The documentary did manage to answer the question that gets asked constantly, "Why should it take 2 years or more to issue the findings in the report?" What people fail to realise is that it's not simply a question of pointing to something that went wrong; It's eliminating a thousand things that might have led to what ultimately led to the crash.. The cause behind the cause, behind the cause.
Yes there is rarely a crash that has a single cause. There is always an entire sequence of things going wrong that must align perfectly to cause a crash. This one was no different.
@@pooryorick831 Indeed!! Disasters don't just happen, they're a chain of critical events. Unravel the clues and count down those final...SECONDS FROM DISASTER!
There was a series called Crash Files: Inside the NTSB that aired in 20 years ago. Until a year ago 3 episodes had survived on YT but they've been taken down. If anyone knows how to see them now I'd be interested as they were brilliantly produced. Greg Feith featured in one of them.
I cant imagine how horrified the passengers must have been as that plane was rolling at 400km heading towards the ground. Complete nightmare way to die
That’s sad, I couldn’t imagine what was going through the passengers minds knowing there was nothing they could do. When I was flying my F-16 I knew if anything ever happened like being hit by a SAM I could eject. Prayers to their families
as a 22 year aviator, i have big respect to Greg Feith. NTSB and our aviation world is very lucky to have this kind of people. He always explains most simple way to make sure everyone can understand. God bless you Greg Feit
I love him too. He so down to earth, and when he explains investigations he doesn't use over dramatic or sensationalistic language. He is so young in this video!
As a retired pilot I have a high regard for NTSB investigators. A friend of mine in Navy became one of them. He thoroughly enjoyed his job. Except during 9/11 when they were ordered to stand down. They were not allowed to investigate the crash sites. The ATR crash shown here is similar to what the government told us happened in Shanksville. There was a similar hole but the big difference is that at Shanksville, there were no airplane parts, no body parts and other debris that could have used to investigate the crash. Same thing with the crash at the Pentagon. Why did the government order the NTSB to stand down in 9/11? I know the answer but not a lot people do. The NTSB owe us an explanation.
Watch Interview with Rebekah Roth on UA-cam. Former flight attendant who compared notes with aviation experts and discusses oddities of 9/11 investigation.. Very interesting points.
I know! Whenever I hear people talk about 9-11 conspiracies, they always try to say that the towers were not struck by airplanes because there weren't any remnants of either plane found in the rubble. I always respond saying they should go watch some of these plane crash documentaries to see that it is actually very common for there to be essentially nothing left
The towers were struck by the airplanes,however the buildings collapsed from explosions located at the foundation of each towers;like they do it at demolition sites. That’s why many experts questioned the event in that day
@@artbyviktoria9265 indeed, the airplanes were the critical distraction and false explanation for the destruction of the towers. actual science and multiple tests proved that burning kerosene and even flashing kerosene is not hot enough to damage the titanium alloy frame of the towers enough to cause a collapse of even one floor. the whole event was a typical casus belli and it worked. even today most people believe those buildings went down due to planes crashing into them.
@@Lee-wg7en Real quick, are you saying it wasn’t planes crashing into the building that caused 911? All those frantic calls to people families on the ground wasn’t real? I’m really curious what are you talking about?
“Essentially nothing left” that’s because airplanes are made of aluminum and are relatively flimsy. So it just helps proves the point. That they could not bring down massive steel structures in free fall form that quickly. Jet fuel certainly doesn’t do it either. Bombs were placed and detonated.
@@kevinfinnerty8414 I don't think conventional bombs could have done this either. Samples were taken of the debris at ground zero and they contained traces of thermite residue. remember the van bomb at the base of one of the towers in the 80s/90s, it didn't do anything to the structure
Hey!!! I think I have seen about this accident on TV on NGC. Season 7 of air crash investigations. Super cooled liquid droplets. Gregory feith is a legend. This reenactment is from discovery channel. The pilots put it on flap 15 (I'm not an expert...not even close). They were being unprofessional (all was shown in the MAYDAY OR AIR CRASH INVESTIGATION).....the airline was warned by another pilot that ATR is prone to icing issues. Nobody knew about SUPER COOLED LIQUID DROPLETS till then.
also, suspender braces, which tbh are eternally cool but you need the right physique for them, e.g. Arnold Schwarzenegger at the start of The Running Man
There is a big difference between 2 pilots that can eject themselves if too much snow is formed on the wings and a whole plane that had too die because the plane nose dived and react strangely for many reasons , When is the industry going to make planes that can land on water or eject a whole plane if crashing is certain.
