So strange to think that the most prominent descendants of these ancient men of the Eurasian steppes, are the Icelanders, a people living on a far off island on the frontier of Northern Europe. It's just fascinating that their most prominent descendants live so far away.
@@thegodofthegods1084 No one is Yamnaya, Yamnaya ancestry peaks in Armenians and Greeks at 15%. More or less all PIE derived populations are from Corded. It is possible When Corded Overran Yamnaya they adopted their language, or they spoke a shared language. But in terms of genetics, Yamnaya left very little legacy safe for a select for of West Asian and South Europeans. While Corded Ware ancestry is ubiquitous.
Hitler would be surprised Russians are more Aryan-colloquially put-than Germans, and Irish are one of the most Aryan people in Europe, along with their kin, the Viking Icelanders.
Because he believed in Germanic Aryan theory. Only blonde white people of Germanic heritage like western Europeans Dutch, English and other Anglo Saxon Germanic people were Aryans to him
Thank you for the nice video. Just should say that, being French, I notice that some of the photos of costumes don't quite match the area, e.g. there are Provençal costumes for the whole of France, and Breton costumes for Northern France. There are many types of costumes in France that differ very markedly from one small region to the next, and a French person can pick them straightaway.
These breakdowns need to be revised because back in 2016 they came up with these percentages using Yamnaya as the proxy for WSH ancestry. Yamnaya tends to be slightly shifted towards CHG/Iran neolithic, whereas corded ware tends to be more enriched in EHG. Using corded ware as the proxy for WSH will elevate the proportion of WSH ancestry in European populations, and will have lower estimates of WSH ancestry for western Asian/northern Indian populations.
And skin color is one of the smallest difference between races... If black full blooded african and white european would have same shape of skin color, you would easily notice the difference and europeans would still be the creators of 90% of all world inventions and achivement etc
In India we use the term Arya for Indo- Europeans. My contention has nothing to do with the claim of supiriority of Aryan race by Hitler and NAZI philosophy. The aryans were divided broadly into 4 categories namely 1 the ancestors of Russians 2 the Iranis the worshippers of AHURA, pronounced as ASURA s in ancient Indian Sanskrit and 3 the North Indians including the Punjabis Kashmiris etc..
@@arsh_arora10 In ancient time the contents of Vedas used to be passed on from generation to generation through listening and memorising. This is the reason Vedas are also known as SHRUTI. Alphabets and writing system evolved at a later stage.
Having met the Nuristani, and fought alongside a few; I have to say they are a pretty people, and can be quite open and hospitable when they aren't trying to kill you.
Kalash & Nuristanis don't have 40-50% yamnaya as shown in this video. Outdated & Inaccurate data. Maximum yamnaya in south asia does not go above 30% and its highest in Hindu Rors/Jaats of Haryana. Kalash & Nuristanis are more like 15-21% yamnaya(~20-30% sintashta).
@@smartcookie11 there were ancient times when Aryan tribes invaded India and introduced caste system there. It's about 2100 years BC, if I remember well.
@@Mishn0 Well, Aryan is actually an English word. 'Arya' is a Sanskrit word. Interesting fact: The word 'Iran' comes from the word 'Eran' which means Aryan.
Kalasha are not ethnically an sub-indian group. They are people from what is now the area of Balkan, which, according to most scholars, emigrated in today Nuristan during the military campaigns of Alexander the Great of Macedonia. Their commune ancestors can be find in some peoples of balcanic areas, mostly the albanians and greeks, then macedonians and to some extent to the bulgarians.
Central italians and especially Tuscans can peak to have more than 50% of R1B-U152 (Italo/celtic ancestry) and there is a haplogroup ( R1B-Z56) that is found almost only in central italy, related to proto-latins
Nice video! I make genetic videos as well, though, with a focus on Iran. May I know what calculator you used to calculate this ancestry. My calculations show that Iranian WSH ancestry ranges from 15 to 20% not 10 to 15%. Also, you forgot about the Yaghnobis and Pamiri Tajiks, and Tajiks in general. Also, some Caucasian and Turkic groups were also not covered here.
Finnish dna is so interesting they have the highest east eurasian and ANE ancestry in europe along with sámis but they also have one of the highest wsh ancestry
Our Finnish y-dna (male line( is mainly from Siberia (the non-european component) but mtdna (female line) is from continental Europe. In fact we have one of the biggest procentage of ancient European hunter-gatherers (first people in Europe).
So the big question gets to be, since hardly any of these groups are over 50% Proto-Indo-European, or Yamnaya, or whatever, what's the rest of their DNA? Pre-Indo-European, or later immigrants? Since the further northwest you go the more Indo they get, is most of the non-Indo later?
Mainly Pre-Indo-European, as far as I know. This goes for most Europeans, as well as eastern people like Iranians. For example, Iranians have lots of neolithic Iranian farmer ancestry. There's somewhat of a misconception that Iranians became "Arabized" at some point, but I haven't seen much evidence for this. It seems to me that Iranians just have a lot more Neolithic pre-indo-European ancestry than they do from Arab migrants.
I believe that the author of this video is an Irishman, the Irish are obsessed with proclaiming that they are very Indo-European, the most indo-european of all the indo-europeans on the planet . In my opinion the Indo-Europeans had the haplogroup R1a (=slavs) (not R1b). Also the "Nordics" are not actually all Indo-Europeans, there is a hypothesis that the initial Scandinavians were people similar to the Finns, who spoke a language related to Finnish, but at some point there was an invasion of Scandinavia by Indo-Europeans who came from the steppes of southern Russia and the Ukraine, invaders they called Scythians
@@messianic_scam the Indo-European word or adjective has no relationship with race (it does not indicate that they are white, yellow or black people, for example, or if those people have blonde hair or brown hair) but the "characteristics" of the language of a group of people have Indo-European is a language, it is not a human race, a language with certain similar characteristics. For example: the word "father" id called in indoeuropean languages something similar to "pater", the indo europeans languages also had a large number of words to refer to large livestock (horses and cows) but very few to refer to agriculture or fishing. That is to say: Indo-European does not indicate what kind of race a group of people has, but what kind of language a group of people has.
IE in Europe is associated with Yamnaya migrations, not Western Hunter Gatherer. According to the bulk of genetic evidence, which has accumulated in the past 10 years, and brought forth with the Max Plank Institute and independently from researchers like David Reich and Yosef Lazoridis, the Yamnaya themselves are 50% rooted in the original PIE populations that lived in the nexus between South Caucasus populations, including NW Iran, Armenia, and E. Turkey.
it was Sintashta culture with its R1a that spreaded I.E. language to the World ! not Yamnay which had R1b- which itself belongs to P.I.E. caicasian aborigians. R1b only later accepted I.E. language from R1a peoples. (Sintashta ).
Udmurts are the descendants of ice age Woolly Mammoth hunters. Red hair, blue eyes, Pheomelanin instead of Eumelanain. Also found in 'Celtic' Britain... Scotland Ireland and Wales. R1b.
@@mukhumor Udmurts have some east asian genes but almost two thirds of their genes are from the yamnaya , and they have the highest rate of red hair with Irish and Scots but the Mordvins especially the Erzya are the closest to yamnaya according to some studies
@@mukhumor Uralic people were from the European side and were close to indo Europeans they are not East Asian that’s not where the East Asian Dna comes from
@@famitsus987 Yes, Udmurts speak Uralic and have a high percentage of R1b. 'Nowadays in Russia R1b is found at higher frequencies among ethnic minorities of the Volga-Ural region (Udmurts, Komi, Mordvins, Tatars) than among Slavic...' There are ancient traces of Reindeer herders in Britain.
Western Eurasian Steppes people were the Yamnaya people of 3000 BCE. Descendants of these were the chariot people of Sintashta around 2000 BCE which is at the southern tip of Ural Mountains near the Russian & Kazakh borders. Later the descendants of Sintashta called Andronovo occupied a broader area east of Caspian Sea and south of Sintashta. These were the Aryans who went south to Iran and India around 1000 BCE.
There is argument that the Corded Ware Culture were not descendants of the Yamnaya but a seperate related tribe, thus making the Proto-Indo-Europeans the Sredny Stog culture. Either way how could you leave out the Corded Ware? The Sintashta are direct descendants of Corded Ware not the Yamnaya.
@@Quacklebush Yamnaya moved into Europe proper and mixed in with the Corded Ware. Then, that mixture came back east to the Fatyanovo-Balanovo culture and eventually to Sintashta. Sintashta with their expertise in domesticated horses, spoked-wheel chariots, archery and metallurgy drove them into contact with the great civilizations.
Yes I am quite aware of that but like I said the latest theory is that the Corded Ware was separate but yet also still related. Either way my point was how could you not mention the Corded Ware Culture? Corded Ware is by far the most important of the "WES", above Yamnaya and Sintashta.
@@Quacklebush I’m interested in reading more about Ancient DNA & Migrations after leaving Africa. I recently got these 3 books. Any others? * Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past by David Reich * Neanderthal Man: In Search of Lost Genomes by Svante Pääbo * The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World by David W. Anthony * Telling Humanity’s Story through DNA: Geneticist David Reich rewrites the ancient human past. | Harvard Magazine July-August 2022
Uh… these are more focused the current state of he people living in the countries than the genetic origins of the ethnic groups. For example the germanic and slavic ethnic groups normally have a closer relation the the indoeropeans while the scandanavian groups (although their ancestors have close geographic and distant ethnic relations to the indoeuropeans) are not infact descended directly from them. It’s also worth mentioning that the west turkic groups like the oghuz turks and avar turks are also descended from the indoeuropeans.
Scandinavians mostly descend from corded ware lineages. I1, R1b-U106 and R1a-Z284 are all found in corded ware groups and are not from native Scandinavia, Neolithic samples from Scandinavia mostly carry I2 not I1. I1 is probably from corded ware.
Isn't it kind of weird how the places that are closer to the central part of the Indo European homeland around the Black Sea Steppes and later Central Europe are less IE genetically today than others more on the periphery? I wonder how accurate it all is, or if the right reference populations are really being taken into account.
Yes, they moved throughout all that land, but then Levantines, Semites, Berbers, Arabs, Mongols, Turks, and general closeness to being in the "Middle" of every invasion that ever happened in the ancient world centered around the Fertile Crescent and Mediterranean that diluted the genes of the "closest" groups, while the more remote peoples retained the original "old" stock.
We don't know that for sure. The word Arya definitely meant noble or Freeman in yamnaya times. We don't know whether it got an ethnic meaning earlier than the Indo-iranian stage
You know we have a form of Aryaman in Celtic as Ariomanus? There are plenty of Arya cognates throughout Indo-European..it's definitely existed in Yamnaya times. The question is what were it's exact meanings during those times.
The word did develop out of the Indo-Iranian branch, and they were the first and only ones to use "Aryan" I don't know why people end up using it for all Indo-Europeans.
To save you time, with rough but accurate estimates based on appearance, history, archaeology, linguistics, etc. Baltic, excluding Estonia - 80-90% Poland/Slovakia - 80% Scandinavia - 70-80%, Iceland and other Nordic islands being around 60-70% Germanic areas + Czechia - 60% England - 50-60% depending area General Balkans - 40-55% East and North France/Belgium - 50-55% Ukraine, Belarus, Russia - 50-60% Italy - 35-40%, sometimes lower in the south Greece - 30-35% Celtic areas - 25-35% Ireland often smaller Iberian peninsula (excluding Basques) 30-45% depending area Rest of France - 30-50% Ossetia - 30-45% Afghanistan/Tajikistan - 30-45% Iran - 30--45% depending area Armenia - 30-35 Kurdistan - 15-20% Pakistan - 24-35%, sometimes higher or lower North India - 20-30% Brahmin often higher Take note that there are other areas with significant ancestry, but they often aren't of our groups.
How wonderfully mixed our continent is! BTW, notice no correlation between language family a given population speaks and their actual ancestry. That's what complicated history gives you.
@@flintb6559 Well, there are three European countries with non-Indo-European languages: Estonia, Finland, and Hungary (plus Basque country and Turkey). All three have more than 43% of WSW ancestry (the range is from ~5% to ~53%).
