science tera Vishal jee se sahi hain .. bewkuf hain tu...kyunki Vishal jitna science aur grantho mein samanta bataate hain vo bilkul sahi hota hain..aur unki science jo ki quantum physics kaa bataate hain vo best hain..kyunki maine sirf quantum physics par hee study kiya hain
@surendrayadav3156 bhai paka tune physics v nahi padha hai. Agar padha hota to Science or psudoscience me difference pata hota.
@@ranjeetrawat9831 bhai tu pseudoscience par toh bilkul bahas mat kar...chal aaja challenge karte hain ek dusare ko..tu proof de ki Vishal jee pseudoscience hee bolte rahte hain ...but Vishal jee ke video par mat jaana kyunki unhone tum jaiso kaa confusion door karne ke liye hee pseudoscience bola tha..pseudoscience kaa reality tu mujhe mat samjha...matlab grantho se science nahin nikala.. evidence de tu...main un scientist kaa book tujhe dikhaaunga jisme unhone mention Kiya hua hain ki kaun see science grantho se liya gaya hain..aaza challenge karte hain ek dusare ko.. evidence dene ke liye taiyaar ho jaa..page number bol aur book kaa name bata kar .
@@ranjeetrawat9831mereko non duality ke baare mein nahin pata..bhai tu non duality ke hee baare mein bata de . explain me..aur jitna youtube hain search karne non duality par dekh le aur phir mujhe explain kar bhai..phir bhee tera gyaan galat ho jaayega
..ab tu soch gahan adhyayan karna padta hain gyaan paane ke liye..tu soch raha hain ki youtube par log non duality ko ek dum sahi se defined karte jin toh tu thoda galat sochta hain...check kar le
Very Good,, keep uploading video like this,
Bhai aap keh rahe hain " dekho saare bade scientist keh rahe hain ki consciosness ka lena dena nahi hai QM se to nahi hoga " . Ye kaisi argument hai. Aap bol sakte hain ki koi consensus nahi hai . Nobody knows hence hyperquest ko aise claims nahi karne chahiye
When there's only single slit, and we trigger electrons without any pre-slit observations, we still get a single line on the screen. That means it's gone through the slit as a particle, not a wave. Why is this happening without any observation, any wave collapse ?
The band pattern is a result of interference of two waves. For a single slit, there will be neither an interference nor a single band, but a diffraction pattern.
@@pranav210591you are right
quantam particles always act like a wave and in superposition only if we isolate them in experiments, quantam particles are not literally wave they just act like a wave mathematically and physically, and they always are in superposition, but when they have more than 1 probability (more than 1 slit) then they interfere with itself like a wave, that's why we see wave pattern on detector screen
Sanatani Nahi maanenge😂
Agar photon collide krta electron se to vo particle hota ... Jab hum koi light ni marte electron pr tab kya veh dark me tha .... ?? Means light to harjagah ha to electron tab kuy ni krta interact ...jab specially light ki jati tab hi kuy particle hojata?
Young's Double Slit Experiment ko bina light ke hi perform kiya jaata hai. Sirf screen par detectors hote hain jo interference pattern ko detect kar sakein. Koi additional disturbance nahin hota hai.
Agar slits par detectors laga do to wave function collapse ho jaata hai, jis wajah se screen par interference pattern nahin milta.
@rohittekchandani5720 jab hum observer rakhte sirf tab hi photon interact krta usse or camera tak jata ? ...jab koi camera ni rkhaa to photon kaha par tha kya kr rha tha?
Awesome. The mirror example is geat.