One thing about 'Black Boxes:' They are far from indestructible. It's not uncommon for a FDR or CVR to be damaged beyond use by a post-crash fire (Air Inter 148), to not have functioned at all (LearJet XC-VMC/Arrow Air 1285), or can be intentionally disabled (SilkAir 185/LaMia 2933).
@ARKHAMxMaverick Same for David Learmount. They are the two best experts in terms of providing a simple clear explanation for a specific complex situation.
There was almost similar circumstances when a wide-body passenger-jet crashed almost vertically into swampland in the Everglades, & apparently search aircraft flew over the scene several times before they realised that it was the crash-site they were looking for!
RIP 🙏 to all on board.What an awful thing to happen.My thoughts and prayers are with the families and friends that were on the tragic flight that night
Omg, this is horrific. Can you imagine holding your child knowing you are falling to your deaths. I can’t even stand it. It’s so sad. Why don’t they have parachutes for every passenger and have them line up and get ready to jump. At least they have a chance that way.
While there should be recording of data and voice as a "black box", that data also should be transmitted to a ground station in case the BB is destroyed. Also, this procedure would weed out obsolete boxes. In the second example, the ultimate cause is strange in that the pilots supposedly were familiar with those foggy conditions, having flown through them many times before. Why was this time any different?
Such a devastating tragedy. R.I.P. 2:26. O'Hare International Airport, busiest airport in the world. Thought it was Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport? HATE! Whingers whinging about ads. 1: The program is free. 2: Take a few minutes, download and install AD Blocker. Its FREE, easy to use, no more ads and it quits your whinging. It works on mobile phones.
the kind of videos i'm watching since a few days.. explanations of airplane crashes.. very interesting.. now i know a few things about how to react with a commercial airplane in various trouble..
@@ronniewall1481, No ads at all, music keeps playing (if you want) while you’re working on other apps... I never thought I’d say this, but it’s really worth it.
The USAF has an NK-135 used at Edwards AFB to facilitate icing tests. After this accident, they did airborne icing test to confirm what happened. They put water dye in the water to see where icing forms on the aircraft.
Just a couple of minutes in and already I see huge factual inaccuracies. The interior shots are not even close to resembling an ATR. The accident happened in daylight not at night, there was no storm in Indy when the plane took off, it was sunny there. The ATC person involved was a woman and not a man, as portrayed here. Those are just a couple things I noticed. It kind of puts a hit on credibility as many of these errors are just sloppy.
Not only that, it was most likely a 727 or a DC 10 turbofan flight deck being portrayed on the video. The cabin was different again, not a 727 which is single aisle, The ATR 72 certainly didn't have a flight engineer, like this video shows.
Also, literally less than a minute in "black boxes are indestructible". No they aren’t. They are extremely tough for sure, but there have been crashes where the black boxes were destroyed, often from a very high speed impact.
1:41 "As the twin-engine turboprop approached it's destination" *Shows a wide-body airliner cabin. You can tell this was made before internet comment sections...
Maybe they already do this. I mean I can't be the first person to think of this, but why not send the flight data and voice recordings to the cloud in real time via satellite? Maybe keep the black boxes for back up. This way they don't have to hunt through tons of rubble or scour the bottom of the ocean to retrieve the data.
The technology for this is just being rolled out, flight 370 was sending maintenance data to a satelite but only in short bursts every 5 or so minutes. sending data to satelites is still power hungry and requires compressed data. The black boxes would need two or more uplinks for the parameters currently collected.
That's already being experimented on. There are a number of military flights, largely medical, that are experimenting with that technology. I don't think we'll see it in the civilian market for at least another couple years.
