[Q/A] The Turkish Origins Of India's Partition | Abhijit Chavda | Khilafat Movement | Moplah Riot

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 305

  • @subhashtaing4641
    @subhashtaing4641 3 роки тому +204

    Abhijit sir looks much better now, having lost a lot of weight and with his hair grown long.

  • @chengappak.g.29
    @chengappak.g.29 4 роки тому +109

    At the age of 70 now things have become more clear to me..plenty of wrong information was given to people of India.hope at least now we should take correct political decisions.

    • @truthwar4567
      @truthwar4567 3 роки тому +9

      its awesome that u have the capability to change and realize so many other Indians of 60 plus are still Gandhi fans

    • @shivajiraje7555
      @shivajiraje7555 2 роки тому

      wow sir are u still alive?

    • @chengappak.g.29
      @chengappak.g.29 2 роки тому +1

      @@shivajiraje7555 why are you worried?

    • @perpetualprosperity2963
      @perpetualprosperity2963 2 роки тому +1

      We have no one to take corrective actions except ourselves. The majority indigenous Religion is treated like step-child in their own nation

    • @Maolana_ModiG
      @Maolana_ModiG 2 роки тому

      Propaganda warfare is part of war since millennia

  • @bhartiyasena9189
    @bhartiyasena9189 3 роки тому +59

    Abhijit chavda is really a great entry for dharmic forces he really giving big blows to lutyans

  • @gayatribrahma2323
    @gayatribrahma2323 4 роки тому +148

    A Hindu Rastra, for me. History need to be re-written. Constitution needs to be revised
    Gandhi was never supported Hindus.

    • @bijukarunakaran6256
      @bijukarunakaran6256 4 роки тому +16

      gayatri brahma Gandhi was a British agent, with Nerhu and Jinnah ,

    • @anupmeshram8047
      @anupmeshram8047 3 роки тому +4

      Fuck Gandhi

    • @TheB657
      @TheB657 3 роки тому +4

      @ No. Kaliyugic "Religion" concept itself is worst for Bharat. Now Taliban has just captured one nation. Wait till local state run madrasas turn into terror generation factories. Then Indians will know the difference between "Religion" (Organized faithfuls who plunder and bleed people) and Dharma.

    • @TheB657
      @TheB657 3 роки тому

      @ That is exactly the cause which requires popular support by the Bharatiya public. Islam propagated in its current form had 99 % influence of Salafism. Worse is that the Pasmanda or the Indian commoner whom had adopted this cultic doctrine, has no idea whatsoever of the content of the Qor'an. This is the truth. Forget Indians , I have worked with Bangladeshis and Indonesians in EU whom all had no idea of what it is ! The literal translation of the text is only known in full capacity by the Ashrafs or the well to do communities of Muslims whom have Arab, Persian or Near East Asian descent in India. The doctrine itself dictates to keep the *converts* away from the true knowledge. Moreover there are issues on the authenticity of the text itself since scholarly research have suggested the text to have been doctored around 800 years post the death of Muhammad. Additionally most of it's content is but a complete reflection of the earlier Bible and Torah with the addition of the political Islam which teaches subjugation of other beliefs, traditions and practices except itself. This is the one that terror groups *tend* to follow. In case of Afghanistan, it's taken to a new level of barbarism bereft of any organization.
      Similar would happen with proliferation of such an ideology. If you observe carefully, no Muslim will agree with their faith having an issue. On the other hand they might, as in my case my friend, openly accept the existence of the concept of "Sword of Islam" in its texts. That there is the blatant truth. You allow Abrahamics to grow , consider your civilization lost. Why other faiths, Abrahamics tend to be ultra critical to their own subdivisions and cast a glaring eye at any deviation from the abhorrent diktat they serve. Also reason why, pseudo - liberals are termed so to expose their support to a subjugation loving doctrine than true liberalism. Why India, US is at the front of these affairs. There's questionnaire during elections regarding whether Islam is really a concern ? ....

    • @rajdeepchakraborty9826
      @rajdeepchakraborty9826 2 роки тому +1

      @ Sadly, the Talibanis are the truest followers of Muhammad

  • @Sk_______
    @Sk_______ 4 роки тому +64

    Excellent unbiased Q n A session .. makes complete logical sense. Kudos to the effort 🙏🙏🙏

  • @shashidharshettar3846
    @shashidharshettar3846 3 роки тому +37

    Background: I’m a Bangalorean living in USA & I have a faculty friend from Turkey & I’m so delighted having known this history and I will share with my Turkish Friend in USA.

    • @shubhamsahu3590
      @shubhamsahu3590 3 роки тому +4

      @ALPER TÜRKMEN Nope. Turks are central Asians not Indians

    • @saiteja3437
      @saiteja3437 3 роки тому +3

      @ALPER TÜRKMEN people who are living in Turkey are Greeks and Armenians.....read the gene studies of people living in Turkey they are not at all related to Turks

    • @akashrao7496
      @akashrao7496 3 роки тому +4

      @ALPER TÜRKMEN well, one can say that a part of the Indian populace traces its origins to the Turkish invaders who in turn weren’t pure Turks as such since they had intermingled with other communities such as Iranians, Afghans, etc before coming to the Indian subcontinent. & moreover, the presence of Muslim Abyssinians (Siddis) in the Deccan meant further admixture with the local populace. India doesn’t & never had the so-called ‘pure race’/ genes’ thing.

    • @asadshariff
      @asadshariff 3 роки тому

      @@akashrao7496 Indians/Hindus are Dravidians like in Kerela or mixed Aaryans. God did not brand new Hindus on the sub continent from the sky. Indian Muslims have all kinds of blood depending on where they’re from. Mughal, Iranian, Turkish, Arabian and Indian. BJP/RSS is now all of a sudden creating Hinduvta based on alternate facts. How beautiful and peaceful it would be to create a mosaic of a tolerant/ accepting society in India. Look at Canada.Think!

    • @TheB657
      @TheB657 3 роки тому

      @ALPER TÜRKMEN 🤦‍♂️

  • @ashbohra1222
    @ashbohra1222 4 роки тому +32

    Very thought provoking, stimulating talk. Very well presented.

