The podcast I was referring to is "Issues, Etc," something of a semi-official podcast of the LCMS. Most week's they'll have two sequences later in the week on the lectionary. Both are titled "Looking Forward to Sunday Morning." One goes through the traditional 1-year lectionary, and the other goes through the 3-year. As for the other, I believe Steven was talking about EEBO, "Early English Books Online," a database of scans of books from prior centuries. I think there are a couple different online portals to access it these days. Not to be confused with Igbo or Ibo, the West African language spoken by our bishop!
@@allsaintsanglicanchurchofs3915 Ah! thanks, I did find a neat item that lets me make double bass sounds on my bass guitar looking for "Ebow" but I think EEBO will be better for my long term reading! Why did so many churches follow Rome to the 3 year lectionary?
Hah! I forgot about the guitar Ebow! The short answer for the Lectionary is that it really develops mid-20th century as an attempt at providing more Scripture and more variety in readings at Communion. Everyone very quickly jumped on the bandwagon as part of the mid-20th century optimism with regards to ecumenism. Rome had Vatican II and everyone thought that the reunion of the Church's institutional divisions was right around the corner. That "optimistic ecuminism" was very much a part of the Liturgical Movement's advocacy in those days.
@@allsaintsanglicanchurchofs3915 I would say that instead of trying to stuff more scripture into the Communion service, the solution was to push the Daily Office, since a disuse of the Office would be the root of the problem of a lack of scripture knowledge, It makes sense that Rome didn't use it because it was, and still is to my knowledge, an unwieldy thing with 8 Hours of Prayer a day, but why did we abandon our Office for Rome's Communion? Is this why I don't see many Anglican Churches offering Morning and Evening Prayer? It just looks to me like Rome tried to solve a problem Anglicans solved ~400 years ago, but forgotten in the last few decades, and we joined them in their solution rather than our own. Does that make sense and what do you think of it? Was it worth it to break so many hundreds of years of tradition, continuity, and resources?
What Lutheran podcast were you referring too? What is EBow at ~10:15?
The podcast I was referring to is "Issues, Etc," something of a semi-official podcast of the LCMS. Most week's they'll have two sequences later in the week on the lectionary. Both are titled "Looking Forward to Sunday Morning." One goes through the traditional 1-year lectionary, and the other goes through the 3-year.
As for the other, I believe Steven was talking about EEBO, "Early English Books Online," a database of scans of books from prior centuries. I think there are a couple different online portals to access it these days. Not to be confused with Igbo or Ibo, the West African language spoken by our bishop!
@@allsaintsanglicanchurchofs3915 Ah! thanks, I did find a neat item that lets me make double bass sounds on my bass guitar looking for "Ebow" but I think EEBO will be better for my long term reading!
Why did so many churches follow Rome to the 3 year lectionary?
Hah! I forgot about the guitar Ebow!
The short answer for the Lectionary is that it really develops mid-20th century as an attempt at providing more Scripture and more variety in readings at Communion. Everyone very quickly jumped on the bandwagon as part of the mid-20th century optimism with regards to ecumenism. Rome had Vatican II and everyone thought that the reunion of the Church's institutional divisions was right around the corner. That "optimistic ecuminism" was very much a part of the Liturgical Movement's advocacy in those days.
@@allsaintsanglicanchurchofs3915 I would say that instead of trying to stuff more scripture into the Communion service, the solution was to push the Daily Office, since a disuse of the Office would be the root of the problem of a lack of scripture knowledge, It makes sense that Rome didn't use it because it was, and still is to my knowledge, an unwieldy thing with 8 Hours of Prayer a day, but why did we abandon our Office for Rome's Communion? Is this why I don't see many Anglican Churches offering Morning and Evening Prayer?
It just looks to me like Rome tried to solve a problem Anglicans solved ~400 years ago, but forgotten in the last few decades, and we joined them in their solution rather than our own. Does that make sense and what do you think of it? Was it worth it to break so many hundreds of years of tradition, continuity, and resources?
@@allsaintsanglicanchurchofs3915 Also, the Ebow sounds pretty good on Bass Guitar. With it I can make Pipe Organ sounds, kinda.