8:50 : कृष्ण कहते है की सब प्रकृति के गुणों से होता है । और हम जो चेतना है उसे हम अहंकार भी बोल सकते है उसे लगता है की मैं ने किया , मैं कररहा हू और Quantum mechanics का विषय लो तो मेने देखा इसलिए पार्टिकल का गुण चेंज हुवा 🤣🤣 ऐसे है हम अहंकारी ( चेतना ) । ये अहंकार के चलते हमारे मुर्ख धार्मिक लोग विज्ञान का अपमान करते है ।
Wave travel karti hai to wave ki tarah ? Ye kaisi samajh hai. Jab tak observation nahi hua , tab tak particle exists only as a probability function , which can be said to be wave like. Particle existz in superpsition , meaning with probability less than one in all possible positions
Copenhagen interpretation says that nothing can be said about what really happened on observation because the wave function is purely mathematical. Copenhagen interpretation is purely epistemological. It means there may or may not be a quantum world, QM just describes interactions in probabilistic / mathematical terms
quantam particles always act like a wave and in superposition only if we isolate them in experiments, quantam particles are not literally wave they just act like a wave mathematically and physically, and they always are in superposition, but when they have more than 1 probability (more than 1 slit) then they interfere with itself like a wave, that's why we see wave pattern on detector screen
Brother only consciousness exist in the universe or multiverse.you guys have limited knowledge to understand consciousness likewise classical and quantum scientists.so you are right to some extent to understand the level of theoretical physics where scientists unable to answer about consciousness or energy on how and by whom this universe operates.
Bhai. Aajtak koi consensus nahi hai about what QM means. Aapko saare interpretation batane chahiye. David Bohm 's pilot wave, Hugh Everett's many worlds, Chris Fuchs Qubism, Copenhagrlen. There is no correct interpretations
But without a subject there is no World as an object when the illusion of ego " i " dissolves there is only pure existence with no subject or object I think he was trying to say that when the illusion of a subject is created the world as an object is created without the illusion both are one when Advita say world is created by the observer it means world as an object exist only because of the subject without the subject its just pure existence ( Bhraman)
Oh man thanks, finally someone talked about this. The first time I heard about observer effect was from a reel where Neil deGrass Tyson was talking about it, and in that clip he said "How does the electron know that we are watching it" and the video ends. I wanted to know more about it and ChatGpt suggested Feynman lectures.
I understood nothing but I kept at it and reread the chapters and then when things clicked. My first thought was that N.dg. tyson should have never said that...
Bro why are you using wrong graphics for observed particles after double slit.
That really causes major confusion among my classmates during the quantum mechanics course.
Confusion was so much that a simple interpretation of low intensity photos and electron detection experiments was unacceptable to them.
Please show them the gaussian distribution instead of two lines.
"Every identical experiment doesn't give identical solution" And "if person understand quantum physics, either he is lying or he's stupid"
Also there is no correct interpretation of QM. Koi consensus nahi hai. Qubism is also an interpretation which brings in consciousness. Hugh Everett ki many worlds interpretation bhi hai which says quantum collapse is happening in multiple universes.
Hi. I'd just like to pose a somewhat related argumet here! My proposition is that when the entire act of measurement either by device or by naked eye (although, i dont even know if experimental outcomes in modern physics can be perceived by naked eye 😅) is the reason of probability wavefn getting collapsed then isn't it, in a macro perspective, seems plausable that existance of observer is the reason of observable reality is becoming 'real', in the literal sense of the word??
Altough it delves into a bit philosophy and metaphysics but still there is a cultural enigma going on within the human intellectual spheres that demonstrates this fude between concepts like existance, non-existance and an "indifferent universe"(well i dont even know if the universe can feel or not feel indifference at all 🤣)
Yeah, not a question though, just some thought popped up randomly! Cheers ✌🏽
PBS vali video samajh nahi aayi, please make such explanation videos in Hindi.
Use gemini to translate and interprete
Thank you sir bhout hi badiya video tha ek jabrdast jaankari mili hai sir ji,,,
wonderful explanation, sir🔥
Aaj ki modern Quantum physics hamari Qur'an pak se li gayee hai!
