Tamron 17-70 vs Sony 16-55 Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • The Tamron 17-70 and the Sony 16-55 are two of the best lenses for Sony APSC cameras currently but how do they compare to each other? In this video I'll walk you through each of these lenses and how they compare to each other. The Tamron 17-70 has image stabilization where the sony 16-55 does not which helps a lot for video shooters, when it comes to photos both these lenses perform really well but there are some slight differences.
    Check it out or order here: geni.us/gCsgJJQ (affiliate link)
    Download a few sample images here: geni.us/iLhYv
    Find my favorite camera and drone tech here:
    www.amazon.com... (affiliate link)
    I use Artlist for all my music: geni.us/kqV9l (affiliate link)
    Join my patreon to see behind the scenes content and more!
    www.patreon.com/jakesloan
    Connect on:
    Facebook: / jakesloanpage
    Instagram: / jakesloan
    Twitter: / jakesloaninak
    Jake Sloan
    PO BOX 212445
    Anchorage, AK 99521
    DISCLAIMER:
    Jake Sloan is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.
    This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 180

  • @phucmapvlog
    @phucmapvlog 3 роки тому +37

    I picked up the Tamron yesterday partially thanks to your review. I feel much better knowing I got this instead of the Sony

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      so glad to hear that! enjoy it

    • @cainthomas9169
      @cainthomas9169 3 роки тому

      i guess I'm kinda off topic but do anybody know of a good site to watch new tv shows online?

    • @yusufdustin5038
      @yusufdustin5038 3 роки тому

      @Cain Thomas lately I have been using FlixZone. You can find it on google =)

    • @kylerbenedict9214
      @kylerbenedict9214 3 роки тому

      @Yusuf Dustin definitely, I have been using flixzone for months myself :)

    • @cainthomas9169
      @cainthomas9169 3 роки тому

      @Yusuf Dustin thanks, I signed up and it seems to work =) I appreciate it !!

  • @martincoolee
    @martincoolee 3 роки тому +5

    New on your channel. Subscribed. Nice comparison, with no sales/advert talking. Personally I own 16-55 2.8 together with a6600 and I am super happy with this combo especially that I am still a beginner.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      Thank you very much! You have a GREAT combo!!

  • @VYiscool
    @VYiscool 3 роки тому +6

    you’re so underrated. this review sold it for me 😅 i’ll be getting it instead of the sony 16-55mm

  • @XHItube
    @XHItube 3 роки тому +11

    This lens alone makes Sony APSC very relevant again and more interesting to me than Fuji. Would be a great combination with the 70-350.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +2

      Absolutely would be a great combo

    • @amitkrupal1234
      @amitkrupal1234 3 роки тому +3

      We need 10-20 f/2.8 A RxD VC from Tamron to complete this Trio

    • @amitkrupal1234
      @amitkrupal1234 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan Just stopping down at f4 or 5.6 at 70mm makes it sharp than f/2.8?

    • @arfmf
      @arfmf 3 роки тому +3

      @@amitkrupal1234 make it 9-17 for me ;) It would be a dream, we desperately need an alternative to that Sony 10-18 F4.... even an 2.8 prime from 9 to 12mm would be killer with autofocus and VC, the wider angle + VC would differentiate it enough from the great 16mm F1.4 from Sigma...

    • @Reinh4
      @Reinh4 3 роки тому +1

      @@arfmf Tamron already announced a 12-24 APS-C which covers the wonderful range 18-35 in FF

  • @RobertPurdam
    @RobertPurdam 3 роки тому +4

    I have pre-ordered it and cannot wait for it to arrive!! It will live on my a6400. If and when I "upgrade" to FF I will be keeping this combo (along with my 70-350) as a lightweight setup.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      Fantastic!

    • @RobertPurdam
      @RobertPurdam 3 роки тому +1

      Well, mine has arrived and I'm very happy. I have to really pixel peep to see the softness at 70mm/f2.8. So far I don't think I would notice it in real world use.