@Winter Geri Thanks I am a bit too old to watch videos on 4 inch screen. I watch on my PC which has good ad blocker but Yatube beats it now. for a while the blocker worked great
Failing to monitor altitude while landing is a major cause of crashes. Flying in a small plane under IFR requires an alert and competent pilot, not something guaranteed. It takes only a lapse in judgment.
We all have to thank aircraft investigation ,it saves lives and we learn from these accidents ,if we learn then we can prevent these from happening again .
ALAWYS MUCH EASYER TO BLAME THE DEAD;> EYES CAN BE CLOSED;> THE BODY CAN FEEL IF IT IS BEING PUSHED AWAY OR AGAINST THE BACK REST OF THE SEAT;> GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND STUDY SOME MORE;> CLAIMED GENIUSES ANS EXPERTS CAN BE IDIOTS AT THE SAME TIME;>BUT NOT NECCESSARILY INTELLIGENT...
So now people,it is important that you apply that clear, vision to the fact that, Shanksville PA,was never the crash site of a large airliner FL93,on September 11,2001.
ATR is a fantastically stable aircraft. What do you mean by narrow? It's been proven over and over again that straight wings are much more aerodynamically stable in flight but sweptback wings allow much greater speed. If you are referring to the thickness of the airfoil, this too is a factor of less drag at low speed.
@@kaymornasinclair5088 a small plane with straight broad wings is very safe and could just glide to the ground if needed, not like this narrow winged plane that fell likea brick from the sky just cause some ice coated the narrow useless wings
Even the terminology of the NTSB makes it sound like the pilot had a vendetta against that field where they crashed ! Hi angle of attack? I mean come on man!
Does it really matter? The entire accident that we saw in this documentary was a dramatization made for viewing. There weren’t really cameras that were videotaping inside as it crashes.
Still makes no sense how they described it in this video. Just because there is disruption of the wing top surface area toward the trailing edge, it would not throw that wing down violently , the ailerons? why didn't they mention the flaps and the auto-pilot more? i did hear them mention it was in auto-pilot...but he never said whether taking it OFF OF A/P would have helped. And the FLAPS, where did they need to be to not crash? Why isn't this explained in this ?
@@TheVeek192 You commented for NOTHING and it was MEANINGLESS. If someone suggested something to improve my channel and maybe get another subscriber I would at least consider it. That's how they make money. Go troll someone else.
I don't understand. If there was turbulence over the aileron, then surely it wouldn't have caused low pressure. As per the effect of icing on top of the wing, causing turbulence that in turn destroys lift. The aileron therefore would not have been 'pulled up' in that direction. Can someone please explain?
I am 2:19 into the video. It is describing the twin engine turbo prop approaching Chicago in bad weather. However, the video is showing the cabin of a wide body aircraft as the cabin of a single engine turbo prop. Did anyone vet this for accuracy? You just lost me….
There were four hijackings that were all related to each other on 9/11. AA 77 and United 93’s black boxes survived the crashes. The investigators also worked with the FBI and Air Traffic Control to determine that it was hijacking. Security cameras also showed that the hijackers made it through security, because it wasn’t as strict as it is today. It’s not the first time that crashes have been related to each other. Look up the 737 rudder problem. Two crashes were undetermined until a third 737 experienced a rudder hardcover that they found the cause of all three.
The documentary did manage to answer the question that gets asked constantly, "Why should it take 2 years or more to issue the findings in the report?" What people fail to realise is that it's not simply a question of pointing to something that went wrong; It's eliminating a thousand things that might have led to what ultimately led to the crash.. The cause behind the cause, behind the cause.
++9[[[)lp
Yes there is rarely a crash that has a single cause. There is always an entire sequence of things going wrong that must align perfectly to cause a crash. This one was no different.
@@pooryorick831 Indeed!! Disasters don't just happen, they're a chain of critical events. Unravel the clues and count down those final...SECONDS FROM DISASTER!
@@Vortigan07 I love you!!😂😂
@@Vortigan07 yeahhhhhhhhhhh
I definitely agree. We certainly do need another Greg Feith.
Overrated
Greg Feith’s ties are as legendary as he is.