@@bazoo513 Finland estonia and turkey also have siberian ancestry. Finns on average have 10-15% east eurasian ancestry (automosally) yet haplowise Finnish males on average have %60 N1c haplogroup which originated in north china, these come from their uralic origins. Also u should note that uralic origin homeland wasnt so far away from indo-europeans. Proto-uralics were mainly neo-siberian and a little paleo-siberian(which contains ANE ancestry prob) but when some of them migrated west foward, they mixed with those who have wsh ancestry. Practically finns have both wsh and uralic ancestry. Funfact: Sami people also have one of the highest wsh ancestry in europe, but along with finns, they also have the highest east Eurasian ancestry. East Eurasian admixture among samis can go even up to %30. Coming to Turkish people, its quiete different. Turkish people on average have %10-20 east eurasian ancestry, and %20-30 medieval Turkic ancestry. And greeks and other middle easterners do not have east eurasian admixture at all lol. Even east eurasian ancestry among anatolian turks can go up to %20 in southwest regions due to yörüks(nomadic Turkish people) because in seljuk times they settled many turkmen soliders in west coasts especially bcz those areas were hardest to conquer. So, oghuz Turkic migrations mostly focused on western regions of Anatolia. Also turkish people do not really have any ancestry in very high amounts. As i said, Greeks and other europeans and other middle easterners do not have Eastern eurasian ancestry in those amounts(except for finns, samis, karelians etc etc) So it usually does correlate but ofc not always such as the best example are Hungarians. They barely have east eurasian admixture, even ukranians have higher east eurasian ancestry than them. (Note: turks were never compelelty east eurasian, even proto-turkics due to their paleo-siberian ancestry, which includes ANE ancestry and Ancients north eurasian ppl had both similae amounts of west eurasian and east eurasian
@@k1r4z. Thanks for additional fascinating details. But still, my observation that modern day cultural and linguistic heritage correlates pretty poorly with genetic heritage stands. We have so complicated history, with so many migrations, conquests, assimilations, empires growing and waning, that this is inevitable. One of the reasons I like good old Europe 😀
@@bazoo513 you're right but the point was theres theres a correlation even if its poorly but in some cases theres no correlation such as like hungarians since they lost their ob-ugric and turkic ancestry
@@stormtrooper8420 Umm average is the case for i guess for rest of the countries in North India average is 20% but Highest is 45% which is present in different communities.
Interesting how smaller populations and island populations, especially small island populations, would naturally express a higher coefficient of inbreeding skewing figures to a higher homogeneity, in this case WSH.
I don't think haplagroups are very accurate. We don't even know where Proto indo Europeans lived, let alone have genetic samples from them. They emmigrated to regions where there was already stablished populations with defined life styles and forced their language on rhem. So it must be low percentage in Europe(with higher population at the time of neolithic period) and higher in western Asia, not the other way.
Hello, as a Turkish from one of the 24 Seljuks tribes from today Antalya in Turkey I have 20 % Yamnaya, 12 % Iranian, 30% Anatolian 10% Caucasus Hunter Gatherer, the rest is non European, am I from the old Sogdians, indo Aryans or eastern Iranians ? Scythians ?
The origin of uralic and indo-europeans people arent way away lol. You have to add that, yes the proto-uralics were mainly neo-siberian but after proto-finno-ugrics moved west foward, they mixed with those who have high wsh ancestry so now thats why Finns now have the highest East Eurasian (due to their neo-siberian ancestry) in europe but they also have high wsh ancestry
Просматривается четкая зависимость от процентного наличия гаплогруппы R1a1 от направления на север и северо-восток. Однако должен заметить, что в Беларуси нет сейчас такого флага, какой был указан у вас в ролике! Когда-то был, но на референдуме в 1995г. от него отказались, так что не следует приписывать всем белорусам хотелки беглых националистов.
Yea solid number, I’m Macedonian ancestry, it interests me how you Scots have some similarities with us in regards to the bagpipes and the somewhat traditional costumes.
Yamnaya had R1b ydna but North Indians are R1a(~40-50%). So North Indians don't get IE from Yamnaya but earlier Aryan group because R1a is older than R1b. Also North Indians have the highest genetic diversity of R1a which supports them being the origin group for R1a. Also South Indians have the most R2a.
I don't think that is true about R1a diversity . That theory was based on very old data I believe. Much of Indian R1a is under Z93 which isn't that old relatively speaking . OIT is highly politicised unfortunately , and when you try and politicise science you are asking for trouble .
❤❤❤ 3:15 Sorry, Estonians were originally Finno-Ugric people and only over time mixed with the Baltic peoples and Slavs. 3:35 and the Finns are also a Finno-Ugric people, not Indo-European, then they also mixed somewhat with the peoples of the Swedes and Slavs...
These traditional outfits are not worn by most people, and give a totally false impression of the people in question. Most Germans don't wear what is shown as their traditional outfit, which is pretty much limited to Upper Bavaria and large parts of Austria.
@@masterjunky863 Look, I am Bavarian and have never worn outfits like that, and neither has the majority of Bavarians. What would a person from Chicago or Cleveland wear?
@@samreh6156 You should, don't let your culture and tradition die! I hope at least you can speak Bavarian (that is a language and not a dialect of German). However Americans have no tradition or ethnic culture, so they don't have a real traditional dress like us European ethnicities.
@@masterjunky863 You are a romantic. Of course, I speak Oberbayrisch, but not like my grandparents spoke, and, believe it or not, most people living in Bavaria don't speak it. They speak mostly standard German, Hochdeutsch, though their accent will probably tell you where they are from.
@@samreh6156 Yes, I'm indeed a romantic. I know most people there don't speak it, it's the same here in Lombardy (northern Italy), most of young people don't speak the Lombard language. It's really sad the way we are losing our tradition to be part of a shitty Americanized globalist world.
How about the Turkish people? The Turkish or Anatolians and Thracian people originally spoke an Indo European language which is the called the Anatolian languages which are a subgroup of the indo European language family.
ces pourcentages sont faux! L'haplogroupe R et sa sous-clade R1b (indo-européen ou Yamna) de la lignée Y, qui est devenu typique de l'européen depuis 3 à 4000 ans avant JC, est prédominant avec environ 50% en Allemagne, en Italie, en France, en Espagne et bien sûr plus encore en Grande Bretagne. C'est l'haplogroupe I le plus ancien d'Europe qui est dominant en Scandinavie, Balkans et Sardaigne
*nothwest india and even then its minorities there that have european features. As well as north pakistan and parts of afghanistan. Nursitanis, people of gilgit, some kashmiris, some pashtuns, some specific types of punjabis like Khatri punjabis(see Rohail Hyatt)
It is important that the Iranian people are Aryans with pride when the Mongol Turks produced the sound of wolf howls Achaemenid Darius called himself Aryan✌
I find it fascinating that the original Rig Veda Aryans for example were more genetically akin to those of the Nordic bronze age, and in turn modern Norwegians than they are to most modern Indians (e.g. Brahmins, maybe Haryana Jatts are an exception.)
@@bossschmutzfink9865 WSH were rich in ANE pedigree. Paleo Siberians, Jomon people, Plains Native Americans, WSHG much closer to them. ua-cam.com/video/zV5Wseu_aYg/v-deo.html
What about us Americans of random northern Europe ancestry? I'm thinking Minnesotans are going to be rather high with the upper peninsula of Michigan taking the cake. How would all that recombination affect the IE ancestry reading? For example I'm at least Swedish Norwegian Scottish English and German.
For example, the Nordics are made up of two ethnic groups and their mixtures, the Germanic and the Uralic. The Germanics are descendants of the Corded Ware culture of 4500 years ago, the Uralics are descendants of the Corded Ware and the Asians of the Ural Mountains, that is why the Samis or the Finns or the Ugriks speak languages of Asian origin and not Indo-Europeans, they carry their Asian Siberian and Indo-European genes. Phenotypically the Uralics are whiter than the Germanics themselves
I wont simplify the Indian part as simply Northern Indian. I think North West Indian (Punjab region, etc) people have higher percentage of WSH dna than the rest of India.
That video is obsolete whatsoever Indians whether northern or southern never go over 15-20%, only some really isolated groups but than again since they always have high ancestral Indian ancestry (over 30%) they're not racially Eurasian and can't even be compared to Pontic Caspian Steppe people who where fully Eurasian.
@@smartcookie11 Don't ask him, he'll spread misinformation. Muslims Jutts of Pakistan are 26% steppeMLBA on average, their AASI is 24-25%. Rest of their ancestry is IVC/BMAC. Sikh Jatts from Indian Punjab are 27-34% steppeMLBA usually, their AASI is 20-22%. Rest is IVC/BMAC. Hindu Jaats of Haryana/Delhi NCR are 32-40% steppeMLBA usually, their AASI is 17-21%. Rest is IVC/BMAC ancestry. And Hindu Rors of Haryana are 35-45% steppeMLBA usually, their AASI is 15-21%. Rest is IVC/BMAC. Kambojas who are spread in Haryana/Punjab/Himachal/Jammu/Chandigarh are 24-30% steppeMLBA and their AASI is 14-19%. Rest is BMAC/IVC. *****None of these above groups are higher castes. Historically, they have had either low caste status or have been just non-followers of caste system altogether. Brahmins with lesser steppe ancestry & much higher AASI ancestry are higher in caste status than these groups. This needs to be told to euro supremacists who love to associate higher caste status with steppe.****** Khatris who are spread in Punjab/Haryana/Delhi NCR/Himachal/Jammu are 25% steppeMLBA on average, 20% AASI. Rest of their ancestry being BMAC/IVC. Those Bollywood families with last names like Kapoor/Khanna are khatris. Look up celebs like Twinkle Khanna, Kareena Kapoor, Ranbir Kapoor, Shanaya Kapoor for context. AND NO, they're not the whitest *liGhtEst bRighTeSt rAre* Indians as many people like to spread this wrong narrative. They are just SUB-GROUPS of khatris from North who were successful in setting up their families while founding Bollywood in Mumbai. Plenty of even lighter Indians than them exist in above Delhi region of India. For reference... Kalash of Chitral Valley in Pakistan, who follow some form of ancient hinduism, are 25-30% steppeMLBA, their AASI is 0-10%. Rest is BMAC/IVC.
@@jmab721 wow thanks for the insight, this really surprised me how Jatts is Pakistan have less WSH DNA than people in haryana, since it falls more further south. Hard to believe that the Rors could have as much WSH as Germans, which is 45 percent WSH i believe.
@@smartcookie11 No, notice that I mentioned MLBA, and not EMBA. WSH is steppeEMBA. It is the MLBA ancestry from which we have to calculate WSH among south asians/central asians/Iranians. 70% of this MLBA is WSH. Which means that Rors are maximum 31% WSH, and not higher than that. And usually hindu Jaats/Rors of Haryana 25-30% WSH. Maximum yamnaya(WSH) is taken as 30% for south asia. That's the maximum limit. Northern Europeans are 40-50% of this same WSH ancestry. The decreasing importance of endogamy can be a factor as to why hindu jaats of Delhi/Haryana region are most steppe, then it is sikh jatts of Indian punjab, and then least of these 3 are muslim jutts of Pak Punjab.
I seriously doubt Northern Indians are 20-30 percent *western* steppe herder (e.g. Yamnaya). They could be 20-30% *central* steppe herder (e.g. Sintashta) however. That's something I see everywhere, people talking about steppe ancestry and mixing up steppe EMBA & steppe MLBA (which is only 60% steppe EMBA). 12-18% WSH should be closer to reality. I haven't watched the rest of the video but I assume you made the same mistake for the other Asian populations.
he did make that mistake and kind of corrected it in a later video. south asians barely have any steppe dna left because the regions were already populated, even the brahmins have lower steppe dna than southern europeans.
@@Shivansh-rr7bcThat is Sintashta. Brahmins have around ~20% Steppe DNA just like the average N. Indian, while Jats have ~25% and rors have around 28%. The only significant Yamnaya steppe ancestry population in India is of Jats and Rors, not even Kalash have as much. But by traditional original definition N. India is the most Aryan, since it describes the Vedic people.
Not really there are Indians and iranic people with more WSH than some european groups. This video didnt include Pashtuns and nuristani people in south asia
Fun fact, most white Americans, Canadians, and Australians and Kiwis have more WSH DNA than most southern Europeans. The Yamnaya heritage went worldwide genetically, culturally, linguistically.