  • @willchung651
    @willchung651 3 роки тому +3

    Will you do an a7c setup video in the future like you did for the a7 III? I chose the a7c over the a7 III for video shooting, but still want to do some photography. You mentioned that the a7c has less dials and buttons for photography so as a beginner, a video getting around the limited controls of the a7c but still being able to get full functionality for photography would be really good!

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      I will think about that! I idon't have the a7c currently but I might get it back and do one for you!

  • @FreeWillPhotos
    @FreeWillPhotos 3 роки тому +2

    Alaska is amazing. I lived in Fairbanks for 3 years and spent a lot of time at Chena Hot Springs, Angel Rocks, Mt. Denali and Valdez. There really is a lot to explore and capture out there. Good review and thank you for the honest feedback.

  • @MichTheo
    @MichTheo 3 роки тому +2

    Great comparison vid, besides all else I certainly appreciate that you respect the value of our time

  • @StefanMalloch
    @StefanMalloch 3 роки тому +5

    Yes!

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      The real question is: Did you download the files? Lol.

  • @ASVideo
    @ASVideo 3 роки тому +2

    At the same price wich one would you buy?
    I want the best quality/detail but it would be great to have the image stabilization (sony A6300)

    • @ih6901
      @ih6901 3 роки тому +1

      Same here - can get the 1655 for the same price as the 70 and now can't decide.

    • @ASVideo
      @ASVideo 3 роки тому

      @@ih6901 We need a super detailed comparison

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +2

      I would get the tarnron for sure the quality is so close and the stabilization is huge

    • @ih6901
      @ih6901 3 роки тому +1

      @@ASVideo I will go for the Tamron. ​Apart from Jakes video there is a very detailled (German) comparison here: ua-cam.com/video/OzRzBSV_dkQ/v-deo.html

    • @ASVideo
      @ASVideo 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan Thank you!!

  • @CarthagoMike
    @CarthagoMike 3 роки тому +2

    I really like the image the Tamron put out when you were vlogging with it. Is that straight out of the camera, unedited? If so, amazing colours!

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      This is all straight out of camera. I just make sure the white balance is correct and exposure is good.

  • @DWebbTheOldHead
    @DWebbTheOldHead Рік тому +1

    I purchased the Tamron 17-70mm for my ZV-E10, and I’m really diggin’ it. It just a good, solid, all-around lens. That extra 15mm really helps out a lot. The price tag on the 17-70 made it a no-brainer for me to purchase as well.
    Let’s see what Stewart’s can get me for this time.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  Рік тому

      nice lol, I spend way too much money there too

  • @deathcabbysusie7036
    @deathcabbysusie7036 3 роки тому +2

    very nice review 👍 now more video comparisson please or more video side content for 17-70

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you! did you watch this one? ua-cam.com/video/ZGP2SWKJ85w/v-deo.html it has a bit more video features

  • @Pirelli7
    @Pirelli7 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for this great review! I’ve a Sony a6500 and I'm a videomaker but, sometimes I made various shooting photos for the clients. I noticed a difference in term of sharp, Sony 16-55 is better but... as I understand it, there is no reason to buy the Sony 16-55 because the Tamron is definitely the best choise. (I’ve also a Sony 30mm 1.4 for portraits photos).
    I’d love to know what do you think about it.
    Sorry for my english 😂 🇮🇹

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      I agree, if you need the absolute best image quality Sony is better but if you need a bit more versatility you should get the Tamron

    • @valerio_c
      @valerio_c 9 місяців тому

      Il 16-55 sony in termini di qualità è il top per l’apsc, oggi costa circa 1300 euro praticamente il doppio del Tamron, il motivo è ovvio. Poi un 16mm mi da una spinta in più negli interni.. 1mm in basso conta. Ovviamente il Tamron è stabilizzato e come lente è ottima..

  • @808-Stat3
    @808-Stat3 3 роки тому +1

    Jake is an Alaskan spy. I just looked at both of these lenses a few days ago to waste my tax returns on and he popped out this video ... great video Jake. Much appreciated ;) keep up the great work. Aloha and happy new year

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      LOL Happy new year and cheers!!