  • @armanoza9540
    @armanoza9540 4 роки тому +25

    Very insightful, logical and reasoned discussion. Looking forward to more such talks

  • @TheB657
    @TheB657 3 роки тому +31

    No other nation will tolerate such open speech about those considered as great leaders but in Bharat we can. Proud of being a Bharatiya and Sanatani 🙏

    • @yashrathod9685
      @yashrathod9685 3 роки тому +2

      and no nation will tolerate idiot and fake leader like gandhi to be called as mahatma and i am ashamed of that

    • @TheB657
      @TheB657 3 роки тому +1

      @@yashrathod9685 Very well struck on the truth. Thanks 🙏 If there had'nt been a "Ghandy" and more Maharana Prataps, we could have prevented manslaughter of millions of Bharatiyas and beheaded the devil called colonialism. It's a pity that 100 million odd on the entire Indian subcontinent tolerated meagre 10k to 100k of cowards who began calling themselves "kings of India"..... and as an icing on top of the cake we get a guy justifying brutal murders in name of "peace and equality"........ I hope there is a word in superlative that can describe this Evil and Devilish being.

    • @rahulvats95
      @rahulvats95 Рік тому

      In Congress era you would be jailed. Only recently it has changed m

  • @gajanangaundalkar6852
    @gajanangaundalkar6852 3 роки тому +20

    This is the result of not following the Mahabharata.....the Mahabharata is a big example that "vibhajan" doesn't work esp if one "ideology" wants to wipeout the other.

  • @AKHILESHVANAM
    @AKHILESHVANAM 4 роки тому +33

    Deconstructing Gandhi....and now the family who call themselves Gandhis

  • @ThePhysicist
    @ThePhysicist 4 роки тому +21

    My sincere thanks to Sangam Talks organizers. I have been gaining so much insight from your eminent speakers which I never did without your videos. Keep up the good work. How can I contribute to your efforts?

  • @ProfRavenSteel
    @ProfRavenSteel 4 роки тому +21

    Congratulations, srijan talks!!!
    Completed 500 videos
    Still a long journey to cover.
    Jai hind 🙏🚩🇮🇳

  • @prasadsivapurapu4242
    @prasadsivapurapu4242 4 роки тому +10

    There was an alternative to civil war and partition and that was the Cripps proposal. Sri Aurobindo was highly in favour of accepting the offer as he felt it would be benefit India in the long run. In fact, Sri Aurobindo, sent a personal attendant to Gandhi and the Congress leaders requesting them to accept the Cripps offer. In fact, Gandhi, arrogantly asked the attendant, if Sri Aurobindo had any standus loci as he had withdrawn from active politics a long time ago. Interested viewers may read Sri Aurobindo's views on why Cripps offer was good for India.

    • @VikramSingh-vg7gv
      @VikramSingh-vg7gv 4 роки тому

      Can you plz suggest Sri aurobindo's position on Cripps offer briefly.....

    • @anantambisht4895
      @anantambisht4895 3 роки тому

      Crips*?

    • @prasadsivapurapu4242
      @prasadsivapurapu4242 3 роки тому

      @@VikramSingh-vg7gv
      Sorry for the delay:
      Sending you a link which I hope will help you in in this regard:
      savitri.in/blogs/light-of-supreme/sri-aurobindo-and-the-cripps-proposals-of-1942

    • @prasadsivapurapu4242
      @prasadsivapurapu4242 3 роки тому

      @@anantambisht4895
      savitri.in/blogs/light-of-supreme/sri-aurobindo-and-the-cripps-proposals-of-1942
      Please read this if you want to know more about Cripp's proposal.

  • @shaangaming350
    @shaangaming350 2 роки тому +1

    I am shocked after seeing abhijit chavda sir , he look so different and it's only 2 year back video .

  • @sathya36
    @sathya36 3 роки тому +4

    Very good discussion, free and rational thinking, if these is done what would have happened, these discussion will free is our bondage of history

  • @sandeepranjanv702
    @sandeepranjanv702 2 роки тому +4

    Superb , valuable info, q&a session, of hidden history, and answers to the problems we face today, even 74 yrs post independence..liked the Turkish basis for partition history, thank you sir

  • @ska4666
    @ska4666 3 роки тому +12

    Dude i didn't knew Mr. Bose Had planned on 20 yrs dictatorship, ...that's freakin amazing foresight...
    _I myself had a self conflict about dictatorship within me, but i also knew for the fact that 90% people are delusional, n to take them out n save India's future, positivly forcefull methods were inevitable._
    Pfft!! You know, it's Funny if any worthy Leader does it now, all oppositions are gonna ravage & Criticize that leader in every possible way to stop the big change, to the point that they'll become like that damned Gandhi, _..Doing instant remedies while dumping the future of the nation on the back burner...._
    Hmph!! Reminds me of current politics played by despicable oppositions against the party in power, without even realizing the big picture.

  • @pardeepthakur6422
    @pardeepthakur6422 2 роки тому +3

    Abhijit is “ GENIUS “

  • @atish3024
    @atish3024 4 роки тому +21

    Forget about partition and independence just answer one question why did not Kings of Bharat come together from 1400 yrs when Muslims and Christians formed coalition and crusades ?

    • @catlover9865
      @catlover9865 4 роки тому +8

      Selfishness is inherent to nature 4 majority of this society. Those who stood against Invaders were ditched by traitors.
      we lothed the abilities of our neighbour, and start hating ourselve, even to the extent of destroying ourselve. Such things never allow one to act as group or collective entity.
      There r many theories by many historians, yet the common consensus is too much Pacifist nature, and inability to learn from past mistakes.
      These faults still exist in society, and we r yet to admit, n address it.