👊🤠🤚
I’m telling you!!!! Always been that way too lol
@@jessicaurbina4246 Lol, always, agreed! 🙃
InstaBlaster.
Yes its such a shame he is gay
There’s a bunch of air crash investigation channels all over UA-cam personally I’m obsessed with them
They're very addictive
@Thomas- Indeed and this one is actually the most effective and educational.
I soooo understand you ;-)
Yes me too! I will NEVER fly again✈✈🛫🛫🛬🛬
I’m so glad there are others just like me out there! I’m hooked on them too!
There was a series called Crash Files: Inside the NTSB that aired in 20 years ago. Until a year ago 3 episodes had survived on YT but they've been taken down. If anyone knows how to see them now I'd be interested as they were brilliantly produced. Greg Feith featured in one of them.
I cant imagine how horrified the passengers must have been as that plane was rolling at 400km heading towards the ground. Complete nightmare way to die
A vacation for life.
I know. RIP to those victims!
Yes, I was on an airplane that was experiencing windshear. Everyone got very quiet. It was as if we were all frozen.
Yeah that would be horrendous, hope those people had all taken care of where their souls would be going😉
Hopefully it happened so quickly there wasn't any time for panic and suffering. I can't imagine.
That’s sad, I couldn’t imagine what was going through the passengers minds knowing there was nothing they could do. When I was flying my F-16 I knew if anything ever happened like being hit by a SAM I could eject. Prayers to their families
Definitely...that must have been so devastating. 🙏🏼
as a 22 year aviator, i have big respect to Greg Feith. NTSB and our aviation world is very lucky to have this kind of people. He always explains most simple way to make sure everyone can understand. God bless you Greg Feit
I love him too. He so down to earth, and when he explains investigations he doesn't use over dramatic or sensationalistic language.
He is so young in this video!
I think it's Greg fieth
shawn douglass i mistyped it should Feith but not fieth:)
Not only that but he has some super strong hairspray😋😷
As a retired pilot I have a high regard for NTSB investigators. A friend of mine in Navy became one of them. He thoroughly enjoyed his job. Except during 9/11 when they were ordered to stand down. They were not allowed to investigate the crash sites. The ATR crash shown here is similar to what the government told us happened in Shanksville. There was a similar hole but the big difference is that at Shanksville, there were no airplane parts, no body parts and other debris that could have used to investigate the crash. Same thing with the crash at the Pentagon. Why did the government order the NTSB to stand down in 9/11? I know the answer but not a lot people do. The NTSB owe us an explanation.
Please tell us.
Watch Interview with Rebekah Roth on UA-cam. Former flight attendant who compared notes with aviation experts and discusses oddities of 9/11 investigation.. Very interesting points.
Wow, poor people, must have been terrifying
I know! Whenever I hear people talk about 9-11 conspiracies, they always try to say that the towers were not struck by airplanes because there weren't any remnants of either plane found in the rubble. I always respond saying they should go watch some of these plane crash documentaries to see that it is actually very common for there to be essentially nothing left
The towers were struck by the airplanes,however the buildings collapsed from explosions located at the foundation of each towers;like they do it at demolition sites. That’s why many experts questioned the event in that day
@@artbyviktoria9265 indeed, the airplanes were the critical distraction and false explanation for the destruction of the towers. actual science and multiple tests proved that burning kerosene and even flashing kerosene is not hot enough to damage the titanium alloy frame of the towers enough to cause a collapse of even one floor. the whole event was a typical casus belli and it worked. even today most people believe those buildings went down due to planes crashing into them.
@@Lee-wg7en Real quick, are you saying it wasn’t planes crashing into the building that caused 911? All those frantic calls to people families on the ground wasn’t real? I’m really curious what are you talking about?
“Essentially nothing left” that’s because airplanes are made of aluminum and are relatively flimsy. So it just helps proves the point. That they could not bring down massive steel structures in free fall form that quickly. Jet fuel certainly doesn’t do it either. Bombs were placed and detonated.