  • @predrag1
    @predrag1 3 роки тому +4

    Preordered the tamron should have it mid january. Cant wait to see how it does for car videography. I plan to do a video on it.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      Awesome!

    • @DanKenj
      @DanKenj 3 роки тому +1

      Which lens are you using for your videos @NorCai, great video btw, sub!

    • @predrag1
      @predrag1 3 роки тому +1

      @@DanKenj thanks man. Sony 18-105 and sigma 30mm 1.4 but both those are gone. Recent videos are all with the sigma 30mm 1.4

    • @DanKenj
      @DanKenj 3 роки тому +1

      @@predrag1 Already got the Tamron? I had the SAME lens as you... Sold the sigma for now, and waiting the tamron to be released here in Europe

    • @predrag1
      @predrag1 3 роки тому

      @@DanKenj Should be an awesome lens for video. For photos, I use a canon 70-200 f4L with a mc11 adapter on my a6500

  • @OLuvin
    @OLuvin 3 роки тому +2

    If one has an a6600 and can get both lens for pretty nearly same price, which would be the better choice?

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +2

      I would still go for the Tamron 17-70 since you have a little bit more reach and the image stabilization really helps

    • @OLuvin
      @OLuvin 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan but does IBIS work together with 3rd party lenses? For some reason I thought Sony's IBIS only worked with (native) OSS lenses?
      And when it came to a 3rd party lense then you'd have to choose between either choosing the body's IBIS or the 3rd party lenses' version

    • @cpmaverick
      @cpmaverick 3 роки тому +1

      @@OLuvin Sony IBIS works with any lens that reports its focal length. For vintage or manual lenses without electronic contacts, you can still enable IBIS by going into Steady Shot settings and telling the camera what focal length you are using.
      So other than vintage zooms... Pretty much everything is covered.

  • @rictar_rat
    @rictar_rat 3 роки тому +2

    I have already Reserved mine at Stewart's Photo, I already have the 70-180 so it should pair with it :)

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      Fantastic! You shoot APSC? I've often wondered how the 70-180 performs on an APSC camera

    • @setaside2
      @setaside2 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan it's built to make the 60mp A7rIV happy which means it will make a 40mp APS-C sensor happy. It does fantastic work on the smaller sensor.

  • @Smaksum
    @Smaksum 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you. I was hoping you would get one to test. I have been watching this lens since it was announced. As of last Saturday none of my local shops know when they are getting stock yet. I don't pre-order until I see reviews so this made up my mind and my bank account smaller.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      LOL sorry about that!! It's a great lens and looks like it will start to hit shelves Jan 14-15 so hopefully you'll get yours around then! Cheers

  • @PaulFeinberg
    @PaulFeinberg 3 роки тому +2

    Another banger nice overview! I am no longer on APSC but it still excites me that Tamron is continuing to pump out awesome lenses.

  • @nepitaj4549
    @nepitaj4549 3 роки тому +1

    Where can I buy the Tamron lense for 799 US-Dollar? Here in Switzerland and Germany does the lense cost over 1100 US-Dollar and more

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      In the USA but I think you would have to pay too much shipping and VAT to make it worth it

  • @NickL0VIN
    @NickL0VIN 3 роки тому +1

    Sony A7C + Tamron 28-75mm vs. Sony a6600 + Tamron 17-70mm for travel? Same size but full frame setup $400 more expensive. Which to choose?

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      oh thats tough. you get the extra reach with the 17-70 but I think I would go for the a7c and a 28-200! check out my review here: ua-cam.com/video/csVOhi8uUQ4/v-deo.html

  • @boldyo
    @boldyo 4 місяці тому

    One thing I’d like to see in these kinds of comparisons with different focal lengths is to crop the 55 in the Sony in editing to match the 70mm of the Tamron and then say which is sharper.
    I often crop my photos in editing by a small amount and don’t notice a lot of difference. In this case with the Tamron a little soft at 70 it would be very interesting to know. Same would go for the Sigma 18-50.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  4 місяці тому +1

      I'll keep that in mind

  • @Zieloniwpodrozy
    @Zieloniwpodrozy 3 роки тому +1

    Great review and you are the only one to provide RAW samples. Thanks!