    • @catlover9865
      @catlover9865 4 роки тому +6

      @@redwoodthomas5943 IMO no other race has presented a more selfish character than Western White imperialists -- like United states nd Britain..
      Ur observations about Hindus is an exception and not a general fact. Also it is not relevant to the question, as it is from a very different time altogether -- hence it's a false equivalence.
      Not every Hindu is like that, as u mentioned... Though Marxist& Nehruvian Historians& academicians have brainwash many people in India and have inculcated lothe for their own culture, but generally we don't see a technical person taking any fake allegation whatsoever about our culture, irrespective of where they are.
      India give maximum Health & IT professionals to the world, and they do their work with happiness nd pride. They also get respect bcoz of their good behaviour. They don't do bomb blasts nd disobey the rules of the country where they stay.
      Also U should not forget the fact that Western media and academia has deep hindu antibiased and it has constantly fed a majority of western ppl with hate for Hindus. the Hindus in foreign countries know this, and so to save themselves from aggression of such ppl, sometimes they might choose to bear or ignore some rants.
      Mostly Hindus r benevolent nd kind in nature, and r also very intelligent, as compared to global average, so our ppl try to avoid any sort of confrontation with strangers in foreign countries, which can bring unnecessary trouble 4 them .
      Medieval & Ancient India were very different, at that we didn't go anywhere for education nd Job but the students from world were coming to our universities for education. India was leading exporter of goods for Europe, and had trade relations with almost every civilisation.
      I suggest u to read books, rather than being somuch opinionated about things after some coincidental encounters.
      Thank u.

    • @gunnaravinderreddy5294
      @gunnaravinderreddy5294 4 роки тому +2

      Islam is only 1500 years old and Christians are 2000 years, no convertion before this period... Naturally kings fight for expansion...East india permitted church into India in 1720 & Macaulay english started fm 1820...

    • @gunnaravinderreddy5294
      @gunnaravinderreddy5294 4 роки тому

      @PatrickMCcolley what is the necessity to be together like other faiths Christians/ Islam, we have no motives to convert and occupy other areas....divided we stand, we don't show off....

    • @rudrajeet814
      @rudrajeet814 3 роки тому +1

      Rajputs supported mughals as well as british
      We mustn't forget that ...

  • @harekrishnak1437
    @harekrishnak1437 4 роки тому +13

    Gandhi actually was about allow corridor for. PAK to bangladesh (East Bengal) on 1feb 1948 which could not hapen otherwise today India would have been in trouble

    • @catlover9865
      @catlover9865 4 роки тому +5

      Sir, to talk about Gandhi's defacts is a sin in this country nowadays. Only person u can abuse and move away is Savarkar. Critical discussions are no more encouraged. The travesty is even the current NDA government is more proactively pushing Gandhi than anyone b4.

    • @fortune4302
      @fortune4302 4 роки тому +8

      @@catlover9865 NOT NDA,,ONLY MODI JI IS DOING THAT,,TRUST ME THERE IS A HIDDEN KOOTNITI CHANAKYA NITI TO DO THAT,, REMEMBER,,TO DESTROY SOME FRAUD CULT FIGURE OR FAKE DISILLUSIONED HYPOCRITE CROOK BETRAYER,,DECEPTOR,, UNTOUCHABLE ICON,,U FIRST BUILD SOMEONE TO TAKE IT TO MAXIMUM HEIGHT & THEN SHAKE & THROW IT FROM THAT HEIGHT TO BREAK THIS FALSE STATUS FIGURE PERMANENTLY TO EXPOSE THE HIDDEN TRUTH & TO AWAKE ,,ALERT THE LONG SLEEPING,, IGNORANT PEOPLE & INTOXICATED ORDINARY FOOL'S... THAT'S THE DEPTH OF KOOTNITI & COMPLEXITY OF POLITICS THAT NAIVE PERSON'S LIKE US CAN'T UNDERSTAND...SO DON'T BE DISAPPOINTED,, SAVARKAR WILL GET HIS RIGHTFUL PLACE & WILL BE WORSHIPED IN COMING FUTURE BCOZ I M GUARANTING U THAT ONLY BHAJAPA WILL REMAIN IN CENTER POWER TILL 2050 & BEYOND THAT,, CORRUPT FRAUD CROOK COMMUNISTS LEFTISTS CONGRESS PARTY WILL NEVER COME TO POWER NOW,,WHO DESTROYED SAVARKAR,,PATEL,,BOSE,, AMBEDKAR,, BHAGAT SINGH BY CONSPIRACY...NEXT COMING DECADE WILL BE FULL OF LOT OF CHAOS & UTHAL-PUTHAL...BUT MODI JI WILL BE P.M. TILL 2029,,FIRST MODI JI WILL DESTROY INDIA'S & HINDU'S EXTERNAL & INTERNAL TWO BIGGEST ENEMY (1) ISLAMIC PAKISTAN ,,THEN HE WILL MAKE INDIA STRONG CAPABLE POWERFUL ENOUGH TO DESTROY ENEMY (2) COMMUNIST CHINA & AFTER THAT IN SAB INTERNAL MAKKAR GADDAR COMMUNISTS LEFTISTS JEHADI ISLAMISTS DUSHMANO KO MITANE INKA BAAP AA RAHA HAI,,JO INHE ZINDA GAADH DEGA...THIS IS 100% CERTAIN,,IN 2029 YOGI JI WILL BE P.M. FOR 25 YEAR'S TILL 2054,,& HE WILL CREATE THE DESTINY OF DHARMIC BHARAT,,HE WILL PROTECT OUR ANCIENT DHARMIC CIVILIZATION & HONOUR OUR TRUE RASHTRABHAKT HEROES LIKE SAVARKAR,,BOSE,,ETC...HE WILL FINISH ALL INTERNAL CANCER COMMUNISTS & ISLAMISTS FROM BHARAT DESH & MAKE IT A TRUE SANATAN HINDU DHARMIC NATION GREAT BHARAT...THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN DEFINITELY... WHOLE BHARAT & U WILL SEE IT FROM YR OWN EYE'S IN NEAR COMING FUTURE... THAT'S THE REAL FINAL TRUTH... NAMASTE JAI BHARAT JAI HIND...