@@kevinfinnerty8414 I don't think conventional bombs could have done this either. Samples were taken of the debris at ground zero and they contained traces of thermite residue. remember the van bomb at the base of one of the towers in the 80s/90s, it didn't do anything to the structure
You have to love an accident Investigator who has the licence plate "CRASH 1"
His license plate tells me all I need to know. If a man is confident he has to be smart
Doesn’t he??????????
Hey!!! I think I have seen about this accident on TV on NGC. Season 7 of air crash investigations. Super cooled liquid droplets. Gregory feith is a legend. This reenactment is from discovery channel. The pilots put it on flap 15 (I'm not an expert...not even close). They were being unprofessional (all was shown in the MAYDAY OR AIR CRASH INVESTIGATION).....the airline was warned by another pilot that ATR is prone to icing issues. Nobody knew about SUPER COOLED LIQUID DROPLETS till then.
God be with the families of those on board...grant them your peace. Amen 🙏🙏🙏 Extremely well put together narrative.
19:00
My cousin came in with no context and asked "why's that plane peeing on the other one?"
And... I can't unsee that now.
Greg Feith and John Fox Are my 2 Favorite. Those guys are amazing. God bless.
John Cox(I blame the spell check).
14:36 Proof this was from the early 90s (mullet plus crazy necktie). What a time to be a kid, though.
also, suspender braces, which tbh are eternally cool but you need the right physique for them, e.g. Arnold Schwarzenegger at the start of The Running Man
Greg Fieth was born for this.
This one had to be filmed like 20 years ago according to how young he is.👀☺️
There is a big difference between 2 pilots that can eject themselves if too much snow is formed on the wings and a whole plane that had too
die because the plane nose dived and react strangely for many reasons , When is the industry going to make planes that can land on water or
eject a whole plane if crashing is certain.
One thing about 'Black Boxes:' They are far from indestructible. It's not uncommon for a FDR or CVR to be damaged beyond use by a post-crash fire (Air Inter 148), to not have functioned at all (LearJet XC-VMC/Arrow Air 1285), or can be intentionally disabled (SilkAir 185/LaMia 2933).
I think Greg Feith is always good at explaining stuff to us laymen.
@ARKHAMxMaverick Same for David Learmount. They are the two best experts in terms of providing a simple clear explanation for a specific complex situation.
Greg- the Stall Stud
I'm always happy when he is lead investigator, he has a very calm and professional attitude and he really cares about the victims.
GF is the best!!
Lesley Leith . Good analogy. I’ve read both of John Douglas’s books. He’s incredible.
Can't get past how so little can be left of something so big😢
Your soda pop can and the aircraft are made of the same thing.
Yeah I look at the aerial photos of that crash site and to me it looks just like a bug splattered on a windshield. Terrifying.
Thats all it fookin takes a little thing like that amazing
@@anicetomaldonado wow
There was almost similar circumstances when a wide-body passenger-jet crashed almost vertically into swampland in the Everglades, & apparently search aircraft flew over the scene several times before they realised that it was the crash-site they were looking for!
RIP 🙏 to all on board.What an awful thing to happen.My thoughts and prayers are with the families and friends that were on the tragic flight that night
Omg, this is horrific. Can you imagine holding your child knowing you are falling to your deaths. I can’t even stand it. It’s so sad. Why don’t they have parachutes for every passenger and have them line up and get ready to jump. At least they have a chance that way.
I hear you, but the speeds involved would usually make that impossible.
That can't be done bcz if a person jumps out of the plane then he goes directly into the engine.
I love documentarys like this..
Wow!! Such a horrible death.,,RIP to all those victims!
While there should be recording of data and voice as a "black box", that data also should be transmitted to a ground station in case the BB is destroyed. Also, this procedure would weed out obsolete boxes. In the second example, the ultimate cause is strange in that the pilots supposedly were familiar with those foggy conditions, having flown through them many times before. Why was this time any different?
Such a devastating tragedy. R.I.P.
2:26. O'Hare International Airport, busiest airport in the world. Thought it was Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport?
HATE! Whingers whinging about ads. 1: The program is free. 2: Take a few minutes, download and install AD Blocker. Its FREE, easy to use, no more ads and it quits your whinging. It works on mobile phones.