Bro's explanation 🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
Logic of sanatanis 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Sanatanis ❌
Tunnis ✅
@arjit-mi7rw ☠️💀 sanatuni
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
They are not to be called sanatani
Black sheep of sanatan dharma
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Conciousness has some role with quantum mechanics i read a research paper of on biology and quantum mechanics that has a possibility in making conciousness through superposition but its not proven
Bro love your videos
I highly recommend you to make a review video on sandeep maheshwari advance spiritual 6th episode plsss
He talked about conciousness and quantum mechanic
Science ke bacche zara batao 1952 me kaise yoganand pram hans ne apni body chhod di, aur wo body 20 din gak decompose nahi hui,
Thoda gyaan ko samjho tab vigyaan acche se samjh aae ga.
Know who you are first, आत्माबोध 🙏🏻
"Religion has always been the hallmark of stupidity and foolishness. No other organisation keeps their people so paranoid as religion does."
~A.S Rana
Nice try just look at the science lovers, they read bunch of papers released in some magazines like nature and believe in those. It's akin to what you believe that religion have books and texts and preachers which propagate stupidity and foolishness. Just in the case of followers of science, books are replaced by papers released in those magazines and preachers are replaced by scientists. These followers never verify the papers by conducting experiments or challenging the positions proposed. Oh sorry that's dogma. Multiverse can exist in view of many science followers. Pardon me did I just expose the dogma of science followers. Huh, science followers getting paranoid.
@@kashanrizvi3419bro after writing this bs paragraph 😎
Mere opinion ko suite kare aise quotes likh deta hu cool lagaunga
Meanwhile science: my body is 99 percent empty
@@Jaat-jz8vg why do you 60 iq people have to care about science's verdicts ? If i put you in a hydraulic press would your body get denser or not ?
Heisenberg was influenced by conversations with Rabindranath Tagore, where they discussed the metaphysical ideas in Indian philosophy. The philosophical perspectives of interconnectedness and the nature of reality resonated with the emerging principles of quantum mechanics, which Heisenberg helped pioneer.
You're claiming vedas are wrong by using vedas what a irony 😂😂
Nope , heisenburg pioneered the uncertainty principle in 1927 , and visited Mr Tagore in 1929 , so ur claim that heisenburg got influenced by metaphysical ideas given by Mr Tagore seems inaccurate to me
@@bodiminds6571 Indian philosophy, including ideas rooted in the Vedas, may not have directly influenced Heisenberg's scientific principles, his interaction with Tagore helped him connect the metaphysical aspects of Indian philosophy with his understanding of quantum theory. This meeting reinforced Heisenberg’s view that certain principles in Indian thought aligned with the emerging worldview of quantum physics.
@@bodiminds6571 Indian philosophy, including ideas rooted in the Vedas, may not have directly influenced Heisenberg's scientific principles, his interaction with Tagore helped him connect the metaphysical aspects of Indian philosophy with his understanding of quantum theory. This meeting reinforced Heisenberg’s view that certain principles in Indian thought aligned with the emerging worldview of quantum physics.
Well said❤
Please make a video on why people believe in pseudoscience.😊
can he live deabte
Also, Einstein jaise scientist ko quote karke bolna ki inhone kaha hai dekho, to sach hoga is frankly very stupid. Einstein ne zabardasti cosmological constant bhi ghusaya tha apne equations mein because he 'believed' in a self-contained, static universe. Debunk Hyperquest's claim on logical grounds. Do not appeal to authority. Otherwise you are same as him. He says " Vedas say.... " , while you say " Einstein said.....".
Wasn’t the experimental setup explanation and discussion of quantum de coherence was used to do that?
@@astrokshitijNo. Please educate yourself before educating others.