    • @buddhavivekanand7462
      @buddhavivekanand7462 4 роки тому +2

      An Australian Evangelist on a flight with a retired army Major acquittance told him that M.K.Gandhi was a Crypto Christian who converted before coming to India in 1915.. like Pandita Ramabai... The British propped them up to finish the Hindutva forces... His many Anti-Hindu action proves this point.. & Both Converted Traitors died horrible death..

    • @km99999
      @km99999 4 роки тому

      Gopinath, what ref.???

    • @anantambisht4895
      @anantambisht4895 3 роки тому

      @@fortune4302 i support bjp for now but i dont think they understand the essence of hinduism. They womt be able to protect it

  • @abhibittu16
    @abhibittu16 4 роки тому +9

    War can make you Winner or Looser but for sure it will make you Awake and Alert which we lack today in Indians 🙏

  • @shashidharshettar3846
    @shashidharshettar3846 3 роки тому +4

    I sent a message to my “Turkish” friend of mine-a Bangalorean living in USA

  • @crazyscience190
    @crazyscience190 4 роки тому +4

    The answer to the question of lady, and today's situation is only one fight until you make the things right. Even if our single person is survived, atlast and atleast he will get the better future as per kurukshetra.

  • @JamdaagneyaKaashyapa
    @JamdaagneyaKaashyapa 3 роки тому +3

    Too Good !!!!!!

  • @jsb7225
    @jsb7225 4 роки тому +6

    Lokmanya Tilak had agreed to provide Indian soldiers during world war in exchange for poorna swaraj. And Gandhi had agreed for similar help in return for Dominion status. Is this true?

  • @saxena_saab1044
    @saxena_saab1044 3 роки тому +5

    My favorite teacher

  • @rajasmuley
    @rajasmuley 3 роки тому +5

    People associated with Congress and having non English education like Tilak,Lala Lajpat Rai,Dr Hedgewar later on moved away from Congress and made their impact more regional than national. Though RSS later grew to be a national movement, but as a country we did not have option to congress as a leading organisation.

  • @spaceagegeocon4880
    @spaceagegeocon4880 4 роки тому +10

    Had there been a civil war then you would not be able to see today's map of India. India would have been split into many small countries/republics.

    • @punyashloka4946
      @punyashloka4946 3 роки тому

      Thats because we are scared of war a strong country is built by sacrificing bloods of millions. The partition take millions of lives but solve nothing.

    • @spaceagegeocon4880
      @spaceagegeocon4880 3 роки тому

      @@punyashloka4946 Dear Madam/Sir how ridiculous you sound. Your statement suggests that you want to have civil war instead of independence of India as a one nation what India is today. You may be scared but not everyone so sir/madam. Moreover, dying for no or frivolous causes is stupidity. You please, rather watch the way the nation is moving towards darkness due to worthless, selfish, fascist leaders action. And if you can do something to stop that it will be the best thing to do.

    • @hustler212
      @hustler212 3 роки тому +4

      You mean the same way Kashmir was going to be separated from India after subjugation of Article 370...
      The only thing needed for a change is strong will power. Darpok kabhi jang nahi jeette.

    • @NOBODY-j7z
      @NOBODY-j7z 3 роки тому

      @@spaceagegeocon4880 independence came before the partition and civil war would be better rather than people suffering everyday

    • @spaceagegeocon4880
      @spaceagegeocon4880 3 роки тому

      @@NOBODY-j7z My Dear friend -- Do you understand what you are talking about? Do you have any idea about civil war, I mean by studying world's history (with peer reviewed publications -- not by "murkh andh bhakt" who believes in whatsapp university). What independence you are talking about? Please be clear. Your statement "independence came before the partition" does not carry any meanings unless you state categorically. Just for the heck of replying please do not reply. Please think in clear mind and read a lot.

  • @truthwar4567
    @truthwar4567 3 роки тому +4

    they never wanted to "SOLVE" any problems but create a continuous problem for generation to come

  • @sachindranathdolai9509
    @sachindranathdolai9509 4 роки тому +8

    Sangam should have a billion subscribers

  • @dublinhomes1951
    @dublinhomes1951 3 роки тому +7

    Two Nation Theory was to separate Muslims in Pakistan and all other religions in India, why are their biggest numbers of Muslims in India? I'll keep my share aside and let's equally share from yours, is't that injustice? How is it fair?

    • @anantambisht4895
      @anantambisht4895 3 роки тому +4

      Ambedkar wanted full population transfer from.India to pakistan of muslims but Gandhi opposed it and said if muslims want to remain here they can

    • @NOBODY-j7z
      @NOBODY-j7z 3 роки тому +2

      Partition is still not completed most of the muslims never went to pakistan where as Hindus in Afghanistan and Pakistan are on verge of extinction.

  • @1492kishan
    @1492kishan 4 роки тому +9

    Thank you for documenting all these despicable people.

  • @shashankyadava5502
    @shashankyadava5502 3 роки тому +5

    Bharat needs more of real and true Historians to expose the false history being taught for generations so that people should understand the propoganda and how we are fooled . We should start listening and reading more about true heroes and not the fake ones. This is crucial to make a strong nation

  • @sanatshah3993
    @sanatshah3993 4 роки тому +11

    Gandhi was no Mahatma. He was the smartest politician of his time; smarter than Nehru,Jinnah and Patel combined. When he returned to India he realised that it would be futile to ask the Indians to take up arms and fight for independence and that Bose was doomed to fail. He understood the Indian mind and decided non violence and non cooperation was a better option. This even prompted Churchill to say, “How do u fight a people that never fight back”. The rest is history.

  • @blitzpark1250
    @blitzpark1250 3 роки тому +1

    Intelligent set of people there, very articulate. Round of Applause

  • @c.nbhaskar4718
    @c.nbhaskar4718 3 роки тому +6

    i like abhijeet chavda

  • @sahilandonkar
    @sahilandonkar 3 роки тому +4

    I want to see more Q&A like this

  • @shimmy332
    @shimmy332 Рік тому

    Great talk up to a certain point, quite mesmerizing, then turns into a religious viewpoint narrative.

