For a country whose defense budget is 70 billion, this is very good. It is even repugnant to the United States, whose defense budget is 850 billion dollars!!
Yes surely are when you see the ukrainian countryside littered with super tanks that could smash any enemy one easily.That s what they said and imagined. Well at least when they are dreaming. Hahahah......
But have so little budget to work with. Russia GDP is smaller then China, Japan, Germany, India, UK, France, Italy, Canada, and Brazil. And too much bureaucracy and corruption.
And Yet Russians can't build anything other than weapons.. meanwhile, haters call the USA a "military war machine" on US social media their everyday life composed entirely of US technology and culture.
@@ryano.8768 Are you serious? Or just brainwashed? Show me faster rocket/bomb then Khinzal(the dagger)and i will show you my wife' p.Or my d.I dont want to hurt your feelings ;).
@@nottheroyalnavy this guy showed you! He said it's a commercial aircraft... Nobody knew that except him cus he is the smortest person on UA-cam bar none.. Hope you learned
@@AC-Ninja I knew that cuz it's the most obvious fact about the Concorde the fact that it's the second fastest commercial aircraft with a top speed of Mach 2.02 and anyway I never said it wasn't a commercial plane I just said that it is almost the same speed as it soo stop making a fool of urself
I heard the Concordsky Tu-144 topped out at around mach 2.3... How do all of these larger supersonic aircraft compare to the fighters currently in use in terms of speed and range?
@@karengebers7689 only because we’re giving them weapons and jets to fight the Russians off with. If it weren’t for UN and specifically US intervention Russia could have been doing better. Not saying I want my least favorite country to win just saying they’re only losing because Ukraine has the father of all military suppliers on it’s side
@@kgaogelomoloto1454 The Boeing B1 first appeared in 1974. The Russian copy came out shortly after. Stolen tech. The US has all but retired them. There are something like 30-40 still flying. Stealth has pretty much replaced the speed factor. Although the B1B is still a force to be reckoned with.
In service. The XB70 Valkyrie had a top speed over Mach 3 in the 1960s, much faster than the TU160. It suffered the same problem all non stealth bombers have, they are not survivable over well defended enemy territory.
The TU has been upgraded to be a missile carrier especially the hypersonic ones it's no longer required to get into range of ground airdefence. It's main job would be to attack high priority targets. Let's hope we all don't have to find out if it's any good and ask for peace from or warmongering Elites.
The Bone would have been faster except for when Carter neutered the program and fucked the engines and intakes …. Plus the Russian plane has to stop for repairs and gas a lot , when it isn’t killing its crew with toxic exhaust
You need to learn history, and a little aerospace engineering - The B-1A as a high fast nuclear bomber was obsolete before it flew ( just like the Tu-190 was and is) and was cancelled. Repurposing it to low level penetration nuclear bomber required altering the air intakes for greater efficiency and better low altitude performance.
It also spews nitric oxide that turns into nitric acid in air when it takes off because the engines are running fuel rich. That's why the jet wash is usually orange at takeoff.
Supersonic bomber for tuday, does not more competitive than simple B- 52 for example. Because of this also US canceled B1A (that was same mach 2) and approved B1B, that slower, but partially stealth. Because for air defence missile that can fly mach 6 or even more, it doesn't matter at all which speed have bomber: 0.5M, 1M, or 2M. In modern war T160, or B1B, or B52 - they all can just deliver cruise missiles closer to target and fire them from safe distance. They all can't fly close to target, because any non stealth and non hyperaonic bomber is very tasty target for even not very advanced air defence missile.
Speed doesn't need for bomber only when you have airbase near. For example Ramstein airbase when bombing Serbia, or Engels when bomb Ukraine. But bombers are made for battle against powerful enemy, which one placed on the over side of the ocean. You fly 2 times faster - you bomb better
The aircraft shown to be under construction certainly wasn't a TU-160, the Yanks may bring out a newer version of the Valkyrie, Mach 3 Bomber, from the late 50's, or give back what the peanut farmer took away, the B1A's speed!