The Indo-Europeans nicknamed Yamnaya expand 6000 years ago in two directions, one towards Asia and the other towards Asia, their expansion in Europe was much more successful, however the continent was not empty since it was inhabited by the ancient populations of Europe of Haplogroup I, The Indo-Europeans displaced or replaced the Western European I2 lineages, Southern Europeans like the Balkans have large amounts of DNA from these ancient Europeans, and the Sardinians in Italy are the only pure I2 haplogroup, their DNA is the same as the Neolithic, the Iberians have 30% Indo-European European Yamnaya, we must not forget that the Asians also have Indo-European DNA like the Iranians and North India and North Pakistan
An amateur vahaduo model is the source which is also false and poorly made. For example swedes do not have 45% while danes and norwegians have 50%. The indians and kalash people do not have 30-50% yamnaya ancestry. They only have 5-20% european hunter gatherer genes. Yamnaya had 66% and scandinavians like swedes 50%. They are geting false positives from a separate CHG source in the yamnaya genome. The sources mentioned has nothing to do with the amateur picture linked.
Aryans were only the ancient indo-Iranian sub group of indo Europeans. You’re spreading misinformation by designating the entire indo-European people as Aryan
They originated in Eastern Europe whose one branch went to India via Central Asia and mixed with IVC women who were darker in looks but caucasian in looks due to Neolithic Iran dna .
@@JonOmega-mf4dm The ancestral matrix of Haplogroup R originates in Central Asia, migrates to the Altai giving rise to the mal'ta buret culture, this human group spreads through Central Asia and the Americas, reaches India and eastern Europe, from eastern Europe the Proto-Indo-Europeans originate
@@JonOmega-mf4dm Yes, Indians and Europeans share DNA with the Ancient North Eurasian an ancient form of Siberian, later East-Central Asian European DNA was inherited by Indians, but Europeans did not inherit DNA from the Indian subcontinent
Mother of all languages is Proto Serbian and I can prove it. Do you know that wild Greeks came to Pelasgian land and found culture and proto Serbian language and they just mixed with Pelasgian people and learned everything there? Here are just some examples. You can see first word is Serbian, second word is Greek and third word is German (Serbian, Greek and German) (ili-Alla-aber) (utočište- eutoichiste- Zuflucht) (blizu-pljsion-nahe) (breme- brjme- Gewicht) (koliba- kalyba- Hütte) (hod- hod-Gang) (Tece voda protiv vode-Teke wudas proti wudei-Es fliest Wasser gegen Wasser) (činim- xinjm- ich thue) (daleko- tale ko- entfernt) (dar-dar- Geschenk) (danak- danj- Abgabe) (delim- dieljm- ich teile) (Dever- dawer- Schwager) (trljam- tribo- ich reibe) (dom- dom- zu hause) (drzim- drassjm- ich halte) (duplo- diploo- verdoppele) (dva- dwo-zwei) (idu- ithuo- ich gehe) (jedan- jadon- eine) (grebu- grabo- kratzen) (kakim- kakam- ich scheiße) (klizam- kluzam- ich gleite) (glina- gli- klei) (kljuc- kljs- Schlüssel) (komora- kamara- kammer) (kanim- koinam- ich thue) (Koliko- kelikos-wieviel) (Kos- kossyf- Amsel) (klisura- klision- Schlucht) (kobila- kaballes-Stutte) (kokot- kokkos-Hahn) (leto- leto-jahr) (levo- laevos-linke) (mak- mak-Mohn) (manje- mjon-weniger) (mama-mamma- Mutter) (muva- muia- Fliege) (meljem- mullem- ich mahle) (merim- meirjm- ich messe) (mesec- meis- Mond) (magla-omichla- Nebel) (nosim-nisso-ich trage) (oko- oko- Auge) (orem- arom-ich ackere) (palica-pelekys-Keule) (put-pat-Weg) (pecem-peso-ich brate) (pero-ptero-Feder) (pijem- pjm-ich trinke) (pivo- pino- Bier) Sanskrit is made-up from Proto Serbian and are the same languages. Here some samples Sanskrit-Serbian-English: (bele-belo-white) (ghughu-gugutka-turtle dove) (dub-dubok-deep) (kaši-kašalj-cough) (kaste-kosa-sickle) (Mata-Mati-Mother) (madhu-med-honey) (majh-medja-boundary) (meša-mešati-to mix) (thunko-tanko-thin) (mara-umreti-to die) (baba-babo-father) (balak-balavac-immature person) (beg-beg-flight) (bedana-beda-grif) (bhrata-brat-brother) (churi-cura-girl) (Gra-Grad-Town) (Lod-Lud-Crazy) (Ljubhva-Ljubav-Love) (Deti-Dete-Child) (Smajase-Smeje se-Lahghing) (Sladu-Slatki-Sweet) (Kadajati-Kidati-Tear) (Suri-Svetli-Bright) (Mač-Mač-Sword) (Bhaga-Bog-God) (Nava-Novi-New) (Moru-Mora-Nightmare) (Čamarika-Čemerika-Hellebore) (Sobha-Soba-Room) (Krsti-Krst-Cross) (Tama-Tama-Dark) (Zvana-Zvono-Bell) (Dina-Dan-Day) (Apat-Patnja-Suffering) (Itvara-Utvara-Spook) (Inoti-Inatiti-Spite) (Učjati-Uciti-Learn) (Uda-Voda-Water) (Košah-Koža-Skin) (Kapalam-Kapa-Cap) (Kabila-Kobila-Mare) Please note additional reference Book from Alokananda Mitter Calcuta India, Similarities between Bengali and Sanskrit and Serbian.
@@Veritas-dq2hs There is no such thing as a "genetic isolate" as all (living) humans come from mitochondrial eve and y chromosome adam. Just some groups share more recent genetic material from others. Specific haplogroups associated with the Yamnaya are R1a and R1b. This is evidence by the fact that R1a is found both in Eastern Europe and among Northern Indian Brahmins. I'm not sure about how material Yamnaya genes, but it appears people who lived far away from the original homeland of the Yamnaya (Western Europeans, Indians) have very little Yamnaya maternal genes while those who lived close to the Yamnaya homeland (eastern europeans and Iranians) have more Yamnaya maternal genes. However, it is important to realize that research into the Yamnaya / steppe culture is only a few decades old (a very short time from a scientific perspective), and theories about IE origin will likely change in the future as technology gets better and we have more data.
Well, the author may not know what the flag of Belarus looks like... but it turns out that the "British scientists" together do not know what the flag looks like. The British sciences apparently do not yet know that Fins belong to the Finougorian language family, etc.But then it is not surprising that the islanders are the main Proto-Indo-Europeans... lmao.
I think there should have been a distinction between north and south germany, seeing how dutch people are far more genetically distinguished from (probably southern) germans in this video
Das Ding ist, dass wir Deutschen ein sehr vielfältiges Volk sind. Wir haben allein schon wegen der Hansezeit so viel unterschiedliches Blut in uns, wie zum Beispiel aus Skandinavien oder Holland. Aber auch aus anderen Nachbarländern. Bei uns kommt es tatsächlich drauf an
Why are the same Y haplos quite equally present in western Europe,Niklas are you refering about the autosomal dna?Dont forget the most germans who fled WW2 "back to Reich " have setlled in southern Germany.The royal subclade of R1b DF 96 I think from the House of Wettin is almost present in modern Royalties across Europe.People,genes dont have "culture",there are not tipically for a culture or borders of modern countries,as we see p.e. the genes of the Hungarians,which are in modern times everything but no finougric.
@roberto lang The bavarians,suabian or the allemans?Hallstat and La tene are the same culture in distinct time stamps and locations,yes there are relicts of massive celtic presence in southern modern Germany below the chatii region,today Hessen,but dont forget the antic Bajuvaroz,the Markomanii,Francs and so on which assimilated the romanized celts of the region.
The language is not. Have you ever seen a Finn? Researches tell Finland has got percentually most blondies in the world. Watch the video "Which country has the most blondies?" The answer is Finland.
@@jukkahelisjoki5820 YAMANAYAS WERE NOT FULLY BLONDE. FIRST THEY MOSTLY WERE DARK HAIRED . BUT FINISH AND EUROPEANS IN GENERAL MIGHT HAVE GOT IT FROM NATIVE EUROPEAN HUNTER GATHERERS OR MUTATION IN GENES. AGAIN. ALSO THEIR PERCENTAGE OF STEPPE IS LOW. I FEEL GERMANS MADE A MESS OF STEPPE AND MAKE INTO EUROPEAN WHEN IT'S PART OF EUROPEAN ANCESTORY BUT NOT FULLY EUROPEAN. SOME BRAHMINS HAVE BLONDE HAIR AND THE WAY THEY ARE ENDO-GAMOUS IT COULD MEAN THAT YAMNAYAS MAY HAVE IT BUT NOT IN LARGE QUANTITY U DEFINITELY GOT IT FROM UR NATIVE ANCESTORS
And do let us know how you came to piece together the mapping of genetics to ethnicity and linguistics?! What is your standard for "Aryan" heritage for comparison with each sub-groups, especially when the whole steppe theory has been proved incorrect or atleast incomplete and the Aryan Invasion/Migration theory into India has been long debunked!
aryan invasion theory makes sense bro my mom with family from punjab and kashmir looks hella ambiguous, she's been confused for different ethnicities. The further north you go in pakistan and into afghanistan as well, the more drastically different people look from the rest of the people in the "indian/south asian subcontinent". That's the most plausible reason. You can't just say its the weather difference.
@@supermavro6072 albanians, turks and slavs have quite different faces compared to greeks. Maybe are you the one thats quite mixed? The vast majority of greek population looks distinct compared to the others you mentioned.
What about Gilgit Baltistanis, and the ethnic groups next to the Kalash, since they would pick up admixtures from them, so would have a higher component.
What haplogroups were taken into account? Mithocondrial ADN or haplogroups of the chromosome and human? Because nordic people is population with more amount haplogrouos pre-indoerupean more especific haplogroup I like balkaniks and Sardinian
There are only 2 sex chromosome X and Y so called haplos ,female and male,the females have only mT X inherited from the nanas,mums anf daughters and so on,and the Y inherited form the male line also grandpa,father to sons and so on.Females have ever XX and the males XY.The thing whith chromosome and human is only rubbish, you where thinking of course to the autosomal DNA of the other 23 chromosomes which is incompletely used to define from where you are.
Results look believable (showing direct correlation with distribution of so-called "Nordic" phenotype) EXCEPT for Indians and Nurestanis/Kalash where they are absurdly high. Later areas were densely inhabited by superior cultures before Aryans came, so latter influence was merely cultural/linguistic but CLEARLY not genetic as phenotypes evidently show
In reality, the phenotype does not correspond to the genetic load but rather to the number of dominant genes, the WSH genes are very receptive, so they are easily diluted and disappear, a large part of the European Phenotype corresponds to the CGH Caucasus Gatherer Hunters, the average White European phenotype is a mixture of the WSH and HCG Phenotype, we know from genetic studies that people from North India and Pakistan have a high genetic load of WSH similar to Southern Europeans however the type of mixture is different, because in Europe the mixture is WSH (Western Steppe Herder) with GCH, in South Asia the mixture is WSH with hunter gatherers from South Asia
Another way to see it is by Haplotypes that tell us which human lineages they belong to, Europeans have Haplotypes R1a, R1b, I and J2, people from India have Haplotypes H, J2, L, R1a and R2, people from India they share two lineages with Europeans and a third lineage that is closely related to Europeans which is R2
Indians are not a race. This video only mentions North Indians. Indians are multi racial. There are Caucasians, East Asians, Australoids and even a very tiny amount of African people who number only a few thousands
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d I don't think so... The minority of Indians that do not show hunter gatherer influence in phenotype (Veddoid) are almost indistinguishable from Iranians. Dravidians show the same pattern although Veddoid admixture is almost always present there. The only Indian ethnic groups where Aryan phenotype is even possible are "Dards" (eg: Kalash). Modern South Asians are largely a mixture of Iranian settlers that came during neolithic and mesolithic inhabitants (called "Veddoid" by anthropologists) present there for tens of thousands of years (Veddas or Irulas are best representatives today, but most are obviously mixed too). Demographically it is impossible for Aryans to have left much of an influence in Indus valley, which hosted a great urban civilization before. Personally I also find it exaggerated among Northern Europeans also. In terms of phenotype, only a minority carry influences from invaders' phenotypes: 80%+ of Europeans look like mixtures between Neolithic settlers and mesolithic natives (among Indians even more).