@@astrokshitij bata can you debate sanantan samiksha , if not on his platform , then a nutral channel , or any ex Muslim channel , I know you will not accept the challenge because you are fake
@@shradhasingh7789 tu khud rational world channel pe aa live waha tu aur tera baap dono fake prove ho jayega
क्वांटम मैकेनिक्स का तो भाई ज्यादा मै कह नहीं सकता की कितना सच कितना झूठ है पर एक चीन शायद तेरी समझ में कभी भी नहीं आए पर कोशिश करना समझने की । वो बात ये है कि जिस कांशसनेस यानी चेतना की तू बात कर रहा है कि चेतना का क्वांटम मैकेनिक्स से कुछ लेना देना नहीं है और ऑब्जर्वेशन की तू बात कर रहा है तो भाई वास्तव में हर चीज सिर्फ इसकी बात नहीं को ऑब्जर्व करने वाली चेतना ही है । बिना चेतना के कुछ भी ऑब्जर्व किया ही नहीं जा सकता फिर वो वेव है या पार्टिकल क्या ही फर्क पड़ेगा । और जिस के बदबूते पर तू खुद का अस्तित्व मानता है वो शरीर नहीं है वो भी चेतना ही है ।
Thank Y🫡U...✍️🏾
Penrose also supports the idea that consciousness is linked to quantum physics( along with hameroff- although with few supporters in the academia) and prominent rationalist youtubers like sabine hossenfelder although expressing scepticism and reservations have opened upto the possibility that their may be truth to this idea. In lieu of Patricia Churchland's and dennetian propositions you have simplify accepted the argument that these ideas constitute pseudscience upfront. I mostly like you bashing religious interpretations and regressive intrusions infecting the public scientific discourse. I would argue you need to engage more with philosophers of science, postmodernist interpretations of science, a little bit of epistemic humility and digging deep into what experts themselves see gives a picture that *most* stuff in quantum physics, science of consciousness is *contested* right to the level of the very foundations .Also, popper's falsifiability criterion although important doesn't permeate everything and is actually questioned by most philosophers of science like sean caroll and Massimo pigilluci with many of them favouring quine's bundle of hypothesis, some following kuhnian ideas among others.
Nice comment brother. But it seems to me that youtuber will not get it 🥲
Bohot bariya 👏👏👏
Be rational⚛️❤
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Schrodinger
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Bakri
?@@Aashif316
ऊर्जा की अवस्था के कारण संवेदनाओं और चेतना में कुछ तो संबंध है ?
bro sudhanshu trivedi ke tunni vigyaan par bhi video banao pls
❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY
Tu Vishal k hyper quest k video pr video bna kr apna career banane ki soch rha he pr vo hoga nhi bhai kyuk orginal orginal hota he ....aur Vishal k video sirf apne video banane ke liye mt dekha kr suna b kr shi se
Squaring a circle-(Yajur vedam, Katyanana sulba, 3.14) , Pythagoras theorem - (ch 1.12 , Baudhayana Sutras, Kalpa , Yajur vedam) , GRAVITY - (4th shlokam,13th chapter ,Pancha Sidhantika) , Orbital velocity calculation - (5th slokam,2nd chapter,Surya Siddhantam), BINARY NUMBER SYSTEM (21st,22nd,23rd sutras,8th Chapter, Chhandas Shastra),Ascending Power of 10 -(Shukla Yajurvedam,17.2) , Sine wave ( 12th slokam,Gitika pada,Aryabhattia), Circling a square - (Yajur vedam,Katayana Sulba ,3.13)
@@skumar8817 🤣😂🤣
Dekh liya kahi nhi diya hai
I saw but didn't find
Abe chat gpt ke bhonde
tum reservation wale hote hi bandhmuddi ho
Jai Bhim Bhai
Can this proves that islam has a critical error ?
In islam Allah is a all-knowing entity, as you know that in quran and hadith there are many lines written which can be used in a positive way as well as negative way. And as you know many people used these lines to kill millions. Allah already knew that if he wrote these lines then it leads to misconception and leads to mass killing, then why does he choosed to write in that manner even if he knew the brutal consequences. It actually shows that it actually not written by any higher entity like god , and the remaining writers left are no other than humans.🥳
You don't need this to prove islam has critical error. 😂😂😂😂
Ask them for a scriptural evidence of Quran from 7th century. There is none.
And btw, this all-knowing entity is not only in Islam but Christianity, Judaism and some hindu philosophies as well
@@yourguyin2554 yeah but in islam , the verses are too much misleading, even now
Take the pain to quote some verses with examples and effects of misinterpretation leading to loss of life of millions.