@@shadowreaper4884 Yes us American like nice things. What does your country try to make stuff or what?? Really if u have the ability to be the best DO IT!! NO SHAME IN BEING #1😀💯🇺🇸🇺🇦👍
Tell us, what other design could it possibly be made to look like, given it's job mission of being a supersonic bomber? You people who post like that sound like idiots. Any other design would not work as efficiently as the design it and the b1 has.
No but when you dive in this bomber and then release missiles, those missiles become faster. Add to that the “juke” or zig-zag quality of some recent Russian missiles, and oops, we may have a problem!
The Tu-160 is just the B-1, but worse. To elaborate, the Tu-160 releases toxic gasses when it takes off, it still runs on old outdated equipment, and is basically just a carbon copy of the B-1.
Ah yes. A carbon copy. That only shares the swing wing feature, and the role of strategic bomber. The B-1B is smaller and harder do detect, but is slower. While the Blackjack is larger and goes almost twice as fast, but has far worse avionics, is easier to detext and has inneficient engines. But they can't be called carbon copies.
Russia is not a super power. They have no effective navy, and their air force is a joke. They can't even defeat their next door neighbor. The only thing Russia has is man power, but the army leadership is also a joke, as evidenced by all the men that are sent to go die for nothing.
@@christophernichols114 much lower radar cross section., unlike white swan. They’ve been through hostile airspace often, unlike Tu 160 that launches from inside Russia.
Sure enough, the Tupolev Tu-160 (NATO reporting name: Blackjack) and the Rockwell International B-1 look quite similar at first glance,” Leone said in an op-ed. “Much has been said about the apparent Soviet custom of copying Western designs; this postulate is rooted in a firm conviction that Russia cannot produce anything worthwhile.”
@@statk22 yes and that’s quite unfortunate because of some very shortsighted people at NASA. The reason given was to keep Russian scientist employed as we thought they would go to rogue nations and use their technology for nuclear weapons.
@@kkjoe1911why the laughings ?? Modern Russia is a pretty young country in the 90s they struggled a lot but yet 20 years later they managed to get back to the military and political scenes, impressive I'd say
Except it’s not. The North American XB-70 Valkyrie has a top speed of 2,056 mph. The US also has the only heavy stealth strategic bomber B-2 Spirit. And the largest strategic heavy bomber B-52 stratofortress. In fact the only 3 strategic bombers I know of are from the US. The B-1B Lancer, B-52 Stratofortress, and the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber. We have superior fighters as well.
@@duanemarshall1889only 1 crash after years of service and you call it bad How bout the f-35 that crashes every minute just cause it's so advanced that it even once turned into a sub in south China sea lol
If you'd like to know the world's deadliest fighter jet watch now!!! ua-cam.com/users/shortsgkh1prhHvlw?feature=share
fInally someone agreeed
Too bad Russia can only manage to get 16 off the ground. 🤣
Nooe
WTF ???
excellent
The legends know it’s real name: Alkonost
agahhaahah fr
Yes
gta5 fanboy
I was looking for this comment
Nah fr bro 😂😂
One of the most beautiful planes in use to this day
Most beautiful things can be most deadly.
B-1 ripoff
It was designed before B-1@@duggie6717
@@duggie6717jealous?
The White Swan!
The XB-70 in white
Poet😂
Macross
I was searching for this comment😂
Yes the White Swan not the stupid Nato name of Blackjack.
Talks about the TU-160.... Throws in some BONE video clips because reasons...
I only saw one B-1 clip, but did see a SU-57 lol
I bidding see any. I was looking for some canards and didn’t find
I mean he didn't show the videos but he said what the title meant.
burning of buttocks in jealousy!#!! 😄😄😄😁LONG LIVE RUSSIA
Exactly 💯
Imagine if Bombers could do cobra maneuvers lol
The su 57 can, basically as large as the tu-160
@@Yes_im.a-lordpeacock20m/54m length
@@Yes_im.a-lordpeacockyou trippin
@@Robert-Cinque777 it's a joke
F111 ardvark
A Beautiful Machine! ✈️
Though their avionics and radar are from the 80’s and 90’s, Russian aircraft are pure eye candy to look at.
Russia does have a history of making gorgeous aircrafts!
The Russain upgrade all equipment and electronics in the old plans. The USA did the same things on the B52.
Doubt a nearly obsolete american SAMs can shoot it.