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      Thanks I'm glad they helped

  • @treloar2
    @treloar2 3 роки тому +5

    Great review! I always have one of the a6xxx bodies as a travel/back up camera. This is going to be the perfect “one lens” solution. And after seeing the Tamron images and video, so glad I never went for the 16-55 2.8.
    Thanks for all the great content!

  • @cedow1
    @cedow1 3 роки тому +1

    Nice comparison, can't wait to get mine! I have to 2 questions:
    1) did your A6400 need an update to use the lens and all it's functions or did the lens need an update?
    2) Is there already an optical correction profile available in lightroom? I saw some youtubers report that at 50mm and up there is some barrel distortion happening.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      There is no profile yet in Lightroom, The a6400 did not need an update to use just works like a native sony lens on the camera. You can see some of the photos at 55 and 70 there is a slight bit of distortion but it is very slight and will be easy to correct until a profile is available in light room.

  • @RameshSital
    @RameshSital 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome video man, really helpful! Also probs to for the transparency/honesty about the affiliate links, that's really inspirational!

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      So glad thanks a lot!!

  • @hmann18
    @hmann18 3 роки тому +1

    Hey Jake, I'm looking for a lens in this focal range for a A7 III, looking at the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 DG DN Art, do you have any other reccomendations for a lens I can use most of the time? Doing low light video work.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      That is an excellent lens for what you want to shoot. the only other one I would recommend in that range is the Tamron 28-75 f2.5 which is what I use

    • @hmann18
      @hmann18 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan Thanks mate, love your work

  • @AndrewJones-tj6et
    @AndrewJones-tj6et 3 роки тому +1

    Great review on this new Tamron lens and great idea to compare side by side with the Sony 16-55. Thankyou also for kindly providing a link to download the sample RAW files, so interesting to have a look at them in an editor (Capture One in my case) with lens corrections on and off. For sure will likely be getting this Tamron lens sometime this year.

  • @OLuvin
    @OLuvin 3 роки тому +5

    FINALLY!! Been waiting for this direct side-by-side comparison for weeks and finally you deliver 💥

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +2

      Awesome I hope it helped you!

  • @DanKenj
    @DanKenj 3 роки тому +1

    Great Review.... Probably selling my 18-105 hahaha

  • @alternativemushroom
    @alternativemushroom 3 роки тому +1

    great video, if possible it would be amazing to see a comparison with the 18-105 as that's what I am thinking of upgrading from

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +2

      That would be and I'm sure someone will do it. I don't have access to that lens unfortunately

  • @tracerclub
    @tracerclub 3 роки тому

    Halo Jake Sloan, i follow you and thanks for all information, there is only one problem, i pay 300 to Artlist for no copyright music and all the time have a copyright claim from you tube, this company is so trustworthy have your mine for that. i have all the documents if you need. Thanks and sorry for this post but must you know your affiliates

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      Have you reached out to artlist to see why? I haven’t had an issue in over 500 videos

    • @tracerclub
      @tracerclub 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan Yes and we try to find a solution, its crazy that more than two hours with email & etc. 1 video 2 copyright claim with different songs. I hope this stops and I continue to create videos. Thanks again

  • @kiwi1911
    @kiwi1911 3 роки тому +1

    If I get both the lenses at the same price, which one do you recommend. I don't do videos that much and am confined to vacation photos. I want the images to be as sharp as possible.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      The 16-55 then for sure

    • @kiwi1911
      @kiwi1911 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan thanks

  • @1312channel
    @1312channel 3 роки тому +1

    Great comparison video! Thank you.

