2010 Cadillac SRX Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @hurleygreen927
    @hurleygreen927 10 місяців тому +1

    Just found a 2011 SRX BASE model with 116K miles, am loving it even though it doesn;t have all the bells and whistles! Thanks for your video!

  • @miguelcastillo2319
    @miguelcastillo2319 2 роки тому

    I’m gonna go get one this weekend a 2010 model but i keep getting bad reviews was it worth it

  • @Jappotea
    @Jappotea 14 років тому +1

    this is the best review for the srx 2010 for now. It was very helpful and informative.
    thank you

  • @parsley0120
    @parsley0120 14 років тому

    GM is putting a 3.0 V6 in the SRX but you can opt for a 2.8 Turbo V6 if you choose.

  • @EricAtMazda
    @EricAtMazda 15 років тому

    the 2.8 hasn't launched yet last time I checked, supposed to be available later in the model year

  • @iminlov3
    @iminlov3 14 років тому

    does this thing drive good??? ive been hearing mixed reviews about the way it drives, and im thinkin of buying the FWD 3.0L version.... hmmm

  • @bg1379
    @bg1379 15 років тому +1

    Everyone has been talking matter-of-factly about it for some time now which had really confused me, but I guess it remains a lot of speculation.

  • @flatblackstrat
    @flatblackstrat 15 років тому

    Wow I dont know if youve driven a new c class dan but that speedometer is taken directly from it.

  • @iminlov3
    @iminlov3 14 років тому

    @mpgomatic is the difference between the turbo really worth the upgrade?

  • @madtownband
    @madtownband 13 років тому

    Mileage matters, but so does price. How much $ is it?

  • @bg1379
    @bg1379 15 років тому

    I'm so confused- why does everyone keep talking of this 2.8 when I can't find it on Cadillac's website (or any other) or the EPA's site?

  • @EricAtMazda
    @EricAtMazda 15 років тому

    well it's a Saab engine and I guess for some reason or another it's not ready for production just quite yet

  • @quatlen
    @quatlen 15 років тому

    Forget both! :D get the Audi q5 or Volvo XC60. The Glk doesn't look or feel like a typical Mercedes-Benz though.

  • @mpgomatic
    @mpgomatic  14 років тому

    @iminlov3 Go to the dealer and test drive the SRX and the CTS Wagon, back-to-back ... ;)

  • @mpgomatic
    @mpgomatic  12 років тому

    A journalism degree can be a big help, but it's not necessary. Writing skills are essential, however.

  • @themostoriginaluser
    @themostoriginaluser 14 років тому

    Great car, but maan those cargo nets on the back of front seats look cheap.

  • @taltigolt
    @taltigolt 15 років тому

    must be EXPENSIVE

  • @Waffleater1
    @Waffleater1 15 років тому

    I don't like the interior. It looks so dry and cold in black... I like the volvo XC60 and Q5 much better!!

  • @parsley0120
    @parsley0120 14 років тому

    Sorry posted my comment before they video started so you obviously knew that lol

  • @mpgomatic
    @mpgomatic  14 років тому

    @iminlov3 You gotta drive 'em both, look at your wallet, and decide for yourself.

  • @Hail2TheVictorsBaby
    @Hail2TheVictorsBaby 14 років тому

    ew...