  • @gunnaravinderreddy5294
    @gunnaravinderreddy5294 4 роки тому +7

    During 1947 it was the PM's post which mattered, Nehru,Jinnah both wanted to be PM's, but Cong voted for Sardar patel, which led to Islamic pak & hindu India, Nehru was PM for india with Secularism/ Minorities to get votes, Jinnah PM for Pak and rest is history...the 2 Cong leaders messed India and only after 2000 AD, India started voting differently, so came Modiji after 2014...

    • @anantambisht4895
      @anantambisht4895 3 роки тому

      People voted for patel not nehru.

    • @Unfollowthem
      @Unfollowthem 3 роки тому +1

      You are wrong... When did Muslim Demand Pakistan is matter.. who mentioned separate Muslim country ,, check out origin not In 1947... Around 20 years back it was created in Muslim mind...

    • @gunnaravinderreddy5294
      @gunnaravinderreddy5294 3 роки тому

      @@Unfollowthem iUML formed in 1920, since then they wanted to separate from india ...

    • @Unfollowthem
      @Unfollowthem 3 роки тому

      @@gunnaravinderreddy5294 Yes sir... but you Mentioned PM post which Mattered.. it is also right but their dream is to rule whole India once again...

    • @gunnaravinderreddy5294
      @gunnaravinderreddy5294 3 роки тому +2

      @@Unfollowthem No chance' 400 years back a sage Potuliri Veera bramham garu" Kadapa in AP, wrote future like Nostra domas' Summary" Hindus will have set back from muslims, will over come, NO threat for hinduism...wrote...had the changes Not happened in 2014??? things were totally different

  • @ashutoshpandey2043
    @ashutoshpandey2043 Рік тому

    This is a better way...An Interactive session..

  • @Rohitsdiaries
    @Rohitsdiaries 4 роки тому +4

    Wonderful discussion

  • @jituramawat7218
    @jituramawat7218 2 роки тому

    That was very much constructive approach to the historical facts regarding that bald fellow who was not really mahatma.. I was almost had doubtful perception about him and now it's crystal clear.. Einstein had opinions about Indians that our ideas our thinkings last up to 15mins.. I wonder what kinda people he met, they were surely either gandhis or nehruvians. I am stunned by Abhijit sir's broad spectrum of knowledge.

  • @jasminpatel3416
    @jasminpatel3416 2 роки тому +1

    Wow. Why didn't I find this sooner?

  • @atenashram105
    @atenashram105 3 роки тому +15

    india now ...since the BJP came into power india became netaji's india

    • @yashrathod9685
      @yashrathod9685 3 роки тому +2

      no for that we have to go more long

    • @hiteshgujarathi4636
      @hiteshgujarathi4636 2 роки тому +3

      No BJP want india become Veer Savarkars india. Which is more powerful and more efficient than netaji could have even thought.

  • @yugalsharan
    @yugalsharan 4 роки тому +7

    Gandhi is the biggest Propaganda that every political dispensation wants to use for their own narrative of colonialism. I am amazed at what RSS is doing with glorifying MK Gandhi and sidelining Savarkar. Heavy collusion with Congress & Foreign Colonial Masters.

    • @anantambisht4895
      @anantambisht4895 3 роки тому +1

      Rss should promote savarkar as foremost. Rss bikk chuke hai

  • @user04367a
    @user04367a Рік тому +1

    The muslim league supported Partition on Bengal by Britishers in 1905, instead of supporting Indians and Swadeshi movement. They preferred Turkey Khalifa over India, also caused Moplah riots to establish khalifa in Kerala.
    What a nationalist background!!!

  • @MyronidesVideo
    @MyronidesVideo 2 роки тому +2

    Nothing said makes Mahatma look smaller in my eyes. Good to discuss about his grave mistakes, though. We can all learn from past naivity.

    • @Wen25h
      @Wen25h Рік тому +1

      He was an British puppet .

  • @duhduh666
    @duhduh666 4 місяці тому

    10:20 I am going back to my memory from the 80s and referring to long deceased Congress men. The argument, Jinnah was the ideal candidate to argue for dominion status offered by the Brit’s. If it would have succeeded we would have had phased freedom sooner. No partition. Jinnah as leader you may ask. The counter so what he was an opportunist then basking a Hindu Muslim bridge. He would have led well.

  • @atenashram105
    @atenashram105 3 роки тому +3

    i prefer be a good assasin than a bad priest

  • @caarvaak
    @caarvaak Рік тому

    MKG is still a fiat-as in Economics. PM Modi eulogises him.
    Karl Marx mentioned two-nation theory in his book _The Eastern Question_ in 1853. Karl Marx understood Muslims and Islam better than he knew Hindoos.

  • @shanu7uday
    @shanu7uday 4 роки тому +3

    Hope Mr. N.D.Modi is that right person for India !

  • @Rahul-hn4ll
    @Rahul-hn4ll 3 роки тому +2

    Our nation Bharat only exists,if we believe in Brahma-Vishnu-Mahesh,where,Brahma-Vishnu-Mahesh,Saptarishi,Amavasu dynasty,Ramayana,Mahabharata would be only a story,if we are unable to link each one of them together. So, out of 07 saptarishis/Brahmarishis,six being sons of god Brahma were Brahmarishi by birth and Vishwamitra/Kaushik is the only human being,who was originally a shatriya king of Amavasu dynasty and was given recognition of Brahmarishi by god Brahma himself. So saptarishi gets linked authenticity with Brahma-Vishnu-Mahesh. Then,Vishwamitra/Kaushik also appeared in Ramayana. Also,Bharat king,the descendants of pandavs/kauravas was son of dushyant king and mother Shakuntla, where Shakuntla was daughter of Kaushik/Vishwamitra,so Mahabharata truthfulness is also justified. So,Brahma-Vishnu-Mahesh,Saptarishi,Amavasu dynasty,Ramayana & Mahabharata are as true as we are alive today in our country named Bharat,as Vishwamitra/Kaushik binds them together with full authenticity in any point of our nation Bharat. Aryans,dravidians are just propaganda of few people who have their personal interests above National heritage interests. Great job done by u all. Keep it up.