The program is not free... It's financed by the ads...now do you get it.
the kind of videos i'm watching since a few days.. explanations of airplane crashes.. very interesting.. now i know a few things about how to react with a commercial airplane in various trouble..
Excellent program.
ATR de-icing problem solved. Like closing the barn door after the cow gets out. Take the bus, they never fall out of the sky.
14:57 Even the model fell apart when he was showing it in a dive
The propellar fell off 😊
lol
I’m never flying in a prop plane
I wonder if any of these crash investigators think twice when getting on aircraft after seeing these horific accidents live
I love the brains of investigators. It takes a high engagement of the brain to come up with something
And knowledge and thoroughness.
I think they should make airplanes as strong as the BLACK BOX .
WAY TOO MANY ADS!!!!!
Subscribe.
HOW WILL SUBSIDE HELP.
@@ronniewall1481, No ads at all, music keeps playing (if you want) while you’re working on other apps... I never thought I’d say this, but it’s really worth it.
@@lisaschuster9187 I AM SUBSCRIBED WHY AM I GETTING ADS
@@ronniewall1481 greed
I want to know if the issue of the outdated/illegal FDR was addressed. That falls right on the CEO of that company in my opinion.
the interior shots of the atr-72 remember the seating is 2x2 not what is shown
The USAF has an NK-135 used at Edwards AFB to facilitate icing tests. After this accident, they did airborne icing test to confirm what happened. They put water dye in the water to see where icing forms on the aircraft.
They're showing that test now, @ 18:20
Using an L-1011 cockpit to illustrate a small turboprop planes crash.
And cabin.
Just a couple of minutes in and already I see huge factual inaccuracies. The interior shots are not even close to resembling an ATR. The accident happened in daylight not at night, there was no storm in Indy when the plane took off, it was sunny there. The ATC person involved was a woman and not a man, as portrayed here. Those are just a couple things I noticed. It kind of puts a hit on credibility as many of these errors are just sloppy.
Oh come on. DC-10 and ATR, same thing haha
@@Turbojets_Channel Yeah right lol.
Make your own documentary then.
Not only that, it was most likely a 727 or a DC 10 turbofan flight deck being portrayed on the video. The cabin was different again, not a 727 which is single aisle, The ATR 72 certainly didn't have a flight engineer, like this video shows.
Also, literally less than a minute in "black boxes are indestructible". No they aren’t. They are extremely tough for sure, but there have been crashes where the black boxes were destroyed, often from a very high speed impact.
Such a huge ATR72 cabin!
That's BULL SH$%. A crash like that, tiny pieces everywhere, everybody knows everybody is dead.
Bruh! You accidentally put some aviation video in your ads.
Run Brave as your browser, it automatically blocks all ads. I saw none during this.
@@angelmessenger8240 most don’t watch it on a browser most watch on a phone or tablet.
@@rationallyruby use youtube Vanced
ad block plus go get it and shut up.
@@angelmessenger8240 no
1:41 "As the twin-engine turboprop approached it's destination"
*Shows a wide-body airliner cabin.
You can tell this was made before internet comment sections...
this was basically made before the internet! But it is not stopping me watching them all! :D
WARNING - 5 minutes in and just hit the THIRD commercial.
Ikr
Really annoying
Just instal an Adbloc on your computer and you will never be bothered with commercials again...
@@arianefr78 .
Not with U tube premium. Yes I pay a premium NOT to see commercials. Commercials are the worst.
Greg’s solid for sure, good call, he’s a baller ⛹️ when it comes to figuring out who the f€}£ blew it and how lol
Maybe they already do this. I mean I can't be the first person to think of this, but why not send the flight data and voice recordings to the cloud in real time via satellite? Maybe keep the black boxes for back up. This way they don't have to hunt through tons of rubble or scour the bottom of the ocean to retrieve the data.
The technology for this is just being rolled out, flight 370 was sending maintenance data to a satelite but only in short bursts every 5 or so minutes. sending data to satelites is still power hungry and requires compressed data.
The black boxes would need two or more uplinks for the parameters currently collected.
