Best Video XLR Shotgun Microphone?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 чер 2024
- Review and comparison of 12 shotgun microphones where I buy the winner! See which of these XLR microphones is the best for video and which you should avoid. Want to support the channel? Check out my video guides here: academy.dslrvideoshooter.com
=============================
THE MICROPHONES
=============================
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Links marked as “PAID LINK” are affiliated.
🛒 Sennheiser 416 (Winner) on B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/361D8cH
🛒 Sennheiser MKE 600 on B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/3fxcL1s
🛒 Azden SGM 3500 on B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/33f5I8H
🛒 Azden SGM 3500L on B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/2JcQJor
🛒 Rode NT5 on B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/3m4zkwL
🛒 Oktava MK-012 on Amazon (PAID LINK): geni.us/r1MCHzs
🛒 Rode NTG3 on B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/2V0zpWq
🛒 Rode NTG5 on B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/39dNQyY
🛒 Rode NTG4+
Amazon (PAID LINK): geni.us/IM34y
B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/3nULnNW
🛒 Deity S-Mic 2
Amazon (PAID LINK): geni.us/P0W2
B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/3fCkJq3
🛒 Deity S-Mic 2S
Amazon (PAID LINK): geni.us/bpgj1N
B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/3fHBY9H
🛒 Rode NTG8 on B&H (PAID LINK): bhpho.to/33e1E8M
=============================
VIDEO CHAPTERS
=============================
0:00 Introduction
0:31 Test Qualifications
1:58 The Microphones
5:06 Sensitivity Test
6:52 Rejection Test
8:03 Sound Quality Test
12:29 All Scores Tallied
13:48 Buying Recommendations
=============================
FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS
=============================
Sennheiser 416 is the best overall.
Sennheiser MKE 600 is the best overall budget option if you don't need a super sensitive microphone.
Azden SGM microphones are my favorite $500 options.
The Rode NTG5 is great if you need a very sensitive microphone
Rode NT and Oktava microphones are amazing and affordable if you don't care as much about sensitivity.
Deity microphones offer build quality as good as a $1000 microphone with a price tag of under $400 and are very sensitive with decent rejection.
The Rode NTG3 is great if you have some cash and want nice low frequency (bass) warmth.
The Rode NTG4+ and NTG8 are a hard pass for me.
=============================
DISCLAIMERS
=============================
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
This video was not paid for by outside persons or manufacturers.
B&H let us barrow a few microphones but they were returned after the production of this video.
The content of this video and my opinions were not reviewed or paid for by any outside persons. - Фільми й анімація
thumbnail is so good dude
Thank you!!!
Yeah I love it
Indeed! If there was an UA-cam Award for best thumbnail, this would definitely be at least at the top 5 2020! Not that I remember a better one, just being humble and assuming there are lots of thumbnails out there.
I did a test like this with a half dozen shotgun mics in about 1996.
I saved my pennies, swallowed hard and bought the then $1,200 Sennheiser MKH 416-P48, rather than the much cheaper options most of my colleagues were using.
About a year later I bought a second one. That pair has circled the planet with me for a couple decades now.
They’ve been the best audio investment I ever made, which includes multiple studios, and they’ve paid themselves off 100 times over.
Funny thing is, every year or so a new mic comes out that claims to be a 416 killer and I first blow it off, then keep hearing about it, then have to know for myself. So I get one, and sometimes they sound good and I give it a try. For a while. But I always come right back to my 416s.
Literally yesterday I was doing an interview with a doctor in a hospital conference room, with AC humming that couldn’t be turned off. Before he got there, I had rolled of the room at about 120hz, but when he sat in and I heard him speak, I changed my plan. He had a deep rich broadcaster voice, that was authoritative and fit the purpose of the interview perfectly, and I didn’t want to roll off his voice.
If you know the 416, you know that yeah you can obviously aim it at the subject, But almost equally important is that can you aim the rear of it at the noise source, and change that ratio dramatically. (Acoustic Source to Noise as opposed to Signal to Noise Ratio). So the combination of using the rear of the mic to reject as much of the room as possible, and having him speak while adjusting my HPF, I was able to find a sweet spot for intelligibility and authority all the way down at 50hz, and his rich voice joined the 10,000 other interviews captured by that trusty old microphone.