They've all been upgraded with the latest modern avionics.
For a country whose defense budget is 70 billion, this is very good. It is even repugnant to the United States, whose defense budget is 850 billion dollars!!
I love these aircraft, they're so cool.
Russian engineers are amazing 😍
They copied ours so reaserch
@@mosthatedandroidtunernolim9800 🥱😏
Yes surely are when you see the ukrainian countryside littered with super tanks that could smash any enemy one easily.That s what they said and imagined. Well at least when they are dreaming. Hahahah......
@@mosthatedandroidtunernolim9800 German design copied from USA.
But have so little budget to work with. Russia GDP is smaller then China, Japan, Germany, India, UK, France, Italy, Canada, and Brazil. And too much bureaucracy and corruption.
My grandpa OJ Chandler that passed away helped design the B-52. Every time I see a video of it I think of him. Rest In Peace grandpa 🕊️
You have my condolences.😔
It really looks like a "white swan" - what a beauty 🤍
Ops u forgot it has a 40 ton payload AND A FRIKING ROTARY LAUNCHER WITH 12 Kh-55 missiles
"Spot the difference" *pulls out a picture of the TU-160 and the B-1 Lancer*
"There the same picture"
Hey, can I copy your homework?
Yeah, just don't make it too obvious
@@_TheUpsetGerman *how obvious he makes it:*
@@ryanpowers7083 Hey, when was that 1940s 4 engine , 10 ton payload heavy bomber project due again?
THATS WHAT IM SAYIN’
thay are just black and white
beautifull bomber ever made
It’s a US design.
@@JackMyersPhotographystolen from Russians
@@JackMyersPhotographynah b-1b is different those who studies military will understand you are just a overexcited npc.
@@Dxyzxyz and when were the planes first designed?
@@JackMyersPhotography there is no such thing is a US design! US is like china who loves to copy!
Jesus christ that things siiick
#xb70
Красота !!! А если ещё учесть что начинка современная .......
Best tecnology ever build in the world...
Informative and enlightening video on TU - 160 - the world's fastest Bomber!
Russia has some serious tech
From the 70’s
And Yet Russians can't build anything other than weapons.. meanwhile, haters call the USA a "military war machine" on US social media their everyday life composed entirely of US technology and culture.
@@ryano.8768 Are you serious? Or just brainwashed? Show me faster rocket/bomb then Khinzal(the dagger)and i will show you my wife' p.Or my d.I dont want to hurt your feelings ;).
@@ryano.8768 considering they spend far less than the US on military budget it’s way more impressive
@@ryano.8768 And they are very close to US in terms of military
This is the deadly bomber
So pretty much the Concorde could cruise with it
Concorde is a commercial aircraft
@@yungtye ik just sayin
@@nottheroyalnavy this guy showed you! He said it's a commercial aircraft... Nobody knew that except him cus he is the smortest person on UA-cam bar none.. Hope you learned
@@AC-Ninja I knew that cuz it's the most obvious fact about the Concorde the fact that it's the second fastest commercial aircraft with a top speed of Mach 2.02 and anyway I never said it wasn't a commercial plane I just said that it is almost the same speed as it soo stop making a fool of urself
I heard the Concordsky Tu-144 topped out at around mach 2.3...
How do all of these larger supersonic aircraft compare to the fighters currently in use in terms of speed and range?
Beautiful ❤
DESLUMBRANTE E MAGNÍFICO ESSA MÁQUINA VOADORA PARABÉNS UM EXCELENTE VÍDEO
Russian maal is always on 🔥🔥🔥
Russian Maal😂❤
a beauty!
A bird of justice!
Absolutely Amazing..!!!
Powerful bomber, but the range that it can release its pretty deadly ordnance and head for home is its most impressive statistic.
From russia to venezuela.
already did !!
Love you Russia 🇷🇺 from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
Bra u literally just gave me the details of the b1 lancer
Bone can only go ≈1000mph. Tu-160 has about 300mph on it
🤭
The tu160 is bigger and has a longer range but with less payload
@@alejandrabarron3977tu160 have a bigger payload capacity
EXTRAORDINARIO FENÓMENO INSPIRACIÓN......
Russia is so good and brilliant to make Fighter jet and boomber aircraft!!!