@@lucianpopescu3896 Racial classifications by phenotype are broadly very useful but they do not tell us everything, genetics is a much more precise classification and gives us a much more complex and mixed reality between the different human groups, the genotype is not the same as the phenotype In general, dominant genes manifest in the phenotype and recessive genes do not manifest, for recessive genes to manifest they must have several copies or not possess the dominant gene. Humans with the most recessive genes are those that have undergone inbreeding, humans with the most recessive genes are East Asians, followed by Europeans and the Middle East, and humans with the most dominant genes are Sub-Saharan Africans
You are correct and There is Sintashta video which says they were R1b R1a and Q and most genetically similar to Irish and Baltic people also Indians Slavic people have bottlenecks that’s why they are mostly R1a ancient Iranians had Q and R1b not just R1a also corded ware Yamnaya Iranians Indoeuropeans were all related
What's the source of these result? After 5000 years later is it possible some people to carry %50 of their genetics from people who died 5000 years later?
Не показывайте это видео украинцам, которые любят утверждать, что русские - это помесь монголов с финнами. Хотя индоевропейских генов у финнов и русских даже больше
The Finns are among the humans with the most Indo-European DNA from the steppes but also among those with the most North Asian Siberian DNA, which is in contrast to much of Europe, the Finns are definitely very interesting.
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d Proto-European peoples migrated from Siberia to Europe...all Europeans look like Asians in infancy, but during the period of growing up, Asian facial features change to European ones...
@@start3215 The Proto-Europeans lived in Asia, but they had no DNA of modern East Asia. The ANE are 75%-80% Western Eurasian and 20%-25% Basal Eurasian, but the Basal Eurasians were more similar to the Australomelanesians (Onge, Aeta, Indigenous Australians, Melanesians, Indigenous Australians), they did not resemble the typical Asians we know. On the other hand, European Babies have greater facial projection, simply because at a younger age they have greater neotemia, Asians are born with flatter faces than babies, so they are different from Europeans and better preserve their neotemia. Most Europeans have no East Asian mixture, only Europeans of Finn-Ugric ancestry, such as Finns, Northern Sweden, Karelian Russians, etc.
Thanks to genetics we know that the first modern humans were dark-skinned and that for a very long time,light-skinned humans evolved much later in the Pontic steppe.
It depends about the calculation method the so called algorhytm and of course of the number of datas from the people and the most datas revealed are from the "white indo aryans" also another big gap to fulfill,100x1k datas in comparison whith the few datas in your zone.
Looks like we're one big family and shouldn't fight eachother. Even Russians and Ukranians share almost 50% of their DNA. Yoint effords would result in much more prosperity for everyone than the destruction that only one disgusting war criminal started.
I am aware that this video is not a credible source of information. However, I was surprised of not finding Pashtuns in the list. Pashtuns- who speaks the most ancient Indo-European language that still exists, Pashto. Who gave words Arya, India and according to many historian 'Ester' to the world. Their homeland between River Oxus and River Indus had been called Aryana until very recent.
Arya word is not derived from Pashtuns. Sanskrit scholars called themselves Aryans before anyone else did. Only Iran and Indian subcontinent people called themselves Aryans first
@@shreyaskumarrath721 Sanskrit language came very late to existence. Pashtuns are cateogrized into Indo-Iranian group while Pashto language is considered the oldest among them that is still spoken.
As a swede i have heard that there came folk from around where Turkey is now and settled in Scandinavia. I think they lived by farming. Is this correct?
Yes, the modern European population descends from three clearly differentiated ancestral human groups, the ancient populations of Europe from the Mesolithic (10,000-5,000 years), the Farmers of Anatolia (Turkey) from the Neolithic (6,000-4,000 years) and the Indo-Europeans. of the Neolithic who lived in what are the Russian steppes. The Indo-Europeans and the Anatolian Farmers entered the interior of Europe and mixed with the ancient Mesolithic hunter gatherers who already lived there.
The Indo-Europeans expand from the Russian steppes and bring the Indo-European languages to Europe, South Asia and in western China with the Tocharians, North India have Indo-European DNA and speak languages of the Indo-European family, parts of Pakistan and also Iran, in fact the Brahmins in India claim to be descended from them. The Tocarians become extinct with the expansion of the Asian Turks, these are known as the white mummies in China
Imagine how much more beautiful our world would be if we all just dressed in folk dress.
I'm really disappointed haw they depicted us English
You're fucking right
@@elwolf8536 why? he looked like a chad
@Jago Sevatarion haha 😄 thats a public school uniform realy our traditional dress is far more chad
@@elwolf8536 i'm talking abt his facial features and expression
Finally, a video that did not miss out kalash people, who are living in a culture that is probably most closest to how IE lived
So strange to think that the most prominent descendants of these ancient men of the Eurasian steppes, are the Icelanders, a people living on a far off island on the frontier of Northern Europe. It's just fascinating that their most prominent descendants live so far away.
yeah because no one was living there before the icelanders
No, not Icelanders.
ua-cam.com/video/zV5Wseu_aYg/v-deo.html
Yeah no one was living there before aryan settlers so their blood remained pure
@@l5475 and becuase then they remain isolated and no other group across to mix up with them
@@lucianpopescu3896 mesolithic natives are aryans
As someone of fully Northern European heritage, I feel quite interested in the Yamnaya people, given that they are my most significant ancestors.
Me too, 100% British according to my DNA test. It definitely strengthens my interest too.
Urra? Ura ura ura. Urra UrRa Ura.
@Joe Bloggs So like who's Yamnaya? Iranians and Indians?
@@thegodofthegods1084 No one is Yamnaya, Yamnaya ancestry peaks in Armenians and Greeks at 15%. More or less all PIE derived populations are from Corded. It is possible When Corded Overran Yamnaya they adopted their language, or they spoke a shared language. But in terms of genetics, Yamnaya left very little legacy safe for a select for of West Asian and South Europeans. While Corded Ware ancestry is ubiquitous.
@@joepetto9488 Corded Ware is Yamnaya; it's the culture that formed from the westward spread of Steppe Herders.
Hitler would be surprised Russians are more Aryan-colloquially put-than Germans, and Irish are one of the most Aryan people in Europe, along with their kin, the Viking Icelanders.
Lmao what
No he wouldn’t he called them Aryan
Because he believed in Germanic Aryan theory. Only blonde white people of Germanic heritage like western Europeans Dutch, English and other Anglo Saxon Germanic people were Aryans to him
How are slavic people more Aryans if the Iranic and Indo-Aryan Sub branches used that term.
None of them are Aryan. Aryan is Ria Z94
Thank you for the nice video. Just should say that, being French, I notice that some of the photos of costumes don't quite match the area, e.g. there are Provençal costumes for the whole of France, and Breton costumes for Northern France. There are many types of costumes in France that differ very markedly from one small region to the next, and a French person can pick them straightaway.
This video is totally wrong about the percentage of Indo-European ancestors.
These breakdowns need to be revised because back in 2016 they came up with these percentages using Yamnaya as the proxy for WSH ancestry. Yamnaya tends to be slightly shifted towards CHG/Iran neolithic, whereas corded ware tends to be more enriched in EHG. Using corded ware as the proxy for WSH will elevate the proportion of WSH ancestry in European populations, and will have lower estimates of WSH ancestry for western Asian/northern Indian populations.
WSH,CHG,EHG full form please
@@joohimurmu1585 WSH - Western Steppe Herders,
CHG - Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers,
WHG - Western (European) Hunter-Gatherers,
EHG- Eastern (European) Hunter-Gatherers.
Nah, I know the map it’s based on. It includes early Corded ware as WSH.
@@joohimurmu1585 western stepp herders, western Hunter gatherers, eastern hunter gatherers, central hunter gatherers
@@sophitsa79 CHG Caucasus Hunter Gatherers
Beautiful pictures in regional traditional clothes
Another important thing to be noted is that Skin colour isn't totally based on Genes but also on Exposure to sun.
And skin color is one of the smallest difference between races... If black full blooded african and white european would have same shape of skin color, you would easily notice the difference and europeans would still be the creators of 90% of all world inventions and achivement etc
Ofcourse due to melanin
@@dustybawls7085 That's not what I meant. I meant that Melanin secretion depends upon both Exposure and Background.
@@eshaansarkar2017 kk
@roberto lang Salt and water? What do you mean?
In India we use the term Arya for Indo- Europeans. My contention has nothing to do with the claim of supiriority of Aryan race by Hitler and NAZI philosophy. The aryans were divided broadly into 4 categories namely 1 the ancestors of Russians 2 the Iranis the worshippers of AHURA, pronounced as ASURA s in ancient Indian Sanskrit and 3 the North Indians including the Punjabis Kashmiris etc..
Aryas claimed in RigVed that Vedik knowledge is being transferred orally and first founders of it were SaptRishis
Am I correct
@@arsh_arora10 In ancient time the contents of Vedas used to be passed on from generation to generation through listening and memorising. This is the reason Vedas are also known as SHRUTI. Alphabets and writing system evolved at a later stage.
Having met the Nuristani, and fought alongside a few; I have to say they are a pretty people, and can be quite open and hospitable when they aren't trying to kill you.
😂😅
Kalash & Nuristanis don't have 40-50% yamnaya as shown in this video. Outdated & Inaccurate data. Maximum yamnaya in south asia does not go above 30% and its highest in Hindu Rors/Jaats of Haryana. Kalash & Nuristanis are more like 15-21% yamnaya(~20-30% sintashta).
@@jmab721 cope
@@famitsus987 Writing correct data is not called coping. Dummy
@@famitsus987 lol weirdo thought it was a competition as to who has more yamnaya
Hmm... what about Kurds - 60%, Tajik people - 69% and, especially, Bramin caste of India - 96,6% of Aryan ancestry.
which nation are you from
@@smartcookie11 I am Ukrainian with Polish and German ancestry ✌😉🇺🇦
@@igorvoloshin3406 nice to see u have rich Aryan ancestry, but why do u say that brahmins are 96 percent Aryans, since Aryans originate in eurasia 🤔
@@smartcookie11 there were ancient times when Aryan tribes invaded India and introduced caste system there. It's about 2100 years BC, if I remember well.
@@igorvoloshin3406 but then how are they 96.6 percent ????
Beautiful european brothers and sisters. Greetings from Germany!
Where are the Armenians? Even any Caucasian has more Indo-European blood than Armenians.
An Indian subcontinental group, 'Kalash' have more PIE genes than English. It's really surprising.
Since Aryan is a Sanskrit name for the PIE people, it shouldn't be surprising.
@@Mishn0 Well, Aryan is actually an English word. 'Arya' is a Sanskrit word. Interesting fact: The word 'Iran' comes from the word 'Eran' which means Aryan.
@@eshaansarkar2017 OK, "comes from" not "is". That doesn't change my point. Thank you for the pedantic clarification.
Kalasha are not ethnically an sub-indian group. They are people from what is now the area of Balkan, which, according to most scholars, emigrated in today Nuristan during the military campaigns of Alexander the Great of Macedonia. Their commune ancestors can be find in some peoples of balcanic areas, mostly the albanians and greeks, then macedonians and to some extent to the bulgarians.
@@arjandino9106 No they are local people
Central italians and especially Tuscans can peak to have more than 50% of R1B-U152 (Italo/celtic ancestry) and there is a haplogroup ( R1B-Z56) that is found almost only in central italy, related to proto-latins
Nice video! I make genetic videos as well, though, with a focus on Iran. May I know what calculator you used to calculate this ancestry. My calculations show that Iranian WSH ancestry ranges from 15 to 20% not 10 to 15%. Also, you forgot about the Yaghnobis and Pamiri Tajiks, and Tajiks in general. Also, some Caucasian and Turkic groups were also not covered here.
Yeah, and I accidentally left out Bosnia as well lol. I'm thinking about doing a follow-up video in the near future.
@@SonOfManu Thanks.
Yeah Turkish, Uzbek, Kurds, Ossetians etc, many other groups I would like to see in the comparison!
What about pushtoons
@@Kingkhan123-v6o Pashtuns are Taliban, not people
Finnish dna is so interesting they have the highest east eurasian and ANE ancestry in europe along with sámis but they also have one of the highest wsh ancestry
Our Finnish y-dna (male line( is mainly from Siberia (the non-european component) but mtdna (female line) is from continental Europe. In fact we have one of the biggest procentage of ancient European hunter-gatherers (first people in Europe).
@@mikajokela1899 you didnt get my point loll
Doesn't tell me why Finnish are alcoholics. Without that dna they wouldn't be such childish losers.