Tip: In all audio, second (if not first) to Microphone Choice is Microphone Placement. (Any mic on this list, if well placed, beats the 416 if poorly placed.)
For a talking head interview, thread your boom through whatever mess the camera operator has created.
Now pretend you’re in a recording studio and only recording audio. Start by aiming your 416, at mouth level directly between the interviewer and interviewee, smack dab in their eyeline, parallel to the floor at mouth level. Got it? Skull-416-Skull.
Okay so in your imaginary studio, bring the 416 to about 8-inches away from the subjects mouth (and imagine a pop filter in between while you’re at it). With your headphones on, and talent speaking, if you bring the mic any closer you start to get proximity effect and their voice gets bassier.
(This is precisely the setup you will find in many Voiceover studios around the world, and the 416 is a top choice for spoken word often beating out LDCs costing 2-10 times as much.)
Now back on set, imagine you have a second person raising your stand slowly, you are slowly angling the 416 (white tipped, no windscreen of course), and the higher the stand goes, you keep the mic aimed at the subjects lips in proportion by slowly twisting a section of your boom. When the white tip just barely clears the top of the cameras frame, stop. You’ll be at about a 45-degree downward angle, and most of the time you’re set.
But let’s go further. If there is a side of the room or area that sounds worse than the other, assuming that your boom is parallel to the floor (I use a Mafer Clamp rather than the half dozen specialty boom holders I own), then you can telescope your boom either in or out from this center position, and ‘tilt’ the head of your boom keeping it aimed directly at that mouth, And out of frame, AND getting maximum rejection of whatever noise you’re trying to kill.
Wanna go further? Imagine being at the beach for an intimate soft spoken scene, right at the water, on a pebbly beach with the waves crashing against some rocks, at golden hour. Looks beautiful. Sound is a nightmare. Oh, and it’s windy, so you have your zeppelin on the mic.
About the best you can do is shoot the Wides like before, but when you move in for coverage, boom from the SIDE of the frame, with the back end of the 416 aimed directly at the noisiest part of the beach, and the front end so close to the talent that one or two hairs on your windjammer breaks the frame.
Another common scenario is working on city streets with road traffic.
I can’t tell you how many impossible scenes my 416s have saved from an ADR destiny.
Get a 416.
It’ll be with you longer than most of the people in your life.
Till death do us part.
what a cool comment! Was interesting to read. I’m choosing an xlr mic myself for yt videos…
I dont know anything about audio. However, I really enjoyed reading this comment, even though it was like reading a foreign language
Man your comment is amazing!!
That is awesome! Sennheiser makes great microphones
I feel this way about the CMIT 5u, saving my Pennies for one as we speak
I've got to tip my hat to your thumbnail game. That's one of the best thumbnails I've seen ... I gotta step up my game.
Thanks man!
I’m not going to lie, I came here to say the same thing. Perfection.
It caught my eye 👍🏻
I don’t comment a lot, but I had the same thought the second I saw the thumbnail
whoa you’re that smart home guy right? you made go into a rabbit hole regarding solar panels though
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May
Rough winds do, in fact, shake the darling buds of May
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May
@@stevengonz Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May
Yes, rough winds do shake the darling buds of May
shoot I heard butts 12 x lol
Literally came just to comment about how great of a thumbnail that is, bravo 🔥
Oh, man, I love these kinds of videos. I was really surprised about some of these. I also personally love the MKH416. I have two of them, one for my UA-cam videos and one for my live streams. It sounds perfect on my voice, and that's the variable that no test can figure out for someone else on UA-cam. I always tell people to borrow or rent a mic before buying one because not all mics sound good on every voice (my voice sounds horrendous on the Shure SM7B). Great video, dude!
Yes, a current on-camera microphone round up is needed. I don't think any big channels have done a full roundup since the Deity D3/D3 Pro came out, so far as I can find.
Can we just take a minute to acknowledge Caleb's amazing setup. That background is on point 👌
Seriously?! I need a breakdown on how he achieved this
I just saved this video for that reason! Glad to see some props for it here too
It’s a blender background.
You can take a minute sure, just don't ask me or anyone else to. If people do like it they will likely state it themselves without prompting from someone else
The “natural light” background is so relaxing, people should do this more often.