  • @MarkH163
    @MarkH163 3 роки тому +1

    I would say the Tamron 17-70 does give the Sony lens a run for the money, especially with the in lens stabilzation. Really enjoy footage you shoot at that old mining camp!

  • @DominicSantini
    @DominicSantini 3 роки тому +1

    My only wish was that Tamron’s was smaller.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      That would be nice for travel but I’ve found it to be great and fits easily in every camera bag I use

  • @timohoffmann1888
    @timohoffmann1888 3 роки тому

    Thanks. I would like to see a comparison between the tamron and the sigma 24-70 mm 2.8. Thank you

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      Unfortunately I don't have access to that lens

  • @amitkrupal1234
    @amitkrupal1234 3 роки тому +1

    How much vignetting is present when used on full frame A7 series in full frame mode

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      quite a bit! you need the full 1.5 crop to get rid of it

    • @amitkrupal1234
      @amitkrupal1234 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan Ok. I have observed that 18-105 lens has less less vignetting on full frame from 50 mm onwards was hoping this might have same. Still this is vfm lens

  • @alternativemushroom
    @alternativemushroom 3 роки тому +1

    Is it true that the VC on the tamron only works in video? You say at 5:00 that you used it for stills too, could you confirm? thanks

    • @matthieuperbal527
      @matthieuperbal527 3 роки тому +1

      VC available for both, but the added AI feature kicks in only for video.

    • @alternativemushroom
      @alternativemushroom 3 роки тому

      @@matthieuperbal527 brilliant thank you

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      Matthieu is correct!

  • @patconlon5757
    @patconlon5757 2 роки тому +1

    I like the tamron, it is bulky though

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  2 роки тому

      I do too and it's really not that much larger considering it adds in lens stabilization

  • @andreysidorenko5247
    @andreysidorenko5247 3 роки тому +1

    I live in Alaska and was wondering if you need a license to fly (as a hobby)?

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      no as a hobby but do check where you can fly by using apps like Airmap

    • @andreysidorenko5247
      @andreysidorenko5247 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan Thanks

    • @andreysidorenko5247
      @andreysidorenko5247 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan sorry if it was out of context. Fly as in drones as a hobby

  • @craigdaffin7479
    @craigdaffin7479 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks Jake, great video and information!

  • @anmoldhamija6666
    @anmoldhamija6666 3 роки тому +1

    Tamron 17-70 vs sony 18-105 🤔what do you think ?

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      Would be interesting but the Tamron will perform better in low light and give you more blurred out backgrounds

    • @anmoldhamija6666
      @anmoldhamija6666 3 роки тому +1

      @@JakeSloan was thinking how many times do i actually go down to f2.8....and with 1 stop difference in an indoor environment I will still have to use flash :)

    • @anmoldhamija6666
      @anmoldhamija6666 3 роки тому

      Also, how does this lens compare to sony 16-70 f4 in terms of sharpness?

  • @MarlonKingShow
    @MarlonKingShow 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks for the a6400 video test. I think that has helped me make my decision. I'm thinking of replacing my 18-105, will lose some zoom but gain the light stop.

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      absolutely

    • @michalmason5490
      @michalmason5490 3 роки тому

      I sold my 18-105 and bought 16-55. It's a wonderful lens. I don't take it off my a6500. I might buy Tamron 17-70 to use it with a6000 & a6400 since they lack IBIS which now Tamron has. Btw, won't notice the lack of range. For that buy simple a telephoto lens 70-350.

  • @cyrilbrunner8375
    @cyrilbrunner8375 3 роки тому

    Here in Switzerland, the Tamron costs 1100 bucks and I could get de Sony 16-55 for 850. Considering this price difference, what should I do ?

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      If you can save that much I would probably get the 16-55. Especially if you have a camera with ibis built it.

  • @maurigarciamusic
    @maurigarciamusic 3 роки тому

    If you have to choose between the a6600 with 16 55 2.8 G vs a7c with kit lens 28 60 who wins ? For cinematic videos :)

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому +1

      I think I would go with the A7c and kit lens for now and upgrade the lens down the road

  • @alwaysbeStreaming
    @alwaysbeStreaming 3 роки тому +1

    Love your videos... Keep up the great work and stay safe!