@@tpilot_error404 what
Indo-Europeans themselves has 50% ANE dna, ANE would have looked somewhat european.
So the big question gets to be, since hardly any of these groups are over 50% Proto-Indo-European, or Yamnaya, or whatever, what's the rest of their DNA? Pre-Indo-European, or later immigrants? Since the further northwest you go the more Indo they get, is most of the non-Indo later?
1.WHG, EHG
2.EEF
3.WSH
Mainly Pre-Indo-European, as far as I know. This goes for most Europeans, as well as eastern people like Iranians. For example, Iranians have lots of neolithic Iranian farmer ancestry. There's somewhat of a misconception that Iranians became "Arabized" at some point, but I haven't seen much evidence for this. It seems to me that Iranians just have a lot more Neolithic pre-indo-European ancestry than they do from Arab migrants.
I believe that the author of this video is an Irishman, the Irish are obsessed with proclaiming that they are very Indo-European, the most indo-european of all the indo-europeans on the planet . In my opinion the Indo-Europeans had the haplogroup R1a (=slavs) (not R1b). Also the "Nordics" are not actually all Indo-Europeans, there is a hypothesis that the initial Scandinavians were people similar to the Finns, who spoke a language related to Finnish, but at some point there was an invasion of Scandinavia by Indo-Europeans who came from the steppes of southern Russia and the Ukraine, invaders they called Scythians
@@TheMariepi3
what is indo uropean any way ?! no such thing indo means from the indian continent, Scandinavians are not of the indian continent
@@messianic_scam the Indo-European word or adjective has no relationship with race (it does not indicate that they are white, yellow or black people, for example, or if those people have blonde hair or brown hair) but the "characteristics" of the language of a group of people have
Indo-European is a language, it is not a human race, a language with certain similar characteristics. For example: the word "father" id called in indoeuropean languages something similar to "pater", the indo europeans languages also had a large number of words to refer to large livestock (horses and cows) but very few to refer to agriculture or fishing. That is to say: Indo-European does not indicate what kind of race a group of people has, but what kind of language a group of people has.
Very important subject to bring focus to, thanks!
IE in Europe is associated with Yamnaya migrations, not Western Hunter Gatherer. According to the bulk of genetic evidence, which has accumulated in the past 10 years, and brought forth with the Max Plank Institute and independently from researchers like David Reich and Yosef Lazoridis, the Yamnaya themselves are 50% rooted in the original PIE populations that lived in the nexus between South Caucasus populations, including NW Iran, Armenia, and E. Turkey.
Yo. TURKEY Caucasian DNA.
That says western steppe herder
Caucasians are actually Turkic Mongoloid, they're nothing like you imagined.
Not 50. More like 35 and the initial Indo European Speakers were likely of EHG stock.
it was Sintashta culture with its R1a that spreaded I.E. language to the World ! not Yamnay which had R1b- which itself belongs to P.I.E. caicasian aborigians. R1b only later accepted I.E. language from R1a peoples. (Sintashta ).
The folk dress of the European people is so beautiful
Slàinte mhath from Scotland
some ethnic groups in Russia are the closest to Yamnaya , like Mordvins and Udmurts
Udmurts are the descendants of ice age Woolly Mammoth hunters. Red hair, blue eyes, Pheomelanin instead of Eumelanain. Also found in 'Celtic' Britain... Scotland Ireland and Wales. R1b.
@@mukhumor Udmurts have some east asian genes but almost two thirds of their genes are from the yamnaya , and they have the highest rate of red hair with Irish and Scots
but the Mordvins especially the Erzya are the closest to yamnaya according to some studies
@@krimokrimov6050 Yes. There is likely to be some Uralic admixture in Udmurts.
@@mukhumor Uralic people were from the European side and were close to indo Europeans they are not East Asian that’s not where the East Asian Dna comes from
@@famitsus987 Yes, Udmurts speak Uralic and have a high percentage of R1b. 'Nowadays in Russia R1b is found at higher frequencies among ethnic minorities of the Volga-Ural region (Udmurts, Komi, Mordvins, Tatars) than among Slavic...' There are ancient traces of Reindeer herders in Britain.
Armenians,Kurds,Zaza and Talish people are also indo-European race and language group of people,why weren't they included here?..
Thank you Dursun 🌺
Also Tajiks
Because you’re heavily mixed with distant peoples.
@@Phoenician_kang you are in dream
Except for Armenia, the rest are people, but they don't have a country, and they won't have one
Western Eurasian Steppes people were the Yamnaya people of 3000 BCE. Descendants of these were the chariot people of Sintashta around 2000 BCE which is at the southern tip of Ural Mountains near the Russian & Kazakh borders. Later the descendants of Sintashta called Andronovo occupied a broader area east of Caspian Sea and south of Sintashta. These were the Aryans who went south to Iran and India around 1000 BCE.
There is argument that the Corded Ware Culture were not descendants of the Yamnaya but a seperate related tribe, thus making the Proto-Indo-Europeans the Sredny Stog culture. Either way how could you leave out the Corded Ware? The Sintashta are direct descendants of Corded Ware not the Yamnaya.
@@Quacklebush Yamnaya moved into Europe proper and mixed in with the Corded Ware. Then, that mixture came back east to the Fatyanovo-Balanovo culture and eventually to Sintashta. Sintashta with their expertise in domesticated horses, spoked-wheel chariots, archery and metallurgy drove them into contact with the great civilizations.
Yes I am quite aware of that but like I said the latest theory is that the Corded Ware was separate but yet also still related. Either way my point was how could you not mention the Corded Ware Culture? Corded Ware is by far the most important of the "WES", above Yamnaya and Sintashta.
@@Quacklebush I’m interested in reading more about Ancient DNA & Migrations after leaving Africa. I recently got these 3 books. Any others?
* Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past by David Reich
* Neanderthal Man: In Search of Lost Genomes by Svante Pääbo
* The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World by David W. Anthony
* Telling Humanity’s Story through DNA: Geneticist David Reich rewrites the ancient human past. | Harvard Magazine July-August 2022
@@RamZar50 ua-cam.com/video/ecmeQT7R7rk/v-deo.html
Wow, kalash have 40% indo European ancestry, interesting.
I would call the Corsicans either Corsican or Italian, they speak an Italian language and became French only couple centuries ago.
Where the heck is Dagestan ? Avars are like 40% Yamnaya.
Uh… these are more focused the current state of he people living in the countries than the genetic origins of the ethnic groups. For example the germanic and slavic ethnic groups normally have a closer relation the the indoeropeans while the scandanavian groups (although their ancestors have close geographic and distant ethnic relations to the indoeuropeans) are not infact descended directly from them. It’s also worth mentioning that the west turkic groups like the oghuz turks and avar turks are also descended from the indoeuropeans.
Scandinavians mostly descend from corded ware lineages. I1, R1b-U106 and R1a-Z284 are all found in corded ware groups and are not from native Scandinavia, Neolithic samples from Scandinavia mostly carry I2 not I1. I1 is probably from corded ware.
What a gibberish
My man you do realize Scandinavian people are of Germanic origin?
Scandinavians are germanic
Isn't it kind of weird how the places that are closer to the central part of the Indo European homeland around the Black Sea Steppes and later Central Europe are less IE genetically today than others more on the periphery? I wonder how accurate it all is, or if the right reference populations are really being taken into account.
In a way it's just like American English is more conservative, more similar to Old English than contemporary English English
You see the remote areas people had less chance to mingle with other people historically.
@@alkazaryyy and a lot of demographic changes can occur through the millennia, even only through decades which we see is happening in Europe now.
Its because they migrated away from northern caucasus, soon other groups occupied their old homeland.
Yes, they moved throughout all that land, but then Levantines, Semites, Berbers, Arabs, Mongols, Turks, and general closeness to being in the "Middle" of every invasion that ever happened in the ancient world centered around the Fertile Crescent and Mediterranean that diluted the genes of the "closest" groups, while the more remote peoples retained the original "old" stock.
Nice video but one correction. Aryan is just a branch of indo european. Namely indo iranian. The term aryan DOES NOT mean all indo europeans
We don't know that for sure. The word Arya definitely meant noble or Freeman in yamnaya times. We don't know whether it got an ethnic meaning earlier than the Indo-iranian stage
@@sltruth317 THERE WAS NO "WORD" ARYAN in yamnaya times in the first place. The word arya itself is of indo iranian original.
You know we have a form of Aryaman in Celtic as Ariomanus? There are plenty of Arya cognates throughout Indo-European..it's definitely existed in Yamnaya times. The question is what were it's exact meanings during those times.
@@sltruth317 ok where is this word attested for the first time? That Celtic one
The word did develop out of the Indo-Iranian branch, and they were the first and only ones to use "Aryan" I don't know why people end up using it for all Indo-Europeans.
To save you time, with rough but accurate estimates based on appearance, history, archaeology, linguistics, etc.
Baltic, excluding Estonia - 80-90%
Poland/Slovakia - 80%
Scandinavia - 70-80%, Iceland and other Nordic islands being around 60-70%
Germanic areas + Czechia - 60%
England - 50-60% depending area
General Balkans - 40-55%
East and North France/Belgium - 50-55%
Ukraine, Belarus, Russia - 50-60%
Italy - 35-40%, sometimes lower in the south
Greece - 30-35%
Celtic areas - 25-35% Ireland often smaller
Iberian peninsula (excluding Basques) 30-45% depending area
Rest of France - 30-50%
Ossetia - 30-45%
Afghanistan/Tajikistan - 30-45%
Iran - 30--45% depending area
Armenia - 30-35
Kurdistan - 15-20%
Pakistan - 24-35%, sometimes higher or lower
North India - 20-30% Brahmin often higher
Take note that there are other areas with significant ancestry, but they often aren't of our groups.
Best greets from Serbia 🇷🇸
How wonderfully mixed our continent is! BTW, notice no correlation between language family a given population speaks and their actual ancestry. That's what complicated history gives you.
It usually correlates, with notable exceptions.
@@flintb6559 Well, there are three European countries with non-Indo-European languages: Estonia, Finland, and Hungary (plus Basque country and Turkey). All three have more than 43% of WSW ancestry (the range is from ~5% to ~53%).
@@bazoo513 Finland estonia and turkey also have siberian ancestry.
Finns on average have 10-15% east eurasian ancestry (automosally) yet haplowise Finnish males on average have %60 N1c haplogroup which originated in north china, these come from their uralic origins. Also u should note that uralic origin homeland wasnt so far away from indo-europeans. Proto-uralics were mainly neo-siberian and a little paleo-siberian(which contains ANE ancestry prob) but when some of them migrated west foward, they mixed with those who have wsh ancestry.
Practically finns have both wsh and uralic ancestry.
Funfact: Sami people also have one of the highest wsh ancestry in europe, but along with finns, they also have the highest east Eurasian ancestry. East Eurasian admixture among samis can go even up to %30.
Coming to Turkish people, its quiete different. Turkish people on average have %10-20 east eurasian ancestry, and %20-30 medieval Turkic ancestry. And greeks and other middle easterners do not have east eurasian admixture at all lol. Even east eurasian ancestry among anatolian turks can go up to %20 in southwest regions due to yörüks(nomadic Turkish people) because in seljuk times they settled many turkmen soliders in west coasts especially bcz those areas were hardest to conquer. So, oghuz Turkic migrations mostly focused on western regions of Anatolia. Also turkish people do not really have any ancestry in very high amounts. As i said, Greeks and other europeans and other middle easterners do not have Eastern eurasian ancestry in those amounts(except for finns, samis, karelians etc etc)
So it usually does correlate but ofc not always such as the best example are Hungarians. They barely have east eurasian admixture, even ukranians have higher east eurasian ancestry than them.
(Note: turks were never compelelty east eurasian, even proto-turkics due to their paleo-siberian ancestry, which includes ANE ancestry and Ancients north eurasian ppl had both similae amounts of west eurasian and east eurasian
@@k1r4z. Thanks for additional fascinating details. But still, my observation that modern day cultural and linguistic heritage correlates pretty poorly with genetic heritage stands. We have so complicated history, with so many migrations, conquests, assimilations, empires growing and waning, that this is inevitable. One of the reasons I like good old Europe 😀
@@bazoo513 you're right but the point was theres theres a correlation even if its poorly but in some cases theres no correlation such as like hungarians since they lost their ob-ugric and turkic ancestry
It surprises me how north India could have more WSH ancestory then the Greeks Italian french people, since India is so far away 🤔
Norther Indians have only 10 to 20%
While most average Indians don't even have 10%
@Arif he's not Indian lol
@@stormtrooper8420 highest is up to 30% iirc
@@stormtrooper8420 Umm average is the case for i guess for rest of the countries in North India average is 20% but Highest is 45% which is present in different communities.