Also, you always put out such quality content, both visually and informationally. You’re one of the best, Mr Pike. Thanks for doin what ya do.
I had the sales guys at B&H perform for me a test in their mic room and the Sennheiser MKE 600 was the clear winner. It was the size - mountable on my camera, price - under $400 and the fact that it was powered mic - could put a wireless brick on it and plug into DSLRs, were the reasons it won out. Also, it doesn't blow out - I shoot alot of concerts & loud events like my old phantom powered Audio Technica did. The Sennheiser MKE 600 has just been a solid top mic for my cameras through the years. I love it.
Nice job, Caleb! It is interesting how your tests mirrored your own subjective choice and I have to say, they're pretty close to my own impressions as well. That 416 sounds great on your voice!
What is your order for the quality test? I don't think that the NT5 should be in the top Five, I don't agree with this part of the video
@@jesaispasvraimentquoiecrireici These things are somewhat subjective. If you don't like the NT5, that's totally legitimate. The NT5 is pretty good for its price and can be a better option when working indoors in reberberant spaces vs. any shotgun microphone, especially the longer shotguns. Those can create this sort of warbling sound in those situations. The NT5 won't do that in the same space. Also, it seems to have a better reliability record than the Oktava and certainly has a better warranty.
@@curtisjudd what do you think about NTG5 for indoor to make short films?
@@MARTINTALIA I'd generally opt for a non-shotgun if most of my recording will be indoors. But if you manage severe reverberation and aim the microphone correctly and monitor carefully when recording, the NTG5 is fine microphone.
Curtis, I'm surprised you didn't see the problems with this review. The sound quality test is VERY flawed!
1. We don't know what recorder/preamplifier he's using. I know the microphone itself will make more of a difference than the recorder will, but this detail has an effect on sound quality too.
2. The speaker he used, sounds very low quality and is NOT an accurate test subject... No professional would ever judge a mic based on how it sounds pointed at a cheap $30 speaker vs. an ACTUAL person talking. We don't even know which mic was used for the recording that he played back from speaker, which also could have an effect.
A better way to do this would have been to either say the same line 12 times with each mic, or place a few of them next to each other and read lines. Which is actually very easy to do despite what he said in the beginning. Normalize in post afterwards.
3. 9:30 I'm shocked he put the NTG5 so low, since Rode themselves designed it to have a flatter/more natural sound than both the NTG3, and BY FAR better a NTG4+.
4. The Oktava and Rode NT5, shouldn't have been in the review since they're not shotguns. By design, they simply cannot perform at the same level as a shotgun mic, if they were used at a distance outdoors. Which shotguns excel at.
This point is relevant because, it's suppose to be a "Shotgun mic test" not a "Indoor boom mic test".
Other than that, still a neat idea for a video.
I love how thorough your tests are and making sure there's a constant. We're looking to upgrade our fleet and you really answered that question. Your work in this video just got you a like, comment, and subscriber.
Great test! We've been using the MKE600 for years in soooooo many different scenarios. Landed aproximate to where I'd expect in your ranking as its truly an "everything' shotgun. Nice job Caleb.
Welcome to the 416 club! It is fantastic for voiceover too. I love love love mine.
Hey it's my favourite voice over youtuber. Your videos are already helping me a lot with my first project. I'd already gotten a Rode NTG3 before I saw your video though. Budget probably wouldn't have permitted a MKH416 though. Using it with the Scarlett 2i2 3rd gen to add the air to make it less bassy at a more budget price.
@@adrianbaev5277 hey Adrian, what would you suggest between shotgun mics like these vs a dynamic mic? I am about to start a commentary channel
This video was so helpful and well laid out, many thanks and kudos, the chapter separations and the charts at the end of each really made it super effective.
Thank you for this test. I enjoyed watching it. I got MKE600 and am happy with the versatility it provides, to be able to use one AAA battery and use it when needed on camera or use it with external recorder. Great option and I am glad to see it in 4th position at least, which it deserves.
Thank you for this a lot! We need a break from these recent crazy camera releases and refresh our concern on audio department! Great video i really need this!
I really like the exposure of your videos. especially in the last few months. great quality.
Awesome comparison. I personally love my MKH 416! I plan on reviewing it soon. This video gave me some ideas of shotgun mics that I want to test out! So thank you!!