  • @ॐSrimanArcharyaJBC
    @ॐSrimanArcharyaJBC 3 роки тому +2

    The Turkish people didn’t even know who I am let alone think that they where part of the international boarders that my own family created and drew to make countries. @🕉🔺➕

  • @anupambanerjee4718
    @anupambanerjee4718 2 роки тому +3

    Partition is probably the only thing I would ever support Gandhi for. But for it, imagine how difficult it would be to contain those many hostile creatures that are Pakistanis today, operating from within the state, enjoying total support from the leftist 'secular' brigade, funded by foreign outfits...makes me shudder as to how much more mayhem that would have led to.

  • @NOBODY-j7z
    @NOBODY-j7z 3 роки тому +7

    #हिंदूराष्ट्र जरूरी है

  • @nilotpalsarmahsarma8344
    @nilotpalsarmahsarma8344 3 роки тому +2

    Nice Sir

  • @suchitraraghavan1330
    @suchitraraghavan1330 3 роки тому +2

    We will have to wait for Yogiji to rewrite history textbooks.

  • @adwaitsingh222
    @adwaitsingh222 4 роки тому +3

    Civil war seriously ?? Don't u think we already lost so many people in riots??

    • @NOBODY-j7z
      @NOBODY-j7z 3 роки тому +4

      We lost more people in day to day conflicts than in riots.
      A civil war would be better than people suffering everyday.

    • @rudrajeet814
      @rudrajeet814 3 роки тому

      Our civil war go extended in the form of terrorism from Pakistan..
      What is ghazwa e hind?
      And it's unending

  • @talksensenobcplzzz2043
    @talksensenobcplzzz2043 2 роки тому

    So in the nutshell we're fighting an impossible battle.
    🤔

  • @Gigachad7022
    @Gigachad7022 2 роки тому +1

    Bruhh he looks so different now....

  • @aditimukherjee1572
    @aditimukherjee1572 2 роки тому +1

    We got independence for the person ...is Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose...

  • @rajadahir2066
    @rajadahir2066 3 роки тому +2

    Where is young generation.

  • @mmo2984
    @mmo2984 Рік тому

    AtaTurk served his country and Islam well. He integrated Islam to Turkey’s culture which helped to sustain both with balance and is evident. Islam allows that to happen to any nation. The countries have adopted and integrated Islam to their culture or vice versa sustain both very well.

  • @harekrishnak1437
    @harekrishnak1437 4 роки тому +8

    One way Pakistan formed in 1947 is good for Indians otherwise with these selfish congress politicians and militants of pak China would have ruled us economicaly

    • @sureshp.s.1410
      @sureshp.s.1410 4 роки тому

      ABS and could have been exported from India forcefully

    • @SZAS1978
      @SZAS1978 4 роки тому

      @@Nil-kd9wz I am glad at least you spoke the truth. All through I have been hearing that Hindus wanted a unified India.

  • @maruthi-ve3dt
    @maruthi-ve3dt 4 роки тому +4

    ignore word watch the action

  • @md.khaledhussain436
    @md.khaledhussain436 2 роки тому +1

    When India was last time united?

    • @mananchopra6519
      @mananchopra6519 2 роки тому +6

      Mauryas ashoka guptas marathas etc etc

    • @mananchopra6519
      @mananchopra6519 2 роки тому +3

      Even during akbars rule

    • @Wen25h
      @Wen25h Рік тому +1

      Under Ashoka , Guptas , mauriyas .

    • @Thatonlyone678
      @Thatonlyone678 Місяць тому

      Before gibberish was invented to all nonsense ppl

  • @ac_te_c_
    @ac_te_c_ 2 роки тому

    British were gathering intelligence for people, faith, culture and traditions since 17th Century, what our leader could not understand the geopolitical factors, most important Tibet, Nehru could not comprehend the near future. He was one man Prime Minister, conspicuous to desaster.

  • @shubhamdavey
    @shubhamdavey 2 роки тому

    Gandhi wanted to avoid Civil War hence did nothing but be vocal about his disagreement of partition, but somewhere he surely knew that Civil War is inevitable (which turned out to be true) still silently did nothing & let the British ruin the independence as well.

  • @araashmehta7719
    @araashmehta7719 3 роки тому +2

    I don't think Gandhi changed his mind as a leader.l his mindset was set. I'm sure this is what he thought:
    Well, I have fought under the British Crown, and they have fought valiant wars. It is valiant to fight under the Crown, and whenever the Crown needs people should join them. However, they should not subjugate the Indian people, as they have their own culture. Indians should not fight violently with the British as they have their cultute of 'non-violence'. Almost like a parent telling the older child 'you're more mature than than the younger one, you're older so you know better'. So under the British Crown you can fight violently because that's how they do it, and Indians must always remain in peace, calm, and fight non-violently. So his allegiance is to both: British and India, in a way. He considered both of them to be his brother and sister.

    • @akashrao7496
      @akashrao7496 3 роки тому

      Interesting outlook.

    • @SuperMan-zo6ns
      @SuperMan-zo6ns 3 роки тому +1

      Bullshits ! Gandhi is coward and gay who love British and Muslims even after they kill and rape millions of Hindus! Your opinion is stupid like Gandhi

  • @alaypatel6050
    @alaypatel6050 2 роки тому +2

    One thing u have to attribute to gandi. He knew his target group very well. Hindus can never a leader that is other than gandi. People only get in a leader that is their cumulative sum of qualities. Gandi is a mirror to hindu consciousness or to put it right, lack of consciousness.

  • @spaceagegeocon4880
    @spaceagegeocon4880 4 роки тому +3

    Partition has become a reality and India has celebrated 74th independence day. Would you please think beyond that. Ataturk's model Turkey is no longer existing now

    • @TheB657
      @TheB657 3 роки тому +2

      If one is ignorant about their history , one cannot appreciate the present or experience the difference. There is "every" reason why this should be discussed. By the way in which discussion, debate, education etc. is Gandhi's negative put forward ?