@@Tea-oz4iy no the average is less 10%.
It's high among higher caste north indians
Interesting how smaller populations and island populations, especially small island populations, would naturally express a higher coefficient of inbreeding skewing figures to a higher homogeneity, in this case WSH.
I don't think haplagroups are very accurate. We don't even know where Proto indo Europeans lived, let alone have genetic samples from them. They emmigrated to regions where there was already stablished populations with defined life styles and forced their language on rhem. So it must be low percentage in Europe(with higher population at the time of neolithic period) and higher in western Asia, not the other way.
According to the latest studies of archaeologists, it is thought to be the zagros mountains, not the ukrain
What do you mean by Iran? As you know there are several people living in Iran such as Kurds, Persains, etc.
Hello, as a Turkish from one of the 24 Seljuks tribes from today Antalya in Turkey I have 20 % Yamnaya, 12 % Iranian, 30% Anatolian 10% Caucasus Hunter Gatherer, the rest is non European, am I from the old Sogdians, indo Aryans or eastern Iranians ? Scythians ?
Aren't you from one of the fake propagandist accounts?😅
@@papazataklaattiranimam no I’m just trying to learn
Why are Swedes so much lower? Is this counting ethnic Swedes, or just the population of Sweden in general?
The women might have more steppe ancestry the I Haplogroup on the male side is Neolithic like cheddar man more Mediterranean like Otzi
Interesting that Finland, which speaks a non indo european language has one of the highest
They are Uralo Altaic not Indo-European.
The origin of uralic and indo-europeans people arent way away lol. You have to add that, yes the proto-uralics were mainly neo-siberian but after proto-finno-ugrics moved west foward, they mixed with those who have high wsh ancestry so now thats why Finns now have the highest East Eurasian (due to their neo-siberian ancestry) in europe but they also have high wsh ancestry
Their ancestors are for the most part indoeuropeans, so nothing is particularly odd about it.
@@borivoj_navratil No, It's not
@@supermavro6072 Yes, predominantly Indo-Europeans speaking the Finnic language they switched to at one point in time.
Просматривается четкая зависимость от процентного наличия гаплогруппы R1a1 от направления на север и северо-восток. Однако должен заметить, что в Беларуси нет сейчас такого флага, какой был указан у вас в ролике! Когда-то был, но на референдуме в 1995г. от него отказались, так что не следует приписывать всем белорусам хотелки беглых националистов.
as a dutchman i am hyped up. i can ride horse real good and drink milk like water.
I'm 98% Welsh and English, baby. Top 10. Suck it.
Proud to be a Scot a whopping 51.3% that a lot
Yea solid number, I’m Macedonian ancestry, it interests me how you Scots have some similarities with us in regards to the bagpipes and the somewhat traditional costumes.
Yamnaya had R1b ydna but North Indians are R1a(~40-50%). So North Indians don't get IE from Yamnaya but earlier Aryan group because R1a is older than R1b. Also North Indians have the highest genetic diversity of R1a which supports them being the origin group for R1a. Also South Indians have the most R2a.
R2 maybe from iran neolithic, this is the brother of the haplogroup R1
R1a is the dominant Slavic gene found concentrated most in Poland, and Russia.
I don't think that is true about R1a diversity . That theory was based on very old data I believe. Much of Indian R1a is under Z93 which isn't that old relatively speaking . OIT is highly politicised unfortunately , and when you try and politicise science you are asking for trouble .
@@bernicia-sc2iw Politics have the tendency to ruin truth. But I was simply stating what I have been told to be true (according to researchers)
You wrong. Yamnaya is R1a.
❤❤❤
3:15 Sorry, Estonians were originally Finno-Ugric people and only over time mixed with the Baltic peoples and Slavs. 3:35 and the Finns are also a Finno-Ugric people, not Indo-European, then they also mixed somewhat with the peoples of the Swedes and Slavs...
These traditional outfits are not worn by most people, and give a totally false impression of the people in question. Most Germans don't wear what is shown as their traditional outfit, which is pretty much limited to Upper Bavaria and large parts of Austria.
We are talking about ethnicities, so it's right to show people in their traditional clothes.
@@masterjunky863 Look, I am Bavarian and have never worn outfits like that, and neither has the majority of Bavarians. What would a person from Chicago or Cleveland wear?
@@samreh6156 You should, don't let your culture and tradition die! I hope at least you can speak Bavarian (that is a language and not a dialect of German).
However Americans have no tradition or ethnic culture, so they don't have a real traditional dress like us European ethnicities.
@@masterjunky863 You are a romantic. Of course, I speak Oberbayrisch, but not like my grandparents spoke, and, believe it or not, most people living in Bavaria don't speak it. They speak mostly standard German, Hochdeutsch, though their accent will probably tell you where they are from.
@@samreh6156 Yes, I'm indeed a romantic.
I know most people there don't speak it, it's the same here in Lombardy (northern Italy), most of young people don't speak the Lombard language. It's really sad the way we are losing our tradition to be part of a shitty Americanized globalist world.
kalash and nuristani have only around 20-35% total steppe_mlba, through granted some of it is emba from kumsay and aigrydzhal like sources
How about the Turkish people? The Turkish or Anatolians and Thracian people originally spoke an Indo European language which is the called the Anatolian languages which are a subgroup of the indo European language family.
Exactly originally that language branch is extinct
@Царят на мрака Thrace is part of modern day Turkey
@Царят на мрака the Frigians came from Thracia to live in
turkey.
Turkish people actually still do have majority of their Indo-European DNA intact.
@@thegodofthegods1084 Of course most of their DNA are derived from the people before the Turks came to Anatolia
"Aryan" is a SANSKRIT word. It was used in India and Iran. ONLY.
Indo Iranians are aryans
Aristo in greek n frencg
ces pourcentages sont faux! L'haplogroupe R et sa sous-clade R1b (indo-européen ou Yamna) de la lignée Y, qui est devenu typique de l'européen depuis 3 à 4000 ans avant JC, est prédominant avec environ 50% en Allemagne, en Italie, en France, en Espagne et bien sûr plus encore en Grande Bretagne. C'est l'haplogroupe I le plus ancien d'Europe qui est dominant en Scandinavie, Balkans et Sardaigne
Surprisingly, northern India rank higher than Iran
*nothwest india and even then its minorities there that have european features. As well as north pakistan and parts of afghanistan. Nursitanis, people of gilgit, some kashmiris, some pashtuns, some specific types of punjabis like Khatri punjabis(see Rohail Hyatt)
@@zainm5919 especially Nuristani peoples
@@papazataklaattiranimam yep
It is important that the Iranian people are Aryans with pride
when the Mongol Turks produced the sound of wolf howls
Achaemenid Darius called himself Aryan✌
Great video, could you do one for corded ware culture ancestry if possible? And also include ancient DNA?
I find it fascinating that the original Rig Veda Aryans for example were more genetically akin to those of the Nordic bronze age, and in turn modern Norwegians than they are to most modern Indians (e.g. Brahmins, maybe Haryana Jatts are an exception.)
@@sltruth317 Not the Norwegians, but the Sami.
@@mr.purple1779 No. the saami are 25% Siberian and have generally a very low amount of WSH admixture.
@@bossschmutzfink9865 WSH were rich in ANE pedigree. Paleo Siberians, Jomon people, Plains Native Americans, WSHG much closer to them.
ua-cam.com/video/zV5Wseu_aYg/v-deo.html
@@sltruth317 Definatly not Norwegians, but most likely Slavs.
Kalash and nuristanis have less then 30% Steppe herder component. This 40% + is wrong info. They have less IVC component so are paler.
Manu was a Hindu from INdia. Focus.
What about us Americans of random northern Europe ancestry? I'm thinking Minnesotans are going to be rather high with the upper peninsula of Michigan taking the cake. How would all that recombination affect the IE ancestry reading? For example I'm at least Swedish Norwegian Scottish English and German.
It depends on what ethnicity you are, Celtic, Germanic, Uralic or Slavic???.
For example, the Nordics are made up of two ethnic groups and their mixtures, the Germanic and the Uralic. The Germanics are descendants of the Corded Ware culture of 4500 years ago, the Uralics are descendants of the Corded Ware and the Asians of the Ural Mountains, that is why the Samis or the Finns or the Ugriks speak languages of Asian origin and not Indo-Europeans, they carry their Asian Siberian and Indo-European genes. Phenotypically the Uralics are whiter than the Germanics themselves
In America Georgian is the most ancient nation🤣
im moroccan with 3-5% WSH, glad to be part of the family (sort of)
Your welcome to the family Moroccan bro
Lmfao
I want to ask those here... Who named your continent Europe? What does europe mean? Which language does Europe come from?
I wont simplify the Indian part as simply Northern Indian. I think North West Indian (Punjab region, etc) people have higher percentage of WSH dna than the rest of India.
That video is obsolete whatsoever Indians whether northern or southern never go over 15-20%, only some really isolated groups but than again since they always have high ancestral Indian ancestry (over 30%) they're not racially Eurasian and can't even be compared to Pontic Caspian Steppe people who where fully Eurasian.
@@qaimaqyakh2708 what about the jats how much ancestry do you think they have
@@smartcookie11 Don't ask him, he'll spread misinformation. Muslims Jutts of Pakistan are 26% steppeMLBA on average, their AASI is 24-25%. Rest of their ancestry is IVC/BMAC.
Sikh Jatts from Indian Punjab are 27-34% steppeMLBA usually, their AASI is 20-22%. Rest is IVC/BMAC.
Hindu Jaats of Haryana/Delhi NCR are 32-40% steppeMLBA usually, their AASI is 17-21%. Rest is IVC/BMAC ancestry.
And Hindu Rors of Haryana are 35-45% steppeMLBA usually, their AASI is 15-21%. Rest is IVC/BMAC.
Kambojas who are spread in Haryana/Punjab/Himachal/Jammu/Chandigarh are 24-30% steppeMLBA and their AASI is 14-19%. Rest is BMAC/IVC.
*****None of these above groups are higher castes. Historically, they have had either low caste status or have been just non-followers of caste system altogether. Brahmins with lesser steppe ancestry & much higher AASI ancestry are higher in caste status than these groups. This needs to be told to euro supremacists who love to associate higher caste status with steppe.******
Khatris who are spread in Punjab/Haryana/Delhi NCR/Himachal/Jammu are 25% steppeMLBA on average, 20% AASI. Rest of their ancestry being BMAC/IVC. Those Bollywood families with last names like Kapoor/Khanna are khatris. Look up celebs like Twinkle Khanna, Kareena Kapoor, Ranbir Kapoor, Shanaya Kapoor for context. AND NO, they're not the whitest *liGhtEst bRighTeSt rAre* Indians as many people like to spread this wrong narrative. They are just SUB-GROUPS of khatris from North who were successful in setting up their families while founding Bollywood in Mumbai. Plenty of even lighter Indians than them exist in above Delhi region of India.
For reference... Kalash of Chitral Valley in Pakistan, who follow some form of ancient hinduism, are 25-30% steppeMLBA, their AASI is 0-10%. Rest is BMAC/IVC.
@@jmab721 wow thanks for the insight, this really surprised me how Jatts is Pakistan have less WSH DNA than people in haryana, since it falls more further south. Hard to believe that the Rors could have as much WSH as Germans, which is 45 percent WSH i believe.
@@smartcookie11 No, notice that I mentioned MLBA, and not EMBA. WSH is steppeEMBA. It is the MLBA ancestry from which we have to calculate WSH among south asians/central asians/Iranians. 70% of this MLBA is WSH. Which means that Rors are maximum 31% WSH, and not higher than that. And usually hindu Jaats/Rors of Haryana 25-30% WSH.
Maximum yamnaya(WSH) is taken as 30% for south asia. That's the maximum limit. Northern Europeans are 40-50% of this same WSH ancestry.
The decreasing importance of endogamy can be a factor as to why hindu jaats of Delhi/Haryana region are most steppe, then it is sikh jatts of Indian punjab, and then least of these 3 are muslim jutts of Pak Punjab.
