Its not, the F24 is a navy version of the fifth generation F22 with folding wings and other modifications for proposed carrier use by the US Navy, - but not adopted.
Did the USAF lose a couple F22 due to crashes? Are they just trying to hide this fact and trying to build and pay for an F24.? A decade is long time for the NGAD to keep being in design?
Parading everything around "boasting" when everything should be held top secret is counterproductive. Hey look what we got, lets see if you can match it. Very naive.
F-24? WHERE DID THIS COME FROM? YOUR VIDEO WAS CONFUSED BY SHOWING PLANES WITH AND WITHOUT TAILS, WHICH IS IT. I THOUGHT THAT THE TWO VERSIONS OF NG AD WERE TAILESS, AND DIDN'T HAVE AN F-NUMBER. THIS MISH-MASH WAS CONFUSING AND MISLEADING. I EXPECTED BETTER, CONSISTENT INFORMATION.
This is closely click bait because there is no F-24 but the other info is mostly correct except the F-117 was the first stealth fighter. Someone else said it looked similar to the F-23 and I agree. I sure there is a Gen 6 or even more advanced but we won’t see those for a few years. The only true stealth fighter/bombers are only in the USA because if Russia or China had them they would not be hiding those so called stealth planes out of public eye. We’ve all seen them on videos but never in person, Russia doesn’t even trust flying their in Ukraine’s because they know it’s not true stealth Abe will be shot down just like the rest of their fighters and helo’s. So neither Russia nor China has ever flown a combat mission in a so called stealth fighter but at least Russia has been in combat were as China hasn’t had a combat tested fighter in the Korean and Vietnamese war so their newer fighter pilots have never been in a dog fight so they’ve never been combat tested like the USA’s in real combat, so they/we don’t know how good theirs is but we all know ours is for real and will destroy them in short time just look at Ukraine to Russia
Simply redundant of other previous contents. Nothing new at all. Can they be fact checked? The TRUISM: military subjects invite attention, obviously views and income. You know contents lack depth and research is when the terms used are wrong, statements are ridiculous and all came from wikipedia or google. They make it look entertaining by showing pics or footages which are oftentimes unrelated or misplaced. Plagiarism is so weak in youtube or fb.
We have to remain ahead of our enemies.
Why is the narrator calling the f 22....the f24....?
From a USAF veteran, I knew there was no F24! But when I saw your first picture I thought oh yeah, that’s the little brother of the F48!
No such thing as F24
Is there an F-24?
ONLY showing F-22!
This guy is having a nightmare!!!
the F 22 has a less observability than the f 35
This does not appear to look like the other representations of the 6th generation fighter I have seen. There was no tail in every design.
Its not, the F24 is a navy version of the fifth generation F22 with folding wings and other modifications for proposed carrier use by the US Navy, - but not adopted.
..??? Game changer, it doesn’t exist 🤷🏽♂️
Bad ass plane for special missions
Plane may be f22 modified to accept newer technology but f24 doesn’t officially exist 23:17
Is this jet a concept. I don't believe it exists right now.
Build it!!!!!
The Plane must be much faster than other fighters and maintain a much longer range.
Thanks for your input! Speed and range are indeed vital aspects that make a fighter plane stand out.
What's funny is this jet looks like the F23
Did the USAF lose a couple F22 due to crashes? Are they just trying to hide this fact and trying to build and pay for an F24.? A decade is long time for the NGAD to keep being in design?
Don't fk with us ,we have the best...
Yeah yeah 😂😂😂 Israel’s ironic iron dome was supposedly touted as the best😂😂😂
Its so powerful I like it
The stealth technology started with F117 not F22
Parading everything around "boasting" when everything should be held top secret is counterproductive. Hey look what we got, lets see if you can match it. Very naive.
Get rid of the background music AKA noise.
F24 you're imagination
F23 is not dead
If you say so.
I m good job 👍💝💝💝
F-24? WHERE DID THIS COME FROM?
YOUR VIDEO WAS CONFUSED BY SHOWING PLANES WITH AND WITHOUT TAILS, WHICH IS IT.
I THOUGHT THAT THE TWO VERSIONS OF NG AD WERE TAILESS, AND DIDN'T HAVE AN F-NUMBER.
THIS MISH-MASH WAS CONFUSING AND MISLEADING. I EXPECTED BETTER, CONSISTENT INFORMATION.
All of this is total BS All of the pictures are of an F22 contracted in 2003. Look at the tail number....Just a lot of word salad.
I totally agree
This whole video is sponsored by a gamer company idiots
This is closely click bait because there is no F-24 but the other info is mostly correct except the F-117 was the first stealth fighter. Someone else said it looked similar to the F-23 and I agree. I sure there is a Gen 6 or even more advanced but we won’t see those for a few years. The only true stealth fighter/bombers are only in the USA because if Russia or China had them they would not be hiding those so called stealth planes out of public eye. We’ve all seen them on videos but never in person, Russia doesn’t even trust flying their in Ukraine’s because they know it’s not true stealth Abe will be shot down just like the rest of their fighters and helo’s. So neither Russia nor China has ever flown a combat mission in a so called stealth fighter but at least Russia has been in combat were as China hasn’t had a combat tested fighter in the Korean and Vietnamese war so their newer fighter pilots have never been in a dog fight so they’ve never been combat tested like the USA’s in real combat, so they/we don’t know how good theirs is but we all know ours is for real and will destroy them in short time just look at Ukraine to Russia
÷q 1112121weewq😊
Is this jet real or propaganda only? I assume this question like all others will not be answered?
Thanks for your comment! I appreciate your curiosity and will definitely explore this topic further in my next video!
Simply redundant of other previous contents. Nothing new at all. Can they be fact checked?
The TRUISM: military subjects invite attention, obviously views and income. You know contents lack depth and research is when the terms used are wrong, statements are ridiculous and all came from wikipedia or google. They make it look entertaining by showing pics or footages which are oftentimes unrelated or misplaced.
Plagiarism is so weak in youtube or fb.
Clips used over and over again.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣HOLYWOOD AMERICAN DREAM 🙃🙃🙃
BS mostly---Most of all these planes were not the plane in the title.
Likewise irrelevent in the less 6 Generation aircraft.
F23 was and is a better Fighter jet than the f22.The
choice was political and favoured Boeing.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍💚🦾
F22 not as good as the YF23
They cant keep up with the f22 no way there keep up with f24 trussia n china been over hyped for years ...
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👌👌👌👌👍👍👍👍
Bull
NGEN, (clok) 1+3=1