Can we take a minute to talk about the incredible lightning of this set? Remember when he turns out the light it's full black... And yet it looks like there is light going through some windows. Incredible and warm atmosphere here. It is one of your best lightning set so far imo!
And the rest of the ideo is gold quality as usual. You're my favorite gear youtuber Caleb. Thank you for everything.
Aw thank you so much Benjamin! That really means a lot to hear!
Yup, I that was the first thing I noticed. Loved the atmosphere it created
YES. On camera microphone video please, dude! That'd be so cool! Got 2 NTG2s arriving today c: wish this video was just a few days earlier haha
Didn't watch when you originally posted but shopping for a mic now. Thanks for this. You're always on point. Happy new year!
a HUGE help! you've helped me so much with my set up and I'm thinking of getting that NTG5, love the sensitivity, especially for ASMR. Thank you!
You're videos teach me so much, I'm not sure where I'd be without your videos Thank you so much for your hard work!
Thank you for the kind words! Glad you enjoy them!
Thank you sir, been thinking about this very thing recently. Appreciate the constant value you bring!
Thanks for the effort you clearly put in this video! Plus: Man, that background! Awesome!
I love the lighting setup behind you in the talking head segments.
Thank you Adam!
We’ve been needing this for SO LONG! You’re the best person to do it, 100% killed it! I’m curious...a lot of audio guys I work with on sets swear by the Schoeps microphones for any audio, both on set and in an interview setting. Any reason why those didn’t make the lineup?
Awesome comparison tests between so many mics these kind of videos are so helpful 💚
Thank you sir! Just recently purchased the 416. Great sounding mic.
FINALLY. I've been hoping you do an updated mic video.
oliur here ????
Thanks for taking the time to make this. I was looking to buy the same mic.
Fantastic video and great break down of the various mics. This was really helpful. Would you mind sharing what external recorder you are using, or would recommend?
Hi Rodney!
@@TheBrothersMurph Fancy meeting you here :)
Been waiting for this thumbnail ever since your teaser video a couple weeks ago on Instagram! So solid 😍
Daang love that studio backdrop design 👌
Excellent, concise shootout, Caleb! I love my 416. Because it gets mention so often in these shotgun tests, you'd think there's an inherent bias just because it's SUCH an industry standard, but then you test it and it just consistently averages up near the top of shootout tests like these. However, as Curtis likes to point out, finding the best microphone out that gives you stellar of the box results is a very bespoke exercise specific to your voice.
The NTG4+ was recommended to me by some people, but I’m glad I watched this video.
I like my NTG4+ and works great if you are a run and gun shooter because of the internal features.
I have it and although I never compared it as methodically as we see here, I find that it us pretty good, depending on one's use cases.
I actually liked it more than some of the others higher on the quality list. It's not as clean but I find the voice is more readable which might be more important in some situations.
I have to wonder if the voice he used for the test wasn’t too low for the microphone. The NTG4+ tends to do a better job of picking up higher-pitched voices and is much more sensitive in that range. If a female UA-camr did a similar comparison, she might reach a different conclusion, especially with the MKH 416’s aggressive presence boost.
I had a matched pair of Rode NT5's for years that I absolutely loved. My big problem with them was the lack of a switchable pad on the mic itself. They were absolutely amazing to use as overheads on drums for genres like Jazz where you don't necessarily want to close-mic the toms. They were just too sensitive for my liking on instruments. All they needed was a built in pad to make them perfect.
You are clearly reading my thoughts - I’ve been looking for a mic for days!! Wizard!!
Very well performed test: compliments! Love the Sennheiser as wel. Bought the NTG3 because of the price difference. But your test made me rethink. Thanks again! Very well done.
Very timely!
I was researching a mic after I did some room treatments and was leaning towards a shotgun.
Thanks!
Love your lighting in the video - especially with the use of the cookie window simulation.
Great test! thanks for doing this. I am a bit confused on the math with the Rode NT5. Sensitivity: 3 points, Rear Rejection: 6 points, Side Rejection 1 point: Quality of sound: 12 points. 22 points total. but you have it in 11th place with 15. The only reason I noticed it was because after getting the top score on the quality, I thought it was weird it only had 3 other points from everything else. Not a huge deal obviously, just curious! Again, great test!