Yet they still lose to the US. Lol we have better fighters and bombers
Yeah Russia is great lol that's why there getting their asses handed to them in Ukraine right now 🇺🇦🇺🇸💯💪
@@karengebers7689 only because we’re giving them weapons and jets to fight the Russians off with. If it weren’t for UN and specifically US intervention Russia could have been doing better. Not saying I want my least favorite country to win just saying they’re only losing because Ukraine has the father of all military suppliers on it’s side
@@karengebers7689you mean like how the US got handed their asses to them in Afghanistan and Vietnam 😂
@@lllllllllllllll9062 Ukraine is Russia's Vietnam.
Little known facts the B-1 Lancer was designed after this thing was in production
B1 first flight 1974
Tu-160 1981
First means better?
That’s not even remotely accurate.
@@FloridaManMatty no it definitely is
@@ClA_AGENT hehehehehehe
More military spending?
Challenge accepted!
then the coins fell
See it coming from miles away.
It’s equipped with the radar signature of a freshly painted cattle barn .
It also looks a lot like the b1
Exactly. But it's bigger. It's just fast. The b1 is fast and stealthy'ish
Because b1 copied it..
B1 copied it lol😂😂😂
@@kgaogelomoloto1454
The Boeing B1 first appeared in 1974. The Russian copy came out shortly after. Stolen tech. The US has all but retired them. There are something like 30-40 still flying. Stealth has pretty much replaced the speed factor. Although the B1B is still a force to be reckoned with.
The most sincere form of flattery is copy.
No wonder they were such a pain to shoot down. I’ve had to do two U turns just to get my second side winder on the kill. The first being flared
🤔😂😂
Scary yes still freaking awesome
Those blue flames 😍
*notices oppresser MkII on the map*
*Panic Ensues*
Flares
Excelent
In service. The XB70 Valkyrie had a top speed over Mach 3 in the 1960s, much faster than the TU160. It suffered the same problem all non stealth bombers have, they are not survivable over well defended enemy territory.
The TU has been upgraded to be a missile carrier especially the hypersonic ones it's no longer required to get into range of ground airdefence. It's main job would be to attack high priority targets.
Let's hope we all don't have to find out if it's any good and ask for peace from or warmongering Elites.
Nice 👍👍👍
Awesome bird❤❤
The accompanying jet presents a good representation of how big the TU-160 bomber is...😮
Good photo of the B1B you put up there!
North American XB-70 Valkyrie* leaves the chat *
Xb-70 never joined service.
@@edomin1148but it has flown
I ❤ this channel.
NICE INFORMATION, THANK YOU
The Bone would have been faster except for when Carter neutered the program and fucked the engines and intakes …. Plus the Russian plane has to stop for repairs and gas a lot , when it isn’t killing its crew with toxic exhaust
You gonna cry?
Speed is not that material anymore.
@@WALTERBROADDUS it has very bad stealth
You need to learn history, and a little aerospace engineering - The B-1A as a high fast nuclear bomber was obsolete before it flew ( just like the Tu-190 was and is) and was cancelled. Repurposing it to low level penetration nuclear bomber required altering the air intakes for greater efficiency and better low altitude performance.
Concord and the bone 🦴 mated and created the swan!
Vertical strakes on the outboard of the engines? Are they deployable, or added on other versions?
They already flew from russia to venezuela ,maquitia airport!!
Mach 2 is insane for an aircraft of that size, beautiful plane
Oh,today I has saw it in my town. I live in Zhukovsky, near Moscow🎉
Thrust specs don't sound right
It also spews nitric oxide that turns into nitric acid in air when it takes off because the engines are running fuel rich. That's why the jet wash is usually orange at takeoff.
Tu-160M takes off much cleaner with new engines.
ua-cam.com/video/2aok54gwiMs/v-deo.html
TU-160 says let me do it for u US
*defeats russia*
Every country: Wtf?!
Supersonic bomber for tuday, does not more competitive than simple B- 52 for example. Because of this also US canceled B1A (that was same mach 2) and approved B1B, that slower, but partially stealth. Because for air defence missile that can fly mach 6 or even more, it doesn't matter at all which speed have bomber: 0.5M, 1M, or 2M. In modern war T160, or B1B, or B52 - they all can just deliver cruise missiles closer to target and fire them from safe distance. They all can't fly close to target, because any non stealth and non hyperaonic bomber is very tasty target for even not very advanced air defence missile.