That's already being experimented on. There are a number of military flights, largely medical, that are experimenting with that technology. I don't think we'll see it in the civilian market for at least another couple years.
I've often wondered this myself while watching Mayday/ACI.
Or just, you know, install a modern black box or two.
You think you have nightmares. Just imagine the ones Greg Fieth must have at times! Nooo thanks!
usually when the investigators get to the crash site all fires are out
Whenever a skid mark appears, Greg Feith appears
You don’t have enough commercials on this video so please add more.
What ads? Highly recommend AdBlocker!
UA-cam vanced ❤️
@@stevie-ray2020 it’s called sarcasm.
Ads every two and a half minutes? I'm gone!
Does it trigger you that the crash is an ATR 72, but they are showing the cockpit and cabin of an L-1011??
Good Doc!
Very informative and I enjoyed it even though I had about a ad every minutes, someone is trying to make money
@Winter Geri Thanks I am a bit too old to watch videos on 4 inch screen. I watch on my PC which has good ad blocker but Yatube beats it now. for a while the blocker worked great
ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK BOX.
😂😂😂
very complicated investigation.
Nice to know that Canada relies on up-to-date technology in its planes. Metal foil for a flight recorder? Never flying Air Canada again.
It's about time they put an emergency exit door on every plane and gave everyone whos on the flight a parachute
Lesley Leith Exactly!!
Why don't we have that crazy safety foam from Demolition Man yet?
I live in indiana rite by where that plane crashed. Ive been there. Theres a small memorial there. Like one small plack. I wanna medal detect there.
Richie valens, John Denver, buddy holly, lynyrd skynyrd, Alia, and Kobe get on a plane..... what do you do
*Aaliyah.
ATR-72 with a DC-10 cockpit? Lol
Haha, oh boy...I was listening to audio only and didn’t see that!! XD Kinda like the movie Airplane with the DC-10 and prop noise...
Thats a L-1011 cockpit.
The L-1011 & DC-10 look very similar. The only difference is up close & personal.
That mullet is sick
What happened to the plane at the Shanksville crash site? They said most of it buried itself underground. How?
The force was so great as it hit the ground that it plowed into it and under the earth.
A lot of the plane and human remains are still buried there.
@@jaynehigg78 Man that dog gone jet fuel melted a building but failed to set the grass on fire at shanksville ua-cam.com/video/dnUMft2p7KI/v-deo.html
One bloody long commercial with occasional bits of disaster video.
Failing to monitor altitude while landing is a major cause of crashes. Flying in a small plane under IFR requires an alert and competent pilot, not something guaranteed. It takes only a lapse in judgment.
We all have to thank aircraft investigation ,it saves lives and we learn from these accidents ,if we learn then we can prevent these from happening again .
3:28 Kid on the left predicted the plane was about to go crazy. 🤣
ALAWYS MUCH EASYER TO BLAME THE DEAD;> EYES CAN BE CLOSED;> THE BODY CAN FEEL IF IT IS BEING PUSHED AWAY OR AGAINST THE BACK REST OF THE SEAT;> GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND STUDY SOME MORE;> CLAIMED GENIUSES ANS EXPERTS CAN BE IDIOTS AT THE SAME TIME;>BUT NOT NECCESSARILY INTELLIGENT...
14:58 lol the prop fell off
Yeah,- but did you see his über confident catch? He didn't even have to look.
@24:00 This accident seems very similar to the Polish 2010 air disaster over Smolensk.
It's amazing how few larger parts that exist. The plane must have hit with high velosity to mutilate the parts to small bits.
So now people,it is important that you apply that clear, vision to the fact that, Shanksville PA,was never the crash site of a large airliner FL93,on September 11,2001.
Narrow wings is the problem of this plane , just looking at it i would not send my mail with this plane
ATR is a fantastically stable aircraft. What do you mean by narrow? It's been proven over and over again that straight wings are much more aerodynamically stable in flight but sweptback wings allow much greater speed. If you are referring to the thickness of the airfoil, this too is a factor of less drag at low speed.
@@Turbojets_Channel good you like you then you fly it hahaha idiot
I don’t trust those small planes....would never get on one.