    • @spaceagegeocon4880
      @spaceagegeocon4880 3 роки тому

      @@TheB657 Dear Mr. Subramaniam, Instead of giving me a lecture about the necessity of reading history, I suggest you better be educated with world history. Please do not restrict one or two text books available in India (where hindutuva is glorified), rather read more books and peer reviewed journals. This rant which has been depicted in the video only helps in lowering the esteem of the religion in particular and the nation in general.

    • @Wen25h
      @Wen25h Рік тому

      In your Pakistan sUicide b0mbing is glorified along regime change .

  • @rameshiyer1
    @rameshiyer1 4 роки тому +7

    Though Mohandas Gandhi had his virtues, he had his share of vices too. But our history books written by leftist crony historians on Congress party's payroll whitewashed the vices of both Gandhi and Nehru, and later Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as well. Mohandas Gandhi owes his exalted status in India's modern history and contemporary India. Wish our current Govt had the guts to rewrite our history books and give due credit and recognition to various other leaders of our freedom movement, particularly those not in the Congress camp dominated by Gandhi & Nehru. In fact, I feel Mohandas Gandhi was the most hypocritical politician of his times, and for his stature he could've very well protested India's Partition. He should be held morally responsible for the Hindu n Sikh genocide following India's Partition in 1947. Instead India celebrates Mohandas Gandhi as FOTN. In fact, he should be seen as FOTN of Pakistan, as but for his non-intervention to prevent India's Partition, there would be no Pakistan. India existed as a country n a nation several millennia before Mohandas Gandhi was even born.

    • @rameshiyer1
      @rameshiyer1 4 роки тому +2

      @@Nil-kd9wz As Mr Chavda said if Gandhi indeed had to choose between a potential civil / communal war between Hindus n Muslims, and Partition, he should have taken a chance with the former, like Abraham Lincoln did in USA. That way, it would have created a stronger United India or a disintegrated one. We are anyway heading for a disintegrated India or an Islamic Republic of India in a couple of decades, if not earlier.

    • @rameshiyer1
      @rameshiyer1 4 роки тому

      @@Nil-kd9wz Gandhi's non-violence was a charade. He didn't once object to Indians joining British army to fight for British victory but opposed revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, Azad, or even Subhash Chandra Bose n INA which was fighting for India's freedom, and was the real reason the British left India. We need a total overhaul of our history books.

    • @fortune4302
      @fortune4302 4 роки тому +1

      @@Nil-kd9wz THEN U BETTER FIRST EDUCATE YOURSELF & WELL INFORMED BEFORE OPENING YR MOUTH ABOUT THE BIGGEST FRAUD & DECEPTION WITH INDIA & HINDUS CALLED HYPOCRITE COMMUNIST LEFTIST GANDHI,,A TRUE BRITISH PLANTED STOOGE AGENT TO FOOL & DECIEVE BHARAT & HINDUS TILL THE LAST MOMENT...

    • @fortune4302
      @fortune4302 4 роки тому +1

      I M GUARANTING U THAT ONLY BHAJAPA WILL REMAIN IN CENTER POWER TILL 2050 & BEYOND THAT,, CORRUPT FRAUD CROOK COMMUNISTS LEFTISTS CONGRESS PARTY WILL NEVER COME TO POWER NOW,,WHO DESTROYED SAVARKAR,,PATEL,,BOSE,, AMBEDKAR,, BHAGAT SINGH BY CONSPIRACY...NEXT COMING DECADE WILL BE FULL OF LOT OF CHAOS & UTHAL-PUTHAL...BUT MODI JI WILL BE P.M. TILL 2029,,FIRST MODI JI WILL DESTROY INDIA'S & HINDU'S EXTERNAL & INTERNAL TWO BIGGEST ENEMY (1) ISLAMIC PAKISTAN ,,THEN HE WILL MAKE INDIA STRONG CAPABLE POWERFUL ENOUGH TO DESTROY ENEMY (2) COMMUNIST CHINA & AFTER THAT IN SAB INTERNAL MAKKAR GADDAR COMMUNISTS LEFTISTS JEHADI ISLAMISTS DUSHMANO KO MITANE INKA BAAP AA RAHA HAI,,JO INHE ZINDA GAADH DEGA...THIS IS 100% CERTAIN,,IN 2029 YOGI JI WILL BE P.M. FOR 25 YEAR'S TILL 2054,,& HE WILL CREATE THE DESTINY OF DHARMIC BHARAT,,HE WILL PROTECT OUR ANCIENT DHARMIC CIVILIZATION & HONOUR OUR TRUE RASHTRABHAKT HEROES LIKE SAVARKAR,,BOSE,,ETC...HE WILL FINISH ALL INTERNAL CANCER COMMUNISTS & ISLAMISTS FROM BHARAT DESH & MAKE IT A TRUE SANATAN HINDU DHARMIC NATION GREAT BHARAT...THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN DEFINITELY... WHOLE BHARAT & U WILL SEE IT FROM YR OWN EYE'S IN NEAR COMING FUTURE... THAT'S THE REAL FINAL TRUTH... NAMASTE JAI BHARAT JAI HIND...

    • @rameshiyer1
      @rameshiyer1 4 роки тому +1

      @@Nil-kd9wz Yes, many flaws of both MKG n Nehru have been hidden from public knowledge by crony historians on Congress payroll since 1947. You may check a letter by Nathuram Godse written during his last days, in which he's explained why he killed Gandhi. Some say there was a conspiracy to kill Gandhi anyway (by Nehru, say some).

  • @tamaldebnath7473
    @tamaldebnath7473 4 роки тому

    Nice video

  • @madhavraj1650
    @madhavraj1650 4 роки тому +14

    Bc of indian muslims millions of algerians died

    • @madhavraj1650
      @madhavraj1650 4 роки тому +6

      Bc of khilfat movement turki wants to be secular but indian muslim say we want turkey to be muslim

  • @suppiahmurugesan8343
    @suppiahmurugesan8343 2 роки тому

    We need the likes of Subash Chandra Bose or Lee Kuan Yew for the next 10 years, at least, for Bharat. Benevolent dictatorial leadership.