Just here to say thank you. You've really provided more insights on which mic I should buy based on my needs.
I bought a used 416 a couple of years ago and it makes me genuinely happy to use it because of the quality it produces.
Hey nice video as always!
For indoor recording you should have probably tested more small diaphragm mics with either hyper or super cardioid pattern like the Audix scx1-hc or the Audio Technica at4053b.
But I guess you can never go wrong with the 416 ;)
I got the MKE 600 probably 5 years ago and it has served me well - especially for $330
Your set is amazing....colors, background blur, everything ...awesome!
Whoa! Talk about an undeniable thumbnail! You're going to get 100% click through rate on this one!
Aw thanks!
Thanks for the test and review. For me personally, after watching this video I would go with the NTG5 for situations when I need to reject as much surround sound as possible to make sure the subject I’m recording gets no other distractions.
Former Technical Production Manager & Senior Technician for a corporate AV company, video producer/editor and musician here.. when I watch your videos your know your stuff and your ear is spot on ~ superb work! 🙏
I'm glad you started off with the disclaimer about this being a test to your specs because the right mic is so specific to each individual need. Great video but unsurprised that the 416 came out on top. It's been The King of shotguns for over 30 years now - and for very good reason. Enjoy it!
I think your tests are excellent at exposing the issue of "best" in many areas. It's really about the "best tool for the job" as one can see the different strengths and weaknesses of each.
It would be interesting to extend your tests, using the same mics, for different use cases. Examples might be, indoor dialog, on camera, outdoor dialog, outdoor reach. This is very much why a good sound person often has a "tool kit" of microphones so they can pull out the right one for the environment. To make it even more fun, after you do the tests and commentary, perhaps have Curtis Judd provide his own as well showing how two sets of ears might evaluate the same test results.
It's like you're in my head. Been on the hunt for a new shotgun mic all week. Wow!
Great methodology and an array of tests. Thank you!
Love the studio setup with the "window" light! SOOO good!
Amazing Analysis. thank you very much!
The Sennheiser MKH416 is very well respected and no wonder it has been used for decades by pros. Thanks for making this video.
Great job with this video. Knowing how you are going to use your mic before picking one is what you don't see enough of. Cheers
Wow. I’m so thankful for pros like you that are willing, able and just do this work right for all of us out here trying to figure it out! 1000% love this, keep up the great content 🙏🏼🔥💥
P.S. love the Shakespeare & nice tee, where’s that from? Or don’t tell, I get it with clothes (maybe don’t tell) 😅
Great comparison Caleb. The 416 seems to be a classic for decades. Thus I am wondering how the 80x0 Sennheisers which were engineered just a couple of years ago stack up against it.
Fantastic video and tests! I was getting worried for my Octava's until your sound quality test 😈
You absolute fucking legend. No bullshit, you said what you wanted, performed controlled tests and then analysed the results at the end instead of just presenting meaningless data. First time I've ever watched a review without feeling the need to watch another.
Watching this on my iPad means that all recordings sound the same 😁 But thanks for a really great video and observations!
Thank you! I just ordered the Azden SGM 3500L.
Very good review. Gives me some ideas. I own a few of them and the one I love is my Sennheiser MKH416. I can't do any project without it.
Amazing video! Thanks for doing this Caleb!
Oh man. I wish you'd done this 9 months ago. I ended up buying a Rode NTG2. It's great, but I'd have loved to really see this comparison before I'd bought. Great job Caleb!
That set is so beautifully lit. Wow.
Definitely want the on camera video version of this asap.
I have the Sennheiser ME66 and I believe it’s quite similar to the MKE600, I couldn’t be more happier considering it kicks around used for about 150-200. Great comparisons!
I'll have to check that one out too!
I think a front to back and front to side difference would be more useful than raw numbers but since you gave us the data we can calculate that ourselves if we want so thank you for that! My reasoning is once you tweak your gain based on the output from the front of the mic, how many DB quieter it is from the side will give you an idea of off axis rejection. If a mic has lower front output, you'll have to turn up the gain more than a mic that has higher native outtput to compensate, which will also raise the levels received from the side.