  • @vatinnifora
    @vatinnifora 3 роки тому

    how about Tamron 17-70 vs Sony 18-105 f4? do you think it's a fair comparison? how's the Sony quality in respect to this new (much newer) Tamron?
    BTW great video, fantastic location. keep up. thanks

  • @totocar_
    @totocar_ 3 роки тому

    great video but I think you missed one aspect
    you did not zoom in in post to compare the sharpness! which i am very interested?
    would you be able to give me the answer?

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      I did zoom in to show but I also provide raw for you to download and make up your own mind

  • @Reinh4
    @Reinh4 3 роки тому

    Have seen in other videos that bokeh lights suffer from heavy onion rings. What a pity when doing portraits!!

  • @joelwaghela
    @joelwaghela 3 роки тому +1

    Another amazing review. Thank you Jake!

  • @KristofferLislegaard
    @KristofferLislegaard 3 роки тому

    I have to say the crazy color shift is the only thing keeping me from getting this lens. As someone who does multi camera video I think it will be to much of a hassle. Thanks for pointing that out.

  • @zvolheim
    @zvolheim 3 роки тому

    Does this work with full frame Sony’s? Like the FE lenses? I’m curious if it is because I don’t wanna get it if it’s going to crop it...

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      it's a crop sensor lens as I said in the video so any full frame camera will have to crop in

  • @alaskasnowdays9139
    @alaskasnowdays9139 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the great comparison

  • @kolapyellow7631
    @kolapyellow7631 3 роки тому +1

    Beautiful ice country.

  • @mutlubirfilm310
    @mutlubirfilm310 3 роки тому

    hi, did you hear a strange noise as I zoom in on the tamron in the cold?

  • @GoO0f
    @GoO0f 3 роки тому

    Just turned up my heating after watching your videos...! Thanks a lot for the helpful videos!

  • @gers709
    @gers709 3 роки тому

    Hello. did you set the white balance manually when taking the photos?

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      I did but as I said in the video the lighting was changing rapidly so it made it a challenge

  • @SGaluev
    @SGaluev 3 роки тому

    У меня a6400 и объективы Sigma 16 mm 1.4 и Sony 50 mm 1.8. Ты бы продал эти объективы, чтобы купить Tamron? 80% я снимаю видео (танцы), 20% фото

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      I think I would stay with the lenses you have unless you really just want one lens to film everything with but are willing to have less background blur.

    • @SGaluev
      @SGaluev 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan Но это не очень удобно каждый раз снимать со стабилизатора один объектив, менять его на другой и снова делать балансировку... Вот я и задумался над zoom объективом... Неужели такая большая разница в размытии фона?

  • @Muhiddin92
    @Muhiddin92 3 роки тому

    i see 16mm and 17mm have quite big difference in view

  • @ewansabri1054
    @ewansabri1054 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you !

  • @rafaelcruz2598
    @rafaelcruz2598 2 роки тому

    Merci BEAUCOUP ! Depuis la France 🥐🥖

  • @nguyenfrankie5279
    @nguyenfrankie5279 3 роки тому +1

    I Like 16-55G build :D

    • @JakeSloan
      @JakeSloan  3 роки тому

      Thats a valid reason to get it. Sony lenses are really well built

    • @nguyenfrankie5279
      @nguyenfrankie5279 3 роки тому

      @@JakeSloan but 16-55G is a beast :D

    • @Reinh4
      @Reinh4 3 роки тому

      @@nguyenfrankie5279 No stabilization, a fail

  • @KevinAgastya
    @KevinAgastya 3 роки тому

    This is the video that we need! 💣

  • @joshuayeldose6796
    @joshuayeldose6796 3 роки тому

    My favorite Alaskan reviewer

  • @Andrey_Makarov
    @Andrey_Makarov 3 роки тому

    Спасибо! Отличный обзор! Потрясающая локация!