I seriously doubt Northern Indians are 20-30 percent *western* steppe herder (e.g. Yamnaya). They could be 20-30% *central* steppe herder (e.g. Sintashta) however. That's something I see everywhere, people talking about steppe ancestry and mixing up steppe EMBA & steppe MLBA (which is only 60% steppe EMBA). 12-18% WSH should be closer to reality. I haven't watched the rest of the video but I assume you made the same mistake for the other Asian populations.
indian have slightly more WSH than Steppe_MLBA as IVC itself had some siberian HG ancestry at 10%.
he did make that mistake and kind of corrected it in a later video. south asians barely have any steppe dna left because the regions were already populated, even the brahmins have lower steppe dna than southern europeans.
@@MeatGoblin88
Brahmins still have 25%-30% steppe.
Jats and Rors have higher 30%-35% due to Scythian ancestry
@@Shivansh-rr7bcThat is Sintashta. Brahmins have around ~20% Steppe DNA just like the average N. Indian, while Jats have ~25% and rors have around 28%.
The only significant Yamnaya steppe ancestry population in India is of Jats and Rors, not even Kalash have as much. But by traditional original definition N. India is the most Aryan, since it describes the Vedic people.
The more you are blonde the more you have steppe related ancestry aka indo european
Thats way wrong
@@mrkslva4231 then why the Nordic have the highest aryan ancestry
@@mrkslva4231 lol
Aryan means white
@@demi9826 Aryan means noble
Are u american lol😂
Interesting. It seems like a south-to-north gradient.
Not really there are Indians and iranic people with more WSH than some european groups. This video didnt include Pashtuns and nuristani people in south asia
@@mrkslva4231 yeah. A Nort-to-south gradient *in Europe.
@@wezzuh2482 From Siberia to the west
South Europe was more densely populated by farmers while in the north it was mostly inhabited by hunter gatherer bands.
Fun fact, most white Americans, Canadians, and Australians and Kiwis have more WSH DNA than most southern Europeans.
The Yamnaya heritage went worldwide genetically, culturally, linguistically.
The Indo-Europeans nicknamed Yamnaya expand 6000 years ago in two directions, one towards Asia and the other towards Asia, their expansion in Europe was much more successful, however the continent was not empty since it was inhabited by the ancient populations of Europe of Haplogroup I, The Indo-Europeans displaced or replaced the Western European I2 lineages, Southern Europeans like the Balkans have large amounts of DNA from these ancient Europeans, and the Sardinians in Italy are the only pure I2 haplogroup, their DNA is the same as the Neolithic, the Iberians have 30% Indo-European European Yamnaya, we must not forget that the Asians also have Indo-European DNA like the Iranians and North India and North Pakistan
@@eltecnico9541 What's a north Pakistani? Aren't Pakistanis North Indians, since the country is just north-west of India?
@@lologege5466 Yes, but why?
What is the source for the percentages? None of the links provided in the video description have values such as "5.3" and "52.9".
An amateur vahaduo model is the source which is also false and poorly made. For example swedes do not have 45% while danes and norwegians have 50%. The indians and kalash people do not have 30-50% yamnaya ancestry. They only have 5-20% european hunter gatherer genes. Yamnaya had 66% and scandinavians like swedes 50%. They are geting false positives from a separate CHG source in the yamnaya genome. The sources mentioned has nothing to do with the amateur picture linked.
@@Hejo-gz5zh Thank you. Do you have a better source for the percentage of Yamnaya in different European groups? I would like to see that.
Aryans were only the ancient indo-Iranian sub group of indo Europeans. You’re spreading misinformation by designating the entire indo-European people as Aryan
They originated in Eastern Europe whose one branch went to India via Central Asia and mixed with IVC women who were darker in looks but caucasian in looks due to Neolithic Iran dna .
@@JonOmega-mf4dm The ancestral matrix of Haplogroup R originates in Central Asia, migrates to the Altai giving rise to the mal'ta buret culture, this human group spreads through Central Asia and the Americas, reaches India and eastern Europe, from eastern Europe the Proto-Indo-Europeans originate
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d I was talking about proto indo Europeans only because Indians have ne euro dna while Europeans don't have any Indian dna
@@JonOmega-mf4dm Yes, Indians and Europeans share DNA with the Ancient North Eurasian an ancient form of Siberian, later East-Central Asian European DNA was inherited by Indians, but Europeans did not inherit DNA from the Indian subcontinent
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d Yes you are right
What is the correlation of adult lactase persistance to the WSH genotype.
High correlation
Mother of all languages is Proto Serbian and I can prove it. Do you know that wild Greeks came to Pelasgian land and found culture and proto Serbian language and they just mixed with Pelasgian people and learned everything there? Here are just some examples. You can see first word is Serbian, second word is Greek and third word is German (Serbian, Greek and German) (ili-Alla-aber) (utočište- eutoichiste- Zuflucht) (blizu-pljsion-nahe) (breme- brjme- Gewicht) (koliba- kalyba- Hütte) (hod- hod-Gang) (Tece voda protiv vode-Teke wudas proti wudei-Es fliest Wasser gegen Wasser) (činim- xinjm- ich thue) (daleko- tale ko- entfernt) (dar-dar- Geschenk) (danak- danj- Abgabe) (delim- dieljm- ich teile) (Dever- dawer- Schwager) (trljam- tribo- ich reibe) (dom- dom- zu hause) (drzim- drassjm- ich halte) (duplo- diploo- verdoppele) (dva- dwo-zwei) (idu- ithuo- ich gehe) (jedan- jadon- eine) (grebu- grabo- kratzen) (kakim- kakam- ich scheiße) (klizam- kluzam- ich gleite) (glina- gli- klei) (kljuc- kljs- Schlüssel) (komora- kamara- kammer) (kanim- koinam- ich thue) (Koliko- kelikos-wieviel) (Kos- kossyf- Amsel) (klisura- klision- Schlucht) (kobila- kaballes-Stutte) (kokot- kokkos-Hahn) (leto- leto-jahr) (levo- laevos-linke) (mak- mak-Mohn) (manje- mjon-weniger) (mama-mamma- Mutter) (muva- muia- Fliege) (meljem- mullem- ich mahle) (merim- meirjm- ich messe) (mesec- meis- Mond) (magla-omichla- Nebel) (nosim-nisso-ich trage) (oko- oko- Auge) (orem- arom-ich ackere) (palica-pelekys-Keule) (put-pat-Weg) (pecem-peso-ich brate) (pero-ptero-Feder) (pijem- pjm-ich trinke) (pivo- pino- Bier)
Sanskrit is made-up from Proto Serbian and are the same languages. Here some samples Sanskrit-Serbian-English: (bele-belo-white) (ghughu-gugutka-turtle dove) (dub-dubok-deep) (kaši-kašalj-cough) (kaste-kosa-sickle) (Mata-Mati-Mother) (madhu-med-honey) (majh-medja-boundary) (meša-mešati-to mix) (thunko-tanko-thin) (mara-umreti-to die) (baba-babo-father) (balak-balavac-immature person) (beg-beg-flight) (bedana-beda-grif) (bhrata-brat-brother) (churi-cura-girl) (Gra-Grad-Town) (Lod-Lud-Crazy) (Ljubhva-Ljubav-Love) (Deti-Dete-Child) (Smajase-Smeje se-Lahghing) (Sladu-Slatki-Sweet) (Kadajati-Kidati-Tear) (Suri-Svetli-Bright) (Mač-Mač-Sword) (Bhaga-Bog-God) (Nava-Novi-New) (Moru-Mora-Nightmare) (Čamarika-Čemerika-Hellebore) (Sobha-Soba-Room) (Krsti-Krst-Cross) (Tama-Tama-Dark) (Zvana-Zvono-Bell) (Dina-Dan-Day) (Apat-Patnja-Suffering) (Itvara-Utvara-Spook) (Inoti-Inatiti-Spite) (Učjati-Uciti-Learn) (Uda-Voda-Water) (Košah-Koža-Skin) (Kapalam-Kapa-Cap) (Kabila-Kobila-Mare)
Please note additional reference Book from Alokananda Mitter Calcuta India, Similarities between Bengali and Sanskrit and Serbian.
Almost everyone is an racially mixed person. So, racially pure people is a complete nonsense.
Yes. Exactly
Which populations have the most AHG/EEF type ancestry back in Anatolia?
Anatolia was inhabited by Greeks, Phoenicians (Semitic peoples) and Armenians back then.
@@ErPuglia I should've left a reference
How'd you get 40%+ from Finns, they do not have high R1A or anything else considered Indo European.
ua-cam.com/video/8mSb7-uGnbk/v-deo.html : one of the greatest turkic empires
@@lologege5466 ok that has nothing to do with my comment.
Finns spoke an Indo-European language before being Uralicized, thus Finns have a high proportion of Yamnaya genes
@@unique_handle_1066 Aren't they genetic isolates? And what are the yamnaya genes? Any specific haplogroup associated?
@@Veritas-dq2hs There is no such thing as a "genetic isolate" as all (living) humans come from mitochondrial eve and y chromosome adam. Just some groups share more recent genetic material from others.
Specific haplogroups associated with the Yamnaya are R1a and R1b. This is evidence by the fact that R1a is found both in Eastern Europe and among Northern Indian Brahmins.
I'm not sure about how material Yamnaya genes, but it appears people who lived far away from the original homeland of the Yamnaya (Western Europeans, Indians) have very little Yamnaya maternal genes while those who lived close to the Yamnaya homeland (eastern europeans and Iranians) have more Yamnaya maternal genes.
However, it is important to realize that research into the Yamnaya / steppe culture is only a few decades old (a very short time from a scientific perspective), and theories about IE origin will likely change in the future as technology gets better and we have more data.
Well, the author may not know what the flag of Belarus looks like... but it turns out that the "British scientists" together do not know what the flag looks like. The British sciences apparently do not yet know that Fins belong to the Finougorian language family, etc.But then it is not surprising that the islanders are the main Proto-Indo-Europeans... lmao.
I think there should have been a distinction between north and south germany, seeing how dutch people are far more genetically distinguished from (probably southern) germans in this video
Das Ding ist, dass wir Deutschen ein sehr vielfältiges Volk sind. Wir haben allein schon wegen der Hansezeit so viel unterschiedliches Blut in uns, wie zum Beispiel aus Skandinavien oder Holland. Aber auch aus anderen Nachbarländern. Bei uns kommt es tatsächlich drauf an
Yea, southern Germans like Bavarians are middle easterners anyways, northerns are like Danish.
Why are the same Y haplos quite equally present in western Europe,Niklas are you refering about the autosomal dna?Dont forget the most germans who fled WW2 "back to Reich " have setlled in southern Germany.The royal subclade of R1b DF 96 I think from the House of Wettin is almost present in modern Royalties across Europe.People,genes dont have "culture",there are not tipically for a culture or borders of modern countries,as we see p.e. the genes of the Hungarians,which are in modern times everything but no finougric.
@@erik6280 Every nation is like this not just Germans. All of us humans are related and very mixed.
@roberto lang The bavarians,suabian or the allemans?Hallstat and La tene are the same culture in distinct time stamps and locations,yes there are relicts of massive celtic presence in southern modern Germany below the chatii region,today Hessen,but dont forget the antic Bajuvaroz,the Markomanii,Francs and so on which assimilated the romanized celts of the region.
You missed the eastern iranic(eastern branch of the yamnaya) groups like pashtuns,baloch,dari/farsi speaking people etc
@roberto lang during the peak of the Abbasid caliphate.a single empire ruled from Iberian peninsula all the way to Baluchistan.it makes sense
@roberto lang no need to insult me lol,all I did was present my hypothesis.
Finnish are not Indo European.Iranians have highest percentage of pure gene followed by North Indian.Only skin tone doesn't make you Indo-European.
The language is not. Have you ever seen a Finn? Researches tell Finland has got percentually most blondies in the world.
Watch the video "Which country has the most blondies?" The answer is Finland.
@@cinderellaandstepsisters blondness is adaptation to the cold environment.That blone hair,blue eye concept of Max Muller is not authenticated.
Whatever, we are still whiter than you that's very simple while you arrived to Finland. I have never seen Indian with blonde hair and blue eyes.