Tu-160's missiles are controllable. They can be launched in deep Russia and it will hit Ukraine for example. Well,they actually did it.
Speed doesn't need for bomber only when you have airbase near. For example Ramstein airbase when bombing Serbia, or Engels when bomb Ukraine. But bombers are made for battle against powerful enemy, which one placed on the over side of the ocean. You fly 2 times faster - you bomb better
The aircraft shown to be under construction certainly wasn't a TU-160, the Yanks may bring out a newer version of the Valkyrie, Mach 3 Bomber, from the late 50's, or give back what the peanut farmer took away, the B1A's speed!
Ah yes ofc the yanks need to have the best of everything because they are just sooo intelligent and untouchable
Yup ofc US is the best in everything, the most noble, others are terrorists, but never them. 🙇🏽♂️
@@shadowreaper4884 Yes us American like nice things. What does your country try to make stuff or what?? Really if u have the ability to be the best DO IT!! NO SHAME IN BEING #1😀💯🇺🇸🇺🇦👍
@@karengebers7689what is your country the #1 in again? 😂
@@lllllllllllllll9062 kicking the asses of Imperial nations & dictators with smaller less equipped armies & virtually no navy.
Looks awfully familiar
Tell us, what other design could it possibly be made to look like, given it's job mission of being a supersonic bomber? You people who post like that sound like idiots. Any other design would not work as efficiently as the design it and the b1 has.
The fastest bomber carrying the fastest missile 😅😅damn
Bro the xb-70 valkarye was both faster and heavier plus you’re showing some pictures of the b-1 lancer not the tu-160
Ok, then where is the xb 70
@@spotifaiprimium2770 wdym
“In service” bro-
Plus, he is showing Tu-160
@@Tango-17 not at all times
@@elite_ace479 yes at all times
The BONE is still more bad ass fight me
The B-1 is badass.
The TU-160 is beautiful and elegant
B1 is uglier.. the nose is not even pointy..
Very nice great eroplean thank you so much
When I look at the thumbnail of the short I thought I was the Concorde😂😂😂
Is it faster than a missile????
No.
No, but they can launch ICBM Missiles from the air. Bloody deadly.
No, but they still very deadly to play with
No but when you dive in this bomber and then release missiles, those missiles become faster. Add to that the “juke” or zig-zag quality of some recent Russian missiles, and oops, we may have a problem!
No it's invisible for SAm,kkkkkkk,You said it's invisible : said Serbian!
Can we talk about how there’s just a Soviet Concorde of bombs attached to it?
Bendiciones a esta gran Nación, Rusia es y siempre será gigante.
Veriy Nice aircraft .
Long life to Rusia and allies
So what about poor Ukraine?
Amazing.
TU160 and TU95.👏👏👏
Direct copy of the Boeing B1-B. Which is pretty much obsolete now….due to stealth technology.
The 70 year old B52 is still in service
@@jaythomas3224
I think it’s going to last forever
They are so different that even thinking that makes you an idiot
@@Ross72A
Hardly…nasty person.
The Tu-160 is just the B-1, but worse.
To elaborate, the Tu-160 releases toxic gasses when it takes off, it still runs on old outdated equipment, and is basically just a carbon copy of the B-1.
Ah yes. A carbon copy. That only shares the swing wing feature, and the role of strategic bomber. The B-1B is smaller and harder do detect, but is slower. While the Blackjack is larger and goes almost twice as fast, but has far worse avionics, is easier to detext and has inneficient engines. But they can't be called carbon copies.
@Enzo Humeau In this day and age, that's not good that they're modernizing the Tu-160
@@Choco-Man yup, the aircraft is way too expensive for them to maintain, let alone modernize.
Nonsense.😅
Basically a military Concorde 🔥🔝😍😈
That looks a lot like a concord, but it makes sense that, if somebody is making a large supersonic plane, they will be made very similar
Our Air force needs a bomber fleet with at least 10 such planes ro begin with and 20 more in next decade. Jai hind. ❤❤❤
How convenient that you forgot all about the B1-B (Blackjack) bomber, which was actually built first, and which this plane remarkably resembles.