And as footnote take it. If you think Islam nd rulings are only from Quran then you are naive like 3rd garder trying to teach graduates in science. There is Quran and Hadith and seerah as well. If you say that but Quran has this or that then science also has books at different levels which doens't give clear and full understand of concepts which may lead wrong understanding.
@@yourguyin2554 A simple youtube search shows we do have proof. The manuscript has been carbon dated to 6th-7th century by University of Birmingham and is held by the same.
16:51 Andromeda + Milkyway = Milkomeda galaxy 😂😂😂
akhand milkyway galaxy 🤣🤣
@@ex_SoulLover Ek din vo bhi hindu rashtra hoga🗿🗿🗿
“Access to the Vedas is the greatest privilege this century may claim over all previous centuries” is a quote by J. Robert Oppenheimer, the physicist who developed the atomic bomb. - J. Robert Oppenheimer , Now who is right J. Robert Oppenheimer or Kshitij ?
bro this quote is actually said by vivekanand
Tunniyon ko sirf gapodna aata hai bas
WhatsApp university graduate spooted
IDK whats the problem this man is littlary sickk baat baat pe scriptures ko target karta hai , and logon ko target karta hai , haan bhaii tuu sick ha tuu unnlogon ko refrence banaa rhaa hai jo log thode se weak hain scriptures me , but still try their ki kuch aur deep jaaye par tuu bhai tittle saise deta hai jaise ttuujhey thekaa milaa hai science bacchaane ko .
Curious 💫💫😀
अरे तूने तो quantum wave function collapse की सही प्रमाणित interpretation दें दी है जाकर सीधे nobel prize ले, यहां UA-cam पर बैठकर क्यों फर्जी ज्ञान पेल रहा है और लोगों को मूर्ख बना रहा है
Tere tanatan granthon me sab likha hai toh tunniyon ne aaj tak koi khoj q nhi kiya.
Tujhe ye video samjh bhi aaya??
Aisa lagta hai Tune poora video dekhe bina hi comment kar diya.
@@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc तू भी कोई नोबेल पुरस्कार विजेता वैज्ञानिक है क्या
@@pankajdwivedi6620 tujhe video samjh aayi ki nhi nhi, nasamjh tunni
@@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc आजकल You tube पर बहुत से नोबेल पुरस्कार विजेता वैज्ञानिक बैठकर ज्ञान पेल रहे हैं, और तूने कौन सा अविष्कार किया है यह भी बता दे
🤡 religion books are book of science Maine bhi logical fallacy padhi hai try harder
Bhayia you can correct me but i think hyper quest is not proving that quantum physics is in sankhaya darshan but showing that conciousness and quantum level mechanisms are similar both changes there property when they are observed and much more conclusion. Yeah may be my interpretation is wrong but using Science to understand some philosophical concept or philosophy to understand science is this good way i think it is beacuse people like Niel bohr also gone through Upanishads to discover new topic that can be aligned with science yeah subject is not same like conciousness and electron in quantum mechanics but there conclusion is what matter.
And bhayia why you not try some philosophy like sankhya darshan i think it will give a broader view point.
So to sum up that obviously sankhya darshan don't have formulize quantum mechanics but it explains the relation between consciousness and reality just like quantum mechanics EXPLAINS the electron and observer so the point of Hyper quest may be was he is just presenting that similar mindsets were involved in both things and he also confirmed in the video where he replied to expose and roast that he is not claiming science but trying to co relate the conclusions of science with Philosophy and I think great physict like Neil bohr and Erwin Schrodinger also done that with science and Indian philosophy and Upanishads
@@Darshanik-vedYou should be knowing one interesting thing and i .e vedic mantras have 3 meanings.
1 adidaivik: It's the topic between relation of creator and material world (how creator involved in creation, present state and destruction of materials and universe) and discuss about creators formless nature) and subtle entities that can't be seen from eyes
2. Adibhautik: Knowledge of what we see from our eyes, rules and decorum to maintain and follow for civilised and knowledgeable society and sustainability of resources of how to make use of resources
3.. adyatmik: Knowledge and principles of how to connect our soul with supreme soul..