Glad someone else had this same thought. For example the Rode NTG4+ had a low -11.1db for sensitivity, so the -23.6db from the back is really only -12.5db less than from the front, when you boost the NGT4+ up to nominal levels the back-facing sound will also be boosted, so you have to account for the sensitivity as well. Comparatively the NTG5 had a base sensitivity of 5.0db, and a read sensitivity of -20db, meaning the rear rejection is a relative -25db compared to the front. This would completely rearrange the values.
It's possible the numbers shown were rearOrSideSensitivity - frontSensitivity, but the video makes it seem like they're just the raw sensitivity from the directions.
😃Side note: I LOVE what you've done with your background (much better for UA-cam to render...without banding😆
**Very** thorough! This is a service to the community!
Thanks for including the vocal "clarity" snippets: it allowed me to make my own subjective judgement. :)
I think Azden is a really underappreciated manufacturer. Most of the stuff they make is rock-solid.
Love this channel always learning !
Thank you thank you thank you been trying to dive in to researching shotguns
The 416 is great. Been using it for a year and I couldn't do without it now.
Besides all that, the 416 has an RF transducer circuit (or whatever it's called) which means it is far less sensitive to humidity and other weather conditions. A great mic, I've used it a lot.
Your channel is awesome! It's helping me a lot as a retool my own channel. Thanks for all your helpful information.
I'm not surprised by the results. I absolutely adore my 416.
Interesting video! I didn't know about pencil condenser mics before watching this!
The quality of this video is just stupid good! Very good stuff!
Loving the lighting man...Artsy yet straight up...
Nice. We have been using the Senn 416 in the booth, well a closet, for a while. Great sound. Picked it up as a package deal at B&H that included a Zoom H5 for an additional $50.
One metric I wish you covered was distance. Rejection is great (I needed to know this too), but I've seen folks unhappy with the budget options because when you move just slightly away from the mic the tonality changes.
The best set designs on UA-cam! 👌
I'll have to watch the first minutes again coz that's all I was thinking about.
Perfect Timing!! Thank you!
I feel like this video (and the summary of which mics are good for what scenario) is the detailed explanation of what most filmmaking UA-camrs are thinking when they say “it depends” lol. I’m going to have to watch a couple more times to spot everything, although the Mk 416 conclusion is consistent with what I’ve always heard about “best shotgun mic”.
That said, I always appreciate when someone actually gives their opinion instead of dodging the question, thanks Caleb for a great video!
Also, I am a HUGE FAN of the studio background! Very creative and gutsy choices, like a splash of film noir with that lamp!
PS congrats on your new mic!
Loving the new lighting setup. And thanks for putting this test together. When you measure distance from Mic to speaker, did you use the front or the back of the interference tube? Because on a long shotgun, that could be a pretty significant difference compared to pencil condenser with the element right up front.
also interesting about the SENNHEISER MKE600 is, that it can be used both ways: phantom powered, or with an internal battery.
Love the title page image with a ludicrous number of mics! I’d like to see the video mic comparison you mention.
Love the microphones on the yellow background. Very thorough review. We'll probably try out the Rode NTG5 when we have more in our budget...
Awesome video and review!!Very detailed review for shotgun mics!!It was very helpful!Keep up the good work!!Thank you for sharing it with us!!😊🙏🙏👌
Hi mate, excellent video - thanks for making it. Don’t know if you’re aware of the SE Electronics SE8 - which I bought earlier this year to boom over dialogue and works AMAZING. It is super sensitive, extremely low noise (for pencil condenser) and has a nice flat curve that delivers a rich sound even at boom distance. I looked at the RODE M5, RODE NT5 and other mics too and found the SE8 to be the best. Thanks again for the terrific content you create. Cheers.
Brilliant video. Thank you!
Loved it. Definitely do on camera mic test!!!!
dude this is a great test. these are the same criteria i'd have if I were testing mics. I need good rejection and good sensitivity, don't really care about much else. thanks
Man... your attention to detail is legendary.
Aw thanks man!!!
Thank you for this very interesting video! Just One question, once you got the difference in sensitivity after the first test, did you set the gain for the different microphones accordingly before the two next tests? It would be very important as the rejection test has to be done while the different microphones are able to catch at the same level the source you want to record. Otherwise, it's normal that the NTG4 did better at rejection as its sensitivity is lower than the one from the other mics. Thank you!