  • @कश्परैना
    @कश्परैना 3 роки тому +2

    🙏🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @maverick6062
    @maverick6062 2 роки тому +1

    Wow abhijit sir lost a lot of weight

  • @kaynin1089
    @kaynin1089 3 роки тому +2

    So attaturk is the better leader and as he said leaders should take actions right. Then why not abolish Hinduism and all religions from India. This will also make our bronze age old traditions go away as well. This is not thought provoking, this is misleading.

    • @shubhamsahu3590
      @shubhamsahu3590 3 роки тому +4

      Attaturk didn't abolish Islam but reformed it. We can do the same.

    • @Wen25h
      @Wen25h Рік тому

      Ataturk didn't banned Islam, Christianity.

  • @ahmedopone4080
    @ahmedopone4080 Рік тому

    Wasn't partition better for a Hindu nation? Why be against partition but then call for a Hindu Rastra?

  • @computerscience2854
    @computerscience2854 2 роки тому

    I feel Babu Rajendra Prasad also good..........

  • @jaikr.6695
    @jaikr.6695 2 роки тому +1

    Abhijit sir looked like a smart professor 😅.A person's knowledge cannot be judged by his looks .

  • @SarvavidBhavati
    @SarvavidBhavati 2 роки тому

    It was like crisis of scarcity of leadership, so jo mile kaam chalalo situation, that's why 'the' Gandhi🙆

  • @duhduh666
    @duhduh666 4 місяці тому

    3:45 Gandhi was virtue signaling and was pretending to be against the partition. I’m wary of anyone trying to read the mind of someone about events nearly a century ago and answer with such certainty.

  • @st-rw7pv
    @st-rw7pv 4 роки тому +1

    Biased against Gandhi is so apparent in the comments and the presenter! All can have their views and interpretations!
    What is totally illogical is comparing Lincoln with Gandhi! Lincoln had an army under his command, Gandhi didn't; even if Congress had chosen civil war Hindus would have come out worse, as Britishers weren't interested in participation and most of Indian army were Muslims! India would have Balkanized and millions MORE killed.
    Partition was a logical choice IMO.

    • @st-rw7pv
      @st-rw7pv 4 роки тому

      @ä Hindu community wasn't weak; actually it would have come out ahead in most of India. However the process would have been chaotic costing millions of lives and the outcome unpredictable. Partition allowed unified territories for both West Pakistan and India and then both could focus on the Princely states unification (which was done within 1-2 years) and then proceed on.

  • @vineetasingh8112
    @vineetasingh8112 2 роки тому +2

    👍👍🙏

  • @parthapratimbagchiitsjustd1651
    @parthapratimbagchiitsjustd1651 3 роки тому +1

    Audio is very bad.

  • @haldjos1548
    @haldjos1548 3 роки тому +11

    Nathuram godse was great patriot.... Jai hind

    • @666drups
      @666drups 3 роки тому +4

      Many people don't know but if it wasn't for Shri Godse then Bharat would have been further divided with the north being taken as pisslamic land.

    • @anantambisht4895
      @anantambisht4895 3 роки тому +3

      @@666drups true

  • @revathip6034
    @revathip6034 3 роки тому

    Yes as long as the text books keeps telling lies.

  • @l...6954
    @l...6954 2 роки тому +1

    The #HindutvaTerrorism is reason behind partition

  • @anikettripathi7991
    @anikettripathi7991 4 роки тому

    No one works against own inclination and agendas.

  • @unitedtraders6905
    @unitedtraders6905 Рік тому

    All the people in audiance and lecturer are with same agenda.

  • @rashmiwadhwa7530
    @rashmiwadhwa7530 2 роки тому +1

    Time to remove mahatma term

  • @bountifulish
    @bountifulish 4 роки тому +2

    I found the audience more informed than the speaker. Speaker could not give clear views on a number of issue. I would have liked to see him answer questions more elaborately and direct.

  • @vienna30002000
    @vienna30002000 4 роки тому

    Who killed actually Gandhi?????

  • @dhiveshjoshi1950
    @dhiveshjoshi1950 3 роки тому

    25k views/ 130,00,00k ~ 0.00001
    We need explosion.

  • @evzaka
    @evzaka 4 роки тому +2

    They support to killer of Gandhi wow.

  • @highbury4life899
    @highbury4life899 2 роки тому +4

    Abhijit Chavda looks like Boman Irani in this video.

  • @mahavirprasadjain1751
    @mahavirprasadjain1751 3 роки тому +2

    Keeping Kashmir with india was a mistake , which created and is a reason for un ending conflict with Pakistan.
    Kashmir will remain a increasing problem for india , indefinitely. ( With apologie )

    • @TheB657
      @TheB657 3 роки тому +7

      Sir sorry to barge in but I wish to present another view - " Even if Kashmir wasn't with India, the fights would never cease, Islamists will fight with you for Punjab and Haryana, Himachal Pradesh. Later the entire nation. Kashmir is just the tip of the iceberg. The main question ramains.

    • @anantambisht4895
      @anantambisht4895 3 роки тому +5

      Dude Kashmir was never an issue. It was just an excuse. Ij reality pakistan wants whole of India. The history they teach in their schools is propesterous and false.

    • @Unfollowthem
      @Unfollowthem 3 роки тому +2

      You are wrong bro....It is just a week war... We can finish it. But we don't go with Violence.. that's it... With blood we have easy solution... Blame Nehru he was useless.. not others..

    • @anantambisht4895
      @anantambisht4895 3 роки тому +1

      @@Unfollowthem true

    • @thorodinson8900
      @thorodinson8900 3 роки тому +1

      @@Unfollowthem yes but it can cause bloodshed that's why we keep defensive mode on Kashmir issue and yes the so called post independence prime minister was useless

  •  3 роки тому +1

    Gandhi couldn't hv done something

    • @NOBODY-j7z
      @NOBODY-j7z 3 роки тому +1

      He was agent of Britishers
      His words were different from his actions
      Colonization messed up india to the core.