Basically what I'm trying to say here is that ... Think of our universe as a well designed software, programmed by a creator.. the language which creator initially used is (Aum rashmi) very subtle vibration (think of it as binary language as of computer) it's a program to basically disturb muul prakriti initial state of matter to bring it to laws and principles..
Further these vibrating enties loose their subtle nature and come upto atoms electrons and molecules a higher level language (in software World)
Basically binary and higher level language represent the same thing..and this is the most interesting thing vedas claim and also produced... A theory basically devloped by agnivrat nasitik using brahmanical text
@@gautam_505 Interesting but not the most because 6 Darshan like Sankhya Yog Vasesik Vedant Mimansa Nyaya dept in to the concept of ultimate consciousness and many other concepts too deep like an phd philosophy read sankhya darshan once by reading sankhya karika by ishwar Krsna with vachaspati commentary
@@gautam_505 And about Creator. I want to correct you God bhagwan or Brahmn what you like to call doens't create matter but the universe. Matter was always there which is beginningless(an assumption by darshan and science too for the sake of further exploration) and the Ishwar or Brahmn or Bhagwan manifested the matter into Universe so God is the ultimate consciousness who thinks of manifesting matter into Universe like a potter conciousness thinks to create Pot from the available Clay.
@@gautam_505 And about Creator. I want to correct you God bhagwan or Brahmn what you like to call doesn't create matter but the universe. Matter was always there which is beginning less(an assumption by darshan and science too for the sake of further exploration) and the Ishwar or Brahmn or Bhagwan manifested the matter into Universe so God is the ultimate consciousness who thinks of manifesting matter into Universe like a potter conciousness thinks to create Pot from the available Clay
🔥❤️
😊
Don't hit directly to grow channel..hit indirectly.
Deepak chopra and HyperQuest are those chai ki dukan wale bahiya jinko jamane bhar ka gyaan pe se hi prapt ho gaya tha.
Chup raho astro kshitaj and don't try to become oversmart
Kyaa oversmart hai iss video Mai, fool 😂 . Jaali na😂..
Thanks a lot to understand a easy way to confirm the correct
shri krishn : consciousness jesa kuch nhi hota sab natural hai
Explain it further or else read again what you wrote and tell us does it make sense?
@kashanrizvi3419 हा, हमारे सब निर्णय और क्रिया के पीछे कोई चेतना नहीं है हम तो सब कर्म प्रकृति के गुण से , संयोग से और शरीर के रसायन से चलता है । हमारे विचार दूसरो पे निर्भर करते है , हमारे सब गुण दूसरो से और प्रकृति से संचालित होते है , और हमे ऐसा लगता है सब हम कर रहे है । पर कृष्ण बोलते है ये सब कुछ नहीं है । चेतना जैसा कुछ नहीं है
@@semicolon6499han ab jo cheez insane ki aqal se bhahar ha consciousness jiska science bhi pata ni laga payi to ap logo ne uska inkar kardiya gravity ka bhi ni pata how its work ye dekhti kese iska inkar q ni karte conciouseness ek realty ha lekin ye ek Mistry ha how it's work
@@semicolon6499कृष्ण ने कहा कहा की चेतना जैसा कुछ नही होता, उन्होने ये कहा कि अहम कुछ नही होता, यह "I" tendency hoti है, जो अपने आप को कुछ मान बैठती है है या तादात्म्य बना लेती है जिसे फिर conciousnes bol diya जाता, तो esi conciousness तो illusion hai, par अन्ततः to keval pure consciousness hi hoti jo impersonal hoti है,yahi ultimate hai everything whatever appears in the world is superimposed on pure consciousness, which also called aatma or brhman
@rabisiddiqui6127 आप थोड़ा आंख खोले देखेंगे की तुम जो कर रहे हो वो कहा से आरहा है तो पता चलेगा कि उस केलिए कोई चेतन चीज की जरूरत नहीं है , हम एक मशीन जेसे है , एक सुंदर लड़की दिखी तो अंडर से रसायन का खेल चालू होगया , और एक भद्दी लड़की देखो तो मूड खराब होगया तो बताओ ये कोई चेतना होके का प्रमाण है क्या ? ये तो शरीर गुण और सामाजिक कंडीशंन है । तुम्हरे विचार भी चेतन नहीं है , तुम्हारा दर भी चेतन नही है , सब बाहर से प्रभावित है । ये जो में बोल रहा हु उसे प्रयोग में लाना दिमाग फट जायेगा और समझ में आएगा की चेतना ( consciousness ) जैसा कोई है ही नहीं सब Ai जेसे प्रोग्राम है प्रकृति के द्वारा ।
@astrokshitij
Vedic Physics: Scientific Origin of Hinduism
…
Raja Ram Mohan Roy, 1999
Kindly debunk this book.