No question no dough❤❤
Looks almost identical to a B1-B
Russia is a super power united state needs to respect Russia
Why?
@@jasondeaver2117because US so much on debt lol😂😂
@@user_a2w641 come try to collect
@@jasondeaver2117 buddy what to collect ??
Russia is not a super power. They have no effective navy, and their air force is a joke. They can't even defeat their next door neighbor. The only thing Russia has is man power, but the army leadership is also a joke, as evidenced by all the men that are sent to go die for nothing.
HUUUGE target on radar!
And so is Americas. So what's your point, again?
@@christophernichols114 much lower radar cross section., unlike white swan. They’ve been through hostile airspace often, unlike Tu 160 that launches from inside Russia.
@@redrust3 it flew over Florida while it was stationed in Venezuela
@@Ross72A references?
@@christophernichols114 be fr the b-1 lancer has the rcs of a f/a 18
Great plane.
that kinda looks like a B-1 Lancer but just in white
B-1 Lancer is the best USA3x!!!
No stay mad
Sure enough, the Tupolev Tu-160 (NATO reporting name: Blackjack) and the Rockwell International B-1 look quite similar at first glance,” Leone said in an op-ed. “Much has been said about the apparent Soviet custom of copying Western designs; this postulate is rooted in a firm conviction that Russia cannot produce anything worthwhile.”
Apparently that quote has a lot of reasoning behind it. Just look at all. The Russian superior equipment in Ukraine are getting blown up.
Still your astronauts are using russian Soyuz, the Russian are not that bad after all right ...
@@statk22 those days are over
@@whclcdrsource?
@@statk22 yes and that’s quite unfortunate because of some very shortsighted people at NASA. The reason given was to keep Russian scientist employed as we thought they would go to rogue nations and use their technology for nuclear weapons.
Looks like a mini Concord or Concord ski
that's how to showoff that you know no sh** about airplanes in 1 sentence. Congratulation.
Most people don't know about the Canadian Avro Arrow. All the Engineer went to designing the Concord and the Space Shuttle on 1961-62.
I don't like russia. But damn they make some awesome planes
Soviet Union made it. It took Russia 30 years to figure out how to make two more 🤣🤣
@@kkjoe1911why the laughings ?? Modern Russia is a pretty young country in the 90s they struggled a lot but yet 20 years later they managed to get back to the military and political scenes, impressive I'd say
Superior bomber 👍 🇷🇺 💪
Except it’s not. The North American XB-70 Valkyrie has a top speed of 2,056 mph. The US also has the only heavy stealth strategic bomber B-2 Spirit. And the largest strategic heavy bomber B-52 stratofortress. In fact the only 3 strategic bombers I know of are from the US. The B-1B Lancer, B-52 Stratofortress, and the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber. We have superior fighters as well.
In your dreams 🤣🤣
It's not exactly superior but a really good aircraft eitherways
Amazing and very incredible Stories.
SPEEEEEED AND POWAAAH!!!
B-1: "bruh"
Zelensky: a cruuse missile has landed on a building in kiev which i swear it wasnt being used for military purposes.
This mf: no way
Crashes well too
Source: my ass
@@Astra_Agnon source released by Russia was on a test flight ✈ no survivers 🤣 not long ago just after its refit 🤣
Just like every aircraft
Oh wow, 1 aircraft lost is your entire argument?
@@duanemarshall1889only 1 crash after years of service and you call it bad
How bout the f-35 that crashes every minute just cause it's so advanced that it even once turned into a sub in south China sea lol
That bomber is pretty nice except for all the chemicals it puts out even on the runways making the the ground crews sick with cancers😢😢
Who cares they have replacements and it takes years.
India: we’ll take your whole stock
They stay away from runway usually and wear suits nowadays. From what i know.
Bro we are talking about a bomber. The chemicals should be the least of your worries.
You funny
✨it’s giving✨b-1 lancer
that is huuuuge bigger than you think, im baffled see it flying above
Soviet engineering was badass back then.
It looks verry similar to concorde in terms of looks and performance
Hmmm