a proud year for Yale, two Nobel winners, Prof. James Rothman for Medicine and Prof. Rob Shiller for Economics, whose seminars I happened to attend a few when I was at Yale.
The thing is there is a time constraint... imagine curious nobel laureates talking and being asked about their work,,, ya that'll be a weekend retreat.
It's not like it would be hard to implement a timer as a stand-in for the non genius host. I've watched a few of these now, and she is a seriously off note.
The energy of this one was amazing, everyone got along and laughed, and the crowd of women really played a part in the opinions, no one looked hostile, this was my fav to watch.
she makes a good point though. I'm an economics student and a lot of the modules are not relevant at all to the majority of jobs that want economic students
The host, Zeinab Badawi is doing a good job here. She is an quite intelligent to be able to jeep up with some of the most seasoned intellectuals of our time.
There's 24 hours of a completely black screen which has more views than this video and all the other Nobel roundtables put together. I'd say it's sad but it's far, far worse than merely 'sad'.
The question about whether scientists do a good job communicating with the public is kind of weird. Firstly this neglects the certainty that most people consume their science news from journalists not scientists. So you could as well have asked who thinks that journalists do a good job as intermediaries between scientists and the public and that would have been a more sensible question. A completely separate question is _who thinks the public do a good job of interpreting the information that science offers?_ There has never been greater public access to frontier science than today. As a member of the public I would say the onus is not only on the scientists or the journalists but the public too. Wanting to be spoon fed your science by a scientist or a journalist is a lousy way to think. We are responsible for our own learning. If you look for the learning tools and resources they are always there. So I would happily have voted the opposite way to the majority of the audience. Scientists are doing a tremendous job of informing the public, but the public are largely not interested and that's not the fault of the scientists, that's the fault of a public who, by and large, are lazy and who expect to have to make no effort to understand their world.
After getting used to watch nd listen to them I realized how stupid the world has come to! Only uploading photos on Social media! Going to gym nd a random stupid guy posting a video getting 10 Mil. View on doing absolutely nothing!!! Just stupidity! Hats off Ladies nd gentlemen ❤️❤️nd brave laureates ❤️🌺
Nobel Minds 2023 has been released! Watch it now: ua-cam.com/video/VM8K8RnnfDM/v-deo.html
please tell the host lady to not interrupt when the guests are talking. she is so irritating'
There’s only 30k views? I love these conversations lmao
Other guys are busy seeing timepass sort of things
a proud year for Yale, two Nobel winners, Prof. James Rothman for Medicine and Prof. Rob Shiller for Economics, whose seminars I happened to attend a few when I was at Yale.
The moment with the mother is incredible
Yes, Professor peter higgs! Finally!
"The greatest minds" need to be given a better opportunity to talk...so ennoying to hear her keep interrupting these Laureates.
The thing is there is a time constraint... imagine curious nobel laureates talking and being asked about their work,,, ya that'll be a weekend retreat.
They gives lectures in their work that led to their prize, so they are given a chance to talk there, and as stated in another comment. Time constraint
@@jackkelly8677 she interrupted some time just to input her jokes which are not even funny
It's not like it would be hard to implement a timer as a stand-in for the non genius host. I've watched a few of these now, and she is a seriously off note.
This is my favourite thing to watch shame its only once a year.
The energy of this one was amazing, everyone got along and laughed, and the crowd of women really played a part in the opinions, no one looked hostile, this was my fav to watch.
Zainab pay attention to these great minds for god's sake. Just not calm. You're great talker and moderator but you need to be more attentive.
Some day, I will be there.
Same :)
All the best
The prize should never be your goal.
in the audience listening to me
@@timewalker6654 good one :)
she gave like 8 seconds for them to speak....
11:38 "Is it your role as professors of economics to teach students about economics?" And the nobel prize in question asking goes to......
she makes a good point though. I'm an economics student and a lot of the modules are not relevant at all to the majority of jobs that want economic students
she has a smart question. but it's your mind can't comprehend what she means!
The host, Zeinab Badawi is doing a good job here. She is an quite intelligent to be able to jeep up with some of the most seasoned intellectuals of our time.
Danke und alles Gute euch😊
Thank you Mr.Rothman!
Scientists speak truth always.
Rothman pushed her red button @4:32
yep
Questions start at 7:46
These videos have a few thousand views and cardi b gets millions. All you need to know about the stste of our world
There's 24 hours of a completely black screen which has more views than this video and all the other Nobel roundtables put together. I'd say it's sad but it's far, far worse than merely 'sad'.
yeah
There's a qualitative difference.
evolution
oh man this had potential to be good
The question about whether scientists do a good job communicating with the public is kind of weird. Firstly this neglects the certainty that most people consume their science news from journalists not scientists. So you could as well have asked who thinks that journalists do a good job as intermediaries between scientists and the public and that would have been a more sensible question. A completely separate question is _who thinks the public do a good job of interpreting the information that science offers?_ There has never been greater public access to frontier science than today. As a member of the public I would say the onus is not only on the scientists or the journalists but the public too. Wanting to be spoon fed your science by a scientist or a journalist is a lousy way to think. We are responsible for our own learning. If you look for the learning tools and resources they are always there. So I would happily have voted the opposite way to the majority of the audience. Scientists are doing a tremendous job of informing the public, but the public are largely not interested and that's not the fault of the scientists, that's the fault of a public who, by and large, are lazy and who expect to have to make no effort to understand their world.
you have a great point.
I agree with you.
I Love you All Nodel 🙏🇱🇰🌟👑🌻🌸🌷
Nodel All My Hero 💜🖤🧡❤💛💜🧡❤💛
awesome sociopolitical topics
RIP Peter Higgs.
Joe Rogan should host this discussion.
yeah
agreed
Where does energy come from?
Good mornig
After getting used to watch nd listen to them I realized how stupid the world has come to! Only uploading photos on Social media! Going to gym nd a random stupid guy posting a video getting 10 Mil. View on doing absolutely nothing!!! Just stupidity! Hats off Ladies nd gentlemen ❤️❤️nd brave laureates ❤️🌺
she is great.
Fresh
please change the host
Well said about politics in sciences
Michael Levitt rocks.
"Huge waste of talent!" Well said.
Good discussion. More money on higher education and chances for women to become great scientists.
The Funny Frenchman !
The grandpa’s club
Mine
I love Physicists! They are irreverent bastards who keep at it to everyone's chagrin. Excited about the Higgs being here!!
14:10 not that point
💗💗💗💗💗.
Why was she inputting her opinion and unfunny jokes and when this was clearly not about her? She thought she had her own talk show lol
lol
BTW this lady is doing a horrible job
why ??
@@letshangout6359 says cringey and confrontational things