@@kaymornasinclair5088 a small plane with straight broad wings is very safe and could just glide to the ground if needed, not like this narrow winged plane that fell likea brick from the sky just cause some ice coated the narrow useless wings
Perhaps the pilots could have diverted to MIDWAY or, at least, TRIED to nip into an alternative airfield, under the circumstances?
@Real Responders Any more air crash investigations you can post? Thanks!!
@Laura White Yes.. but not many ACI on You Tube now.. most of them have been deleted.
Make the planes out of the same metal that makes the black boxes!!
Too heavy, the planes will fall out of the sky and people will suffer too much. Much like a slow death. I’m guessing you were kidding, right?
Alvaro aka Tico you have a point.
Nice catch: 14:57
Pilots should not be running on gut feelings. Why didn't he use the plane's instruments?
This show is twenty three years old!
No its not this episode was made just 15 minuites ago by a man called
JOHN CENA!!!!!
We could ask the FAA if they could crash a few planes so the program could be updated
Even the terminology of the NTSB makes it sound like the pilot had a vendetta against that field where they crashed ! Hi angle of attack? I mean come on man!
that is standard aviation terminology. You can get a comfort goldfish if the language disturbs you.
show the so called interior of a atr-72 how wrong was that picture
Lol it was from an L 1011
Does it really matter? The entire accident that we saw in this documentary was a dramatization made for viewing. There weren’t really cameras that were videotaping inside as it crashes.
Caused by Hillary Clinton cackling on her broomstick.
You need a few more advertisements in the video.
Still makes no sense how they described it in this video. Just because there is disruption of the wing top surface area toward the trailing edge, it would not throw that wing down violently , the ailerons? why didn't they mention the flaps and the auto-pilot more? i did hear them mention it was in auto-pilot...but he never said whether taking it OFF OF A/P would have helped. And the FLAPS, where did they need to be to not crash? Why isn't this explained in this ?
12:05 dugg bradey is a Black box expert but not a specialist
@10:21 Could someone please help her out with the packaging so we can get this party started already?
Too hard to hear those transcripts. Can you use subtitles? Makes sense doesn't it?
It's free. Stop expecting that you'll get exactly what you want for NOTHING.
@@TheVeek192 You commented for NOTHING and it was MEANINGLESS. If someone suggested something to improve my channel and maybe get another subscriber I would at least consider it. That's how they make money. Go troll someone else.
I don't understand.
If there was turbulence over the aileron, then surely it wouldn't have caused low pressure.
As per the effect of icing on top of the wing, causing turbulence that in turn destroys lift.
The aileron therefore would not have been 'pulled up' in that direction.
Can someone please explain?
god i love adblock
I am 2:19 into the video. It is describing the twin engine turbo prop approaching Chicago in bad weather. However, the video is showing the cabin of a wide body aircraft as the cabin of a single engine turbo prop. Did anyone vet this for accuracy? You just lost me….
No more commercials please!
True😊🇧🇷
You should do a video on TWA 800
Joe Was I agree
Unfortunately, the show is no longer on the air... unless it's under a different name.
Every airport they say is one of the busiest in the world. I guess there's no airport's that aren't the slowest in the world.
Glad they didn't have to eject from the ATR!
Black boxes lives matta
I’m curious where the crime was? Wouldn’t it been an accident unless the pilot was on a suicide mission?
the technical adviser got everything wrong
Three ads in the first 5 mins?! Put me off. I stopped watching.
What can we learn from an airplane crash site?.... that there should be no wreckage or bodies if it was a taliban hijacking?!?!
There were four hijackings that were all related to each other on 9/11. AA 77 and United 93’s black boxes survived the crashes. The investigators also worked with the FBI and Air Traffic Control to determine that it was hijacking. Security cameras also showed that the hijackers made it through security, because it wasn’t as strict as it is today.
It’s not the first time that crashes have been related to each other. Look up the 737 rudder problem. Two crashes were undetermined until a third 737 experienced a rudder hardcover that they found the cause of all three.
@@Powerranger-le4up yes I remember that one