Raja Ram Mohan Roy toh 1840 me mar gya?
@darkjoker361 wahi to doubt h bhai pr ye book to real h...ab uske ideas se bani ki kisi aur ne likhi wo maine pdha nhi hai.
@@Skeptic_arun yeah fake hi hoga raja ram mohan roy focused on philosophy and social norms in his life instead of logic
@@darkjoker361 haan koi Arya samaji hoga. Recently someone mentioned this book during a discussion/debate/argument, with so much pride.
Depends on what stuff he refers to as "Scientific" in Vedic literature. Any such book can be written about any civilization or group of literature in the world.
Dam hai to sudhanshu Trivedi per video banao .
Google ka baap🗿🤣🤣❤️
Bro vo to bolta hai ki hindu dharm me pehle se nav grah diye hai par use ye nahi pata ki unhi nav grah me sun,moon bhi hai jo ki science ne planet nahi Mane hai aur rahu, ketu bhi hai jiska ko evidence nahi hai .
Spreading pseudoscience only😂😂
Ohm =mc^2
Pseudoscience bhi usi ne spread Kiya
Agar ye sahi hai to proof kha hai
@@Strider5289 11 mulko ke veggayanik darthe hai he usse😅🤡🤡🤡
@@NirmayprasadYadavWaah waah 😂😅
@@arjit-mi7rw kiddo grah is not equal to planet
Graha means "to seize" or "to influence" in Sanskrit. It refers to celestial bodies or forces that exert an influence on human life and events on Earth.
A planet is a celestial body that orbits a star, is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, and has cleared its orbital path of debris.
Ek baar google kar lete mandbudhi😑
Bhai Tera dimag av itna developed ni h jo darshano ko smjh sake 😂😂😂
Tu rehne de... Adhri gagri h tu jo sirf chalakta hai
Bhai Tera dimag abhi itna developed nahi hai jo Science ko samajh sake. Tu rehne de.
"Naach na jaane aangan teda".
@rohittekchandani5720 science v padhi h aur dharm v
Tu sirf science padha h to chup hi reh
@@kidsvideos4funYahi to dikkat hai bhai teri. Tu andhere mein jee raha hai ki tune science padi hai, aur jab tujhe actually mein science padayi jaa rahi hai (jaise is video mein) tu tune bina koyi reason diye use nakar diya. Agar tune science padi hoti to tu actual mein video ke points par counter arguments deta ki vo kyun galat hai. Naaki illogical statements.
Hamne bhi dharma pada hai lekin ham teri tarah confirmation bias mein nahin jeete. Jo galat hai usse galat hi bolte hain.
@@kidsvideos4funRamayan balkand sarg 36 shlok 5-7
Me jo Divya vigyan laga hai vo samjha do. Mai bhi to janu shiv ka Divya vigyan 100 sal tak ka
@@kidsvideos4fun😂😂 lagta Hain kisi ki jal Rahi hain
Thank you for your efforts 🙏🏻
@hyperquest
@HyperQuest @HyperQuest
#HyperQuest #Hyperquest