@@vikramadityahindu8591 so eskimos should blondest
@@jukkahelisjoki5820 YAMANAYAS WERE NOT FULLY BLONDE. FIRST THEY MOSTLY WERE DARK HAIRED . BUT FINISH AND EUROPEANS IN GENERAL MIGHT HAVE GOT IT FROM NATIVE EUROPEAN HUNTER GATHERERS OR MUTATION IN GENES. AGAIN. ALSO THEIR PERCENTAGE OF STEPPE IS LOW. I FEEL GERMANS MADE A MESS OF STEPPE AND MAKE INTO EUROPEAN WHEN IT'S PART OF EUROPEAN ANCESTORY BUT NOT FULLY EUROPEAN. SOME BRAHMINS HAVE BLONDE HAIR AND THE WAY THEY ARE ENDO-GAMOUS IT COULD MEAN THAT YAMNAYAS MAY HAVE IT BUT NOT IN LARGE QUANTITY U DEFINITELY GOT IT FROM UR NATIVE ANCESTORS
where one could find a Indo-European tribe monument geographically speaking?
And do let us know how you came to piece together the mapping of genetics to ethnicity and linguistics?!
What is your standard for "Aryan" heritage for comparison with each sub-groups, especially when the whole steppe theory has been proved incorrect or atleast incomplete and the Aryan Invasion/Migration theory into India has been long debunked!
aryan invasion theory makes sense bro my mom with family from punjab and kashmir looks hella ambiguous, she's been confused for different ethnicities. The further north you go in pakistan and into afghanistan as well, the more drastically different people look from the rest of the people in the "indian/south asian subcontinent". That's the most plausible reason. You can't just say its the weather difference.
@@markusmath3421 truth. We brahmins look very different from other communities. No matter the place we're from
@@shreyaskumarrath721 you baman doesn't look different frm dalits🤣🤣🤣
@@gajendrasinghbhati4490 lol no. You're a lot darker. Few Brahmins look like that usually those who intermixed at some point.
@@shreyaskumarrath721 You brahmins look darker than adivasis.
You missed out the Turkish people
Iran means "land of aryans". So I expected them to be genetically closest to the WSH. How come this is not the case?
Name means nothing since "aryan" is a sanskrit word
That's because using the term "Aryan" to describe any non Indo-Iranian people is patently false lol
@Jiraiya Sennin that makes no sense. Go back to school
Iranians are heavily mixed with Ancient Mesopotamians and Fertile Crescent peoples
@@__Man__ oh yes sir where is PHD
What does WSH Ancestry mean?
WSH = Western Steppe Harder, a synonym for yamna/yamnaya
Steppe ancestry
where is Armenian?
Lol
😂😂😂😂😂
i think it's just linguistic connection i didn't expect genetic similarity
India is the motherland of all.
India isn't the real name. It's Bharat which is 5600 year old named after the king Bharata.
@@punjabtabla True, I wrote cz the foreigners won't understand that now
Jai Sanaatan Raastra Mitra 🤜🏻🤛🏻😎🚩
Manjil yaad rahe.
Yes
As a North Greek I can confirm we do get 30% or even higher IE admixture, the rest is mostly Neolithic and around 10% WHG
Greeks are north africans anyways.
As a Northern Greek, I can confirm you that we Greeks aren't heIIenes at all, We are mostly Turkish mixed with SIavic and AIbanians.
ua-cam.com/video/8mSb7-uGnbk/v-deo.html : one of the greatest turkic empires
@@supermavro6072 Speak for yourself "Northern Greek", your grandfather probably came to our land 100 years ago from mount Ararat.
@@supermavro6072 albanians, turks and slavs have quite different faces compared to greeks. Maybe are you the one thats quite mixed? The vast majority of greek population looks distinct compared to the others you mentioned.
Really surprised seeing Pakistan Great Britain and Iceland having more than Germany and Russia
And Finland
Also I understand why Iceland and Nuristan have so much. Coz they were isolated cultures. But Ireland?
Not Pakistan, only nuristanis and the kalash have more WSH dna
What about Gilgit Baltistanis, and the ethnic groups next to the Kalash, since they would pick up admixtures from them, so would have a higher component.
@greek nationalist dddddddddddddddddddd
What on earth?
Aren't afghans and Pakistanis anywhere from 30% to 10% greek. How does that make sense?
What haplogroups were taken into account? Mithocondrial ADN or haplogroups of the chromosome and human? Because nordic people is population with more amount haplogrouos pre-indoerupean more especific haplogroup I like balkaniks and Sardinian
There are only 2 sex chromosome X and Y so called haplos ,female and male,the females have only mT X inherited from the nanas,mums anf daughters and so on,and the Y inherited form the male line also grandpa,father to sons and so on.Females have ever XX and the males XY.The thing whith chromosome and human is only rubbish, you where thinking of course to the autosomal DNA of the other 23 chromosomes which is incompletely used to define from where you are.
@@ver_idem
ua-cam.com/video/09GsPp-iIJM/v-deo.html
@@ver_idem ua-cam.com/video/FeMt-R_2wPA/v-deo.html
Results look believable (showing direct correlation with distribution of so-called "Nordic" phenotype) EXCEPT for Indians and Nurestanis/Kalash where they are absurdly high. Later areas were densely inhabited by superior cultures before Aryans came, so latter influence was merely cultural/linguistic but CLEARLY not genetic as phenotypes evidently show
In reality, the phenotype does not correspond to the genetic load but rather to the number of dominant genes, the WSH genes are very receptive, so they are easily diluted and disappear, a large part of the European Phenotype corresponds to the CGH Caucasus Gatherer Hunters, the average White European phenotype is a mixture of the WSH and HCG Phenotype, we know from genetic studies that people from North India and Pakistan have a high genetic load of WSH similar to Southern Europeans however the type of mixture is different, because in Europe the mixture is WSH (Western Steppe Herder) with GCH, in South Asia the mixture is WSH with hunter gatherers from South Asia
Another way to see it is by Haplotypes that tell us which human lineages they belong to, Europeans have Haplotypes R1a, R1b, I and J2, people from India have Haplotypes H, J2, L, R1a and R2, people from India they share two lineages with Europeans and a third lineage that is closely related to Europeans which is R2
Indians are not a race. This video only mentions North Indians. Indians are multi racial. There are Caucasians, East Asians, Australoids and even a very tiny amount of African people who number only a few thousands
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d I don't think so... The minority of Indians that do not show hunter gatherer influence in phenotype (Veddoid) are almost indistinguishable from Iranians. Dravidians show the same pattern although Veddoid admixture is almost always present there. The only Indian ethnic groups where Aryan phenotype is even possible are "Dards" (eg: Kalash).
Modern South Asians are largely a mixture of Iranian settlers that came during neolithic and mesolithic inhabitants (called "Veddoid" by anthropologists) present there for tens of thousands of years (Veddas or Irulas are best representatives today, but most are obviously mixed too).
Demographically it is impossible for Aryans to have left much of an influence in Indus valley, which hosted a great urban civilization before. Personally I also find it exaggerated among Northern Europeans also. In terms of phenotype, only a minority carry influences from invaders' phenotypes: 80%+ of Europeans look like mixtures between Neolithic settlers and mesolithic natives (among Indians even more).
@@lucianpopescu3896 Racial classifications by phenotype are broadly very useful but they do not tell us everything, genetics is a much more precise classification and gives us a much more complex and mixed reality between the different human groups, the genotype is not the same as the phenotype In general, dominant genes manifest in the phenotype and recessive genes do not manifest, for recessive genes to manifest they must have several copies or not possess the dominant gene. Humans with the most recessive genes are those that have undergone inbreeding, humans with the most recessive genes are East Asians, followed by Europeans and the Middle East, and humans with the most dominant genes are Sub-Saharan Africans
Ireland on top
2016? it's not WSH, but WSH mixed with IE- like hunter-gatherer. The modern map would be different.
I thought Aryan colloquially meant Sintashta (Proto-Indo Iranian) specifically and not other Yamnaya descendants.
You are correct and There is Sintashta video which says they were R1b R1a and Q and most genetically similar to Irish and Baltic people also Indians Slavic people have bottlenecks that’s why they are mostly R1a ancient Iranians had Q and R1b not just R1a also corded ware Yamnaya Iranians Indoeuropeans were all related
I am a part of this group too and I love it
What's the source of these result? After 5000 years later is it possible some people to carry %50 of their genetics from people who died 5000 years later?
If they dont mix with other peoples.
Не показывайте это видео украинцам, которые любят утверждать, что русские - это помесь монголов с финнами. Хотя индоевропейских генов у финнов и русских даже больше
The Finns are among the humans with the most Indo-European DNA from the steppes but also among those with the most North Asian Siberian DNA, which is in contrast to much of Europe, the Finns are definitely very interesting.
Cope
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d Proto-European peoples migrated from Siberia to Europe...all Europeans look like Asians in infancy, but during the period of growing up, Asian facial features change to European ones...
@@start3215 The Proto-Europeans lived in Asia, but they had no DNA of modern East Asia. The ANE are 75%-80% Western Eurasian and 20%-25% Basal Eurasian, but the Basal Eurasians were more similar to the Australomelanesians (Onge, Aeta, Indigenous Australians, Melanesians, Indigenous Australians), they did not resemble the typical Asians we know. On the other hand, European Babies have greater facial projection, simply because at a younger age they have greater neotemia, Asians are born with flatter faces than babies, so they are different from Europeans and better preserve their neotemia. Most Europeans have no East Asian mixture, only Europeans of Finn-Ugric ancestry, such as Finns, Northern Sweden, Karelian Russians, etc.
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d 80% of the French have an Asian admixture ( alpine race admixture)
Cmon man there is a lot of ppl with wsh you didnt add them
Thanks to genetics we know that the first modern humans were dark-skinned and that for a very long time,light-skinned humans evolved much later in the Pontic steppe.
Skin color is smallest difference between races.
@@paskahousu8884 Yes I know,I just wanted to point out that the depictions of the Cro-Magnons with fair skin are not correct.
@@bayramaktas4135 it is lol
Only percentage of WSH genes has been given - 5% upwards.,
The max is ~56%, what is the balance, 44% to 95%?
It depends about the calculation method the so called algorhytm and of course of the number of datas from the people and the most datas revealed are from the "white indo aryans" also another big gap to fulfill,100x1k datas in comparison whith the few datas in your zone.
Looks like we're one big family and shouldn't fight eachother. Even Russians and Ukranians share almost 50% of their DNA. Yoint effords would result in much more prosperity for everyone than the destruction that only one disgusting war criminal started.
Biden?
@@start3215
Yeah, and also putroon
Not sure why used used globohomo flag for Belarus
I am aware that this video is not a credible source of information. However, I was surprised of not finding Pashtuns in the list. Pashtuns- who speaks the most ancient Indo-European language that still exists, Pashto. Who gave words Arya, India and according to many historian 'Ester' to the world. Their homeland between River Oxus and River Indus had been called Aryana until very recent.
Arya word is not derived from Pashtuns. Sanskrit scholars called themselves Aryans before anyone else did. Only Iran and Indian subcontinent people called themselves Aryans first
@@shreyaskumarrath721 Sanskrit language came very late to existence. Pashtuns are cateogrized into Indo-Iranian group while Pashto language is considered the oldest among them that is still spoken.
@@TehaklProduction source: it was revealed to me in a dream . Sanskrit is oldest living language dude
@@shreyaskumarrath721 keep dreaming, my dear.
@@TehaklProduction even google would tell you. It is at least 5000 years old. Pashto is a much recent language
As a swede i have heard that there came folk from around where Turkey is now and settled in Scandinavia. I think they lived by farming. Is this correct?
Yes, the modern European population descends from three clearly differentiated ancestral human groups, the ancient populations of Europe from the Mesolithic (10,000-5,000 years), the Farmers of Anatolia (Turkey) from the Neolithic (6,000-4,000 years) and the Indo-Europeans. of the Neolithic who lived in what are the Russian steppes. The Indo-Europeans and the Anatolian Farmers entered the interior of Europe and mixed with the ancient Mesolithic hunter gatherers who already lived there.
The Indo-Europeans expand from the Russian steppes and bring the Indo-European languages to Europe, South Asia and in western China with the Tocharians, North India have Indo-European DNA and speak languages of the Indo-European family, parts of Pakistan and also Iran, in fact the Brahmins in India claim to be descended from them. The Tocarians become extinct with the expansion of the Asian Turks, these are known as the white mummies in China
@@animewixx4341 Thanks for answering!
The neolithic anatolian farmers were not turks though, they were white people with brown eyes brown hair